PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest
PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest
PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>PE</strong> <strong>EIE</strong>[R-<strong>Rg</strong><br />
RESEARC H<br />
O N<br />
C<strong>ON</strong>IFEROUS<br />
FOREST<br />
ECOSYSTEMS °<br />
a symposiu m<br />
I77t<br />
THIS PUBLICATI<strong>ON</strong> C<strong>ON</strong>STITUTES A C<strong>ON</strong>TRIBUTI<strong>ON</strong> TO TH E<br />
U.S./INTERNATI<strong>ON</strong>AL BIOME PROGRAM
The editors :<br />
JERRY F. FRANKLIN, Principal Plant Ecologist,<br />
Pacific Northwest <strong>Forest</strong><br />
and Range Experiment Statio n<br />
L . J. DEMPSTER, Consulting Editor ,<br />
Corvallis<br />
RICHARD H. WARING, Associate Professor ,<br />
Oregon State University ,<br />
Corvallis<br />
Proprietary or brand names are used only to document actua l<br />
experience ; their use does not imply approval of the product to th e<br />
exclusion of others which may also be suitable .
Research on<br />
Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems :<br />
First Year Progress in th e<br />
Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome, USu RP<br />
Proceedings of a Symposiu m<br />
held at<br />
NORTHWEST SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATIO N<br />
Forty-fifth Annual Meeting<br />
Bellingham, Washingto n<br />
March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Edited by<br />
Jerry F. Franklin<br />
L . J. Dempster<br />
Richard H . Waring<br />
Published in 1972 by<br />
Pacific Northwest <strong>Forest</strong> and Range Experiment Statio n<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Service, U .S. Department of Agriculture<br />
Portland, Orego n<br />
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S . Government Printing Offic e<br />
Washington, D .C., 20402 - Price $2 .50 Stock Number 0101-0233
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Foreword<br />
The research program organized under th e<br />
Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome is probably th e<br />
largest and most comprehensive single effor t<br />
at ecosystem analysis being carried out in th e<br />
Western United States . After a long period o f<br />
planning and discussion, it is finally in its firs t<br />
year of full-scale activity . Despite this youthful<br />
state there is great interest among ecologists<br />
both within and beyond the Biom e<br />
"boundaries" in the conceptual basis for th e<br />
Biome's program and present and planne d<br />
research .<br />
Consequently, at the invitation of th e<br />
Northwest Scientific Association, members o f<br />
the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome organized th e<br />
symposium, "Research on Coniferous Fores t<br />
Ecosystems : First Year Progress in the Coniferous<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Biome, US/IBP." The symposium<br />
was presented at the 45th Annual<br />
Meeting of the Northwest Scientific Association<br />
on March 23 and 24, 1972 . It highlighted<br />
the concepts and plans underlying major segments<br />
of the Biome program and the numerous<br />
new insights, techniques, and data which<br />
are resulting from the varied research activities .<br />
This volume contains the proceedings of<br />
that symposium. Publication was made<br />
possible only by the full cooperation and considerable<br />
contributions of the Pacific North -<br />
west <strong>Forest</strong> and Range Experiment Station,<br />
USDA <strong>Forest</strong> Service . Station staff not only<br />
assisted significantly in the editorial phases<br />
but handled the production in its entiret y<br />
from edited copy to final printing . Furthermore,<br />
this was done under severe deadlines in<br />
order that the volume be available for th e<br />
Fifth Assembly of the International Biologica l<br />
Program in August of 1972 .<br />
The editors would also like to acknowledg e<br />
the numerous contributions others made t o<br />
the production of this volume : To Drs . Dal e<br />
W. Cole and Frieda B . Taub for their significant<br />
part in organizing and conducting the<br />
symposium ; to the majority of authors an d<br />
referees who cooperated magnificently i n<br />
producing the necessary materials unde r<br />
severe time limitations ; to George M . Hansen ,<br />
Betty J . Bell, Mildred I . Hoyt, and others i n<br />
Editorial Services of the Pacific Northwes t<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> and Range Experiment Station, wh o<br />
bore the burden of preparing the volume fo r<br />
printing ; and to Robert Romancier, Glend a<br />
Faxon, Virginia Hunt, James Overholser, Han s<br />
Riekerk, Charles Grier, and Laura Gregg fo r<br />
their part in obtaining the papers, typing, an d<br />
otherwise assisting in production of th e<br />
volume .<br />
Jerry F . Franklin<br />
L . J . Dempster<br />
Richard H . Waring
Contents<br />
SOME BROADER VIEWS OF BIOME ACTIVITIES 1<br />
Why a Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome ?<br />
Jerry F. Franklin 3<br />
Organization and research program of the Western Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome<br />
S . P. Gessel 7<br />
Findley Lake-the study of a terrestrial-aquatic interfac e<br />
P. R. Olson, D . W. Cole, and R. R. Whitney 1 5<br />
A comparative study of four lake s<br />
Frieda B . Taub, Robert L . Burgner, Eugene B . Welch, and Demetrios E . Spyridakis . . . . 2 1<br />
The modeling process relating to questions about coniferous lake ecosystem s<br />
Douglas M . Eggers and Larry M . Male 3 3<br />
Toward a general model structure for a forest ecosyste m<br />
W . Scott Overton 3 7<br />
Hydrologic modeling in the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biom e<br />
George W. Brown, Robert H . Burgy, R. Dennis Harr, and J. Paul Riley 4 9<br />
Preliminary considerations of the forest canopy consumer subsyste m<br />
M . A. Strand and W. P. Nagel 7 1<br />
An environmental grid for classifying coniferous forest ecosystems<br />
R. H. Waring, K . L. Reed, and W . H . Emmingham 7 9<br />
Pag e<br />
WATER AND NUTRIENT MOVEMENT THROUGH ECOSYSTEMS 9 3<br />
Modeling water movement within the upper rooting zone of a Cedar River soi l<br />
W. H. Hatheway, P . Machno, and E . Hamerly 9 5<br />
Elemental transport changes occurring during development<br />
of a second-growth Douglas-fir ecosyste m<br />
Charles C. Grier and Dale W. Cole 10 3<br />
Nutrient budget of a Douglas-fir forest on an experimental watershe d<br />
in western Orego n<br />
R. L. Fredriksen 11 5<br />
Nutrient cycling in throughfall and litterfall in 450-year-old Douglas-fir stand s<br />
Albert Abee and Denis Lavender 133
Page<br />
ESTIMATING BIOMASS AND OTHER STATE VARIABLES 14 5<br />
Direct, nondestructive measurement of biomass and structure i n<br />
living old-growth Douglas-fir<br />
William C . Denison, Diane M . Tracy, Frederick M . Rhoades, and Martha Sherwood . . . .14 7<br />
Estimation of biomass and transpiration in coniferous forests using tritiated wate r<br />
J. R. Kline, M . L . Stewart, and C. F. Jordan 15 9<br />
Theodolite surveying for nondestructive biomass samplin g<br />
Eugene E. Addor 16 7<br />
Estimates of biomass and fixed nitrogen of epiphytes from old-growth Douglas-fi r<br />
Lawrence H . Pike, Diane M . Tracy, Martha A. Sherwood, and Diane Nielsen 17 7<br />
Litter, foliage, branch, and stem production in contrasting lodgepole pin e<br />
habitats of the Colorado Front Range<br />
William H . Moir 18 9<br />
Small mammal and bird populations on Thompson Site, Cedar River :<br />
parameters for modelin g<br />
Sterling Miller, Curtis W . Erickson, Richard D . Taber, and Carl H . Nellis 19 9<br />
TERRESTRIAL PROCESS STUDIES 20 9<br />
Terrestrial process studies in conifers-a review<br />
R. B. Walker, D . R . M. Scott, D . J. Salo, and K . L. Reed 21 1<br />
Criteria for selecting an optimal model : terrestrial photosynthesi s<br />
Kenneth L. Reed and Warren L . Webb 22 7<br />
A model of light and temperature controlled net photosynthetic rate s<br />
for terrestrial plants<br />
Warren L. Webb 23 7<br />
Energy flux studies in a coniferous forest ecosyste m<br />
Lloyd W . Gay 24 3<br />
The lysimeter installation on the Cedar River Watershe d<br />
Leo J . Fritschen 25 5<br />
Initial steps in decomposition of Douglas-fir needles under forest conditions<br />
P. L. Minyard and C . H. Driver 26 1<br />
Seasonal and diurnal patterns of water status in Acer circinatu m<br />
James P. Lassoie and David R . M. Scott 26 5<br />
Development and testing of an inexpensive thermoelectrically cooled cuvett e<br />
David J . Salo, John A . Ringo, James H . Nishitani, and Richard B . Walker 273
Page<br />
AQUATIC PROCESS STUDIES 279<br />
Studying streams as a biological uni t<br />
James R . Sedell 28 1<br />
Exploring the aquatic carbon web<br />
Bruce Lighthart and Paul E . Tiegs 28 9<br />
Dynamics of nutrient supply and primary production i n<br />
Lake Sammamish, Washingto n<br />
Eugene B . Welch and Demetrios E. Spyridakis 30 1<br />
Hydroacoustic assessment of limnetic-feeding fishe s<br />
Richard E. Thorne 317
Some Broader View s<br />
of Biome Activities
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Why a Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome?<br />
Jerry F . Frankli n<br />
Principal Plant Ecologis t<br />
<strong>Forest</strong>ry Sciences Laboratory<br />
Pacific Northwest <strong>Forest</strong> an d<br />
Range Experiment Statio n<br />
USDA <strong>Forest</strong> Servic e<br />
Corvallis, Oregon,<br />
and Deputy Directo r<br />
Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biom e<br />
US/I B P<br />
Abstract<br />
This introduction to the symposium outlines some of the reasons large integrated ecological researc h<br />
programs have been deemed necessary despite problems inherent in such "large science" programs .<br />
The Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome program is a n<br />
interdisciplinary research effort concerned<br />
with the structure and functioning of coniferous<br />
forest and associate aquatic ecosystems ,<br />
particularly as they occur in western Nort h<br />
America. Initiated as a part of the U .S. International<br />
Biological Program it is one of si x<br />
biome programs organized in major biotic -<br />
environmental divisions or regions of th e<br />
United States-Deciduous <strong>Forest</strong>, Grassland ,<br />
Desert, Tundra, Tropical, and Coniferous<br />
<strong>Forest</strong>. The first major funding of the Coniferous<br />
Biome occurred in September of 1970 ,<br />
and there are now over 100 scientists from a<br />
total of 15 universities, national laboratories ,<br />
and agencies involved in the program .<br />
Many aspects of this large and vital researc h<br />
program will be described in papers whic h<br />
follow. However, questions continue to arise ,<br />
such as, Is this program necessary? What differentiates<br />
the Biome efforts from the numerous<br />
existing research programs on coniferou s<br />
forests, both large and small? Why has thi s<br />
"big science" effort been mounted ?<br />
So, before looking in detail at the Biome' s<br />
research activities, I'd like to share with yo u<br />
some of my views on the need for and impor -<br />
tance of the Biome program . These views are<br />
not all inclusive nor necessarily shared by al l<br />
involved in the program .<br />
To get close to home, let's consider firs t<br />
the increasingly complex nature of problem s<br />
facing forest land managers. Questions used to<br />
be relatively simple : What cutting system will<br />
regenerate a desired forest type? What effec t<br />
do different thinning or fertilizing regime s<br />
have on production of merchantable timber?<br />
What herbicides will most effectively permi t<br />
reforestation and discourage brush on cutover<br />
areas? Such questions are still interesting an d<br />
important . However, many of the more critical<br />
land management questions reach far beyond<br />
the relatively narrow confines of maximizing<br />
production of goods from forest lands :<br />
How do different cutting methods influence<br />
the flow and quality of water and, further ,<br />
the characteristics of aquatic communities?<br />
What effect does fertilization have on th e<br />
nutrient content or fertility of the wate r<br />
draining from the treated forest land? What<br />
happens to various pesticides when applied to<br />
the land-how fast are they degraded, where<br />
do they accumulate, and what effect do the y<br />
have on nontarget organisms and the eco -<br />
3
system as a whole? And, if the biological an d<br />
physical questions were not sufficiently difficult<br />
(and they are), overriding economic an d<br />
social considerations further compound th e<br />
complexity of land management problems .<br />
The basic knowledge of natural science required<br />
for rational resolution of some of th e<br />
larger questions has thrust some new and<br />
difficult demarJds on the scientific community.<br />
Of coursel large amounts of information<br />
are required ; we often hear of an information<br />
explosion but, in fact, we are faced with a<br />
"demand" explosion-available data are to -<br />
tally inadequate to meet the information requirements<br />
of policymakers. More important ,<br />
however, is the need for new kinds of information,<br />
particularly information on linkage s<br />
between the parts of forest ecosystems, suc h<br />
as land and water, and between economics ,<br />
sociology, and natural sciences . In effect,<br />
information is required which involves th e<br />
links or relationships between the traditiona l<br />
units or disciplines of scientific attention an d<br />
organization .<br />
In addition to the study of linkages amon g<br />
different components of ecosystems, we ar e<br />
searching for properties that are unique to<br />
whole systems. We are asking how much tim e<br />
is required for an ecosystem to fully recover<br />
following disturbance, how many component s<br />
are redundant in the system, what are the<br />
major selection pressures to which ecosystems<br />
respond, and finally, are we forcing ecosystems<br />
to adapt to changes faster than is<br />
possible?<br />
It is also apparent that research program s<br />
must be planned so as to anticipate unforeseen<br />
questions and needs as well as answer<br />
immediate questions . In other words, scientists<br />
must work toward development o f<br />
general principles and models which will allo w<br />
us to predict from past research what wil l<br />
happen in a new situation which has not ye t<br />
been a subject of detailed study . Example s<br />
might be the use of basic models to anticipate<br />
the effect of a cutting system in a new forest<br />
environment or of a newly developed pesticide<br />
on the animal component of a forest<br />
stand. The importance of this capability for<br />
generalization is related to another recent<br />
phenomenon, the insistence that scientists<br />
provide immediate "best " answers to questions<br />
based on present available knowledge ;<br />
society is unwilling to wait for long periods<br />
for "final" solutions .<br />
These increased demands on the scientific<br />
community have to be met without the great<br />
increases in money and manpower experienced<br />
in the earlier postwar period . Since<br />
scientific resources are limited, they must be<br />
utilized more efficiently to meet society's<br />
needs for problem-solving information . Relevance<br />
and efficiency have become important<br />
considerations in planning and funding research<br />
programs .<br />
In many respects, the demands outlined<br />
above run counter to the traditional ways o f<br />
doing scientific research . Science has been<br />
strongly disciplinary in character with the<br />
greatest rewards going to the specialist who<br />
pursued his field in great depth . Even the applied<br />
scientist has tended to have a narro w<br />
focus looking, for example, at the effect of a<br />
cutting method on regeneration or thinning<br />
on wood yields, not at the overall effects of<br />
such treatments on ecosystems .<br />
From another viewpoint, science has been<br />
likened to an edifice of bricks gradually built<br />
up by the effort of many individual scientists .<br />
Unfortunately, there has been a strong tendency<br />
for each scientist to produce bricks of a<br />
dimension, shape, and material primarily of<br />
interest to him. Furthermore, at least in<br />
ecology, we have lacked overall blueprints for<br />
our edifices which would provide direction as<br />
to the kinds and number of bricks we need .<br />
There can be no questioning the need fo r<br />
strong basic research programs ; they are essential<br />
to the advancement of science and huma n<br />
knowledge. Traditional viewpoints and approaches<br />
do not adequately meet a great<br />
many of today's needs, however . .<br />
the scientific community is being<br />
forced to restructure a large part of its efforts ,<br />
partially from a sense of its own responsibilities<br />
and partially in response to society ' s<br />
pressures. Nowhere is this more evident than<br />
in the fields of natural resources and ecology .<br />
New programs are interdisciplinary effort s<br />
which try to overcome inadequacies in pas t<br />
research efforts . Resources are concentrated<br />
on critical areas related, either directly or in -<br />
4
directly, to solution of major natural resourc e<br />
problems .<br />
The Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome program i s<br />
one of these integrated, interdisciplinary efforts.<br />
It has as its overall objective an under -<br />
standing of how materials, such as water an d<br />
nutrients, and energy enter, move through ,<br />
and leave coniferous forest ecosystems, including<br />
both the terrestrial and aquatic components.<br />
The Biome program shares some<br />
common characteristics with many other larg e<br />
new ecological research programs : (1) It involves<br />
groups of scientists from many different<br />
fields working together toward some common<br />
goals. (2) It has a "systems" orientation ;<br />
it is concerned with all parts of the ecosystem,<br />
its total behavior, and the linkage s<br />
between the various components, not with a<br />
single piece . (3) Mathematical descriptions o r<br />
models of the various processes, subsystems ,<br />
and total ecosystem are a key to organizatio n<br />
and synthesis of the effort . Conceptua l<br />
models provide the framework for structuring<br />
the research effort and determining dat a<br />
needs. (4) Continuous communication between<br />
the scientist participants, including<br />
sharing of data, is an essential feature . The<br />
efforts progress via the constant interchange<br />
between scientists, between modeling and th e<br />
field and laboratory research .<br />
In our symposium, we will try to introduc e<br />
you to the kinds of research being conducte d<br />
under the auspices of the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong><br />
Biome . The papers range widely in scope fro m<br />
general presentations on the conceptual basi s<br />
for major program segments to results of relatively<br />
narrow research projects . Unfortunately,<br />
it is too early to provide any major<br />
synthesis of activities ; this summer will be the<br />
first field season of essentially full funding .<br />
We have tried to emphasize the new concepts ,<br />
techniques, and data which are emerging fro m<br />
the Biome's efforts . We hope that the<br />
"samples " of activities and philosophy which<br />
follow will make clearer what the Biome i s<br />
trying to do and how we are going about it .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The work reported in this paper was sup -<br />
ported in part by the U .S. <strong>Forest</strong> Service in<br />
cooperation with the Coniferous Fores t<br />
Biome, U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems, International<br />
Biological Program . This is Contribution<br />
No . 18 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome .<br />
5
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Organization and research program<br />
of the Western Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biom e<br />
An Integrated Research Component of th e<br />
International Biological Program<br />
S. P . Gessel, Directo r<br />
Western Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome<br />
College of <strong>Forest</strong> Resources<br />
University of Washingto n<br />
Seattle, Washingto n<br />
Abstract<br />
The International Biological Program was initiated in 1964. The Coniferous Biome research of the Analysis<br />
of Ecosystems component did not begin until October 1970 . Other Biome programs, with the exception of th e<br />
Tropical, preceded the Coniferous with the first research in the Grasslands Biome beginning in 1968 . The IBP<br />
research, originally planned to terminate in 1972, has been extended in the United States through 1974 . It is<br />
likely that the Analysis of Ecosystems program will be extended beyond that date in order to give the integrate d<br />
research approach an adequate test.<br />
This introductory paper describes the administrative and research organization of the Coniferous Biome and<br />
presents the broad objectives. Principal research sites and the plans for extension to other areas of the Biome are<br />
also described. As research is in the very early stages, progress can be best judged by reviewing other papers in thi s<br />
Symposium. Aside from accumulation ofdata and development ofmodels, we have made significant contributions<br />
to the education ofboth undergraduate and graduate students by introducing new modeling concepts .<br />
Introduction<br />
The International Biological Program (IBP )<br />
began in 1964 with the specific objective of developing<br />
a world study on the biological basi s<br />
of productivity and human welfare . The initiators<br />
were concerned with world-wide problems<br />
associated with increasing populations ,<br />
world food supplies, changes in environmenta l<br />
degradation, and increasing resource use .<br />
It was originally conceived as an 8-year pro -<br />
gram to be completed by 1972 . However, be -<br />
cause many national programs started late ,<br />
IBP has been extended through 1974. There<br />
are clear indications, however, that productiv e<br />
research programs such as the Biome effort s<br />
will continue beyond 1974 .<br />
The nature of IBP programs and rate of<br />
attainment of specific research objectives has<br />
been variable in the many participating countries.<br />
Rate of progress has been closely related<br />
to funds invested in the research . This discussion<br />
concerns the United States program and<br />
primarily those sections of the program under<br />
which Biome research falls. Our office will<br />
gladly supply interested scientists with references<br />
on the broader objectives and progra m<br />
of IBP .<br />
The United States IBP effort has evolved a s<br />
a series of large-scale, integrated research pro -<br />
grams coordinated by a national committee<br />
(sponsored by the National Academy of<br />
Sciences) and with the financial support of<br />
the National Science Foundation (NSF) .<br />
The Integrated Research Programs (IRP's )<br />
are in two broad groups :<br />
A. Human Adaptability<br />
1. International study of Eskimo s<br />
2. Population genetics of American Indian s<br />
3. Biology of human population at high<br />
altitudes<br />
7
4. Nutritional adaptation to environmen t<br />
5. Ecology of migrant peopl e<br />
B. Environmental Managemen t<br />
1 . Operating programs<br />
a. Convergent and divergent evolutio n<br />
in the Americas<br />
b. <strong>Experimental</strong> biography of the sea<br />
c. Physiology of colonizing specie s<br />
d. Atmospheric dispersal (aeriobiology<br />
program )<br />
e. Analysis of ecosystem s<br />
f. Conservation of ecosystems fo r<br />
scientific purposes<br />
g .<br />
Chemical and biological control o f<br />
organism s<br />
2 . Programs proposed but without funding<br />
a. Conservation of genetic material s<br />
b. Crop production under stress<br />
c. Productivity and conservation of<br />
marine mammals<br />
d. Nitrogen management<br />
e. Phenology<br />
U .S. IBP activities, particularly the Integrated<br />
Research Programs, provide a different<br />
focus for scientific inquiry ; i .e., integrated<br />
groups of scientists working toward solutio n<br />
of common problems instead of individual s<br />
working alone . The changes in focus have produced<br />
some trauma and a cadre of critics .<br />
Criticisms are still abundant but help to insur e<br />
better programs. Some critics say that integrated<br />
research efforts result in mediocre<br />
science, but program accomplishments mus t<br />
speak to this point now and in the future .<br />
Analysis of Ecosystems<br />
and th e<br />
Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome<br />
Having dealt with generalities of the total<br />
IBP, I now wish to explain briefly some specific<br />
parts of the total research effort. A s<br />
noted, the environmental management segment<br />
of U .S. IBP includes a subdivision calle d<br />
" Analysis of Ecosystems ." This is the largest<br />
and most active U .S . IBP program . It was originally<br />
conceived by Dr. Fred Smith of the<br />
University of Michigan, now at Harvard. The<br />
basic concepts involved are that world<br />
environments can be placed within broad<br />
units called Biomes and that integrated Biom e<br />
research efforts will provide the understanding<br />
for using and conserving the resources of<br />
that environment .<br />
Initially, the Analysis of Ecosystems pro -<br />
gram developed slowly . The Grassland Biome<br />
was organized first and has been a guide for<br />
other Biome programs . The total research<br />
effort will include the following Biomes :<br />
Grasslands Coniferous forest<br />
Desert<br />
Tundra<br />
Deciduous forest Tropical fores t<br />
Figure 1 illustrates the world environmenta l<br />
distribution of the Biomes .<br />
The first five Biomes are now functioning .<br />
The Tropical <strong>Forest</strong> Biome is still being organized;<br />
however, NSF is supporting tropical ecosystems<br />
research by such groups as the Organization<br />
for Tropical Studies .<br />
Figure 1 . Distribution of Biomes .<br />
The overall objectives of the Analysis of<br />
Ecosystems program are :<br />
1. To establish a scientific base for program s<br />
to maintain or improve environmenta l<br />
quality ;<br />
2. To derive broad principles of ecosyste m<br />
structure and function through an integration<br />
of the results of the six Biome studies ;<br />
3. To relate these principles to characteristic s<br />
of ecosystems such as persistence, stability ,<br />
maturity, and diversity ; and<br />
4. To develop and refine a generalized adapt -<br />
able simulation model suitable for use in<br />
8
planning studies for new developmen t<br />
projects .<br />
Generalized objectives of Biome researc h<br />
include :<br />
1.To determine the driving forces, the processes<br />
causing transfers of matter and energy<br />
among components, the nonconcentratio n<br />
characteristics, and the controlling variable s<br />
in each Biome ;<br />
2. To determine the ecosystem response t o<br />
the natural and man-induced stresses appropriate<br />
to each Biome ; for example, large<br />
herbivores in grasslands, extreme and rar e<br />
weather patterns in deserts, periodic fluctuations<br />
of rodent populations in tundra ,<br />
commercial use of timber in the coniferous<br />
forests, urbanization in the deciduou s<br />
forests, and nutrient retention in the wet<br />
tropical forests ;<br />
3. To understand the land-water interactio n<br />
characteristics of each Biome : Prairie pond s<br />
and reservoirs in the grasslands ; the abundance<br />
of shallow waters in wet tundra ;<br />
springs and temporary waters in deserts ;<br />
river and lake systems with anadromou s<br />
fish populations in coniferous forest ; pollution,<br />
and eutrophication in the deciduous<br />
forest; and large river systems in tropical<br />
forests; and<br />
4. To synthesize the results of these and previous<br />
studies into predictive models o f<br />
temporal and spatial variation, effects of<br />
pollutants and of exploitation, stability ,<br />
and other ecosystem characteristics necessary<br />
for resource management in eac h<br />
Biome .<br />
The Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome<br />
The history and research progress of ou r<br />
own Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome brings this discussion<br />
somewhat closer to home . Coincident<br />
with the development of an Analysis of Ecosystems<br />
program and the initial organizatio n<br />
and funding of the Grasslands Biome, a large<br />
body of scientists in forested areas of the<br />
West began discussing a Coniferous Fores t<br />
Biome. The University of Washington hoste d<br />
the group's first formal meeting at Pack<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> in February 1968 which produced a<br />
plan for development of a Biome research<br />
organization . The University of Montana<br />
helped to continue the discussions with a<br />
symposium on "Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong>s of the<br />
Northern Rocky Mountains " held at Missoula<br />
in September 1968 .<br />
In early 1969, I accepted an invitation to<br />
become the Director of the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong><br />
Biome . An organizational proposal for establishment<br />
of a skeletal office and development<br />
of a Biome research program was prepared<br />
and submitted to NSF .<br />
With these very limited funds and som e<br />
financial assistance from the Central Ecosystem<br />
office and the University of Washing -<br />
ton, and with a great deal of volunteer labor ,<br />
a research proposal was prepared and submitted<br />
to NSF on December 31, 1969 . The<br />
initial $460,000 request was scaled to fund s<br />
NSF had available. The proposal was approved<br />
but not funded until September 15 ,<br />
1970. We are, therefore, still in the very earl y<br />
stages of research . Even before the first proposal<br />
was funded, a second-year proposal wa s<br />
prepared and this, in turn, was funded at 1 . 2<br />
million dollars on January 1, 1972 . We are<br />
now preparing a proposal for 1973 and 197 4<br />
with a submission date of July 1 .<br />
Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome<br />
Organization and Research<br />
The Central Biome office is at the University<br />
of Washington's College of <strong>Forest</strong> Re -<br />
sources . Intensive research sites have been<br />
established on the H. J. <strong>Andrews</strong> <strong>Experimental</strong><br />
<strong>Forest</strong> of the U .S. <strong>Forest</strong> Service in<br />
the Oregon Cascade Range and the Cedar<br />
River watershed of the City of Seattle in th e<br />
Washington Cascade Range . Although many<br />
other areas had been nominated as potentia l<br />
research sites, these two were chosen because<br />
of their concentrations of available scientists ,<br />
developed facilities, history of research, an d<br />
ability to provide the types of research area s<br />
needed to accomplish the research goals of<br />
the Biome .<br />
The total Biome research program originally<br />
called for additional coordinating site s<br />
9
where validation studies could be carried out .<br />
Funds initially restricted development outside<br />
the intensive sites ; however, plans for coordinating<br />
programs, sites, and activities are no w<br />
being developed by the Extrapolation an d<br />
Application Committee under the direction o f<br />
Dr. William Laycock of the U .S. <strong>Forest</strong> Service.<br />
It appears that a diverse group of Biome -<br />
wide or coordinating site activities including :<br />
(1) major efforts to coordinate with other on -<br />
going ecosystem research programs in th e<br />
Biome; (2) cooperative studies of ponderos a<br />
pine ecosystems with the Grasslands Biome ;<br />
(3) examinations of fire and disease influences<br />
on coniferous forests ; and (4) validation o f<br />
some initial modeling efforts will develop .<br />
The Biome 's organizational structure use d<br />
in developing, organizing, and administerin g<br />
the research is shown in figures 2 and 3 . The<br />
overall Biome research plan is developed b y<br />
the Scientific Directorate, but the individua l<br />
research proposals are generated by the re -<br />
search committees . Yearly programs develop<br />
about as follows . First, research tasks or<br />
objectives are defined. Funding guidelines fo r<br />
each of these are also outlined based on total<br />
funding expected from NSF . Research committees<br />
then define specific subprogra m<br />
objectives and after agreement by the Scientific<br />
Directorate, the chairman of a researc h<br />
committee calls for proposals from the scientific<br />
community. Proposals are reviewed b y<br />
research committees and by the Scientifi c<br />
Directorate for task relevance and adequacy .<br />
Following revisions, deletions, and additions<br />
the proposals are incorporated into the Biom e<br />
proposal. A group of scientists from othe r<br />
Biomes review the draft of the Biome proposal<br />
before its final preparation and sub -<br />
mission to NSF .<br />
Objectives of Coniferou s<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Biome Research<br />
I will not attempt to detail the research i n<br />
this brief report, but I should comment o n<br />
the main objectives of all Biome research, i .e . ,<br />
development and validation of models of ecosystems<br />
function. The purpose of producing<br />
these models is to provide understanding o f<br />
coniferous ecosystems useful for management<br />
BIOME ADVISORY BOARDI DIRECTOR] -- ANALYSIS OF ECOSYSTEM S<br />
EXECUTIVE BOAR D<br />
{ CENTRAL OFFICE<br />
]<br />
[- TECHNICAL COMMITTEES -1<br />
Chemical Analyse s<br />
Remote Sensin g<br />
Genetic s<br />
Phenolog y<br />
Data Managemen t<br />
Internationa l<br />
DEPUTY DIRECTORS 1- EXECUTIVE DIRECTORATE<br />
SITE<br />
DIRECTOR S<br />
Terrestrial Division<br />
Aquatic Divisio n<br />
Ecosystem Integratio n<br />
Division<br />
SCIENTIFI C<br />
DIRECTORATE<br />
H . J . Andrew s<br />
Lake Washington Drainag e<br />
Validation Site s<br />
TRRESTRIAL DIVISIO N<br />
- ECOSYSTEM INTEGRATI<strong>ON</strong> DIVISIO N<br />
AQUATIC DIVISIO N<br />
Primary Production Modeling Management Lakes<br />
Food Chain Processes Interface Streams<br />
Biogeochemical Processes<br />
Extrapolation and Application<br />
Physical Processes<br />
Figure 2. Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome organizational chart .<br />
10
DIVISI<strong>ON</strong><br />
COMMITTEES AND SUBCOMMITTEE S<br />
PRIMARY PRODUCTI<strong>ON</strong> FOOD CHAIN PROCESSES BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLING PHYSICAL PROCESSE S<br />
TERRESTRIAL<br />
1 .<br />
2 .<br />
Processe s<br />
Biomass an d<br />
Structure<br />
1 .<br />
•2,<br />
Biologica l<br />
Geochemical<br />
1 .<br />
2 .<br />
Hydrolog y<br />
Meteorolog y<br />
LAKES<br />
STREAMS<br />
.-<br />
AQUATIC<br />
1 .<br />
2 .<br />
3 .<br />
Water Column Processe s<br />
Bottom Related Processe s<br />
Higher Consumer Processe s<br />
MODELING MANAGEMENT INTERFACES EXTRAPOLATI<strong>ON</strong> AND APPLICATIO N<br />
ECOSYSTE M<br />
INTEGRATI<strong>ON</strong><br />
Figure 3 . Research committees detail .<br />
and protection purposes . The following statement<br />
by Dr . Chapman, Deputy Director for<br />
Biome modeling activity, explains Coniferou s<br />
Biome modeling philosophy .<br />
The primary aim of this ongoing re -<br />
search is to increase our understanding<br />
of whole ecosystems within the Wester n<br />
Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome ; and to this<br />
aim an area of high priority is the development<br />
of models . . . with special emphasis<br />
on modeling of the aquatic-terrestrial<br />
interface .<br />
The analysis of an ecosystem shoul d<br />
begin by constructing models from existing<br />
data . The second step should be collection<br />
and analysis of data for testing an d<br />
refining the first models . This require s<br />
participating scientists to spend consider -<br />
able time thinking how their part of th e<br />
system relates to the rest and about general<br />
modeling processes. As the kinds of<br />
additional data that are needed are identified,<br />
scientists will be able to conduc t<br />
specific field studies designed to furthe r<br />
improve the models . This approach establishes<br />
a continual feedback loop .<br />
It is important, then, that participatin g<br />
scientists consider the understanding of<br />
systems modeling to be a major responsibility<br />
. The necessary modeling cannot be<br />
done by, say, a systems engineer, biometrician,<br />
or biomathematician . It will not<br />
be necessary for each participant to be -<br />
come a full-fledged system engineer or<br />
biomathematician (although it would be<br />
highly desirable if a few did so), but it will<br />
be essential that each participant re-orient<br />
his approach and philosophy somewhat ,<br />
for all should become systems modelers ,<br />
in one capacity or another .<br />
These points, made in our first proposal, can be<br />
reemphasized in other ways . In the first place ,<br />
every scientific study beyond simple observation<br />
involves some type of model-verbal ,<br />
graphical, or mathematical . The development<br />
of subsystem models is the responsibility of th e<br />
scientist doing the substantive research an d<br />
constitutes an essential part of their annual<br />
reports to the Biome . The modeling group provides<br />
support for those in need of modeling<br />
assistance and in fact has such a supportiv e<br />
function as one of its primary missions .<br />
The other primary mission of the modeling<br />
group is the development of the overall ecosystem<br />
model . This is one ultimate aim of th e<br />
Biome study, and while still at an early stage<br />
it will be possible to construct a total system<br />
computer model of low resolution . A better<br />
model will be achieved when reasonably<br />
sophisticated functional subsystem model s<br />
1 1
have been developed . Prior to their development<br />
the overall ecosystem model will be for<br />
the most part a translation of simple graphica l<br />
and verbal models into mathematical language<br />
with many aspects of the system interpolate d<br />
on the basis of empirical submodels or eve n<br />
crude estimates .<br />
Ultimately both total systems models an d<br />
submodels will require testing. This testing<br />
will indicate the further research needed to<br />
answer new questions or refine parts of existing<br />
models . The modeling team plays a role in<br />
assisting in the design of such new research. I n<br />
this way the model building plays an essentia l<br />
feedback role in the program .<br />
In addition, both subsystem models an d<br />
larger ecosystem models require estimates of<br />
parameters and available data often appear s<br />
inadequate. In these circumstances, it is neces -<br />
sary to test the sensitivity of the model to th e<br />
errors of estimation. Does it make a great deal<br />
of difference if the estimates are crude? If<br />
not, the model may proceed . If it does make a<br />
significant difference, additional observation s<br />
are required and further research in such area s<br />
is necessary. Obviously, such sensitivity tests<br />
cannot be made until models are fairly wel l<br />
developed ; some models will be at this stage<br />
this year.<br />
Specific Goals<br />
The goal of our Coniferous Biome research<br />
is development of a basic understanding of<br />
coniferous forest ecosystems, including both<br />
terrestrial and aquatic components, so tha t<br />
ecological constraints on and opportunitie s<br />
for increased production of fiber, food, water ,<br />
and wildlife can be recognized . The overall<br />
strategy includes identification of the majo r<br />
components and processes, both physical an d<br />
organic, within the ecosystem, and definition<br />
of their interrelationships . The definition of<br />
interrelationships will be accomplished<br />
through a systems analysis and modeling pro -<br />
gram . As an overall guide for Biome research ,<br />
we recognize the following general objectives :<br />
1. To determine the major factors, both components<br />
and processes, that control the<br />
productivity and distribution of organisms<br />
in coniferous forest ecosystems, includin g<br />
(a) an analysis of the structure and distribution<br />
of the principal resources, (b) definition<br />
of the functional relationships between<br />
biotic, decomposer, consumer, and<br />
producer components of the systems, an d<br />
(c) analysis of the forms and degrees of<br />
stability in these systems .<br />
2. To examine the linkage of terrestrial an d<br />
aquatic components in coniferous fores t<br />
ecosystems, including (a) water, energy ,<br />
and transport of chemicals (including pesticides),<br />
(b) direct transport of terrestrial<br />
products into the aquatic system, e .g. ,<br />
through litter fall and surface erosion, an d<br />
(c) return of organic and inorganic materia l<br />
from the aquatic to the terrestrial environment<br />
through movements of fish, birds ,<br />
and insects .<br />
3. To determine how various manipulation s<br />
influence the structure and function of<br />
coniferous forest ecosystems using bot h<br />
unit watersheds and plot studies . Special<br />
attention is directed to the influences of<br />
manipulations on (a) stability and productivity<br />
of these systems and (b) the linkage s<br />
between terrestrial and aquatic components<br />
of the systems.<br />
4. To understand population dynamics of<br />
those major components of each trophic<br />
level which appear to influence significantly<br />
the sustained productivity and stability<br />
of various coniferous forest ecosystems<br />
within the Biome .<br />
5. To produce models of temporal and spatia l<br />
variations in coniferous forest ecosystem s<br />
or system components. These models will<br />
include factors affecting productivity an d<br />
stability of the systems and the linkages between<br />
terrestrial and aquatic environments ,<br />
forecasting the behavior of these systems<br />
and their relationships to human manipulation<br />
.<br />
6. To apply to specific models in the solutio n<br />
of major use problems in the Biome are a<br />
and assist other groups or agencies to d o<br />
likewise .<br />
Since these long-term objectives provid e<br />
only general guidance, considerable time an d<br />
effort is spent in defining annual researc h<br />
tasks in order to focus the research an d<br />
12
modeling activities and provide a basis fo r<br />
phasing of the program .<br />
The specific research tasks planned for<br />
1973 and 1974 are to :<br />
1. Complete initial programs in terrestrial production<br />
process measurement and modeling,<br />
using both physiological and meteorological<br />
techniques, and link results to behavior<br />
(net productivity, transpiration ,<br />
etc.) of actual stands . Begin developing<br />
data for the production process models fo r<br />
other species and environments and for<br />
different age classes important in th e<br />
Biome, including linkages of individual tre e<br />
processes to behavior of stands .<br />
2. Develop elemental cycling models of forest<br />
stand level ecosystems based upon proces s<br />
and transfer functions such as decomposition,<br />
ionic leaching, weathering, organism<br />
uptake, storage, and return, and meteorological<br />
and biological additions . This will<br />
include stressed systems. This fine resolutio n<br />
work will serve as a basis for development o f<br />
unit watershed programs .<br />
3. Begin describing paths of energy and material<br />
flow through consumers (food webs) in<br />
coniferous ecosystems under study, wit h<br />
particular attention to movement and accumulation<br />
of toxic materials and consequen t<br />
effects of diversity, flow paths, and primar y<br />
producers .<br />
4. Complete initial nutrient, water, and energ y<br />
flow models for unit watersheds and begi n<br />
their refinement with particular attention to<br />
incorporation of process models . For selected<br />
compartments and transfers and i n<br />
simplified form, begin examining the abilit y<br />
of the watershed models to describe behavior<br />
of (a) larger drainages and (b) strongl y<br />
contrasting coniferous ecosystems across th e<br />
Biome, and to predict (c) system response s<br />
under various stresses and over long tim e<br />
spans (in connection with manipulation an d<br />
successional research) .<br />
5. Quantify and model paths and rates of material<br />
and energy transfers across terrestrial -<br />
aquatic interfaces, specifically includin g<br />
quantification of transfers in and comparisons<br />
between (a) undisturbed small stream s<br />
and small lakes, (b) lakes of various topolog y<br />
and climate, and (c) undisturbed and clear -<br />
cut watersheds with stream systems . In the<br />
comparisons of interface transfers in undisturbed<br />
and altered systems, study consequences<br />
of terrestrial disturbances on aquat -<br />
ic productivity and stability with initial<br />
emphasis on stream systems .<br />
6 . Evaluate and model the trophic dynamic s<br />
of four lakes of significantly different<br />
nutritional status, topology, and climate .<br />
Evaluation and modeling will be by way of<br />
three subdivisions of the aquatic system :<br />
(a) the water column, including the rapidly<br />
changing community of phytoplankton ,<br />
microbes, and zooplankton, (b) the<br />
benthos, including the moderately slowly<br />
changing community of larger plants, sediments<br />
and longer life span invertebrates ,<br />
and (c) higher consumers-long life spa n<br />
invertebrates and fish . Integrate these submodels<br />
into a total system productivity<br />
model that allows determination of importance<br />
of various internal and externa l<br />
nutrient sources to lake productivity an d<br />
suggests methods of management of productivity.<br />
Finally, explore opportunitie s<br />
for validation elsewhere .<br />
7. Examine responses of coniferous ecosystems<br />
or subsystems to selected stresse s<br />
(manipulations) in terms of material and<br />
energy flows and of productivity . This tas k<br />
is largely structured as validation of model s<br />
and will utilize existing as well as newl y<br />
acquired data. Manipulations may includ e<br />
(a) clearcutting, (b) fertilization, (c) addition<br />
of toxic materials (pesticides an d<br />
heavy metals), (d) addition to or remova l<br />
of nutrients from aquatic systems, and<br />
(e) burning .<br />
8. Examine long-term (successional) behavio r<br />
of coniferous ecosystems specifically including<br />
: (a) development of a successiona l<br />
model for prediction of forest compositio n<br />
and biomass changes, primarily by cooperation<br />
with the Deciduous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome an d<br />
acquisition of necessary data base for<br />
validation of the Oak Ridge model(s) ;<br />
(b) descriptions of selected subsyste m<br />
structures and processes across different<br />
forest age classes to test successional hypotheses<br />
regarding : (1) complexity and redundancy<br />
of detritus subsystems, (2) ratio<br />
13
of gross production and respiration, and<br />
(3) conservation of nutrients within the<br />
system ; (c) examination of eutrophication<br />
processes in lake systems using a series o f<br />
lakes of varying "ecological stage" (nutritional<br />
status) .<br />
Each of these tasks involves an integratio n<br />
of efforts by several discipline groups . Expanded<br />
and more rapid interchange betwee n<br />
discipline groups, specialists, and modelers ,<br />
and between interdisciplinary units workin g<br />
on different levels of resolution or systems, i s<br />
essential and will be pursued by all feasibl e<br />
methods. Expanded contact, including personnel<br />
exchange will be developed with othe r<br />
Biomes . Specific cooperative programs wit h<br />
the Deciduous Biome on succession and wit h<br />
the Grassland Biome on ponderosa pine -<br />
grassland systems are planned . Extension of<br />
program activities to a Biome-wide basis i s<br />
essential to the 1973-74 program .<br />
Progress<br />
The papers presented in this symposium<br />
will indicate to some extent the progress in<br />
Biome research . Something which perhap s<br />
will not be as apparent in the presentations i s<br />
our accomplishments in working together so<br />
that the total of our group research effort is<br />
greater than the sum of the individual parts . I<br />
believe some of our best progress has been i n<br />
getting terrestrial researchers to consider th e<br />
relationship of their work to aquatic components<br />
and how these systems interface. Th e<br />
same kind of crosslinks have been establishe d<br />
among different disciplines on each campu s<br />
involved in the study and perhaps even mor e<br />
important across state and county boundarie s<br />
between different institutions . The working<br />
relationships established between scientists at<br />
Oregon State University, the University o f<br />
Washington, and the U .S. <strong>Forest</strong> Service have<br />
been particularly outstanding. U .S. <strong>Forest</strong><br />
Service scientists, especially those in the<br />
Pacific Northwest <strong>Forest</strong> and Range Experiment<br />
Station, have made a major contributio n<br />
to the success of the program .<br />
For organizational and budget reasons w e<br />
have concentrated our research effort at tw o<br />
major sites, the Lake Washington-Cedar Rive r<br />
system and the H. J. <strong>Andrews</strong> Experimenta l<br />
<strong>Forest</strong>. We must depend upon research at<br />
these areas to provide the initial theory an d<br />
models. We do recognize the broad researc h<br />
responsibility embodied in the term Coniferous<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Biome and that we must expan d<br />
the base by carefully choosing additional site s<br />
for study and data accumulation in order to<br />
test models and theory . We also hope that<br />
researchers will use the principal research site s<br />
to validate models they may have develope d<br />
elsewhere .<br />
We are currently engaged in a study of th e<br />
entire Biome area for the purpose of selecting<br />
areas and projects which will extend Biom e<br />
research in an orderly and efficient manner .<br />
We are also developing inter-Biome research<br />
efforts which will enable us to exchange<br />
models and validation studies with all othe r<br />
Biomes .<br />
These remarks should serve to illustrate<br />
that the Coniferous Biome is in the early<br />
stages of a research program . Much of our effort<br />
so far has been related to organizing<br />
working groups, setting up general and specific<br />
research goals and then writing the necessary<br />
proposals . We hope the next 2 years can<br />
be devoted to the actual research and that in a<br />
similar meeting in 1974 we can demonstrate<br />
the success of the program .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The work reported in this paper was sup -<br />
ported in part by National Science Foundatio n<br />
Grant No . GB-20963 to the Coniferous Fores t<br />
Biome, U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems, International<br />
Biological Program . This is Contribution<br />
No . 19 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome .<br />
14
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Findley Lake the study of a<br />
terrestrial-aquatic interface<br />
P. R . Olson and D . W. Col e<br />
College of <strong>Forest</strong> Resources<br />
an d<br />
R . R . Whitney<br />
College of Fisheries<br />
University of Washingto n<br />
Seattle, Washingto n<br />
Abstract<br />
The linkage of the aquatic properties of a small lake to the terrestrial landscape is under examination in th e<br />
Findley Lake Basin of the Cedar River watershed. This pristine, 10 ha, oligotrophic lake is situated at 1,128 m<br />
elevation in a 162 ha watershed. During the initial year of investigation, this research program has focuse d<br />
primarily on a description of the ecosystem components. This initial phase of the program and the long-term<br />
objectives are discussed .<br />
Introduction<br />
Findley Lake is located in the upper portion<br />
of the Cedar River watershed in Kin g<br />
County, State of Washington . Cedar River<br />
watershed is the municipal watershed of th e<br />
City of Seattle and is one segment of the Lak e<br />
Washington watershed which is one of the intensive<br />
study sites of the Coniferous Fores t<br />
Biome, a portion of the United States Inter -<br />
national Biological Program (Gessel 1972) .<br />
A mission of the IBP is to demonstrat e<br />
how sound biological information can be<br />
synthesized and used in assessing alternatives .<br />
More specifically the Coniferous Fores t<br />
Biome addresses its attention to specific<br />
resource problems within the Biome . In general<br />
terms the Findley Lake interface study is<br />
directed to: better understanding of productivity<br />
and its maintenance on forest lands an d<br />
adjacent surface waters ; to determine the role<br />
of land and vegetation management in water<br />
quality and quantity ; and to measure the<br />
interaction of animal populations upon these<br />
areas .<br />
The City of Seattle Water Department ha s<br />
agreed to dedicate this entire drainage basin a s<br />
a research area for the IBP, Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong><br />
Biome program. This cooperation includes<br />
securing the timber rights of the property and<br />
developing access into the area which at th e<br />
present time is by trail . The intent at Findley<br />
Basin is to maintain the pristine environmen t<br />
and minimize human influence while conducting<br />
the research .<br />
Watershed Description<br />
Findley Lake is located at 1,128 m elevation<br />
in a cirque with a maximum elevation of<br />
1,450 m and a total acreage of 162 ha . The<br />
aquatic portion of the Findley Lake basi n<br />
consists of Findley Lake proper with an are a<br />
of 10 ha and two smaller ponds of abou t<br />
0.4 ha each. Figure 1 defines the drainage<br />
basins of each of the ponds and lakes . Findley<br />
Lake proper intercepts 60 percent of th e<br />
watershed, and the one shallow pond intercepts<br />
14 percent. The lower, deep pond inter -<br />
15
Figure 1 . Aerial photo of Findley Lake basin indicating<br />
drainage basin of upper lake and two smalle r<br />
ponds.<br />
cepts each of the other two basins as well a s<br />
26 percent of the watershed directly .<br />
The soils of the watershed have bee n<br />
mapped by Bockheim and Ugolini (n .d .) .<br />
Many of the slopes range from 30 to 40 percent<br />
; widespread talus accounts for 16 .2 percent<br />
of the total basin. Soils of mixed materials<br />
are divided as forested, semiforested, an d<br />
nonforested ; they account for 56 .2, 4 .3, an d<br />
1.6 percent, respectively, of the total basin .<br />
The residual soils on the ridges are 17 .5 percent<br />
forested and 4 .2 percent nonforested .<br />
Del Moral (1972) has completed a vegetation<br />
survey of the watershed . Seven vegetation<br />
types were distinguished and their distributions<br />
mapped . Most of the area is timbere d<br />
by relatively homogenous old-growth Pacifi c<br />
silver fir (Abies amabilis) .<br />
Taber' has conducted a preliminary survey<br />
of the terrestrial vertebrate activity in the<br />
1 P. R. Olson, J . S . Bockheim, F . C. Ugolini, an d<br />
others . A terrestrial-lake interface program, Findle y<br />
Lake watershed. Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome Interna l<br />
Report No . 25 . (In press .)<br />
watershed. The elk (Germs canadensis) and<br />
pikas (Ochotona princeps) have a noticeable<br />
impact on the vegetation of the basin . Migratory<br />
,vertebrates such as deer (Odocoileus<br />
hemionus), elk, and birds could influence the<br />
movement of nutrients in or out of the basin .<br />
In addition, the elk activity in some of the<br />
meadow areas has obviously disturbed th e<br />
soil .<br />
Snow accumulations of 4 m often occur i n<br />
the Findley Lake basin . The open surface<br />
period on Findley Lake is approximately 4<br />
months. The lake frequently is not free of<br />
snow cover until late July and usually start s<br />
to close about mid or late November. A thin<br />
layer of ice will often form in early November<br />
and soon thereafter, snowfall will cover th e<br />
surface. The snowfall accumulates rapidly and<br />
insulates the surface from additional freezing .<br />
The latent heat of the lake water thaws th e<br />
ice layer originally formed and the snowpac k<br />
effectively supports itself . As snow accumulates,<br />
the light penetration is greatly reduced .<br />
In February of 1972 there were 2 .9 m (9 . 5<br />
feet) of snow ; the light readings beneath th e<br />
snowpack were approximately 1 .4 lux-0 .0 3<br />
percent of the surface illumination . Th e<br />
oxygen concentration of the water colum n<br />
was close to saturation except within 2 m o f<br />
the bottom where the oxygen decrease wa s<br />
quite abrupt. Temperatures at this tim e<br />
ranged from 1 0 C at the surface to 3° C a t<br />
25 m .<br />
Limnological surveys were performed b y<br />
Welch (see footnote 1) on a monthly interval<br />
during the open summer period . Findley Lake<br />
is extremely clear with visibility extending to<br />
depths of 15 m . Since the lake is relativel y<br />
deep (about 28 m) and unproductive, th e<br />
hypolimnion during the summer period remained<br />
well oxygenated . Maximum water<br />
temperature noted at the lake surface durin g<br />
the surveys was 18° C . The dominant zoo -<br />
plankton found was Diaptomus shoshon e<br />
with a modest population of Holopedium<br />
gibberum present early in the season. Th e<br />
Diap torn us population persisted after 3<br />
months of snow cover .<br />
The analysis of water samples b y<br />
Spyridakis (see footnote 1) is covered mor e<br />
extensively by Taub et aL(1972). Mean values<br />
16
of the most pertinent variables were : total<br />
phosphorus 5 µg/2, orthophosphorus 1 µg/2 ,<br />
nitrate-nitrogen 3 pg/2, silica 76 pg/Q, calciu m<br />
1 mg/2, magnesium 0 .6 mg/2, sodium 1 mg/2 ,<br />
and potassium 25 µg/2 . Chlorophyll determinations<br />
were 0.3 pg/2 and primary production<br />
was 370 mg C/m 2 /day .<br />
Other surveys which are relatively complet e<br />
at this time are the paleoecological analysis by<br />
Tsukada (see footnote 1) of numerous 1 m<br />
long sediment cores . These cores are bein g<br />
analyzed for concentration of pollen ,<br />
diatoms, Cladocera, inorganic elements, an d<br />
organic chemicals including chlorophyll . Th e<br />
1 m cores were not sufficiently deep to give a<br />
complete record ; however, they did disclos e<br />
the fact that the surrounding environmen t<br />
had been disturbed at least twice in the recen t<br />
past. There was evidence of a fire with subsequent<br />
pollen change and, in a deeper portion ,<br />
a 500 percent rise in sedimentary chlorophyll .<br />
Longer cores will be necessary to explain thi s<br />
phenomenon . Soil profiles disclosed evidence<br />
of two relatively recent fires as well as three<br />
volcanic ash depositions .<br />
A macrobenthic invertebrate survey wa s<br />
taken by Paulson (see footnote 1) of the lake ,<br />
the ponds, and the interconnecting streams .<br />
May flies and caddis flies appear to be th e<br />
dominant consumers in the lake . May flies<br />
were represented by Baetidae and caddis flie s<br />
by two species of Limnephilidae . Midge larvae<br />
were present, two species of stone fly and als o<br />
Simuliidae in the creek . In addition a sphaeri d<br />
clam and a planorbid snail were found in fai r<br />
abundance . Three species of amphibians wer e<br />
abundant in the lake and pond : rough-skinne d<br />
newt (Taricha granulosa), western toad (Bufo<br />
boreas), and Cascades frog (Rana cascadae) .<br />
Less common were the northwestern salamander<br />
(Ambystonza gracile) and the Pacifi c<br />
treefrog (Hyla regilla) . All evidence to dat e<br />
indicates there are no fish present in the lake .<br />
Present and Future<br />
Program s<br />
Year one study on Findley Lake was primarily<br />
a survey year . The effort at present is<br />
directed at a continuation of the previou s<br />
research with a higher resolution to supply<br />
the necessary input to modelers . Studies will<br />
be intensified on nutrient availability and<br />
quantification of primary, secondary, an d<br />
tertiary production in both the terrestrial and<br />
aquatic environments .<br />
The objective of the proposed pedological<br />
study by Ugolini is to understand soil -<br />
weathering processes and their relations to th e<br />
b i o geochemical cycle. Gravitational water<br />
interconnects the atmospheric, biological ,<br />
lithological, and hydrological components of<br />
the biosphere, bringing the reactants together<br />
and transporting the end products to ne w<br />
sites. The very essence of soil formation is th e<br />
migration of ions and particulate matter . Prior<br />
to establishing the kinds and rates of migration<br />
it is necessary to acquire a knowledge o f<br />
the soil system in both its chemical an d<br />
mineralogical composition . Thus estimations<br />
of nutrient capital in soils and forest floor o f<br />
the Findley Basin will be determined .<br />
The common denominator throughout the<br />
entire ecosystem is water . Water input as<br />
precipitation will be determined and followed<br />
through the aerial portion of the system . Thus<br />
crown wash and stemflow analyses, both<br />
qualitative and quantitative, are essential as<br />
well as determination of litterfall rates . The<br />
elements of prime concern will be initially N ,<br />
Ca, Mg, K, and P . This aspect will be investigated<br />
by Cole and Gessel who will follo w<br />
water through the soil system collectin g<br />
leachates beneath the forest floor, at th e<br />
boundary between A and B horizons, beneat h<br />
the rooting zone in the C horizon and withi n<br />
the ground water table. Techniques used here<br />
will be similar to those previously reporte d<br />
for the Thompson Site (Cole and Gessel<br />
1968) .<br />
The surface water flow within the basi n<br />
will be surveyed and chemically analyzed b y<br />
Spyridakis. Many of the surface flows ar e<br />
temporary in nature associated with snow -<br />
melt; hence, the quantity of surface flow i n<br />
the upper system will not be critically deter -<br />
mined, but Wooldridge will quantify the<br />
hydrologic flow from the entire basin. Th e<br />
nutrient accumulation within the snowpack<br />
will also be determined .<br />
17
Nutrient levels in stream and lake water a s<br />
a function of seasonal variations and samplin g<br />
location will be determined by Spyridakis .<br />
Determinations will include temperature, conductivity,<br />
suspended and dissolved solids ,<br />
light penetration, turbidity, color, dissolve d<br />
O 2 , pH, soluble and particulate C, chemical<br />
oxygen demand, dissolved SiO 2 , Na, K, Ca ,<br />
Mg, Fe, Al, Mn, chloride, sulfate, bicarbonate ,<br />
and carbonate . In addition, the lake sediment s<br />
will be characterized and their contribution t o<br />
the overlying waters will be determined .<br />
Welch will determine the annual and seasonal<br />
primary production in the lake an d<br />
relate it to the available nutrients . Special<br />
attention will be directed to regulation an d<br />
control dictated by the elements which may<br />
be limiting. Attention will be directed to th e<br />
phytoplankton cell size and their utilizatio n<br />
by zooplankton . The zooplankton composition<br />
and biomass will be determined on a<br />
regular sampling schedule. The predatio n<br />
impact upon zooplankton will probably b e<br />
quite minimal, because of the lack of fish i n<br />
the system ; however, observations will b e<br />
made to determine the potential consumptio n<br />
by insects and amphibians . A consideration<br />
for the fourth year of study may be the introduction<br />
of cutthroat trout into the lowes t<br />
pond in the lake basin to determine th e<br />
impact of predation upon the secondary production,<br />
after a comparison of the pond t o<br />
the lake for a period of time .<br />
The contrast existing between the tw o<br />
ponds and the lake presents an interestin g<br />
study by itself. Both ponds are 0.4 ha in area<br />
but have different depth profiles . The upper<br />
pond is only 1 .5 m deep and with the loss of<br />
the snowpack in midsummer will cease to<br />
overflow and decrease to 1 .0 m in depth . The<br />
lowest pond has not been accurately sounde d<br />
but appears to be at least 10 m deep and continually<br />
receives the overflow from the upper<br />
lake. The shallow pond opens earlier in th e<br />
summer, has a higher heat budget, and freezes<br />
earlier in the fall. This contrast will provide an<br />
interesting comparison in studies of decomposition,<br />
lake bottom water interface, an d<br />
growth and reproduction of amphibians an d<br />
invertebrates .<br />
One of the concerns in the aquatic area is<br />
the self-sustaining capabilities within that are a<br />
and the rapidity of recharge when the syste m<br />
is limited in some important essential . Questions<br />
that have been asked repeatedly in th e<br />
past deal with the role or importance of<br />
decomposition in the aquatic system. The<br />
Findley Lake basin presents a unique opportunity<br />
to measure the dynamics of decomposition<br />
when light is abundant and when ligh t<br />
is greatly reduced or eliminated for a 6 month<br />
period by snow cover. Findley Lake will be<br />
used primarily as a comparison to the othe r<br />
three lakes in the system as discussed by Tau b<br />
et al. (1972) . The flux and pool sizes of<br />
carbon in the water column will be deter -<br />
mined by Lighthart from a compartment<br />
analysis of (1) dissolved inorganic carbon ,<br />
(2) phytoplankton, (3) zooplankton ,<br />
(4) dissolved organic carbon, (5) detritus, and<br />
(6) heterotrophic bacteria using a C 14 technique.<br />
This technique requires the measurement<br />
of primary productivity as the initial<br />
step in measuring exchanges between compartments.<br />
The role of the aerobic, facultative<br />
anaerobes, and anaerobic bacteria will be<br />
