Skip to main content
Log in

Which trees form the best soil? Reclaimed mine soil properties under 22 tree species: 50 years later—assessment of physical and chemical properties

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Forest Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forest reclamations have been very commonly used on post-mining sites in central Europe and offer great opportunities for research of soil formation process. Antonín forest arboretum near Sokolov, Czech Republic, reclaimed and afforested between 1972 and 1974 was the opportunity to compare the influence of only the vegetation variable. In this research, physical and chemical soil properties from the uppermost mineral 5 cm of 23 stands (11 broadleaved and 12 coniferous) were analysed and compared. Soil pH, bulk density, porosity, water retention capacity, organic and total carbon and nitrogen content, plant available nutrients and potentially toxic elements were analysed. From the species tested, the soil properties that can generally be considered beneficial were noticed in Alnus glutinosa, Fagus sylvatica, Tilia cordata, Pyrus communis, Picea pungens and Pinus ponderosa. On the other hand, species that have not shown these soil properties were Betula pendula, Larix decidua, Picea abies, Pinus rotundata, Pinus strobus and Pinus sylvestris. It is also worth mentioning that, although some species have shown soil properties that can be considered more or less favourable from a pedological point of view, the choice of species for afforestation of post-mining sites needs to consider other factors as well, like stand health, growth potential, affinity to climatic, hydrological, and other factors, potential invasiveness, susceptibility to pathogens.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1
Graph 1
Graph 2
Graph 3
Graph 4
Graph 5
Graph 6
Graph 7
Graph 8
Graph 9
Graph 10
Graph 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the members of Dendrology Institute of Polish Academy of Sciences in Kórnik for their hospitality, whilst this paper was in preparation and valuable information and experience gained there with the help of the researchers of this institution.

Funding

This research was financed by the Project “Centre for the investigation of synthesis and transformation of nutritional substances in the food chain in interaction with potentially harmful substances of anthropogenic origin: comprehensive assessment of soil contamination risks for the quality of agricultural products” of the European Structural and Investment Funds Operational Programme Research, Development and Education of the European Union and the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000845.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MS was contributed to writing—original Draft, conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, visualisation. OV was contributed to conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis. KV was contributed to writing—review and editing, investigation. VT was contributed to supervision, resources. PV was contributed to investigation. PK was contributed to investigation. FP was contributed to investigation. RV was contributed to formal analysis. LB was contributed to project administration, funding acquisition. OD was contributed to conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marko Spasić.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Financial support was provided by Ministry of Education Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic.

Ethical approval

All authors have read and accepted the Ethical Responsibilities of Authors.

Consent to participate

All authors have given consent to participate.

Consent for publication

All authors have given consent for publication.

Additional information

Communicated by Agustin Merino.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spasić, M., Vacek, O., Vejvodová, K. et al. Which trees form the best soil? Reclaimed mine soil properties under 22 tree species: 50 years later—assessment of physical and chemical properties. Eur J Forest Res 143, 561–579 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-023-01637-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-023-01637-x

Keywords

Navigation