determined by Matches .<br />
The oxidation of organic matter in th e<br />
water column to be done by Packard will be<br />
estimated by means of an oxygen uptak e<br />
method measuring enzyme activity (Packard<br />
1969). By this method he will compare th e<br />
seasonal changes in respiratory activity o f<br />
phytoplankton and zooplankton . Pamatmat<br />
will determine the annual deposition of<br />
organic matter on the lake basin and its rat e<br />
of decomposition . This will be determined by<br />
placing in the sediment a bell jar equippe d<br />
with oxygen probe, thermistor probe, and a<br />
stirring mechanism (Pamatmat and Bans e<br />
1969). The oxygen loss will be monitore d<br />
with regard to time so that consumption rate s<br />
may be determined. This will be related to th e<br />
oxygen budget of the overlying water column .<br />
Estimates of the contribution of detrital<br />
biomass to the aquatic food chain will b e<br />
determined by Taub . This will involve th e<br />
biomass estimate, and its organic carbon ,<br />
organic nitrogen, and caloric contribution t o<br />
zooplankton, benthic invertebrates, an d<br />
amphibians . In addition, Taub will investigat e<br />
the biological aspects of nitrogen transforma -<br />
18
tions (Klucas 1969) . An overall nitrogen<br />
balance estimate will be determined from estimates<br />
of nitrogen fixation and denitrification .<br />
Attempts will also be made to determine th e<br />
transfer from detrital material such as chiti n<br />
and protein to the dissolved plant nutrien t<br />
ammonia . The interchange between the<br />
various dissolved states of nitrogen, ammonia ,<br />
nitrate, and nitrite will also be investigated .<br />
Discussion<br />
The Findley Watershed relates to the overall<br />
objectives of the Coniferous Biome i n<br />
three specific ways :<br />
1. It provides an excellent opportunity to<br />
study linkage between terrestrial processes<br />
and the limnological properties of a lake<br />
system. The research is designed to assign<br />
values to the rates and quantities of elemental<br />
and organic exchange between these<br />
systems .<br />
2. Findley Lake represents an extreme i n<br />
oligotrophic conditions in lake systems and<br />
should provide a very interesting genera l<br />
lake model. It will serve as an excellen t<br />
comparison with the lower three lakes o f<br />
the Lake Washington drainage basin in<br />
studies of nutrient income vs . productivity<br />
relationships. Consequently, it is a critical<br />
component of the four lake program of th e<br />
Coniferous Biome .<br />
3. Because of the similarity in terrestrial community<br />
structure between Findley Lake<br />
and some of the reference stands at th e<br />
Biome's H. J: <strong>Andrews</strong> Intensive Sit e<br />
(Gessel 1972), it provides a linkage between<br />
the two biome study sites . Th e<br />
effort at the <strong>Andrews</strong> Site will concentrat e<br />
on unit watershed models, which will include<br />
transpiration, terrestrial primary production,<br />
and stream hydrologic models, al l<br />
of which should have excellent applicatio n<br />
in the Findley watershed .<br />
To study the interface phenomenon ,<br />
Findley Lake has been diagrammatically stratified<br />
into a series of discrete ecosystem components<br />
connected by transfer functions .<br />
Figure 2 represents a first approximation of<br />
how these components are interconnected<br />
Figure 2 . Terrestrial-lake interface diagram with transfer<br />
functions numerically listed : (1) atmospheri c<br />
exchange, heat, light, water and gas; (2) nutrient<br />
assimilation; (3) nutrient leaching ; (4) hydrologica l<br />
output ; (5) consumption; (6) detrital contribution ;<br />
(7) decomposition ; (8) return from decomposition ;<br />
(9) movement across interface; (10) migration i n<br />
and out of watershed .<br />
and the nature of the linkage between th e<br />
terrestrial and aquatic systems . Each of the<br />
component boxes will necessitate a quantitative<br />
estimate of the biomass or effective<br />
reservoir involved . The pathways between<br />
components will not only involve a quantitative<br />
estimate but also a measure of rate o f<br />
movement between the components . As the<br />
research progresses, the level of resolution wil l<br />
become extremely critical before a total systems<br />
analysis is possible . A few important<br />
variables which will be kept in mind are :<br />
(1) spatial dimensions of the system under<br />
study, (2) time base of the study, and (3) th e<br />
nutrient elements and/or caloric equivalent s<br />
of the components . It is very likely that th e<br />
modeling effort will help prescribe a desirabl e<br />
time base .<br />
19
Acknowledgments<br />
The work reported in this paper was sup -<br />
ported by National Science Foundation Grant<br />
No. GB-20963 to the Coniferous Fores t<br />
Biome, U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems, Inter -<br />
national Biological Program . This is Contribution<br />
No . 20 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome ,<br />
IBP .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Bockheim, J . G., and F . Ugolini .[n .d.] Soil s<br />
and parent materials of Findley Lake ,<br />
Snoqualmie National <strong>Forest</strong>, Washington .<br />
Northwest Sci . : (In press . )<br />
Cole, D . W., and S. P . Gessel. 1968. Cedar<br />
River research-a program for studyin g<br />
pathways, rates and processes of elemental<br />
cycling in a forest ecosystem. 53 p . <strong>Forest</strong><br />
Resour. Monogr ., Univ . Wash. Contrib . No .<br />
4. Seattle .<br />
Del Moral, R . 1972. Vegetation survey o f<br />
Findley Lake Basin . Am. Midland Nat . : (In<br />
press .)<br />
Gessel, S . P. 1972. Organization and researc h<br />
program of the Western Coniferous Fores t<br />
Biome . In Jerry F. Franklin, L . J .<br />
Dempster, and Richard H . Waring (eds .) ,<br />
Proceedings-research on coniferous forest<br />
ecosystems-a symposium, p . 7-14, illus .<br />
Pac. Northwest <strong>Forest</strong> & Range Exp . Stn . ,<br />
Portland, Oreg .<br />
Klucas, R. V. 1969. Nitrogen fixation assessment<br />
by acetylene reduction . Eutrophicat<br />
i o n -B i o s timulation Assessment Work -<br />
shop. Proc. 1969 : 109-116 . Univ. Calif . ,<br />
Berkeley .<br />
Packard, T. T. 1969. The estimation of th e<br />
oxygen utilization rate in sea water fro m<br />
the activity of the respiratory electro n<br />
transport system in plankton . 115 p . Ph .D .<br />
thesis on file, Univ . Wash .<br />
Pamatmat, M. M., and K. Banse . 1969 .<br />
Oxygen consumption by the seabed . II. In<br />
situ measurements to 180 m depth .<br />
Limnol. Oceanogr. 14 : 250-259 .<br />
Taub, Frieda B., Robert L . Burgner, Eugene<br />
B. Welch, and Demetrios E . Spyridakis .<br />
1972. A comparative study of four lakes .<br />
In Jerry F . Franklin, L . J. Dempster, an d<br />
Richard H . Waring (eds .), Proceedingsresearch<br />
on coniferous forest ecosystems- a<br />
symposium, p . 21-32, illus. Pac. Northwest<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> & Range Exp . Stn ., Portland, Oreg .<br />
20
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
A comparative study<br />
of four lakes<br />
Frieda B . Taub ,<br />
Robert L . Burgner,<br />
Eugene B . Welch,<br />
an d<br />
Demetrios E . Spyridakis<br />
University of Washingto n<br />
Seattle, Washingto n<br />
Abstract<br />
It is increasingly evident from many unfortunate case histories that lake communities are sensitive in a<br />
variety of inadequately understood ways to watershed management practices and abuses . If we are to conserv e<br />
or manage our array of lakes of the Coniferous Biome successfully, we must gain a sufficient understanding t o<br />
predict the impact of various perturbations on the general lake community structure and production . Initial<br />
effort in the Coniferous Biome is being directed toward an intensive comparative study of an array of four lake s<br />
in a single watershed that provide a spectrum of human disturbance and manipulation . These are lakes<br />
Washington, Sammamish, Chester Morse, and Findley in the Lake Washington-Cedar River Drainage. A study of<br />
Cedar River, the main drainage system and a link between two of the lakes, contributes to both the lakes' stud y<br />
and the smaller stream investigations at <strong>Andrews</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> .<br />
The Place of Lake Studies<br />
in the Biome<br />
It may well be asked why there should be<br />
an intensive study of lakes within a C<strong>ON</strong>IF-<br />
EROUS BIOME . Certainly, the biome is<br />
named for the most conspicuous organisms ,<br />
the terrestrial conifers . However, it can be<br />
shown that aquatic studies and the terrestrial<br />
studies each have much to gain by being<br />
combined .<br />
Unlike the European IBP, the US IBP chose<br />
to combine the initial working groups for<br />
Freshwater Productivity and Terrestrial Productivity.<br />
It was anticipated that this approach<br />
would best encourage truly biome -<br />
wide studies, not artificially divided b y<br />
discipline boundaries, such as the Findle y<br />
Lake study which is discussed in the previou s<br />
paper. This Biome also includes studies of th e<br />
marine contribution to freshwater and terrestrial<br />
communities by anadromous fish .<br />
Limnologists have long recognized that th e<br />
terrestrial influences on lakes are of utmos t<br />
importance. The physical characteristics of a<br />
lake are determined largely by its topology<br />
and climate which will determine the degree<br />
and frequency of mixing. It had long been<br />
thought that lakes progressed from oligotrophic<br />
to eutrophic as an inevitable<br />
sequence . Margalef (1968) and Odum (1969 )<br />
have suggested that lakes will progress towar d<br />
increased oligotrophy if the surrounding lan d<br />
does not contribute nutrients . Thus the majo r<br />
successional pattern of a lake may be determined<br />
by the terrestrial input .<br />
The nutrient inputs to a lake are very largely<br />
determined by the nature of the soil, the<br />
land use, and the amounts and patterns of<br />
water flow within the drainage basin . Since<br />
the major nutrient inputs may be made by the<br />
streams, rather than by shore drainage, events<br />
quite some distance from the lake can exert<br />
major effects. The Biome study provides<br />
greater opportunity for evaluating terrestria l<br />
21
inputs into the lakes . Recent studies have<br />
shown this kind of information to be necessary<br />
in considering effects of land use .<br />
The terrestrial scientists should not be unmindful<br />
of the effect that aquatic bodie s<br />
exert on the surrounding land mass . Man 's<br />
needs for water have resulted in virtually all<br />
civilizations developing in proximity to rive r<br />
drainage basins . Locally, the impact of water<br />
on man's land use is also obvious . Seattle<br />
developed into a major city because of it s<br />
location and port facilities on Puget Sound .<br />
Lake Washington has had an impact o n<br />
Seattle by preventing growth eastward in a<br />
contiguous fashion . A great desire for water -<br />
front property has prompted the developmen t<br />
of homes and parks all along its shore front ,<br />
and therefore brought about the necessity o f<br />
bridges and major road systems to permi t<br />
residents of the east shore to have convenien t<br />
access to Seattle . Similarly, the existence o f<br />
Lake Sammamish and its recreational an d<br />
esthetic assets have created the developmen t<br />
of parks, communities, and therefore, roads ,<br />
along its shore . Because Chester Morse Lak e<br />
serves as a water supply for Seattle, the entir e<br />
watershed of this lake has been fenced off an d<br />
been inaccessible to the public for 60 years .<br />
Land use has been restricted to controlle d<br />
logging designed so as to protect wate r<br />
quality. Within the Chester Morse watershed ,<br />
Findley Lake has been protected incidentally .<br />
Aquatic bodies also influence terrestrial<br />
communities by the frequency and extent o f<br />
floods. The temptation to build on level land<br />
has resulted in construction on flood plain s<br />
and the subsequent need for dams and othe r<br />
flood control measures . These in turn have<br />
altered the terrestrial environment and th e<br />
potential uses of the land .<br />
The distribution of terrestrial wildlife is<br />
also influenced to a very great extent by th e<br />
availability of the water supply . A host of<br />
water birds collect their food from the water<br />
but otherwise nest and conduct the nonfeeding<br />
parts of their lives on the land . In addition,<br />
there are animals such as otters (Lutra<br />
canadensis), racoons (Procyon lotor), and<br />
bears (Ursus spp.), which take a rather substantial<br />
amount of their food from aquatic<br />
bodies, especially after the salmon spawning .<br />
Over geological timespans, water has a<br />
major impact on the land . The streams an d<br />
rivers are major sculptors of the terrestrial<br />
topology. Lakes are not merely a sink for up -<br />
land nutrients but may become the source o f<br />
future land . Much of our prime agricultura l<br />
land is lake fill . The occurrence of peat in th e<br />
local drainage system gives further evidenc e<br />
that much of our present land was previousl y<br />
occupied by an aquatic community .<br />
Characteristics of the<br />
Four Lakes<br />
The four lakes in the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong><br />
Biome 's Cedar River intensive site-Washington,<br />
Sammamish, Chester Morse, and<br />
Findley-provide contrasting conditions (fig .<br />
1) . The physical parameters of the lakes are<br />
shown in table 1 .<br />
1. Lake Washington (fig . 2), the lowermost<br />
lake, has a documented history of eutrophication<br />
and recent sewage diversion .<br />
The dominant fish is the anadromous<br />
sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka)<br />
which was introduced about 30 years<br />
ago . Other anadromous and resident fis h<br />
populations also occur here. The lake is<br />
used intensely for recreation, including<br />
sports fishing . The shores of the lake are<br />
largely urbanized .<br />
2. Lake Sammamish (fig . 3) represents an<br />
intermediate condition, as it was oligotrophic<br />
until very recently, underwent<br />
limited eutrophication as the forest wa s<br />
replaced by an increasing urban community,<br />
and is currently undergoing<br />
sewage diversion. The response of this<br />
lake to sewage diversion has been substantially<br />
less dramatic than that of Lake<br />
Washington . Surprisingly, the hypolimnion<br />
is anerobic much of the summer .<br />
Some of the same fish species, includin g<br />
sockeye salmon, occur here as in Lak e<br />
Washington, but in smaller numbers .<br />
This lake drains into Lake Washington<br />
from the north via Sammamish Slough .<br />
3. Chester Morse Lake (fig . 4) is the upper -<br />
most of the two large lakes in the Ceda r<br />
River watershed . Although the lake level<br />
22
Figure 1 . Map of Lake Washington drainage.<br />
Table 1.--Physical characteristics of lakes in Lake Washington drainage basi n<br />
Lake<br />
Maximum<br />
depth<br />
Mean<br />
depth<br />
Water<br />
Area Volume Length Elevation exchange<br />
tim e<br />
m m km 2 km 3 km m years<br />
Findley 30' 10 1 0.09 0.0009' 1,13 1<br />
Chester Morse 35 13 .0 6.54 .085 8 .1 473 0 . 3<br />
Sammamish 31 17 .7 19 .8 .350 12 .9 12 2. 2<br />
Washington 64 33.0 87 .6 2 .884 31 .5 8 .6 3 .0<br />
' Tentative values .<br />
2 3
was slightly raised in 1902, the lake in<br />
other respects is the least disturbe d<br />
major lake in the state . Access to th e<br />
lake has been rigidly controlled sinc e<br />
1911 and no fish have been planted o r<br />
harvested since that time. It contains no<br />
anadromous fish, but has resident populations<br />
of rainbow (Salmo gairdneri) ,<br />
Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma), and<br />
whitefish (Prosopium sp .) . The shore is<br />
completely undeveloped .<br />
4. Findley Lake (fig . 5) is among several<br />
small lakes in a totally unmanipulate d<br />
watershed . It and its watershed are being<br />
used in an integrated terrestrial-aquati c<br />
study . The land area consists of undisturbed<br />
mature coniferous forest. Th e<br />
lake has no resident fish population bu t<br />
has zooplankton and salamanders i n<br />
moderate abundance .<br />
Specific tasks of the lake-stream study in<br />
the Lake Washington-Cedar River watershe d<br />
include assessment of (1) terrestrial influences,<br />
including forest and urban land use ,<br />
(2) nutrient budgets, (3) sources of energy t o<br />
support the food chain, (4) community structure<br />
and metabolism, (5) effects of food avail -<br />
ability on successive trophic levels, (6) effects<br />
of fish on lower trophic levels, (7) effects o f<br />
anadromous fish on other fish populations ,<br />
and (8) outputs to the marine community b y<br />
anadromous fish .<br />
Research Program<br />
In 1971, fieldwork was initiated on chemical<br />
budgets, primary and secondary productivity,<br />
and fish populations, in coordinatio n<br />
with other concurrent studies. A literature<br />
compilation of past aquatic studies in th e<br />
watershed was completed and the transfer o f<br />
pertinent data to the IBP data bank initiated .<br />
A major hydrological study of the lake-river<br />
system was initiated by another agency<br />
(R I B C O, River Basin Coordinating Committee)<br />
. Decomposer studies were organized<br />
in conjunction with the terrestrial program. A<br />
preliminary interface study on Findley Lake<br />
watershed was accomplished . A generalized<br />
trophic level model was developed and its<br />
shortcomings were analyzed . Modeling efforts<br />
on existing data from other lakes wer e<br />
initiated by the modeling group .<br />
In 1972 the fieldwork mentioned above ha s<br />
been expanded and fieldwork on decomposition<br />
and nutrient regeneration processes has<br />
been initiated . Field effort and modeling<br />
structures are reorganized into subsystems o f<br />
bottom related processes, water colum n<br />
processes, and higher consumer dynamics .<br />
Models of optimum strategies and density<br />
dependent relationships are being developed .<br />
Detailed descriptive models of the lakes wil l<br />
be completed . Data sets at potential extrapolation<br />
sites are being identified and a<br />
coordination framework was established .<br />
In 1973 the full field program will continu e<br />
with phasing and evaluation of specific<br />
studies, including elimination of those whic h<br />
have either met their objectives or which are<br />
not profitable lines of pursuit . Greater<br />
emphasis will be placed on using hydrologica l<br />
data and interfacing with terrestrial aspects of<br />
the program as well as on perfecting sub -<br />
system models and linking them together int o<br />
a more complete model . Coordination with<br />
extrapolation site programs will be increased ,<br />
including data set analysis .<br />
In 1974, successful and fruitful program s<br />
will be continued as necessary, with phasin g<br />
of research in many instances to accomplish<br />
tasks deferred for orderly sequential progression<br />
under limited funding . Major efforts wil l<br />
be directed to integration of all work and to<br />
use of extrapolation data for model validatio n<br />
and generalization of intensive site results .<br />
Focus of Research Program<br />
The stream-lake study will address a number<br />
of questions) which have relevance to<br />
both science and analysis of environmenta l<br />
impacts. These questions are concerned with :<br />
(1) the mechanisms by which purely physica l<br />
constraints, such as structure of lake basin,<br />
These questions and the subsystem models have<br />
been developed with the help of the modeling group .<br />
Mr. Larry Male of the Center for Quantitative<br />
Science, University of Washington, is particularl y<br />
acknowledged for his contributions to these ideas .<br />
24
OUTLE T<br />
PINS<br />
LANE<br />
LYIMIIMP<br />
MICOGS<br />
LANE<br />
LAKE IAMMAMIS H<br />
DEPTH IN EETEA 1<br />
LAKE WASHINGTO N<br />
DEPTH IN METERS<br />
o 2 ..<br />
0 I E km Figure 3 . Map of Lake Sammamish .<br />
Ip►OIA N<br />
<strong>ON</strong>EER<br />
Figure 2 . Map of Lake Washington .<br />
Figure 4. Map of Chester Morse Lake. Figure 5 . Map of Findley Lake .<br />
25
climate, surrounding terrestrial environment ,<br />
prevailing winds, lake circulation dynamics ,<br />
rates of water and inorganic nutrient inflow<br />
and outflow, and chemical precipitation of<br />
essential nutrients control the productivity ,<br />
water quality, and community structure of<br />
aquatic ecosystems ; (2) the dynamics of nutrient<br />
and energy cycling through both biological<br />
and physical processes ; (3) the<br />
mechanisms by which community structure<br />
may inhibit or enhance overall productivity<br />
and water quality ; (4) the response of complex<br />
aquatic ecosystems to a variety of<br />
natural and artificially created disturbances ;<br />
and (5) the mechanisms these systems have<br />
evolved for coping with these disturbances .<br />
The nature of these questions justifies th e<br />
coordinated program which is planned. Some<br />
of the questions this program will bear upo n<br />
and how they intend to be tackled will now<br />
be discussed .<br />
The phytoplankton and bacterial communities<br />
in lakes not only provide the basis fo r<br />
complex food webs, they essentially contro l<br />
the overall water quality and the apparent<br />
state of eutrophication . The sustained abundance<br />
and species composition of the bacterial<br />
and phytoplankton communities depend<br />
to a large extent upon the rate at whic h<br />
they are supplied with essential inorganic<br />
nutrients and energy sources. Most of these<br />
compounds are introduced from the surrounding<br />
terrestrial environment and the<br />
atmosphere through biological fixatio n<br />
processes . The rate at which a lake is supplied<br />
with allochthonous materials may determin e<br />
its productivity structure . Several mechanisms<br />
may be responsible for determining a lake' s<br />
response to allochthonous nutrient input .<br />
These mechanisms relate both to the suppl y<br />
of nutrients to the phytoplankton and bacteria<br />
communities and to the physical an d<br />
biological forces which influence the production<br />
dynamics of these communities .<br />
1 . Dynamics of release of inorganic nutrients<br />
from allochthonous organic material<br />
of varying nutrient richness : The first indication<br />
is that nutrients in nutrient<br />
poor organic material, e .g., wood, are released<br />
slowly. Since the four lakes in thi s<br />
study can be characterized by the nature<br />
and extent of allochthonous input, thi s<br />
mechanism can be studied .<br />
2. Nutrient availability as a function o f<br />
thermal distribution, circulation dynamics,<br />
and cycling dynamics of other chemical<br />
compounds : Vertical density gradients<br />
(determined by vertical therma l<br />
distribution gradients) can control th e<br />
availability of essential nutrients to autotrophic<br />
organisms . The density gradient s<br />
function as a barrier to the mixing o f<br />
nutrients from deeper waters into th e<br />
productive surface waters . Since the<br />
density barrier also inhibits the passag e<br />
of oxygen from the surface into th e<br />
deeper waters the deeper waters some -<br />
times become depleted of oxygen . Thi s<br />
anerobic condition enhances the solubility<br />
of compounds which bind phosphorus<br />
in forms unavailable to phytoplankton<br />
. Thus, the deep waters may be<br />
rich in nutrients which are relatively unavailable<br />
to autotrophic organisms . Th e<br />
four lakes in this study vary greatly i n<br />
the formation of their density gradient s<br />
and thus their capacity to trap nutrients .<br />
This theory is only partially applicabl e<br />
to any particular lake since there exis t<br />
other mechanisms for distributing nutrients.<br />
The shape of the lake basin, direction<br />
and strength of prevailing winds ,<br />
internal circulation currents, disturbanc e<br />
of the bottom sediments by mechanica l<br />
mixing, and dynamics of nutrient trans -<br />
port through the reduced layer of th e<br />
sediment are all mechanisms which ar e<br />
being studied to bear upon the proble m<br />
of nutrient cycling .<br />
3.Biological cycling of nutrients : Since the<br />
communities of phytoplankton and bacteria<br />
in lakes are often limited by the<br />
availability of essential nutrients they<br />
have tended to evolve elaborate mechanisms<br />
for the conservation and recyclin g<br />
of nutrients. In the absence of these<br />
mechanisms, production would mos t<br />
likely be nil. Nutrients cycle through<br />
communities of phytoplankton, zoo -<br />
plankton, bacteria, protozoans, and<br />
littoral aquatic plants. The nature of<br />
these cycles and how they operate with -<br />
26
in the restrictions of the physical environment<br />
are being tackled . Since the<br />
four lakes in this study have evolved to<br />
their present structure in the presence of<br />
different nutrient stresses we might<br />
expect them to exhibit various capacitie s<br />
to conserve and cycle nutrients .<br />
4. Effect of community structure on productivity<br />
and distribution of energy : Th e<br />
production of herbivores (zooplankton )<br />
cannot be explained entirely by production<br />
of primary producers (phytoplankton).<br />
The physical form of the production<br />
(i.e., size distribution or colonia l<br />
form of algal cells) may preclude consumption<br />
by zooplankton . However ,<br />
zooplankton may in fact contribute to<br />
changes in the physical form of primar y<br />
production by being size-selective<br />
feeders. Since changes in the form an d<br />
species composition of phytoplankto n<br />
communities are indices of pollution an d<br />
eutrophying environments this process i s<br />
being investigated .<br />
In the same way that changes in th e<br />
physical form of phytoplankton production<br />
may control the production of zoo -<br />
plankton, the community structure, siz e<br />
distribution, and spatial distribution o f<br />
zooplankton control the feeding behavior<br />
and subsequent production o f<br />
predators .<br />
The terminal link in the food web of three<br />
of the study lakes is the community of fis h<br />
species . Much literature has been devoted to<br />
models which try to explain the populatio n<br />
dynamics of these organisms without incorporating<br />
their interaction with the environment<br />
. The communities of fish can influenc e<br />
the nature of production by altering th e<br />
community structure of other vertebrate an d<br />
invertebrate communities upon which the y<br />
feed and indeed may alter the entire community<br />
(Hurlbert et al . 1972). Their own production<br />
dynamics are related to the structure<br />
and abundance of the prey communities an d<br />
also to mortality dynamics which are deter -<br />
mined by the state of the physical environment<br />
at critical life stages . Three projects wil l<br />
bear upon the questions related to the fis h<br />
community .<br />
Presently, a three submodel system (figs . 6<br />
and 7) is being used to develop the propose d<br />
field studies ; these are organized around water<br />
column, bottom related, and higher consumer<br />
processes . These subsystems were chose n<br />
because the couplings within each are mor e<br />
tightly linked and the span-of-time resolution s<br />
OVERALL SYSTE M<br />
Figure 6 . Overall system categories.<br />
LAKE SUBSYSTEM (C)<br />
NIGHE R<br />
C<strong>ON</strong>SUME R<br />
DYNAMIC S<br />
(C? ,<br />
Figure 7. Lake subsystem categories.<br />
27
more similar than between the different subsystems<br />
. For example, the processes in the<br />
water column involving exchanges betwee n<br />
nutrients, algae, shortlived zooplankton, and<br />
bacteria can better be handled by a singl e<br />
team than by several teams, each interested i n<br />
a specific trophic level. Further, this information<br />
may have to be handled on a daily o r<br />
hourly basis, whereas the higher consumer<br />
production, e .g., fish, will be handled on a<br />
seasonal basis .<br />
Studies Planned for 1973-74<br />
The individual studies tentatively planne d<br />
for 1973 and 1974 for the four lakes are<br />
shown in table 2 . These are described briefl y<br />
here. The interface study specific to th e<br />
Findley Lake watershed is described in th e<br />
previous paper .<br />
Water Column Process Studie s<br />
The categories and relationships are show n<br />
in figure 8. Much of the past work in th e<br />
Cedar River drainage lakes defined the annua l<br />
nutrient supply to Lake Sammamish an d<br />
Figure 8 . Categories and relationships of sub-syste m<br />
(C)a ; water column processes .<br />
documented its rate of recovery compared t o<br />
that of Lake Washington as a result of nutrient<br />
diversion. Recently, limnological conditions<br />
have been monitored in Chester Mors e<br />
and Findley Lakes to compare their trophi c<br />
character with that of Lakes Sammamish an d<br />
Washington . Ultimate objective is to develop a<br />
model with enough generality to encompas s<br />
the range in trophic character now observabl e<br />
among the lakes .<br />
Lake Washington responded rapidly to a<br />
diversion of over one-half its annual supply o f<br />
phosphorous . Edmondson (1970) has documented<br />
its recovery to a trophic state simila r<br />
to that recorded over 20 years ago in a matte r<br />
of only 3 years after the completion and 7<br />
years after the beginning of sewage diversion .<br />
Lake Sammamish, a mesotrophic lake wit h<br />
similar flushing time, located only 10 miles t o<br />
the east of Lake Washington, has no t<br />
responded noticeably in 3 years following<br />
nutrient diversion . Possible reasons for this<br />
difference in rate of response involve th e<br />
morphometry of the two lakes .<br />
The nutrient input to the lake and the<br />
levels of dissolved inorganic nutrients will b e<br />
related to the growth and production of<br />
phytoplankton and its consumption by zoo -<br />
plankton . These studies will be in sufficient<br />
detail to examine changes in species composition<br />
and the importance of size categories a s<br />
they may relate to optimum feeding strategies.<br />
More detailed, but less frequent estimates<br />
of the flow of carbon through all<br />
components of the food web will be made by<br />
the techniques of Saunders (1969) usin g<br />
radioactive bicarbonate, radioactive detritus ,<br />
and radioactive dissolved organics . Both of<br />
these field-oriented studies will be correlate d<br />
with the modeling on the dynamics of nutrient<br />
distribution and flow through aquatic ecosystems.<br />
A deferred study concerns the rol e<br />
of fungal parasites on algae to explore the<br />
hypothesis that algal blooms may cease<br />
through disease processes, rather than throug h<br />
the limitation of nutrients .<br />
The mathematical models which have been<br />
developed to explain the production dynamic s<br />
of phytoplankton production admit that the<br />
concentration of phytoplankton may vary continuously<br />
from the surface to the lake bottom .<br />
28
Table 2.-Proposed lake studies (by investigator and abbreviated title )<br />
Aquatic Director: R. L . Burgner<br />
Lake Studies : F. B. Taub, Chairman<br />
Department University Study<br />
Water Colum n<br />
(E. B. Welch, Chairman )<br />
1. E. B. Welch Civil Engineering Univ. Washington<br />
P. R. Olson <strong>Forest</strong> Resources Univ. Washington<br />
Zooplankton-productio n<br />
2 . E. B . Welch Civil Engineering Univ. Washington Phytoplankton-production<br />
3. B. Lighthart Inst. Freshwater Studies Western Washington Carbon web<br />
4. B. Lighthart Inst. Freshwater Studies Western Washington Bacteria<br />
5. T. Packard Oceanography Univ. Washington Oxidation-respiratio n<br />
6. F . B. Taub Fisheries Univ. Washington<br />
J. T. Staley Microbiology Univ. Washington<br />
Nitrogen transformation<br />
7.*D. E. Spyridakis Civil Engineering Univ. Washington<br />
R. F. Christman Civil Engineering Univ. Washington<br />
Nutrient budgets<br />
Bottom-Related Processes<br />
(D. E. Spyridakis, Chairman)<br />
8. D. E. Spyridakis Civil Engineering Univ. Washington<br />
R. F. Christman Civil Engineering Univ. Washington<br />
Nutrient budget s<br />
9. F . B. Taub Fisheries Univ. Washington Detrital inpu t<br />
10. J. R. Matches Fisheries Univ. Washington Bacterial decomposition<br />
11. M. M. Pamatmat Oceanography Univ. Washington Oxidatio n<br />
Higher Consumers<br />
(R. R. Whitney, Chairman )<br />
12. R. L. Burgner Fisheries Univ. Washington<br />
Limnetic fis h<br />
R. E. Thorne Fisheries Univ. Washington<br />
13. A. C. DeLacy Fisheries Univ. Washington Limnetic fish feed<br />
14. R. S. Wydoski Fisheries Univ. Washington<br />
Benthic-littoral fis h<br />
R. R. Whitney Fisheries Univ. Washington<br />
*See also Bottom-Related Processes.<br />
29
The net rate of primary production at any<br />
particular depth depends upon the temperature,<br />
light intensity, essential nutrient concentration,<br />
and zooplankton grazing pressure a t<br />
that depth. The vertical distribution an d<br />
abundance of phytoplankton is thus a functio n<br />
of varying net production, sinking rates of algae<br />
and mixing dynamics of the water column . Th e<br />
total production per unit area of lake surfac e<br />
may be obtained by integrating the concentration<br />
of phytoplankton from top to bottom .<br />
The next step is to incorporate the size selective<br />
feeding of zooplankton and determine it s<br />
effect upon production (since algal cells o f<br />
different sizes possess varying capacities t o<br />
absorb nutrients) .<br />
The effective grazing rate by zooplankto n<br />
is modeled as a function of the phytoplankton<br />
density (at high densities the zooplanktons<br />
feeding structures become saturated) .<br />
The efficiency of assimilation of phytoplankton<br />
by zooplankton is also allowed to depen d<br />
upon algae abundance (efficiency decrease s<br />
with increasing abundance) .<br />
The overall model relating the phytoplankton,<br />
zooplankton, and nutrients is a system o f<br />
partial differential equations (in time and<br />
depth) .<br />
The submodel describing the physical<br />
cycling of nutrients (developed in the botto m<br />
related processes group) is an integral part of<br />
the phytoplankton, zooplankton submodels .<br />
The number and kinds of heterotrophi c<br />
bacteria will be assessed to give some information<br />
on the constancy of community structure<br />
of the decomposers . The utilization an d<br />
ultimate destruction of fixed organic material<br />
for the entire system will be estimated by<br />
respiration studies and verified by substrat e<br />
disappearance . The respiration an d<br />
heterotroph abundance values will also be correlated<br />
with the regeneration of nutrients .<br />
The nutrient budget and effective concentrations<br />
will be assessed . All of the above studie s<br />
will be carried out in units of biomass or wil l<br />
be convertible to biomass and units of carbo n<br />
by calculation of size distribution. Determinations<br />
of the magnitude of nitrogen transformation<br />
within each of the above compartments,<br />
as well as the search for evidence nitrogen<br />
fixation and its opposite process, denitri -<br />
fication, will be made .<br />
The detailed carbon cycle through th e<br />
phytoplankton, zooplankton, bacteria and<br />
pools of dissolved inorganic carbon, dissolved<br />
organic carbon, and detritus are bein g<br />
modeled initially with a varying rate compartment<br />
system. The rates of flow between th e<br />
compartments are to be functions of light ,<br />
temperature, and P0 4 and NO 3 concentrations.<br />
Later the rates will also be modeled a s<br />
functions of 0 2 and Si concentration. Thi s<br />
model will allow an analysis of what paths o f<br />
the cycling process limit the rate of<br />
production .<br />
Bottom Related Process Studie s<br />
The compartments are shown in figure 9 .<br />
The necessary chemical analyses to assess thi s<br />
aspect of the nutrient budget will also be<br />
done. Inputs of detrital materials to the sediments<br />
and their potential incorporation int o<br />
higher food chains via bottom invertebrates t o<br />
the fish will be assessed . The oxidation of<br />
organic material will be assessed by respiration<br />
rates of the sediments. The disappearanc e<br />
of substrates such as cellulose and chitin an d<br />
information on the bacteria associated wit h<br />
Figure 9 . Categories and relationships of sub-syste m<br />
(C)b ; bottom related processes.<br />
30
these processes will be measured and correlated<br />
with nutrient regeneration and respiration<br />
rates. The production of littoral material s<br />
will be assessed and compared with limneti c<br />
production and terrestrial inputs . The combined<br />
information on limnetic, benthic, an d<br />
littoral photosynthesis and respiration wil l<br />
permit comparisons of P/R ratios for th e<br />
various lakes within this study as well as fo r<br />
wider comparisons .<br />
A sophisticated theoretical model describing<br />
the complex physical and biological cycle s<br />
of inorganic nutrients has been proposed . Thi s<br />
model incorporates the features of densit y<br />
gradients as a barrier to mixing, circulatio n<br />
currents, chemical precipitation of essentia l<br />
nutrients, transport and release of nutrient s<br />
from the bottom sediments as a function o f<br />
0 2 concentration, pH, and bacterial decomposition,<br />
nutrient input in organic and in -<br />
organic form from allochthonous sources, an d<br />
atmospheric input through biological fixatio n<br />
processes . This theoretical model will be mad e<br />
more precise and useful by formulating it as a<br />
collection of well-defined assumptions an d<br />
mathematical equations. This model wil l<br />
allow an analytic comparison of the cyclin g<br />
processes in the four lakes .<br />
Higher Consumer Process Studie s<br />
Compartments are shown in figure 10 . Th e<br />
measurements of population parameters o f<br />
young sockeye and other limnetic feeding fis h<br />
will provide comparative data on seasona l<br />
changes in numbers, biomass, growth, an d<br />
mortality rates relative to possible controllin g<br />
factors, including recruitment, physical an d<br />
chemical environment, food availability an d<br />
characteristics, behavior and competition ,<br />
predation and other removal . Characteristics ,<br />
habits, and interactions of the benthic an d<br />
littoral fish will be studied . Study of th e<br />
benthic food supply will be temporarily deferred.<br />
The interaction between the benthi c<br />
and littoral fish and the limnetic feeding fis h<br />
is receiving emphasis . In all cases, there will b e<br />
a search for understanding of feeding strategies<br />
and growth dynamics as they influenc e<br />
community structure of the zooplankton an d<br />
fish .<br />
Figure 10 . Categories and relationships of sub-syste m<br />
(C)c; higher consumer dynamics .<br />
The vast food webs, typical of lake ecosystems,<br />
seem to be so complicated as to defy<br />
description . The higher consumers not only<br />
respond physiologically to their surroundin g<br />
physical environment, they exhibit complex<br />
behavioral mechanisms to cope with changin g<br />
food supplies and varying physical conditions .<br />
A conceivable model for this system is a varying<br />
rate compartmental model where the rate s<br />
of transfer among various species depend o n<br />
the physical environment . Another approach<br />
which is finding favor among theoretical<br />
ecologists is the theory of optimal strategies .<br />
The essences of this theory is that selective<br />
processes and adaptive mechanisms tend t o<br />
produce populations of organisms which<br />
strive to maximize their energy intake subjec t<br />
to the physical restrictions imposed by the<br />
environment and their own physiological an d<br />
morphological limitations . If the community<br />
structure of the prey organisms available to a<br />
predator is known then a mathematical representation<br />
of an optimal strategy model wil l<br />
predict the amounts and kinds of prey a<br />
predator will ingest. Coupled with models<br />
which describe the mortality structure of<br />
populations the optimal strategy model will<br />
effectively handle the questions concernin g<br />
31
community structure and energy flo w<br />
dynamics .<br />
It is obvious the subsystems above are artificial<br />
and that coordination of techniques an d<br />
measurements is necessary. For example, th e<br />
nutrient budget of the lake cannot be developed<br />
without the water column and th e<br />
bottom processes information, nor without<br />
the hydrological studies being coordinated<br />
with RIBCO and assessment of nutrien t<br />
sources .<br />
The present (1972) studies are necessarily<br />
descriptive, to supply the material for the firs t<br />
rough models . As the inadequacies of the<br />
crude models become apparent during the<br />
course of 1972, there will be increasing inter -<br />
play between the modeling and the field<br />
investigations and programs correspondingl y<br />
modified .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The work reported in this paper was sup -<br />
ported in part by National Science Foundation<br />
Grant No . GB-20963 to the Coniferous Fores t<br />
Biome, U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems, International<br />
Biological Program . This is Contribution<br />
No . 21 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Edmondson, W. T. 1970. Phosphorous nitrogen<br />
and algae in Lake Washington after<br />
diversion of sewage . Science 169 : 690-691 .<br />
Hurlbert, Stuart H., Joy Zedler, and Deborah<br />
Fairbanks . 1972. Ecosystem alteration b y<br />
mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) predation .<br />
Science 175: 639-641 .<br />
Margalef, Ramon. 1968. Perspectives i n<br />
ecological theory. 111 p., illus. Chicago ,<br />
London: Univ . Chicago Press .<br />
Odum, Eugene P . 1969. The strategy of ecosystem<br />
development . Science 164 :<br />
262-270 .<br />
Saunders, George W . 1969. Some aspects of<br />
feeding in zooplankton . In Eutrophication ,<br />
p. 556-573. Nat. Acad. Sci., Washington,<br />
D.C .<br />
32
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
The modeling process relating to<br />
questions about coniferous<br />
lake ecosystems<br />
A bstract<br />
Douglas M . Eggers<br />
Fisheries Research Institute<br />
University of Washingto n<br />
an d<br />
Larry M . Mal e<br />
Center for Quantitative Scienc e<br />
University of Washingto n<br />
The role of sound conceptualization and meaningful questions in the modeling process is discussed . Th e<br />
salient features of lake communities are reviewed. Included are factors which must be considered in answering<br />
questions involving the higher consumers of lake ecosystems .<br />
Before attempting an analytical model on e<br />
must conceptualize the system being modeled .<br />
If one 's conceptualization is good, then one is<br />
able to ask relevant and meaningful questions .<br />
Since ecosystems are infinitely complex, on e<br />
must make assumptions and simplifications in<br />
constructing analytical models which are with -<br />
in our capabilities . Because of these assumptions<br />
and simplifications it is impossible t o<br />
construct general ecological models-a general<br />
model being one which will answer or anticipate<br />
all questions. Therefore models must be<br />
constructed relevant to specific questions .<br />
A set of meaningful questions should be th e<br />
foremost component in the strategy which a<br />
worker adopts in the construction of a model .<br />
These questions allow the modeler to make set s<br />
of assumptions and simplifications which mak e<br />
a model both meaningful and workable .<br />
Considering a coniferous lake ecosystem, if<br />
one is interested in questions of seasonal succession<br />
of phytoplankton or perhaps, more<br />
long-term successional changes along a gradient<br />
lake nutrient level, then one must construct<br />
models which differentiate the algae with<br />
respect to species . This model must incorporate<br />
algal adaptive mechanisms to critical resources .<br />
On the other hand, if the question is one of<br />
primary production, then it may be worthwhile<br />
to construct models where the algae are lumpe d<br />
together into a uniform mass of quasi -<br />
organisms . This is a fundamental assumption of<br />
the Riley et al. (1949) model . But without<br />
species differentiation a means of handling the<br />
interesting questions in ecology of competition,<br />
predation, selection, and adoption i s<br />
destroyed .<br />
The following are some of the factors w e<br />
have considered in developing our conceptua l<br />
framework of a coniferous lake ecosystem .<br />
The structure and dynamics of the salient<br />
features of aquatic communities are reviewed .<br />
Attention is given to processes which hav e<br />
traditionally been neglected in quantitative<br />
models .<br />
Generation times in the algae are short .<br />
Thus the selection process may be rapid . This<br />
can give rise to rapid shifts in the species composition<br />
of phytoplankton as the environment<br />
changes (Hutchinson 1967) . Because of seasonal,<br />
diurnal, temporal and other spatial<br />
patterns of environmental change, selectio n<br />
processes are in a continual state of flux . The<br />
patchiness in spatial distribution of the organisms<br />
plus interruption in selection processes<br />
by continually changing environmental<br />
conditions, allows many species to coexist i n<br />
the lake ecosystem . The state of being th e<br />
33
est adapted organism vacillates betwee n<br />
species with time as the environment changes .<br />
The level of nutrients in a lake ultimatel y<br />
determines the level of phytoplankton whic h<br />
the lake can support . Nutrients are utilized b y<br />
plants as components of structural molecules ,<br />
such as DNA, RNA and enzymes . If nutrien t<br />
levels are in excess of structural demands an d<br />
other conditions are favorable for photosynthesis,<br />
then reproduction can occur . Nutrient s<br />
are rare elements in lake ecosystems, very<br />
eutrophicated lakes being exceptions . Aquati c<br />
communities have evolved many mechanisms<br />
fOr their conservation (Pomeroy 1970) . Algae<br />
and littoral plants can absorb nutrients almos t<br />
instantaneously from the water . Aquatic plants<br />
can take up nutrients as they are available and<br />
store them until conditions become more suit -<br />
able for growth when the nutrients are utilized .<br />
Light and temperature conditions necessary for<br />
photosynthesis are much more predictable ,<br />
with definite seasonal and diurnal patterns ,<br />
than nutrient levels, which the algae cells en -<br />
counter more or less randomly . Then, from the<br />
viewpoint of algae, a good strategy to evolve<br />
would be a means of acquiring nutrient s<br />
whenever they occur and wa iting to make use<br />
of them until sufficient light and temperature<br />
conditions (these are predictable) prevail .<br />
In addition to being able to utilize nutrient s<br />
as they occur, the phytoplankton-zooplankto n<br />
community recycles nutrients rapidly . As th e<br />
algae die and sink to the bottom, nutrients are<br />
released in two ways . Autolytical release occurs<br />
by simple diffusion. Mechanical release occurs<br />
when the cell membrane ruptures . Betwee n<br />
25 and 70 percent of the nutrients containe d<br />
in a sinking, dead organism are released i n<br />
these ways (Johannes 1968) .<br />
Zooplankton eat substantial proportions o f<br />
the algae . Herbivores are large in relationship<br />
to their food supply . Since zooplankton are<br />
eating a rich source of essential nutrients ,<br />
they consume many more nutrients than they<br />
need for structural components. The excess is<br />
simply excreted into the water .<br />
The classical role of bacteria, as the principal<br />
agents of nutrient regeneration is questioned<br />
by Johannes (1968) and Pomeroy<br />
(1970). Bacteria accumulate nutrients ove r<br />
the level required in growth, as algae do .<br />
Johannes (1968) believes that protozoa, ofte n<br />
neglected as important organisms in lak e<br />
systems, are responsible for regeneratin g<br />
nutrients by eating bacteria and excreting th e<br />
excess nutrients .<br />
In addition to biological means of nutrient<br />
cycling, many purely physical processes affec t<br />
nutrient distribution in lake systems . Nutrients<br />
enter the lake through the inflow (both surface<br />
flow and seepage) and precipitation . Nutrients<br />
leave the lake through outflow (both surface<br />
flow and seepage) . Sediments are very important<br />
in the nutrient budgets of lakes . They may<br />
act as a trap for essential nutrients, such a s<br />
phosphorous. The phosphorous is tied up b y<br />
iron and precipitated out at high redox potentials.<br />
Decreasing redox potential usually ac -<br />
companies decreasing oxygen concentration .<br />
When the redox potential falls below a certain<br />
level the phosphorous goes into solution, there -<br />
by becoming available to photosynthesizers i n<br />
the waters above . In oligotropic lakes th e<br />
redox potential is always high and phosphorous<br />
bound in falling detritus is lost to th e<br />
system when it reaches the sediments . Th e<br />
cycling of nitrogen is more complicated an d<br />
even more intimately tied in with the redo x<br />
potential . The rate at which essential nutrients<br />
are recycled through the community, interchanged<br />
with the sediments, and lost and<br />
replenished through inflow and outflow deter -<br />
mines the productivity of the lake . The<br />
response of this system to perturbation, measured<br />
not only by the level of productivity but<br />
by changes in community structure, is th e<br />
central theme of our research effort .<br />
Production is usually defined as the total<br />
elaboration of organic matter by photosynthetic<br />
organisms in a specified time period ,<br />
while productivity is the production per unit<br />
time. Photosynthetic rate depends principall y<br />
upon light intensity, temperature, and essential<br />
nutrient concentration (Riley 1946 ,<br />
Rhyther 1956, Tailing 1961) . Photosynthetic<br />
rate is different for different species of alga e<br />
(Talling 1955) . The production under a uni t<br />
area of lake surface is the sum over species o f<br />
the integral with respect to time and depth o f<br />
the algae densities times their respectiv e<br />
photosynthetic rates . The above generalization<br />
may appear overly simple ; however, the<br />
34
complexity of lake productivity will become<br />
apparent.<br />
The exponential decay of light intensity is<br />
a function of depth . Temperature varies with<br />
depth . Although factors leading to lake stratification<br />
are well understood, the construction<br />
of predictive models for temperature distributions<br />
in lakes has only recently begun . Light<br />
intensity varies with time, because of seasonal<br />
and diurnal patterns plus changing weathe r<br />
conditions . There are vertical currents due t o<br />
advection and eddy diffusion in lakes (Rile y<br />
et al . 1949) . These currents cause temperature,<br />
nutrient concentrations, and the population<br />
densities to vary with time . We must als o<br />
consider feedback mechanisms such as selfshading<br />
(Tailing 1960), and local depletion of<br />
nutrients by algae .<br />
Another interesting feedback mechanis m<br />
involves the relation between phytoplankto n<br />
and zooplankton densities . The rate of grazing<br />
on phytoplankton is determined by zooplankton<br />
density and its relative grazing rate (Riley<br />
1947) . On the other hand, the relative grazing<br />
rate of zooplankton is a function of phytoplankton<br />
density ; a saturated grazing rate is<br />
reached at high algal population densities<br />
(Holling 1959, Riley 1947) . Zooplankton also<br />
influence nutrient availability by excretin g<br />
soluble nutrients into the water .<br />
In addition to the limnetic plankton communities,<br />
there are, in lake ecosystems, littoral<br />
communities and, in areas deeper tha n<br />
maximal light penetration, benthic communities.<br />
The processes that occur in these communities<br />
are somewhat different than in th e<br />
limnetic community . Littoral communities<br />
are similar to terrestrial communities in many<br />
respects . Emergent and floating forms have<br />
access to atmospheric carbon dioxide . Attached<br />
forms have direct access to nutrients<br />
held in the sediments ; whereas, limnetic algae<br />
are free floating and must depend upon larg e<br />
ratios of surface area to volume and upo n<br />
passive sinking for efficient nutrient absorption.<br />
In littoral areas, herbivores are small ,<br />
relative to plant size . They consume little of<br />
the plant biomass. Littoral plants show seasonal<br />
die back, with much material being de -<br />
composed . As in terrestrial systems, bacteri a<br />
and detritus feeders are the primary agents of<br />
nutrient regeneration .<br />
Hutchinson and Bowen (1950), in a radiophosphorous<br />
study, showed that littoral<br />
plants can soak up and hold a large quantity<br />
of nutrients . Thus limnetic and littoral plant s<br />
do compete for nutrients . The littoral plants<br />
are less efficient than algae in absorbing nutrients<br />
because of their smaller ratio of surfac e<br />
area to volume . The littoral system's ability to<br />
hold nutrients (because of slow nutrient re -<br />
generation by bacterial decomposition an d<br />
relatively small grazing pressure) offsets inefficient<br />
nutrient absorption. Phytoplankton ,<br />
because of their short life span and hig h<br />
predation rate, cannot hold nutrients as long<br />
as littoral plants, but they are very efficient in<br />
absorbing nutrients .<br />
Deep benthic communities are made up o f<br />
detritus feeders that feed upon seston rainin g<br />
down from the productive epilimnion . They<br />
may be important in nutrient regeneration<br />
(Johannes 1968) . These animals constitute<br />
important food sources for higher orde r<br />
consumers .<br />
A promising theory which may be of great<br />
help in generating and answering question s<br />
about higher consumers, is that of feeding<br />
strategies. For a review of a substantial literature<br />
on the subject, see Schoener (1971) . The<br />
essence of the theory of feeding strategies i s<br />
that selective processes tend to produce populations<br />
of organisms which strive to maximiz e<br />
their energy (essential nutriment) intake .<br />
Predators may accomplish this end in severa l<br />
ways; however, it appears reasonable that i t<br />
would pay to eat the largest prey or the easiest<br />
to capture whenever they are encountered ,<br />
chasing relatively small difficult-to-catch prey<br />
only as a last resort . It is currently being<br />
demonstrated that this theory applies to a<br />
large variety of animals. The consequence is<br />
that one is able not only to predict the foo d<br />
habits of individual species but also to estimate<br />
their growth dynamics .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The work reported in this paper was supported<br />
by National Science Foundation Grant<br />
GB-20963 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome ,<br />
35
U .S . Analysis of Ecosystems, International<br />
Biological Program . This is Contribution No .<br />
22 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome, IBP .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Holling, C. S. 1959. Some characteristics of<br />
simple types of predation and parasitism .<br />
Can. Entomol . 91 : 385-398 .<br />
Hutchinson, G. E. 1967. A treatise on limnology.<br />
Vol. II. Introduction to Lake<br />
Biology and the limnoplankton . 1115 p . ,<br />
illus. New York : John Wiley & Sons .<br />
and V. T. Bowen. 1950 . Limnological<br />
studies in Connecticut . IX . A<br />
quantitative radiochemical study of th e<br />
phosphorous cycle in Linsley Pond . Ecology<br />
81 : 194-203 .<br />
Johannes, R . E . 1968 . Nutrient regeneration<br />
in lakes and oceans . In M . R . Droop and E .<br />
J. F. Wood (eds .), Advances in microbiology<br />
of the sea, Vol. I, p . 203-213 . New<br />
York : Academic Press .<br />
Pomeroy, L. R. 1970 . The strategy of mineral<br />
cycling . In Annu. rev. of ecol. and syst. ,<br />
Vol. I, p. 171-190. Palo Alto : Annu. Rev . ,<br />
Inc .<br />
Rhyther, J . H. 1956 . Photosynthesis in the<br />
ocean as a function of light intensity .<br />
Limnol. & Oceanogr . 1 : 61-70 .<br />
Riley, G . A. 1946. Factors controlling phytoplankton<br />
populations on Georges Bank . J .<br />
Mar . Res . 6 : 54-72 .<br />
1947 . A theoretical analysis o f<br />
the zooplankton population on George s<br />
Bank . J. Mar. Res . 6: 104-113 .<br />
, H. Stommel, and D . F. Bumpus .<br />
1949. Quantitative ecology of the plankto n<br />
of the western North Atlantic . Bull .<br />
Bingham Oceanogr. Coll. 12 : 1-169 .<br />
Schoener, T. W. 1971. Theory of feeding<br />
strategies . In Annu. rev. of ecol. and syst . ,<br />
Vol. II, p. 369-404 . Palo Alto : Annu. Rev . ,<br />
Inc .<br />
Talling, J. F. 1955. The relative growth rates<br />
of three plankton diatoms in relation t o<br />
underwater radiation and temperature .<br />
Ann. Bot. 14 : 329-341 .<br />
1960 . Self-shading effects in<br />
natural populations of a planktonic diatom .<br />
Wett. Leben 12 : 235-242 .<br />
1961 . Photosynthesis under<br />
natural conditions . Ann. Rev. Plant<br />
Physiol. 12 : 133-154 .<br />
36
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Toward a general model structur e<br />
for a forest ecosystem<br />
W. Scott Overto n<br />
Professor, Departments of<br />
Statistics an d<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Management<br />
Oregon State University<br />
A primary objective of the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong><br />
Biome is the development of a family o f<br />
models for a forest ecosystem as a whole . Thi s<br />
paper will discuss the general structures an d<br />
forms which represented our views toward th e<br />
end of 1971 . It is emphasized that these ar e<br />
evolutionary ; at least part of the value of thi s<br />
paper is as a record of the path we took i n<br />
model development . The value of these structures<br />
in furthering ecosystem theory is als o<br />
argued .<br />
Thus, a primary focus of this paper is wit h<br />
respect to ecosystem research at the "tota l<br />
system" level, that is, concerning the ecosystem<br />
as an object . It is another goal of ecosystem<br />
research to study the relations amon g<br />
component parts and further to study th e<br />
system properties of those parts . Populations ,<br />
communities, assemblages, food chains, productivity<br />
processes, and many other sub -<br />
system structures are of interest, in their ow n<br />
right, as are the functional and relationa l<br />
aspects of these structures . In fact, one of th e<br />
great difficulties in modeling the ecosystem as<br />
a (single) object is the strong tendency to<br />
perceive the ecosystem as an assemblage o f<br />
poorly defined subsystems such that th e<br />
couplings are vague, at best, and often entirely<br />
undefined . Model structures are developed<br />
which, it is hoped, will contribute t o<br />
elaboration of these subsystem concepts, a s<br />
well as the concept of the total system as<br />
object.<br />
A brief statement of my view of models ,<br />
and of their role in science seems desirable .<br />
Any particular model for a real world system<br />
(or object) can be decomposed into a set o f<br />
statements regarding that object . Some of<br />
these statements will be definitive, some wil l<br />
represent firm knowledge about the object ,<br />
and some will be in the form of infirm knowledge<br />
or simplifications (which statements w e<br />
usually call assumptions) . If we consider th e<br />
collection of all possible models for an object ,<br />
then the set of all statements of definition<br />
and all statements of firm knowledge represent<br />
all that is known about the object, s o<br />
that at this level the model, the canonical<br />
model, is identical to the state of knowledge<br />
about the object .<br />
Working models usually emphasize som e<br />
elements of knowledge and neglect others, s o<br />
that in practice the models we use are some -<br />
thing less than "complete ." However, most<br />
working models represent, in a very real way ,<br />
the knowledge and theory of a real world<br />
system . Some subset of the total knowledge i s<br />
coupled with some set of simplifying assumptions<br />
and the collection given a form an d<br />
structure by a mathematical or relational<br />
algorithm or convention . The process puts th e<br />
present knowledge into a new form . If th e<br />
new form serves to increase the understandin g<br />
of the system, then the modeling operation i s<br />
37
successful .<br />
Thus we can see modeling as the impositio n<br />
of structure on existing knowledge . As such ,<br />
it is a joint activity between those familia r<br />
with forms and structures and those familiar<br />
with a body of knowledge . In time, the structure<br />
imposed becomes integrated into th e<br />
scientific paradigm of the object, providin g<br />
new insight and a base for extending concepts<br />
. In this view, modeling is an integra l<br />
part of the theoretical advance of a subject<br />
science, not an external, nor peripheral ,<br />
activity engaged in by mathematicians o r<br />
other specialists .<br />
Now I don 't think that I am the only on e<br />
with this view, but there are sufficiently man y<br />
opposing views among modelers and sufficiently<br />
many misconceptions among subjec t<br />
specialists that verbalization of this perspective<br />
is essential in an introduction of th e<br />
present topic . I view our efforts to develop a<br />
total ecosystem model as a contribution to<br />
the scientific paradigm of ecosystems . Ou r<br />
primary activity as modelers is the conceptualization<br />
of theoretical ecosystem structure s<br />
and behavior. The present paper deals wit h<br />
the structural aspects of a developing family<br />
of models for the forest ecosystem at a date<br />
late in 1971, and with the strategy we have<br />
adopted to pursue our objectives .<br />
Approaches to System<br />
Theory and Definition<br />
Klir (1969, 1972) discusses in some detail a<br />
variety of definition forms and approaches t o<br />
developing a general theory of systems . This<br />
seems a productive direction and the following<br />
section is my own interpretation and<br />
elaboration of these passages in Klir . There<br />
may be inadvertent deviations from Klir 's<br />
intent .<br />
The State Variable (or State Space) approach<br />
seems to describe the model structur e<br />
currently most popular in several fields, including<br />
ecology . The essence of this approac h<br />
is that the system is defined as a set of variables,<br />
the state variables, and a set of variable s<br />
representing the environment, in a particular<br />
temporal resolution . A popular version de -<br />
fines compartments, with the state variable s<br />
describing the contents of the compartments .<br />
The definition is completed by specificatio n<br />
of algorithms for change of the state variables<br />
in time .<br />
Klir has proposed a general systems theory<br />
which, although not distinct from the stat e<br />
variable approach, has certain features whic h<br />
apply nicely to study of ecosystems . Specifically,<br />
he identifies five ways in which a<br />
system may be defined :<br />
1. By the set of external quantities and th e<br />
resolution level<br />
2. By the given activit y<br />
3. By the permanent behavio r<br />
4. By the Universe-Coupling structure<br />
5. By the State-Transition structure<br />
The models of the system follow definitio n<br />
forms 3, 4 and 5 . Definition form 1 is used in<br />
the planning stages of a modeling or data<br />
collection activity, and a collection of data i s<br />
a realization of definition form 2. It follows<br />
that definition form 1 is implied by form 2<br />
and by forms 3, 4, and 5. When applied to th e<br />
same system, the forms must be mutually<br />
consistent . In the Coniferous Biome, we hav e<br />
adopted a particular combination of the thre e<br />
model forms for our model of the forest ecosystem.<br />
We view each system (or subsystem )<br />
as modeled at two levels :<br />
1. Holistically, according to its Behavior (o r<br />
State-Transition structure) .<br />
2. Mechanistically, according to its Universe-Coupling<br />
structure .<br />
That is, we view Klir ' s Behavior and S-T<br />
structure as useful forms for characterizing<br />
the holistic behavior of a system "as a n<br />
object," and consider that such holistic characterization<br />
is necessary for each define d<br />
system or subsystem . Further, we consider<br />
that in most cases we will also wish to model<br />
the system according to the U-C Structure ,<br />
that is, as a collection of subsystems, eac h<br />
modeled according to its Behavior and with<br />
the collection coupled in a manner appropriate<br />
to the behavioral forms used .<br />
Some further elaboration of these term s<br />
seems necessary, but a formal definition (as i n<br />
Klir 1969 and Orchard 1972) is inappropriate .<br />
An attempt to informally define some of th e<br />
38
terms follows. The external quantities (or<br />
variables') are those relevant quantities associated<br />
with the attributes of the object. Part<br />
of them are inputs (produced by the environment)<br />
and part are outputs (produced by th e<br />
object). Specification of these quantitie s<br />
constitutes definition form 1 . By definitio n<br />
form 2, an activity is a particular set of value s<br />
representing the system over a particular se t<br />
of time instants .<br />
The permanent behavior is a time invarian t<br />
relation between the outputs of interest and<br />
other quantities. In order to develop this in<br />
general, it is necessary to augment the specified<br />
external quantities by past values of th e<br />
external quantities (i .e., by a memory), the<br />
augmented set of quantities constituting the<br />
principal quantities . The outputs of interest<br />
are then the dependent quantities (a subset of<br />
the principal quantities), and the relation i s<br />
defined between these and the rest of the<br />
principal quantities .<br />
It is necessary to emphasize that this definition<br />
specifies that the principal quantities ar e<br />
generated from the external quantities alone .<br />
If internal quantities (i .e ., quantities defined<br />
on the subsystems but not on the whole) were<br />
allowed, then the state variable approac h<br />
would be a special case of definition form 3 .<br />
As it is, the two approaches (S-V and Behavior)<br />
have special cases in common .<br />
The State-Transition Structure is defined<br />
by recognition of the State as the instantaneous<br />
value of the external quantities, of the<br />
stimulus as the instantaneous value of th e<br />
input quantities and by a time invariant relation<br />
which sends the system from a particular<br />
state and stimulus at time t into the set of<br />
possible states at time t + h . The S-T structure<br />
is a useful special case of the permanent<br />
behavior, and in subsequent treatment wil l<br />
not be explicitly identified .<br />
One last point regarding behavior . In either<br />
form (of behavior) the time invariant relatio n<br />
can be either deterministic (i .e ., the relation is<br />
a mapping) or probabilistic (i .e., the relatio n<br />
is one to many) and in the latter case eithe r<br />
definition (Behavior or S-T structure) must be<br />
' The quantities are defined on the object . Variables<br />
are model counterparts .<br />
augmented by an appropriate probability<br />
function .<br />
Our notation, then, for the holistic definition<br />
of the system will be :<br />
S={Z,M,Y ;R} (1 )<br />
where Z represents instantaneous input<br />
quantities (variables )<br />
Y represents instantaneous output<br />
quantitie s<br />
M represents memory quantities (past<br />
values of Z or Y quantities )<br />
and R is the appropriate time invariant relation<br />
between Y, on the one hand<br />
and Z and M on the other .<br />
It is the specification of the relation, R ,<br />
which is the goal of ecosystem research at thi s<br />
level. R is the time invariant relation whic h<br />
permits description of the behavior of th e<br />
system (definition form 3) in place of th e<br />
simple "data record" provided by definitio n<br />
form 2 . In fact, it is a fair statement that a<br />
field data collection relates to system definition<br />
by the second form and that it is the rol e<br />
of data analysis and theoretical synthesis t o<br />
progress to forms 3 and 4 .<br />
The behaviorial representation of the system<br />
S as an object, as by (1), is followed by<br />
its perception as a coupled collection of sub -<br />
systems (sub-objects )<br />
S = {So, S I , Sk ; C } (2)<br />
where C is the specification of the coupling s<br />
among the subsystems S i , . .., Sk. Typically ,<br />
the coupling between two subsystems, say S i<br />
and Sj will be the coupling variables defined<br />
by ZjnYj and ZjnYi . That is, some of the<br />
outputs of subsystem Sj become inputs o f<br />
subsystem Si and vice versa, and these coupling<br />
variables define the couplings among th e<br />
subsystems .<br />
In Klir's theory, it seems to be assumed<br />
that all of the external quantities of the system<br />
S appear explicitly as external quantities<br />
of the subsystems (along with many ne w<br />
quantities which are external to Si, i = 1, . . ., k ,<br />
but internal to S) . However, it appears to me<br />
that it is the nature of different levels o f<br />
organization that the external quantities<br />
differ not only in resolution and detail but<br />
possibly also qualitatively and that definition<br />
39
of the external quantities of S would be impossible<br />
in the context of isolated subsystems .<br />
What is needed is some translation of sub -<br />
system external variables into system externa l<br />
variables. Clymer and Bledsoe (1970) have<br />
addressed a similar question in consideratio n<br />
of "interfacing" two subsystems at the sam e<br />
level and use the term "slave model" to designate<br />
the set of equations for changing resolution.<br />
This term seems inappropriate in the<br />
context of composition of subsystem proper -<br />
ties into properties of the whole ; such a<br />
process is more master than slave . I have<br />
chosen the term "Ghost System i2 and notationally<br />
designated So as the integrating sub -<br />
system which derives the properties of th e<br />
whole from the properties of the parts . In its<br />
simplest form, So is a resolution expander of<br />
inputs and reducer of outputs . Whether it will<br />
need to assume a more complex form is yet t o<br />
be seen .<br />
In this manner we have, by statements (1 )<br />
and (2), defined the ecosystem at two organizational<br />
levels, and may elaborate lower level s<br />
by the device of decomposing subsystems i n<br />
the same manner . That is, if S may be defined<br />
at two levels, so may the elements of {Si}, an d<br />
the subsystems so defined, to any desire d<br />
degree of fineness . Ultimately, it is necessary<br />
to end with a behavioral model for all sub -<br />
systems, because it is this model that yield s<br />
explicit form to the relational expressions .<br />
Several points are of interest here . First, i t<br />
is not clear that a hierarchical decompositio n<br />
is always desirable . That is, a finer resolutio n<br />
may not best take the form of a decomposition<br />
of next most coarse form of interest .<br />
Hierarchical forms, however, have man y<br />
advantages and will be used wherever possible .<br />
Second, it is quite clear that a uniform resolution<br />
is unnecessary . That is, a very coarse<br />
resolution model of one subsystem may b e<br />
coupled with a fine resolution model of<br />
another, and such an arrangement will have<br />
many advantages . Not the least of these is th e<br />
advantage of manageability . If we want to<br />
take a closeup view of some parts of the system,<br />
there is no reason to, and many reason s<br />
not to, look at the rest of the system at th e<br />
2 After Koestler's "The Ghost in the Machine ."<br />
same degree of magnification . A hierarchical<br />
subsystem structure will be most conducive t o<br />
a variable resolution, but again, it is no t<br />
necessary .<br />
Application of the<br />
General Theory to the<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystem<br />
With this introduction to the theoretica l<br />
background, we can now take a look at th e<br />
coarser ecosystem structures as we now perceive<br />
them . A diagrammatic convention i s<br />
established which will be recognized as simila r<br />
to Forrester's, but which differs in some<br />
important respects . Let boxes designate compartments<br />
(to be conceptualized as storage<br />
containers), let ovals or circles designate systems<br />
(or subsystems), and let diamonds designate<br />
a set of variables . Solid lines designate<br />
coupled flow variables and dotted lines represent<br />
control variables. As a convention ,<br />
diamonds are eliminated from the flow couplings,<br />
as these variables are apparent fro m<br />
the context, but identification of contro l<br />
variables is important . Occasionally these are<br />
also eliminated from a figure to reduc e<br />
clutter, and in the illustrations given here ,<br />
most control paths are eliminated for th e<br />
same reason .<br />
In figure 1 is depicted a representation of a<br />
system as a whole, with inputs and outputs . At<br />
this level, the entire system (the forest ecosystem)<br />
is defined according to (1) . In figure<br />
2, the same system is elaborated by identification<br />
of major subsystems, the terrestrial biota ,<br />
the aquatic biota and the hydrologic system .<br />
This involves definition of the system according<br />
to (2) and it should be emphasized at thi s<br />
point that there are very many ways in whic h<br />
this could be done .<br />
Implementation of this form (fig. 2) requires<br />
decisions regarding boundaries an d<br />
specifications of the nature of the coupling s<br />
between subsystems . An example will illustrate<br />
both points. Consider the uptake of<br />
water by higher plants . Question : Do we wish<br />
to consider this water as having transferred<br />
40
function, but this appears awkward .<br />
Once all the couplings are identified and<br />
specified, then it is no longer necessary to consider<br />
one subsystem in elaborating the interna l<br />
structure of another. The process of couplin g<br />
specification effectively uncouples the syste m<br />
into subsystems, each of which can be developed<br />
independently, provided that the identified<br />
external variables of the subsystems ar e<br />
maintained .<br />
I will use the word integrity in this context .<br />
Elaboration of the system at one level o f<br />
organization is unrestricted so long as th e<br />
integrity of the next higher level of organization<br />
is maintained. This does not appear at<br />
this writing to be a trivial problem, but th e<br />
problem exists under any formulation o f<br />
model structure and is well identified unde r<br />
the present structure, hence potentially<br />
manageable .<br />
Figure 1 . The system viewed as an object receivin g<br />
inputs from the environment and producin g<br />
outputs .<br />
from the hydrologic system to the terrestrial<br />
biotic system? Or, will we let stored water<br />
remain in the hydrologic system? The answer<br />
to this is arbitrary and should be made on th e<br />
basis of ultimate convenience . If the specification<br />
of couplings is simpler for one boundary<br />
definition than for another, then that boundary<br />
is preferred .<br />
The nature of the couplings (or couplin g<br />
variables) is also important . Suppose we le t<br />
water enter the biotic system at the momen t<br />
of uptake. Then the transfer of water fro m<br />
hydrologic to biotic depends on (1) the stat e<br />
of the hydrologic system (specifically, th e<br />
amount and distribution of water available i n<br />
the soil) and on (2) the biotic demand fo r<br />
water. These two variables must be identifie d<br />
as output variables of the respective system s<br />
in order to elaborate the transfer . It then i s<br />
immaterial whether the calculation of transfer<br />
takes place in the hydrologic or the bioti c<br />
system, but it seems appropriate that it b e<br />
included in the latter as an uptake function .<br />
In fact, one can even leave the function o f<br />
transfer outside both systems as a coupling<br />
Decomposition of the<br />
Terrestrial Biotic System<br />
With this background, I can develop further<br />
details of our present conceptualization .<br />
These results are presented in much greate r<br />
detail in a project document titled "Modeling ,<br />
Round One," prepared jointly by myself an d<br />
a number of others in our program . This<br />
document summarizes a series of seminar -<br />
workshops in which we examined the definition<br />
of subsystems and the nature of thei r<br />
couplings . Reports of details of several sub -<br />
systems are reported by others in this symposium.<br />
I will use several subsystems for illustration<br />
which are not treated elsewhere .<br />
In figure 3 is seen a specification of primary<br />
subsystems of the terrestrial biotic<br />
system. These are not even, in the sense o f<br />
evenness of importance, but rather are chose n<br />
to emphasize the relationships we wish t o<br />
emphasize at this level . Only two compartments<br />
are specifically identified, the plan t<br />
biomass (B. & S.) and the detritus (D .) compartments,<br />
with all others embedded in the<br />
respective systems . Identification of the biomass<br />
compartment forces explicit identification<br />
of a minor subsystem, litterfall. Th e<br />
41
Figure 2 . The major subsystems of a forest ecosystem . Specification of the coupling variables among the majo r<br />
subsystems allows independent development of their internal structure .<br />
42
Figure 3. The December 1971 version of the subsystems of the Terrestrial Biotic System . The external variable s<br />
of the whole system match those illustrated for this subsystem in figure 2 .<br />
traditional decomposition and fixation sub -<br />
system has been uncoupled into the three sub -<br />
systems represented as Decomposition, Fixation<br />
and Weathering, and Interchange and<br />
Uptake (I-U) .<br />
The value of this formulation is several<br />
fold. First, we can recognize that this is a<br />
formal expression of generally held ideas, s o<br />
that only the formality, and perhaps the<br />
identification of the I-U process, is in an y<br />
degree innovative. The formality gives sub -<br />
stance to the concepts, and the formal U-C<br />
structure identifies the tasks facing us as w e<br />
elaborate this structure . These tasks are :<br />
(1) specification of the coupling variables ,<br />
(2) elaboration of internal structure of the<br />
subsystems, and (3) analysis and synthesis o f<br />
behavior and properties of the systems and<br />
4 3<br />
t+
subsystems as objects . In addition, the formal<br />
structure effectively partitions our effort and<br />
ensures that all . bases are covered . Boundaries<br />
between subsystems and the appropriat e<br />
coupling variables must be identified jointl y<br />
by those responsible for the subsystems involved.<br />
After boundaries and coupling variables<br />
are agreed upon, then the activities o f<br />
elaboration of internal structure are independent<br />
among subsystems . This is another<br />
expression of the earlier observation tha t<br />
identification of the couplings effectivel y<br />
uncouples the subsystems .<br />
These values of the model formulation can<br />
be expressed as explication, conceptualization,<br />
and organization . Existing concepts are<br />
given explicit expression, new concepts ar e<br />
developed and research efforts are given structure<br />
and organization, all by the formal ecosystem<br />
model . The fact that the model structure<br />
is arbitrary in no , way obviates thes e<br />
values . On the contrary, the arbitrariness o f<br />
the model structure enhances these values ,<br />
because as we proceed with the process of<br />
elaboration, and bring existing knowledg e<br />
into sharper focus by the process of modeling ,<br />
we are constantly forced into adjustments, re -<br />
orientation, and reorganization .<br />
Structures, like figure 3, are not meant t o<br />
be permanent . They live and die like generations<br />
of insects . In fact, the insect analogy is<br />
quite appropriate for figure 3 . This structure<br />
was conceptualized in the spring and earl y<br />
summer of 1971, during Round One . I t<br />
developed underground, so to speak, all during<br />
the fall, undergoing several transitions, t o<br />
emerge in December in the form presented .<br />
By mid-January 1972 this form had lived ou t<br />
its life and given birth to a new form which is<br />
yet in the larval stages and not ready for th e<br />
light of day .<br />
At the next lower organizational level ,<br />
progress has been made in elaboration of the<br />
internal structure of the food chain subsyste m<br />
and the I-U subsystem . The first is reported<br />
here by Strand and Nagel, but the second i s<br />
not represented in this symposium and I<br />
would like to include a brief description of<br />
that subsystem as additional illustration o f<br />
the way in which we are using the Universe -<br />
Coupling structure .<br />
Figure 4 represents a model form date d<br />
back in 1971, which form has been replace d<br />
by a new but incompletely developed form, in<br />
accordance with the changes being made a t<br />
the next lower resolution (fig . 3). However ,<br />
figure 4 serves to illustrate the concept of th e<br />
I-U process and, again, the point is made tha t<br />
this is developed more fully in the document s<br />
of Round One .<br />
The I-U subsystem is postulated on the following<br />
statements :<br />
1. If nutrients remain in soil solution, they<br />
must be lost to the system by soil and<br />
groundwater transport .<br />
2. Nutrients must be in solution in order t o<br />
be available to uptake .<br />
3. Some microorganisms and some highe r<br />
plants are "leaky ."<br />
4. It is concluded that a successful syste m<br />
must have a tightly coupled, highly interactive<br />
and buffered subsystem of nutrient<br />
interchange and uptake .<br />
The modeling contribution here is th e<br />
recognition (4) that the three stated feature s<br />
of the traditional processes of nutrient inter -<br />
change are such that a successful terrestria l<br />
ecosystem (i .e., one which does not lose it s<br />
nutrients downstream) must have a tightly<br />
coupled I-U subsystem . That is, the traditional<br />
study by individual process canno t<br />
possibly answer the questions we want to ask ,<br />
unless we explicitly define the couplings .<br />
Coupling definition is difficult in a tightl y<br />
coupled system, and appears exceedingl y<br />
difficult in this one . The identified task is th e<br />
conceptualization of properties and behavior<br />
of the I-U subsystem as a whole .<br />
It is my very strong conclusion here that<br />
the Biome research effort should be re -<br />
oriented to accommodate the concept of th e<br />
I-U subsystem. Present conceptualization an d<br />
specification of that subsystem is yet very<br />
primitive and will receive considerable attention<br />
in the next year .<br />
From the model structure point of view ,<br />
the primary productivity subsystem is th e<br />
least well defined in our model . This is, in<br />
part, because most of our research effort ha s<br />
been at lower organizational levels than i s<br />
necessary for ecosystem models . It is a giant<br />
step from tree to community . The primary<br />
44
I<br />
I<br />
I<br />
t<br />
/ INTERCHANG E<br />
a UPTAKE BY SOI L<br />
HIGHER<br />
MICROORGANIS M<br />
PLANT S<br />
I<strong>ON</strong> I C<br />
B<strong>ON</strong>DI NG,<br />
HUMU S<br />
1<br />
SOI L<br />
SOLUTI<strong>ON</strong> ----~--<br />
1<br />
Figure 4 . The December 1971 version of the subsystems of the Interchange and Uptake System. The externa l<br />
variables of the whole system match the couplings of the I-U subsystem of figure 3 .<br />
effort has been at the tree level (and below )<br />
and the model structures for the ecosystem s<br />
are communities. The necessary effort here is<br />
apparent .<br />
Representation of Spatial<br />
and Environmental Variatio n<br />
The Universe Coupling structure is als o<br />
appropriate to the problem of modeling a<br />
heterogenous ecosystem . If the system i s<br />
stratified into homogenous subsystems ,<br />
identified by spatial or environmental criteria ,<br />
then the models appropriate for each of the<br />
strata can be coupled together to form a<br />
model for the whole . This is the approach we<br />
have taken in our watersheds . A watershed is<br />
sufficiently variable, with regard to physical<br />
and biological processes, that we feel it i s<br />
necessary to stratify so as to provide essential<br />
uniformity of processes within strata. Th e<br />
process of composition, of coupling th e<br />
4 5
several models together to form the model for<br />
the watershed as a whole, is the reverse of the<br />
decomposition process previously discussed.<br />
Now we are faced with the question of defining<br />
appropriate external variables of th e<br />
watershed as an object after having initiall y<br />
defined the watershed as a collection of sub -<br />
objects .<br />
These questions are obviously appropriate<br />
to consideration of a general model for, say ,<br />
the entire H . J. <strong>Andrews</strong> <strong>Experimental</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> ,<br />
or for the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome, sob that<br />
we consider them central to our overall<br />
objectives. By concentrating on the proble m<br />
of stratifying a watershed, and on the problems<br />
of modeling the strata and the collective ,<br />
we are attempting to devise strategies which<br />
will be useful in later extension of the modeling<br />
process .<br />
It turns out that if we view the construction<br />
of strata in essentially the same perspective<br />
as the construction of subsystems in th e<br />
U-C structure, the same general criteria hold .<br />
Generally speaking, subsystems (strata )<br />
should be constructed in such a manner tha n<br />
couplings are minimized (or simplified), an d<br />
such that important processes are containe d<br />
within the subsystems . This criterion is no t<br />
always compatible with the second one, tha t<br />
strata should be environmentally homogenous,<br />
within, and occasional conflicts arise .<br />
In any event, we are attempting hierarchica l<br />
stratification of watersheds, with topographic<br />
features defining the primary strata and vegetation<br />
types the secondary, the two levels giving<br />
uncoupling and homogeneity, respectively .<br />
Summary<br />
Some of the ways in which the Universe-<br />
Coupling structure is being used in building a<br />
hierarchical, modular system of models for<br />
the Coniferous Biome have been discussed .<br />
These models are hierarchical by virtue of th e<br />
identification of systems at one level o f<br />
organization as subsystems of the system s<br />
defined at the next higher level. They ar e<br />
modular by virtue of the uncoupled nature ;<br />
identification of the coupling variables at an y<br />
level allows complete flexibility of subsystem<br />
representation, provided that the integrity of<br />
the couplings is maintained .<br />
A general criterion for constructing sub -<br />
systems is provision of simple coupling s<br />
among subsystems with tight relations contained<br />
within . This principle is violated quite<br />
badly when trophic levels are used for sub -<br />
system definition . An alternate structure for<br />
consumers is being investigated in our program,<br />
as reported in the paper by Strand and<br />
Nagel .<br />
In applying the U-C structure to spatial<br />
units, another criterion is employed . Here it i s<br />
desirable to provide homogeneity of environment<br />
and process within strata, with variatio n<br />
among strata of no concern . This criterion i s<br />
sometimes in conflict with the first one o f<br />
minimal couplings, so that compromises are<br />
necessary .<br />
The paper has dealt primarily with aspect s<br />
of structure and criteria for application of th e<br />
structural form . Emphasis has been on th e<br />
first two of the three tasks which the U- C<br />
structure defines, to wit : (1) specification of<br />
the coupling variables, (2) elaboration of<br />
internal structure of subsystems . The third<br />
task, analysis and synthesis of behavior of the<br />
subsystems as objects, is given little attention ,<br />
but this probably is the most important, fro m<br />
the point of view of ecosystem theory . As<br />
mentioned earlier, the conceptualization of<br />
holistic system properties and behavior i s<br />
poorly advanced. The U-C structure provides<br />
an excellent basis for the attempt to develop<br />
this concept .<br />
One last point is made regarding the differences<br />
between the Universe-Couplin g<br />
approach and the State Variable approach .<br />
Since the State Variable model can als o<br />
assume hierarchical form (Goguen 1970), an d<br />
under common explicit models of subsyste m<br />
behavior the U-C model will reduce to a stat e<br />
variable model, one might question the practical<br />
validity of the distinction . Essentially, th e<br />
differences are that one (U-C) is structur e<br />
oriented and the other variable oriented an d<br />
that one (U-C) is oriented simultaneously to<br />
holistic and mechanistic representation an d<br />
the other solely to mechanism . In the application<br />
of ecosystem models so far produced, th e<br />
state variable approach seems adequate ,<br />
46
except for the retention of fine detail . Th e<br />
tendency in constructing models on this base<br />
has been to develop fine resolution mechanistic<br />
models in which the variables defined a t<br />
the finest resolution are in direct relation t o<br />
all the other variables in the system . Variabl e<br />
orientation seems to lead to variable sanctity .<br />
One might make a case for the position that<br />
the state variable approach was developed b y<br />
engineers who have no conceptualizatio n<br />
problem . They know what their variables are ,<br />
and the relations among them, and they ar e<br />
satisfied with mechanistic models .<br />
The U-C structure is seen as a means o f<br />
introducing holism, in addition to mechanism,<br />
into the model conceptualization process . By<br />
focusing on the subsystem structures, and b y<br />
attempting to describe the behavior of the<br />
system and subsystems at all levels in terms of<br />
their behavior as objects, each system an d<br />
subsystem is modeled at two levels, (1) holistically<br />
and (2) mechanistically in terms of th e<br />
holistic behavior of its subsystems . This<br />
approach is held to be much more promising ,<br />
from the point of view of development of<br />
ecosystem theory, than the currently popula r<br />
approach .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The work reported in this paper was supported<br />
in part by National Science Foundatio n<br />
Grant No. GB-20963 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong><br />
Biome, U .S . Analysis of Ecosystems, International<br />
Biological Program. This is Contribution<br />
No . 23 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Clymer, A. B., and L . J. Bledsoe. 1970 . A<br />
guide to the mathematical modeling of a n<br />
ecosystem. In R. G . Wright and G . M. Van<br />
Dyne (eds.), Simulation and analysis of<br />
dynamics of a semi-desert grassland, p .<br />
75-99 . Colo . State Univ . Range Sci . Dep .<br />
Sci. Ser. No . 6 .<br />
Forrester, J . W . 1971 . Counterintuitive behavior<br />
of social systems . Technol. Rev . 73 :<br />
53-69 .<br />
Goguen, J. A . 1970 . Mathematical representation<br />
of hierarchically organized systems . In<br />
E . O . Attinger (ed .), Global systems<br />
dynamics, p . 112-129 . New York : Wiley .<br />
Klir, G. J. 1972 . The polyphonic general<br />
system theory . In G . J . Klir (ed .), Trends in<br />
general systems theory, p . 1-18 . New York :<br />
Wiley-Interscience .<br />
Klir, George J . 1969 . An approach to general<br />
systems theory. 323 p. New York: Van<br />
Nostrand Reinhold Co .<br />
Orchard, R . A .. 1972 . On an approach to general<br />
systems theory . In G. J . Klir (ed .) ,<br />
Trends in general systems theory, p .<br />
205-250. New York : Wiley-Interscience .<br />
Strand, M . A., and W. P. Nagel. 1972 . Preliminary<br />
considerations of the forest canop y<br />
consumer subsystem . In Jerry F. Franklin ,<br />
L. J. Dempster, and Richard H . Warin g<br />
(eds.), Proceedings-research on coniferou s<br />
forest ecosystems-a symposium, p . 71-77 ,<br />
illus. Pac. Northwest <strong>Forest</strong> & Range Exp .<br />
Stn., Portland, Oreg .<br />
47
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium.<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Hydrologic modeling in the<br />
Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome<br />
George W . Brow n<br />
Chairman, Hydrology Subcommittee<br />
Oregon State University<br />
Robert H . Burgy<br />
Hydrology Project Leade r<br />
University of California, Davi s<br />
R . Dennis Har r<br />
Hydrology Project Leade r<br />
Oregon State University<br />
J . Paul Riley<br />
Hydrology Project Leader<br />
Utah State University<br />
Abstract<br />
The objective of the hydrology program is to prepare a model which will provide predictions of the hydrologi c<br />
state of a coniferous watershed at any desired time and in any desired place, where state is defined by the inpu t<br />
needs of the other submodels or systems, particularly the producer and biogeochemical processes. Subsurface flo w<br />
is the dominant runoff mechanism in coniferous watersheds and one of the least understood processes in<br />
hydrology. Research projects in hydrology seek to understand this process using three different techniques . One<br />
project relates subsurface flow to soil properties using direct measurement techniques. Another project approaches<br />
the problem using simulation techniques. The third project utilizes systems analysis and statistical decompositio n<br />
of runoff events to make inferences about subsurface flow. These studies of hydrologic processes will b e<br />
incorporated into a hydrologic model and linked to studies of other systems. The first step in linking our mode l<br />
with those of other groups is watershed stratification, a problem now solved by our modeling efforts.<br />
Introduction<br />
Water is an essential component of any ecosystem.<br />
In the Pacific Northwest, water is a<br />
dominant element. The coniferous forests o f<br />
this region are noted as some of the best -<br />
watered terrestrial ecosystems in the United<br />
States; water is the major linkage which tie s<br />
the terrestrial portion of the coniferous ecosystem<br />
to the aquatic portion .<br />
Water performs several functions which<br />
foster this linkage . Water must be viewed as a<br />
carrier. It carries organic and inorganic nutrients<br />
between the several compartments of the<br />
terrestrial portion of the ecosystem and fro m<br />
the terrestrial to the aquatic portion . Wate r<br />
also carries sediment from the terrestrial t o<br />
the aquatic portion of the system .<br />
Water must also be viewed as a nutrient<br />
itself. It is an essential component of most<br />
biologic processes . The availability of water i n<br />
the soil governs both the initiation and termi -<br />
49
nation of any process as well as the rate a t<br />
which it proceeds .<br />
Objective of the Hydrology Progra m<br />
The objective of our program is to prepare<br />
a model which will provide predictions of th e<br />
hydrologic state of a coniferous watershed at<br />
any desired time and in any desired place ,<br />
where state is defined by the input needs of<br />
the other submodels or systems, particularl y<br />
the producer and biogeochemical processes .<br />
Structure of the Hydrology Modeling Effort<br />
Our modeling effort is organized to pa y<br />
particular attention to the many functions o f<br />
water in the forest ecosystem . A generalized<br />
model for water flow through a forest syste m<br />
was conceptualized long ago . This model is<br />
often called the hydrologic cycle . Rothacher<br />
et al. (1967) showed for the H . J. <strong>Andrews</strong><br />
<strong>Experimental</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> that water movement i n<br />
the forest soil and evapotranspiration are th e<br />
most significant processes governing water<br />
flow .<br />
Our studies focus upon subsurface wate r<br />
movement. One project measures subsurface<br />
flow directly in the study watershed . Another<br />
study is a computer simulation of a water -<br />
shed. This approach will provide yet anothe r<br />
avenue for assessing soil moisture and the sub -<br />
surface flow of water. The simulation model<br />
will be calibrated using 14 years of record o n<br />
watershed 2 . Then the model will be verifie d<br />
with the data available on watershed 10 . A<br />
third project seeks to develop techniques for<br />
predicting the subsurface flow componen t<br />
using a systems analysis technique for statistical<br />
decomposition of the hydrograph into its<br />
components . Other studies will contribut e<br />
submodels to the simulation of the hydrologi c<br />
system. The work of the Primary Producer<br />
group on a transpiration model as well as th e<br />
work of the Meteorology group on an evapotranspiration<br />
model will aid our modeling<br />
effort significantly .<br />
We are concurrently working toward a<br />
more spatially refined model, the character of<br />
which is determined as much by biologic a s<br />
hydrologic constraints . Our latest efforts hav e<br />
focused upon devising a system for stratification<br />
of watershed 10 which is amenable t o<br />
both hydrologic and biologic models .<br />
Other hydrology projects are included i n<br />
the biome effort. We hope to provide hydro -<br />
logic measurements as a part of the work a t<br />
Findley Lake and the evapotranspiratio n<br />
study at the Thompson site . We shall soo n<br />
begin to solicit and organize available dat a<br />
from coniferous watersheds throughout th e<br />
West in anticipation of extrapolating our<br />
model to other ecosystems .<br />
This has provided a broad overall view of<br />
the Coniferous Biome Hydrology Program-its<br />
structure to achieve a better understanding o f<br />
water flow through the ecosystem and its<br />
interaction with other system components . A<br />
more detailed description of the hydrolog y<br />
efforts follows . Each project focuses upon<br />
evaluating water flow in a forested watershed .<br />
Analytical techniques vary between projects ,<br />
but the ultimate goal of modeling subsurfac e<br />
flow mechanisms and watershed respons e<br />
links all projects together .<br />
Subsurface Movement<br />
of Water on<br />
Steep, <strong>Forest</strong>ed Slopes l<br />
With the exception of stream channel interception,<br />
the hydrographs of watersheds in the<br />
forested, steep topography of western Oregon<br />
reflect overall subsurface movement of water .<br />
Watershed response is rapid but without<br />
surface runoff (Barnett 1963, Rothacher et al .<br />
1967) . Although subsurface flow is by far th e<br />
major component of the hydrograph, virtuall y<br />
nothing is known about the process on stee p<br />
slopes. The objective in our study is to characterize<br />
the subsurface movement of water i n<br />
steeply forested topography .<br />
1 Authored by R. Dennis Harr, Assistant Professor,<br />
Oregon State University, Corvallis .<br />
50
The study areas are located at several of th e<br />
lower watersheds in the H . J. <strong>Andrews</strong> <strong>Experimental</strong><br />
<strong>Forest</strong> near Blue River, Oregon . Vegetation<br />
is typical of the low-elevation Douglasfir<br />
forest. Study slopes average about 75 per -<br />
cent. Soil depth is variable with maximu m<br />
depths in excess of 5 meters . Because of high<br />
porosities (70-80 percent) and large proportions<br />
of macropores, these soils drain rapidly .<br />
Permeabilities of 5,000 and 900 mm per hou r<br />
have been noted on nearby watersheds fo r<br />
surface soil and subsoil, respectively (Dyrnes s<br />
1969) .<br />
Methods<br />
Initial investigations are being directe d<br />
toward describing the physical properties of<br />
the porous medium through which wate r<br />
moves on its way to a stream . These field and<br />
laboratory investigations will indicate where<br />
water movement most likely occurs .<br />
Drilling with a portable power drill wil l<br />
follow a grid pattern over a small stream-toridge<br />
portion of slope . At each grid point soi l<br />
depth, depth and thickness of saprolite, an d<br />
depth to unweathered bedrock will be deter -<br />
mined. Additional drilling between initial gri d<br />
points will indicate in more detail the surfac e<br />
contour of the impermeable parent material .<br />
Aluminum tubing placed in each hole wil l<br />
provide access for measurement of ground -<br />
water level or soil moisture content .<br />
In the laboratory, undisturbed soil core s<br />
taken from various depths in soil pits locate d<br />
over the study area are being analyzed . Such<br />
properties as porosity, pore-size distribution ,<br />
stone content, permeability, and moisture retention<br />
characteristics are being evaluated .<br />
The type and amount of measurements to<br />
be made during and following winter stor m<br />
events in 1972-73 will depend on the in -<br />
formation gathered during initial field an d<br />
laboratory investigations now underway .<br />
Anticipated measurements include soil moisture<br />
content, vertical and lateral extent o f<br />
saturated flow, soil moisture tension, precipitation,<br />
and water outflow from the base of<br />
the slope . Drilling and tracer studies will<br />
attempt to define the source area for this<br />
water .<br />
Preliminary Results<br />
Although the study has just recently begun ,<br />
certain observations have provided qualitative<br />
information concerning the subsurface flow<br />
process on steep slopes. Precipitation moves<br />
downward under the influence of gravity until<br />
this movement is obstructed . In some parts of<br />
the study area this obstruction may be cause d<br />
by rock fragments which cause shallow ,<br />
localized saturation as evidenced in several<br />
soil pits during a period of heavy rain . Where<br />
rock fragments are not present, downward<br />
movement of water continues until the relatively<br />
impermeable parent material is reached .<br />
Here saturation occurs, flow acquires a horizontal<br />
component, and water begins movin g<br />
toward the stream.<br />
At some point on the slope this saturated<br />
flow is concentrated into pipelike subsurfac e<br />
channels. The cause of this concentration i s<br />
unknown but could conceivably result fro m<br />
the microrelief of the impermeable material ,<br />
from bedrock fractures, or from decayed root<br />
channels. At the toe of the slope the channels<br />
are spaced about 1-6 meters apart . They lie on<br />
the bedrock surface and appear associated<br />
with surface micro-relief. Shapes of their cross<br />
sections range from circular to flat rectangular.<br />
Width is also variable, ranging from 1<br />
centimeter to about a meter. Where these<br />
channels discharge into the stream channel ,<br />
they are separated by soil which may contai n<br />
a shallow saturated lower layer from whic h<br />
seepage occurs. Water velocity of the seepage<br />
appears to be several orders of magnitud e<br />
lower than that of the subsurface channels .<br />
The latter accounts for the greatest portion o f<br />
stormflow .<br />
The subsurface channels evident at the to e<br />
of the study slopes may be outlets of a sub -<br />
surface drainage system much like that de -<br />
scribed for other humid areas (Jones 1971) .<br />
Water can be observed discharging from suc h<br />
channels in roadcuts and recent soil slumps at<br />
various slope positions in the vicinity of th e<br />
study area. Such a subsurface drainage syste m<br />
could account for the rapid hydrologic<br />
response of these steep slopes .<br />
51
Computer Simulation<br />
of Fores t<br />
Watershed Hydrology 2<br />
A hydrologist is often faced with the need<br />
to predict system responses under variou s<br />
possible management alternatives . One approach<br />
to this problem is to apply the technique<br />
of computer simulation, whereby a<br />
quantitative mathematical model is developed<br />
for investigating and predicting the behavio r<br />
of the system. In this study, a computer<br />
model is being developed to simulate th e<br />
hydrologic responses of a forest watershed ,<br />
emphasizing the measurable variables related<br />
to the plant communities and soil types of th e<br />
watershed . The model represents the inter -<br />
related processes of the system by function s<br />
which describe the different components o f<br />
physical and biological phenomena in a<br />
watershed .<br />
Scope and Objectives of th e<br />
Simulation Stud y<br />
In the first phase of the study, the scope is<br />
being limited to the formulation of a fundamental<br />
model of watershed hydrology whic h<br />
takes precipitation as the basic input and<br />
evapotranspiration and streamflow as output s<br />
of the system . The various component processes<br />
within the system are linked by the conservation<br />
of mass principle. Depending upon<br />
energy levels, water can vary among its solid ,<br />
liquid, and vapor forms ; hence, the energy<br />
budget is used as an auxiliary tool for maintaining<br />
the water balance . That aspect of th e<br />
system involving water as a carrier of nutrients<br />
and sediments will be examined in a<br />
subsequent phase of the study . Under this<br />
next phase a water quality submodel will b e<br />
formulated and added to the quantity mode l<br />
now being developed .<br />
2 Authored by J . Paul Riley, Professor, Utah Wate r<br />
Research Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan ;<br />
George B . Shih, Research Engineer, Utah Water<br />
Research Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan ;<br />
and George E . Hart, Associate Professor . Fores t<br />
Science, Utah State University, Logan, Utah .<br />
The specific objectives of the current phase<br />
of the study are stated as follows :<br />
1. To develop and verify (calibrate an d<br />
test) a hydrologic simulation model for a<br />
small forested subwatershed on the H . J .<br />
<strong>Andrews</strong> <strong>Experimental</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> .<br />
2. To estimate through model sensitivit y<br />
studies the relative importance of variou s<br />
processes within the hydrologic syste m<br />
of the model, with particular emphasi s<br />
on evaluating the soil moisture and inter -<br />
flow components .<br />
Hydrologic System Models<br />
Several hydrologic simulation models ar e<br />
currently available . Examples which might be<br />
cited include Crawford and Linsley (1964) ,<br />
Sittner et al . (1969), and Riley et al.(1966) .<br />
However, in order to meet the needs of thi s<br />
study all existing models require some modifications<br />
and further development . Therefore ,<br />
on the basis of previous work at Utah State<br />
University a computer model is being developed<br />
to simulate the hydrologic behavior of<br />
forest watersheds . The model will be applicable<br />
to a wide variety of geographical area s<br />
and management problems . In this study, data<br />
from watershed 2 on the H . J. Andrew s<br />
<strong>Experimental</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> will be used to demonstrate<br />
the utility of the model . Figure 1 summarizes<br />
the geophysical features of the study<br />
area (Rothacher et al . 1967). Data requirements<br />
include air temperature, precipitation ,<br />
runoff hydrographs, and characteristics of th e<br />
watershed (average slope, degree and aspect ,<br />
vegetative cover, density of vegetative cover ,<br />
soil moisture holding characteristics, an d<br />
drainage density). Other observed records ,<br />
such as snow depth, soil moisture content will<br />
be used to check the performance of th e<br />
model in simulating various component processes<br />
of the system .<br />
Figure 2 illustrates the various componen t<br />
processes represented in this model, with th e<br />
boxes representing storage locations and th e<br />
lines transfer functions . Under this study, th e<br />
hydrology of the drainage area will be synthesized<br />
first as a lumped parameter model in<br />
which the entire watershed area is considere d<br />
as a single space unit. On this basis, a dis -<br />
52
K m<br />
Figure 1 . Watershed 2, H . J. <strong>Andrews</strong> <strong>Experimental</strong> <strong>Forest</strong>, Oregon . Area: 60.3 hectares ; aspect: NW ;<br />
average slope (percent) : 61 .1 ; elevation min .: 526 m; elevation max .: 1,078 m ; main channel length :<br />
1,108 m; drainage density: 4.3 km/km 2 ; precipitation (1952-62) : 2,400 mm/yr; runoff (1953-62) :<br />
1,560 mm/yr; average evapotranspiration (1959-62) : 540 mm/yr .<br />
tributed parameter model will be developed i n<br />
which the watershed will be divided into four<br />
space units, roughly corresponding to subwatersheds<br />
within the area . The model will<br />
compute continuous daily streamflow for<br />
each subarea and route the contribution of<br />
each down the streams to the gaging station ,<br />
where the computed and observed discharges<br />
will be compared. Other important outpu t<br />
functions from the model will include soi l<br />
moisture, actual evapotranspiration, and sno w<br />
depth. Several of the component processe s<br />
which are illustrated by figure 2 are discussed<br />
in the following sections .<br />
Interceptio n<br />
Interception is the part of precipitation<br />
that is caught temporarily by forest canopie s<br />
and then redistributed either to the atmosphere<br />
by evaporation or sublimation or to the<br />
forest floor. The amount of interceptio n<br />
depends upon storm size and intensity, an d<br />
canopy type and density. A report by<br />
Rothacher (1963) showed that throughfall in<br />
the study area was related to storm size b y<br />
the equation :<br />
Throughfall = 0 .8311 x (gross precipitation) - 0 .117 (1 )<br />
In equation 1 throughfall is, of course ,<br />
bounded by the condition that it must be<br />
greater than or equal to zero . Although larger<br />
amounts of snow may be temporarily intercepted<br />
than rain, there is strong evidence that<br />
most intercepted snow ultimately falls and be -<br />
comes part of the snowpack .<br />
53
CLOUD S<br />
I<br />
EVAPORATI<strong>ON</strong><br />
SUBLIMATI<strong>ON</strong><br />
INTERCEPTIO N<br />
0<br />
SNOW SNOW SNO W<br />
z<br />
STORAG E<br />
H<br />
z<br />
0<br />
H<br />
EVAPOTRANSPIRATI<strong>ON</strong><br />
WATER STORED <strong>ON</strong><br />
LAND SURFACE<br />
SNOWMEL T<br />
H<br />
EVAPOTRANSPIRATI<strong>ON</strong><br />
0 .<br />
H<br />
H<br />
w<br />
H<br />
SOIL MOISTURE<br />
OVERLAND FLO W<br />
INTERFLOW<br />
STREAM<br />
CHANNEL<br />
STORAG E<br />
SURFAC E<br />
OUTFLOW<br />
GROUNDWATER<br />
INFLOW<br />
GROUNDWATER<br />
STORAGE<br />
EFFLUENT FLOW -Aim.<br />
INFLUENT FLOW E-<br />
GROUNDWATER OUTFLO W<br />
Figure 2 . A flow diagram of the hydrologic system within a typical watershed area.<br />
54
An alternative way of considering interception<br />
quantities in a model is to express<br />
interception rate as a decaying function of<br />
time limited by an average interception storage<br />
capacity for the watershed canopy . This<br />
approach was incorporated into a watershed<br />
simulation model by Riley et al . (1966) .<br />
Forms of Precipitation<br />
Snow Storage and Melt<br />
Only two forms of precipitation, rain an d<br />
snow, are considered in this study, with a<br />
surface air temperature criterion being applie d<br />
to establish the occurrence of these two<br />
forms. Figure 3 (U .S. Army Corps of Engineers<br />
1956) shows that at a temperature of<br />
1.5°C there is a 50-percent chance that th e<br />
precipitation will be in the form of snow . A<br />
straight-line fit to figure 3 is used to deter -<br />
mine the portion of rain in a given day ac -<br />
cording to the following equation .<br />
Ta - Ts<br />
R=P<br />
(2 )<br />
T r- Ts<br />
in which<br />
R = estimated portion of total dail y<br />
precipitation occurring as rai n<br />
P = total daily precipitation<br />
Ta<br />
T s<br />
Tr<br />
= mean daily surface air temperatur e<br />
= mean daily air temperature below<br />
which all precipitation is assumed<br />
to occur as snow<br />
= mean daily air temperature above<br />
which all precipitation is assumed<br />
to occur as rain<br />
Precipitation falling as snow will be accumulated<br />
on the watershed until air temperatures<br />
rise sufficiently above the freezing poin t<br />
to initiate snowmelt .<br />
10 0<br />
1 0<br />
9 0<br />
2 0<br />
8 0<br />
3 0<br />
7 0<br />
4 0<br />
5 0<br />
6 0<br />
7 0<br />
8 0<br />
9 0<br />
100<br />
-1 .5 -1 .0 -0 .5Ts 0 0 .5 1 .0 2 .0 3 .0 4 .0 Tr<br />
SURFACE AIR TEM<strong>PE</strong>RATURE, ° C<br />
Figure 3 . Frequency distribution of precipitation in rain and snow forms .<br />
0<br />
55
LIQUID WATER-HOLDIN G<br />
CAPACITY OF SNOWPAC K<br />
Figure 4 . A flow chart of the snow accumulation and ablation processes.<br />
56
Snowmelt<br />
A flow chart of the snow accumulation an d<br />
ablation processes is shown by figure 4 . Rate<br />
of snowmelt depends primarily upon the rate<br />
of energy input to the snowpack . However,<br />
both the complex nature of snowmelt an d<br />
data limitations prevent a strictly analytica l<br />
approach to the simulation of this process ,<br />
and air temperatures are frequently applied a s<br />
an index of available energy . Examples of<br />
researchers who have used this approach ar e<br />
Pysklywec et al. (1968), Anderson and Craw -<br />
ford (1964), Amorocho and Espildor a<br />
(1966), and Eggleston et al. (1971). Becaus e<br />
temperature data are the only indicators o f<br />
energy levels available on watershed 2, a<br />
degree-day approach based upon the work o f<br />
Eggleston et al. (1971) will be used in th e<br />
model of this study to represent the snowmelt<br />
process at the surface of the snowpack . This<br />
component submodel includes mathematical<br />
relationships for various phenomena involve d<br />
in the snowmelt process . The submodel is<br />
applicable to any geographic location by determining<br />
appropriate constants for certain re -<br />
lationships through a verification procedure .<br />
The relationship for surface melt rate i s<br />
expressed as follows :<br />
RIs<br />
Prg<br />
Mrs =kmkvRIh Ta( 1-A ) +Ta 80 (3)<br />
in whic h<br />
km = a constant of proportionality<br />
kv<br />
RI h<br />
RI s<br />
= vegetation transmission coefficient<br />
for radiatio n<br />
radiation index for a horizontal surface<br />
at the same latitude as th e<br />
particular watershed or zone under<br />
study<br />
radiation index for a particula r<br />
watershed zone possessing a known<br />
degree and aspect of slop e<br />
T a = surface air temperature in °C<br />
A = albedo, or reflectivity, of the snowpack<br />
surfac e<br />
Prg<br />
precipitation reaching the snow surface<br />
in the form of rain, in<br />
centimeters<br />
Infiltration<br />
Rates of water supply on the ground surface,<br />
whether in the form of rainfall minus<br />
interception or snowmelt, must exceed infiltration<br />
rates before any surface runoff occurs .<br />
The infiltration rate depends on the physical<br />
and moisture characteristics of the soil, as<br />
well as the surface organic conditions, and it<br />
is often expressed in the form of Horton's<br />
exponential equation . However, the soils of<br />
watershed 2 are very porous and no overlan d<br />
flow has been observed . Thus, all precipitation<br />
reaching the ground surface is assumed to<br />
infiltrate into the soil and to move to th e<br />
stream channels as subsurface flow .<br />
Soil Moisture<br />
Soils on the study watershed are relatively<br />
deep and have a high porosity . Data on the<br />
physical properties of the watershed soils ar e<br />
available (Rothacher et al . 1967), and this<br />
information will be used to determine the soi l<br />
moisture holding characteristics .<br />
The computer model allows infiltrating<br />
water to satisfy first the available moistur e<br />
holding capacity of the soil within the roo t<br />
zone of the forest canopy . When the available<br />
soil moisture holding capacity is reached ,<br />
additional infiltration is assumed to percolate<br />
by gravitation either somewhat laterally with -<br />
in the root zone or downward to deeper soi l<br />
zones. Water which moves laterally usuall y<br />
reaches a surface channel within a relativel y<br />
short period of time, whereas deep percolation<br />
moves from the watershed more slowl y<br />
and sustains streamflow during dry seasons .<br />
From preliminary studies (Rothacher et al .<br />
1967), approximately 87 percent of the tota l<br />
annual precipitation reaches the ground surface,<br />
and about 75 percent of this quantity<br />
becomes surface runoff . From an analysis of<br />
streamflow hydrographs it is estimated tha t<br />
about 10 percent of the runoff comes fro m<br />
baseflow, which is contributed from dee p<br />
percolation . Thus, of the average annual<br />
precipitation of 2,400 mm which falls on th e<br />
watershed approximately 2,100 mm enter th e<br />
soil, 440 mm are abstracted by evapotranspiration,<br />
and the remaining 1,660 mm leav e<br />
57
the watershed as surface runoff, with 170 m m<br />
of this quantity occurring as baseflow . Th e<br />
soil moisture content computed by the mode l<br />
will be checked with observed data .<br />
Evapotranspiratio n<br />
Factors affecting evapotranspiration includ e<br />
temperature, solar radiation, wind, humidity ,<br />
and consumptive use by plants . However ,<br />
only temperature and humidity data are<br />
available for the watershed . Among the commonly<br />
used evapotranspiration equations<br />
(Veihmeyer 1964), the Penman equation i s<br />
perhaps the most rational, but the data requirements<br />
are extensive . For this reason, the<br />
modified Hargreaves (Veihmeyer 1964), will<br />
be used in this study . The equation is stated<br />
as follows .<br />
U =E Kd(0 .38-0.0038h)T a (4)<br />
in which<br />
U = the daily potential evapotranspiration<br />
in centimeters<br />
d = the daily daytime coefficient de -<br />
pendent upon latitud e<br />
h = the mean daily relative humidity at<br />
noon<br />
Ta = the mean daily surface air temperature<br />
in ° c<br />
K = a monthly consumptive use coefficient<br />
which is dependent upo n<br />
plant related characteristics, such a s<br />
species, growth stage, and densit y<br />
on the watershe d<br />
The influence of soil water on evapotranspiration<br />
has been the subject of much re -<br />
search and discussion . It is now generall y<br />
recognized that there is some reduction i n<br />
evapotranspiration rate as the quantity o f<br />
water within the root zone decreases . In this<br />
study it will be assumed that evapotranspiration<br />
occurs at the potential rate through a<br />
certain range of the available soil moisture . A<br />
critical moisture level is then reached at whic h<br />
actual transpiration begins to lag behind th e<br />
potential rate . Within this range of the avail -<br />
able soil moisture the relationship betwee n<br />
available water content and transpiration rat e<br />
will be assumed to be virtually linear . Thus,<br />
E = U, [Mes < Ms(t) < M cs] (5 )<br />
in which<br />
E = daily evapotranspiration adjuste d<br />
for the influence of soil moistur e<br />
levels<br />
M s quantity of water stored within th e<br />
root zone and available for plan t<br />
use at any time, t<br />
Mes limiting root zone available moisture<br />
content below which soil moisture<br />
tensions reduce evapotranspira -<br />
tion rates<br />
M cs root zone storage capacity of water<br />
available to plants<br />
M s (t)<br />
E = U [Mes > M s (t) >_ O] ( 6 )<br />
Mes<br />
Considering the pressure effect, the total rate<br />
of gravity water storage depletion through<br />
both interflow and deep percolation is<br />
assumed to be directly proportional to th e<br />
quantity of water in this form of storage remaining<br />
in the soil profile at any particula r<br />
time. The interflow portion of this depletion ,<br />
Nr, will be expressed as follows :<br />
Nr ( t) = Ki<br />
ddGs = Ki (Kg Gs (t) )<br />
in which<br />
K i = interflow depletion coefficien t<br />
Kg = gravity water depletion coefficien t<br />
-K t<br />
That is, Nr = KiKgGs(0)e g , in which gravity<br />
storage at time, t = 0 is represented b y<br />
Gs(0) and no input to Gs is assumed to occur<br />
between t = 0 and any other time, t . It is estimated<br />
that on watershed 2 about 90 percen t<br />
of the gravity water storage leaves the area as<br />
interflow, in which case KiKg = 0 .9 .<br />
Groundwater<br />
(7 )<br />
Water enters groundwater storage as dee p<br />
percolation from the overlying plant root<br />
zone. The rate of deep percolation, Gr, is<br />
numerically equal to the total rate of gravity<br />
water depletion within the root zone less th e<br />
interflow rate . Thus,<br />
58
d Gs<br />
Gr = (1 - Ki) d t<br />
By integrating equation 9 over a specific tim e<br />
period the accumulated inflow to the ground -<br />
water basin, Gam,, is estimated for this tim e<br />
period .<br />
Gw = f<br />
o<br />
G<br />
(1 - Ki) d dt (10)<br />
dt<br />
If the groundwater basin is considered as a<br />
linear reservoir, the outflow rate is given by<br />
the expression<br />
Qrg = K b Gw ( 11 )<br />
in whic h<br />
K b = a coefficient which is estimated<br />
from dry season streamflow hydrograph<br />
s<br />
Qrg = the outflow rate from the groundwater<br />
reservoir<br />
By combining equations 9 and 11, the net<br />
rate of storage change within the groundwater<br />
basin is derived a s<br />
Gr - Qrg d t<br />
By substituting equation 11 into equation 1 2<br />
and rearranging terms, the following relation -<br />
ship is obtained .<br />
d dtg = Kb Mr (t) - Qrg (t)l (13)<br />
The rate of discharge from the groundwate r<br />
basin as baseflow is obtained by solving equation<br />
13 for Qrg.<br />
Runoff<br />
d G am,<br />
(9)<br />
(12)<br />
The possible sources of streamflow at any<br />
reach within a channel are overland flow (surface<br />
runoff), interflow, groundwater, and up -<br />
stream input. Manning's equation is usuall y<br />
applied to compute overland and channel flow<br />
rates at any point . Under conditions on watershed<br />
2, however, surface runoff does not occur ,<br />
and channel routing on a daily time increment<br />
is not significant . Therefore, runoff rates at th e<br />
stream gage are given by summing the interflow<br />
and groundwater discharge rates .<br />
Model Verification<br />
Model verification includes calibration of<br />
the model parameters to a particular area ,<br />
testing the sufficiency of processes defined i n<br />
the model, and examining the prediction performance<br />
of the model . A self-calibration subroutine<br />
will be included in the model whereb y<br />
the program will search for optimal model<br />
parameter values . Under this procedure each<br />
water year is used as a unit for optimizatio n<br />
and the objective function is to minimize th e<br />
variance between observed and compute d<br />
streamflow (Shih 1971). The sufficiency of<br />
processes defined in the model is reflected in<br />
the dispersion of parameter values resultin g<br />
from each year of calibration . After th e<br />
model is calibrated, those years of data whic h<br />
were not used ' for calibration are used to<br />
examine the confidence level of prediction s<br />
by the model . A flow diagram of the mode l<br />
verification procedure is shown by figure 5 .<br />
Model Parameters<br />
Model parameters are the coefficients use d<br />
in defining the processes which have not bee n<br />
accurately measured or which cannot b e<br />
directly measured. By establishing the value s<br />
of these coefficients the general model i s<br />
fitted to the hydrologic system of a specifi c<br />
watershed . Depending upon the resolution of<br />
the model and the availability of data, the<br />
number of parameters to be calibrated may<br />
vary. In order to avoid using a large numbe r<br />
of degrees of freedom in the calibration<br />
process and to save computation time, the<br />
number of model parameters should be kept<br />
as few as possible. In this study, the preliminary<br />
model parameters to be calibrated are<br />
interception storage capacity (SI), snowmelt<br />
coefficient (Ks), soil moisture retentio n<br />
capacity (Mcs), gravity water depletion coefficient<br />
(Kg), and groundwater recession coefficient<br />
(Kb) .<br />
59
(AVAILABLE DAT A<br />
WATER YEA R<br />
HYDROLOGI C<br />
DATA<br />
CALCULATE WATERSHED COEFFICIENT S<br />
ESTIMATE THE INITIAL VALUE AN D<br />
LIMIT OF MODEL PARAMETERS SE T<br />
UP PARAMETER VALUE C<strong>ON</strong>STRAINT S<br />
ENTIRE WATERSHED AS SINGLE UNIT<br />
WATERSHED HYDROLOGI C<br />
SIMULATI<strong>ON</strong> MODE L<br />
1<br />
CALIBRATE THE<br />
MODEL PARAMETERS<br />
CHECK ACCURACY AN D<br />
PARAMETER VALUE DIS<strong>PE</strong>RSI<strong>ON</strong><br />
IMPROV E<br />
MODE L<br />
DAILY TIME INCREMENT<br />
C<strong>ON</strong>VERT MODEL COEFFICIENTS<br />
AND PARAMETERS FOR DAIL Y<br />
TIME INCREMEN T<br />
CALCULATE AND ESTIMAT E<br />
SUBWATERSHED COEFFICIENT S<br />
AND PARAMETERS<br />
CALIBRATI<strong>ON</strong>, RESULTS STUD Y<br />
AND COMPARIS<strong>ON</strong> WITH<br />
M<strong>ON</strong>THLY MODE L<br />
NO Ị<br />
IMPROV E<br />
DEFINITI<strong>ON</strong><br />
OF PROCESSE S<br />
SUBWATERSHE D<br />
MODEL<br />
NO<br />
SENSITIVIT Y<br />
ANALYSIS<br />
APPLICATI<strong>ON</strong><br />
Figure 5 . Flow diagram for verification procedure .<br />
I<br />
6 0
Calibration of Parameter s<br />
In general, it is anticipated that realisti c<br />
parameter values are established through th e<br />
calibration procedure . However, when streamflow<br />
is the only available component for<br />
checking the model, it is possible that several<br />
combinations of parameter values will yiel d<br />
satisfactory agreement between observed an d<br />
computed outflow hydrographs . The proble m<br />
of establishing unique parameter values i s<br />
approached on the basis of hydrologic judgment<br />
and by using "interior" observations ,<br />
such as snow depth and soil moisture, a s<br />
check points on model performance . Other<br />
ways of testing the model include the tim e<br />
distribution of output quantities, such a s<br />
stream flow, and known (or estimated )<br />
monthly or annual quantities . For example ,<br />
for watershed 2 it is estimated that interception<br />
storage is about 0 .5 cm, and total interception<br />
amounts to approximately 17 percen t<br />
of the annual precipitation .<br />
Under the self-calibration technique model<br />
parameter values are altered or purturbed in a<br />
random sequence and the resulting changes in<br />
the objective function are examined (Shi h<br />
1971). A computer flow chart for the calibration<br />
subroutine is shown by figure 6 . The<br />
entire program model, including the calibration<br />
subroutine, will be synthesized on a<br />
hybrid computer.<br />
Sensitivity and Management Studies<br />
Sensitivity<br />
A sensitivity analysis is performed b y<br />
changing one system variable while holdin g<br />
the remaining variables constant and notin g<br />
the changes in the model output functions . If<br />
small changes in a particular system parameter<br />
induce large changes in the output or respons e<br />
function, the system is said to be sensitive t o<br />
that parameter . Thus, through sensitivity<br />
analyses it is possible to establish the relative<br />
importance with respect to system respons e<br />
of various system processes and input functions.<br />
This kind of information is useful fro m<br />
the standpoint of system management, syste m<br />
modeling, and the assignment of priorities i n<br />
the collection of field data. Under this study,<br />
the verified model will be used to perfor m<br />
various sensitivity analyses for the hydrologi c<br />
system of watershed 2 .<br />
Management<br />
Opportunities for management of a fores t<br />
watershed are widely varied, and range fro m<br />
changes in logging practices to forms of soil<br />
treatment. Actual implementation of a<br />
management scheme depends upon benefit s<br />
gained as compared with possible disbenefits .<br />
The simulation model developed under thi s<br />
study will not make direct comparisons of<br />
benefits and disadvantages, but will predict<br />
changes in the system output associated wit h<br />
given management alternatives . Under this<br />
study the capability of the model will be<br />
demonstrated for rapidly testing many<br />
possible management alternatives .<br />
Much of the work discussed by this paper i s<br />
based upon past developments in watershed<br />
simulation at Utah State University . Hydro -<br />
logic modeling of the H . J. <strong>Andrews</strong> <strong>Experimental</strong><br />
<strong>Forest</strong> for Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biom e<br />
has just begun, and the preceding discussio n<br />
has been influenced by a consideration o f<br />
particular conditions in the study area . How -<br />
ever, the model will be fundamental in<br />
concept, and therefore generally applicable in<br />
a geographic sense . Whenever feasible, th e<br />
model will use basic equations which are valid<br />
for short time intervals to define the variou s<br />
processes in the model . The output will the n<br />
be summed for application to daily or longe r<br />
time increments . For example, Horton 's infiltration<br />
equation is applicable in minute units ,<br />
but by summing these quantities, the model i s<br />
capable of calculating equivalent daily infiltration<br />
rates . For the area under this study, how -<br />
ever, it is assumed that water supply rates a t<br />
the ground surface do not exceed infiltratio n<br />
capacities, so that surface runoff does not<br />
occur, thus considerably simplifying th e<br />
model calibration process .<br />
System functions which are important t o<br />
forest management and other aspects of th e<br />
total project include evapotranspiration and<br />
soil moisture . These functions, along wit h<br />
streamflow, will be estimated by the mode l<br />
for use in other parts of the total system<br />
61
SET UP PARAMETER OPTIMIZIN G<br />
ORDER IN RANDOM SEQUENC E<br />
CHANGE THE <strong>PE</strong>RTURBATI<strong>ON</strong> DIRECTI<strong>ON</strong><br />
WITHIN GIVEN PARAMETER LIMI T<br />
ASSIGN OPPOSITE DIRECTIO N<br />
OF <strong>PE</strong>RTURBATI<strong>ON</strong> I N<br />
NEXT CYCLE<br />
PARAMETERS TESTE D<br />
WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT<br />
IMPROVEMENT<br />
L = L + 1<br />
RESULT S<br />
FROM THIS S E<br />
OF PARAMETER VALU E<br />
SATISFY TH E<br />
C<strong>ON</strong>STRAINTS<br />
i RETURN<br />
Figure 6 . Flow chart for the model calibration .<br />
I<br />
E2
model being developed under the Coniferou s<br />
Biome Program. The important underlying<br />
feature throughout the entire study will b e<br />
that all of the separately described hydrologi c<br />
processes and phenomena are interlinked into<br />
a total system . Thus, from the model, hope -<br />
fully, it will be possible to evaluate the relative<br />
importance of the various items, explore<br />
critical areas where data and perhaps theor y<br />
are lacking, and finally establish guidelines fo r<br />
the improved management of forest water -<br />
sheds .<br />
INPU T<br />
(lOVO<br />
(A)<br />
SYSTEM<br />
(KNOWN )<br />
SYSTEM SYNTHESI S<br />
OUTPUT<br />
^-TI €N NNowN 1<br />
Hydrologic Systems Analysis 3<br />
INPUT<br />
(KNOWN)<br />
SYSTE M<br />
(UNKNOWN)<br />
OUTPU<br />
T (KNOWN )<br />
The purpose of this research is to devise a<br />
technique for statistical decomposition of a<br />
hydrologic event such that system processe s<br />
such as precipitation, subsurface flow, an d<br />
evapotranspiration, which contribute to th e<br />
observed streamflow can be separated and<br />
described. This technique will therefore pro -<br />
vide one more avenue for determination of<br />
the subsurface flow process on forest soils .<br />
The technique chosen for this research is a<br />
form of systems analysis .<br />
Systems, Definitions and Basic Principles<br />
System may be defined as an aggregate of<br />
physical parts that do not change with time ,<br />
operating on an input to produce an output ,<br />
both being functions of time . The simplified<br />
representation of a watershed, given in figure<br />
2, can be considered as a system whose input<br />
is precipitation and runoff its output . Syste m<br />
"synthesis" is a technique employed when th e<br />
system is known in terms of a mathematical<br />
equation; the objective is to determine th e<br />
nature of the output for any class of inpu t<br />
(fig. 7) . In system "analysis" a syste m<br />
response function or kernel which best de -<br />
scribes a given input-output pair is derived<br />
(fig. 7) . The term "best" implies that the<br />
derived kernels are not unique . Combination s<br />
of both techniques can be used for the solution<br />
of hydrologic problems . A system can<br />
3 Authored by Z. G. Papazafiriou, Research<br />
Associate, and R . H . Burgy, Professor, University o f<br />
California, Davis .<br />
(C)<br />
(B)<br />
SYSTEM ANALYSI S<br />
MULTI-INPUT/OUTPUT SYSTEM<br />
Figure 7 . Illustration of systems .<br />
have one input and one output or many in -<br />
puts and outputs (fig. 7). A system i s<br />
"lumped parameter" if input and output ar e<br />
functions of a single variable . Otherwise, th e<br />
system is of the "distributed parameter" type .<br />
If the system response at any time, due to a<br />
given input, is uniquely determined, th e<br />
system is said to be "deterministic." If the<br />
system response is subject to uncertain influences,<br />
the system is "stochastic o r<br />
probabilistic . "<br />
A quantity z is a "functional" for the function<br />
x(t) in the interval (a,b), if it depend s<br />
upon all values taken by x(t), when t varies i n<br />
the interval (a,b) . An illustration of a functional<br />
is given in figure 8 . The output of a<br />
system is a functional of the input and, fo r<br />
the same reason, runoff is a functional o f<br />
precipitation. A system is "time invariant " if<br />
it does not change with time. Such system s<br />
can be represented by functionals . "Physically<br />
realizable" is a system whose output at time t<br />
depends only upon past values of the input .<br />
63
can be almost linear, but there is no linea r<br />
system which can be almost nonlinear . In<br />
general, linearity is a limiting case of non -<br />
linearity. Therefore, any theory or technique<br />
adequate for a general nonlinear system i s<br />
equally adequate for linear systems .<br />
Deterministic Linear Hydrologic Systems<br />
The theory behind most linear methods ca n<br />
be generalized in the following manner . Suppose<br />
that s and a are continuous variable s<br />
representing position in space, and t and r<br />
define position in time . Consider the linear<br />
P. D. E . of the general form<br />
L[g(s,t)] = f(s,t) (17)<br />
Figure 8 . Demonstration of a functional .<br />
Hydrologic systems are physically realizabl e<br />
where L is linear P . D. operator of arbitrary<br />
since their outputs (runoff) at time t depen d<br />
order, and g(s,t) some function which satisfie s<br />
only on the past values of their inputs (precipitation)<br />
. The "memory" of a system is th e<br />
equation 17 within a certain region R . Given<br />
the appropriate homogeneous boundary conditions<br />
along R, the solution of equation 1 7<br />
time period between some past time and th e<br />
present for which the output depends only<br />
can be written according to Hildebran d<br />
upon the input . If the output depends only<br />
(1958) as<br />
on the present value of the input, the syste m<br />
is said to be a "no-memory" system . If the<br />
g(s,t) =f f G(s,t ; a,r) f (a,r) da dr (18)<br />
output of a time invariant system is analyti c<br />
R<br />
about zero input at some time to, the syste m If<br />
is "analytic". Analyticity is very important ,<br />
f(s,t) = fs (s) ft (t) (19)<br />
since if a system is analytic, its output can b e<br />
equation 18 can be written in the for m<br />
expanded in Volterra series . Hydrologic<br />
systems are assumed to be analytic.<br />
g(s,t) =f f(r) [f G(s,t ; a,r) do] dr (20)<br />
A deterministic system H is said to be<br />
s<br />
"linear," if given the inputs X 1 (t) and X 2 (t)<br />
such that<br />
If fs (s) is spatially invariant, we may write<br />
y 1 (t) = H [AX 1(t)] (1 4)<br />
f<br />
ti ti<br />
g(s,t) = G (s,t ; r) f (r) dr (21)<br />
y 2 (t) = H [BX 2 (t)] (15)<br />
implies that<br />
Y1 (t) + Y2 (t) = Y[ X (t)] ( 16)<br />
= H [AX 1 (t) + BX 2 (t) ]<br />
= AH [X 1 (t)] + BH [X 2 (t)]<br />
that is, in a linear system, each member of a<br />
sequence of input values influences the out -<br />
put independently of every other . This is the<br />
well known principle of superposition. If a<br />
system does not satisfy the above condition i t<br />
is said to be "nonlinear . " A nonlinear system<br />
where<br />
ti ti<br />
f (r) = f(s,t), and G(s,t ; r) (22)<br />
= fG(s,t ; a,r) da<br />
s<br />
We can write equation 21 in differentia l<br />
equation form as<br />
d<br />
An(s,t)<br />
dtn't) + An 1(s,t) dn-lg(s,t) +<br />
dt n- 1<br />
+ A 0(s,t) g(s,t) = f(s,t) (23)<br />
64
Usually, we are interested in the output variable<br />
at some particular point in space ( a<br />
particular gaging station), in which case equation<br />
23 becomes<br />
An(t) dng(t)<br />
+ An-1(t)<br />
do-1g(t)<br />
+<br />
dtn dt n-1<br />
▪ + A0(t) g(t) = f(t)<br />
(24)<br />
which describes a spatially lumped parameter ,<br />
time-varying linear system. If we assume that<br />
the parameters in equation 24 are time in -<br />
variant, we obtai n<br />
An ddgnt) + An-1 do-lg(t) +<br />
▪<br />
Aog(t) = f(t)<br />
dtn- 1<br />
(25)<br />
which describes a time invariant, lumpe d<br />
parameter linear system . If we assume that<br />
the system is completely at rest at t=0, we can<br />
write equation 25 in the form of the con -<br />
volution equation<br />
t<br />
g(t) = f h(r) f(t-r) dr (26 )<br />
0<br />
which is the basis of the unit hydrograp h<br />
theory and many other hydrologic techniques.<br />
In equation 26, g(t) represents runoff,<br />
f(t) rainfall, and h(t) is the kernel, or in thi s<br />
case, the unit hydrograph .<br />
In summary, application of equation 26<br />
implies that the watershed behaves as a linear<br />
system, it is time invariant, the rainfall is<br />
uniformly distributed over the watershed<br />
area, and the watershed is completely at res t<br />
at the beginning of the rain . The "effective"<br />
precipitation is used as an input to th e<br />
system. This implies that we know some<br />
method for the separation of the runof f<br />
hydrograph into base flow and direct runoff<br />
(fig. 9) . This approach in fact is a combination,<br />
using system synthesis for the estimation<br />
of the effective precipitation, and syste m<br />
analysis for the estimation of runoff. Methods<br />
using this technique have been developed b y<br />
Snyder (1955), Eagleson et al. (1966), Nash<br />
(1957, 1960), O'Donnell (1960), Dooge<br />
(1965), and others .<br />
Deterministic Nonlinear Hydrologic System s<br />
As it was noted in a previous section, a<br />
time invariant analytic system can be expanded<br />
in Volterra series . Such an expansion<br />
can be written in the form<br />
y(t)=ho+ f h 1( T1) x ( t-r1) dr 1<br />
+ f f h 2 (T1 ,T2) X (t-T1) X(t-T 2 )dr 1 dr 2<br />
+f f hn(T 1 Tn) x(t-T 1 ) ...<br />
x(t-Tn) dr 1<br />
. . . drn<br />
+ (27)<br />
EFFECTIVE RAINFALL = DIRECT RUNOF F<br />
xUI<br />
Y(T)<br />
BASE FLOW<br />
m.'UtAut%A%atU<br />
Figure 9 . Estimation of effective rainfall through hydrograph separation .<br />
65
where hi are the kernels of the system an d<br />
ho=0 unless a source or sink is present. If th e<br />
system is physically realizable, and has finite<br />
memory (as it happens with hydrologi c<br />
systems), equation 27 can be written in th e<br />
form u<br />
r y ( t) = J h 1 (r 1 ) x(t-r1) dr 1<br />
U<br />
0<br />
u<br />
+ f ,/ 3 r h 2 ( T 1 ,T2) X4-T 1 ) X(t-T2 )dr1 dr2<br />
0 0<br />
+ . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />
+<br />
u<br />
f . . .<br />
u<br />
f hn (T 1 . . .Tn)x(t-T1) . . .<br />
0 0<br />
x(t-T n )dT i<br />
. . . dTn<br />
subject to the condition<br />
h i(t) = 0 for all r < 0<br />
(28)<br />
and where u is the length of the memory . If ,<br />
instead of continuous functions, discrete set s<br />
of data are used, equation 28 can be written<br />
in the form<br />
U<br />
y(T) = H 1(S1) X(T-S 1 )<br />
S 1 = 0<br />
U U<br />
+ E E H 2 (S1,S2) X(T-S1 )<br />
S 1 =0 S 2 =0 X(T-S 2 )<br />
U U<br />
+ E . . . E H n(S I . .. S n ) X(T-S 1 )<br />
Si =0 Sn = O X(T-S n ) (29)<br />
The first term in equation 28 or 29 represents<br />
a linear system, that is an ordinary con -<br />
volution integral. The other terms are a<br />
generalization of the convolution integral . In<br />
general, the i th term represents a pure subsystem<br />
of order i. Therefore our system y(t) i s<br />
composed of the summation of a linear and a<br />
series of nonlinear subsystems . If we represent<br />
the successive terms of the system by H i (t) ,<br />
H 2 (t), . . ., Hn(t), . . ., respectively, the system<br />
can be written in the for m<br />
y(t) = H1(t) + H 2 (t) + . . .. + Hn(t) + . . . . (30)<br />
An illustration of a nonlinear system is give n<br />
in figure 10 .<br />
A system is identified whenever its kernel s<br />
hn(t) are calculated. This evaluation is base d<br />
on the past behavior of the system. Theoretically,<br />
after knowing all the kernels, th e<br />
response of the system can be calculated fo r<br />
any given set of input values .<br />
Equation 28 (in the form given) is very<br />
generalized and its usage is limited and tim e<br />
consuming . It is desirable to reduce the operations<br />
involved . For example, given a sequence<br />
of inputs, sometimes sequential values ar e<br />
highly correlated, and the system itself may<br />
smooth out rapid fluctuations . Hydrologic<br />
systems demonstrate both of these characteristics<br />
. Thus, we may look for ways whic h<br />
can describe the sequence by a smalle r<br />
number of parameters . If the sequence x 1 . . . .<br />
Xi . . . . Xn represents observations at times<br />
t1 . . ..tj . . . .tn, respectively, they can be approximated<br />
by a polynomial of the for m<br />
k<br />
X k(t) = aa +alt+ . ..+aktk= a m tm (31)<br />
m= 0<br />
where k
LINEAR<br />
Y~(T)<br />
2nd ORDER<br />
Y2 (T)<br />
3rd ORDER<br />
Y 3 (T)<br />
INPUT<br />
X (T)<br />
OUTPUT<br />
Y (T )<br />
}<br />
nth ORDER<br />
Yi (T )<br />
Figure 10 . Illustration of nonlinear system representation by Volterra Series.<br />
the memory, an exact match could be made<br />
to each of the input values . However, n o<br />
economy in the description would have bee n<br />
affected . Instead, fewer polynomials can b e<br />
used. This introduces an error, but due to th e<br />
nature of the operation, it will be the leas t<br />
error possible .<br />
Methods using the above procedure hav e<br />
been introduced by Jacobi (1966), Harder<br />
and Zand (1969), and Brandstetter an d<br />
Amorocho (1970) . It is this method which is<br />
being considered for use in this study . There<br />
are certain distinct advantages associated with<br />
the process . The method is quite general and<br />
can handle a variety of problems such as runoff,<br />
chemical quality of runoff waters, and<br />
suspended sediment predictions, when inpu t<br />
values are properly weighted by functions<br />
describing the physical processes involved in<br />
each case. Once the response functions or<br />
kernels of the system are evaluated, they may<br />
be used for predictions given any sequence o f<br />
inputs. It requires a minimum amount of<br />
data, possibly 1 to 2 years of good records .<br />
Systems can be used in cascade, lik e<br />
predict predict<br />
precip.-runoff quality or sediment<br />
It can be used for quantitative evaluations o f<br />
the changes created by any type of watershe d<br />
management procedure by evaluating th e<br />
kernels of the original and the manage d<br />
hydrologic system. Emphasis will be given to<br />
establishing weighted functions for the bes t<br />
description of the physical process, and o n<br />
deriving tools for the greatest economizatio n<br />
of the procedure .<br />
67
Watershed Stratification :<br />
A Problem on Watershed 10 4<br />
W e have also begun to structure the<br />
hydrologic model for watershed 10 concurrently<br />
with the simulation study underwa y<br />
for watershed 2 and the watershed system s<br />
analysis. Our objective here is to prepare a<br />
fine-resolution hydrologic model which in -<br />
corporates the transpiration model from th e<br />
Primary Producers, the evapotranspiratio n<br />
model from Meteorology, and provides soi l<br />
moisture and subsurface water flow for th e<br />
Primary Producer and Bio-Geochemical Processes<br />
groups . The first step in structuring suc h<br />
a model is system stratification .<br />
One key to the analysis of complex system s<br />
is the compartmentalization of the syste m<br />
into homogeneous subsystems which can the n<br />
4 Authored by George W . Brown, Associate Professor,<br />
Oregon State University, Corvallis .<br />
be isolated for study . This should be done in<br />
such a way that the linkage between compartments<br />
is simple and direct .<br />
Another key is placement of compartmen t<br />
boundaries in such a way that the cells ar e<br />
easily uncoupled, or are coupled as a simpl e<br />
linear cascade . To do otherwise would complicate<br />
the modeling considerably. A hydrologic<br />
model that consists of a series of compartments<br />
arranged as a branching cascade is<br />
extremely difficult to manage . Water flow<br />
from an upper compartment must be some -<br />
how divided between lower compartments in<br />
the cascade. The basis for such division i s<br />
generally obscure and usually arbitrary .<br />
In our attempt to structure the hydrologi c<br />
model for watershed 10 at the next level o f<br />
resolution, we began by setting compartmen t<br />
boundaries along stream courses . This automatically<br />
decoupled the compartments, sinc e<br />
water does not cross the channel (fig . 11) .<br />
Next, it was necessary to consider the arrangement<br />
of the plant communities within<br />
Figure 11. Initial and secondary stratification of watershed 10, H . J. <strong>Andrews</strong> <strong>Experimental</strong> <strong>Forest</strong>, Oregon .<br />
68
the watershed. The hydrologic model and the<br />
primary producer model are obviously linked .<br />
The principal coupling variable betwee n<br />
models is the soil moisture profile . Soil moisture<br />
is that portion of the "hydrologic state "<br />
of the watershed which closely regulates plant<br />
growth. Plants, in turn, influence soil moisture<br />
by transpiration . Thus, superimpositio n<br />
of the primary producer 's vegetative structure<br />
upon the structure of the hydrologic system i s<br />
essential . This structure was combined wit h<br />
the initial hydrologic stratification and de -<br />
fined the subcompartment boundaries . Sub -<br />
compartment boundaries approximate th e<br />
vegetative type-map boundaries and are arranged<br />
into riparian, midslope and ridgeto p<br />
zones. These zones undoubtedly reflect th e<br />
changes in soil moisture regime within th e<br />
watershed . Also, this stratification allows u s<br />
to consider flow between subcompartments a s<br />
simple linear cascades .<br />
This final stratification for watershed 1 0<br />
will provide the basis for sampling schemes t o<br />
characterize soil moisture, water flow and<br />
other hydrologic and biologic processes necessary<br />
for the next round of model construction.<br />
It is essential to note that this stratification<br />
is compatible for modeling hydrologi c<br />
processes and is also compatible for linking<br />
the hydrologic model with that of the primary<br />
producers . It is the major achievement<br />
of our initial modeling effort and sets the<br />
stage for continued progress .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The work reported in this paper was supported<br />
in part by National Science Foundation<br />
Grant No . GB-20963 to the Coniferou s<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Biome, U .S . Analysis of Ecosystems ,<br />
International Biological Program . This is Contribution<br />
No. 24 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong><br />
Biome .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Amorocho, J., and B . Espildora . 1966 . Mathematical<br />
simulation of the snow melting<br />
processes. Univ. Calif. Water Sci. & Eng .<br />
Pap. No. 3001, 156 p . Davis .<br />
Anderson, E. A., and N. H . Crawford . 1964 .<br />
The synthesis of continuous snowmelt run -<br />
off hydrographs on a digital computer .<br />
Stanford Univ ., Dep. Civil Eng. Tech. Rep .<br />
No. 36, 103 p . Palo Alto, Calif .<br />
Barnett, L. O . 1963. Storm runoff characteristics<br />
of three small watersheds in wester n<br />
Oregon. 84 p. M .S. thesis, on file at Colo .<br />
State Univ., Fort Collins .<br />
Brandstetter, A ., and J. Amorocho. 1970 .<br />
Generalized analysis of small watershed<br />
responses. Univ. Calif. Dep. Water Sci . &<br />
Eng . Pap. No. 1035, 204 p . Davis .<br />
Crawford, N. H., and R. K. Linsely . 1964 .<br />
Digital simulation in hydrology : Stanfor d<br />
Watershed Model IV . Stanford Univ . Dep .<br />
Civil Eng . Tech. Rep. No. 39, 210 p . Palo<br />
Alto, Calif .<br />
Dooge, J . C . I. 1965. Analysis of linear systems<br />
by means of Laguerre functions . J .<br />
Soc . Ind . Appl. Math. Cont., A. 2 :<br />
396-408 .<br />
Dyrness, C . T. 1969 . Hydrologic properties o f<br />
soils on three small watersheds in th e<br />
western Cascades of Oregon . USDA <strong>Forest</strong><br />
Serv. Res. Note PNW-111, 17 p . Pac .<br />
Northwest <strong>Forest</strong> & Range Exp . Stn., Portland,<br />
Oreg .<br />
Eagleson, P . S., R. Mejia, and F . March . 1966 .<br />
The computation of optimum realizabl e<br />
unit hydrographs. Water Resour . Res. 2(4) :<br />
755-765 .<br />
Eggleston, Keith O ., Eugene K . Israelsen, and<br />
J . Paul Riley . 1971 . Hybrid computer simulation<br />
of the accumulation and melt processes<br />
in a snowpack . Utah State Univ . Coll .<br />
Eng., Utah Water Res. Lab., Pap. No .<br />
PRWG 65-1, 77 p . Logan, Utah .<br />
Forsythe, G . E . 1957 . Generation and use of<br />
orthogonal polynomials for data-fittin g<br />
with a digital computer . J . Soc. Ind. Appl .<br />
Math. 5(9) : 74 .<br />
Harder, J . A., and S . Zand . 1969 . The identification<br />
of nonlinear hydrologic systems .<br />
Hydraul . Eng. Lab. Tech . Rep . HEL8-2, 8 3<br />
p. Univ. Calif., Berkeley .<br />
Hildebrand, F . B. 1958. Methods of applie d<br />
mathematics . 523 p. New York : Prentice -<br />
Hall .<br />
69
Jacobi, S . L. S. 1966. A mathematical mode l<br />
for nonlinear hydrologic systems . J. Geol .<br />
Res. 71 : 4811 .<br />
Jones, A. 1971 . Soil piping and stream channel<br />
initiation. Water Resour . Res. 7(3) :<br />
602-610 .<br />
Nash, J. E . 1957 . The form of the instantaneous<br />
unit hydrograph. Int. Assoc. Sci .<br />
Hydrol . Gen. Assem. Toronto, Proc ., 3 :<br />
114-121 .<br />
. 1960. A unit hydrograph study<br />
with particular reference to British catchments<br />
. Inst . Civil. Eng. (Proc.) 17 :<br />
249-282 .<br />
O ' Donnell, T . 1960. Instantaneous unit<br />
hydrograph derivation by harmonic analysis.<br />
Assoc . Sci. Hydrol. Publ. No. 51, p .<br />
546-557 .<br />
Pysklywec, D . W., K. S. Davar, D . I. Bray .<br />
1968 . Snowmelt at an index plot. Water<br />
Resour. Res . 45 : 937-946 .<br />
Riley, J. P ., D . G . Chadwick, and J . M .<br />
Bagley. 1966. Application of electroni c<br />
analog computer to solution of hydrologi c<br />
and river-basin-planning problem : Utah<br />
Simulation Model II . Utah State Univ . ,<br />
Utah Water Res . Lab. PRWG 32-1, 121 p .<br />
Logan, Utah .<br />
Rothacher, Jack. 1963 . Net precipitation<br />
under a Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii)<br />
forest. <strong>Forest</strong> Sci . 9 : 4 .<br />
, C . T. Dyrness, and Richard L .<br />
Fredriksen . 1967. Hydrologic and related<br />
characteristics of three small watersheds in<br />
the Oregon Cascades . USDA <strong>Forest</strong> Serv .<br />
Pac. Northwest <strong>Forest</strong> & Range Exp . Stn . ,<br />
54 p. Portland, Oreg.<br />
Shih, C . C. 1971. A simulation model for predicting<br />
the effects of weather modificatio n<br />
on runoff characteristics . 116 p . Ph.D .<br />
thesis, on file at Utah State Univ ., Logan .<br />
Sittner, W. T., C. E. Schauss, and J . C . Monro .<br />
1969. Continuous hydrograph synthesi s<br />
with an API-type hydrologic model . Water<br />
Resour . Res. 5(10) : 1007-1022 .<br />
Snyder, W. M. 1955. Hydrograph analysis b y<br />
the method of least squares . Am . Soc . Civil<br />
Eng. Proc., J. Hydraul . Div. 81(793), 25 p .<br />
U .S. Army Corps of Engineers . 1956 . Summary<br />
report of snow investigations, sno w<br />
hydrology . 437 p . Portland, Oreg.<br />
U .S . Department of Agriculture . 1964 . Irrigation<br />
water requirements . Soil Conserv .<br />
Serv. Eng . Div . Tech. Release No . 21 . Washington,<br />
D .C .<br />
Veihmeyer, F . J. 1964 . Evapotranspiration . In<br />
Ven to Chow (ed.), Handbook of applie d<br />
hydrology, p . 11-1 to 11-23 . New York :<br />
McGraw-Hill .<br />
70
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 1972 .<br />
Preliminary consideration s<br />
of the forest canopy<br />
consumer subsystem<br />
M. A. Strand and W . P . Nagel<br />
Oregon State University<br />
Corvallis, Orego n<br />
Abstract<br />
A food chain beginning with herbaceous materials produced in the forest canopy is delineated as a<br />
subsystem. A conceptual model of energy flow through this subsystem includes assumptions and definitions<br />
relating to components of the canopy food chain, processes by which energy is transferred, and the energ y<br />
pathways. From this conceptual model, it is observed that the canopy food chain is directly coupled to othe r<br />
consumer subsystems through common predators and through the detritus component . Besides the direct<br />
relationship through the food base to primary production, this subsystem may also influence the plant syste m<br />
by its effects on the sites ofplant hormone production and on the fate of mobile nutrients in the ecosystem .<br />
Introduction<br />
In the past, modeling efforts concernin g<br />
consumers have been centered on populatio n<br />
dynamics, while more recently energetics hav e<br />
been receiving attention . Our consideration s<br />
of consumers will also concern energy transfer.<br />
We will focus on the couplings betwee n<br />
consumers and other parts of the ecosystem .<br />
These couplings may be direct (i .e., involve<br />
energy transfer to or from a consumer) o r<br />
indirect (i .e., involve the influence of on e<br />
component on energy transfer between othe r<br />
components of the ecosystem) . The majo r<br />
subdivisions of the ecosystem are discussed b y<br />
Overton (1972) .<br />
To facilitate our understanding of th e<br />
consumer system, it would be convenient t o<br />
subdivide it into a hierarchical set of units an d<br />
observe the couplings between them and their<br />
couplings with other ecosystem components .<br />
If our units are to be subsystems, then th e<br />
most logical divisions would occur aroun d<br />
groups of components with high degrees o f<br />
interconnections. The majority of linkage s<br />
with a subsystem's components should occu r<br />
within the subsystem ; couplings to components<br />
of other subsystems should be comparatively<br />
rare. The classic way to defin e<br />
consumer subsystems has been by trophi c<br />
levels; however, for our purpose this divisio n<br />
may not be the most meaningful one . By<br />
basing the division of the consumer system o n<br />
trophic level designations, the direct linkage s<br />
with regard to energy flow occur between th e<br />
subsystems and only indirect linkages, such a s<br />
competition, occur within them . We hypothesize<br />
that a better subdivision of the consumer<br />
system could be made by defining th e<br />
subsystems as food chains on the basis of a<br />
stratification of their primary food base .<br />
The first division in our hierarchy will b e<br />
into grazing and detritus food chains . Th e<br />
grazing food chain includes primary consumers<br />
feeding on plant material and a serie s<br />
of secondary consumers that prey on the<br />
herbivores and on each other . To further<br />
subdivide this food chain, the food base i s<br />
stratified into forest canopy herbaceous material,<br />
woody material, forest floor herbaceou s<br />
material, and roots . Food chains are define d<br />
by the food material eaten by the primar y<br />
consumers in the chain . Likewise, the detritu s<br />
food chain which recycles detritus to lowe r<br />
71
grades of detritus is divided according t o<br />
particle size. The two resulting food chain s<br />
use fine or coarse detritus as their primar y<br />
food sources. By uncoupling these six foo d<br />
chains (four grazing and two detritus) with<br />
regard to their food bases, the first orde r<br />
consumers are reasonably unique to a particular<br />
food chain subsystem, while commo n<br />
predators couple the subsystems together .<br />
The purposes of this paper will be to defin e<br />
the forest canopy food chain and to develop a<br />
conceptual model of it as an example of th e<br />
type of preliminary consideration which is a<br />
prerequisite to mathematical modeling.<br />
The forest canopy food chain forms a<br />
subsystem that begins with herbaceous material<br />
produced by trees and follows it throug h<br />
its many transfers to detritus . The food bas e<br />
is primarily photosynthetic tissue, needles an d<br />
leaves of trees ; however, buds, young twigs ,<br />
immature cones, and seeds will also be included,<br />
since consumption of these foods i s<br />
an interrelated process . For present considerations,<br />
we will confine our concern to an<br />
old-growth, coniferous forest canopy . Successional<br />
changes, epidemic outbreaks, an d<br />
environmental gradients will not be include d<br />
in our discussions . It is assumed that variations<br />
in energy flow from year to year are no t<br />
appreciable, so there are periods of short-ter m<br />
stability . The conceptual model we will pro -<br />
pose is a description of this type of stabl e<br />
condition .<br />
Our discussion will consist of four parts :<br />
the components of the subsystem, the processes<br />
involved in energy transfer, energy path -<br />
ways, and the interconnections between thi s<br />
and other food chain subsystems as well a s<br />
the subsystems defined by Overton (1972) i n<br />
this symposium . In each section we wil l<br />
present a set of assumptions and definition s<br />
that represent our notion of this subsystem .<br />
The set will form our conceptual model .<br />
Components<br />
The components of a subsystem are the<br />
locations of energy storage and vehicles o f<br />
energy transfer along the food chain . Components<br />
are defined by ecological function<br />
rather than taxonomic criteria . However great<br />
species diversity might be in a forest canopy ,<br />
functional roles are common to many species ,<br />
enabling them to be regarded as a few larg e<br />
populations. To avoid the pitfall of over -<br />
generalization about the superpopulations, a<br />
brief discussion of the variations of behavio r<br />
relevent to energy transfer of our components<br />
is included .<br />
Primary consumers are the key links in th e<br />
food chains, diverting energy produced by th e<br />
plants into the animal system . In the fores t<br />
canopy most consumers are insect grazers<br />
which feed mainly on new tissue from expanding<br />
needles or leaves (Keen 1952) . The<br />
feeding stage either hatches or emerges near a<br />
feeding site, so that food finding initially i s<br />
not a problem . Many of them feed gregariously<br />
when larvae are small, but disperse t o<br />
"feed singly later. The main disseminatio n<br />
phase, however, is the adult where female s<br />
seek out new feeding sites for oviposition .<br />
The feeding period occurs primarily in th e<br />
spring and early summer with resting phase s<br />
(pupae, eggs, or overwintering larvae) beginning<br />
in late August or early September . A<br />
second group of primary consumers include s<br />
insects with sucking mouth parts . They act as<br />
physiological sinks and remove dissolve d<br />
nutrients from the xylem sap (Way an d<br />
Cammell 1970). Only one significant vertebrate<br />
foliage feeder has been reported in th e<br />
forest canopy-the red tree mouse (Phenacomys<br />
longicaudus) (Maser 1966). It eats<br />
needles of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii )<br />
leaving the central xylem strand . Smal l<br />
branches are cut and carried to the nest where<br />
they are consumed .<br />
Plant reproductive tissues are also consumed.<br />
Immature cones are attached mainl y<br />
by cone and seed feeding insects ; some fee d<br />
exclusively on the seeds, while others feed o n<br />
the cone preventing seed development . Mature<br />
seed may be consumed prior to dissemination<br />
by certain birds and squirrels . Thes e<br />
omnivorous birds use seeds as a primary foo d<br />
source during the winter ; they remove undisseminated<br />
seeds while the cones are stil l<br />
attached to the tree (Isaac 1943) . Squirrel s<br />
cut cones and extract the seeds on th e<br />
ground ; the subsequent fate of the seeds i s<br />
72
considered as part of another food chai n<br />
subsystem which utilizes forest floor herbaceous<br />
material .<br />
Predators and parasites constitute the nex t<br />
links in the food chain . Small invertebrate s<br />
are consumed generally by other invertebrates<br />
. Parasitic forms may feed on larvae ,<br />
pupae, or eggs of the host . Often several<br />
generations of parasites are produced for<br />
every single host generation ; hyperparasitis m<br />
of several degrees is possible. Predaceous<br />
invertebrates include both spiders and insects .<br />
Some, as the orb-spinning spiders, wait fo r<br />
mobile forms to be trapped, while other s<br />
move about actively in search of food an d<br />
feed on nearly any invertebrate they ca n<br />
capture (Graham 1952) .<br />
During the mating and nesting season ,<br />
omnivorous birds feed on insects with eg g<br />
hatch often being correlated with peak insec t<br />
abundance (Lack 1954) . Very small larvae are<br />
usually not eaten since they are inconspicuou s<br />
and many would be required to satisfy a<br />
bird 's energy needs . Flycatchers, which ar e<br />
not abundant in the winter, breed in the<br />
forest canopy and feed mainly on adult<br />
insects . Other insectivorous birds search th e<br />
foliage for the larger larvae . Predation of adult<br />
birds is rare, but nest predators may be foun d<br />
consuming both eggs and young nestlings .<br />
Other predatory birds are also rare components<br />
of the forest canopy ; however, th e<br />
spotted owl (Strix occidentalis) is an important<br />
predator of vertebrate foliage feeder s<br />
(Nussbaum 1972 1 ) .<br />
The components of the forest canopy food<br />
chain are restricted to those animals that ca n<br />
complete at least the feeding stages of their<br />
life cycles above the shrub stratum. In our<br />
considerations of the forest canopy, we hav e<br />
restricted ourselves to endemic population<br />
conditions and have not considered the larg e<br />
numbers of defoliators found in some areas .<br />
The actual population densities found under<br />
"normal" circumstances is not known for th e<br />
old-growth stands, and estimates of thes e<br />
densities will be a subject of future research .<br />
We will consider herbivores to be predator<br />
limited and predators to be food limited . All<br />
' Personal communication .<br />
components will be assumed to be balanced<br />
with respect to immigration and emigration<br />
except for seasonally migrating birds .<br />
In summary, we have designated nine<br />
superpopulations or components in the forest<br />
canopy food chain subsystem : grazing insects ,<br />
sucking insects, vertebrate foliage feeders ,<br />
seed and cone insects, omnivorous birds ,<br />
parasitic invertebrates, predaceous invertebrates,<br />
nest predators, and other predator y<br />
birds. Energy flow will be followed between<br />
these components ; possible transfers within<br />
them will not be considered explicitly .<br />
Processes<br />
Certain processes are essential for the transfer<br />
of energy, and we have defined five main<br />
processes for the food chain subsystems :<br />
consumption, elimination, respiration, assimilation,<br />
and death . The definitions we use may<br />
not be the same as those found in ecologica l<br />
literature, but our definitions are consistent<br />
with the purpose of defining direct couplings<br />
within and between the food chains and other<br />
subsystems of the ecosystem .<br />
The concept of consumption is often<br />
equated with ingestion ; however, the importance<br />
of consumers may not be measured by<br />
what they ingest alone . Shelter building an d<br />
wasteful feeding behavior may result in fa r<br />
greater death of the food resource than th e<br />
amount ingested. Hence consumption wil l<br />
include ingestion as well as other activities o f<br />
the animals that result in the loss of life o f<br />
their food. All forms of waste production b y<br />
animals after the food is ingested is include d<br />
in the process of elimination . Thus, energ y<br />
lost as a result of indigestion, metaboli c<br />
wastes, or losses of integument will be transferred<br />
to detritus via elimination. Assimilatio n<br />
is defined as individual secondary production .<br />
It is the process by which energy from on e<br />
trophic level is incorporated into the tissue of<br />
the next. The process of respiration include s<br />
the energy loss to the atmospheric sink as th e<br />
result of maintenance metabolism and o f<br />
work. Death includes mortality losses as a<br />
result of factors other than consumption b y<br />
another component of a food chain. Both the<br />
73
processes of death and elimination result i n<br />
the production of detritus, but they must b e<br />
considered separately since they differ in their<br />
consequences to the food chain components .<br />
Elimination does not affect the potentia l<br />
activity of a component, whereas, death may .<br />
The purpose of defining these five processes<br />
is to identify the means by whic h<br />
components are directly coupled with eac h<br />
other or with other subsystems of the ecosystem.<br />
Each one is influenced by indirec t<br />
couplings . For example, feeding behavior ,<br />
population age structure, and energy demand s<br />
are indirect couplings between the feeding<br />
population and the process of consumption .<br />
Nutritional quality of the food may influenc e<br />
the processes of assimilation and elimination .<br />
These indirect couplings may be thought of as<br />
informational transfers and may be as impor -<br />
tant to the system as the direct couplings .<br />
Energy Pathways<br />
The general energy pathway is diagramme d<br />
in figure 1 . The boxes are used to show sites<br />
of energy storage . They are associated with a<br />
set of variables which are used to describe the<br />
site. The consumed tissue compartment is a<br />
hypothetical site but is included to separate<br />
the processes of consumption and assimilation<br />
. Circles are used to indicate the processe s<br />
which are employed to transfer energy between<br />
sites . Solid arrows mean true flows of<br />
materials or energy (direct couplings), whil e<br />
dotted arrows and diamonds indicate lines o f<br />
influence (indirect couplings) from an energ y<br />
storage site to a process .<br />
= Consumption<br />
WO<br />
0<br />
0<br />
= Waste (Subproces s<br />
of consumption<br />
= Assimilatio n<br />
Respiration<br />
= Death<br />
= Elimination<br />
4<br />
Food quality an d<br />
availabilit y<br />
Population ag e<br />
structure<br />
Food quality<br />
Food qualit y<br />
Population feeding an d<br />
sheltering behavio r<br />
Abiotic environmen t<br />
Figure 1 . Basic energy pathway through food chain subsystem . See text for explanation of symbols .<br />
74
PRIMARY PRRODUCTIO N<br />
■<br />
FOLIAGE<br />
C<strong>ON</strong>ES AN D<br />
SEEDS<br />
r<br />
GRAZIN G<br />
VERTEBRATE S<br />
GRAZIN G<br />
INSECTS<br />
SUCKIN G<br />
INSECTS<br />
SEED AN D<br />
C<strong>ON</strong>E INSECTS<br />
f<br />
V<br />
PREDACEOU S<br />
BIRDS<br />
PARASITI C<br />
INVERTEBRATES<br />
PREDACEOUS<br />
INVERTEBRATE S<br />
Figure 2 . The major energy pathways between components of the forest canopy food chain .<br />
The paths of energy (fig. 2) may be<br />
followed beginning in the spring when th e<br />
buds of the conifers swell and insect herbivores<br />
emerge and feed . While they are small ,<br />
the grazing and sucking insects are preyed<br />
upon by other invertebrates . Later they are<br />
preyed upon by birds that switch from<br />
conifer seeds to insect larvae during thei r<br />
breeding season . Energy leaves the system in<br />
the form of food for predators in other foo d<br />
chains, migrating birds, detritus, and heat .<br />
The amounts of energy following these routes<br />
is not known yet . Consumption rates, relative<br />
densities of consumers, food quality variability,<br />
assimilation efficiencies, an d<br />
migration habits are also not known for mos t<br />
of the consumers . These problems will require<br />
further research before the model may b e<br />
quantified. The two diagrams and the definitions<br />
and assumptions that were outlined i n<br />
the preceding sections represent our curren t<br />
conceptual model of the canopy food chain .<br />
Interconnections with<br />
Other Subsystem s<br />
The conceptual model presented here of<br />
the forest canopy consumer subsystem ma y<br />
be used to describe possible interrelation s<br />
between it and other subsystems. By definition,<br />
this subsystem contains consumers tha t<br />
feed primarily in the forest canopy ; therefore ,<br />
we would not expect it to be tightly coupled<br />
to other food chains . However, since the food<br />
base defines the subsystem and, in the case of<br />
the canopy food chain, herbivores are mor e<br />
specific in food habits than the carnivores, it<br />
is evident that direct couplings will probabl y<br />
result from the feeding behavior of th e<br />
secondary consumers . For example, adul t<br />
insects from other subsystems may serve as<br />
food for flycatcher birds which live primaril y<br />
in the canopy . Predaceous invertebrates from<br />
the forest floor feed upon canopy specie s<br />
75
when they move to the floor for overwintering<br />
or pupation. The food chain with primary<br />
consumers that feed on fine detritus i s<br />
coupled to this subsystem through the detritus<br />
output, and the canopy food chain ma y<br />
influence the energy flow rates within th e<br />
detritus food chain by the quality of its<br />
detrital outputs .<br />
Besides these connections with other foo d<br />
chain subsystems, the canopy consumers ar e<br />
closely linked to the primary productio n<br />
system . The consumers are influenced by th e<br />
quantity and quality of herbaceous materia l<br />
produced by the trees . However, the influence<br />
of the canopy food chain on primary production<br />
is more subtle. Although consumption o f<br />
foliage or cones is not considered to be at a<br />
rate to affect production in the old-growt h<br />
canopy of the model, the preferential consumption<br />
of new needles and expanding cone s<br />
may affect the nutrient capital of the trees .<br />
These consumption sites are physiologica l<br />
sinks, and mobile nutrients are actively moved<br />
to them from senescent foliage and storag e<br />
sites (Sweet and Wareing 1966) . The loss o f<br />
these sinks may mean the return of certain<br />
nutrients to the soil solution rather than thei r<br />
retention by the trees (Rafes 1970) . Also ,<br />
consumption of bud tips reduces the sites o f<br />
growth hormone production ; this hormone i s<br />
necessary for cambial division, and loca l<br />
deficiencies may result from the gregariou s<br />
feeding habits of some herbivores (Kozlowsk i<br />
1969). These indirect couplings may prove t o<br />
be the most significant role of the food chai n<br />
subsystems in the old-growth forest .<br />
Summary<br />
The consumer system is composed of a<br />
series of grazing and detritus food chains . Th e<br />
primary consumers are thought to be reason -<br />
ably unique to each food chain, and direc t<br />
energy transfers between the food chain s<br />
occur via common predators . The processes of<br />
energy transfer that link the components of<br />
the food chains with each other and the rest<br />
of the ecosystem are : consumption, assimilation,<br />
elimination, respiration, and death. Indirect<br />
links are formed by informational transfers<br />
which influence energy flows .<br />
The forest canopy food chain includes the<br />
primary consumers that feed on herbaceous<br />
material produced in the canopy and the<br />
series of related predators . This food chain is<br />
directly linked to primary production by<br />
consumption of herbaceous materials, to th e<br />
other food chains by common predators, and<br />
to the detritus component through production<br />
of detrital material . Primary productio n<br />
influences the food chain processes by variations<br />
in nutritional quality, spatial arrangement,<br />
and quantity of material produced . Th e<br />
influences of the food chain on primar y<br />
production are more subtle . Preferential feeding<br />
habits of many canopy grazers affect th e<br />
number of sites of plant hormone productio n<br />
and the fate of mobile nutrients in th e<br />
ecosystem .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The work reported in this paper wa s<br />
supported by National Science Foundatio n<br />
Grant No. GB-20963 to the Coniferous Fores t<br />
Biome, U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems, International<br />
Biological Program . This is Contributio n<br />
No . 25 from the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome .<br />
76
Graham, S. A. 1952. <strong>Forest</strong> entomology . 35 1<br />
p., illus. New York : McGraw-Hill Book Co . ,<br />
Inc .<br />
Isaac, L. A. 1943. Reproductive habits of<br />
Douglas-fir . 107 p ., illus. Washington, D .C . :<br />
Charles Lathrop Pack For . Found .<br />
Keen, F . P. 1952. Insect enemies of western<br />
forests. U .S. Dep. Agric. Misc. Publ . 273 :<br />
75-126 .<br />
Kozlowski, T . T. 1969. Tree physiology ' an d<br />
forest pests . J. For. 67 : 118-122 .<br />
Lack, David . 1954. The natural regulation of<br />
animal numbers. 343 p., illus. Oxford ,<br />
England: Clarendon Press .<br />
Maser, C . O. 1966 . Life histories and ecology<br />
of Phenacomys albipes, Phenacomys longicaudus,<br />
Phenacomys siluicola . M .S. thesis<br />
on file, Oreg . State Univ., Corvallis .<br />
Overton, W . S. 1972 . Toward a general model<br />
structure for a forest ecosystem . In Jerry F .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Franklin, L. J. Dempster, and Richard H .<br />
Waring (eds .), Proceedings-research on<br />
coniferous forest ecosystems-a symposium,<br />
p . 37-47, illus . Pac . Northwest <strong>Forest</strong><br />
& Range Exp . Stn., Portland, Oreg .<br />
Rafes, P. M. 1970. Estimation of the effect s<br />
of phytophagous insects on forest production<br />
. In D. E. Reichle (ed .), Analysis of<br />
temperate forest ecosystems, p . 100-106 .<br />
Berlin : Springer-Verlag .<br />
Sweet, G . B., and P. F. Wareing. 1966. Role<br />
of plant growth in regulating photosynthesis.<br />
Nature 210 : 77-79 .<br />
Way, M . J., and M. Cammell . 1970. Aggregation<br />
behavior in relation to food utilizatio n<br />
by aphids . In A . Watson (ed.), Animal<br />
populations in relation to their food re -<br />
sources, p. 229-247. Oxford, England :<br />
Blackwell Sci . Pub .<br />
77
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
An environmental grid fo r<br />
classifying coniferous<br />
forest ecosystems<br />
R . H . Waring,<br />
K . L . Reed,<br />
W. H . Emmingham<br />
School of <strong>Forest</strong>ry<br />
Oregon State Universit y<br />
Corvallis, Orego n<br />
Abstract<br />
To develop models which will predict primary production and forest composition across the Biome, we<br />
suggest that the environment be defined operationally-as it affects certain plant responses . Models can be<br />
developed which indicate how water, nutrients, light, temperature, and mechanical factors interact through th e<br />
plant to control primary production and plant composition. Plant responses including water stress, stomatal<br />
behavior, foliar nutrition, and phenology, among others, were coupled to environmental variables to create plan t<br />
response indices for soil moisture, temperature, transpiration, and soil fertility . By correlating indicator species<br />
with plant response indices, an ecosystem can be defined environmentally without direct measurements . Other<br />
processes including biogeochemical cycling, consumer population dynamics, and hydrologic functions may als o<br />
be related to the environmental grid.<br />
Introduction<br />
Diversity in environment and vegetation i s<br />
characteristic of the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome .<br />
Such diversity is esthetically pleasing but presents<br />
formidable problems of classification .<br />
Classification is necessary, however, if we ar e<br />
to understand the processes which affect the<br />
composition and allow for continued productivity<br />
of the forests and related water, wild -<br />
life, and recreational resources .<br />
If we could understand how the environment<br />
influences forest growth and composition,<br />
we would be well on the way toward<br />
reassessing our past management successe s<br />
and failures . We could also make our detailed<br />
ecosystem studies more widely applicable in<br />
both time and space, thus providing a frame -<br />
work for intelligent land management. Th e<br />
problem lies (a) in identifying which proper -<br />
ties of the environment should be measured ,<br />
(b) coupling these to important biological<br />
processes, and (c) finally in predicting certai n<br />
key properties of ecosystems .<br />
In this paper we attempt to establish a conceptual<br />
basis for evaluating environment, then<br />
test the general approach, and finally suggest<br />
necessary modifications to permit extensio n<br />
across the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome .<br />
General Theory<br />
The Operational Environment<br />
Excellent descriptions of vegetation and<br />
regional physiography exist for many region s<br />
of the world . In the Pacific Northwest the<br />
most thorough treatments have been provide d<br />
by Daubenmire (1952), Krajina (1965), and<br />
Franklin and Dyrness (1969) . Detailed<br />
physiographic classification such as that developed<br />
by Hills (1959) has proven most use-<br />
79
ful in regions with relatively uniform climate .<br />
Probably the most helpful classifications<br />
from a standpoint of predicting the nature o f<br />
forest ecosystems, however, have been thos e<br />
related to environmental gradients (Warming<br />
1909, Sukachev 1928, Pogrebnjak 1929 ,<br />
Bakuzis 1961, Ellenberg 1950, 1956, Row e<br />
1956, Whittaker 1956, 1960, Loucks 1962 ,<br />
Waring and Major 1964) . Unfortunately, al<br />
previously defined environmental gradient s<br />
cannot be directly applied outside the particular<br />
region where they were developed . We feel<br />
environmental gradients can be more widel y<br />
utilized only when the environment i s<br />
coupled to basic processes controlling plan t<br />
growth and composition . We believe a key t o<br />
expanding the gradient analysis approach is t o<br />
focus more closely upon the basic physiological<br />
behavior of plants .<br />
Fortunately a foundation for a process -<br />
oriented approach has already been laid .<br />
Mason and Langenheim (1957) defined th e<br />
idea of an "operational environment" as on e<br />
which directly affects an organism. Implicit i n<br />
their concept of environment is the recognition<br />
of specific plant responses to environmental<br />
stimuli. In fact, these authors felt tha t<br />
"environment" could not exist independently<br />
in an ecological sense . It must have an effec t<br />
upon an organism . Although they did not de -<br />
fine measurable environmental stimuli, thei r<br />
very definition of an "operational environment"<br />
focuses attention upon the influenc e<br />
rather than on the origin of the stimulus .<br />
Thus, in an interpretive ecological sense, i t<br />
is more important to assess the availability o f<br />
water to plant roots than the origin of tha t<br />
water. This distinction greatly reduces the<br />
number of factors requiring consideration, for<br />
although altitude, slope, and other physiographic<br />
features are correlated with vegetation,<br />
such indirectly operating factors may be<br />
ignored if the mode of action can be identified<br />
and measured . Ellenberg (1956), Bakuzis<br />
(1961), Waring and Major (1964), and other s<br />
have suggested that vegetation responds t o<br />
changes in water, temperature, light, and<br />
chemical and mechanical factors. Although<br />
these factors do not operate independently ,<br />
they cannot completely substitute for one<br />
another .<br />
General Approac h<br />
We still have to translate the concept of an<br />
"operational environment" into a design adequate<br />
for research . As a first step we can diagram<br />
the flow of material through a plant into<br />
various compartments and identify the controls<br />
on the rate of flow imposed by the<br />
environment, the organism, or the amount o f<br />
material in a given compartment. Figure 1<br />
Figure 1 . General model of primary production .<br />
Material inputs of H 2 0, CO 2 . and energy flow int o<br />
the system to form carbohydrates . The rate of incorporation<br />
(photosynthesis) is a function of<br />
various plant responses. These responses are<br />
triggered by a host of environmental stimuli :<br />
temperature, light, humidity, soil water potential ,<br />
soil fertility, and mechanical stress. The plant<br />
responses interact to provide two functions: (1) a<br />
control on carbohydrate storage and (2) a contro l<br />
on growth. Losses from the system are throug h<br />
respiration (R), death of roots and other organ s<br />
and in litter (L), and consumption by animals (C) .<br />
presents such a diagramatic model . Th e<br />
rectangles are the compartments, and the flo w<br />
of materials is indicated by solid lines, whil e<br />
dotted lines indicate the transfer of information<br />
through valves controlling the rate of<br />
material flow from one compartment to an -<br />
80
other. The plant integrates environmenta l<br />
stimuli. Arrows indicate the direction of flow ,<br />
and circles are special functions regulated b y<br />
information from the plant integrator .<br />
We interpret environmental variables as<br />
being external to the system and impingin g<br />
upon it . The system, in this case the organism ,<br />
responds only in accordance to the externa l<br />
stimuli. Modifications in the environmen t<br />
brought about by the organism itself are no t<br />
distinguished from those originating throug h<br />
other means .<br />
The amount of material transfer from environment<br />
to plant is determined by the kin d<br />
and magnitude of the response ; i .e., the<br />
amount of CO2 converted into carbohydrate<br />
is determined by the photosynthetic rate . The<br />
amount of carbohydrate utilized in th e<br />
growth of foliage, stem, and roots is also<br />
affected by the stage of plant development<br />
and other plant responses . As long as the carbohydrate<br />
pool does not become exhausted ,<br />
or one of the plant responses is not death,<br />
biomass can accumulate .<br />
When the environment initiates a letha l<br />
plant response, the transfer of carbohydrate s<br />
is stopped and all of the biomass compartments<br />
empty . Biomass loss also occur s<br />
through respiration, consumption by animals,<br />
the normal fall of litter, and death of roots<br />
and twigs .<br />
Unfortunately, we do not, at present, have<br />
adequate knowledge for complete evaluatio n<br />
of such an energy flow model, even for a<br />
single species . We hope to acquire muc h<br />
needed data through the Biome program. Still<br />
it is safe to say that we will lack complete<br />
data on most species to predict accurately th e<br />
system 's response to external variables . Our<br />
approach, therefore, is to study physiologica l<br />
responses in relation to the environment ,<br />
develop functional models, and from thes e<br />
create plant response indices as a means of<br />
interpreting environmental gradients . Further ,<br />
we propose to correlate ecosystem propertie s<br />
with these plant response indices . Figure 2<br />
ENVIR<strong>ON</strong>MENTA L<br />
STIMUL I<br />
Absolute Humidit y<br />
Radiation<br />
Air & Soil Temperature<br />
Soil Wate r<br />
Soil Fertility<br />
Wind and Snow<br />
PLANT RESP<strong>ON</strong>SE<br />
INDICES<br />
ECOSYSTE M<br />
CHARACTERISTIC S<br />
Plant Moisture Stress<br />
Productivity<br />
Transpiratio n<br />
Compositio n<br />
PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />
CALIBRATI<strong>ON</strong><br />
j---* Photosynthesi s _<br />
Hydrologic Stat e<br />
PROCESS MODELS<br />
VALIDATI<strong>ON</strong><br />
Nutritional<br />
Decomposition<br />
4<br />
PREDICTI<strong>ON</strong><br />
Temperature Growth Consumer Population s<br />
Mechanical Stress<br />
/<br />
/ PHYSIOLOGICA L<br />
/ BEHAVIO R<br />
Stomatal Respons e<br />
Cambial Activity<br />
Photosynthesi s<br />
Transpiration<br />
Plant Moisture Stres s<br />
Phenology<br />
Foliar Nutritio n<br />
Figure 2 . Physiological process models couple environmental stimuli to the physiological behavior of selecte d<br />
conifers . From an understanding of the process models, plant response indices are derived which reflec t<br />
major environmental gradients . These indices locate ecosystems within an environmental grid and throug h<br />
correlation permit certain ecosystem characteristics to be predicted .<br />
8 1
epresents the basic linkages between environmental<br />
stimuli, physiological behavior, an d<br />
the generation of plant response indices whic h<br />
are to be correlated with ecosyste m<br />
characteristics .<br />
The Organis m<br />
If we strive for both a predictive model and<br />
an understanding of the general processes con -<br />
trolling plant composition, we must compromise<br />
by linking observations of plant distribution<br />
and growth for many species to th e<br />
physiological behavior of certain trees . For i n<br />
this Biome, trees represent the dominant for m<br />
in which energy accumulates in forest ecosystems<br />
.<br />
The size of reference plants must also b e<br />
standardized . Although establishment is critical<br />
for determining the composition of an y<br />
plant community, young seedlings represen t<br />
both adapted and ill-adapted plants . Mature<br />
plants, on the other hand, are usually so well<br />
established that their responses only hint at<br />
the critical selective factors operating at th e<br />
time of establishment and early growth . As a<br />
compromise, in this Biome we study recently<br />
established conifers between 1-2 m tall . Few<br />
such trees will die during the course of measurements<br />
; yet they are small enough to<br />
reflect the major environmental forces actin g<br />
at the critical time of establishment .<br />
Having decided upon the important environmental<br />
factors and the size and kind of<br />
reference plant, we are still faced wit h<br />
coupling the environment to plant responses .<br />
The most commonly selected response has<br />
been growth in some form or another, bu t<br />
growth reflects the total integration of al l<br />
environmental influences and a host of different<br />
environmental combinations can resul t<br />
in similar productivity . We choose response s<br />
related to the entire plant, but those whic h<br />
may be more closely identified with specifi c<br />
environmental stimuli .<br />
Physiological Behavior<br />
Because plants are a complex system, no<br />
response is completely unrelated to another .<br />
Therefore most responses cannot be inter -<br />
preted without knowledge of others, and<br />
cause and effect relationships can rarely b e<br />
implied. The most important behavior<br />
includes :<br />
1. Phenological development . This reflects<br />
past environment and serves to define<br />
periods during which the sensitivity of<br />
the plant is similar. Lack of attention to<br />
phenological development is a majo r<br />
reason why otherwise good environmental<br />
data are often difficult to interpret<br />
ecologically (Azzi 1955) .<br />
2. Carbon dioxide exchange provides a<br />
ready means of quantifying the effect s<br />
of light and temperature upon photo -<br />
synthesis .<br />
3. Plant moisture stress (plant water potential)<br />
before dawn is an excellent measur e<br />
of how a reference plant responds to soil<br />
water status.<br />
4. Stomatal resistance reflects the influenc e<br />
of evaporative stress and soil drought, a s<br />
well as certain other environmental variables<br />
.<br />
5. Foliar nutrition indicates the interactio n<br />
between supply of nutrients in the soil<br />
and the demand for nutrients .<br />
Results of Past Studie s<br />
To help clarify the above discussion, we<br />
draw upon our experience during the last 8<br />
years in an environmentally and floristicall y<br />
diverse region of southwestern Oregon (Whit -<br />
taker 1960, 1961 ; Waring 1969) .<br />
At all or some of the 25 forest stand s<br />
described briefly in table 1, environmental<br />
data on air and soil temperature, radiation,<br />
humidity, soil moisture, and soil fertility were<br />
recorded . Physiological response studies o n<br />
two widely distributed conifers, Douglas-fi r<br />
(Pseudotsuga menziesii) and Shasta red fir<br />
(Abies magnifica var . shastensis), included observations<br />
of phenology, plant water potential,<br />
stomatal resistance, and foliar nutrition .<br />
Productivity was estimated by measuring terminal<br />
elongation or total height of dominant<br />
old-growth trees. Details of this work hav e<br />
been published elsewhere (Waring and Clear y<br />
1967, Waring 1969, Atzet and Waring 1970 ,<br />
82
Table 1.-Description of stands<br />
Stand Elevation 1 Slope Aspect Parent material Dominant vegetation<br />
Meters<br />
Percent<br />
3 780 45 N Granite Douglas-fir, black oak,<br />
ponderosa pine<br />
21 550 75 N Metavolcanic Douglas-fir, black oak,<br />
Oregon white oa k<br />
8 1,280 40 SW Granite Ponderosa pine, Douglas-fi r<br />
12 1,585 70 WSW Green schist Ponderosa pine, Douglas-fir<br />
1 1,490 25 W Granite White fir, ponderosa pine ,<br />
Douglas-fir<br />
11 1,370 35 SW Granite Ponderosa pine, sugar pine ,<br />
white fir, Douglas-fi r<br />
13 1,340 20 W Green schist Douglas-fir, ponderosa pine ,<br />
sugar pine, white fir<br />
19 1,250 70 W Mica schist Douglas-fir, sugar pine,<br />
white fir<br />
2 1,675 60 WNW Granite White fir, Douglas-fir<br />
9 1,550 55 NNW Metavolcanic White fir, sugar pine ,<br />
Shasta red fir<br />
14 1,585 45 E Green schist Douglas-fir, white fir<br />
22 1,460 50 N Metasedimentary Douglas-fir, white fir<br />
7 1,920 20 N Granite Shasta red fi r<br />
16 1,890 40 SW Mica schist Shasta red fi r<br />
17 1,830 10 E Metavolcanic Shasta red fi r<br />
6 2,040 35 NNE Granite Mountain hemlock, Shasta red fi r<br />
15 2,010 10 NE Mica schist Mountain hemloc k<br />
18 2,135 30 NE Granite Mountain hemlock<br />
24 2,040 45 NNE Metavolcanic Mountain hemlock<br />
4 1,920 65 SE Ultrabasic Jeffrey pine, incense-cedar ,<br />
western white pin e<br />
5 1,710 65 SE Ultrabasic Jeffrey pine, incense-ceda r<br />
25 1,740 5 SE Ultrabasic Jeffrey pine, white fir,<br />
incense-cedar, Douglas-fi r<br />
20 760 70 NNW Mica schist Douglas-fir, Pacific ye w<br />
23 1,400 10 N Granite Engelmann spruce, Douglas-fir ,<br />
white fi r<br />
10 1,740 55 N Metavolcanic Brewer spruce, Shasta red fir,<br />
mountain hemlock<br />
8 3
Cleary and Waring 1969, Reed 1971, Emmingham<br />
1971, Waring and Youngberg 1972) .<br />
In this article we will restrict discussion to<br />
interpretation of results, concentrating upo n<br />
the operational effects of water, temperature ,<br />
and soil fertility . Mechanical stress from sno w<br />
creep or ice storms was important as was win d<br />
(Tranquillini 1970), but such adverse mechanical<br />
forces are closely associated wit h<br />
temperature gradient. Light, too, was important<br />
in understanding succession an d<br />
accounted for more than 75 percent of th e<br />
variation in terminal elongation of Abies<br />
when other environmental factors were<br />
restricted to narrow ranges (Emmingham<br />
1971) . In our stands, which were mature<br />
forests, maximum height of mature trees wa s<br />
used as an index to productivity . In such a<br />
situation, earlier reductions in growth due to<br />
shading or mechanical damage could be ignored<br />
.<br />
Measurement and Interpretation of<br />
Plant Water Stress<br />
During the growing season, plant moistur e<br />
stress measured by the Scholander pressur e<br />
chamber (Scholander et al . 1965, Waring an d<br />
Cleary 1967, Boyer 1967) provided a goo d<br />
estimate of plant water potential (Waggone r<br />
and Turner 1971) . We took measurements a t<br />
monthly intervals, with more frequenc y<br />
during September when the vegetation wa s<br />
under the greatest stress .<br />
Plant moisure stress usually increases fro m<br />
a predawn minimum to some maximum leve l<br />
in the afternoon . Predawn stress represent s<br />
the nearest equilibrium between soil and plant<br />
water potential . Not only the diurnal patter n<br />
but also the seasonal changes in plant wate r<br />
stress are important . The first reflects an imbalance<br />
between transpiration and water<br />
uptake ; the latter can be related to the avail -<br />
ability of soil water over a season . In figure 3 ,<br />
three contrasting forest types are shown t o<br />
have different seasonal water stress curves .<br />
The type dominated by Engelmann spruce<br />
(Picea engelmannii) was restricted to mois t<br />
sites, while oak (Quercus kelloggii) grew<br />
where stress was sufficient to bring about<br />
cessation of cambial activity in the reference<br />
Figure 3. Seasonal changes in minimum plant moisture<br />
stress associated with different forest ecosystems<br />
(Waring 19701 . All data are from 1- t o<br />
2-m-tall Douglas-fir. For this particular set of data ,<br />
the end of season Plant Moisture Stress Inde x<br />
would be 30 for the Oak Type, 18 for the Pin e<br />
Type, and 7 for the Spruce Type .<br />
plants. Where no rainfall occurs during the<br />
summer, the minimum night moisture stres s<br />
at the end of the growing season is an index<br />
to the plant moisture conditions throughout<br />
the entire season . From figure 3, we see the<br />
oak type had a plant moisture stress index o f<br />
30 ; the pine, an index of around 18 ; and the<br />
spruce, 7 atmospheres . Where summer precipitation<br />
is important, a mathematical description<br />
of the seasonal trend is desirable (Ree d<br />
1971) . Winter drought due to cold or frozen<br />
soils should also be similarly evaluated .<br />
Measurement and Interpretatio n<br />
of Temperatur e<br />
At each of the 25 forest stands, air temperature<br />
and soil temperature were recorded<br />
on 30-day thermographs because both root<br />
and shoot temperatures are important . At the<br />
time, we did not have photosyntheti c<br />
response information to help interpret th e<br />
effect of various combinations of temperatur e<br />
and light. Because winter temperatures are<br />
often below freezing, winter photosyntheti c<br />
activity is probably less in the study regio n<br />
than in the milder climate along the Pacifi c<br />
84
coast. Without the benefit of good photo -<br />
synthetic data, we used laboratory studie s<br />
conducted by our colleague, D . P. Lavender .<br />
Lavender found that the dry weight increas e<br />
of Douglas-fir seedlings was closely related to<br />
both air and soil temperatures . With these<br />
data a temperature-plant index was develope d<br />
by summing the potential growth possible for<br />
each day during the growing season (Cleary<br />
and Waring 1969) . Other variables were<br />
assumed nonlimiting. In the field, the Temperature<br />
Growth Index ranged from 30 near<br />
timberline to nearly 100 on oak and pin e<br />
forests. Douglas-fir was not found where th e<br />
index was below 40 .<br />
To visualize this information more effectively,<br />
the distributions of selected conifer s<br />
are presented in relation to these two rathe r<br />
simple plant response indices (fig. 4). The distributional<br />
patterns closely reflect the adapta -<br />
I . I . I I<br />
10 20 30<br />
PLANT MOISTURE STRESS, ATM .<br />
Figure 4 . Distribution of natural regeneration in relation<br />
to gradients of moisture and temperature de -<br />
fined by plant response indices (Waring 1970) .<br />
Validation stands, symbolized by 0, had vegetation<br />
predicted by the intercept of their plant<br />
response indices .<br />
tion of the various conifers . In a local region ,<br />
the variation in distribution of different<br />
species provides a means of predicting the environment<br />
through association with measurements<br />
taken on reference plants . The plan t<br />
response indices were correctly predicte d<br />
from knowledge of plant distributions fo r<br />
three validation stands, indicated as divide d<br />
circles in figure 4 . It is significant that suc h<br />
predictions are possible without physiological<br />
observations on species other than the reference<br />
plants and without special attention t o<br />
events controlling establishment . Once such<br />
relationships are established, the vegetatio n<br />
can provide understanding of the operational<br />
environment without requiring additional<br />
measurements of any kind . We shall expand<br />
this idea later .<br />
Measurement and Interpretation of<br />
Stomatal Respons e<br />
Conifer stomata are most difficult to observe,<br />
usually being sunken and occluded b y<br />
wax . The resistance which they offer to th e<br />
transfer of water vapor from the interior of<br />
the needles can be assessed by determinin g<br />
the rate of water vapor movement with a<br />
diffusion porometer (Waggoner and Turne r<br />
1971). The aperture of stomata may be estimated<br />
by observing the pressure necessary t o<br />
force a 50-percent ethanol solution through<br />
the pores (Fry and Walker 1967). Th e<br />
diffusion resistance is then determined by<br />
calibrating these pressures with reduction i n<br />
transpiration under known vapor pressure<br />
gradients (Reed 1971) . The latter procedure<br />
was followed in our past fieldwork . We found<br />
that stomatal resistance increased as the soi l<br />
moisture became less available during th e<br />
growing season . Further increase in stomatal<br />
resistance was possible during the day i f<br />
evaporative stress was high . These relationships<br />
were quantified and developed into a<br />
simulation model by Reed (1971) . Wit h<br />
knowledge of temperature, humidity, and<br />
nocturnal plant water stress, the model predicted<br />
on a daily basis, both potential transpiration<br />
(PT) and transpiration (T) wit h<br />
stomatal control . These values were summed<br />
for the entire season and confirmed the obser -<br />
85
vation that species such as Brewer spruc e<br />
(Picea breweriana), Port-Orford-cedar<br />
(Chamaecyparis lawsoniana), vine maple<br />
(Ater circinatum), and rhododendron<br />
(Rhododendron macrophyllum) are restricte d<br />
to areas with low potential transpiration . Th e<br />
most valuable index, however, was the rati o<br />
of actual to potential transpiration (T/PT)<br />
Which integrates for water, the demand, th e<br />
supply, and the control b the plant . Where<br />
sot moisture was never inadequate and th e<br />
evaporative stress remained low, the ratio wa s<br />
1 .0. Where water became limiting and hig h<br />
evaporative stress was common, ratios of 0 . 3<br />
were calculated . Under these conditions, both<br />
forest composition and growth were dramatically<br />
affected .<br />
Measurement and Interpretation of Soi l<br />
Fertility and Plant Nutritio n<br />
Soil profiles from each stand were reconstructed<br />
to a depth of 60 cm and taken into<br />
controlled environment chambers where seedlings<br />
of Douglas-fir and Shasta red fir were<br />
grown for a period of 5 months (Waring an d<br />
Youngberg 1972) . The dry weight yields at<br />
the end of the experiment were used as a bio -<br />
assay of soil fertility, representing the supply<br />
of nutrients available to conifers . Foliar analyses<br />
were made on reference trees, first durin g<br />
the time of maximum demand when ne w<br />
foliage was being produced and again after al l<br />
shoot and diameter growth had ceased in th e<br />
fall. In the first period, 1-year-old foliage wa s<br />
assessed because it represents a major sourc e<br />
of mobile nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium.<br />
Three categories of nutrient availability<br />
can be identified : (1) where no nutritional<br />
stress occurs during the year ; (2) where nutrition<br />
is adequate only when shoot and<br />
diameter growth has ceased ; and (3) where<br />
nutrition is inadequate year around (Warin g<br />
and Youngberg 1972) . These three categorie s<br />
may be further refined and are of consider -<br />
able value in reaching decisions concernin g<br />
fertilization. The composition of vegetatio n<br />
is, however, insensitive to this classification of<br />
nutrient availability .<br />
Only on soils where an imbalance of nutrients<br />
or toxic amounts of certain heavy metals<br />
were present did special plant communitie s<br />
develop. In this paper, therefore, we hav e<br />
assigned plants to one of three categories of<br />
tolerance to infertile soils developed from<br />
ultrabasic parent materials : In class 1 ar e<br />
those which are tolerant ; class 2 is made up of<br />
those species that are intolerant ; and in class 3<br />
are those plants both tolerant and competitively<br />
restricted to ultrabasic soils .<br />
Vegetation as an Index to Environmen t<br />
Can we use plants to define their environment,<br />
or more precisely, the environment expressed<br />
through reference plants? To test thi s<br />
idea, we selected 47 species from more than<br />
600 in the local flora and recorded thei r<br />
distributional limits in relation to various<br />
environmental plant indices (table 2) . For<br />
some plants we knew only the approximat e<br />
ranges and occasionally we had insufficien t<br />
data to set particular index limits .<br />
In forest ecosystems where plant composition<br />
is known, the range of environmenta l<br />
indices may be predicted from information i n<br />
table 2 . In table 3, the plant response indice s<br />
were thus predicted for the 25 stand s<br />
described in table 1 . Therefore for the blac k<br />
oak forest, stand 3, where Rhus diversiloba ,<br />
Arbutus menziesii, Lonicera hispidula, and<br />
Quercus chrysolepis grew, one can assess fro m<br />
table 2 that the Temperature Growth Inde x<br />
lies between 98 and 96, the Plant Moistur e<br />
Stress Index at 25 .4, and the ratio of transpiration<br />
to potential transpiration as 0 .29 .<br />
Plants that were exclusively adapted t o<br />
ultrabasic soils, such as Jeffrey pine, isolated<br />
those ecosystems (stands 4, 5, and 25) . Those<br />
forests with oak (stands 3, 8, and 21 )<br />
exhibited the greatest water stress, th e<br />
warmest environments, and the greatest control<br />
of transpiration . At the other extreme ,<br />
mountain hemlock forests (stands 6, 18, 15 ,<br />
and 24) had the coolest environments and<br />
lowest potential transpiration .<br />
In figure 5, the midpoint of the predicted<br />
Temperature Growth Index from table 3 is<br />
plotted against the Temperature Growt h<br />
Index calculated from temperature records .<br />
The regression has an r2 of 0 .93, and is highl y<br />
86
Generic name<br />
Table 2.-Ecological distribution of selected species in relation t o<br />
plant response indices'<br />
PT , PT , T/PT , T/PT , PMS , PMS , TGI, TGI, Soil<br />
maxi- mini - maxi- mini- maxi- mini- maxi- mini- tolermum<br />
mum mum mum mum mum mum mum anc e<br />
ANACARDIACEAE<br />
Rhus diversiloba 30.0 17 .7 0 .42 0 .29 25 .4 20 .3 100 80 1<br />
BERBERIDACEA E<br />
Achlys triphylla 16.8 1 .00 .57 16 .2 80 60 2<br />
CAPRIFOLIACEAE<br />
Lonicera hispidula<br />
COMPOSITA E<br />
30.0 17 .7 .29 30.0 25 .4 100 95 1<br />
Arnica latifolia 13.5 7 .5 1 .00 .46 19 .1 5 .2 75 35 2<br />
CUPRESSACEA E<br />
Libocedrus decurrens<br />
ERICACEAE<br />
19.5 12.2 1 .00 .40 30 .0 5 .2 85 52 1<br />
Arbutus menziesii 30.0 - 1 .00 .29 30 .0 5 .2 98 68 1<br />
Arctostaphylos uiscida 30.0 17 .7 .42 .29 25 .4 20 .3 100 90 1<br />
Rhododendron macrophyllum 12.5 - 1 .00 .57 16 .2 - 100 2<br />
Vaccinium membranaceum 12.5 .63 .46 19 .1 12 .8 60 45 2<br />
Vaccinium scoparium 10.3 1 .00 .46 19 .1 - 50 2<br />
FAGACEA E<br />
Castanopsis chrysophylla 19.5 - 1.00 .51 15 .3 - 85 40 1<br />
Quercus chrysolepis 30.0 12 .0 1.00 .63 30 .0 8 .0 100 78 1<br />
Quercus kelloggii 30.0 17 .6 .42 .29 30 .0 15 .0 98 80 1<br />
Quercus sdeeriana 16.8 - 1 .00 .46 19 .1 - 70 50 1<br />
Quercus uaccinifolia 30.0 .40 - 30.0 100 - 1<br />
GARRYACEA E<br />
Garrya fremontii 30.0 12 .7 .62 .40 30 .0 12 .6 70 50 1<br />
LABIATA E<br />
Monardella odoratissima 21 .4 .62 .40 20 .3 12 .6 100 35 1<br />
LEG UMIN OS A E<br />
Lathyrus polyphyllus 13.1 - 1 .00 .63 12 .8 5 .2 85 45 2<br />
Lupinus leucophyllus 30.0 12 .7 .86 - 30.0 8 .4 70 50 3<br />
LILIACEAE<br />
Clintonia uniflora 13 .1 7 .5 1.00 .51 16 .2 5 .2 85 35 2<br />
Disporum hooheri 16 .8 12 .2 1.00 .51 16 .2 5 .2 85 45 2<br />
Xerophylium tenax 19 .5 - 1 .00 .40 19 .1 8 .4 80 40 1<br />
PINACEA E<br />
Abies concolor 19.5 - 1 .00 .46 19 .1 5 .2 84 47 1<br />
Abies magnifica 12.5 7 .5 1 .00 .46 19 .1 5 .2 59 34 2<br />
var . shastensis<br />
Picea breweriana 10.3 1 .00 .46 19 .1 52 1<br />
Picea engelmannii 11 .0 - 1.00 .63 12 .8 - 47 - 2<br />
Pinus jeffreyi 25.0 12 .7 .61 - 25 .0 8 .4 100 52 3<br />
Pinus lambertiana 21 .4 11 .0 1 .00 .29 25 .4 5 .2 96 45 1<br />
Pin us ponderosa 21 .4 13 .5 1 .00 .29 25 .4 5 .2 98 68 2<br />
Pinus monticola 19.5 7 .8 1 .00 .46 19 .1 5 .2 70 44 1<br />
Pseudotsuga menziesii 21 .4 - 1 .00 .29 25 .4 5 .2 98 47 1<br />
Tsuga mertensiana 11 .0 7 .5 1 .00 .46 19 .1 5 .2 59 34 2<br />
POLEM<strong>ON</strong>IACEA E<br />
Phlox adsurgens 16.8 10 .3 1.00 .46 19 .1 5 .2 85 52 2<br />
Polemonium californicum 7 .8 - 1 .00 .98 5 .2 - 50 30 2<br />
POLYG<strong>ON</strong>ACEAE<br />
Polygonum dauisiae 7 .8 1 .00 .98 5 .2 40 30 2<br />
POLYPODIACEAE<br />
Onychium densum<br />
RANUNCULACEAE<br />
30.0 12 .7 .62 18 .1 5 .2 80 50 3<br />
Anemone deltoidea 19 .5 7 .8 1 .00 .51 19 .1 5 .2 85 45 1<br />
Anemone lyallii 19 .5 7 .8 1 .00 .51 15 .3 5 .2 75 45 2<br />
ROSACEAE<br />
Amelanchier pallida 16.8 .62 .46 19 .1 75 50 1<br />
Rubus lasiococcus 12.5 1 .00 .46 19 .1 - 60 - 2<br />
Rubus paruiflorus<br />
SAXIFRAGACEA E<br />
16 .8 1 .00 .51 16 .2 5 .2 85 50 2<br />
Ribes viscosissimum 13 .1 7 .8 1 .00 .51 16 .2 5 .2 85 40 2<br />
Tiarella unifoliata 13 .1 - 1 .00 .63 12 .0 - 85 47 2<br />
SCROPHULARIACEAE<br />
Pedicularis racemosa<br />
VALERIANACEAE<br />
12.5 7 .5 1 .00 .51 16 .2 5 .2 65 35 2<br />
Valeriana sitchensis<br />
VIOLACEA E<br />
7 .8 1 .00 .98 5 .2 45 30 2<br />
Viola glabella<br />
Viola sempereirens<br />
13 .1<br />
13 .1<br />
7 .5<br />
-<br />
1 .00<br />
1 .00<br />
.63<br />
.57<br />
12 .8<br />
16 .2<br />
5 .2<br />
5 .2<br />
95<br />
85<br />
35<br />
45<br />
2<br />
2<br />
'<br />
P otential transpiration (PT) is calculated for April through September based on a minimum stomatal resistance of 4 se c<br />
cm Transpiration is expressed in g cm - 2<br />
The ratio of simulated transpiration (T) to potential (PT) reflects the degree of stomatal control exhibited by a referenc e<br />
conifer.<br />
Plant Moisture Stress (PMS) is expressed in atm and represents predawn measurements on reference conifers near the end<br />
of the summer dry season (Sept .) .<br />
A Temperature Growth Index (TGI) reflects the potential for Douglas-fir seedling growth as a function of air and soil<br />
t emp erature for the entire growing season.<br />
The soil tolerance index indicates whether the species is exclusively restricted (class 3), tolerant (class 1), or excluded (class<br />
2) from infertile ultrabasic soils .<br />
Values of 30 in PT and PMS columns indicate species are known to occupy environments more extreme than possible fo r<br />
coniferous forest .<br />
8 7
Table 3.-Predicted plant response indices for 25 forest ecosystems based on th e<br />
inclusive limits of species present with known ecological distributions '<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> type 2<br />
Stand<br />
PT , PT, T/PT , T/PT , PMS , PMS, TGI , TGI , Soi l<br />
maxi - mini- maxi - mini- maxi - mini- maxi- mini - tolermum<br />
mum mum mum mum mum mum mum anc e<br />
Black oak 3 21 .4 17 .7 0 .29 0 .29 25 .4 25 .4 98 95 1<br />
Black oak 21 3 21 .4 17 .7 .29 .29 25 .4 25 .4 96 95 1<br />
Ponderosa pine 8 21 .4 17 .7 .42 .40 20 .3 20 .3 96 90 1<br />
Ponderosa pine 12 3 16 .8 13 .5 .62 .46 19 .1 12 .6 70 68 1<br />
Mixed conifer 1 13 .5 13 .5 .62 .51 15 .3 5 .2 75 68 2<br />
Mixed conifer 11 16 .8 13 .5 1 .00 .57 15 .3 5 .2 70 68 1<br />
Mixed conifer 13 13 .1 12 .2 1 .00 .63 12 .8 8 .4 80 68 1<br />
Mixed conifer 19 13 .1 12 .2 1 .00 .63 12 .8 5 .2 84 68 2<br />
White fir 2 12 .5 12 .2 .62 .51 15 .3 12 .6 65 50 1<br />
White fir 9 12 .5 12 .2 .63 .57 16 .2 12 .8 59 60 2<br />
White fir 14 3 13 .1 11 .0 1 .00 .63 12 .8 8 .4 70 52 2<br />
White fir 22 3 13 .1 10 .3 .62 .63 12 .8 5 .2 70 52 2<br />
Shasta red fir 7 3 7 .8 7 .8 1 .00 .98 5 .2 5 .2 45 45 2<br />
Shasta red fir 16 12.5 7 .5 1 .00 .51 15 .3 5 .2 59 40 1<br />
Shasta red fir 17 7 .8 7 .8 1 .00 .98 5 .2 5 .2 45 45 2<br />
Mountain hemlock 6 7 .8 7 .5 1 .00 .98 5 .2 5 .2 45 35 2<br />
Mountain hemlock 15 3 11 .0 7 .5 1 .00 .46 19 .1 5 .2 59 34 2<br />
Mountain hemlock 18 3 7 .8 7 .5 .62 .46 19 .1 12 .6 40 35 2<br />
Mountain hemlock 24 3 7 .8 7 .8 1 .00 .98 5 .2 5 .2 45 44 2<br />
Jeffrey pine 4 16 .8 12 .7 .61 .51 15 .3 12 .6 70 52 3<br />
Jeffrey pine 5 19 .5 12 .7 .40 .40 18 .1 12 .6 70 52 3<br />
Jeffrey pine 25 3 19.5 12 .7 .61 .51 15 .3 8 .4 70 52 3<br />
Yew 20 3 17 .7 16 .8 .51 .42 16 .2 15 .0 85 80 2<br />
Engelmann spruce 23 11 .0 11 .0 .63 .63 12 .8 12 .8 47 47 2<br />
Brewer spruce 10 10.3 7 .8 .62 .46 19 .1 12 .8 50 50 2<br />
' Potential transpiration (PT) is calculated for April through September based on a minimum stomatal resistance of 4 sec<br />
cm^1 . Transpiration expressed in cm- 2<br />
The ratio or simulated transpiration (T) to potential (PT) reflects the degree of stomata] control exhibited by a referenc e<br />
conifer.<br />
Plant Moisture Stress (PMS) is expressed in atm and represents predawn measurements on reference conifers near the en d<br />
of the summer dry season (Sept .) .<br />
A Temperature Growth Index (TGI) reflects the potential for Douglas-fir seedling growth as a function of air and soil<br />
temperature for the entire growing season .<br />
The soil tolerance index indicates whether the species is exclusively restricted (class 3), tolerant (class 1), or excluded (clas s<br />
2) from infertile ultrabasic soils .<br />
2 From R . H . Waring, <strong>Forest</strong> plants of the eastern Siskiyous : their environmental and vegetational distribution. Northwes t<br />
Sci . 43 : 1-17, 1969 .<br />
'Simulation of PT and T/PT was not possible because of inadequate data . The predicted values appear reasonable whe n<br />
compared with other stands with similar vegetation, temperature, and plant moisture stress indices .<br />
88
x<br />
-0 o 90<br />
LL<br />
L<br />
70<br />
L<br />
a)<br />
a<br />
E<br />
50<br />
a )<br />
t<br />
-o a )<br />
L<br />
a- 30<br />
30 50 70 90<br />
Observed Temperature Growth Inde x<br />
Figure 5 . Relationship between the temperature index<br />
derived from the growth response of Douglas -<br />
fir to temperature and the midpoint values predicted<br />
from the presence of indicator species in a<br />
given ecosystem (table 3) . Validation stands, 0 ,<br />
with one exception fell within the 95-percent<br />
confidence limits . r2 = 0.93 .<br />
30<br />
significant . Similarly, figure 6 presents the regression<br />
for plant moisture stress where the r 2<br />
was 0.77, also highly significant. The symbol<br />
8 represents validation stands which generall y<br />
fell within the 95-percent confidence intervals<br />
.<br />
From the comparisons made earlier, we<br />
showed that environmental plant indices ca n<br />
predict the forest composition, and conversely<br />
from the above relationships, we not e<br />
that environmental indices may be predicted<br />
from knowledge of the distribution of specifi c<br />
plants .<br />
Environmental Plant Indices as Predictor s<br />
of <strong>Forest</strong> Productivity<br />
In this study the only index to productivit y<br />
was maximum tree height . Particularly on th e<br />
infertile ultrabasic soils, this index overestimates<br />
productivity, for although individua l<br />
trees reach considerable height, the density o f<br />
trees remains low. Reed and Waring l reporte d<br />
that the ratio of actual to potential transpiration<br />
(T/PT) combined with the Temperatur e<br />
Growth Index (TGI) accounted for 96 per -<br />
cent of the variation observed in the maxi -<br />
mum height of Douglas-fir . For all dominant<br />
trees, these and related indices accounted fo r<br />
86 percent of the variation in height . The<br />
model for analytic solution is :<br />
Maximum height (in meters) =<br />
- 102.3 + 0.334 PT + 316.4 T/PT + 0.405 TGI<br />
- 186.8 (T/PT) 2 - 3.25 (T/PT)PT + 0.631 (T/PT)TGI<br />
This is encouraging, considering the limited<br />
sampling of tree heights and the expecte d<br />
differences among species . The model was not<br />
improved by including the index to soil fertility,<br />
again suggesting that total height may<br />
be an inadequate measure of productivity .<br />
Figure 6. Relationship between the moisture stress<br />
index during the period when soil water may b e<br />
limiting to reference conifers and the midpoin t<br />
values predicted from the presence of indicato r<br />
species in a given ecosystem (table 3) . Validation<br />
stands, 0, fell within the 95-percent confidence<br />
limits . r2 = 0.77 .<br />
30<br />
Data Requirement s<br />
If the environmental grid is to be applie d<br />
across the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome, then a<br />
coordinated effort must be made to test an d<br />
improve the approach . Present efforts by<br />
1 Unpublished data .<br />
89
Walker, Reed, Scott, and Webb are channele d<br />
toward providing additional physiological<br />
information on Douglas-fir, one of four pro -<br />
posed reference plants . These investigators are<br />
concerned with photosynthesis, water uptake ,<br />
transpiration, and translocation . Lavender an d<br />
Hermann are responsible for providing functional<br />
relationships between foliage, stem, an d<br />
roots. Through stem and twig analysis and b y<br />
aging foliage, we hope to gain measures of net<br />
primary production .<br />
Other reference plants include Pinus<br />
ponderosa, Tsuga heterophylla, and Abies<br />
lasiocarpa ; additional studies on these specie s<br />
are necessary .<br />
To extend and validate the genera l<br />
approach described in this paper, we will re -<br />
quire certain kinds of information at selecte d<br />
forest environments across the Biome . <strong>Forest</strong><br />
stands will be selected which represent equilibrium<br />
stages ; i.e., approach the maximu m<br />
accumulation of biomass, on homogeneou s<br />
areas at least 30 m 2 .<br />
Within these stands, bud break will b e<br />
recorded on 1- to 2-m reference conifers b y<br />
observing five lateral branches on each of a t<br />
least five trees. Cambial activity will b e<br />
assessed by using the pin-into-cambium technique<br />
which identifies the termination of cel l<br />
divisions (Wolter 1968) . Stand compositio n<br />
and structure will be estimated from basa l<br />
area and height estimates of trees and under -<br />
story sampling of shrub and herbaceous cover .<br />
Nocturnal moisture stress will be measure d<br />
on three to five reference trees at 2-week intervals<br />
throughout the growing season and at<br />
less frequent intervals during the dorman t<br />
season, unless winter dessication is likely .<br />
Temperature under the stand near referenc e<br />
trees will be recorded at 1 m above and 20 c m<br />
below ground level. Latitude location o f<br />
stands will allow for calculation of day length<br />
for different seasons . Nutrition will b e<br />
assessed from a composite sample of 1-yearold<br />
foliage collected from the lateral branches<br />
of at least five trees at the time of new shoot<br />
elongation and during the late fall .<br />
Short wave radiation will be measured in a<br />
nearby open area or above the stand. Data<br />
will be expressed in cal cm -2 day -1 . Absolut e<br />
humidity will be measured daily at solar noon<br />
during the growing season and if possible continuously<br />
year around. Precipitation will include<br />
both monthly values and average maxi -<br />
mum snow depth . Estimates of wind velocity<br />
are desired where conditions appear to warrant<br />
measurements .<br />
These data will not only be valuable to hel p<br />
construct the environmental grid but wil l<br />
serve to interpret process studies in decomposition,<br />
consumer population dynamics, and<br />
other ecosystem properties .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
All field investigations reported in thi s<br />
paper were generously funded under an extended<br />
McIntire-Stennis Federal Grant . Th e<br />
simulation of transpiration, regression equations<br />
for productivity, and a computer program<br />
for defining plant response indices o n<br />
the basis of overlapping plant distribution s<br />
were developed under support by Nationa l<br />
Science Foundation Grant No . GB-20963 t o<br />
the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome, U .S. Analysis o f<br />
Ecosystems, International Biological Program .<br />
This is Contribution No . 26 from the Coniferous<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Biome .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Atzet, T., and R. H . Waring. 1970. Selectiv e<br />
filtering of light by coniferous forests an d<br />
minimum light energy requirements fo r<br />
regeneration . Can. J. Bot. 48 : 2163-2167 .<br />
Azzi, G . 1955. Agricultural ecology . 424 p.<br />
London : Constable and Co .<br />
Bakuzis, E. V. 1961 . Synecological coordinates<br />
and investigations of forest ecosystems<br />
. 13th Congr. Int. Union For. Res .<br />
Org. (Vienna) Proc . 2, Sec . 21½ .<br />
Boyer, J . S . 1967 . Leaf water potentials measured<br />
with a pressure chamber. Plant<br />
Physiol. 42: 133-137 .<br />
Cleary, B . D., and R. H. Waring. 1969. Temperature<br />
: collection of data and its analysis<br />
for the interpretation of plant growth an d<br />
distribution . Can . J. Bot . 47 : 167-173 .<br />
Daubenmire, R . 1952. <strong>Forest</strong> vegetation of<br />
northern Idaho and adjacent Washington ,<br />
90
and its bearing on concepts of vegetatio n<br />
classification . Ecol . Monogr . 22 : 301-330 .<br />
E l lenberg, H. 1950. Landwirtschaftliche<br />
Pflanzensoziologie . Bd . I . Unkrautgemeinschaften<br />
als Zeiger fur Klima and<br />
Boden . 141 p . Ulmer, Stuttgart .<br />
1956 . Aufgaben and Methoden<br />
der Vegetationskunde . In H . Walter (ed .) ,<br />
Einfuhrung in die Phytologie. Bd. IV .<br />
Grundlagen der Vegetationsgliederung . Tel<br />
1 . 136 p . Ulmer, Stuttgart .<br />
Emmingham, W . H . 1971 . Conifer growth and<br />
plant distribution under different light environments<br />
in the Siskiyou Mountains of<br />
southwestern Oregon . 50 p. M .S. thesis, on<br />
file at Oreg . State Univ ., Corvallis .<br />
Franklin, J. F., and C. T. Dymess. 1969 .<br />
Vegetation of Oregon and Washington .<br />
USDA <strong>Forest</strong> Serv . Res . Pap . PNW-80, 21 6<br />
p., illus. Pac. Northwest <strong>Forest</strong> & Range<br />
Exp . Stn., Portland, Oreg .<br />
Fry, K. E., and R . B . Walker. 1967 . A pressure<br />
infiltration method for estimatin g<br />
stomatal opening in conifers . Ecology 48 :<br />
155-157 .<br />
Hills, G. A. 1959. A ready reference to th e<br />
description of the land of Ontario and it s<br />
productivity. 142 p. Ont . Dep. Lands &<br />
<strong>Forest</strong>s .<br />
Krajina, V . J. 1965. Biogeoclimatic zones and<br />
classification of British Columbia . In V . J .<br />
Krajina (ed .), Ecology of western North<br />
America, vol . 1, p. 1-17 . Univ . Brit . Columbia,<br />
Vancouver .<br />
Loucks, O. L. 1962. Ordinating forest communities<br />
by means of environmental scalars<br />
and p h y t o sociological indices. Ecol .<br />
Monogr . 32 : 137-166 .<br />
Mason, H. L., and J . H. Langenheim . 1957 .<br />
Language analysis and the concept of environment.<br />
Ecology 38 : 325-339 .<br />
Progrebnjak, P . S. 1929 . Uber die Methodik<br />
der Standortsuntersuchungen in Verbindung<br />
mit den Waldtypen. Int. Congr .<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Exp. Stn. (Stockholm) Proc., p .<br />
455-471 .<br />
Reed, K. L. 1971. A computer simulation<br />
model of seasonal transpiration in Douglasfir<br />
based on a model of stomatal resistance .<br />
132 p . Ph .D . thesis, on file at Oreg . State<br />
Univ., Corvallis .<br />
Rowe, J . S . 1956. Use of undergrowth plan t<br />
species in forestry . Ecology 37 : 461-472 .<br />
Scholander, P . F., H . T. Hammel, D . Broad -<br />
street, and E . A. Hemmingsen. 1965. Sap<br />
pressure in vascular plants . Science 148 :<br />
339-346 .<br />
Sukachev, V. N . 1928. Principles of classification<br />
of the spruce communities of European<br />
Russia. J. Ecol . 16 : 1-18 .<br />
Tranquillini, W ., 1970 . Einfluss des Winde s<br />
auf den Gaswechsel der Pflanzen Umsha u<br />
in Wissenschaft and Technik 26: 860-861 .<br />
Waggoner, P . E ., and N. C . Turner . 1971 .<br />
Transpiration and its control by stomata in<br />
a pine forest . Conn. Agric. Exp. Stn . Bull .<br />
726, 87 p. New Haven .<br />
Waring, R. H. 1969 . <strong>Forest</strong> plants of the east -<br />
ern Siskiyous : their environmental and<br />
vegetational distribution. Northwest Sci .<br />
43 : 1-17 .<br />
1970. Matching species to site .<br />
In R. K. Hermann (ed .), Regeneration o f<br />
ponderosa pine, p . 54-61 . Oreg. State<br />
Univ., Corvallis .<br />
and B. D. Cleary . 1967. Plan t<br />
moisture stress : evaluation by pressure<br />
bomb. Science 155 : 1248-1254 .<br />
and J. Major . 1964. Some vegetation<br />
of the California coastal redwoo d<br />
region in relation to gradients of moisture ,<br />
nutrients, light, and temperature . Ecol .<br />
Monogr . 34: 167-215 .<br />
and C. T. Youngberg . 1972 .<br />
Evaluating forest sites for potential growt h<br />
response of trees to fertilizer. Northwest<br />
Sci . 46 : 67-75 .<br />
Warming, E . 1909. Oecology of plants . 422 p.<br />
London : Oxford Univ . Press .<br />
Whittaker, R . H. 1956. Vegetation of th e<br />
Great Smoky Mountains . Ecol. Monogr .<br />
26 : 1-80 .<br />
1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou<br />
Mountains, Oregon and California .<br />
Ecol . Monogr . 30 : 279-338 .<br />
1961 . Vegetation history of th e<br />
Pacific Coast States and the "central" significance<br />
of the Klamath region . Madron o<br />
16 : 5-23 .<br />
Wolter, K . E . 1968. A new method for marking<br />
xylem growth . <strong>Forest</strong> Sci . 14 : 102-104 .<br />
91
Water and Nutrien t<br />
Movement Through Ecosystems<br />
93
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Modeling water movement within<br />
the upper rooting zone of a<br />
Cedar River soil<br />
W. H . Hathewa y<br />
P. Machn o<br />
an d<br />
E . Hamerl y<br />
University of Washingto n<br />
Seattle, Washington 9819 5<br />
Abstract<br />
The Richards equation for unsaturated soil water flow is used to represent flow in a natural forest soil . Th e<br />
differential equation and the corresponding finite difference technique used to obtain an approximate solutio n<br />
are discussed. Independent estimates of soil moisture conductivity and of initial soil water content at severa l<br />
depths are used as inputs to the finite difference equation. Conductivity was estimated by laboratory techniques,<br />
and initial conditions in the field were measured by tensiometer. A tension lysimeter system provided<br />
estimates of soil water flow. Predicted values were compared with values measured in the field . Results sugges t<br />
that the model gives a satisfactory representation of actual soil water flow despite considerable variability in<br />
forest soil properties.<br />
Introduction<br />
In the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome, we hav e<br />
been interested in models which represent th e<br />
movement of water through unsaturated soil s<br />
for use as possible components of a larger<br />
computer model which describes water relations<br />
within a local soil-plant-atmospher e<br />
system. Other components of the larger<br />
model include uptake of water by the roots of<br />
trees, conduction of water through the vascular<br />
system to the leaves, and transpiratio n<br />
from the leaves to the surrounding atmosphere<br />
. When we find that existing submodel s<br />
can be used-possibly with slight modifications-in<br />
our larger soil-plant-atmospher e<br />
model, we prefer to use them rather than t o<br />
invent them anew . Where existing models ar e<br />
not well suited to our objectives, we prefer t o<br />
develop new ones . For example, we are currently<br />
constructing a model which represent s<br />
the flow of water through the vascular syste m<br />
of a tree. We evaluate existing or new sub -<br />
models on the basis of (1) their behavior in<br />
isolation and (2) their compatibility with<br />
other components of the system . In the<br />
present paper we report our experiences with<br />
the Richards equation, a model which de -<br />
scribes the flow of water in an unsaturate d<br />
soil .<br />
The Model<br />
The Richards equation (Richards 1931) is<br />
essentially a modification of the well-known<br />
Darcy relationship for saturated flow i n<br />
porous media. Because the Richards model<br />
allows for variation in hydraulic conductivity<br />
with changes in soil water content, it is wel l<br />
suited for the description of water flow in<br />
unsaturated media . Darcy 's law with variabl e<br />
conductivity and negative hydraulic head can<br />
be written (Rose 1966 )<br />
v=K aia 6 ae aZ<br />
K (1)<br />
95
Here v is the volume of water crossing a uni t<br />
area per unit time (cm/min) ,<br />
K is the hydraulic conductivity (cm/min) ,<br />
is the soil water pressure or suctio n<br />
(hydraulic head) (cm) ,<br />
0 is the soil water content (volume of<br />
water per unit volume of soil), an d<br />
z is the height above datum (referenc e<br />
level) of the point under consideratio n<br />
(cm) .<br />
By introducing the concept of soil-wate r<br />
diffusivity, defined b y<br />
purposes of calculations . Soil moisture specified<br />
as a function of time is required at th e<br />
upper and lower boundaries of the soil column<br />
. Their solution permits the simultaneous<br />
calculation o f<br />
(Dj +<br />
Dj+) )<br />
2 (oJ+1 zj+1 - 01 zj<br />
This expression approximates D a8 and hence<br />
v, the volume flux of water, apart from th e<br />
constant K (cf. equation 2) .<br />
D = -K a alP d ,<br />
where D is measured in c m 2 /min, Childs and<br />
Collis-George (1950) cast the Darcy equatio n<br />
in a form similar to Fick 's law of diffusion :<br />
v = -Da 8 -K (2 )<br />
Applying the equation of continuity ,<br />
ad + av<br />
at az<br />
= 0 (which implies that there are n o<br />
sources or sinks of water in the system), one<br />
obtains the full Richards soil flow equation :<br />
30 __ a ad aK<br />
at az (D az ) + a z<br />
(3 )<br />
Soil moisture is obtained as a function o f<br />
depth (z) and time (t) by integrating (3) .<br />
Accordingly the Richards model is compatibl e<br />
with our larger soil-plant-atmosphere model ,<br />
which requires soil moisture at various depth s<br />
and times as an input to a submodel whic h<br />
represents the uptake of water by the roots o f<br />
a tree. Our current uptake model is that of<br />
Gardner (1960), a diffusion-type flow equation<br />
in which time rate of change of soil wate r<br />
concentration (0) at any point (z) in the soi l<br />
is related to the moisture gradient betwee n<br />
that point and an absorbing root .<br />
Since D and K depend on 0, (3) is non -<br />
linear in 0, and a solution is possible only i f<br />
numerical approximations are used . Remso n<br />
et al . (1965) developed a computer program<br />
which gives approximate results when initial<br />
moisture content is specified at each of n+ 1<br />
equally spaced points or nodes into which a<br />
soil column zn centimeters thick is divided for<br />
Available<br />
Observational Data<br />
At the Allan Thompson Research Center ,<br />
Cedar River Watershed, the downward flow o f<br />
water through soil profiles has been measure d<br />
for several years by a tension lysimeter syste m<br />
(Gessel and Cole 1965) . A prescribed suctio n<br />
on the porous lysimeter plate causes drainage<br />
through the plate to approximate the drainag e<br />
in the adjacent soil . Results are recorded i n<br />
permanent form on paper tape by an automatic<br />
data recording system . Our data com e<br />
from a series of controlled experiments, carried<br />
out in 1970, which were designed t o<br />
study the effects of rainfall on wetting front s<br />
in the rooting zone of a Douglas-fir stand .<br />
Lysimeter plates were installed at depths o f<br />
11 and 25 cm and rainfall was simulated by a<br />
below-canopy sprinkler system . Soil moisture<br />
was measured by tensiometer at a point mid -<br />
way between the soil surface and the uppe r<br />
lysimeter plate, and water flux through th e<br />
lysimeter was recorded by a flow meter connected<br />
to the data recorder .<br />
For the present study only the data for th e<br />
11-cm plate were used. Since an abrup t<br />
change in the physical characteristics of th e<br />
soil occurs between the 11- and 25-cm levels ,<br />
a different set of estimates of the conductivity<br />
and diffusivity parameters is require d<br />
for the lower layer . A model coupling th e<br />
flow of water through the two layers has bee n<br />
developed but has not yet been tested .<br />
96
Parameter Estimation<br />
In order to estimate conductivity (K) and<br />
diffusivity (D), both of which are functions of<br />
soil water content (0), we used standar d<br />
laboratory and computational procedures<br />
(Richards 1948, Green and Corey 1971) . The<br />
so-called moisture release curve, a plot of ,1i<br />
against 0, was also obtained in the laboratory .<br />
Curves for K, D, and as functions of 0 are<br />
shown in figure 1 .<br />
Our Cedar River core samples of the<br />
Everett gravelly sandy loam were biased to an<br />
unknown degree by the removal of the large<br />
stone fraction before the laboratory analysis .<br />
These stones constitute perhaps up to 20 per -<br />
cent of the volume of the Everett soil series .<br />
Because these stones tend to impede the flo w<br />
of water in unsaturated soils-the path aroun d<br />
them is longer than it would be for smaller<br />
obstructions-we believe our estimates of K<br />
may be somewhat too large . This decrease in<br />
conductivity associated with the presence o f<br />
large stones is especially noteworthy if th e<br />
soil is highly unsaturated because water<br />
strongly held by matric forces flows only<br />
along capillary paths around the stones an d<br />
not directly through the interstices of aggregations<br />
of large stones and cobbles .<br />
Since conductivity of water in unsaturate d<br />
soils is extremely difficult to measure directly,<br />
it has become common practice to estimate<br />
this parameter from pore-size distribution<br />
data, or equivalently, from the soil<br />
moisture release curve. Green and Corey<br />
(1971) have reviewed three methods fo r<br />
calculating K based on pore-size distribution<br />
and found that all give good results whe n<br />
compared with measured data . Our curve for<br />
K as a function of 0 is based on laboratory<br />
measurements of K for the saturated Everett<br />
soil and adjusted for unsaturated soils by us e<br />
of the Marshall pore-interaction relationship<br />
with a matching factor (Marshall 1958) .<br />
The shape of the moisture release curve i s<br />
also affected by sampling procedures. Removal<br />
of large stones clearly biases the result s<br />
in the direction of a soil with smaller pores .<br />
Accordingly, the correct relationship is some -<br />
what to the left of the one determined in the<br />
laboratory . This implies that the slope aO i s<br />
different from that indicated by our laboratory<br />
data and that our estimate of the dif -<br />
fusivity D = -K is biased .<br />
ao<br />
Computational Procedures<br />
We used the Remson computer program ,<br />
which provides an approximation to the solution<br />
of (3). As we have already noted, it is<br />
possible to calculate at the same time a n<br />
approximation to the volume flux of water ,<br />
v = -D ae, at any depth in the soil. For thi s<br />
calculation initial moisture content must b e<br />
specified at a number of equally space d<br />
points, called nodes, along the vertical soil<br />
profile. Our nodes were set at depths of 1, 3 ,<br />
5, 7, 9, and 11 cm. Initial moisture content<br />
was measured at approximately 5 .5 cm by<br />
tensiometer. The lysimeter plate at 11 cm<br />
depth provided another point of known<br />
moisture content . Because suction at the<br />
lysimeter plate was maintained at a constant<br />
level, the moisture content at that point coul d<br />
be obtained directly from the empirically<br />
determined moisture release curve. Estimate s<br />
of initial values at other nodes were obtaine d<br />
by linear extrapolation . Moisture content at<br />
the upper boundary (the soil surface) varie d<br />
with incoming precipitation .<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
Observed flow of water through the lysimeter<br />
plate is compared to that predicted by<br />
the flow equation in figures 2, 3, and 4 which<br />
summarize the outcomes of three field experiments,<br />
and the corresponding computer runs .<br />
The results follow a consistent pattern . Predicted<br />
and observed flows begin, peak, an d<br />
subside at about the same time . Maximu m<br />
predicted flow is about 25 percent greate r<br />
than observed. At lower levels of flow th e<br />
correspondence is closer .<br />
We conclude that the Richards flow equa -<br />
97
2<br />
10 7100 .160 .220 .280 .340 .400 .460 .520 .580 •640 -70 0<br />
2<br />
10 100 .160 .220 .280 .340 .400 .460 .520 .580 .640 .700<br />
100 0<br />
90 0<br />
t.u<br />
I- 60 0<br />
70 0<br />
0 60 0<br />
50 0<br />
U<br />
40 0<br />
30 0<br />
0 20 0<br />
100<br />
0<br />
-10 IQQ .200 .300 400 .500 .600 .70 0<br />
WATER FILLED POROSITY - THETA . (CU . CM . WATER)/(CU . CM . SOIL )<br />
Figure 1 . Soil water diffusivity (top), conductivity (middle), and suction (bottom) a s<br />
functions of soil moisture content (0) . Everett gravelly sandy loam . M indicates mea n<br />
values used in model . Three samples were used to obtain the moisture-release curve .<br />
98
F ,<br />
20 .0 40 .0 60 .0 80 .0 100 .0 120 .0 140 .0 160 .0 180 .0 200 . 0<br />
ELAPSED TIME . (MIN .)<br />
Figure 2 . Precipitation (P), observed soil water flow (F), and modeled<br />
soil water flow (M) at 11 cm. Lysimeter suction was 50 cm of water .<br />
.0600<br />
120 .0 140 . 0<br />
Figure 3 . Precipitation (P), observed soil water flow (F), and modeled<br />
soil water flow (M) at 11 cm. Lysimeter suction was 88 cm of water .<br />
99
.0500<br />
.040 0<br />
z .030 0<br />
E<br />
L.)<br />
0 .020 0<br />
.0140<br />
I<br />
4 0 20 .0 40 .0 60 .0 80 . 0 100 . 0 120 . 0 146 . 0<br />
ELAPSED TIME . (MIN . ]<br />
Figure 4 . Precipitation (PI, observed soil water flow (F), and modele d<br />
soil water flow (M) at 11 cm . Lysimeter suction was 146 cm of water .<br />
tion provides a satisfactory description of th e<br />
flow of water in the upper rooting zone o f<br />
our Douglas-fir stand . Since the Everett<br />
gravelly sandy loam is extremely variable, our<br />
results probably should not be extrapolate d<br />
much beyond the local area in which the y<br />
were obtained .<br />
We have not been able to account for th e<br />
25 percent discrepancy between predicted<br />
and observed peak flows . A number of possible<br />
explanations have occurred to us . It can<br />
be argued that the lysimeter system is not a<br />
perfect device for measuring water flow in a<br />
vertical column of soil . For example, in the<br />
early stages of a flow experiment, acceleratio n<br />
of flow due to lysimeter suction may be<br />
greater than that due to gravity. Perhaps more<br />
significant may be variations in flow associated<br />
with the lack of homogeneity of an i n<br />
situ forest soil. We suspect that stones or<br />
roots in soil above the lysimeter plate diverte d<br />
water toward or away from the plate . Perhaps<br />
more important, our estimates of initial value s<br />
of 0 at several nodes are not accurate.<br />
It is probably more important to emphasiz e<br />
that the field experiments described here wer e<br />
conducted for purposes rather far removed<br />
from our present one of evaluating th e<br />
Richards equation as a possible component of<br />
a soil-plant-atmosphere model . We also wish<br />
to point out that the Richards equation has<br />
not received adequate evaluation in field situations,<br />
perhaps because the stringent under -<br />
lying assumptions are rarely satisfied . Th e<br />
rather close correspondence between model<br />
and observation that we have obtained suggests<br />
that the model may be more robust tha n<br />
has been generally believed .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The work reported in this paper was supported<br />
by National Science Foundation Grant<br />
No. GB-20963 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome ,<br />
U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems, Internationa l<br />
Biological Program . This is Contribution No .<br />
27 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome .<br />
100
Childs, E. C., and N . Collis-George . 1950 . The<br />
permeability of porous materials . Roy . Soc.<br />
London Proc. A 201 : 392-405 .<br />
Gardner, W. R. 1960. Dynamic aspects of<br />
water availability to plants . Soil Sci . 85 :<br />
63-72 .<br />
Gessel, S . P., and D . W. Cole. 1965 . Influence<br />
of removal of forest cover on movement o f<br />
water and associated elements through soil .<br />
J . Ann . Water Works Assoc . 57 :<br />
1301-1310 .<br />
Green, R . E., and J . C . Corey . 1971 . Calculation<br />
of hydraulic conductivity : a further<br />
evaluation of some predictive methods . Soil<br />
Sci. Am. Proc . 35 : 3-8 .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Marshall, T. J. 1958 . A relation between<br />
permeability and size distribution of pores .<br />
J. Soil Sci . 9 : 1-8 .<br />
Remson, I ., R. L. Drake, S . S. McNeary, and<br />
E. M. Wallo . 1965. Vertical drainage of an<br />
unsaturated soil . J. Hydraul . Div., Am . Soc .<br />
Civil Eng., Proc . 91 : 55-74 .<br />
Richards, L . A. 1931. Capillary conductio n<br />
through porous mediums . Physics 1 :<br />
318-333 .<br />
1948 . Porous plate apparatus fo r<br />
measuring moisture retention and trans -<br />
mission by soil . Soil Sci . 66 : 105-110.<br />
Rose, C . W. 1966 . Agricultural physics . 226 p .<br />
London: Pergamon Press .<br />
101
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Elemental transport changes occurring<br />
during development of a second-growth<br />
Douglas-fir ecosystem<br />
Charles C . Grie r<br />
Research Associat e<br />
an d<br />
Dale W . Cole<br />
Associate Professo r<br />
College of <strong>Forest</strong> Resources<br />
University of Washingto n<br />
Seattle, Washington 98195<br />
Abstract<br />
Mineral cycling processes in a second-growth Douglas-fir ecosystem have been monitored for nearly 10 year s<br />
at the A. E. Thompson Research Center in western Washington. In this interval, substantial year-to-yea r<br />
differences in quantities of elements transferred have been observed. For example, a comparison of transfers<br />
during the 1964-65 and 1970-71 measurement years showed that input of calcium by precipitation increase d<br />
roughly 300 percent while calcium transfer by throughfall, stem flow, and leaching from the forest floo r<br />
increased roughly 600 percent, 350 percent and 220 percent, respectively . In the same interval, the mass an d<br />
elemental content of the standing crop increased roughly 15 percent while forest floor mass and elementa l<br />
content remained constant. A portion of this difference is related to the increased mass accumulated in th e<br />
standing crop. However, the major factor causing this large difference is climatic variation . These differences in<br />
elemental transfer indicate the need for continuous observation of transfer processes to resolve the effects of<br />
ecosystem development on mineral cycling against this background of climatic variation .<br />
Introduction<br />
The growth and development of a coniferous<br />
forest ecosystem does not normally occu r<br />
in a steady linear fashion . Rather, intervals of<br />
rapid stand growth may be interrupted b y<br />
periods of slower growth reflecting changes in<br />
growing conditions . In turn, the cycling of<br />
elements within a forest ecosystem can be expected<br />
to reflect these changes .<br />
Intensive study of the mineral cycling processes<br />
in second-growth Douglas-fir stands ha s<br />
been in progress at the A. E. Thompson Re -<br />
search Center since 1961 . During this time, a<br />
substantial body of information has been collected<br />
concerning the amounts, pathways ,<br />
rates of transfer, and mechanisms controlling<br />
transfer of elements by the mineral cyclin g<br />
processes of this ecosystem. Between 196 1<br />
and 1966, research was concentrated largely<br />
on detailed descriptions of ecosystem components<br />
(Cole, Gessel, and Dice 1967) .<br />
Research at the Thompson site since 196 6<br />
has had two major objectives : (1) to provide<br />
information describing the changes in mineral<br />
cycling processes as the stand grows an d<br />
(2) to examine the year-to-year variation i n<br />
mineral cycling processes . More recently, a<br />
third objective has been to examine the relationships<br />
between climatic factors and th e<br />
various mechanisms controlling rates of transfer<br />
along the different transfer pathways .<br />
During the course of research at th e<br />
Thompson site, a number of changes in th e<br />
103
patterns of elemental cycling have been observed<br />
. Some of these changes are related t o<br />
changes in the structure or mass of the ecosystem;<br />
other changes are related to short -<br />
term variations in climatic factors . The<br />
purpose of this paper is to examine several of<br />
the changes in mineral cycling processes a s<br />
they have been observed during the 10 years<br />
of research at the Thompson Research Center .<br />
<strong>Experimental</strong> Area<br />
These studies were conducted at the A . E .<br />
Thompson Research Center, an area specifically<br />
developed for the study of elemental<br />
cycling in second-growth Douglas-fir stands . It<br />
is located about 64 km southeast of Seattle ,<br />
Washington, at an elevation of 215 m in the<br />
foothills of the Washington Cascades . A full<br />
description of the geology, soils, vegetation ,<br />
and climate is given by Cole and Gessel<br />
(1968) .<br />
The study site is located on a glacial out -<br />
wash terrace along the Cedar River. This outwash<br />
terrace was formed during the recessio n<br />
of the Puget lobe of the Fraser ice sheet abou t<br />
12,000 years ago .<br />
The soil underlying the research plots is<br />
classified as a typic haplorthod (U .S. Department<br />
of Agriculture 1960) and is mapped a s<br />
Everett gravelly, sandy loam. This soil contains<br />
less than 5 percent silt plus clay an d<br />
normally contains gravel amounting to 50-8 0<br />
percent of the soil volume. The forest floor is<br />
classified as a duff-mull (Hoover and Lun t<br />
1952) and ranges from 1 cm to 3 cm thick .<br />
This forest floor represents the accumulatio n<br />
since 1931 when the present stand was established<br />
following logging (around 1915) an d<br />
repeated fires .<br />
The present overstory vegetation is a<br />
planted stand of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga<br />
menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) which was established<br />
about 1931 . Currently, the trees average<br />
about 19 m high with a crown density o f<br />
about 85 percent .<br />
The principal understory species are salal<br />
(Gaultheria shallon Pursh), Oregon grap e<br />
(Berberis nervosa (Pursh) Nutt .), red huckleberry<br />
(Vaccinium parvifolium Smith), and<br />
twinflower (Linnaea borealis L . ssp . americana<br />
(Forbes) Rehder) . Various mosses are<br />
the principal understory vegetation beneath<br />
the denser portions of the canopy .<br />
The climate is typical of foothill condition s<br />
in the Puget Sound Basin . Temperatures have<br />
ranged from -18° C to 38° C, but these extremes<br />
are seldom reached . The average temperature<br />
for July is 16 .7° C and for January is<br />
2.8° C. The average annual precipitation i s<br />
136 cm, almost all falling as rain . Precipitation<br />
rates are generally less than 0 .25 cm/hour<br />
and over 70 percent falls between Octobe r<br />
and March .<br />
Field Plots<br />
The facilities at the research site are designed<br />
to provide precision measurement of<br />
the flux of elements within this forest ecosystem.<br />
Some transfers are monitored continuously;<br />
others, with less potential for rapid<br />
change, are measured at regular intervals . A<br />
detailed description of the collection facilitie s<br />
at this site is given by Cole and Gessel (1968) .<br />
The following section will briefly describe<br />
these facilities with emphasis on recen t<br />
changes in the system .<br />
Sampling<br />
Precipitation collections are made at two<br />
locations in the stand . One collector is at the<br />
top of a 30-m tower and is fitted with a flowmeter;<br />
the other is an automatic collecto r<br />
(Wong Laboratories) which opens at the onse t<br />
of precipitation and is mounted on a 10- m<br />
tower in a clearcut adjacent to the plots .<br />
Canopy drip (foliar leaching) is collected i n<br />
six randomly located screened funnel s<br />
mounted in the necks of collection flasks .<br />
Stemflow is diverted from the stem of the six<br />
sampled trees at breast height (1 .35 m) by<br />
soft rubber collars and is collected in covered<br />
160-liter polyethylene trash cans . Litter is collected<br />
on eight randomly located 0 .21 m 2<br />
plastic litter screens. Leaching through the<br />
forest floor and soil is measured using the<br />
tension lysimeter system developed by Col e<br />
(1968). This system permits direct measure -<br />
104
ment of the flux of ions through the soil . I n<br />
this plot, 3 lysimeters per soil horizon are located<br />
in the soil at the base of the forest<br />
floor, at the base of the A l horizon (4 cm)<br />
and B 2 horizon (30 cm) and at 100 cm in th e<br />
C horizon .<br />
Instrumentatio n<br />
Meteorological measurements including ai r<br />
and soil temperature profiles, are made on a<br />
continuous basis utilizing a data logging system.<br />
Details of this instrumentation are give n<br />
by Cole and Gessel (1968) .<br />
The data logging system also permits th e<br />
continuous monitoring of the pH and conductivity<br />
of water moving through this ecosystem.<br />
These facilities are described by Col e<br />
(1968). Volumes of water flow between different<br />
components of the system are measured<br />
using the resistance flowmeter describe d<br />
by Cole (1968) .<br />
Chemical Analysis<br />
Analytical methods used on samples fro m<br />
this site have changed over the years. For<br />
methods used in earlier studies, the reade r<br />
may consult the following reports : Rahma n<br />
(1964); Cole and Gessel (1965) ; and Cole ,<br />
Gessel, and Dice (1967) . The methods currently<br />
in use will be briefly described in the<br />
following paragraphs .<br />
Water Analysis<br />
Determinations of calcium, magnesium ,<br />
potassium, and sodium are normally made<br />
directly on water samples using an Instrumentation<br />
Laboratories-353 atomic-absorptio n<br />
spectrophotometer . Calcium is determined in<br />
a nitrous oxide-acetylene flame ; and magnesium,<br />
potassium, and sodium are deter -<br />
mined in an air-acetylene flame . Nitrogen an d<br />
phosphorus are determined from a hydroge n<br />
peroxide-sulfuric acid digest (Linder and Harley<br />
1942) of a 10-fold concentration of th e<br />
solutions. Nitrogen is determined using a<br />
micro-Kjeldahl distillation (Jackson 1958) .<br />
Phosphorus is determined using the chlorostannous-reduced<br />
molybdophosphoric blue<br />
color method of Jackson (1958). Total io n<br />
concentration is estimated from specific conductance<br />
using an empirical method (Logan<br />
1961) and pH is determined instrumentall y<br />
using established methods . Further details of<br />
water analysis are given by Grier (1972) .<br />
Soil Analysis<br />
Total soil nitrogen is determined using th e<br />
standard Kjeldahl digest and distillation o f<br />
Jackson (1958) . Cation exchange capacity i s<br />
determined using the neutral ammonium acetate<br />
leaching method (Jackson 1958) . Ex -<br />
changeable cations are determined spectrophotometrically<br />
from the ammonium acetat e<br />
leachate . Soil carbon is determined instrumentally<br />
using a Leco carbon analyzer . Phosphorus<br />
is extracted from the soil by digestio n<br />
in 36 N sulfuric acid and 30 percent hydroge n<br />
peroxide ; concentrations are then determine d<br />
following the same procedures as for water<br />
samples .<br />
Tissue and <strong>Forest</strong> Floor Analysi s<br />
Elemental assays of forest floor and plant<br />
tissue are done using methods described by<br />
Grier and McColl (1971) .<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
Table 1 shows how organic matter, calcium,<br />
potassium, nitrogen, and phosphoru s<br />
were distributed among different component s<br />
of the ecosystem at the Thompson site at th e<br />
end of 1965 (Cole, Gessel and Dice 1967) .<br />
Since the time of this determination, transfer s<br />
between these various components have bee n<br />
monitored to assess the changes and rates of<br />
change of elemental distribution in the stand .<br />
In the interval between 1966 and the present,<br />
the volume of woody tissue in the stan d<br />
has increased by an average of 11 m 3 /ha/yf ' .<br />
This represents approximately a 15-percent<br />
increase in volume since 1966 . Increases in<br />
mass and elemental content of most components<br />
of the standing crop are estimatedusing<br />
estimation procedures developed fo r<br />
105
these stands by Dice (1970)-to be proportional<br />
to the increase in woody tissue mass .<br />
However, the foliar mass has probably remained<br />
about constant in this interval . Thus<br />
at the present time, the quantities of elements<br />
and organic matter in the standing crop at this<br />
site are about 15 percent greater than show n<br />
in table 1 .<br />
In the same interval, other components of<br />
the ecosystem have shown relatively little<br />
change. For example, the forest floor was intensively<br />
sampled in 1961, 1 1965 (Cole, Gessel,<br />
and Dice 1967), and 1969 (Grier and Mc -<br />
Coll 1971) . Results of these studies are summarized<br />
in table 2 . With the exception o f<br />
magnesium content, the forest floor of thi s<br />
D . W . Cole . Unpublished data on file at the Colleg e<br />
of <strong>Forest</strong> Resources, University of Washington, Seattle .<br />
Table 1 .-Distribution of N, P, K, Ca, and organic matter (g/m 2 ) in a 35-year-old second-growt h<br />
Douglas-fir ecosystem at the Thompson Research Center (Cole, Gessel, and Dice 1967 )<br />
Component N P K Ca<br />
Organic<br />
matte r<br />
TREE<br />
Foliage current 2.4 0 .5 1 .6 0.7 199 . 0<br />
older 7.8 2 .4 4.6 6.6 710 . 7<br />
Branches current .4 .1 .3 .2 51 . 3<br />
older 4.0 .9 3.2 6.5 1,337 . 3<br />
dead 1.7 .2 .3 3.9 814 . 5<br />
Wood current 1.0 .2 1 .0 .4 748 . 5<br />
older 6.7 .7 4.2 4.3 11,420 . 2<br />
Bark 4.8 1.0 4.4 7.0 1,872 . 8<br />
Roots 3.2 .6 2.4 3.7 3,298 . 6<br />
Total tree 32 .0 6.6 22 .0 33 .3 20,452 . 9<br />
SUBORDINAT E<br />
VEGETATI<strong>ON</strong> .6 .1 .7 .9 101 . 0<br />
FOREST FLOO R<br />
Branches .5 .1 .4 .8 142 . 3<br />
Needles 3.5 .4 .5 2.7 300 . 5<br />
Wood 1.4 .2 .8 1 .7 634 . 5<br />
Humus 12 .1 1.9 1 .5 8.5 1,199 . 9<br />
Total forest floor 17 .5 2.6 3.2 13 .7 2,277 . 2<br />
SOIL<br />
0-15 cm<br />
80 .9 116 .7 7 .9 31 .3 3,837 . 2<br />
15-30 cm 86 .8 119 .5 6 .6 19 .6 3,693 . 5<br />
30-45 cm 76 .1 98 .0 5 .2 15 .2 2,829 . 0<br />
45-60 cm 37 .1 53 .6 3 .7 8.0 795 . 5<br />
Total soil 280 .9 387 .8 23 .4 74 .1 11,155 . 2<br />
TOTAL ECOSYSTEM 331 .0 397 .1 49 .3 122 .0 33,986 .3<br />
106
Table 2 .-<strong>Forest</strong> floor composition changes during an 8-year period in<br />
a Douglas-fir ecosystem at the Thompson Research Center<br />
Year<br />
sampled<br />
Dry<br />
weight<br />
N<br />
g/m 2<br />
P Ca Mg K<br />
1961 1,542 15 .4 2.2 11 .2 3 .8 2 . 4<br />
1964 1,500 16 .1 2.4 12 .0 3.7 2 . 4<br />
1969 1,430 14 .0 12 .3 1.9 2 .7<br />
ecosystem has changed only slightly since 196 1<br />
indicating that litterfall is balanced by decomposition.<br />
Similarly, there has been no significant<br />
change in elemental capital in the soi l<br />
(table 3) due both to the large reserves of mos t<br />
nutrients in this soil and to efficient cyclin g<br />
processes within the ecosystem . The decreas e<br />
in magnesium capital in the forest floor between<br />
1965 and 1969 may indicate increased<br />
rates of internal redistribution of magnesiu m<br />
within the standing crop . However, this i s<br />
doubtful in view of the small change in magnesium<br />
capital in the soil (table 3) .<br />
The quantities of cations transferred between<br />
components of the ecosystem generall y<br />
increased between 1964-65 and 1970-71 (table<br />
4). Comparison of some transfers during th e<br />
1970-71 measurement year with those of th e<br />
1964-65 measurement year (table 4) reveal s<br />
some rather substantial differences in both th e<br />
overall amounts transferred and in the relativ e<br />
importance of the various pathways .<br />
For example, input of calcium and potassium<br />
by precipitation is roughly four-fol d<br />
greater now than in 1964-65. This increas e<br />
may reflect a general increase in atmospheri c<br />
pollution in the Puget Sound basin . The quantities<br />
of calcium and potassium returned t o<br />
the soil from the aboveground vegetation hav e<br />
also increased since the 1964-65 measurement.<br />
As an example, return of calcium an d<br />
potassium by stemflow has increased 25- and<br />
35-fold, respectively, since measurement during<br />
1964-65 . Increases in return by foliar<br />
leaching also were observed (table 4) bu t<br />
these were not of the same magnitude as th e<br />
Increased return by stemflow. No explanation<br />
has been found for the differential increases<br />
in return by stemflow and foliar leaching .<br />
Return of elements by litterfall also in -<br />
creased between 1964-65 and 1970-71 (table<br />
4) . These differences are probably due both<br />
to normal year-to-year fluctuation of litterfal l<br />
and also to the increasing proportion o f<br />
branch material observed as a component o f<br />
the litter .<br />
Increases were also observed in leaching of<br />
elements through the soil profile . Leaching of<br />
calcium and potassium from the forest floo r<br />
roughly doubled between 1964-65 an d<br />
1970-71 (table 4) . A portion of this increase<br />
may result from increased rates of litter de -<br />
composition as well as the increased input in<br />
precipitation .<br />
As previously noted, the forest floor mas s<br />
appears to have approached a steady state<br />
condition (table 2) ; the present mass representing<br />
a quasi-equilibrium state, achieve d<br />
since the stand was established in 1931, afte r<br />
repeated fires through the area . On the other<br />
hand, litterfall quantity has increased durin g<br />
the period of observation of this stand. In<br />
table 5, monthly litterfall measured at thi s<br />
site in 1962-63 (Rahman 1964) is compared<br />
with measurements made during 1970-71 ; the<br />
annual mass of litterfall has apparently increased<br />
roughly 50 percent over this 8-yea r<br />
period. Thus the increased quantities of ele-<br />
10 7
Table 3.-Elemental capital in the soil of a second-growth Douglas-fir ecosystem<br />
at the Thompson Research Center as determined in 1965 and 197 1<br />
Depth<br />
g/m 2<br />
N P K Ca Mg<br />
A) 1965 :<br />
0-15 81 117 7.9 31 3 . 7<br />
15-30 87 120 6.6 20 3 . 5<br />
30-45 76 98 5.2 15 2 . 5<br />
45-60 37 54 3.7 8 1 . 2<br />
Total soil 281 389 23 .4 74 10 . 9<br />
B) 1971 :<br />
0-15 86 123 8.3 40 3 . 2<br />
15-30 82 111 6.6 21 3 . 3<br />
30-45 71 104 5.3 10 2 . 7<br />
45-60 40 52 4.2 11 1 . 5<br />
Total soil 279 390 24 .4 82 10 .7<br />
Table 4. Transfers of elements between components of a Douglas-fir ecosyste m<br />
at the Thompson Research Center during two stages of development '<br />
Item<br />
Calcium (g/m 2 ) Magnesium (g/m 2 ) Potassium (g/m 2 ) Sodium (g/m 2 )<br />
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2<br />
Precipitation 0.28 0.93 ND 0.22 0.08 0.47 ND 1 .6 8<br />
Throughfall .35 2.05 ND .49 1 .07 2 .83 ND 2 .5 9<br />
Stemflow .11 3.85 ND .60 .16 4.00 ND 2 .3 0<br />
Litterfall 1 .11 1.78 ND .20 .27 .47 ND .0 7<br />
Leaching fro m<br />
forest floor 1 .74 3.87 ND 1 .10 1 .05 2.60 ND 2 .1 8<br />
1 1=transfers measured during 1964-65 measurement year . Reported by Cole, Gessel and Dice (1967) .<br />
2=transfers measured during 1970-71 measurement year .<br />
108
Table 5 .-Monthly amounts of litterfall during two intervals in th e<br />
development of a second-growth Douglas-fir ecosyste m<br />
Month<br />
Quantity (g/m 2 )<br />
1962-63 1970-7 1<br />
October 73 .0 89 .0<br />
November 17 .9 44 . 5<br />
December 9.2 14 . 2<br />
January 6.5 10 . 0<br />
February 15 .9 3 . 8<br />
March 6 .2 13 . 8<br />
April 7 .4 5 . 8<br />
May 12 .8 ( I )<br />
June 11 .4 ( 1 )<br />
July 5 .2 39 .1 1<br />
August 5 .5 21 . 0<br />
September 12 .3 41 .6<br />
' Litterfall amounts for May, June, and July 1971 are combined in July collection .<br />
ments leached from the forest floor are a t<br />
least partially due to increased litter decomposition<br />
rates .<br />
Many of the changes in amount and relative<br />
importance of the transfer pathways sinc e<br />
1965, are probably due to changes in the mass<br />
and structure of this forest ecosystem . How -<br />
ever, many of the changes are completely ou t<br />
of proportion to estimates of increased mas s<br />
of the standing crop .<br />
Observations made since 1966 at th e<br />
Thompson site indicate that the return of elements<br />
to the soil and their subsequent distribution<br />
through the soil profile is sensitive t o<br />
certain climatic factors ; primarily precipitation<br />
and temperature . Variations in these<br />
climatic factors have been observed to cause<br />
substantial variation in quantities transferred<br />
along most pathways . As an example, the re -<br />
turn of elements to the soil by stemflow an d<br />
foliar leaching were found to be partially<br />
regulated by the distribution of precipitation ;<br />
especially precipitation occurring during th e<br />
summer. Figure 1 shows the monthly return<br />
of potassium by stemflow from one tree fo r<br />
1970 and 1971 ; the total amounts transferred<br />
being 0 .50 gm during 1970, and 0 .75 gm during<br />
1971 . Much of the greater amount re -<br />
turned during 1971 was returned during a fe w<br />
summer rainstorms . Foliar leaching, although<br />
not shown, exhibits a similar pattern of behavior.<br />
Apparently the extent of removal of<br />
potassium and other elements by leachin g<br />
from Douglas-fir foliage is related to its<br />
phenological stage . This suggests that precipitation<br />
occurring in certain critical parts of the<br />
year may remove elements that would other -<br />
wise remain in the plant .<br />
Temperature, the other major factor causing<br />
variation in year-to-year transfer rates ,<br />
exerts its control on transfers primaril y<br />
through its effect on organisms active in de -<br />
composition . Decomposer activity regulate s<br />
the availability of nutrient elements in tw o<br />
ways ; first, by regulating the rate of mineralization<br />
of elements and second, by its influence<br />
on levels of the mobile bicarbonate<br />
anion in the soil solution .<br />
10 9
(A . )<br />
f} Q<br />
2 0<br />
Figure 1 .<br />
A. Volume of stemflow from a 15-cm diameter Douglas-fir during 2 successive years .<br />
B. Quantity of potassium transferred to soil from a single 15-cm diameter Douglas-fir during 2 successive years .<br />
.2<br />
i<br />
N<br />
U<br />
N<br />
O<br />
U<br />
0<br />
20<br />
15<br />
4 JUNE<br />
6 - 7 JUN E<br />
1 k i<br />
1 1 k l 1<br />
2400<br />
O6DO 1200 1800<br />
TB[ OF DAY<br />
Figure 2 . Temperature effects on CO2 evolution from forest floor at Thompson Research Center (Ballard 1968) .<br />
110
Figure 2 illustrates how CO 2 production<br />
from the forest floor is related to temperatur e<br />
in this ecosystem (Ballard 1968) . Temperature<br />
effects on mineralization rates are probably<br />
directly proportional to the temperatur e<br />
effects on CO 2 production rates .<br />
The bicarbonate ion is the major anion i n<br />
soil solutions at the Thompson site. Moreover ,<br />
the concentration of this ion in the soil solution<br />
has been shown to be the major facto r<br />
controlling rates of cation leaching in these<br />
soils (McColl 1969) . Temperature effects o n<br />
the levels of the bicarbonate ion are related t o<br />
decomposer activity, since the equilibrium between<br />
CO2 in the soil atmosphere and HCO3<br />
in the soil solution is related to CO 2 concentration<br />
. Consequently, leaching rates in th e<br />
soil of the Thompson site are strongly relate d<br />
to temperature (McColl 1969) .<br />
Figure 3A illustrates the relationship between<br />
estimated ion concentration in fores t<br />
floor leachates and air temperature . As can be<br />
seen from these data, the ion concentratio n<br />
closely follows temperature during the year .<br />
Monthly variations in mean ion concentration<br />
of forest floor leachates for 3 successive years<br />
(figure 3B) are primarily the result of differences<br />
in mean monthly temperature .<br />
Total transfer by leaching is regulated both<br />
by temperature and the amount and date of<br />
-1C<br />
~'' 0''404%4P` EC I P . C<strong>ON</strong>DUCTANC E<br />
<strong>ON</strong>THLY PRECIP .<br />
~. _ _ -,'•<br />
■<br />
JAti FEB MAR APR NAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DE C<br />
0<br />
0<br />
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DE C<br />
Figure 3 .<br />
A. Mean monthly precipitation, air temperature, and specific conductance of precipitation and forest floo r<br />
leachates for the Thompson site during 1970 .<br />
B. Specific conductance of forest floor leachates for 3 consecutive years at the Thompson site .<br />
11L
Figure 4 . Rates of calcium leaching through soil profile and rate of precipitation during 1970-71 growing season .<br />
occurrence of precipitation . The largest quantities<br />
of elements are transferred during<br />
periods of relatively high temperatures and<br />
ample precipitation . Figure 4 illustrates the<br />
relationship between leaching of calcium from<br />
the forest floor and A horizon of the minera l<br />
soil in 1970-71 and precipitation in tha t<br />
interval . As can be seen from these data, the<br />
greatest quantities of calcium were transferre d<br />
during the spring and autumn when decomposer<br />
activity was relatively high and sufficient<br />
precipitation fell to flush the decomposition<br />
products into the soil .<br />
Conclusions<br />
Mineral cycling processes within a forest<br />
ecosystem are responsive to changes in th e<br />
mass and structure of the standing crop an d<br />
also to the shorter term effects of climatic<br />
variation . Of the two, the effects of climatic<br />
variation are the most readily seen . For this<br />
reason, any efforts to describe mineral cycling<br />
processes within a forest ecosystem must include<br />
sufficient data that effects of changes in<br />
mass and structure of the ecosystem can be<br />
resolved and separated from the large year-toyear<br />
effects of climatic variability .<br />
Present and future mineral cycling research<br />
at the Thompson site is directed towards<br />
separating and describing the possibly inter -<br />
dependent effects of growth and climate on<br />
mineral cycling processes in second-growt h<br />
Douglas-fir .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The work reported in this paper was sup -<br />
ported in part by National Science Foundation<br />
Grant No . GB-20963 to the Coniferous<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Biome, U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems ,<br />
International Biological Program. This i s<br />
Contribution No. 28 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong><br />
Biome, IBP .<br />
112
Ballard, T. M. 1968 . Carbon dioxide production<br />
and diffusion in forest floor materiala<br />
study of gas exchange in biologically<br />
active porous media. 120 p . Ph .D . thesis on<br />
file, Univ . Wash., Seattle .<br />
Cole, D . W . 1968 . A system for measuring<br />
conductivity, acidity, and rate of flow in a<br />
forest soil . Water Resour. Res. 4 :<br />
1127-1136 .<br />
and S . P . Gessel . 1965 . Movement<br />
of elements through a forest soil a s<br />
influenced by tree removal and fertilizer<br />
additions . In C. T . Youngberg (Ed .) <strong>Forest</strong>soil<br />
relationships in North America, p .<br />
95-104. Corvallis, Oreg. : Oreg. State Univ .<br />
Press .<br />
and S. P . Gessel . 1968 . Cedar<br />
River research-a program for studyin g<br />
pathways, rates and processes of elemental<br />
cycling in a forest ecosystem. For. Resour .<br />
Monogr . Contrib . No . 4, 53 p . Univ. Wash . ,<br />
Seattle .<br />
S. P. Gessel, and S . F. Dice .<br />
1967 . Distribution and cycling of nitrogen ,<br />
phosphorus, potassium, and calcium in a<br />
second-growth Douglas-fir ecosystem . In<br />
Primary productivity and mineral cycling in<br />
natural ecosystems-symposium, p .<br />
193-197. Assoc . Advan. Sci. 13th Annu .<br />
Meet. Orono : Univ . Maine Press .<br />
Dice, S . F. 1970 . The biomass and nutrien t<br />
flux in a second-growth Douglas-fir ecosystem<br />
(a study in quantitative ecology) .<br />
165 p . Ph .D . thesis on file, Univ . Wash . ,<br />
Seattle .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Grier, C . C. 1972 . Effects of fire on the movement<br />
and distribution of elements within a<br />
forest ecosystem. 167 p. Ph.D. thesis on<br />
file, Univ . Wash ., Seattle .<br />
and J. G . McColl . 1971 . <strong>Forest</strong><br />
floor characteristics within a small plot i n<br />
Douglas-fir in western Washington . Soil Sci .<br />
Soc. Am. Proc . 35 : 988-991 .<br />
Hoover, M . D., and A . H . Lunt . 1952 . A key<br />
for the classification of forest humus types .<br />
Soil Sci . Soc. Am. Proc . 16:368-370 .<br />
Jackson, M. L. 1958 . Soil chemical analysis .<br />
498 p. Englewood Cliffs, N .J . : Prentice-<br />
Hall, Inc .<br />
Linder, R . C., and C . P . Harley . 1942 . A rapid<br />
method for the determination of nitroge n<br />
in plant tissue . Science 96 : 565-566 .<br />
Logan, J. 1961 . Estimation of electrical conductivity<br />
from chemical analysis of natural<br />
waters. J . Geophys . Res . 66: 2479-2483 .<br />
McColl, J . G . 1969. Ion transport in a forest<br />
soil : models and mechanisms . 214 p . Ph.D .<br />
thesis on file, Univ . Wash., Seattle .<br />
and D. W. Cole. 1968 . A mechanism<br />
of cation transport in a forest soil .<br />
Northwest Sci . 42 : 134-140 .<br />
Rahman, A . H. M . M. 1964. A study of the<br />
movement of elements from tree crowns b y<br />
natural litterfall, stemflow and leaf wash .<br />
117 p. M.F. thesis on file, Univ . Wash . ,<br />
Seattle .<br />
U .S. Department of Agriculture. 1960. Soil<br />
classification-a comprehensive system-7th<br />
approximation. 265 p. Washington, D .C . :<br />
U .S. Govt. Print. Office .<br />
113
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Nutrient budget of a Douglasfir<br />
forest on an experimenta l<br />
watershed in western Oregon<br />
R . L . Fredrikse n<br />
Soil Scientist, <strong>Forest</strong>ry Sciences Laborator y<br />
Pacific Northwest <strong>Forest</strong> and Range Experiment Statio n<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Service, U .S . Department of Agricultur e<br />
Corvallis, Orego n<br />
Abstract<br />
Annual loss of nitrogen, phosphorus, silica, and the cations sodium, potassium, calcium, and magnesiu m<br />
followed the same pattern as annual runoff which is heavily dominated by winter rainstorms arising from th e<br />
Pacific Ocean. Even though 170 and 135 cm of water passed through this Douglas-fir ecosystem for the 2 year s<br />
reported here, this ecosystem conserved nitrogen effectively as indicated by an average annual dissolved nitroge n<br />
outflow of 0.5 kg/ha from an annual average input of 1 .0 kg/ha in precipitation . There was a small annual ne t<br />
loss of phosphorus (0.25 kg/ha) . Cation input in precipitation was less than 10 percent of sources from minera l<br />
weathering-indicating that mineral weathering was the principal source of cations to the system. Average<br />
annual net losses of calcium, sodium, magnesium, and potassium were : 47, 28, 11, and 1 .5 kg/ha, respectively.<br />
Silica loss of 99 kg/ha-yr was the largest of all constituents and came entirely from within the forest system .<br />
Although loss of sediment was low during the period of study, loss of nutrients by soil erosion may become of<br />
major importance over a longer time scale due to widely spaced unsampled catastrophic erosion .<br />
Introduction<br />
The purpose of this study was to measur e<br />
the inputs, losses, and retentions of specifi c<br />
plant nutrients .<br />
<strong>Forest</strong>ed watersheds have been used fo r<br />
decades to study the hydrologic cycle .<br />
Bormann and Likens (1967) indicated tha t<br />
small watersheds are suitable for studies of<br />
chemical cycles if the ecosystem is located o n<br />
a watershed with relatively impermeable bed -<br />
rock . Then, all annual chemical fluxes int o<br />
and out of the forest system can be attribute d<br />
to a definable forest ecosystem, and error s<br />
due to deep seepage can be minimized . Small<br />
watersheds containing soil-plant systems hav e<br />
been generally accepted as useful units fo r<br />
ecological research .<br />
Nutrient cycles begin with the establishment<br />
of vegetation, and the quantity o f<br />
nutrients cycled undoubtedly increases as the<br />
forest passes through successional phases . At<br />
all points, along this developmental sequence ,<br />
the supply of nutrients in the soil-plan t<br />
system is regulated by the balance betwee n<br />
(1) the inputs from the atmosphere an d<br />
mineral weathering and (2) the outflow b y<br />
soil erosion or chemicals dissolved in stream<br />
water. A continued level of fertility of th e<br />
system therefore depends upon the retentio n<br />
of nutrients in the cycle from loss by leachin g<br />
and soil erosion .<br />
Nutrient budget studies were begun on two<br />
small watersheds at the H . J. <strong>Andrews</strong> <strong>Experimental</strong><br />
<strong>Forest</strong> in 1967 . Only the initial results<br />
from one of these and the chemicals in solution<br />
will be reported here . The followin g<br />
questions were asked :<br />
1 . What quantities of nitrogen, phosphorus ,<br />
the cations (sodium, potassium, calcium ,<br />
magnesium), and silica reach the site i n<br />
precipitation?<br />
115
2. How effectively are these chemicals retained<br />
by the forest ?<br />
3. What hypotheses can be made about th e<br />
processes that regulate the gain or loss o f<br />
these chemicals from the forest ?<br />
The 10.1-hectare study watershed, designated<br />
number 10 in <strong>Forest</strong> Service studies ,<br />
occupies strongly dissected topograph y<br />
characteristic of the west side of the Cascade<br />
Range. It rises from 430 m elevation at the<br />
stream gaging station to 670 m at the highes t<br />
point on the back ridge. The overall slope is<br />
44 percent, but side slopes and the headwal l<br />
range up to 90 percent due to deep incision of<br />
the basin into the main ridge . Soils, fro m<br />
weathered tuff and breccia materials, hav e<br />
weakly developed profiles that often overlie<br />
saprolite up to 6 m deep . Tree roots are mos t<br />
abundant in the surface 0 .6 m and probably<br />
do not penetrate much deeper than 2 .4 m .<br />
The saprolite is porous and therefore can<br />
transmit water . The average annual precipitation<br />
is 230 cm .<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> vegetation on the watershed consist s<br />
of remnants of a 450-year-old Douglas-fi r<br />
(Pseudotsuga menziesii) stand and islands of<br />
various younger age classes which originate d<br />
when the old-growth stand was broken up by<br />
windthrow, disease, or fire . Because the basin<br />
is oriented toward the southwest, the sid e<br />
slopes within it face south, west, and north . A<br />
considerable diversity in vegetation on thes e<br />
slopes has recently been classified for th e<br />
<strong>Experimental</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> by Dyrness, Franklin ,<br />
and Moir (personal communication) . Douglasfir<br />
climax forests occupy ridgetop and upper<br />
slope south aspect positions on the watershed .<br />
A dense evergreen shrub layer, compose d<br />
mainly of golden chinkapin (Castanopsis<br />
chrysophylla), Pacific rhododendron (Rhododendron<br />
macrophyllum), and salal (Gaultheria<br />
shallon) codominates the site beneath a spars e<br />
stand of old-growth trees. Western hemloc k<br />
climax forests make up the remainder of th e<br />
vegetation on the watershed . On these habitats,<br />
the dominant overstory is mainl y<br />
Douglas-fir and western hemlock (Tsuga<br />
heterophylla) . Proceeding from west to north<br />
aspects along a gradient of increasing moisture,<br />
the shrub cover shifts from vine maple<br />
(Acer circinatum)-salal, to rhododendron -<br />
Oregon grape (Mahonia nervosa) and finally<br />
to vine maple-western sword fer n<br />
(Polystichum munitum) on moist, northfacing<br />
middle and lower slopes .<br />
Methods<br />
Precipitation and streamflow are sample d<br />
by the following techniques . Precipitation at<br />
the top and bottom of the watershed i s<br />
measured by standard rain gages ; samples for<br />
chemical analysis are obtained from a specia l<br />
collector mounted on a tower 18 m tall in th e<br />
center of a nearby clearcut . At the outlet o f<br />
the watershed, an H-flume gages streamflo w<br />
and a proportional water sampler, capable of<br />
sampling both dissolved and suspended materials<br />
from the stream, composites discret e<br />
water samples in a polyethylene carbo y<br />
(Fredriksen 1969) . The samples are remove d<br />
at approximately 3-week intervals throughou t<br />
the year. In 1970 and 1971, grab sample s<br />
were taken from low summer flows ; and during<br />
the winter of 1971-72, a series of gra b<br />
samples were collected from streamflow during<br />
storm runoff events . In the laboratory ,<br />
solids are removed by filtration through a fine<br />
glass fiber filter (Whatman GF/C) from bot h<br />
precipitation and streamflow samples and<br />
chemical analyses were performed on bot h<br />
fractions. The fraction that passes the filter i s<br />
considered to be dissolved although we recognize<br />
that the filtered water may contain som e<br />
particles smaller than 2 microns in diameter .<br />
Since the concentration of each chemica l<br />
constituent is an estimate of the mean for th e<br />
time during which the sample was collected ,<br />
the input or loss for each sampling period is<br />
the product of precipitation or streamflow,<br />
respectively, and the concentration of eac h<br />
constituent .<br />
Chemical analyses were done in duplicat e<br />
as follows : Ammonium and dissolved organi c<br />
nitrogen by distillation and digestion, respectively,<br />
on 1/2-liter samples and detection b y<br />
Nesslerization; nitrite by the sulphanilamid e<br />
method ; nitrate by reduction and detection a s<br />
nitrite ; orthophosphorus by the molybdat e<br />
blue method ; total phosphorus by the<br />
molybdate blue method following a per -<br />
116
sulfate-sulfuric acid digestion in the autoclave ;<br />
reactive silica by the molybdate yello w<br />
method ; cations sodium and potassium by<br />
flame emission ; and calcium and magnesium<br />
by atomic absorption following addition of<br />
lanthanum as a masking agent .<br />
Detection limits (mg/1) for the following<br />
chemicals were : organic nitrogen, 0 .005 ;<br />
nitrate and nitrite, 0 .0005 ; phosphorus ,<br />
0.005; sodium, 0.05 ; potassium, 0 .1 ; calcium ,<br />
0.4; magnesium, 0.05 ; and silica, 0 .1 .<br />
Results<br />
Nutrient Input in Precipitatio n<br />
Total amounts of nutrients dissolved i n<br />
precipitation and the annual rainfall are give n<br />
in table 1 . Nitrogen enters the forest syste m<br />
mainly in organic substances ; nitrate average d<br />
only 13 percent of all nitrogen forms for th e<br />
2-year period. In that period, only trac e<br />
amounts of ammonia nitrogen were detected ,<br />
and a small quantity of nitrite in 1970. The<br />
phosphorus came mainly in organic form in<br />
two collections in the fall of 1969 . Of the<br />
cations, input of calcium was the greates t<br />
followed by sodium, magnesium, and potassium<br />
in descending order . Traces of silica were<br />
found in only five of the 14 collections in<br />
1970 .<br />
There was also an input of particulate<br />
matter from the atmosphere that measure d<br />
upwards of 3 to 5 kg/ha-yr . Although the<br />
average dustfall for 3 years was nearly equally<br />
divided between the dry season (April -<br />
October) and the wet season (November-<br />
March), the proportion in the wet season<br />
varied from 33 to 65 percent of the total fo r<br />
individual years .<br />
Nutrient Loss in Streamflo w<br />
Nitrogen is transported in the stream al -<br />
most entirely in the form of organic matter<br />
(table 2). Though water samples from thi s<br />
watershed were contaminated with nitrat e<br />
from the exhausts of propane heaters, the<br />
nitrate nitrogen outflow from another un-<br />
Table 1.-Nutrient input in precipitation for th e<br />
period October 1 through September 3 0<br />
Constituent in<br />
rainwater<br />
1969 1970<br />
-------------------- hg/ha-yr<br />
NO 3 -N 0 .06 0 .2 0<br />
N0 2 -N 0 .0 1<br />
Organic N 1 .02 .69<br />
All N 1 .08 .9 0<br />
Ortho P ( 1 ) .0 1<br />
Total P ( 1 ) .2 7<br />
Na 1 .17 2 .3 4<br />
K .27 .1 1<br />
Ca 7 .65 2 .3 3<br />
Mg .72 1 .3 2<br />
Si (' ) ( 2 )<br />
Precipitation (cm) 251 215<br />
1 Missing data.<br />
2 Trace .<br />
11 7
Table 2 .-Nutrient budget for dissolved constituents of precipitation an d<br />
runoff for the period October 1 through September 3 0<br />
Element<br />
1969 1970<br />
Input Outflow Net Input Outflow Net<br />
N L08 +0 .50 0 .90 0 .38 +0 .5 2<br />
Total P (') (') 1 (') .27 .52 -.2 5<br />
Na 1 .17 33 .66 -32.49 2 .34 25 .72 -23 .3 8<br />
K .27 1 .24 -.97 .11 2 .25 -2 .1 4<br />
Ca 7 .65 53 .65 -46 .00 2 .33 50 .32 -47 .9 9<br />
Mg .72 12 .70 -11 .98 1 .32 12 .44 -11 .1 2<br />
Si (') (') (') (2 ) 99 .3 -99 . 3<br />
H2 0-cm 251 170 81 215 135 80<br />
' Missing data .<br />
2 Trace .<br />
disturbed watershed nearby was 0 .00 4<br />
kg/ha-yr . A similar nitrogen outflow can be<br />
expected for the study watershed . Ammonium<br />
and nitrite do not occur in measurable<br />
concentrations .<br />
Total phosphorus outflow, both organi c<br />
and inorganic, was about in the same order o f<br />
magnitude as outflow for nitrogen. The<br />
organic form predominates in spring, summer,<br />
and fall seasons but reaches minimum value s<br />
in midwinter when the forest and soils are<br />
repeatedly flushed by rainwater . Orthophosphorus<br />
concentration remained nearl y<br />
constant throughout the year, varying fro m<br />
0.01 to 0 .02 mg/l.<br />
Cation and silica outflows were much large r<br />
than those of nitrogen and phosphorus . Potassium<br />
export was much smaller than that of<br />
other cations . Silica outflow was the largest of<br />
all the dissolved constituents . Transport of<br />
suspended sediment was 67 and 37 kg/ha-y r<br />
for 1969 and 1970, respectively .<br />
Net Loss from the Watershed<br />
The nutrient budget in table 2 results from<br />
the subtraction of the nutrient outflow in the<br />
stream and the input in precipitation . Net<br />
loss or gain is indicated by positive and negative<br />
values, respectively .<br />
The small annual nitrogen gain of about 0 . 5<br />
kg/ha was nearly the same for the 2 years . For<br />
all other mineral constituents of runoff, more<br />
was lost than was gained in precipitation .<br />
Phosphorus losses are relatively small and in<br />
the same order of magnitude as nitroge n<br />
losses. The cation and silica losses were fro m<br />
one to two orders of magnitude larger than<br />
those of nitrogen and phosphorus . Of th e<br />
cations, calcium losses were greatest followe d<br />
in descending order by sodium, magnesium ,<br />
and potassium. Of all constituents, silic a<br />
losses were greatest . Though precipitation an d<br />
runoff were greater in 1969, the use of water<br />
by the forest was nearly equal for the 2 years .<br />
118
Time Trends of Outflow and Concentratio n<br />
of Selected Chemicals<br />
Movement of water in the forest system i s<br />
obviously the dominant factor regulating th e<br />
flow of chemicals . However, moderation o f<br />
the annual chemical outflow pattern can b e<br />
expected from processes such as organi c<br />
decomposition, uptake into plants, an d<br />
mineral weathering . These processes may b e<br />
regulated by the hydrologic and thermal state<br />
of the forest system.<br />
The time trends of soil temperature an d<br />
water content are indicated on figure 1 . Be -<br />
cause precipitation occurs mainly during th e<br />
fall and winter months with less than 2 percent<br />
of the annual total in July and August,<br />
substantial withdrawals of water from the soi l<br />
are made by the forest during the summer .<br />
Water content of the top 30 cm of soi l<br />
reaches minima, near the wilting point ,<br />
usually in late August or early September .<br />
Fall rainstorms normally recharge the soi l<br />
mantle to field capacity by the end o f<br />
December, although recharge of the surfac e<br />
soil may occur from 1 to 2 months earlier .<br />
The soil temperature cycle is the inverse o f<br />
the soil water cycle . Maxima near 14° C occur<br />
in August and minima from 0° to 2° C are<br />
common from December through March .<br />
Precipitation and runoff for 1970 are illustrated<br />
in figure 2 for the periods that composite<br />
streamflow and precipitation samples were<br />
taken. Precipitation exceeded runoff by a<br />
wide margin in the fall of 1969 until soils<br />
reached field capacity sometime in late<br />
December or early January . The soil remained<br />
near field capacity until precipitation fell to<br />
low levels in early May . Wetting fronts from<br />
precipitation and snowmelt can pass through<br />
the soil mantle of the watershed during this<br />
period. Runoff declined rapidly with the in -<br />
crease of evapotranspiration and reduction of<br />
precipitation in the spring and summe r<br />
months .<br />
Organic nitrogen, calcium, and silica wer e<br />
chosen to illustrate the differences that exis t<br />
in annual concentration and outflow patterns<br />
(figs . 3, 4, and 5) . The influence of water ca n<br />
be seen immediately from the general correspondence<br />
of the stream runoff and chemical<br />
outflow cycles . Minimum chemical outflo w<br />
occurs in summer and fall while streamflow i s<br />
low; maximum chemical outflow comes with<br />
high runoff in the winter months. However ,<br />
the concentration patterns vary considerabl y<br />
between the three, and there are notabl e<br />
differences in outflow between organic nitrogen<br />
and the other two (calcium and silica)<br />
during the winter season .<br />
Organic Nitroge n<br />
The high concentration of organic nitrogen<br />
in October 1969 (fig. 3) came at a time when<br />
soils were dry (fig. 1) and could store all<br />
precipitation except that which falls directly<br />
into the stream or runs off rock and shallo w<br />
soil areas adjacent to the stream . After a<br />
decline in early November (fig . 3), the concentration<br />
and outflow rose to a peak in<br />
December when soils probably had reached<br />
field capacity (figs . 1 and 2) and wetting<br />
fronts from precipitation could pass through<br />
the soil mantle . Organic nitrogen outflo w<br />
remained high and reached a secondary peak<br />
in late January at peak runoff (fig . 3). As<br />
precipitation and runoff declined in February ,<br />
concentration and outflow reached low value s<br />
(figs. 2 and 3). The concentration and outflow<br />
rose again in late winter and early sprin g<br />
as precipitation increased (figs . 2 and 3) . Outflow<br />
and concentration declined in April an d<br />
May as precipitation declined and soil wate r<br />
storage dropped below field capacity (figs . 1 ,<br />
2, and 3) . Increased concentration in summe r<br />
had little effect on outflow due to very low<br />
runoff (fig . 3) .<br />
Though the forest system retains mor e<br />
organic nitrogen than it loses (table 2), th e<br />
gain is not uniform throughout the year .<br />
From mid-December to mid-February, th e<br />
forest system lost more in outflow than i t<br />
gained in precipitation; for the remaining 1 0<br />
months, there was a net retention of organi c<br />
nitrogen (fig . 6). For the 2-month midwinte r<br />
period, the outflow in runoff (0 .28 kg/ha)<br />
exceeded the input in precipitation<br />
(0.16 kg/ha) by 0 .12 kg/ha. There was an in -<br />
creasing margin during the 2 months .<br />
Contributions to the stream from the fores t<br />
119
Figure 1 . Water content of the surface 30 cm and temperature at 15 cm in the soil of an old-growth Douglas-fi r<br />
forest.<br />
120
30_<br />
20_<br />
E<br />
U<br />
10-<br />
0<br />
Figure 2 . Precipitation and runoff for an undisturbed Douglas-fir forest for each sampling period, 1969-70 .<br />
121
0.12_ _30<br />
rn<br />
z<br />
0<br />
Q<br />
z<br />
w<br />
0<br />
z<br />
0<br />
0<br />
z<br />
Q<br />
c<br />
o.10_<br />
0.08_<br />
0.06_<br />
rn 0.04_,<br />
-<br />
.-.Outflow<br />
Concentratio n<br />
___ Runoff<br />
_20<br />
Jo<br />
E<br />
U<br />
0<br />
u_ 0.02_<br />
I<br />
D<br />
0<br />
0.00<br />
2 r 0<br />
Figure 3 . Concentration and outflow of organic nitrogen dissolved in stream water and runoff per samplin g<br />
period from an undisturbed Douglas-fir forest, 1969-70.<br />
122
_20<br />
E<br />
U<br />
_10<br />
0<br />
10' '12 '<br />
4- 1969-*<br />
' 2 1 1 4 1<br />
1970<br />
1 6 ' 1 8<br />
0<br />
Figure 4 . Concentration and outflow of calcium dissolved in stream water and runoff per sampling period fro m<br />
an undisturbed Douglas-fir forest, 1969-70 .<br />
123
_3 0<br />
. Outflow<br />
Concentration<br />
_ __ Runoff<br />
E<br />
U<br />
0<br />
Figure 5 . Concentration and loss of silica dissolved in stream water and runoff per sampling period from a n<br />
undisturbed Douglas-fir forest, 1969-70 .<br />
124
Figure 6. Input in precipitation and loss in runoff of dissolved organic nitrogen for each sampling period ,<br />
1969-70 .<br />
125
0.10_<br />
0.08 _<br />
Pea k<br />
0.04_<br />
Concentration in precipitation<br />
0.02<br />
I I I I I I<br />
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 .0 1 .2<br />
STR EAM FLOW (m 3/ km 2 -sec )<br />
Figure 7 . Concentration of organic nitrogen dissolved in streamfiow during a storm runoff event Novembe r<br />
25-29, 1971 .<br />
126
and precipitation can be illustrated from a se t<br />
of samples taken during a storm runoff even t<br />
in late November 1971 (fig. 7). The rapi d<br />
initial rise of organic nitrogen concentratio n<br />
can be attributed to flushing of availabl e<br />
sources within the vegetation, soil, and atmosphere<br />
. The concentration declined as source s<br />
within the system were depleted and stream -<br />
flow rose by about one order of magnitude t o<br />
peak flow. The concentration rapidly declined<br />
on the recession curve to values slightly larger<br />
than the mean concentration in precipitation .<br />
Calcium<br />
Calcium outflow closely followed the run -<br />
off cycle (fig. 4) . The twofold to threefold<br />
increase in concentration from winter to the<br />
warm seasons had only minimal control o n<br />
calcium outflow compared with the hundredfold<br />
variation in annual runoff. The abrupt<br />
concentration drop in late November and th e<br />
rise in May corresponds approximately to th e<br />
time that the soil reaches field capacity in th e<br />
winter and falls below field capacity in the<br />
spring (fig . 1) .<br />
The calcium and bicarbonate carbon con -<br />
tent of the streamflow follow a similar pat -<br />
tern (fig. 8). Winter season values were nearl y<br />
constant whereas warm season stream con -<br />
tents rose sharply for streamflow values les s<br />
than 0.1 m 3 /km 2 -sec. The change in slop e<br />
(fig. 8) corresponds approximately to th e<br />
change in streamflow regimes (fig . 4) and th e<br />
time that soil water content rises to fiel d<br />
capacity in the winter and departs from it i n<br />
summer (fig . 1) .<br />
Silica<br />
The occurrence of minimum silica concentration<br />
in the dry and warm seasons of th e<br />
year and maxima in the winter and earl y<br />
spring (fig. 5) strongly contrasts calcium concentration-time<br />
trends (fig . 4). The silic a<br />
concentration increase in December an d<br />
January corresponds to the time of expecte d<br />
recharge of the soil to field capacity . Th e<br />
continued elevation of silica concentratio n<br />
through the winter season suggests tha t<br />
soluble silica is either released by weathering<br />
processes at that time or that it accumulated<br />
during the warm season of the year and i s<br />
removed when wetting fronts flush the soil<br />
mantle in midwinter . The reduction of concentration<br />
in late April corresponds to th e<br />
time that subsoils drain as the forest responds<br />
to evaporative demand and precipitation<br />
lessens .<br />
Discussion<br />
Organic nitrogen has seldom been identified<br />
in precipitation . Tarrant et al. (1968)<br />
found values of nitrogen input (1 .49 kg/ha-yr )<br />
similar to those reported here (table 1) and in<br />
the same proportions of organic to nitrat e<br />
nitrogen (87 and 13 percent, respectively) .<br />
Organic nitrogen from 0 .02 to 0.20 mg/1 was<br />
also found in New Zealand snows by Wilson<br />
(1959). Only trace amounts of ammoniu m<br />
were found in the present study and in tha t<br />
by Tarrant et al . (1968). However, Moodie<br />
(1964) reported from 1 to 6 kg/ha-yr of<br />
ammonium nitrogen at several agricultural<br />
sites in western Washington. Values of input<br />
for cations, sodium, potassium, calcium, an d<br />
magnesium (table 1) were generally similar to<br />
those reported by Moodie .<br />
Atmospheric particulate matter may con -<br />
tribute substantially to nitrogen and phosphorus<br />
input . A large proportion of this i s<br />
undoubtedly of local terrestrial origin durin g<br />
the dry season and arises from road dust ,<br />
pollen, and smoke particles . From November<br />
through March, when the local environment i s<br />
regularly dampened by precipitation, particulate<br />
matter is thought to be carried from th e<br />
Pacific Ocean in prevailing westerly winds .<br />
Presumably, the finest particles pass the filter s<br />
we use to separate solids from water and con -<br />
tribute to the "dissolved nutrients ." Nearly al l<br />
the phosphorus and 72 percent of the nitrogen<br />
resulted from a digestion of substances in<br />
rainwater collected during the dry seasons<br />
(table 1) .<br />
This forest system retains nitrogen ver y<br />
effectively . The net gain of 0 .5 kg/ha (table 2 )<br />
is nearly equal to that reported by Cole et al .<br />
(1967). The fact that this result was duplicated<br />
on two Douglas-fir stands, very divers e<br />
127
8J<br />
Calciu m<br />
0<br />
I I I I<br />
0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00<br />
STREAM FLOW (m 3/ K km 2 -sec )<br />
Figure 8 . Concentration of calcium and alkalinity as bicarbonate carbon in streamflow, 1970-72 .<br />
1 28
in terms of soil and stand structure, suggests<br />
that this retention property may be genera l<br />
for Douglas-fir forests west of the Cascade<br />
Range in the Northwestern United States .<br />
Although an explanation for this retentio n<br />
must await the completion of research now in<br />
progress, it appears from the small organic<br />
nitrogen outflow that most of the solubl e<br />
organic substances released from decomposition<br />
of detritus and organism excretions are<br />
rapidly incorporated by the organisms of th e<br />
forest. Nitrate nitrogen outflow is also regulated<br />
to levels much less than the input i n<br />
precipitation. Either nitrification rates are<br />
very low in the soils or the nitrate is retaine d<br />
and rapidly incorporated by the fores t<br />
system. Nitrification is active in the acid soil s<br />
of conifer forests on the Oregon coast (Bolle n<br />
and Lu 1968), but this information is lacking<br />
for soils of the H . J . <strong>Andrews</strong> <strong>Experimental</strong><br />
<strong>Forest</strong> .<br />
The status of nitrogen capital of a Douglas -<br />
fir forest is the result of a number of processes<br />
including input in precipitation, fixation<br />
by free living organisms such as blue-green<br />
algae and soil bacteria, and fixation by micro -<br />
organisms living in symbiotic association wit h<br />
a host plant. If the forest gains 0 .5 kg/ha<br />
annually, as is indicated by this short perio d<br />
of record, 8,000 years would be required t o<br />
accumulate the 4,000 kg/ha of organic nitrogen<br />
found in the more fertile soils of the<br />
study watershed. Additions of nitroge n<br />
symbiotically fixed by Ceanothus velutinu s<br />
may be somewhat larger . If Ceanothu s<br />
velutinus stands persist for 20 years and fi x<br />
20 kg/ha annually as Zavitkovski and Newto n<br />
(1968) suggest, and if generations of thes e<br />
brush stands are induced by fire at intervals o f<br />
200 years, then 16,000 kg/ha of nitrogen<br />
would accumulate in 8,000 years. From this,<br />
deductions must be made for losses by soi l<br />
erosion and microbial and fire volatilization .<br />
In any case, inputs of nitrogen in precipitation<br />
must be considered of importance compared<br />
with other mechanisms of gain and los s<br />
by the forest .<br />
Phosphorus outflow from the forest wa s<br />
similar to that of nitrogen (table 2) . Loss<br />
occurs as both organic phosphorus and orthophosphorus<br />
. The organic form predominates<br />
in the warm seasons of the year when there i s<br />
a rapid biological turnover of phosphorus b y<br />
the forest. Concentration of the ortho form re -<br />
mains fairly constant throughout the year and<br />
is thought to arise from mineral weathering .<br />
The losses of the cations sodium, potassium,<br />
calcium, and magnesium were large<br />
compared with those of nitrogen and phosphorus<br />
and represent excess amounts of thes e<br />
cations to the annual requirements of th e<br />
forest vegetation (table 2) . These losses are<br />
approximately four times those reported fo r<br />
the Hubbard Brook ecosystem in New Hampshire<br />
except for the potassium values whic h<br />
were nearly equal to those reported her e<br />
(Likens et al. 1970). Cole et al. (1967) also<br />
reported lower losses of potassium and calcium.<br />
The cation and silica losses (table 2) are<br />
estimates of the annual release of these chemicals<br />
by mineral weathering . In this regard, it<br />
is interesting to note that the ratio of<br />
Si :Ca:Na:Mg weathering rates for 1970 ar e<br />
8.9 :4.3 :2.1 :1 .<br />
Another mechanism for nutrient loss is th e<br />
particulate matter that is transported by the<br />
stream. This material may arise from soil<br />
erosion or from organic detritus from the<br />
forest. Losses of suspended sediment fro m<br />
this study (67 and 37 kg/ha-yr) were much<br />
lower than the 12-year annual average of 13 3<br />
kg/ha from another undisturbed watershed in<br />
the <strong>Experimental</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> (Fredriksen 1970) .<br />
Although we have not quantified the chemical<br />
loss by this means in this study, previousl y<br />
published annual losses of 0.16 kg/ha for<br />
organic nitrogen represent less than half of<br />
the dissolved component loss (table 2), still a n<br />
important part of the total nitrogen loss<br />
(Fredriksen 1971) . Cation loss was much les s<br />
than 1 percent of the loss in dissolved form .<br />
However, since erosion losses are very sporadic<br />
and dependent on extremes of storm<br />
runoff events, and the results (Fredrikse n<br />
1971) are indicative of the chemical loss during<br />
a relatively quiescent period, they shoul d<br />
be taken as minimum estimates of nutrien t<br />
loss by soil erosion processes .<br />
Biological and chemical processes of th e<br />
forest that control nutrient mobilization an d<br />
retention are undoubtedly closely linked to<br />
environmental factors. The movement of<br />
129
water is dominant because flowing water i s<br />
required to transport materials to the sites of<br />
physical-chemical and biochemical activity<br />
and to remove byproducts that appear in the<br />
outflow of experimental watersheds .<br />
Definite concentration changes in th e<br />
stream occur at the transition periods fro m<br />
drying to wetting of the forest system (figs . 3 ,<br />
4, and 5) . A key feature is either retention o f<br />
precipitation (and reaction byproducts) in soil<br />
storage or the passage of wetting front s<br />
through the soil mantle when the soils are a t<br />
field capacity . It is not surprising that, of th e<br />
annual totals, 77 percent of the calcium, 8 0<br />
percent of the organic nitrogen, and 83 per -<br />
cent of the silica were exported from th e<br />
forest in the 5 months from December 196 9<br />
through April 1970 . During this period, th e<br />
soil mantle was at field capacity and wettin g<br />
fronts from winter rainstorms regularl y<br />
flushed the entire forest system .<br />
For organic nitrogen (fig . 3), the period of<br />
maximum outflow corresponds to the tim e<br />
when wetting fronts begin to pass through the<br />
soil mantle in early December . The widening<br />
margin between input and outflow (fig. 6 )<br />
indicates an increasing contribution to outflow<br />
of organic nitrogen from the forest<br />
system. Although we do not know how muc h<br />
organic nitrogen from precipitation directl y<br />
supplements streamflow, the increased concentration<br />
and content in precipitation an d<br />
streamflow in late January suggest that<br />
sources of organic nitrogen in precipitatio n<br />
may directly augment the outflow from this<br />
experimental catchment .<br />
There is a definite change in the calcium<br />
content of streamflow as the hydrologic state<br />
of the forest system changes from winter to<br />
summer (fig. 8). The calcium outflow was<br />
closely paralleled by the content of carbonate<br />
and bicarbonate-the predominant anions of<br />
the stream . McColl and Cole (1968) demonstrated<br />
that cation mobilization is effectively<br />
controlled by these mobile anions that are<br />
formed by the carbonation of water with<br />
carbon dioxide released by respiring organisms<br />
of the forest . As yet, we cannot explain<br />
the processes that maintain a nearly constant<br />
concentration of calcium and these mobil e<br />
anions over the range of winter streamflow .<br />
Silica is nearly absent in precipitation an d<br />
is therefore entirely generated within the soil -<br />
forest system (fig. 5). Although the paren t<br />
materials of soil are the primary source o f<br />
silica, silica is cycled in generous amounts b y<br />
forests as indicated by litterfall studie s<br />
(Remezov et al. 1955) and the occurrence o f<br />
plant opal crystals in forest soils (Paeth<br />
1970). Silica in streamflow may originate<br />
from primary mineral weathering, secondary<br />
mineral dissolution, or release from decomposition<br />
of detritus . Silica may be taken out o f<br />
solution by formation of secondary mineral s<br />
within the soil . The occurrence of minimu m<br />
silica concentration in the dry and war m<br />
seasons of the year and maxima in the winte r<br />
and early spring strongly contrasts calciu m<br />
concentration-time trends (fig . 4) .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The work reported in this paper was sup -<br />
ported by the U .S. <strong>Forest</strong> Service in cooperation<br />
with the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome, U.S .<br />
Analysis of Ecosystems, International Biological<br />
Program. This is Contribution No . 29 to th e<br />
Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Bollen, W. B., and K . C. Lu. 1968. Nitroge n<br />
transformations in soils beneath red alde r<br />
and conifers . In J. M. Trappe, J . F. Franklin,<br />
R . F . Tarrant, and G . M. Hansen (eds .) ,<br />
Biology of alder, p. 141-148 . Pac. North -<br />
west <strong>Forest</strong> & Range Exp . Stn., Portland ,<br />
Oreg .<br />
Bormann, F. H., and G. E. Likens . 1967 .<br />
Nutrient cycling . Science 155 : 424-429 .<br />
Cole, D . W., S. P. Gessel, and S . F . Dice .<br />
1967 . Distribution and cycling of nitrogen ,<br />
phosphorus, potassium and calcium in a<br />
second-growth Douglas-fir ecosystem . In<br />
Primary production and mineral cycling in<br />
natural ecosystems, p. 197-232. Univ.<br />
Maine Press .<br />
Fredriksen, R. L. 1969. A battery powered<br />
proportional streamwater sampler . Wate r<br />
Resour. Res . 5: 1410-1413 .<br />
130
1970. Erosion and sedimentation<br />
following road construction and<br />
timber harvest on unstable soils in three<br />
small western Oregon watersheds. USDA<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Serv. Res. Pap. PNW-104, 15 p . ,<br />
illus. Pac. Northwest <strong>Forest</strong> & Range Exp .<br />
Stn., Portland, Oreg.<br />
1971 . Comparative water quality-natural<br />
and disturbed streams followin g<br />
logging and slash burning . In <strong>Forest</strong> lan d<br />
uses and stream environment, p . 125-137 .<br />
Oreg. State Univ., Corvallis .<br />
Likens, G . E., F . H. Bormann, N . M. Johnson ,<br />
and others . 1970. Effects of forest cuttin g<br />
and herbicide treatment on nutrien t<br />
budgets in the Hubbard Brook Watershedecosystem<br />
. Ecol. Monogr . 40: 23-47 .<br />
McColl, J. G., and D . W . Cole. 1968 . A mechanism<br />
of cation transport in a forest soil .<br />
Northwest Sci . 42 : 134-140 .<br />
Moodie, C . D. 1964 . Nutrient inputs in rain -<br />
fall at nine selected sites in Washington .<br />
Wash . Agric. Exp. Stn., Wash. State Univ.<br />
Paeth, D. C. 1970. Genetic and stability relationships<br />
of four western Cascade soils . 12 6<br />
p. Ph .D . thesis, on file at Oreg . State Univ. ,<br />
Corvallis.<br />
Remezov, N. P., L. N. Bykova, and K. M.<br />
Smirnova. 1955. Nitrogen and mineral<br />
cycles in forests . Akidemiya Nank SSSR.<br />
Trudy Instituta Lesa ., p. 167-194 .<br />
Tarrant, R . F ., K. C. Lu, C . S. Chen, and W.<br />
B. Bollen. 1968. Nitrogen content of precipitation<br />
in a coastal Oregon forest opening.<br />
Tellus XX : 554-556 .<br />
Wilson, A . T. 1959. Organic nitrogen in New<br />
Zealand snows . Nature 183 : 318-319 .<br />
Zavitkovski, J ., and M . Newton . 1968. Ecological<br />
importance of snowbrush ,<br />
Ceanothus velutinus, in the Oregon Cascades<br />
. Ecology 49 : 1134-1145 .<br />
131
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Nutrient cycling in throughf all<br />
and litterfall in 450-year-old<br />
Douglasfir stands<br />
Albert Abee<br />
an d<br />
Denis Lavender<br />
School of <strong>Forest</strong>ry<br />
Oregon State University<br />
Corvallis, Orego n<br />
Abstract<br />
Comparisons of nutrient concentrations (N, P, K+, Ca ++ , Mg++) found in canopy throughfall and litterfall<br />
were made on the H. J. <strong>Andrews</strong> <strong>Experimental</strong> <strong>Forest</strong>. Six old-growth Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii )<br />
stands were studied which represented six forest communities common to the western Cascades ofOregon. These<br />
community types span a large portion of the temperature and moisture gradients present in the area. The<br />
preliminary data indicate that nutrient concentration in throughfall was highest during the summer and fall, and<br />
lowest during the winter. Nutrient input through throughfall generally followed the same trends . Nutrient<br />
return through litterfall was greatest in the needles. More amounts of N, P, and Ca++ were transferred to the soil<br />
through litterfall than through throughfall, while more K + and Mg++ were added to the soil through throughfall.<br />
Litterfall was maximum during the winter. Future studies will correlate the results from the nutrient analysis to<br />
the moisture and temperature gradients .<br />
Introduction<br />
The worldwide interest of scientists in litterfall<br />
production during the past century, has<br />
been shown by Bray and Gorham (1964) i n<br />
their review of litter production in the forest s<br />
of the world. Methodology reports ranged<br />
from utilization of randomly located collection<br />
devices of varied design, separation, oven -<br />
drying, and chemical analysis of several litter<br />
components, to merely raking up and air drying<br />
the litter on a unit area basis. In spite of<br />
the large number of papers cited in the abov e<br />
review, data of litter production from natural ,<br />
old-growth ecosystems are meager. Even less<br />
is known about litterfall in old-growth<br />
Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) forest<br />
types. The examination of seasonal fluctuations,<br />
nutrient concentration changes associated<br />
with defoliation, and nutrient composition<br />
of various litterfall categories are scarce<br />
(Kira and Shidei 1967) .<br />
The first published report of an investigation<br />
of litterfall in coniferous forests of the<br />
Pacific Northwest is that of Tarrant, Isaac ,<br />
and Chandler (1951). These workers collected<br />
the litter of several species for 1 year and estimated<br />
nutrient movement by multiplyin g<br />
litter weight by the percent elemental conten t<br />
of foliage collected from trees, an inexact procedure<br />
. More detailed measurements of th e<br />
nutrient cycle in Douglas-fir forests have bee n<br />
published for stands in New Zealand (Wil l<br />
1959) and the United States (Dimock 1958) .<br />
In addition, workers at both the University o f<br />
Washington (Rahman 1964) and Oregon Stat e<br />
University 1 have collected substantial dat a<br />
describing litterfall in both managed an d<br />
natural Douglas-fir stands . Riekerk and Gessel<br />
(1965) and Cole and Gessel (1968) summariz e<br />
1 D . P . Lavender, unpublished data .<br />
133
a number of very sophisticated studies o f<br />
nutrient movement through Douglas-fir ecosystems<br />
in Washington .<br />
All of the above studies, save that of Tar -<br />
rant et al ., however, were concerned with<br />
litterfall and nutrient movement through relatively<br />
young stands .<br />
Several studies (LeClerc and Breazeal e<br />
1908, Mes 1954, Tukey and Amling 1958 ,<br />
and Tukey et al . 1958) have demonstrated<br />
that rainfall may remove substantial quantities<br />
of nutrient elements from the foliage of<br />
horticultural plants . Similarly, studies of th e<br />
elemental content of precipitation under<br />
forest stands (Tamm 1951, Madgwick an d<br />
Ovington 1959, Will 1959, and Voigt 1960 )<br />
have demonstrated that rainwater which ha s<br />
passed through tree crowns ( "throughfall")<br />
contains significantly higher quantities o f<br />
many nutrient elements than rainfall collected<br />
in adjacent openings .<br />
In the Pacific Northwest, studies reporte d<br />
by Rahman (1964), Tarrant et al . (1968) and<br />
Cole and Gessel (1968) have yielded data<br />
which describe the movement of nutrient s<br />
from the atmosphere and tree crowns to th e<br />
forest floor by precipitation . Finally, unpublished<br />
data by Lavender describe the<br />
movement of nutrients from the crowns of<br />
both fertilized and control second-growth<br />
Douglas-fir stands to the forest floor by<br />
precipitation .<br />
The purpose of the present study was to<br />
measure the movement of nutrients in canop y<br />
throughfall and litterfall in several associatio n<br />
types of old-growth Douglas-fir stands . These<br />
community types were selected to represent<br />
the range of environments occurring on the H .<br />
J. <strong>Andrews</strong> <strong>Experimental</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> and are also<br />
indigenous to the Pacific Northwest. This<br />
paper will report on the results of our efforts<br />
to date .<br />
Study Area<br />
The H . J. <strong>Andrews</strong> <strong>Experimental</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> en -<br />
compasses 15,000 acres and is characterize d<br />
by steep topography with approximately one -<br />
fifth of its land area in gentle slopes o r<br />
benches. Elevations within the forest vary<br />
from 457 m to more than 1,523 m . Precipitation<br />
is heavy, varying from 226 cm per year a t<br />
lower elevations to as much as 356 cm per year<br />
along the highest ridges. A considerable snowpack<br />
develops on the higher slopes while rai n<br />
predominates at the lower elevations. Mean<br />
temperatures within the forest range fro m<br />
35°F in January to 65°F in midsummer<br />
(Berntsen and Rothacher 1959) .<br />
Methods<br />
Within the <strong>Experimental</strong> <strong>Forest</strong>, six communities<br />
were chosen (table 1), each name d<br />
for characteristic plants in both the overstory<br />
and understory . The six old-growth communities<br />
are presented in order of increasing<br />
elevation. Each of the six plots are 0 .2024<br />
hectare in size and are equipped with eight<br />
litter traps ; each is 2,601 cm 2 in area, located<br />
on a random basis in each plot . Litter was<br />
collected every 4 to 6 weeks during the snow -<br />
free months of 1970-71 . Heavy snow pack<br />
prevented litter collection during much of th e<br />
winter of 1970 . Therefore, data describing<br />
nutrient movement in the litter for this perio d<br />
are weak because : (1) the necessarily infrequent<br />
collections do not permit accurat e<br />
assessment of the rate of litterfall, and (2) lit -<br />
ter which remained in the traps for lon g<br />
periods was subjected to leaching . The following<br />
fall, three litter traps on each plot wer e<br />
equipped with a 113-liter reservoir to collec t<br />
the precipitation which passed over the litter .<br />
Analysis of this water will provide a measure<br />
of the nutrients leached from the litter .<br />
Crown and stem maps were made for each<br />
plot to aid in evaluating the variation of litter -<br />
fall between traps .<br />
After collection the litter for each trap wa s<br />
dried at 70°C, separated into classes (needles ,<br />
cones, twigs, branches, hardwoods, bark,<br />
lichens and mosses), and weighed. Prior to<br />
chemical analyses, litter from the eight litter<br />
traps per plot was composited into tw o<br />
samples, each representing four traps . In addition,<br />
some consolidation of litter collected on<br />
different dates was necessary . Each sample<br />
was analyzed to determine the levels of nitrogen,<br />
phosphorus, potassium, calcium an d<br />
134
Table 1.-Characteristics of study plot s<br />
Plot<br />
Elevation<br />
PPT/<br />
year<br />
Percent species<br />
composition )<br />
Diameter<br />
range<br />
Average<br />
d .b.h .<br />
Basa l<br />
area 2<br />
Stems /<br />
hectare<br />
meters centimeters - - - centimeters- - -<br />
1 . Pseudotsuga- 457 211 .8 Psme 89 .3 11 - 163 46 .7 83 .06 27 7<br />
Holodiscus Tsme 5 . 4<br />
Tabr 3 . 6<br />
Acci 1 . 7<br />
2 . Tsuga- 488 228 .3 Psme 17 .0 8 - 139 37 .8 97 .55 494<br />
Rhododendron- Tsme 69 . 0<br />
Berberis Tabr 8 . 0<br />
Thpl 5 . 0<br />
Conu 1 . 0<br />
3 . Tsuga- 762 230 .6 Psme 26 .5 10 - 213 68 .1 120 .87 168<br />
Polystichum Tsme 61 . 8<br />
Tabr 8 . 8<br />
Thpl 2 . 9<br />
4 . Tsuga - 610 229 .6 Psme 52 .8 8 - 157 34 .0 69 .77 45 0<br />
Rhododendron - Tsme 23 . 1<br />
Gaultheria Tabr 1 . 1<br />
Thpl 19 . 8<br />
Cach 2 . 2<br />
Conu 1 . 1<br />
5 . Tsuga-Abies- 975 Psme 16 .1 8 - 173 66 .3 129 .60 27 7<br />
Linneae Tsme 46 . 4<br />
Thpl 33 . 9<br />
Tabr 3 . 6<br />
6 . Abies- 1,311 Psme 46 .3 8 - 117 55 .4 109 .63 33 1<br />
Tiarella Tsme 16 . 4<br />
Abam<br />
Abpr<br />
37 .3<br />
1 Psme Pseudo tsuga menziesi i<br />
Tsme Tsuga mertensiana<br />
Tabr Taxus brevifolia<br />
Acci Acer circina turn<br />
Thpl Thuja plicat a<br />
Conu Cornus nutalli i<br />
Cach Castanopsis chrysophylla<br />
Abam Abies amabilis<br />
Abpr Abies procera<br />
2 Square meters/hectare .<br />
135
magnesium.<br />
In addition to the litter traps, each plot was<br />
equipped with- four 20-inch-high rain gages .<br />
Each gage was assigned to one of 20 rando m<br />
locations within the plot after each collection ,<br />
in accordance with a method described b y<br />
Wilm (1943). Higher elevation plots als o<br />
contain a rain gage on a platform 10 feet fro m<br />
ground level to provide a water sample durin g<br />
months of heavy snow cover . Water was collected<br />
and the volume measured at approximately<br />
2-week intervals . The samples wer e<br />
returned to the laboratory on the day of<br />
collection, filtered, and stored at -12°C unti l<br />
thawed for analysis. For analysis, the fou r<br />
samples per plot were combined into tw o<br />
samples and analyzed for total potassium ,<br />
calcium, magnesium, orthophosphate, an d<br />
total phosphorus. Nitrogen in the form of<br />
ammonium, nitrate, nitrite, and organic nitrogen<br />
was also determined .<br />
Precautions were taken to keep contamination<br />
of water samples to a minimum . Funnel s<br />
with glass wool stoppers were provided for<br />
each rain gage to keep organic matter fro m<br />
contaminating water samples . Mercuric chloride<br />
was added to the rain gages in the summer<br />
and fall to keep microorganism activity<br />
to a minimum . The cold temperature helpe d<br />
to reduce microorganism and insect activit y<br />
during the winter .<br />
Several techniques were investigated in an<br />
effort to arrive at a measure of crown density .<br />
Basal area and volume poorly describe intercepting<br />
crown cover in old-growth defectiv e<br />
stands as canopy development tends to re -<br />
main constant after trees reach maturity ;<br />
hence, direct estimates were used . Photo -<br />
graphs which were taken above each samplin g<br />
point with a 35-mm camera were shown over<br />
a spherical dot grid to give a means of comparing<br />
crown densities .<br />
(fig. 1). Water sample concentrations were<br />
highest during the summer when precipitatio n<br />
was minimal (table 2) . Concentrations were<br />
lowest during the winter when precipitatio n<br />
was highest. As precipitation decreased fro m<br />
winter to spring, concentration of throughfal l<br />
samples for each element increased . Throughfall<br />
concentrations were also high during th e<br />
fall when precipitation first starts .<br />
Unlike N, the average total input of P ,<br />
Mg+, Ca++, and K+ generally follows the<br />
same trend as did the concentration curves<br />
(fig. 2). The greatest amount of each element<br />
was leached out during the fall when precipitation<br />
first washes the canopy . Decreasin g<br />
amounts were leached out with increasin g<br />
precipitation . Potassium input reached a lo w<br />
point during the winter, at which time 68 per -<br />
cent of the total precipitation had fallen, an d<br />
z<br />
0<br />
I-<br />
2<br />
CC<br />
I-<br />
z<br />
w<br />
U<br />
z<br />
0<br />
U<br />
0<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
Throughfall Results<br />
Nutrient concentration in throughfall<br />
samples for plots 1 through 4 for all elements<br />
appeared to be the same during each season<br />
FALL<br />
Figure 1 . Average concentration of plots 1 through 4<br />
for each element by season .<br />
0<br />
136
Z<br />
w<br />
2<br />
w<br />
J<br />
w<br />
3<br />
0<br />
Table 2. Average total precipitation increased sharply from winter to spring ,<br />
across all plots by season slightly decreasing from spring to summer .<br />
Season<br />
Precipitation<br />
Calcium and P reached low points during th e<br />
spring, at which time 92 percent of the tota l<br />
pre pitation had allen, and increased fro m<br />
spring to summer. Magnesium input was great -<br />
centimeters<br />
est from fall to winter and remained approximately<br />
the same from winter to summer.<br />
Fall<br />
70.89<br />
Nitrogen input slightly increased from fall to<br />
winter, decreasing from winter to sprin g<br />
Winter<br />
92 .0 5<br />
reaching a low point during the summer .<br />
There appears to be no difference in term s<br />
Spring<br />
57.9 6<br />
of net kg per hectare per year between plot s<br />
1 to 4 for each element with the exception o f<br />
Summer<br />
18 .0 8<br />
plot 3 (table 3) . Plot 3 had more K + and les s<br />
Ca++ than plots 1, 2, and 4 .<br />
Total 238 .98<br />
100<br />
8 0<br />
20<br />
Figure 2. Total average kg per hectare of plots 1<br />
through 4 for each element by season .<br />
Throughfall Discussion<br />
In general, the total nutrient input an d<br />
throughfall concentrations were highest in th e<br />
summer and fall and lowest during the winte r<br />
and spring months. This seems to indicate<br />
that each tree or canopy has a constant fraction<br />
of elements which can be removed fro m<br />
the foliage through leaching elements . Once<br />
the rains start in the fall, the majority of eac h<br />
nutrient is leached out . As the rains increase<br />
in quantity and duration during the winter<br />
• and spring months, the available fraction of<br />
nutrients is further depleted. Decreasing<br />
precipitation from spring to the end of summer<br />
allows the nutrient fraction to increase<br />
•<br />
again until the total fraction of leachabl e<br />
nutrients is reached .<br />
Variations found between plot 3 and plot s<br />
1, 2, and 4 with respect to K + and Ca++ coul d<br />
be due to differences in soil types (data no t<br />
available yet) . If soil types are different with<br />
respect to nutrient availability, the difference s<br />
between plots could be explained by luxur y<br />
consumption .<br />
Another possible source of the nitroge n<br />
found in the throughfall samples is nitrogen -<br />
fixing bacteria . Jones (1970) in his study o f<br />
nitrogen fixation by bacteria in the phyllo -<br />
sphere of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga douglasii)<br />
in England isolated bacteria from the leaf<br />
surfaces of Douglas-fir. He found that th e<br />
bacteria could fix atmospheric nitrogen whe n<br />
provided with a carbohydrate source . The fat e<br />
13 7
Table 3 .-Net kg per hectare per year of nutrients collected in throughfall gages<br />
++ Mg++<br />
Item N P K + Ca<br />
Input from atmosphere ) 1 .298 0 .232 0 .106 2 .085 1 .27 3<br />
Throughfall input :<br />
Plot 1<br />
3 .999 2 .308 17 .416 5 .983 2.608<br />
2 2 .979 2 .398 15 .749 4 .438 2 .08 6<br />
3 3 .729 2 .970 30 .350 2 .134 1 .45 6<br />
4 2 .710 3.283 23 .379 5 .104 2 .34 3<br />
Average 3 .354 2 .740 21 .724 4 .416 2 .123<br />
1 Fredriksen unpublished data-data collected from open area on the H . J . <strong>Andrews</strong> <strong>Experimental</strong> Fores t<br />
at 610 meters .<br />
Table 4 .-Distribution of metric tons/hectare between litter components by plo t<br />
Plot 1 2 3 4 5a 5b 1 6 Average 2<br />
Needles 2 .002 2 .246 2 .950 3 .200 2 .533 2 .533 3 .741 2 .77 7<br />
Percent of total 32 .84 35 .56 46 .44 62 .30 15 .17 55 .91 54 .10 47 .1 5<br />
Reproductiv e<br />
structures .834 1 .141 1 .284 .742 .536 .536 .518 .74 3<br />
Percent of total 13 .68 18 .06 20.22 14 .46 3 .20 11 .83 7 .49 14 .3 1<br />
Wood material 2 .280 2 .760 1 .876 1 .009 13 .479 1 .267 2 .524 1 .95 3<br />
Percent of total 37 .40 43 .68 29 .53 19 .66 80 .74 27 .96 36 .50 33.1 4<br />
Hardwoods and<br />
mosses 1 .022 .175 .401 .197 .195 .195 .206 .36 5<br />
Percent of total 16 .77 2 .77 6 .32 3 .84 1 .17 4 .30 2 .98 6 .2 0<br />
Total 6 .138 6 .317 6 .512 5 .131 16 .694 4.530 6 .916 5 .89 1<br />
Note : In plot 5, an extremely large slab of bark from a nearby snag fell into a trap causing high values for tota l<br />
tons/hectare . Over a longer period of time, this type of variation between litter components can be expected to<br />
occur randomly throughout each plot . However, due to the limited sampling time thus far recorded, the one<br />
extreme value will be temporarily ignored .<br />
1 Excluding extreme bark sample .<br />
2 Excluding 5a .<br />
138
of the nitrogen was not determined. However ,<br />
Jones suggested that it could be washed to th e<br />
ground .<br />
Litterfall Dat a<br />
Despite the differences in stand characteristics<br />
shown in table 1, little variation in total<br />
litter production was found among stands fo r<br />
the year 1970-71 (table 4) . Average yearl y<br />
litterfall production for all plots was 5 .8 9<br />
metric tons/hectare . This is approximately 1 %<br />
times the average 3 .5 metric tons per hectare<br />
reported by Bray and Gorham (1964) fo r<br />
cool, temperate forests, but closer to the yiel d<br />
they reported for a latitude comparable t o<br />
their study area (fig . 1). From worldwid e<br />
data, these authors reported that nonlea f<br />
litter averaged from 27 percent to 31 percent<br />
of total litter production . The stands reported<br />
here averaged 47 percent nonleaf (woody )<br />
litter for the 1-year period .<br />
In terms of total kg/hectare of litter, the<br />
vast majority fell during the winter (fig . 3) .<br />
This is the period when snowfall is greatest ,<br />
consequently much litter breaks under th e<br />
1600<br />
1400<br />
1200<br />
weight of the snow . Needle cast was greatest<br />
in the fall, decreasing during the winter, an d<br />
gradually increasing during spring . Hardwoo d<br />
and moss litter was greatest in the fall, de -<br />
creasing throughout the rest of the year .<br />
Woody material and cone litterfall was greatest<br />
during the winter.<br />
Nutrient concentration of litterfall components<br />
varied considerably among plots an d<br />
seasons (table 5). Plots 1 and 3 were chosen<br />
to represent the range of values that can be<br />
found in nutrient return through litterfall .<br />
There appears to be no consistent trend b y<br />
season or plot for the litter component concentrations.<br />
However, average yearly concentrations<br />
of each nutrient for each litter clas s<br />
are comparable between plots 1 and 3 . There<br />
is a substantial difference between tota l<br />
kg/hectare for N, P, K +, and Ca++ betwee n<br />
plots (table 6). Plot 1 had more kg of Ca ++<br />
per hectare than did plot 3 . Plot 3 had greate r<br />
amounts of N, P, and K + than did plot 1 .<br />
Little difference occurred among plots fo r<br />
Mg++<br />
The greatest portion of nutrient inpu t<br />
through litterfall came in the needles (tabl e<br />
7). Needle litterfall contributed about 54 per -<br />
cent of the total nutrient input . Cone litterfall<br />
accounted for 13 percent while twig litterfall<br />
accounted for 11 percent of the total . Together,<br />
the needle, cone, and twig litterfall<br />
account for 78 percent of the total nutrien t<br />
input through litterfall .<br />
Litterfall Discussio n<br />
40 0<br />
200<br />
Figure 3 . Average kg per hectare by season and litter<br />
component .<br />
Variations in nutrient concentration foun d<br />
between litterfall components among plot s<br />
and season can be expected if foliage characteristics<br />
such as age and species are no t<br />
constant . We also observed that the age of th e<br />
tissue, and when it falls, varies throughout th e<br />
year for each plot. This is primarily due to<br />
environmental parameters such as win d<br />
action, rainstorms, and snowfall . Difference s<br />
in soil types could also have affected concentrations<br />
.<br />
Differences between total nutrient inpu t<br />
through litterfall (table 6) are affected by th e<br />
distribution of litter components within th e<br />
total. Where two plots seem to produce corn -<br />
139
Table 5.-Average percent of N, P, K +, Ca ++, and Mg++ by season, plot, and litter componen t<br />
Litte r<br />
component<br />
and season<br />
Plot 1 Plot 3<br />
N P K + Ca ++ Mg++ N P K+ Ca ++ Mg+ +<br />
Needles :<br />
Fall 0 .368 0 .087 0 .109 1 .901 0 .017 0 .434 0 .120 0 .161 1 .815 0 .02 0<br />
Winter .691 .108 .210 1 .305 .018 .763 .124 .280 1 .103 .08 1<br />
Spring .462 .124 .159 1 .241 .028 .717 .119 .103 1 .112 .01 7<br />
Summer .467 .143 .200 1 .740 .034 .474 .105 .145 1 .286 .02 5<br />
Average .497 .115 .169 1 .546 .024 .597 .117 .172 1 .329 .02 0<br />
Cones :<br />
Fall .530 .084 .122 .397 .045 .518 .063. .099 .149 .01 5<br />
Winter .294 .029 .046 .146 .016 .387 .033 .051 .148 .01 1<br />
Spring .488 .049 .133 .214 .041 .544 .064 .102 .178 .01 1<br />
Summer .487 .068 .151 .369 .027 .561 .063 .159 .206 .01 6<br />
Average .449 .057 .105 .281 .032 .502 .055 .103 .170 .01 3<br />
Twigs :<br />
Fall .340 .033 .051 .852 .009 .434 .051 .124 1 .107 .01 6<br />
Winter .375 .040 .057 1 .261 .011 .398 .032 .075 1 .110 .01 2<br />
Spring .424 .072 .076 .999 .081 .358 .047 .046 .823 .00 8<br />
Summer _ .408 .043 .105 1 .034 .013 .363 .055 .102 1 .054 .01 5<br />
Average .386 .047 .072 1,036 .013 .388 .046 .086 1 .023 .01 3<br />
Branches :<br />
Fall .218 .017 .030 .713 .008 .207 .013 .025 .522 .00 6<br />
Winter .028 .017 .080 .598 .006 .296 .039 .082 .843 .01 0<br />
Sprin g<br />
Summer .102 .008 .030 .338 .00 5<br />
Average .213 .017 .055 .655 .007 .201 .020 .046 .567 .00 7<br />
Bark :<br />
Fall .332 .047 .076 .566 .014 .417 .038 .074 .517 .01 0<br />
Winter .404 .033 .050 .963 .010 .431 .035 .057 .413 .009<br />
Spring - _ .476 .080 .055 .300 .00 9<br />
Summer .320 .030 .051 .637 .011 .541 .056 .163 .474 .01 2<br />
Average .352 .036 .059 .722 .011 .466 .052 .087 .426 .01 0<br />
Hardwoods :<br />
Fall .630 .095 .167 2 .395 .037 .591 .124 .475 2 .428 .06 1<br />
Winte r<br />
Sprin g<br />
Summer .546 .092 .302 2 .127 .07 0<br />
Average .588 .094 .234 2 .261 .053 .591 .124 .475 2 .428 .06 1<br />
Mosses and lichens :<br />
Fall .417 .053 .117 .408 .016 .659 .126 .229 .413 .01 9<br />
Winter 1 .264 .100 .132 .567 .015 1 .234 .122 .350 .329 .01 7<br />
Spring - - -- _ - - - -<br />
Summer 1 .313 .100 .246 .376 .020 1 .427 .130 .284 .364 .01 8<br />
Average .998 .084 .165 .450 .017 1 .106 .126 .287 .368 .018<br />
140
Table 6. Total kg per hectare per year for plots 1 and 3 for each element by litter class<br />
Litter class<br />
Plot 1 Plot 3<br />
N P K+ Ca ++ Mg++ N P K + Ca ++ Mg+ +<br />
Needles 7 .93 2 .27 3 .16 35 .89 0 .47 15 .61 3 .82 5 .89 44 .08 0 .6 5<br />
Percent of total 36.12 58 .85 49 .54 50 .22 44 .61 47 .76 68 .20 60 .25 69 .90 59 .7 9<br />
Cones 3 .46 .45 .83 2 .06 2 .13 6 .60 .69 1 .33 2 .05 .1 7<br />
Percent of total 15 .74 11 .59 13 .03 2 .89 20 .31 20 .23 12 .40 13 .63 3 .24 15 .4 6<br />
Branches 1 .97 .16 .74 5 .09 .06 .82 .12 .29 2 .15 .0 2<br />
Percent of total 8 .98 4 .06 11 .56 7 .13 5 .28 2 .50 2 .00 2 .97 3 .40 2 .0 6<br />
Twigs 3 .52 .38 .66 12 .01 .10 3 .54 .34 .75 9 .56 .1 0<br />
Percent of total 16.07 9.86 10 .33 16 .79 9 .50 10 .82 6 .20 7 .67 15 .15 9 .2 7<br />
Bark 1 .62 .11 .07 3 .56 .30 3 .00 .28 .49 3 .18 .0 6<br />
Percent of total 7 .39 3 .17 3.08 4 .97 2 .92 9 .18 5 .00 5 .04 5 .03 5 .1 5<br />
Hardwoods 2 .33 .39 .67 12 .48 .17 .38 .06 .11 1 .51 .0 5<br />
Percent of total 10 .60 9 .17 10 .49 17 .46 16 .06 1 .16 1 .00 1 .14 2 .39 4 .1 2<br />
Moss and lichens 1 .12 .08 .12 .39 .01 2 .73 .28 .90 .54 .0 3<br />
Percent of total 5 .10 2 .11 1 .98 .54 1 .32 8 .35 5 .00 9 .16 .85 3 .0 9<br />
Total 21 .95 3 .86 6 .39 71 .49 1 .07 32 .68 5 .59 9 .77 63 .06 1 .09<br />
Table 7.-Average percent of litterfall totals for plots 1 and 3 for each element by litter class<br />
Litter class N P K + Ca ++ Mg++ Average<br />
Needles 41 .9 63.5 54 .9 60 .1 52 .2 54 .5 2<br />
Cones 18 .0 12 .0 13 .3 3 .1 17 .9 12.8 6<br />
Branches 5 .7 3 .0 7 .3 5 .3 3 .7 5 .0 0<br />
Twigs 13 .4 8 .0 9 .0 16 .0 9 .4 11 .1 6<br />
Bark 8 .3 4 .1 4 .1 5 .0 4 .0 5 .1 0<br />
Hardwoods 5 .9 5 .1 5 .8 9 .9 10 .1 7 .3 6<br />
Moss and lichens 6 .7 3 .6 5 .6 .7 2 .2 3 .7 6<br />
r<br />
14 1
parable total quantities of litter on a yearly<br />
basis, amounts of the various litter components<br />
are important . The amounts of each<br />
litter component are important becaus e<br />
concentrations of nutrient elements vary fo r<br />
each litter component (see table 5) . Table 4<br />
shows that the greatest differences betwee n<br />
plots 1 and 3 in terms of kg/hectare of litter -<br />
fall occur between needles and woody material.<br />
Plot 3 produced 947 kg/hectare more of<br />
needles than plot 1, while plot 1 produced<br />
403 kg/hectare more of woody material tha n<br />
plot 3. However, table 5 shows that th e<br />
average concentration of nitrogen, fo r<br />
example, is much higher in needles than it is<br />
in woody material ; consequently, variations<br />
such as found in table 6 are brought about .<br />
Nutrient input in both throughfall and litterfall<br />
appears to have the same trend for K + ,<br />
P, and Ca++ when comparing plots 1 and 3 .<br />
The litterfall analysis shows plot 3 havin g<br />
more K +, P, and less Ca ++ than plot 1 . Th e<br />
throughfall data for plots 1 and 3 show th e<br />
same results (table 3) . However, differences<br />
between N and Mg++ input through throughfall<br />
and litterfall for each plot do not agree .<br />
Table 3 shows little difference in N input fo r<br />
each plot, while table 6 shows N being highe r<br />
in plot 3 . A possible explanation for this ha s<br />
been given in the preceding paragraph . Tabl e<br />
3 shows that plot 1 had more Mg ++ input<br />
than plot 3 . Litterfall input for Mg ++ was<br />
about the same between plot 1 and 3 . A<br />
possible explanation for the difference between<br />
plots 1 and 3 for Mg++ in throughfall<br />
might be that the hardwood litterfall ac -<br />
counted for 10.1 percent of the total Mg ++<br />
input (table 7) . Table 1 shows that 1 .7 per -<br />
cent of the species composition in plot 1 wa s<br />
hardwoods, while plot 3 shows no hardwoods .<br />
More amounts of N, P, and Ca ++ were<br />
transferred to the soil through litterfall tha n<br />
through throughfall ; while more K + and Mg ++<br />
were added to the soil through throughfal l<br />
(table 8) .<br />
There appeared to be no relationship between<br />
nutrient concentration and elevation .<br />
Rather, concentration on each plot seemed t o<br />
be correlated with crown density . Basal are a<br />
and crown density in old-growth Douglas-fi r<br />
stands seem to be distributed randomly ove r<br />
the sites on the H . J. <strong>Andrews</strong> <strong>Experimental</strong><br />
<strong>Forest</strong>. Consequently, no real correlatio n<br />
could be seen between basal area and crow n<br />
density with moisture and elevation . Thi s<br />
could also be due to the fact that the range o f<br />
environments sampled on the H . J. <strong>Andrews</strong><br />
<strong>Experimental</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> was not great enough ,<br />
indicated by total precipitation . Table 1<br />
shows that there was no real difference i n<br />
total precipitation between plots 1 through 4 .<br />
Summary<br />
The preliminary data indicate that nutrien t<br />
concentration in throughfall varied with sea -<br />
son . Highest concentrations were found in th e<br />
summer and lowest concentrations during th e<br />
winter. Nutrient input through throughfal l<br />
generally followed the same trends as di d<br />
nutrient concentrations . Nutrient return<br />
through litterfall was greatest in the needles .<br />
Together, the needles, twigs, and cones ac -<br />
counted for 78 percent of the nutrient inpu t<br />
Table 8.-Total nutrient input in kg per hectare per yea r<br />
Input N P K + Ca ++ Mg++<br />
Average throughfall input 3 .3544 2 .740 21 .7230 4 .416 2.12 3<br />
Average litterfall input 27 .3235 4 .725 8 .0784 67 .2738 1 .08 0<br />
Total 30 .6779 7 .465 29 .8014 71 .6888 3 .203<br />
142
through litterfall . More amounts of N, P, and<br />
Ca++ were transferred to the soil throug h<br />
litterfall than through throughfall, while mor e<br />
K+ and Mg++ were added to the soil through<br />
throughfall. Litterfall was maximum during<br />
the winter .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The work reported in this paper was supported<br />
in part by National Science Foundation<br />
Grant No . GB-20963 to the Coniferous<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Biome, U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems ,<br />
International Biological Program . This is Contribution<br />
No. 30 to the Coniferous Fores t<br />
Biome .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Berntsen, C. M., and J . Rothacher . 1959 . A<br />
guide to the H . J. <strong>Andrews</strong> Experimenta l<br />
<strong>Forest</strong>. USDA <strong>Forest</strong> Serv . Pac. Northwes t<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> & Range Exp . Stn ., 21 p . Portland ,<br />
Oreg .<br />
Bray, J. Roger, and Eville Gorham . 1964 .<br />
Litter production in forests of the world .<br />
Advan. Ecol. Res . 2: 101-157 .<br />
Cole, Dale W ., and Stanley P. Gessel. 1968 .<br />
Cedar River Research . A program for<br />
studying the pathways, rates, and processes<br />
of elemental cycling in a forest ecosystem .<br />
Univ . Wash., Coll . <strong>Forest</strong> Res ., Inst. <strong>Forest</strong><br />
Prod. Contrib. No . 4, 54 p .<br />
Dimock, E . J. 1958 . Litter fall in a young<br />
stand of Douglas-fir. Northwest Sci . 32 :<br />
19-29 .<br />
Jones, K. 1970. Nitrogen fixation in th e<br />
phyllosphere of the Douglas-fir, (Pseudotsuga<br />
douglasii) . Ann. Bot. (London) 34 :<br />
239-244 .<br />
Kira, T ., and T. Shidei . 1967 . Primary production<br />
and turnover of organic matter in different<br />
forest ecosystems of the wester n<br />
Pacific. Jap . J. Ecol. 17(2) : 70-87 .<br />
Le Clerc, J. A., and J. F. Breazeale . 1908 .<br />
Plant food removed from growing plants by<br />
rain or dew . In J . A. Arnold (ed.), U .S .<br />
Department of Agriculture yearbook, p .<br />
389-402 .<br />
Madgwick, H. A. I., and J. D. Ovington . 1959 .<br />
The chemical composition of precipitatio n<br />
in adjacent forest and open plots . <strong>Forest</strong>ry<br />
32(1) : 14-22 .<br />
Mes, Margaretha G . 1954. Excretion (recretion)<br />
of phosphorus and other mineral elements<br />
by leaves under the influence of rain .<br />
S. Afr . J . Sci. 50(7) : 167-172 .<br />
Rahman, Abu Hamed Mohammed Mojibur .<br />
1964 . A study of the movement of elements<br />
from leaf crowns by natural litter -<br />
fall, stemflow and leaf wash . 119 p . M.F .<br />
thesis on file, Univ . Wash ., Seattle .<br />
Riekerk, Hans, and Stanley P . Gessel. 1965 .<br />
Mineral cycling in a Douglas-fir fores t<br />
stand . Health Phys . 11 : 1363-1369 .<br />
Rothacher, Jack. 1963 . Net precipitation<br />
under a Douglas-fir forest . <strong>Forest</strong> Sci . 9(4) :<br />
423-429 .<br />
Tamm, Carl O. 1951. Removal of plant nutrients<br />
from tree crowns by rain . Physiol .<br />
Plant. (4): 184-188 .<br />
Tarrant, R . F., Leo A. Isaac, and Robert F .<br />
Chandler, Jr . 1951. Observations on litte r<br />
fall and foliage nutrient content of som e<br />
Pacific Northwest tree species . J. For .<br />
49(12) : 914-915 .<br />
, K . C. Lu, C . S. Chen, and W . B .<br />
Bollen. 1968. Nitrogen content of precipitation<br />
in a coastal Oregon forest opening .<br />
Tellus 20(3) : 554-556 .<br />
Tukey, H . B., Jr., and H. J. Amling . 1958 .<br />
Leaching of foliage by rain and dew as an<br />
explanation of differences in the nutrien t<br />
composition of greenhouse and field-grown<br />
plants. Mich. Quart. Bull. 40(4) : 876-881 .<br />
, H. B. Tukey, and S. H. Wittwer.<br />
1958. Loss of nutrients by folia r<br />
leaching as determined by radioisotopes .<br />
Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 71 : 496-506 .<br />
Voigt, G. K. 1960. Alternation of the composition<br />
of rainwater by trees. Am . Midland<br />
Nat . 63(2) : 321-326 .<br />
Will, G . M. 1959. Nutrient return in litter an d<br />
rainfall under some exotic conifer stands i n<br />
New Zealand . New Zealand J. Agric. Res.<br />
2 : 719-734 .<br />
Wilm, H . G. 1943. Determining net rainfal l<br />
under a conifer forest . J. Agric. Res. 67 :<br />
501-512 .<br />
143
Estimating Biomass<br />
and Other State Variables<br />
145
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 1972 .<br />
Direct, nondestructive measurement of<br />
biomass and structure in living,<br />
old-growth Douglas-fir<br />
William C . Denison,<br />
Diane M . Tracy ,<br />
Frederick M . Rhoade s<br />
Department of Botan y<br />
and Plant Pathology<br />
Oregon State University<br />
Corvallis, Orego n<br />
Martha Sherwood<br />
Department of Biolog y<br />
University of Orego n<br />
Eugene, Orego n<br />
Abstract<br />
Previous studies of biomass and structure of Douglas-fir have examined trees less than 100 years old. This<br />
paper describes methods for measuring older trees, illustrated by data from a tree 60 m tall and 450 years old.<br />
Rock climbing techniques, modified for use on trees, are employed to climb the main trunk . A movable spa r<br />
provides access to lateral branches. The trunk is measured, the position of each branch system is located on it ,<br />
and the branch systems are scored for 10 variables related to biomass and structure. An importance value,<br />
calculated for each branch system, is used in selecting a set of branch systems for detailed measurement. The<br />
data permit diagramatic reconstruction of the tree, or estimates of the distribution or total amount of component<br />
parts .<br />
Introduction<br />
The techniques described in this paper are<br />
of two kinds ; technical climbing methods an d<br />
methods of tree description and measuremen t<br />
which depend upon technical climbing to pro -<br />
vide access to the top of the tree . In combination,<br />
these techniques are designed to provid e<br />
quantitative descriptions of the biomass, surface<br />
area, and spatial distribution of th e<br />
aboveground parts of individual trees .<br />
The climbing techniques developed from a<br />
National Science Foundation-Undergraduate<br />
Research Participation study of epiphytes o n<br />
old-growth Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga<br />
menziesii) . Previous studies (Coleman, Muenscher,<br />
and Charles 1956; Hoffman and Kazmierski<br />
1969) were limited to epiphytes<br />
within 2 m of the ground, but this study wa s<br />
designed to study the canopy populations a s<br />
well. An initial attempt to use felled trees wa s<br />
unsuccessful because the surface of the trun k<br />
which hit the ground was destroyed and th e<br />
branch systems with their epiphytes wer e<br />
shattered and scattered . The climbing techniques<br />
were developed as an alternative an d<br />
proved to be practical, effective, and<br />
economical .<br />
Five old-growth Douglas-firs have bee n<br />
rigged and climbed to date, but only one has<br />
been subjected to the measurement and analysis<br />
described herein. Previous studies of biomass<br />
in this species (Burger 1935 ; Newbol d<br />
1967 ; Reukema 1961) have been limited t o<br />
trees less than 100 years old, but the tree s<br />
used in our study are 450 years old and large ;<br />
147
60-80 m tall, 1-1 .5-m dbh, with their lowest<br />
branches 12-25 m above the ground .<br />
Climbing trees of this height is dangerous .<br />
A fall would probably be fatal . But probably<br />
there is greater danger of injury to personnel<br />
under the tree in the event equipment or part s<br />
of branch systems are accidentally dropped<br />
upon them . We have worked through two sea -<br />
sons without injury .<br />
The climbing techniques are described in<br />
detail to permit others to adopt them . Th e<br />
rock-climbing techniques on which they are<br />
based are described in books on mountaineering<br />
(Blackshaw 1970 ; Manning 1967) but may<br />
be unfamiliar to biologists .<br />
The access technique, the methods o f<br />
description and measurement, and one application<br />
of the data, a diagramatic reconstruction<br />
of a tree, are treated in this paper .<br />
Another paper in this symposium (Pike et al .<br />
1972) describes the estimation of tree surfac e<br />
area and epiphyte biomass .<br />
Riggin g<br />
Rigging involves an initial ascent and preparation<br />
of the tree for subsequent climbing .<br />
The ascent is slow, and requires exceptiona l<br />
agility and endurance . A team of three experienced<br />
climbers should rig the tallest trees i n<br />
a day and a half .<br />
The procedure used in ascending the tre e<br />
and placing climbing and belay ropes is outlined<br />
in figures 1-4 .<br />
1<br />
Figure 1 . A lag screw is used to fasten a steel hanger<br />
to the tree .<br />
The Access Techniques<br />
Access to the tree involves three steps : rigging,<br />
climbing, and use of the spar, eac h<br />
described below. Rigging and climbing techniques<br />
are modified from direct-aid rock -<br />
climbing techniques . Basic safety procedures ,<br />
equipment, terminology, and philosophy hav e<br />
been adopted from mountaineering . Anyone<br />
without prior mountaineering experience who<br />
expects to adopt these techniques should consult<br />
one of the standard texts (Blackshaw<br />
1970; Manning 1967) . The specialized rope<br />
and hardware may be obtained from either<br />
mountaineering or yachting suppliers .<br />
Basic equipment for all climbers includes :<br />
hard hat, heavy climbing shoes, and a harnes s<br />
of nylon webbing to which a belay rope i s<br />
attached. The climber is always belayed-tha t<br />
is, she is protected by a safety rope held b y<br />
another experienced climber . Climbing an d<br />
belay ropes are 11 mm nylon "goldline" an d<br />
the webbing used in making slings, stirrups ,<br />
etc . is of nylon and 40-50 mm wide .<br />
Figure 2 . A carabiner is clipped into the hanger .<br />
148
Figure 3. Two additional carabiners are used to faste n<br />
two climbing stirrups to the first carabiner. (Only<br />
the upper ends of the webbing stirrups are shown . )<br />
The belay rope is clipped through the carabiner .<br />
5<br />
Figure 4 . The climber ascends the climbing stirrup s<br />
until the first carabiner is at her waist . Tension on<br />
the belay rope holds her in position while sh e<br />
drives the next lag screw .<br />
6<br />
Figure 5 . The climbing rope is fastened to the tree b y<br />
four lag screws, hangers, and carabiners . A loop, Figure 6 . The belay rope runs through a block hun g<br />
tied near the end of the rope, is connected to the by heavy chain with welded links. The chain i s<br />
carabiners by two loops of webbing. The free end fastened around the tree above a limb and secure d<br />
of the rope is tied around the tree using a bowline . by two 1-cm bolts with washers and lock nuts .<br />
149
Lag screws, 8 by 150 mm, are used t o<br />
attach equipment. They do not sag or "work<br />
out" of the thick, soft bark of Douglas-fir as<br />
nails do . The screws are driven with a hammer<br />
but may be tightened or removed with a<br />
wrench .<br />
A climbing rope is attached near the top of<br />
the tree and subsequent ascents are made on<br />
this fixed rope . Figure 5 illustrates the usual<br />
method of attachment.<br />
The block for the belay line is attached<br />
below the point at which the climb path i s<br />
obstructed by branches. In climbing abov e<br />
this point the belay rope is carried up throug h<br />
carabiners placed during rigging . Below th e<br />
block, on the open trunk, the climber is belayed<br />
from above through the block . Figure 6<br />
illustrates the method of attachment for th e<br />
block .<br />
Climbing<br />
Climbing requires mastery of unfamiliar<br />
skills, but no greater strength or agility tha n<br />
climbing a ladder, a 70-m ladder . An experienced<br />
climber, in good physical condition ,<br />
can climb a 75-m tree in 20 minutes or less ,<br />
depending upon the distribution of branche s<br />
and the lean of the trunk. A clumsy, middleaged<br />
man can clamber up with equal safety ,<br />
but it takes longer .<br />
The techniques involved in climbing th e<br />
fixed rope are illustrated in figures 7-13 .<br />
7<br />
8 9<br />
Figure 7 . A band of rubber cut from a motorcycle<br />
innertube is fastened around the sling and over the<br />
toe of the boot to prevent the climber from accidentally<br />
stepping out of the sling .<br />
Figure 8 . When weight is placed on the jumar, it s<br />
toothed gate grips the rope so that the jumar ca n<br />
move neither up nor down .<br />
Figure 9 . When there is no weight on the jumar, it s<br />
gate may be lowered and the jumar moved up or<br />
down the rope .<br />
Figure 10. The jumar cannot be removed from th e<br />
rope unless the safety catch is depressed to permit<br />
the gate to open fully .<br />
150
1 1<br />
Figure 11 . The climber places her weight on on e<br />
foot, thus locking the jumar on that side, while sh e<br />
moves the other jumar up or down . She ascends or<br />
descends by shifting her weight from one foot t o<br />
the other and moving the opposing jumars. Sh e<br />
stands in webbing slings which hang from th e<br />
jumars . The jumars are connected to each other by<br />
a short length of rope which passes through a carabiner<br />
clipped to her belay harness .<br />
Figures 12 and 13. At those points at which th e<br />
climbing rope is fastened by a carabiner, th e<br />
jumars must be disconnected from the rope, one at<br />
a time, and moved around the carabiner .<br />
Most of the carabiners used in rigging ar e<br />
removed once the tree is rigged, but a few ar e<br />
left in place to prevent the climbing rop e<br />
from hanging away from the trunk .<br />
Shouted instructions from climber to belayer<br />
are normally adequate during climbing ,<br />
but once the climber enters the canopy conversation<br />
is severely impeded by distance an d<br />
intervening foliage . A pair of small radi o<br />
transceivers facilitates longer communication s<br />
and permits the belayer to record data dictated<br />
by the climber .<br />
The Spar<br />
Use of a special boom, hereafter called "the<br />
spar," permits the climber to reach any point<br />
within 4 m of the trunk .<br />
The spar is specially constructed of three<br />
lengths of mast-grade spruce laminated in a<br />
"tee" cross section. It is 4 m long and together<br />
with its hardware and rigging it weighs<br />
15 kg. It is awkward to maneuver into place ,<br />
especially where there are branches close<br />
above the one to be sampled. Under normal<br />
151
14<br />
Figure 14 . The inboard end of the spar. The hinge is<br />
of steel, 8 mm thick except for the central block ,<br />
which is 36 by 36 mm . The top of the spar is a<br />
single piece of spruce, 22 mm high, 75 mm wide ,<br />
and 4 m long . The bottom is of two pieces, eac h<br />
22 mm thick, 100 mm high, and 4 m long, glued<br />
face to face .<br />
Figure 15. The outboard end of the spar. Note that<br />
the supporting ropes are not fastened to the out -<br />
board end . They pass through blocks and guides<br />
on opposite sides of the spar and are secured at th e<br />
hinge end .<br />
circumstances it should be possible to raise<br />
the spar from the ground and have it ready<br />
for use in 2 hours or less ; in difficult circumstances<br />
it may take a full day .<br />
Figures 14-17 illustrate the constructio n<br />
and operation of the spar .<br />
The ropes used to support the outboard<br />
end of the spar are of nylon, but, unlike thos e<br />
used in climbing, are of a special braid whic h<br />
minimizes stretching (Samson Yachtbraid) .<br />
This prevents the spar from sagging out of<br />
position as the weight of the climber moves<br />
away from the tree .<br />
Note that the ropes supporting the spar ar e<br />
fastened at the inboard end of the spar, not a t<br />
the outboard end . The position at which th e<br />
spar rests depends upon the relative tensio n<br />
on these ropes . Thus a climber on the spar<br />
may maneuver herself through 180° of arc ,<br />
without returning to the trunk, by pulling on<br />
one or the other of the ropes running along<br />
the spar .<br />
The climber sits in a "swing seat" suspended<br />
by loops of webbing . A climbing stirrup<br />
permits her to move along the spar b y<br />
alternately sitting in the seat while she move s<br />
the stirrup and standing in the stirrup whil e<br />
she moves the seat .<br />
In moving the spar, the ropes are coiled an d<br />
the hinge is folded back along the spar an d<br />
fastened . In placing it on the tree, it is hung ,<br />
hinge downward, and maneuvered until th e<br />
hinge is in place . The hinge is fastened to th e<br />
tree with lag screws . Then the outboard end i s<br />
lowered into place. In removing the spar the<br />
process is reversed .<br />
The use of these three techniques in combination<br />
enables the climber to work with<br />
comparative freedom and safety for hours at a<br />
time if need be .<br />
152
Figure 16. The spar in use. The suspending ropes pass<br />
upward through carabiners on opposite sides of<br />
the tree and are tied off near the inboard end of<br />
the spar . The spar is shown in the open but woul d<br />
normally be placed adjacent to a branch system .<br />
Figure 17 . Raising the spar . A "trolley" of light<br />
nylon line is stretched from a clear area on th e<br />
trunk to an open area on the ground . The spar is<br />
packaged, with its ropes coiled and hinge folded ,<br />
and clipped to the "trolley" with carabiners . A<br />
handline and pulley aid the climber in pulling th e<br />
spar up into the tree .<br />
Tree Description<br />
and Measurement<br />
Description and measurement of a tree proceeds<br />
in two steps : an initial survey, in whic h<br />
the trunk and all of the branches are de -<br />
scribed, followed by detailed measurement o f<br />
a sample set of branch systems . The tree i s<br />
arbitrarily subdivided into components : th e<br />
main trunk plus a number of branch systems .<br />
A branch system is defined as one or mor e<br />
branches, living or dead, arising from the same<br />
point on the trunk. Several branch system s<br />
may arise at the same height, but at differen t<br />
points around the circumference of the trunk .<br />
For examples of kinds of data recorded and<br />
calculated, the reader should refer to table 1<br />
while reading the following sections .<br />
Survey<br />
As the tree is climbed, the trunk is marked<br />
off vertically in meters, by use of tape. At<br />
convenient intervals, 5 to 10 m, a benchmar k<br />
is established and its height verified by transit<br />
from the ground. The diameter and inclination<br />
of the trunk are recorded at the benchmarks.<br />
It is not safe to climb above the poin t<br />
where the trunk is 10 cm or less in diameter ,<br />
so we have treated the portion above tha t<br />
point as an exceptional branch system . When ,<br />
through damage to the original leader, one or<br />
more secondary leaders have developed, the y<br />
are treated in the same fashion as the main<br />
trunk .<br />
153
Each branch system is numbered. The position<br />
of each branch system on the trunk i s<br />
recorded by height and compass quadrant .<br />
Each branch system is scored for 10 variables.<br />
Most of these variables relate to the<br />
structure and biomass of the tree, but sinc e<br />
this study began as a survey of epiphyte distribution,<br />
three variables relate to epiphyte load .<br />
1. Number of Main Axes<br />
A "main axis" is defined as a branch more<br />
than 4 cm in diameter, originating within 1<br />
dm of the trunk. Six classes are recognized :<br />
no axes (i .e., no branch more than 4 cm i n<br />
diameter), one axis, two axes, three axes, fou r<br />
axes, and five or more axes .<br />
2. Extension from Trun k<br />
The extension is measured as the horizonta l<br />
distance from the trunk to the furthest tip o f<br />
any part of the branch system . Five classes are<br />
recognized : 0-1 m, 1-3 m, 3-5 m, 5-10 m, and<br />
more than 10 m .<br />
3. Total Length of Living Axe s<br />
An "axis" is any branch more than 4 cm i n<br />
diameter. The total estimated here is of th e<br />
length of all living axes within the branc h<br />
system . Six classes are recognized : 0-1 m, 1-5<br />
m, 5-10 m, 10-15 m, and more than 20 m .<br />
4. Total Length of Dead Axe s<br />
The definition and classes are as in 3 above ,<br />
except that here the branches are dead .<br />
5. Area of Branchlets and Foliag e<br />
An estimate is made of the area of a n<br />
imaginary figure formed by connecting th e<br />
outer tips of all branchlets with the point o f<br />
attachment to the trunk and projecting th e<br />
outline on a horizontal plane . Six classes ar e<br />
recognized : 0-1 m 2 , 1-2 m 2 , 2-5 m2 , 5-10 m 2 ,<br />
10-20 m 2 , and more than 20 m 2 .<br />
6. Density of Branchlets and Foliage<br />
Within the area delimited in 5 above, a n<br />
estimate is made of the area occupied b y<br />
branchlets and foliage . Six classes, expressed<br />
as percents of the total area, are recognized : 0<br />
percent (no foliage), 0-20 percent, 20-40 percent,<br />
40-60 percent, 60-80 percent, an d<br />
80-100 percent .<br />
7. Maximum Diameter of Axi s<br />
The maximum diameter of the largest axi s<br />
is measured to the nearest centimeter .<br />
8. Lichen Cover : All Specie s<br />
The lichen cover is estimated for all axes in<br />
the branch system . Only foliose and fruticos e<br />
species are counted . The cover is expressed a s<br />
a percent of the total surface area on all axes .<br />
Six classes are recognized : 0 percent (n o<br />
lichens), 0-20 percent, 20-40 percent, 40-60<br />
percent, 60-80 percent, and 80-100 percent .<br />
9. Lichen Cover : Lobaria species<br />
The cover is estimated and expressed for<br />
Lobaria species alone, using the same classes<br />
listed in 8 above .<br />
10. Bryophyte Cover : All Specie s<br />
The cover is estimated and expressed for al l<br />
bryophytes using the same classes listed in 8<br />
above .<br />
The data from this survey are tabulated ,<br />
with the branch systems arranged by number ,<br />
in the order in which they occur on the tree .<br />
A sample group of branch systems is the n<br />
selected for detailed measurement .<br />
Sample Selectio n<br />
The number of branch systems selected fo r<br />
detailed measurement (n) depends upon th e<br />
complexity of the tree : two branch system s<br />
are selected in a small, uniform tree ; three, i n<br />
a normal tree ; four or five, in a tree with more<br />
than one leader . In our example, five branc h<br />
systems were selected and measured .<br />
An importance value (v) is calculated fo r<br />
each branch system according to the following<br />
formula :<br />
where ,<br />
v = b 2 +b 1 2 + ad + 1 + m<br />
b = class number (1-6) of total lengt h<br />
of living axes<br />
b 1 class number (1-6) of total lengt h<br />
of dead axe s<br />
a = class number (1-6) of area of<br />
branchlets and foliage<br />
d = class number (1-6) of density o f<br />
branchlets and foliage<br />
l = class number (1-6) of lichen cover ,<br />
all specie s<br />
m = class number (1-6) of bryophyte cove r<br />
The importance value is listed for each<br />
branch system, and both running totals and a<br />
grand total (V) are calculated . The grand total<br />
(2,111 in our example) is set equal to the<br />
number of branch systems to be selected (five<br />
154
in our example) and the running totals recalculated<br />
. For example, branch number 87 has<br />
an uncorrected running total of 28 . The corrected<br />
total is: 28(5/2,111)=0 .066. After thi s<br />
correction, each branch system is represented<br />
by an interval, proportional to its importance<br />
value, which is the difference between<br />
its corrected running total and that of<br />
the preceding branch system .<br />
A random number is drawn : a three-place<br />
fraction of 1 .000 . In our example, the number<br />
drawn was 0 .870. Those branch systems<br />
are selected which have intervals which include<br />
: the random number, 1 + the random<br />
number, 2 + the random number, etc . In ou r<br />
example, the numbers 0 .87, 1.870, 2 .870 ,<br />
3 .870, and 4 .870 corresponded to branc h<br />
system numbers 7, 33, 61, 93, and 116 .<br />
The branch systems selected in this way ar e<br />
measured in detail as described below .<br />
Branch System Measuremen t<br />
The measurement of each selected branc h<br />
system is carried out in 10 stages . The first<br />
four stages occur in the field and require the<br />
use of the spar ; the remaining stages occur i n<br />
the laboratory .<br />
1. Each axis is marked off in decimeter<br />
lengths and the total length of the main axe s<br />
is recorded .<br />
2. The diameter is recorded every 4 dm .<br />
3. The transition points (4-cm diam) a t<br />
which an axis becomes a branchlet are<br />
identified .<br />
4. At one-fourth of the transition point s<br />
the distal portion, consisting of branchlets<br />
and attached foliage, is cut off and lowered t o<br />
the ground for further study .<br />
5. The annual rings are counted at the cu t<br />
end of the removed branch and the age of the<br />
sample is recorded .<br />
6. The foliage-bearing portion of each<br />
sample is cut into lengths bearing a singl e<br />
year's needles .<br />
7. A subsample of 20 of each year 's<br />
needles is measured (length and width) while<br />
fresh .<br />
8. The foliage and attached fragments of<br />
branchlet are dried at 85° and weighed . Th e<br />
weight of each year's foliage is recorded, as is<br />
the weight of its associated segments o f<br />
branchlet .<br />
9. The older branchlets, those without<br />
foliage, are cut into lengths representin g<br />
approximately 1 year 's growth and their<br />
lengths and diameters are recorded .<br />
10. The segments of older branchlet are<br />
dried at 85° and weighed .<br />
Analysi s<br />
Several types of information can be summarized<br />
from data accumulated by the techniques<br />
described . Two of these, surface are a<br />
of the trunk and limbs and epiphyte biomass ,<br />
are described in a paper by Pike et al .(1972) .<br />
Analyses of wood and foliage biomass ar e<br />
being developed, but at present our results ar e<br />
incomplete since they are based on a singl e<br />
tree .<br />
Another kind of analysis results in a diagram<br />
of the tree (fig . 18) ; a graphic summarization,<br />
to scale, of the structure of an individual<br />
tree . This diagram is an east-wes t<br />
vertical section . It serves both as a map fo r<br />
those working on the tree and as a chart of th e<br />
distribution of branch systems and foliage .<br />
Reconstruction of the trunk is based upon<br />
benchmark measurements of diameter, height ,<br />
and inclination. A second leader, originatin g<br />
on the north side of the main trunk at th e<br />
40-m level, is drawn to the same scale but<br />
displaced to the right . Only those branc h<br />
systems are shown which project to the eas t<br />
or to the west. From existing data one could<br />
draw a comparable north-south section displaying<br />
the remaining branch systems . Eac h<br />
branch system is shown in its correct positio n<br />
on the trunk and the length of the longes t<br />
horizontal line indicates, to scale, the distanc e<br />
the entire branch system projected away fro m<br />
the trunk . However, the arrangement of axes<br />
and foliage within a branch system is symbolic<br />
rather than pictorial .<br />
Living branch systems are represented by a<br />
parallelogram, representing foliage, usuall y<br />
accompanied by one or more solid lines ,<br />
representing axes . Parallelograms without<br />
solid lines are branch systems in which n o<br />
branch was more than 4 cm in diameter .<br />
155
156<br />
Figure 18 . Semidiagrammatic reconstruction of Tree Number 1, Watershed 10 .<br />
Only those branch systems extending to the east or west are shown . Th e<br />
second trunk is drawn to scale at the right height, but is displaced to the right .<br />
Solid horizontal lines represent living branches (axes) or branch systems<br />
more than 4 cm in diameter . The length of the line indicates, to scale, how fa r<br />
the whole branch system extends from the trunk . Dead branches are represented<br />
by dashed lines . The parallelograms represent branchlets and foliage .<br />
The length of a parallelogram represents the horizontal area covered by th e<br />
branch system, and the height represents the density of branchlets an d<br />
foliage within that area . Parallelograms without horizontal lines are branc h<br />
systems with no branches more than 4 cm in diameter . Numbered branc h<br />
systems are those selected for detailed measurement .
Dashed lines are dead branches . The area of a<br />
foliage parallelogram is a measure of the<br />
amount of foliage within the branch system .<br />
The length of a parallelogram is a function of<br />
the area of the branch system ; the height of a<br />
parallelogram is a function of the density of<br />
foliage within the branch system .<br />
Individual branch systems are easily identified.<br />
For example, those branch systems<br />
which were selected for detailed measuremen t<br />
(numbers 7, 33, 61, 93, and 116) are identified<br />
by number on the diagram .<br />
Discussion<br />
Although the access technique is still being<br />
improved, it is now very nearly routine fo r<br />
trees with a growth pattern similar t o<br />
Douglas-fir . It could undoubtedly be modified<br />
for use in measuring large trees with different<br />
growth patterns . It would be particularly<br />
interesting to attempt to apply the method to<br />
trees of the upper canopy in lowland tropica l<br />
wet forests .<br />
We have not had adequate opportunity t o<br />
evaluate the accuracy of our methods of<br />
description and measurement . The basic pat -<br />
tern seems satisfactory, but there will b e<br />
changes made before we extend it to additional<br />
trees . We will increase the precision o f<br />
initial estimates of lengths of axes . We need<br />
better methods for estimating foliage biomass .<br />
The importance value used in selecting branc h<br />
systems combined values for foliage biomas s<br />
with values for epiphyte load . This resulted i n<br />
selection of a subset that was a poor compromise<br />
between the conflicting requirements fo r<br />
measurement of tree biomass and measurement<br />
of epiphyte biomass . In the future ,<br />
separate importance values will be calculate d<br />
for tree biomass and epiphyte biomass ; an d<br />
separate sets of branch systems will be selected<br />
and measured .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The authors are grateful to many people<br />
who contributed to the development of thi s<br />
project . Don Kirkpatrick taught us the ascent<br />
technique and made the first ascent . Othe r<br />
climbers (Diane Nielsen, Tom Denison, Jan e<br />
McCauley, and Karen Berliner), working wit h<br />
the authors, have helped in data taking an d<br />
have made improvements in climbin g<br />
methods. Dr. Jack Culver (Benton Boa t<br />
Works) suggested improvements in the desig n<br />
of the spar, and James Ewanowski (Arborea l<br />
Constructions) built it. Sue Carpenter helpe d<br />
with the drawings . Dr. Scott Overton suggested<br />
the basic format of the sampling pattern<br />
and has guided its development .<br />
This project began (July-August 1970) as a<br />
student project under the National Scienc e<br />
Foundation Undergraduate Research Participation<br />
Program (Grant Number GY-7641) in<br />
the Department of Botany and Plant Pathology,<br />
Oregon State University . Subsequent<br />
work has been supported by National Science<br />
Foundation Grant Number GB-20963 to the<br />
Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome, U .S . Analysis o f<br />
Ecosystems, International Biological Program .<br />
This is Contribution No . 31 from the Coniferous<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Biome .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Blackshaw, A . 1970 . Mountaineering . 552 p .<br />
Hammondsworth : Penguin Books .<br />
Burger, H . 1935 . Holz, Blattmenge and<br />
Zuwachs. II. Die Douglasie. Mitt. Schweiz .<br />
Anst. forstl . Vers. 19 : 21-72 .<br />
Coleman, B . B., W. C. Muenscher, and D . R .<br />
Charles . 1956 . A distributional study of th e<br />
epiphytic plants of the Olympic Peninsula ,<br />
Washington . Am. Midland Nat . 56 : 54-87 .<br />
Hartley, H. O. 1966. Systematic samplin g<br />
with unequal probability and without re -<br />
placement. J. Am. Statist . Assoc . 61 :<br />
739-748 .<br />
Hoffman, G. R., and R . G. Kazmierski . 1969 .<br />
An ecological study of the epiphytic bryophytes<br />
on Pseudotsuga menziesii on the<br />
Olympic Peninsula, Washington. I . A<br />
description of the vegetation . Bryologist<br />
72 : 1-18 .<br />
Manning, H. (ed.), 1967. Mountaineering the<br />
freedom of the hills . 2d ed . 485 p . Seattle :<br />
The Mountaineers .<br />
157
Newbold, P . J. 1967 . Methods for estimatin g<br />
the primary production of forests . I .P.P .<br />
Handbook #2 . 62 p. Oxford, England :<br />
Blackwell Sci . Publ .<br />
Pike, Lawrence H., Diane M . Tracy, Martha A .<br />
Sherwood, and Diane Nielsen . 1972. Estimates<br />
of biomass and fixed nitrogen o f<br />
epiphytes from old-growth Douglas-fir . In<br />
Jerry F. Franklin, L . J . Dempster, an d<br />
Richard Waring (eds .), Proceedings-researc h<br />
on coniferous forest ecosystems-a symposium,<br />
p. 177-187, illus . Pac . Northwest<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> & Range Exp . Stn ., Portland, Oreg .<br />
Reukema, D . L. 1961 . Crown developmen t<br />
and its effect on stem growth of six<br />
Douglas-firs . J. For. 59 : 370-371 .<br />
Table 1 .-Exemplary data for branch systems on tree #1-a Douglas-fi r<br />
on Watershed 10, H . J. <strong>Andrews</strong> <strong>Experimental</strong> Fores t<br />
c<br />
w<br />
N<br />
so<br />
S<br />
O0<br />
m<br />
m o<br />
EO sO+ .,<br />
V Q<br />
.w<br />
G<br />
o ~<br />
•d S+<br />
C F<br />
Total Lengt h<br />
of Branches<br />
E al<br />
E ~<br />
Lichen Cove r<br />
All<br />
Specie s<br />
-% -<br />
Lobari a<br />
-% -<br />
w E<br />
x<br />
o<br />
il w<br />
-m-<br />
x m<br />
Liv e<br />
-m -<br />
Dea d<br />
-m -<br />
N• m<br />
-cm-<br />
-% -<br />
w<br />
-c LL H<br />
O 0<br />
0 0<br />
WI V<br />
-%-<br />
88 59 .1 TOP<br />
87 59 .1 S<br />
86 58 .8 W<br />
85 58 .5 E<br />
84 58 .2 W<br />
83 58 .2 N<br />
82 58 .2 S<br />
81 57 .6 S<br />
22 41 .1 W<br />
21 40 .8 W<br />
20 40 .2 W<br />
19 39 .3 W<br />
18 38 .4 W<br />
17 38 .1 W<br />
2 20 .4 N<br />
1 15 .9 N<br />
128 49 .8 W<br />
127 49 .5 N<br />
93 40 .5 E<br />
92 40 .5 N<br />
91 40 .2 N<br />
90 40 .2 N<br />
89 39 .9 N<br />
1 1-3 1-5 30 2-5 10-20 40-60 40-60 15 1 5<br />
1 1-3 1-5 5 1-2 20-40 0-20 0-20 13 2 8<br />
1 1-3 1-5 6 1-2 0-20 0-20 0-20 11 3 9<br />
1 0-1 0-1 5 0-1 0-20 0-20 5 44<br />
1 1-3 1-5 5 1-2 020 0-20 0-20 11 5 5<br />
1 1-3 1-5 8 0-1 0-20 0-20 0-20 9 6 4<br />
1 0--1 0-1 5 0-1 0-20 0-20 0-20 6 7 0<br />
2 1-3 1-5 6 2-5 20-40 0-20 0-20 0-20 17 8 7<br />
1 1-3 1-5 9 0-1 40-60 0-20 0-20 11 94 9<br />
1 0-1 0-1 6 0-1 0-20 5 95 4<br />
1 1-3 1- 5<br />
8 0- 1<br />
0-20 12 96 6<br />
At this point the second trunk leaves the tree, 40m, N Compas s<br />
2 3-5 5-10 7 5-10 60-80 0-20 0-20 0-20 33 99 9<br />
1 5-10 5-10 8 2-5 20-40 20-40 0-20 22 102 1<br />
1 0-1 0-1 3 0-1 80-100 9 103 0<br />
5 3-5 10-15 8 10-20 40-60 0-20 0-20 20-40 41 137 8<br />
4 3-5 10-15 5-10 10 10-20 60-80 0-20 20-40 55 143 3<br />
Data for trunk 2 which left the tree between branch 19 & 2 0<br />
1 3-5 1-5 6 1-2 0-20 0-20 0-20 0-20 12 1445<br />
1 3-5 1-5 6 1-2 0-20 0-20 0-20 11 L45 6<br />
1 3-5 1-5 12 5-10 20-40 0-20 0-20 20-40 21 206 2<br />
1 1-3 1-5 9 0-1 20-40 0-20 20-40 11 207 3<br />
1 0-1 0-1 9 0-1 0-20 0-20 0-20 6 207 9<br />
1 3-5 5-10 11 2-5 20-40 0-20 0-20 20-40 23 210 2<br />
1 1-3 1-5 7 0-1 0-20 0-20 0-20 9 211 1<br />
158
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 1972<br />
Estimation of biomass and transpiratio n<br />
in coniferous forests using<br />
tritiated water<br />
Abstract<br />
J . R . Kline,<br />
M . L . Stewart,<br />
C . F . Jorda n<br />
Radiological Physics Divisio n<br />
Argonne National Laboratory<br />
Argonne, Illinois 60439<br />
Nondestructive measurement of biomass and transpiration rates in trees is dependent on a new application of<br />
the established theory of tracer dynamics in steady state systems. The method utilizes HTO as a tracer for H2 0<br />
in the plant. Both transpiration and biomass measurements require experimental determination of tritiu m<br />
activity in the tree as a function of time. Biomass measurement requires one additional parameter-the mean<br />
residence time of water in the plant. In this paper we examine various theoretical and experimental alternative s<br />
for determining mean residence times. Data supporting one alternative is presented. The measurement of<br />
conducting tissue biomass is also discussed .<br />
Introduction<br />
Kinetic theory and tracer distributio n<br />
methods have been used extensively in measurement<br />
of the properties of flowing system s<br />
both in biology and engineering . The theoretical<br />
aspects and the underlying assumption s<br />
governing the practical application of tracer<br />
dynamics have been thoroughly discussed by<br />
authors in many fields. Reports by Zierler<br />
(1964), Bergner (1961, 1964a, 1964b, 1965 ,<br />
1966), and Ljunggren (1967) have describe d<br />
the use of tracer dynamics and kinetic theory<br />
in the nondestructive measurement of flo w<br />
rates, mean residence times, and compartmental<br />
volumes of steady state biological an d<br />
engineering systems .<br />
It is the purpose of this paper to presen t<br />
the state of the art in the application of th e<br />
theory and tracer methods to the nondestructive<br />
measurement of tree biomass and transpiration,<br />
and to examine the experimenta l<br />
parameters that can be measured as well a s<br />
the underlying theoretical assumptions on<br />
which they are based .<br />
The nondestructive measurement of transpiration<br />
rates and biomass in trees utilize s<br />
tritiated water (HTO) as a tracer for water .<br />
Tritiated water is added to the tree water pool<br />
by injection into the trunk near ground level .<br />
The fate of the HTO tracer-labeled water in a<br />
tree is followed by monitoring tritium activity,<br />
as a function of time, in foliage and smal l<br />
branches. Both transpiration and biomas s<br />
measurements require experimental determination<br />
of tritium concentration-tim e<br />
curves. Biomass requires additionally th e<br />
mean residence time of water in the tree and<br />
the mean moisture content of the tree .<br />
Theoretical Discussion<br />
Transpiration Measurement<br />
Application of the theory of tracer dynamics<br />
to the problem of measuring transpira-<br />
159
tion rates in plants has been previously<br />
demonstrated' 2 (Kline et al . 1970) . The<br />
theory itself has been discussed extensively b y<br />
Bergner (1961, 1964a, 1964b, 1965, 1966) ,<br />
Zierler (1964), Ljunggren (1967), and Orr and<br />
Gillespie (1964) . Transpiration measurement s<br />
depend upon use of the Stewart-Hamilto n<br />
equation shown by equation 1 :<br />
M = F f 0 - f(t)dt , (1 )<br />
where M = total activity of tritium initially<br />
injected (disintegrations pe r<br />
minute, DPM) ,<br />
F = the flow rate of water throug h<br />
the tree (ml/hour x tree) ,<br />
f(t) = activity distribution of tritiu m<br />
at the points of exit from th e<br />
system (DPM/ml), and<br />
t = time (hr) .<br />
Equation 1 states simply that the product<br />
of the flow rate (F) and the total integral of<br />
the curve of activity versus time (fig. 1) is<br />
equal to the total activity of the tracer whic h<br />
was originally injected . In practice the<br />
activity-time curve is measured experimentally<br />
and the total activity injected is<br />
fixed by the experimenter . The flow rate (F )<br />
is the only unknown quantity in equation 1<br />
and is solved algebraically . The value of F is<br />
the daily flow rate which is averaged over day -<br />
time and nighttime flows. The average i s<br />
taken over the full time interval of residenc e<br />
of tritium in the tree . Shorter term resolution<br />
of transpiration is not possible with thi s<br />
method . Examples of transpiration rate s<br />
which have been obtained using equation 1<br />
with tritiated water as the tracer are given in<br />
table 1 for field-grown coniferous trees .<br />
1 J. R. Kline, C. F. Jordan, and R . C . Rose . Transpiration<br />
measurements in pines using tritiated wate r<br />
as a tracer . In D. J. Nelson (ed .), Third Nationa l<br />
Symposium on Radioecology, Proc ., May 10-12 ,<br />
1971, Oak Ridge, Tenn . (In press . )<br />
'J . R . Kline, M. L. Stewart, C . F . Jordan, an d<br />
Patricia Kovac_ Use of tritiated water for determination<br />
of plant transpiration and biomass under fiel d<br />
conditions . In Symposium on the Use of Isotopes an d<br />
Radiation in Soil-Plant Research Including Applications<br />
in <strong>Forest</strong>ry, Proc . Int . At . Energy Agency Conf .<br />
SM-151, December 13-17, 1971 .Vienna, , Austria . (I n<br />
press .)<br />
50 30 0<br />
Figure 1 . Typical activity-time response curve obtained<br />
by injecting a jack pine (Pins banksiana)<br />
tree with tritiated water and sampling twigs as a<br />
function of time for tritium content . Peak arriva l<br />
time is indicated by Tp .<br />
Biomass Measuremen t<br />
The measurement of tree biomass is base d<br />
on that part of the theory of tracer dynamic s<br />
which permits calculation of the pool size o f<br />
the compartment through which flow take s<br />
place . In trees the pool refers simply to th e<br />
average total water content of the tree . Whe n<br />
pool size has been computed, it is a simpl e<br />
matter to convert to biomass using the aver -<br />
age moisture percentage of the wood .<br />
Derivation of an expression which permit s<br />
computation of compartmental pool size i s<br />
given by Zierler (1964) . Zierler's expression i s<br />
given by equation 2 :<br />
C =F Tm , (2)<br />
where C = compartment volume (ml) ,<br />
F = flow rate through the compartment<br />
(ml/hr), and<br />
Tm = mean residence time of th e<br />
flowing substance (hr) .<br />
Equation 2 states simply that the compartment<br />
pool size is given by the product of th e<br />
160
Table 1.-Transpiration rates, mean residence times, computed biomasses, and observe d<br />
biomasses for field-grown red and jack pine tree s<br />
Red pine (Pinus resinosa) (1970 )<br />
Tree<br />
number<br />
Dbh<br />
(CM)<br />
Transpiration<br />
rate (F )<br />
(ml/hr)<br />
resi ence<br />
time (Tp )<br />
(hr)<br />
Computed<br />
dry biomas s<br />
(kg)<br />
Observed<br />
dry biomass<br />
(kg)<br />
3 14 .1 1170 50 42 .4 42 . 6<br />
4 9.5 222 110 17 .7 12 . 2<br />
5 12 .1 935 42 28 .4 26 . 3<br />
6 13 .3 1280 42 38 .9 35 . 1<br />
7 12 .3 725 49 25 .7 26 . 7<br />
8 8 .2 413 49 14 .6 12 . 1<br />
10 12 .3 254 98 18 .0 20.6<br />
Mean tree weight ± SE 26 .5 ± 4 .1 25 .1 ± 4 . 3<br />
Mean forest biomass ± SE (kg/ha) 7.7 x 10 4 ± 1 .2 7.3 x 10 4 ± 1 . 2<br />
Jack pine (Pinus banksiana) (1971 )<br />
Tree<br />
number<br />
Dbh<br />
(CM)<br />
Transpiration<br />
rate (F)<br />
(<br />
/hr)<br />
re isdeece<br />
time (T )<br />
(hr) p<br />
Computed<br />
dry biomass<br />
(kg )<br />
Observe d<br />
dry biomass<br />
( kg)<br />
1 10 .5 807 49 38.5 19 . 9<br />
2 12 .0 833 52 33.5 26 .7<br />
3 10 .0 540 48 21 .5 19 . 9<br />
4 10.0 941 27 25.6 32 . 0<br />
5 8.9 570 45 25 .4 18 . 1<br />
6 11 .0 833 25 19 .2 26 . 0<br />
7 11 .0 609 23 17 .0 32 . 3<br />
8 9.5 506 46 24 .6 24 . 6<br />
9 10 .4 492 27 18 .3 20 . 9<br />
11 11 .4 1083 26 28 .0 28 . 5<br />
12 9.4 903 24 27 .2 20 . 0<br />
Mean tree weight ± SE 23.3 ± 2 .0 24 .4 ± 1 . 5<br />
Mean forest biomass ± SE (kg/ha) 6.3 x 10 4 ± 0 .5 6.1 x 104 ± 0 .4<br />
16 1
flow rate and the mean residence time of th e<br />
system .<br />
In plants the pool size (C) is also given b y<br />
the difference between wet and dry weigh t<br />
(W-D) of the plant . Moisture fraction is conventionally<br />
calculated by equation 3 :<br />
W-D<br />
W<br />
= f ,<br />
where W = wet weight of sample (gm) ,<br />
(3)<br />
D = dry weight of sample (gm), an d<br />
f = fractional moisture content .<br />
Equation 3 holds equally well for the cas e<br />
where the determination is done on the entire<br />
plant or for a representative subsample of the<br />
plant. In the case where the entire plant is the<br />
sample, W-D can be substituted for C in equa -<br />
tion 1 resulting in equation 4, which is an<br />
expression for the moist weight of the plant :<br />
W=1F•Tm . (4)<br />
f<br />
Moist weight can be converted to dry weigh t<br />
using equation 3 . This results in equation 5<br />
which is an expression for dry biomass of th e<br />
plant :<br />
D = 11-f FTm . (5)<br />
f<br />
Equation 5 requires the experimental determination<br />
of f, F, and Tm for its solution . In<br />
the absence of a feasible method for deter -<br />
mining f on the entire tree, it is necessary t o<br />
measure it on subsamples. Ideally the subsamples<br />
should be weighted for different tre e<br />
parts such as trunk, branches, and leaves .<br />
Since there is usually no method available for<br />
measuring weighting factors, we have followed<br />
the practice of estimating moistur e<br />
content of the tree trunk since this represent s<br />
the greater portion of the biomass of the tree .<br />
In our experience, moisture content of plan t<br />
parts has not been greatly different from one<br />
another and no serious errors are introduced<br />
by following this procedure . If plants are<br />
found where unweighted estimates of f diffe r<br />
from the true weighted value, then this coul d<br />
be a significant source of error in the estimate<br />
of biomass .<br />
The value of F in equation 5 is the mean<br />
flow rate which has previously been calculated<br />
using equation 1 . This means that th e<br />
reliability of the estimate of biomass can b e<br />
no better in general than the reliability o f<br />
flow or transpiration rate . Biomass estimate s<br />
are normally expected to have lower statistical<br />
precision than transpiration estimate s<br />
since they require the use of additional measured<br />
parameters .<br />
The most difficult parameter to measure i n<br />
equation 5 is Tm, the mean residence time .<br />
There appear to be at least three possibl e<br />
approaches to obtain this quantity : (1) measure<br />
the slope of the declining branch of th e<br />
activity-time curve ; (2) compute the firs t<br />
moment of the curve ; or (3) measure th e<br />
transit time between the point of injection<br />
and the point of exit of the tracer from the<br />
system (Donato et al . 1964) .<br />
The slope method for mean residence tim e<br />
would be valid in the case where the plant is<br />
labeled to equilibrium with the tracer . If all of<br />
the water molecules of the trees were labeled<br />
equally with HTO, then the rate at which tritium<br />
activity declines in the tree would b e<br />
proportional to the amount of tritiu m<br />
present . Such systems are described by an<br />
equation of the form A = AO e- Xt where AO i s<br />
initial activity, A is activity at time t and X i s<br />
the rate constant of loss . The term X is th e<br />
slope when data described by this relationshi p<br />
are plotted on semilogarithmic coordinates .<br />
The mean residence time for such a relation -<br />
ship is simply the reciprocal of X (Tm =<br />
This is a frequently used relationship for obtaining<br />
Tm although in practice it is some -<br />
times used without verification of the assumptions.<br />
In some systems it is possible to label t o<br />
equilibrium by injecting the tracer into the<br />
system continuously ; however, in large trees<br />
this would entail larger than desirable releases<br />
of radioactivity to the environment . Therefore,<br />
it is preferable to label by the instantaneous<br />
pulse method . When the pulse method<br />
of labeling is used, the injected material<br />
moves upward in the tree while retaining its<br />
pulse shape. The pulse may undergq consider -<br />
able broadening but the system cannot be<br />
assumed to have achieved uniform labeling . In<br />
162
this case the slopes of activity-time curve s<br />
have two components, one reflecting the turn -<br />
over rate of water and the other reflecting the<br />
pulse shape. There is no method currently<br />
available for resolving these components in a n<br />
activity-time curve, and therefore the slope of<br />
the curve cannot validly be used to compute<br />
Tm .<br />
Ljunggren (1967) has described the compu -<br />
tation of mean residence times for flowin g<br />
systems using the first moment of th e<br />
activity-time curve. The first moment is th e<br />
centroidal axis of the activity-time distribution-that<br />
vertical axis which divides th e<br />
distribution into two parts having equal areas .<br />
Equation 6 indicates the method :<br />
f0`°t f(t) dt<br />
Tm* _ (6)<br />
f ff(t) dt<br />
In general, Tm* will always be the tru e<br />
mean residence time of the tracer in th e<br />
system under study . The tracer mean residence<br />
time of the system will satisfy the relationship<br />
of equation 2, however, only under<br />
the conditions of identical behavior of trace r<br />
and substance traced . In trees, the nominal<br />
mean residence time for water, Tm, is no t<br />
equal to the tracer mean residence time Tm *<br />
since the tracer apparently undergoes interactions<br />
with the conducting vessels of the<br />
tree . The relationship is given by the<br />
expression<br />
Tm *=f 1 Tm +f2 TH<br />
where TH is the residence time of the fractio n<br />
of tritium which has undergone some interaction<br />
with the wood and fl and f2 are fractions<br />
of the total tritium which pass throug h<br />
the tree without interaction and with inter -<br />
action, respectively . Possible interactions include<br />
isotopic exchange of tritium wit h<br />
hydrogen of the wood or diffusion of tritiu m<br />
into non flowing compartments of plant<br />
water. <strong>Experimental</strong>ly Tm*>Tm has been<br />
found for all trees which have been examine d<br />
to date, indicating that the term f2 TH has a<br />
nonzero value in trees . This phenomenon has<br />
been termed "holdback" by others who have<br />
examined tracer dynamics in flowing vessels<br />
(Ljunggren 1967) . Because of "holdback" the<br />
value of Tm* cannot be used without correction<br />
to solve equation 2 . The problem of finding<br />
an appropriate value for f2 TH is presentl y<br />
unsolved .<br />
In general, the mean residence time for a<br />
flowing system can always be obtained by<br />
measuring the activity distribution of a trace r<br />
in the system at two points along the flow<br />
pathway (Ljunggren 1967) . If Ti is the time<br />
of passage of the tracer at point 1 and T2 the<br />
time of passage at point 2 further down -<br />
stream, then Tm = T2 - Ti where Tm is the<br />
mean residence time between the two sampling<br />
points. Since the tracer normally undergoes<br />
peak broadening, Ti and T2 are taken as<br />
the times when the peak of the distributio n<br />
passes the sampling points . In trees we fix th e<br />
initial position of the tracer by the injectio n<br />
at time Ti = O . In this special case Tm = T2 .<br />
The value of T2 could be measured at an y<br />
point in the tree downstream to the injection<br />
point. In the special case where the downstream<br />
sampling point is tree foliage, the n<br />
Tm = Tp where Tp is simply the time of pea k<br />
arrival in the foliage .<br />
As a first approximation it can be assumed<br />
that Tp is not affected by "holdback" as was<br />
Tm* because tritium is probably remove d<br />
from free flowing forms equally over the en -<br />
tire activity distribution . That is, interactio n<br />
of tritium with conducting vessels could a s<br />
well occur with the isotope in the leadin g<br />
edge of the distribution or the trailing edge .<br />
The peak position would, therefore, not b e<br />
affected by these interactions . This assumption<br />
requires experimental verification whic h<br />
is given in the results section .<br />
Correction for Nonconducting Tissue<br />
The foregoing suggests that tritium trace r<br />
experiments can only be used to measur e<br />
actually conducting biomass in trees . Such tissues<br />
as bark, flowers, fruit, and nonconducting<br />
heartwood will not be included in the estimate.<br />
Roots are not included in the estimate<br />
since the tracer injection is normally done i n<br />
tree trunks above the roots . In practical biomass<br />
measurements for forestry purposes, th e<br />
163
most serious problem is the omission of non -<br />
conducting heartwood from the direct measurement.<br />
The theory of tracer dynamics cannot<br />
be used for direct measurement of thi s<br />
quantity, and it is, therefore, necessary t o<br />
make an approximation . Equation 7 expresse s<br />
the relationship between total biomass an d<br />
the biomass of heartwood and sapwood :<br />
where VT<br />
VTPT = VHPH + V SPS , (7)<br />
total volume of tree tissu e<br />
( cm3 ) ,<br />
weighted mean wood<br />
density (cm3 ) ,<br />
VH ; VS= volume of heartwood an d<br />
sapwood (cm 3 ), an d<br />
PH ;PS<br />
density of heartwood an d<br />
sapwood ( )<br />
cm 3<br />
Substituting the relationship s<br />
PH/PS = K<br />
and VH/V S = A<br />
into equation 7 results in equation 8 :<br />
VTPT = V SpS ( AK + 1) . ( 8 )<br />
Assuming that the volume of heartwoo d<br />
and that of the total tree can be approximated<br />
by a right circular cone, an expression<br />
for A is derived as follows :<br />
r2<br />
where r<br />
PT<br />
X = Ar (2r + Ar )<br />
= mean radius of heartwood at<br />
base (cm), and<br />
Ar = mean thickness of sapwoo d<br />
at base (cm) .<br />
Upon substituting for A in equation 8, a fina l<br />
expression for tree biomass is obtained :<br />
r 2 K<br />
VTpT = D = V S p S ( Or(2r + Dr) + 1)<br />
. (9)<br />
The numerical group V.T.I. is the total plan t<br />
biomass (D) and the group VsPs is the conducting<br />
or sapwood biomass as measured b y<br />
the tritium method. Equation 9 is not sensitive<br />
to the assumption that wood volumes ar e<br />
approximated by right circular cones. Th e<br />
same result is obtained for a right circular<br />
cylinder or for intermediate figures .<br />
Equation 9 has not yet been evaluated experimentally<br />
. It is proposed here to suggest<br />
some of the anticipated lines of research to b e<br />
undertaken in the Coniferous Biome. A principal<br />
problem for the solution of equation 9<br />
lies in accurate measurement of the quantitie s<br />
r and Ar . These quantities fundamentally refer<br />
to the radii of nonconducting and conductin g<br />
wood, respectively . In the simplest case they<br />
may be coincident with heartwood and sapwood<br />
as observed visually. Their evaluatio n<br />
could then be done by straightforward measurement<br />
of tree cores .<br />
An accurate solution also depends on th e<br />
nature of the transition zone between con -<br />
ducting and nonconducting tissue . If this is<br />
sharply defined, then r and Ar will be wel l<br />
defined and an accurate solution to equation<br />
9 can be obtained . If the conduction under -<br />
goes a gradual transition across the radius o f<br />
the tree, there may be no practical method<br />
for assigning values to r and An It is possibl e<br />
that reasonable values can be obtained b y<br />
studying tritium distribution along wood<br />
cores which have been taken from tritium -<br />
labeled trees. These considerations apply t o<br />
large trees which have appreciable volumes o f<br />
heartwood . In the trees for which we hav e<br />
experimental data, heartwood was a mino r<br />
part of the total tree volume and was no t<br />
considered .<br />
Results<br />
The mean residence time Tm is the most<br />
difficult parameter of equation 5 to obtain ,<br />
principally because it is not generally known a<br />
priori which of several possible means of computing<br />
it is the correct one . The desired value<br />
is the nominal mean residence time Tm<br />
(equation 2); however, in the usual non -<br />
destructive experiment this is not directly obtainable<br />
. Where tritium-injected trees have<br />
been harvested, however, the water pool siz e<br />
(C) is directly obtainable from biomass an d<br />
moisture measurements, and it is possible to<br />
164
solve equation 2 for Tm since the flow rat e<br />
(F) is known . The values of Tm obtained b y<br />
this direct method were compared to th e<br />
values obtained by the three indirect method s<br />
which were previously discussed .<br />
The nominal mean residence time (Tm) ha s<br />
been computed for several harvested field -<br />
grown coniferous trees and the values compared<br />
with those obtained from curve slopes ,<br />
from first moment calculations and from peak<br />
arrival times . The results show in general, that<br />
Tm > TS for slope calculations and Tm <<br />
Tm * for first moment calculations .<br />
The nominal mean residence time agree s<br />
most closely with Tp which was obtained b y<br />
the midpeak or peak arrival time method .<br />
2 0<br />
I 0<br />
o ► 1 I I_ I 1<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 6000 110 120 13 0<br />
Tm(hr )<br />
Figure 2 . Relationship between nominal mean residence<br />
time (Tm) of plant water and mean residence<br />
time obtained by peak arrival (Tp) fro m<br />
activity-time curves .<br />
Figure 2 shows the relationship between T m<br />
and Tp for a group of harvested trees . Th e<br />
slope of the linear least squares relationshi p<br />
between the two estimates is 0 .916, and the<br />
intercept is 7 .05 as compared with the expected<br />
slope of one and expected intercept of<br />
zero (1 :1 line, fig. 2). The coefficient o f<br />
determination (r2 ) is 0.70 for the relationship.<br />
The results suggest that Tp is an unbiased<br />
estimator of Tm . This confirms that Tp<br />
is the best estimate available for Tm since<br />
other known possibilities have been examined<br />
and found to be biased either above or belo w<br />
the true values .<br />
The scatter of data points on figure 2 indicates<br />
that forest biomass determinations must<br />
C<br />
at present be approached statistically . Any<br />
particular determination of mean residenc e<br />
time of water may be substantially in error ;<br />
however, a group of determinations appear s<br />
to converge on the true Tm values of th e<br />
group. <strong>Experimental</strong> error reduction is on e<br />
objective of continuing studies in the Coniferous<br />
Biome program .<br />
Table 1 shows a comparison between tre e<br />
biomass as computed by equation 2 an d<br />
actual harvested weights. These data were obtained<br />
in a uniform age plantation of red pin e<br />
(Pinus resinosa) in 1970, and a similar stan d<br />
of jack pine (Pinus banksiana) in 1971. Th e<br />
results show individual examples of substantial<br />
error; however, the estimates of mean tre e<br />
biomass and mean forest biomass as measured<br />
by the tritium method agree well with thos e<br />
estimated by direct harvest . There is, of<br />
course, no necessity for determining biomas s<br />
of a group of trees on all individuals simultaneously<br />
. Biomass can be determined at an y<br />
time during which transpiration flow is takin g<br />
place. The results suggest that the biomass of<br />
these forests could have been reliably determined<br />
by the tritium method alone .<br />
Conclusions<br />
Experiments designed to measure transpiration<br />
rates in field-grown trees may also b e<br />
used with little extra data collection for non -<br />
destructively measuring tree biomass . The tritium<br />
method can, in general, be used only for<br />
determination of biomass which is actually<br />
transmitting water . Flowers, fruits, bark, and<br />
nonconducting heartwood are not included i n<br />
the estimate. We have proposed a method for<br />
including heartwood in the estimate but have<br />
not yet proved it experimentally .<br />
The most difficult parameter to obtain for<br />
calculation of biomass is the nominal mea n<br />
residence time of water in the plant . After<br />
examining several alternatives for obtainin g<br />
this quantity, we conclude from theory and<br />
experiment that the time of arrival of pea k<br />
tritium activity in tree foliage is the most reliable<br />
estimate of nominal mean residence time .<br />
Estimates of biomass of field-grown coniferous<br />
trees show considerable statistical varia -<br />
165
tion; however, the mean of a group of such<br />
determinations was a reliable and unbiase d<br />
estimate of the mean obtained by direct harvest.<br />
With additional research on the problem<br />
it may be possible to reduce the experimental<br />
error of the method and to improve the<br />
reliability of individual estimates .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The work reported in this paper was performed<br />
under the auspices of the U .S . Atomic<br />
Energy Commission and supported in part b y<br />
National Science Foundation Grant No .<br />
GB-20963 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome ,<br />
U .S . Analysis of Ecosystems, Internationa l<br />
Biological Program . This is Contribution No .<br />
32 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Bergner, P .-E . E. 1961 . Tracer dynamics: I .<br />
A tentative approach and definition of<br />
fundamental concepts . J. Theor. Biol. 2 :<br />
120-140 .<br />
. 1964a . Tracer dynamics and th e<br />
determination of pool sizes and turnove r<br />
factors in metabolic systems . J. Theor .<br />
Biol . 6 : 137-158 .<br />
. 1964b. Kinetic theory : Som e<br />
aspects on the study of metabolic processes<br />
. In R. M. Kniseley and W . N. Taux e<br />
(eds.), Dynamic clinical studies with radioisotopes,<br />
p. 1-18 . U .S. At. Energy Comm .<br />
TID-7678. Germantown, Md .<br />
. 1965 . Exchangeable mass :<br />
Determination without assumption of isotopic<br />
equilibrium . Science 150 : 1048-1050 .<br />
r . 1966. Tracer theory: A review .<br />
Isotope & Radiat . Tech . 3 : 245-262 .<br />
Donato, L ., C. Giuntini, R . Bianchi, and A .<br />
Maseri . 1964 . Quantitative radiocardiography<br />
for the measurement of pulmonary<br />
blood volume . In R. M. Kniseley<br />
and W. N. Tauxe (eds .), Dynamic clinical<br />
studies with radioisotopes, p . 267-283 . U .S .<br />
At. Energy Comm . TID-7678 . German -<br />
town, Md .<br />
Kline, J . R ., J. R. Martin, C . F . Jordan, and J .<br />
J. Koranda. 1970 . Measurement of transpiration<br />
in tropical trees using tritiate d<br />
water. Ecology 5(6) : 1068-1073 .<br />
Ljunggren, K . 1967. A review of the use of<br />
radioisotope tracers for evaluating parameters<br />
pertaining to the flow of materials in<br />
plant and natural systems. Isotope &<br />
Radiat. Tech. 5(1) : 3-24 .<br />
Orr, J. S., and F . C. Gillespie . 1968. Occupancy<br />
principle for radioactive tracers i n<br />
steady state biological systems . Scienc e<br />
162 : 138-139 .<br />
Zierler, K. L. 1964. Basic aspects of kineti c<br />
theory as applied to tracer distributio n<br />
studies . In R. M. Kniseley and W . N. Taux e<br />
(eds.), Dynamic clinical studies with radioisotopes,<br />
p . 55-79 . U .S . At. Energy Comm .<br />
TID-7678. Germantown, Md .<br />
166
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Theodolite surveying fo r<br />
nondestructive biomas s<br />
sampling<br />
Eugene E . Addor, Botanist<br />
U .S . Army Corps of Engineers<br />
Waterways Experiment Statio n<br />
Vicksburg, Mississippi 93180<br />
A bstract<br />
By theodolite surveying, the relative location of points in space may be calculated by triangulation . With th e<br />
aid of computers, data gathered by theodolite surveying may provide a dimensional analysis of individual trees.<br />
Because the system is nondestructive, the rates and patterns of change in the spatial structure of trees and stand s<br />
may be monitored by repetitive surveying. This paper presents a preliminary test of the approach upon trees in a<br />
40-year-old Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) plantation in western Washington. From experience gained in<br />
the initial experiment, recommendations are made to increase the precision of repetitive measurements .<br />
Introduction<br />
The theodolite is an instrument used in precise<br />
surveying to locate points in space by triangulation<br />
. The use of high speed computers<br />
for converting angle measurements to poin t<br />
locations allows theodolite surveying techniques<br />
to be used for describing the physical<br />
structure of vegetation assemblages in considerable<br />
detail with relative ease . Such a surveying<br />
procedure has been used to construc t<br />
simulation models for studying the effects of<br />
vegetation on engineering activities (West e t<br />
al . 1971) . Since the method is nondestructive ,<br />
it offers the possibility of repetitive samplin g<br />
with high inherent precision. Exploratory<br />
surveys were made recently to test the applicability<br />
of the system for this purpose (West<br />
and Allen 1971) . This paper examines som e<br />
data from a Douglas-fir stand at the Coniferous<br />
Biome intensive site in Washington .<br />
Description of the<br />
Surveying System<br />
The procedure requires two theodolite s<br />
placed at an arbitrary distance apart and located<br />
conveniently to the subject trees (fig .<br />
1) . The vertical and horizontal angles fro m<br />
each instrument to every point located in th e<br />
sample space are measured with respect to a<br />
base line. The instruments can be move d<br />
about to obtain clear lines-of-site to desire d<br />
points in the sample space and every instrument<br />
location (turning point) is referenced t o<br />
the base line by conventional traverse survey -<br />
Figure 1 . Instrument set-up for surveying spatia l<br />
structures of trees. Two theodolites are in use ; th e<br />
instrument in the middle is a spotting laser .<br />
167
ieoo --<br />
~e0o -<br />
I/00 -<br />
1200 -<br />
10o0 -<br />
u<br />
X<br />
N<br />
boo -<br />
eoo --<br />
40 0<br />
200<br />
0- /s.scm -.0-IA4 CM<br />
I I I I I I I I I I I I I l l I l l l l l l l l l<br />
-300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 3,<br />
Y AXIS, C M<br />
a . APRILMEASUREMENT<br />
b. OCTOBERMEASUREMENT<br />
Figure 2 . Graphic display of point location data from a Douglas-fir tree near Seattle, Washington, on whic h<br />
branching was not surveyed in detail . Bole graphed to show diameter to scale.<br />
168
ing methods . Every point in the sample spac e<br />
is thus located with respect to any arbitraril y<br />
defined three-coordinate system . Details of<br />
the procedure are presented elsewhere (West<br />
and Allen 1971) . 1<br />
One of the theodolites is equipped with a<br />
specially designed circular reticle for measuring<br />
branch or stem diameter, employing th e<br />
principle of stadia measurement . All measure d<br />
angles and reticle readings are recorded in th e<br />
field on specially designed data forms, an d<br />
trigonometric conversions of field data t o<br />
point locations and stem or branch diameter s<br />
are made by computer . Figure 2 is an exampl e<br />
of a computer graphic of one of the trees o n<br />
the Thompson site .<br />
Description of the Sample<br />
The Douglas-fir stand, located on the A. E .<br />
Thompson Research Area in the Cedar Rive r<br />
watershed, lies some 64 km southeast of<br />
Seattle, Washington . The Research Area is<br />
described in detail by Cole and Gessel (1968) .<br />
Measurements were obtained from a group o f<br />
eight contiguous trees on each of two proximate<br />
(not contiguous) permanent research<br />
plots (designated 1 and 2 on the Researc h<br />
Area) within an even-aged 40-year-old plantation<br />
. Plot 1 received three applications o f<br />
nitrogen as ammonium sulfate (NH 4 SO 4 at<br />
the rate of 222 kg/ha in October 1963 ,<br />
October 1964, and May 1970 . Plot 2 was left<br />
untreated as a control .<br />
The eight trees selected for measuremen t<br />
on each plot were selected first by choosin g<br />
an arbitrary point within each plot, and the n<br />
taking the eight trees nearest to each point a s<br />
sampling trees. The only controlling criterio n<br />
placed upon location of the starting point o n<br />
each plot was that it should be far enough<br />
within the plot to avoid inclusion of boundary<br />
trees in the sample . Measurements on the<br />
sample trees were made in April 1970, befor e<br />
bud burst, and then again in October 1970 ,<br />
after the apparent end of the growing season .<br />
Data were taken to include the coordinate<br />
location and the diameter (outside hark) at<br />
the following points :<br />
a) At the base of the tree, defined as being<br />
at the duff line or ground line, as wel l<br />
as could be determined . Diameters were<br />
measured with a tape .<br />
b) Diameters at breast height (d .b.h . )<br />
150 cm above the duff line were<br />
marked with a ribbon for subsequent<br />
remeasurement .<br />
c) The bole at every fourth whorl where<br />
limbs were still present (diameters wer e<br />
calculated from reticle readings) .<br />
d) The base of the live crown, defined as<br />
the lowermost whorl at which more<br />
than 50 percent of the branches hel d<br />
green leaves . The location of a whorl i s<br />
defined as the approximate centroid of<br />
branch emergence ; diameter measurements<br />
on the bole are made just below<br />
the lowermost branch as well as just<br />
above the uppermost branch of th e<br />
whorl (fig. 3). (Diameters calculated<br />
from reticle readings . )<br />
e) At every fourth branch whorl within<br />
the live crown, or at least one branc h<br />
whorl within the middle one-third of<br />
the live crown .<br />
f) The topmost whorl in April and that<br />
same whorl plus the new topmos t<br />
whorl in October .<br />
g) The top of the leader, at the base of th e<br />
terminal bud whorl .<br />
1 E . E . Addor and H . W . West. A technique fo r<br />
measuring the three-dimensional geometry of standing<br />
trees . U .S. Army Waterways Experiment Station ,<br />
Vicksburg, Mississippi . Unpublished .<br />
Figure 3. Definition of branch whorl location, an d<br />
location of diameter measurements at whorl .<br />
169
h) Point locations and diameters were<br />
measured for various defined points o n<br />
crown branches but will not be discussed<br />
here .<br />
A total of 30 turning points (instrument<br />
set-ups) were established for the April survey<br />
and all were referenced to a common coordinate<br />
system . The same points of reference<br />
were used again in October, but no deliberate<br />
attempt was made to duplicate the surveyin g<br />
sequence, e .g., to site each point on the tree<br />
and to measure each diameter from the same<br />
turning point . Nonetheless, the sequence tha t<br />
was adopted for the first survey was approximated<br />
during the second survey, as a result of<br />
constraints within the stand . Thus the<br />
sampled points were mostly viewed from th e<br />
sample angles during both surveys . Since both<br />
surveys were referenced to the same coordinate<br />
system, the reported coordinate locations<br />
of surveyed points are in theory exactl y<br />
comparable, so that any difference in th e<br />
reported location of a point represents a displacement<br />
of that point by wind action ,<br />
growth, or survey error .<br />
Results of<br />
Theodolite Survey<br />
Crown Cover and Stand Densit y<br />
The crown cover was essentially closed an d<br />
the branching structure relatively dense . The<br />
ground area occupied by the eight sample d<br />
trees on each plot was determined in April b y<br />
traversing the ground points representing th e<br />
outer crown limits of the outermost trees o f<br />
the group . The crown coverage so determine d<br />
was 31 .2 m 2 on plot 2 (unfertilized) an d<br />
44 .0 m 2 on plot 1 (fertilized) representing a<br />
crown area per tree of 3 .9 m 2 and 5 .5 m 2 ,<br />
respectively, or a density of approximatel y<br />
2,567 and 1,818 trees per hectare .<br />
In this same stand, in October, 1965, Dic e<br />
(1970) destructively analyzed 10 trees from a<br />
0.0045-hectare (45 m 2 ) plot, which is 4 .5 m 2<br />
per tree, or approximately 2,222 trees per<br />
hectare . These values lie reasonably between<br />
our values for the unfertilized and fertilized<br />
trees. Unfortunately we are not certain ho w<br />
the crown boundaries of his trees relate to th e<br />
boundaries of his 45 m 2 plot .<br />
The problem of the true relation of the<br />
crown cover per tree (tree mean area) to<br />
sample plot boundaries is controversial (Greig -<br />
Smith 1964) . Supposedly, tree randomness<br />
with respect to sample-plot boundaries should<br />
balance the excluded and included portions of<br />
included and excluded trees, but the true relation<br />
is apparently complicated by both plot<br />
size and plot shape . A crown-limit traverse is<br />
relatively simple with a theodolite survey and<br />
is easily converted to area by the computer . It<br />
should therefore be worthwhile to examine<br />
whether such a procedure would resolve th e<br />
problem of the relation between sample plo t<br />
boundary and tree crown boundary in th e<br />
determination of crown cover, stand density ,<br />
or tree mean area .<br />
Patterns in Diameter Measurement s<br />
Examination of the diameter data from th e<br />
theodolite survey suggests that the unfertilized<br />
trees exhibited greater increment on th e<br />
upper portion of the bole than on the lower ,<br />
whereas the fertilized trees showed approximately<br />
equal growth pattern throughout th e<br />
length of the bole . Such patterns seem reason -<br />
able because of the difference in / stan d<br />
density. Similar patterns have been reporte d<br />
in unthinned and thinned stands of Douglas -<br />
fir surveyed with an optical dendrometer over<br />
a 2-year period (Groman and Berg 1971) .<br />
Certain sources of inaccuracies in diameter<br />
measurements with the theodolite syste m<br />
should be mentioned . First, diameters calculated<br />
from reticle readings are dependen t<br />
upon accurate measurements of the distance .<br />
Second, interpolation errors from this source<br />
may be important when estimating smal l<br />
branch diameters with the reticle . Countering<br />
these disadvantages is the possibility of<br />
measuring diameter at any point on a stem or<br />
branch regardless of the direction or angle of<br />
inclination . Other instruments such as the<br />
optical dendrometer have no reticle inscripted<br />
and thus are restricted to measuring bole<br />
diameter.<br />
170
Patterns in Point Displacemen t<br />
Measuring changes in the physical structur e<br />
of vegetation consists primarily of simply<br />
measuring the displacement of defined points<br />
over a specified time interval . Obviously, an<br />
error in determining the location of a poin t<br />
either at the beginning or at the end of th e<br />
time interval will result in an error in th e<br />
measurement of displacement .<br />
Measurement errors may stem from a<br />
variety of sources, depending upon th e<br />
methods of measurement . Since theodolite<br />
surveying is dependent upon calculation o f<br />
point locations by trigonometric relations ,<br />
both instruments must be precisely sighted o n<br />
the spot to be located . Disparities in th e<br />
assumed location of the target point wil l<br />
cause errors in the calculated location of th e<br />
point. Horizontal disparities will cause horizontal<br />
and vertical errors according to th e<br />
angle of convergence and the slope of lines-ofsite,<br />
while a vertical disparity will not locate a<br />
point at all .<br />
To reduce errors from this cause, a spottin g<br />
laser (fig. 1) can be used to project a bright<br />
orange spot a few millimeters in diameter<br />
onto the tree at the selected target point . Thi s<br />
provides a definitive target for sighting th e<br />
theodolites at one given time, but it does not<br />
resolve the problem of relocating the exact<br />
point of measurement for periodic remeasurement<br />
. The spotting laser was at the Thompson<br />
Site during both the April and October<br />
surveys, but it was inoperable much of the<br />
time. Periods of its use and nonuse may<br />
account for some of the patterns in the data .<br />
Other sources of error include the usua l<br />
reading and transcription errors by instrument<br />
men and note keepers. Errors from these<br />
various sources may or may not be critical ,<br />
depending upon their magnitude and frequency,<br />
and the special purpose for which th e<br />
survey is being made . For the purpose of<br />
monitoring subtle changes in the vegetation<br />
structure over a brief time period, even ver y<br />
small errors may be important . Gross<br />
anomalies in the data may be identified and<br />
approximately corrected during data editing<br />
and preliminary analysis, but small error s<br />
regardless of source may not be distinguish -<br />
able from true displacement.<br />
For the purpose of discussion, any difference<br />
between the calculated location of a<br />
defined point from one observation to<br />
another (specifically, for the present case ,<br />
from April to October), in any coordinat e<br />
direction, may be defined as an "apparent displacement"<br />
of that point in that direction . I t<br />
can then be defined that the apparent displacement<br />
always consists of two components<br />
: True displacement resulting fro m<br />
changes in the shapes of the trees, and errors<br />
resulting from inaccuracies and mistakes i n<br />
instrument reading, note keeping, and calcula -<br />
tions . Hereinafter, these latter will be referred<br />
to collectively as "survey error ." The question<br />
to be resolved, then, is what proportion o f<br />
apparent displacement can be attributed t o<br />
each of these two components . Data from the<br />
surveyed Douglas-fir stand provide a n<br />
opportunity to examine the theodolite<br />
surveying system with respect to thes e<br />
problems .<br />
Figure 4 is a set of graphs of the apparent<br />
displacement in the xy (horizontal) plant of<br />
defined points at various levels on the tree<br />
boles, as measured from April to October .<br />
They are : (A) at the base of the tree, (B) at<br />
the base of the live crown, (C) at an arbitrary<br />
intracrown whorl, and (D) at the whorl that<br />
was defined as the topmost whorl in Apri l<br />
(i .e., at the base of the April leader, three<br />
trees are omitted from the intracrown whorl<br />
data due to omissions in the survey) . With few<br />
exceptions, the apparent displacement in the<br />
horizontal plane at the base of the tree i s<br />
within plus or minus 3 cm, with a slight systematic<br />
bias in the positive x direction and in<br />
the negative y direction, but with the points<br />
for the unfertilized and fertilized trees reason -<br />
ably well interspersed . Since trees are<br />
anchored at the base, it may be assumed that<br />
any apparent displacement of the tree axis in<br />
the horizontal plane at that level must represent<br />
a surveying error . Therefore this sligh t<br />
systematic error at this level on these tree s<br />
may be interpreted as a horizontal error i n<br />
relocating the established origin of the coordinate<br />
system. The absence of a separation i n<br />
this plane at this level between the apparent<br />
displacement of the unfertilized and fertilize d<br />
171
+10<br />
q<br />
A<br />
0 -29 ~---o-- -<br />
D<br />
-A &A<br />
>.<br />
o"f<br />
I<br />
0 0<br />
o<br />
o FERTILIZE D<br />
q UNFERTILIZE D<br />
I I 1<br />
1<br />
q +37<br />
o<br />
-~<br />
-1 0<br />
1 q + 1 9<br />
o--><br />
of<br />
0<br />
I 1<br />
-10 0 +10 -10<br />
APPARENT DISPLACEMENT, C M<br />
0<br />
(x)<br />
+10<br />
Figure 4 . Apparent displacement of the tree boles in x and y (the horizontal plane) at various levels on th e<br />
sampled trees, from April to October : (A) at the base of the trees, (B) at the base of the live crowns, (C) a t<br />
an intracrown whorl, (D) at the base of the April leader (based on data from table 2 in West and Allen 1971) .<br />
172
trees indicates that the coordinate system wa s<br />
surveyed across the intervening distance between<br />
the two plots (about 20 m) with negligible<br />
error in this plane. If the data are adjusted<br />
for the horizontal error in relocation of<br />
the coordinate system origin, then the displacement<br />
error is quite small, and it must b e<br />
conceded that remeasurement of the horizontal<br />
angles to the trees has been achieve d<br />
with a fair degree of success, despite the 3 0<br />
turning points used in accomplishing th e<br />
survey .<br />
Two explanations may be suggested for th e<br />
increasing scatter of points in the horizontal<br />
plane with increasing height on the tree ,<br />
shown on figure 4B, C, and D. First, it may be<br />
assumed that surveying errors have increase d<br />
with increasing elevation of lines-of-site, or<br />
second, it may be assumed that the positio n<br />
of the boles are less stable in the horizontal<br />
plane at higher levels on the tree . Since point<br />
locations in the horizontal plane are calculated<br />
from horizontal angles, irrespective of<br />
angles of elevation, there is no reason t o<br />
assume that surveying errors should increas e<br />
in relation to elevation. It follows therefore<br />
that errors in the location of points in th e<br />
horizontal plane at any elevation might b e<br />
equal to, but should not exceed, the errors in<br />
location of the base of the trees in this plane .<br />
It follows in turn that the apparent horizonta l<br />
displacement of points on the upper boles of<br />
these trees must be a true displacement . The<br />
pattern is consistent with what would b e<br />
expected as a result of movement of the trees<br />
by wind .<br />
Figure 5 is a set of graphs of the apparent<br />
displacement of z (the vertical plane, or elevation)<br />
for the same defined points on the bol e<br />
that are shown on figure 4, respectively .<br />
These show a considerable scatter in th e<br />
apparent vertical displacement at the base o f<br />
the live crown, moderate scatter in apparen t<br />
vertical displacement at the intracrown whorl ,<br />
and again a relatively close clustering of<br />
apparent displacement at the base of the April<br />
leader .<br />
This pattern of variation may be attributed<br />
to relative differences in the difficulty o f<br />
identifying the defined points with respect<br />
to elevation. This difficulty is more or less<br />
inherent in the definition of the points ; that is<br />
to say that "at or near the duff or ground<br />
line" is less definitive than is "the centroid of<br />
the branch whorl," whereas the topmos t<br />
whorl (base of the leader) is the smallest an d<br />
most definitive of the defined points. The<br />
differences in vertical scatter of points for th e<br />
base of the live crowns and for the intracrow n<br />
whorl may be attributed to errors of approximating<br />
the exact elevational location of th e<br />
latter through obscuring branches and foliage .<br />
These inconsistencies of identification hav e<br />
important implications with regard to measurement<br />
of length relations, such as the tota l<br />
height of trees or the ratio of bole length t o<br />
length of live crown (although, of course, th e<br />
significance of the implication is determine d<br />
by the magnitude of the dimensions and th e<br />
special purpose for which the relations ar e<br />
being measured) .<br />
It was observed above that the apparent<br />
displacement of defined points on the unfertilized<br />
and the fertilized trees were reasonably<br />
well interspersed with respect to the horizontal<br />
plane . With respect to elevation, how -<br />
ever, the data exhibit systematic tendencie s<br />
that require explanation . Specifically, figure<br />
5B shows a seemingly strong tendency toward<br />
a positive apparent displacement of about 6<br />
or 7 cm for the base of live crowns on th e<br />
fertilized trees, while the apparent displacement<br />
of this point on the unfertilized trees<br />
appears to be randomly dispersed about zero .<br />
A possible explanation is that a vertical error<br />
was committed in extending the coordinat e<br />
system across the distance (approximatel y<br />
20 m) between the two groups of trees . However,<br />
if this were the case, then the sam e<br />
apparent vertical displacement must occur a t<br />
all other levels on the fertilized trees ; if it<br />
does not, then its absence from other level s<br />
must be accounted for . The data for the intracrown<br />
whorl (fig. 5C), though somewhat<br />
more scattered than the data for the base o f<br />
live crown, do indeed suggest a similar disparity<br />
between central tendencies for the tw o<br />
groups of trees, but a similar disparity is no t<br />
obvious at the base of the trees (fig . 5A), nor<br />
at the base of the April leaders (fig . 5D) . It<br />
may be that for the base of the tree, the disparity<br />
is simply obscured by the scatter of the<br />
173
30<br />
2 2 0<br />
V<br />
A B C D<br />
0<br />
q<br />
0 q<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
q 0<br />
A&<br />
II<br />
0<br />
A<br />
0 FERTILIZE D<br />
q UNFERTILIZE D<br />
-30<br />
Figure 5 . Apparent displacement of points on the tree boles in x and y as a function of z (elevation), from Apri l<br />
to October: (A) at the base of the trees, (B) at the base of the live crowns, (C) at an intracrown whorl, (D) a t<br />
the base of the April leader (based on data from table 2 in West and Allen 1971) .<br />
174
data; there is no obvious explanation for it s<br />
absence at the base of the April leader .<br />
Conclusions<br />
The preliminary survey of Douglas-fir tree s<br />
at the Thompson Site suggests that theodolite<br />
surveying is adaptable to the purpose o f<br />
detecting and monitoring subtle patterns o f<br />
change in vegetation structures . In terms of<br />
quantity and quality of data obtained for th e<br />
energy expended, this procedure appears t o<br />
be commensurate with any other known tre e<br />
measurement system, and it offers advantage s<br />
not offered by any other system . First, be -<br />
cause the location of every point in the<br />
sample is determined relative to an arbitrar y<br />
point defined as the origin of the coordinate<br />
system, the apparent displacement of any<br />
point on the tree is independent of th e<br />
apparent location of any other point on th e<br />
tree. Second, displacement of points in any<br />
direction can be measured with this procedure,<br />
such as, for example, the tips o f<br />
branches radially disposed about the stem an d<br />
growing at various angles from the vertical .<br />
Finally, and of considerable importance, thi s<br />
system is entirely nondestructive and is there -<br />
fore well suited to continued monitoring o f<br />
growth trends over extended time periods .<br />
Theoretically, the precision of the technique<br />
is within millimeters, since it is basicall y<br />
the same as is used for precision engineerin g<br />
surveying. There are, however, a few practica l<br />
limitations on the attainable precision .<br />
Following are a few observations about particular<br />
problems .<br />
A possible solution to the problem of<br />
target point identification would be to clim b<br />
the trees prior to the initial survey and afi x<br />
permanent sighting targets at points of interest.<br />
Also, a network of similarly smal l<br />
definitive targets could be establishe d<br />
throughout the sample area for use as permanent<br />
reference points, one of which could b e<br />
used to define the origin of the coordinate<br />
system. A series of carefully controlled<br />
experiments should be designed specifically t o<br />
determine the effects of operator error on the<br />
limits of attainable precision under different<br />
kinds of working conditions .<br />
Dense crown branches and foliage may<br />
place constraints on the usefulness or convenience<br />
of this method in some kinds o f<br />
vegetation.<br />
When precision is required, surveyin g<br />
should be avoided during periods of adverse<br />
weather conditions. Tarpaulins can be suspended<br />
over the instruments so that work<br />
may be carried on during rain or snow, but<br />
these conditions also affect visibility within<br />
the forest . Winds that are strong enough to<br />
cause movement of the trees will obviously<br />
increase the probability of meaningless<br />
apparent displacements, and should be<br />
avoided .<br />
As of this writing, the system has been use d<br />
exclusively for the dimensioning of trees . Th e<br />
principles upon which it is based, however ,<br />
are universally applicable mathematical relations.<br />
Therefore the technique should b e<br />
eminently suited to the study of a variety o f<br />
ecological problems involving relations that<br />
can be described in a three-coordinate system .<br />
These might include, for example, the structure<br />
of bird rookeries, the spatial arrangemen t<br />
of epiphyte or parasite plants, or flower and<br />
fruit distributions .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The work on which this paper is based wa s<br />
authorized and financed by the Recreation and<br />
Environmental Branch, Office of the Chief of<br />
Engineers, Washington, D .C., in cooperation<br />
with the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome, U .S. Analysis<br />
of Ecosystems, International Biological Program.<br />
This is Contribution No . 33 to the<br />
Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome. I thank my referees ,<br />
whose constructive criticisms were helpful in<br />
arriving at tenable explanations for some perplexing<br />
patterns in the data .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Cole, D . W., and S. P. Gessel . 1968 . Ceda r<br />
River research-a program for studyin g<br />
pathways, rates, and processes of elementa l<br />
cycling in a forest ecosystem . Univ . Wash .<br />
Coll. For . Res . Monogr . Contr. No . 4, 53 p .<br />
175
Dice, Steven F . 1970. The biomass and nutrient<br />
flux in a second growth Douglas-fir ecosystem<br />
(a study in quantitative ecology) .<br />
53 p. Ph.D. thesis on file, Univ . Wash . ,<br />
Seattle .<br />
Greig-Smith, P . 1964 . Quantitative plan t<br />
ecology. Ed. 2, 256 p., illus . Washington ,<br />
D.C . : Butterworths .<br />
Groman, William A ., and Alan B. Berg . 1971 .<br />
Optical dendrometer measurement of increment<br />
characteristics on the boles of<br />
Douglas-fir in thinned and unthinned<br />
stands. Northwest Sci . 45(3) : 171-177 .<br />
and H. H . Allen . 1971. A technique<br />
for quantifying forest stands fo r<br />
management evaluations . U .S . Army Eng .<br />
Waterways Exp . Stn. Tech . Rep . M-71-9 ,<br />
29 p ., illus .<br />
West, H . W ., R . R . Friesz, E . A. Dardeau, Jr . ,<br />
and others . 1971 . Environmental characterization<br />
of munitions test sites : Vol. 1 ,<br />
Techniques and analysis of data . U .S. Army<br />
Eng. Waterways Exp . Stn. Tech. Rep .<br />
M-71-3, 31 p ., illus .<br />
176
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Estimates of biomass and fixed<br />
nitrogen of epiphytes from<br />
old growth Douglas fir<br />
Lawrence H . Pike and Diane M . Tracy<br />
Department of Botan y<br />
Oregon State Universit y<br />
Corvallis, Orego n<br />
Martha A . Sherwoo d<br />
Department of Biology<br />
University of Orego n<br />
Eugene, Orego n<br />
Diane Nielse n<br />
Division of Ecology and Systematic s<br />
Cornell University<br />
Ithaca, New Yor k<br />
bstract -<br />
Epiphytes are sampled concurrently with measurements of surface area of trunk and branch systems of<br />
old-growth Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) . Crude predictions of epiphyte biomass in branch systems are<br />
corrected by more detailed sampling of a subset of branch systems. Nitrogen analyses enable conversion of<br />
epiphyte biomass to the total amount of nitrogen present in the epiphytes.<br />
Introduction<br />
Epiphytic lichens and mosses are a conspicuous<br />
component of forest ecosystems in th e<br />
Pacific Northwest . Because of their ability t o<br />
concentrate materials from the environment<br />
and the ability of some of them to fi x<br />
atmospheric nitrogen, their importance i n<br />
nutrient cycling within the system may be<br />
greater than their contribution to total biomass<br />
would suggest .<br />
In old-growth Douglas-fir forests, epiphyt e<br />
biomass is expected to be in a steady state ;<br />
epiphyte growth is balanced by litterfall, in<br />
situ decomposition, and consumption b y<br />
herbivores. Annual turnover of epiphytic<br />
lichens varies from 5 to 25 percent (Edward s<br />
et al. 1960, Pike 1971) .<br />
Epiphyte-fixed nitrogen accounts, at least<br />
in part, for the nitrogen needed for th e<br />
growth of these epiphytes, and may represen t<br />
a significant input to the forest ecosystem .<br />
Nitrogen is added to water flowing over tre e<br />
surfaces through decomposition of epiphyte s<br />
and leakage from nitrogen-fixing epiphytes ,<br />
and enters the soil from the epiphyte syste m<br />
via throughfall, stemflow, and litterfall .<br />
Measurements of biomass are necessary t o<br />
relate process studies of epiphytes to thei r<br />
contribution to forest mineral cycles on an<br />
ecosystem level . Estimating epiphyte biomass<br />
by felling and sampling selected trees is<br />
neither possible nor desirable in old-growt h<br />
Douglas-fir forests (where trees may approac h<br />
100 m in height) because such felling i s<br />
destructive, not only of the host tree, but also<br />
of the epiphytes one wishes to study .<br />
This paper outlines the methods and give s<br />
177
preliminary results of techniques develope d<br />
for sampling epiphytes on old-growt h<br />
Douglas-fir in the H . J. <strong>Andrews</strong> Experimenta l<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> . The relatively nondestructive samplin g<br />
is an extension of the procedure for estimating<br />
tree structure and biomass described b y<br />
Denison et al . (1972) .<br />
The Study Tree<br />
Methods<br />
Epiphyte sampling by the methods de -<br />
scribed here has been carried out on a single<br />
old-growth Douglas-fir tree . This tree i s<br />
located on a north-facing slope in watershe d<br />
10 of the H . J. <strong>Andrews</strong> <strong>Experimental</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> ,<br />
75 km east of Eugene, Oregon . The base of<br />
this 65 m tall tree is at an elevation of 500 m .<br />
The surrounding stand of old-growth Douglas -<br />
fir has an understory which includes wester n<br />
hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) and vine mapl e<br />
(Acer circinatum) . Epiphytic lichens an d<br />
bryophytes are present on the understory<br />
trees and shrubs as well as the overstory<br />
Douglas-fir .<br />
Sampling of Epiphytes<br />
For sampling, the tree was divided into<br />
trunk(s) and branch systems . The trunk is the<br />
main vertical axis of the tree ; branch systems<br />
are sets of branches leaving the trunk at the<br />
same point and are made up of axes (>4 c m<br />
in diameter) and branchlets (
where C is the percentage cover by epiphytes ,<br />
r is the radius at the base of the axis, and h i s<br />
the length of the axis . The bulk of epiphyte<br />
biomass for these branch systems is assume d<br />
to occur on the axes; if this is not the case ,<br />
the biomass of epiphytes on the many small<br />
branch systems, which are made up entirely<br />
of branchlets, may be significantly underestimated<br />
.<br />
Since EIV is based partly on subjective estimates<br />
of length of axes and percentage cove r<br />
by epiphytes, the relationship between EI V<br />
and epiphyte biomass may be expected t o<br />
vary from worker to worker and from sampling<br />
period to sampling period, and for thi s<br />
reason will be treated separately for each tree .<br />
However, it should be possible to correct<br />
importance values so that correlations may be<br />
obtained that will hold across a set of trees .<br />
Sampling Branch Systems<br />
The basic sampling unit for epiphytes o n<br />
axes in the branch systems is a "cylindrat, "<br />
which is analagous to a quadrat but runs completely<br />
around the axis so that two edges ar e<br />
fused . Our 1 dm cylindrats include the entir e<br />
surface for a distance of 1 dm along an axis .<br />
Thus the surface area of the cylindrat varies ,<br />
depending on the diameter of the axis in th e<br />
region sampled .<br />
Cylindrats were spaced along an axis with a<br />
distance of 4 dm from the center of on e<br />
cylindrat to the center of the next . Th e<br />
distance from the trunk to the first cylindra t<br />
sampled along a main axis was varied from 0<br />
to 1, 2, and 3 dm so as to avoid errors whic h<br />
would be introduced by horizontal zonation<br />
on the axis near its origin from the trunk .<br />
Estimates of epiphyte cover were made, an d<br />
then the epiphytes were stripped from th e<br />
cylindrat and bagged . Axis diameter at th e<br />
center of each cylindrat was measured t o<br />
enable calculation of surface area of the axes .<br />
Branchlets (
anch system . Total epiphyte weight for a<br />
branch system is the sum of the weights o n<br />
axes and on branchlets .<br />
Nitrogen Analyse s<br />
Samples analyzed for nitrogen conten t<br />
were collected in watershed 10 in August an d<br />
October 1971 . Samples were air dried, an d<br />
nitrogen analyses were performed by Denni s<br />
Lavender of the <strong>Forest</strong>ry Sciences Laboratory,<br />
Oregon State University, using th e<br />
Kjeldahl method . Air drying samples analyze d<br />
for nitrogen content avoids losses of nitroge n<br />
that may occur with ovendrying . In order to<br />
enable expression of the nitrogen contents o n<br />
an ovendry-weight basis, air dried samples of<br />
epiphytes were ovendried at 100 0 C to determine<br />
weight loss on drying .<br />
Results<br />
The results presented here are preliminary<br />
results from the first tree sampled in water -<br />
shed 10 of the H . J. <strong>Andrews</strong> Experimenta l<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> . The estimates are crude . They are presented<br />
to give an idea of how the methodology<br />
is being applied and the order of magnitude<br />
of results that are being obtained . Thes e<br />
preliminary results are being used in improving<br />
and refining the sampling strategy .<br />
Biomass of Epiphytes on the Trun k<br />
Total epiphyte biomass on the trunks of<br />
tree 1 is estimated to be 4.5 kg (table 1) .<br />
Nearly 90 percent of this is bryophytes, an d<br />
nearly 50 percent is found within 8 m of th e<br />
ground. Lichens contribute the bulk of th e<br />
epiphyte biomass on the trunk from about 5 0<br />
to 60 m from the ground . Epiphyte biomas s<br />
per unit area for the trunk as a whole i s<br />
0.31 g/dm 2 , and is much higher than thi s<br />
figure only within 8 m of the ground and a t<br />
the top of the second trunk, where large<br />
patches of Lobaria oregana (Tuck.) Mull. Arg.<br />
were encountered .<br />
Biomass of Epiphytes on the Branch System s<br />
The frequency distribution of branch sys -<br />
tems by EIV is presented in figure 1 .<br />
Epiphyte biomass on axes of the five<br />
branch systems sampled in detail ranged fro m<br />
0 to 198 g (table 2) ; that on the branchlets<br />
ranged from 1 to 48 g (table 3) . The five<br />
branch systems show a relationship betwee n<br />
EIV and epiphyte biomass (fig . 2) . Values<br />
from the least-squares regression line wer e<br />
used to convert the number of branch system s<br />
in an EIV class to an estimate of the tota l<br />
epiphyte biomass represented by that clas s<br />
(fig. 3) .<br />
The low importance value classes<br />
(EIV < 10 ), although representing man y<br />
branch systems, make only a small contribution<br />
to the epiphyte totals for the tree . Abou t<br />
one-half of the epiphyte biomass is contributed<br />
by branch systems with EIV abov e<br />
35 . In this connection, the preliminary nature<br />
of these results must again be emphasized a s<br />
no branch system with an EIV higher than 3 2<br />
was selected for detailed sampling .<br />
Epiphyte Biomass for the Whole Tre e<br />
Total epiphyte biomass for the tre e<br />
sampled is estimated to be 18 .3 kg ; 13 .8 kg ,<br />
or about 75 percent of the total, is on the<br />
branch systems (table 4) . Assuming that the<br />
distribution of epiphyte biomass by specie s<br />
on the five branch systems studied is the sam e<br />
as the distribution overall, 50 percent of the<br />
total epiphyte biomass for the tree is bryophytes<br />
(table 4) . However, there is a decrease<br />
in the proportion of total epiphyte weight<br />
represented by bryophytes from larger<br />
diameter to smaller diameter stem sections .<br />
Bryophytes make up 86 percent of th e<br />
epiphyte biomass on the trunk, 47 percent of<br />
that on the axes of the branch systems<br />
(>4 cm diameter), and only 3 percent of that<br />
on the branchlets (
Table 1.-Epiphyte biomass on the trunk of tree 1 in watershed 10 '<br />
Species<br />
y<br />
Heigh t<br />
(m)<br />
Trunk<br />
surface<br />
area<br />
L<br />
tl " o<br />
rz es<br />
CI .o0<br />
o<br />
tl tl<br />
tlb0<br />
o<br />
~l o<br />
All<br />
species<br />
din '<br />
g<br />
g<br />
g/dm z<br />
TRUNK 1 :<br />
0-4 1,500 300 470 340 + 1,120 0 .75<br />
4-8 1,240 80 210 740 - 1,040 .83<br />
8-12 1,130 20 200 90 30 340 .30<br />
12-16 1,110 50 150 40 20 + 270 .24<br />
16-20 1,060 140 140 70 20 360 .34<br />
20-24 1,010 20 110 10 - 10 - - 150 .1 5<br />
24-28 960 + + 10 -- 10 .0 1<br />
28-32 900 20 60 20 90 .1 0<br />
32-36 860 + 10 10 + + 20 .0 2<br />
36-40 820 200 30 50 + + 290 .3 6<br />
40-44 750 + + + + 10 .0 1<br />
44-48 670 10 110 10 130 .1 9<br />
48-52 580 + 30 + + + 40 .0 7<br />
52-56 490 + + + 10 50 - 70 .1 3<br />
56-60 402 - 50 10 -- + 60 .1 4<br />
60-63 250 70 10 10 + 10 - 100 .3 9<br />
TRUNK 2 :<br />
41-4 5 440 10 + 10 - + - + - 10 .0 3<br />
45-49 310 60 + 20 - - 10 - 90 .28<br />
49-51 120 - + + - - 10 + 10 310 330 2 .84<br />
Total 14,610 850 1,570 1,480 120 20 10 110 20 10 10 320 4,530<br />
' Weights for each species of epiphyte are to the closest 10 g ; + indicates the presence of less than 5 g .<br />
Entries have been rounded and will not necessarily add to the total .<br />
18 1
Table 2.-Epiphyte biomass on axes of branch systems sampled '<br />
Branc h<br />
system<br />
Distance from<br />
beginning of axis<br />
Section of axi s<br />
Diamete r<br />
at base<br />
Surface<br />
area<br />
Epiphyte biomas s<br />
dm cm dm 2 g/dm 2 g<br />
7 2<br />
33 0-3 .5 9 .0 9 .62 0 0<br />
3.5-7 .5 8 .5 10 .37 0 0<br />
7.5-11 .5 8 .0 9 .74 .01 . 1<br />
11.5-15 .5 7 .5 8 .80 .02 . 2<br />
15.5-19 .5 6 .5 8 .17 .02 . 1<br />
19.5-23 .5 6 .5 7 .38 .02 . 1<br />
23.5-27 .5 5 .2 6 .28 .02 . 1<br />
27.5-31 .5 4 .8 5 .66 .02 . 1<br />
31.5-33 .5 4 .2 2 .59 .04 . 1<br />
Total 68 .6 . 9<br />
61 0-2 .5 8 .0 6 .28 .24 1 . 5<br />
2.5-4 .5 8 .0 5 .34 .30 1 . 6<br />
4.5-8 .5 9 .0 11 .00 .31 3 . 4<br />
8.5-12 .5 8 .5 10 .21 2 .50 25 . 6<br />
12.5-16 .5 7 .8 9 .27 2 .97 27 . 6<br />
16.5-18 .5 7 .0 4 .30 1 .48 6 . 4<br />
0-3 .0* 4 .5 4 .01 .25 1 . 0<br />
Total 50 .4 67 . 1<br />
93 0-1 .5 12 .0 5 .54 .52 2 . 9<br />
1.5-5 .5 11 .5 14 .14 1 .13 16 . 0<br />
5.5-9 .5 11 .0 13 .35 1 .17 15 . 7<br />
9.5-13 .5 10 .2 11 .94 .97 11 . 5<br />
13.5-17 .5 8 .8 11 .15 1 .30 14 . 4<br />
17.5-21 .5 9 .0 11 .15 1 .68 18 . 7<br />
21.5-25 .5 8 .8 10 .52 2 .03 21 . 4<br />
25.5-29 .5 8 .0 9 .11 1 .28 11 . 1<br />
29.5-33 .5 6 .5 8 .48 1 .40 11 . 8<br />
33.5-37 .5 7 .0 8 .80 2 .26 19 . 9<br />
37.5-41 .5 7 .0 7 .39 1 .38 10 . 2<br />
41.5-45 .5 4 .8 5 .97 2 .25 13 . 4<br />
45.5-49 .5 4 .8 5 .81 2 .39 13 . 9<br />
49.5-53 .5 4 .5 5 .34 .54 2 . 9<br />
53.5-56 .0 4 .0 3 .14 .36 1 . 1<br />
0-2 .0* 6 .5 4 .01 .23 . 9<br />
2.0-6.0* 6 .2 7 .38 .35 2 . 6<br />
6.0-10.0* 5 .5 6 .28 .26 1 . 7<br />
10.0-14.0* 4 .5 5 .34 .10 . 5<br />
0-4.0** 4 .5 5 .34 1 .38 7 . 3<br />
Total 160 .2 198 . 0<br />
116 0-2 .5 10 .0 7 .66 .04 . 3<br />
2.5-6 .5 9 .5 11 .50 .23 2 . 6<br />
6.5-10 .5 8 .8 10 .56 .37 3 . 9<br />
10.5-14 .5 8 .0 9 .55 .67 6 . 4<br />
14.5-18 .5 7 .2 8 .61 .69 6 . 0<br />
18.5-22 .5 6 .5 7 .67 .25 2 . 0<br />
22.5-26 .5 5 .7 6 .72 .26 1 . 7<br />
26.5-30 .5 5 .0 5 .78 .24 1 . 4<br />
30.5-32 .0 4 .2 1 .93 .12 . 2<br />
Total 70 .0 24 .4<br />
1 Asterisks (*, * *) denote secondary axes .<br />
2 No axes greater than 4 cm diameter .<br />
182
NZ. 4<br />
50 100 150<br />
EPIPHYTE IMPORTANCE VALU E<br />
Figure 1 . Frequency distribution of branch systems by epiphyte importance value . EIV is an estimate of th e<br />
total area (dm 2 ) covered by epiphytes on the axes of the branch system .<br />
Table 3 .-Number of branchlets and epiphyte weights on branchlets<br />
for branch systems sampled from tree 1 in watershed 1 0<br />
Total weight of<br />
Branch Number of epiphytes on Mean epiphyte Total number of<br />
system branchlets branchlet number weight per branchlets in<br />
number sampled - branchlet branch system<br />
1 2 3<br />
Estimate d<br />
total weight of<br />
epiphytes on<br />
branchlet s<br />
g ----- - g g<br />
7 1 0.40 0.40 3 1 . 2<br />
33 3 .01 0 .08 0 .51 .20 13.5 ± 1 .5 1 2 . 7<br />
61 1 15 .99 15 .99 3 48 . 0<br />
93 1 4 .14 4 .14 4 16 . 6<br />
116 3 .14 5 .62 1 .72 2.48 12.5 ± 1 .5' 31 .0<br />
' Estimated . Total number of branchlets not recorded .<br />
18 3
1 .5<br />
50<br />
EPIPHYTE IMPORTANCE VALU E<br />
Figure 2 . Relationship between epiphyte importance value and total epiphyte biomass for the five branc h<br />
200 -<br />
•<br />
T<br />
0 10 2 0<br />
EPIPHYTE IMPORTANCE VALU E<br />
Figure 3 . Estimates of total epiphyte biomass on the branch systems in each EIV class .<br />
184
Table 4.-Biomass estimates (kg) for epiphytes on trun k<br />
and branch systems of tree 1 in watershed 1 0<br />
Branch system s<br />
Epiphyte Trunk Total<br />
Axes<br />
Branchlets<br />
BRYOPHYTES<br />
Hypnum circinale 1 .6 2 .6 4. 2<br />
Dicranum spp . 1 .5 1 .5 3. 0<br />
Other mosses .1 0 .1 . 2<br />
Scapania bolanderi .8 .1 1 . 0<br />
Other liverworts .5 . 6<br />
Bryophyte total 3 .9 4 .9 .1 8.9<br />
LICHEN S<br />
Sphaerophorus globosus .1 1 .8 1 . 9<br />
Other lichens with green<br />
algal phycobionts .2 .4 .3 . 9<br />
Lobaria oregana .3 3.2 3 .0 6 . 5<br />
Other lichens with Nostoc<br />
phycobionts .1 . 1<br />
Lichen total .6 5 .4 3 .4 9 . 4<br />
TOTAL 4 .5 10 .3 3 .5 18 .3<br />
a much higher nitrogen content than thos e<br />
which do not (table 5). In two of these associations,<br />
Lobaria oregana and Peltigera<br />
aphthosa (L.) Willd ., Nostoc is a secondary<br />
phycobiont located in cephalodia. Levels of<br />
nitrogen in the nitrogen-fixing lichens are<br />
similar to those previously reported (Pike<br />
1971). The nitrogen contents of the mosse s<br />
and nonnitrogen-fixing lichens are comparabl e<br />
to those reported by Rodin and Bazilevic h<br />
(1967) from tundra and conifer ecosystems ,<br />
but are much lower than those reported fro m<br />
the agricultural Willamette Valley (Pik e<br />
1971) .<br />
Using these values of nitrogen content, th e<br />
biomass estimates were converted to estimate s<br />
of the total quantity of nitrogen in th e<br />
epiphytes on this one tree (table 6). Thes e<br />
results indicate that 65 percent of the tota l<br />
epiphyte nitrogen is located in lichens an d<br />
that 55 percent of the total is found in a<br />
single species, Lobaria oregana . Since one-half<br />
of the Lobaria oregana occurs on branchlets,<br />
more than 25 percent of the epiphyte nitrogen<br />
is found there .<br />
Discussion<br />
Our estimate of 18.3 kg of epiphyte biomass<br />
on the one Douglas-fir tree sampled i s<br />
considerably higher than the average 0 .3 kg<br />
per tree found in a stand of Picea engelmannii<br />
and Abies lasiocarpa in British Columbi a<br />
(Edwards et al. 1960) and the 0 .4 to 1 .3 k g<br />
per tree found in stands of Pinus banksiana<br />
and Picea mariana in Saskatchewan (Scotter<br />
1962) . This high epiphyte biomass is relate d<br />
to the tremendous size of old-growth Douglasfir.<br />
When wet, the epiphyte load on this tree<br />
is probably three to four times the dry weight<br />
and may be a significant factor affectin g<br />
branch fall. (See Barkman (1958) for wate r<br />
capacity of lichens and bryophytes . )<br />
There are approximately 60 old-growt h<br />
Douglas-fir trees per hectare of forest in<br />
18 5
Table 5 .-Nitrogen contents of common epiphytes in water -<br />
shed 10. Analyses were performed on air-dry material;<br />
results are expressed on an ovendry-weight basis<br />
Epiphyte<br />
Percent nitroge n<br />
Lichens with green algal phycobionts :<br />
Alectoria sarmentosa 0 .49<br />
Hypogymnia enteromorpha .50<br />
Hypogymnia imshaugii .66<br />
Platismatia glauca .4 1<br />
Platismatia herrei .50<br />
Platismatia stenophylla .52<br />
Sphaerophorus globosus .4 2<br />
Lichens with Nostoc phycobionts:<br />
Lobaria oregana 1 .9 3<br />
Peltigera aphthose 2.84<br />
Pseudocyphellaria anomala 3.07<br />
Pseudocyphellaria anthraspis 2 .6 2<br />
Sticta weigelii 3 .78<br />
Bryophytes :<br />
Dicranum scoparium .87<br />
Hypnum circinale .95<br />
Isothecium spiculiferum 1 .1 0<br />
Table 6 .-Estimates of the total quantity of nitrogen containe d<br />
in the epiphytes on tree 1 in watershed 1 0<br />
Epiphyte<br />
Nitrogen<br />
g<br />
BRYOPHYTES<br />
Hypnum circinale 40<br />
Dicranum spp . 2 6<br />
Other bryophytes 1 7<br />
Bryophyte total 8 2<br />
LICHEN S<br />
Sphaerophorus globosus 8<br />
Other lichens with green algal phycobionts 4<br />
Lobaria oregana 12 7<br />
Other lichens with Nostoc phycobionts 4<br />
Lichen total 14 3<br />
TOTAL 225<br />
186
watershed 10 (C . T. Dyrness, personal communication).<br />
Our 18.3 kg of epiphytes, per<br />
tree would then correspond to 1 .1 metric tons<br />
per hectare, a figure well within the range of<br />
values reported from northern conifer forests<br />
(Edwards et al . 1960, Scotter 1962, Rodin<br />
and Bazilevich 1967). Our estimate is only for<br />
the overstory Douglas-fir trees, however, an d<br />
does not take into account the considerabl e<br />
biomass of epiphytes that is located on understory<br />
trees and shrubs .<br />
For comparison, our estimate of the tota l<br />
dry weight of needle biomass on the tree<br />
sampled is 84 kg, a figure 4 .6 times as high as<br />
the estimate of epiphyte biomass .<br />
Our finding, that a large proportion of<br />
epiphyte biomass is present on small branch -<br />
lets, indicates the importance of adequate<br />
sampling of this part of the tree and demonstrates<br />
the importance of nondestructiv e<br />
sampling because the branchlets are particularly<br />
likely to be destroyed when a large, old -<br />
growth Douglas-fir tree is felled . Since th e<br />
contribution from the branchlets is significant,<br />
EIV should be modified to include a<br />
component from the branchlets to avoi d<br />
underestimating the portion of epiphyte biomass<br />
located on small branch systems .<br />
Our methodology does not include estimates<br />
of biomass of crustose lichens or free -<br />
living algae. We have observed, even on twig s<br />
smaller than 1 cm in diameter, that cover of<br />
crustose lichens is regularly greater than 5 0<br />
percent of the total surface area of the twigs .<br />
Our estimates must be considered underestimates<br />
since they include only bryophytes an d<br />
foliose and fruticose lichens .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
We would like to acknowledge the assistance<br />
of Fred Rhoades, Jane McCauley, and<br />
Tom Denison in the field sampling and o f<br />
Mary Vreeland, Karen Barrett, and Kare n<br />
Berliner in sorting and weighing the epiphytes .<br />
This project began (June-August 1970) as a<br />
student project supported by the National<br />
Science Foundation Undergraduate Researc h<br />
Participation Program (Grant No. GY-7641 )<br />
to the Department of Botany, Oregon Stat e<br />
University . Subsequent work was supporte d<br />
by National Science Foundation Grant No .<br />
GB-20963 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome ,<br />
U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems, International<br />
Biological Program . This is Contribution No .<br />
34 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Barkman, J. J. 1958 . Phytosociology and<br />
ecology of cryptogamic epiphytes . 628 p . ,<br />
illus. Assen, Netherlands : Van Gorcum.<br />
Denison, William C., Diane M. Tracy ,<br />
Frederick M. Rhoades, and Martha Sherwood<br />
. 1972 . Direct, nondestructiv e<br />
measurement of biomass and structure i n<br />
living old-growth Douglas-fir . In Jerry F .<br />
Franklin, L. J. Dempster, and Richard H .<br />
Waring (eds.), Proceedings-research on<br />
coniferous forest ecosystems-a symposium,<br />
p. 147-158, illus. Pac. Northwest<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> & Range Exp . Stn., Portland, Oreg.<br />
Edwards, R. Y., J. Soos, and R . W. Ritcey .<br />
1960 . Quantitative observations o n<br />
epidendric lichens used as food by caribou .<br />
Ecology 41 : 425-431 .<br />
Pike, L . H. 1971. The role of epiphytic<br />
lichens and mosses in production and nutri -<br />
ent cycling of an oak forest. 172 p ., illus .<br />
Ph.D. thesis, on file at Univ. Oreg ., Eugene .<br />
Rodin, L. E., and N . I. Bazilevich . 1967 . Production<br />
and mineral cycling in terrestrial<br />
vegetation . [Trans. from Russian .] 288 p . ,<br />
illus. Edinburgh : Oliver and Boyd .<br />
Scotter, G . W. 1962. Productivity of arborea l<br />
lichens and their possible importance t o<br />
barren-ground caribou (Rangifer arcticus) .<br />
Arch . Soc . Bot. Fenn . " Vanamo" 16 :<br />
155-161 .<br />
187
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Litter, foliage, branch, and ste m<br />
production in contrasting lodgepole<br />
pine habitats of the Colorado Front Rang e<br />
William H . Moir '<br />
Colorado State University<br />
A bstrac t<br />
Harvest data are presented from a 70-year-old naturally thinned stand of lodgepole pine (Pins contorta<br />
Dougl.) in the subalpine P . contorta/Vaccinium myrtillus habitat and from five stands of similar-aged lodgepole<br />
pine in the drier P . contorta/Geranium fremontii habitat. These latter stands include both naturally thinned and<br />
artificially uniform-thinned treatments . Stand structure, natural mortality, biomass components, growt h<br />
increments of stem wood, branches, and foliage, and net primary production of these materials are given in<br />
tables. Litter production over a 4-year period is also reported for each stand ; sources of variation in litte r<br />
production are discussed.<br />
Introduction<br />
<strong>Forest</strong>s of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta<br />
Dougl.) are extensive in the central and northern<br />
Rocky Mountains and portions of the<br />
Cascade Range . Studies on net primary production<br />
are lacking, however, in virtually al l<br />
habitats in which this pine is the major re -<br />
source. Biomass studies in certain lodgepole<br />
pine habitats in Alberta have been publishe d<br />
(Kiil 1968, Johnstone 1971), and in Colorado,<br />
the biomass of forest floor humus and<br />
pine foliage has been reported (Moir and Grier<br />
1969, Moir and Francis 1972) . These studies<br />
were not extended to net primary productivity<br />
. Our rather extensive knowledge of net<br />
stem wood production in the central Rocky<br />
Mountains (Myers 1967) does not reveal th e<br />
relationship between productivity and th e<br />
lodgepole pine habitats or include branch an d<br />
foliage production. I report below, therefore ,<br />
results of a 4-year study in Colorado concerning<br />
aspects of net primary productivity i n<br />
mostly 70-year-old natural stands of lodgepole<br />
pine .<br />
Methods<br />
Six stands on the east slopes of the Front<br />
Range in Boulder County, Colorado, wer e<br />
studied . Stand LH2 occurs in the subalpine P .<br />
contorta/Vaccinium myrtillus habitat; the<br />
others occur in the drier, montane P .<br />
contorta/Geranium fremontii habitat. Habitat<br />
features and pine population statistics ar e<br />
given by Moir (1969), Moir and Francis<br />
(1972), and table 1 . In each stand a rectangular<br />
study plot was established in an area<br />
where the forest structure appeared homogeneous.<br />
Plot size varied with stem density<br />
(table 1). Annual litter fall was periodicall y<br />
measured from randomized 0 .25 m 2 micro -<br />
plots permanently located within each plo t<br />
(Moir and Grier 1969) . All surface organi c<br />
material in the microplots was collected a t<br />
4-month intervals in 1969, and in late August,<br />
the remaining years . Mineral contamination a t<br />
collection was minimized by computing litter<br />
'Present address: Box 31, Rodeo, New Mexico<br />
88056 .<br />
189
Table 1 .-Some population characteristics of Pinus con torta in stand s<br />
on the east slopes of the Colorado Front Range<br />
Stand<br />
and<br />
year<br />
Age'<br />
Plot<br />
area<br />
Number of stems by d.b.h. classes<br />
0 .2 .5 2 .5-5 5-7 .5 7 .5-10 10.15 15-20 20-2 5<br />
Density<br />
Mortalit y<br />
Years m 2 cm Stems/ha Stems/ha x yr<br />
2 .2 71 8 4<br />
1966 130 136 27 2 35,700<br />
1970 82 135 25 4 29,300 1,60 0<br />
4 .1 72 12 6<br />
1966 3 35 56 38 5 10,900<br />
1970 1 24 49 39 8 9,600 32 5<br />
1 .1 72 12 6<br />
1966 1 26 46 30 10 9,000<br />
1970 24 35 36 12 1 8,600 100<br />
1 .3 103 15 0<br />
1966 2 7 5 25 8 3,10 0<br />
1970 5 5 23 12 3,000 2 5<br />
4 .3 71 37 5<br />
1966 29 1 1 12 45 2 1,600 2<br />
1970 25 2 7 45 8 1,650 0<br />
LH2 77 15 0<br />
1966 2 4 10 18 19 4 3,80 0<br />
1970 2 4 9 18 20 4 3,800 0<br />
' Reference year 1970 . Stand age is based upon the oldest trees .<br />
2 This stand was thinned in 1934-35 . Density refers to stems over 2 .5 cm d .b .h .<br />
fall as loss-on-ignition (Moir and Grier 1969) ,<br />
and the tendency of debris of the forest floo r<br />
to "drift" into the microplots was offset b y<br />
slightly increasing the effective area of th e<br />
microplot during computation .<br />
In each of plots 1 .1, 4.3, and LH2 of table<br />
1, the stems of lodgepole pine were placed<br />
into five diameter (d .b.h.) classes, with an<br />
equal number of stems in each class. In September<br />
1969, the tree at the midpoint of eac h<br />
d .b .h. class was harvested (Ovington, Forrest ,<br />
and Armstrong 1967), giving five trees fro m<br />
each plot. Current and second year foliage<br />
and twigs were separated from each other an d<br />
from older material. Branches with any livin g<br />
foliage whatever were classified as living an d<br />
separated from dead branches at harvest time .<br />
From each stem replicate disks were obtained<br />
at the stem base, at 3 to 4 dm ., and just belo w<br />
the lowest living branch (crown base) . From<br />
each disk I measured diameter inside bark ,<br />
diameter outside bark (d .o .b.), wood density<br />
(volume determined by water immersion) ,<br />
bark density at 102° C., and average radial<br />
growth during each of growing seasons 196 8<br />
and 1969. In addition, measurements of<br />
19 0
d.o .b. were made at periodic lengths along th e<br />
felled stems. Since this harvest procedure i s<br />
not effective- for estimating cone productio n<br />
(Ovington, Forrest, and Armstrong 1967 ,<br />
Lotan and Jensen 1970), this is not include d<br />
in the study . Biomass values are reported at<br />
700 C. ovendry weights except for bole materials<br />
(stem wood and bark) which are reporte d<br />
at 102° C. ovendry weights .<br />
Stem biomass was calculated by the Smalian<br />
equation, multiplying each volume segment<br />
by the appropriate wood density observed<br />
from the disks . Stem biomass increments wer e<br />
computed as the difference between Smalian<br />
biomass for the years 1969 and 1968 . Similarly,<br />
bark biomass for each bole was deter -<br />
mined by the Smalian difference betwee n<br />
diameters inside and outside bark, using bark<br />
densities for each volume segment . The increment<br />
of living branches was calculated using<br />
estimative ratios (Whittaker and Woodwel l<br />
1968), assuming that relative branch increments<br />
are approximated by relative ste m<br />
wood increments . Branch mortality was computed<br />
by a canopy displacement model<br />
(Madgwick 1968). The computation assume s<br />
a canopy steady state in which the upward<br />
displacement of the envelope of green foliag e<br />
within a stand leaves a wake of dead branche s<br />
that were alive the previous year . The average<br />
displacement of foliage was further assume d<br />
to be the mean height growth of each stand .<br />
Stem mortality was computed from the mortalities<br />
of table 1, in which the biomass o f<br />
dead stems during the mortality period wa s<br />
determined from the basic allometric relation -<br />
ship between stem biomass and d .b.h .<br />
Calculations were based on the equation s<br />
below :<br />
Biomass and growth increments .<br />
H = total stem length (ft )<br />
T = stem length to crown<br />
(lowest living whorl )<br />
d i , d2 , d 3<br />
= diameter inside bark at ground<br />
level, 1 ft, and lowest living<br />
whorl respectively (inch) .<br />
P 1, P2, P3 = wood densities at ground level ,<br />
1 ft, and lowest living whorl<br />
(g/cc) .<br />
k = conversion constant t o<br />
metric = 0 .0772 2<br />
Ar' 1 , Ore, Ara = mean radial growth (inch) at<br />
ground, 1 ft, and crown base.<br />
Ws = biomass (kg) at 102° C<br />
II. Living branches.<br />
AWb = Wb ~ s<br />
Ws<br />
+ new twig biomass<br />
Branch mortality (per tree) = Wb(AH )<br />
T '<br />
where AH . is average height growth for<br />
stand, T' is stem length within the crown<br />
over which branch mortality is observed ,<br />
and Wb is the live branch biomass along<br />
stem portion T' , Wb is total live branc h<br />
biomass of the crown (along stem lengt h<br />
H-T) .<br />
III. Basic allometric equation .<br />
W = k 1 D k 2 , for biomass W and DBH of D ,<br />
and regression constants ,<br />
k 1 and k 2 .<br />
In the case of plot 4 .3 where a clear trend of<br />
stem wood increment with d .b.h . exists, the<br />
plot increment of stem wood was computed<br />
by linear regression over the independent<br />
variable, d .b.h .<br />
I. Stem .<br />
Ws = k[(di + di )P1 + (di + 43) (T - 1)p2<br />
+(d3 + .75 2 ) (H-T-3)ps ]<br />
AWs = W s - Ws- 1 , where Ws- 1 is obtaine d<br />
by substituting<br />
di - 2Ori for di (i = 1,2,3) .<br />
Litter Productio n<br />
Results<br />
Tables 2 and 3 give annual litter productio n<br />
in the six stands over the 4-year period . The<br />
mean annual litter production was 0 .4 6<br />
191
Table 2 .-Annual litter fall in Colorado stands of Pinus contorta .<br />
Values are given as loss on ignition weights .<br />
Year<br />
Stand<br />
2 .2 4 .1 1 .1 1.3 4 .3 LH2 Mean<br />
T otal<br />
Number<br />
of samples<br />
1967 0 .46 0 .47 17 1<br />
1968 0.37 0 .47 .36 0 .63 0 .30 0 .38 .40 5 2<br />
1969 .41 .56 .50 .88 .52 .69 .59 5 2<br />
1970 .25 .39 .37 .45 .30 .54 .37 52<br />
Mean .34 .47 .42 .65 .37 .52 .46<br />
1 A fire in our drying oven caused the loss of many samples . Only the samples from stand 1 .1 entirel y<br />
escaped the fire and can be used for comparison with other years.<br />
Table 3 .-Constituents of the 1967-68 annual litter fall, as los s<br />
on ignition in Pinus contorta stands in Colorado<br />
Stand<br />
Numbe r<br />
of samples<br />
Needles Branches 9 Cones d Cones Bark<br />
% kg/m 2 % kg/m 2 % kg/m 2 % kg/m 2 % kg/m 2<br />
2 .2 7 66 0 .24(18) 1 18 0.07(65) 12 0.05(59) 1 0 .00(58) 2 3 0 .01(20 )<br />
4 .1 7 64 .30(10) 13 .06(105) 18 .08(98) 1 .00(90) 5 .02(28 )<br />
1 .1 7 68 .24(11) 10 .04(29) 15 .05(52) 1 .00(45) 6 .02(36 )<br />
1 .3 8 54 .34(28) 6 .04(60) 34 .21(103) 2 .01(44) 5 .03(59 )<br />
4 .3 15 83 .25(17) 2 .01(105) 9 .03(72) 3 .01(35) 2 .01(70 )<br />
LH2 8 72 .26(14) 10 .04(55) 10 .04(94) 4 .02(21) 4 .01(56 )<br />
Mean 52 68 .27 10 .04 16 .07 2 .01 4 .0 2<br />
1<br />
Coefficient of variation in parentheses .<br />
2 Trace quantities are less than 0 .005 kg/m2 . Rounding errors may cause the percentages for each stand to<br />
total around 100 . Only trace quantities of nonpine debris are found in each stand .<br />
192
kg./m 2 . Both tables show, however, that<br />
numerous sources of variation in litter fal l<br />
occur in lodgepole pine forests. Variatio n<br />
within plots is evident (table 3) . Generally<br />
needle fall is less variable from microplot to<br />
microplot (CV from 10 to 18 percent except<br />
in low density stand 1 .3) than other components<br />
of the annual litter production .<br />
Branches and female cones exhibit very high<br />
spatial variability, and the latter is furthe r<br />
enhanced (beyond the values of table 3 )<br />
through activities of the common pine squirrel ,<br />
Tam ias c i u r u s h udsonicus . Generally th e<br />
percentages of needles, branches, etc . are<br />
rather uniform within and between stands ,<br />
but marked departures from mean percent -<br />
ages are found in the low density stands 1 . 3<br />
and 4.3 . These departures probably resul t<br />
from the lessened sloughing of branches a t<br />
lower portions of the bole . Thus, branches<br />
comprised only 2 percent of the annual litte r<br />
fall in stand 4 .3, but 18 percent in high<br />
density stand 2 .2. The very high cone accumulation<br />
in stand 1 .3 is partially explained by<br />
fire thinning around 1900 which remove d<br />
many smaller, noncone-bearing trees, and<br />
partly by the chance distribution of collectio n<br />
sites near prominent cone-bearing trees . The<br />
mean annual litter fall at the bottom of tabl e<br />
2 indicates that stands with 'least canopy mas s<br />
(2 .2 and 4 .3) have lowest litter fall, and thos e<br />
with greatest canopy mass (1 .3 and LH2) have<br />
the highest litter fall . This relationship is no t<br />
clear, however, when only a single year ' s<br />
annual litter fall is considered .<br />
In all stands, 1969 was the maximum litter<br />
fall year. Nevertheless, year-to-year differences<br />
are not consistent from stand to stand .<br />
Thus, 1970 was the year of least litter production<br />
in stand 2 .2 but not LH2 . Seasonal variations<br />
are also significant. The inclusive perio d<br />
from early June to late August gave 38 per -<br />
cent of the total annual litter production i n<br />
1969, but only about 26 percent of the total<br />
from the same stands the following year .<br />
While some materials such as branches may b e<br />
shed somewhat uniformly through the year ,<br />
others such as needles showed weak seasonal<br />
peaks from June through October . In only<br />
one year was there a conspicuous "peak sea -<br />
son" of needle fall in late August and September;<br />
in general, each stand was shedding<br />
needles continuously throughout the year .<br />
Biomass and Net Growth Increment s<br />
The live components of the abovegroun d<br />
pine crop are given in table 4. From the data<br />
the coefficients, k l and k 2 , of allometric<br />
equations of the form, W = k l D k 2 , were computed<br />
by regression (W is biomass in kg and D<br />
is d .b.h. in cm from columns of table 4) .<br />
These allometric equations and the entire<br />
population of d .b.h. values in each of plots<br />
4.3, 1 .1, and LH2 were used to compute th e<br />
stand biomass values of table 5 . This biomas s<br />
and the mean increments of table 4 were use d<br />
to compute the "new growth" values of tabl e<br />
6. The mean values of table 2 and the appropriate<br />
percentages of litter constituents i n<br />
table 3 were multiplied to give the litter fal l<br />
results of table 6. Stand LH2 in the P.<br />
contorta/V. myrtillus habitat is clearly th e<br />
most productive . In this stand the proportion<br />
of green needles to living shoot parts is very<br />
high in average to dominant tree sizes, as<br />
shown in the last column of table 4 . By contrast<br />
stand 1 .1 in the P. contorta/G. fremonti i<br />
habitat (Moir 1969) has in general a lowe r<br />
ratio of green needles to living shoot parts i n<br />
average to dominant trees . Current year<br />
fascicles comprise a greater end-of-season proportion<br />
of the green canopy (25 to 31 per -<br />
cent) in stand 1 .1 than in stand LH2 (17 to<br />
27 percent) . Most trees in the latter stand retain<br />
fascicles for several years longer than<br />
stand 1 .1 . Stand 4 .3 occurs in the same habitat<br />
as stand 1 .1 but was thinned in 1934-3 5<br />
to about 2 .5 x 2.5 m stem spacing . The consequence<br />
was to reduce light competition an d<br />
encourage lateral branch growth . Surviving<br />
stems retained a high proportion of needle s<br />
(11 to 17 percent of the shoot weight), an d<br />
abscission would not occur until about th e<br />
5th year. By 1969 this stand had age<br />
reached a "closed" canopy condition ; exces s<br />
needles were abscissing as suggested by th e<br />
high needle percentage of table 5 and by th e<br />
negative net needle production in table 6 .<br />
Further discussion of foliage characteristics of<br />
these stands is given by Moir and Franci s<br />
(1972) .<br />
193
Table 4. Biomass and growth increments from harvested Pinus contorta trees<br />
Stand and tree D .b .h .<br />
Total<br />
shoot<br />
Bole 2<br />
Stem wood Living branches Green needles<br />
Ws<br />
p /Ws Wb WWb Wn L\/Wn Wn/S 3<br />
cm • kg kg % kg % kg %+ %<br />
LH2 5 19 .3 145 111 .2 103 .1 2.2 12 .4 4 .9 12 .3 22 8 . 9<br />
4 16 .5 91 68 .0 63 .1 1 .4 7 .8 3 .3 5 .8 18 7 . 1<br />
3 12 .4 49 42 .0 38 .8 2.2 2 .7 4 .8 2 .7 17 5 . 7<br />
2 10 .0 27 23 .4 21.0 1.5 1 .1 3 .6 1 .0 27 3 .9<br />
1 7 .6 11 9 .2 8 .5 .7 .4 3 .9<br />
Mean 1 .8 4 .2 2 1<br />
1 .1 5 10 .0 23 17 .9 16.1 1 .9 1 .4 5 .5 1 .4 25 6 . 3<br />
4 7 .6 13 9 .6 8.6 1 .3 .8 4 .5 .8 30 6 .7<br />
3 7 .6 13 10 .8 9 .8 2.2 .7 5 .7 .8 28 6 .4<br />
2 5 .1 4 3 .5 3 .1 .8 .13 4 .6 .16 31 4 . 1<br />
1 3 .6 2 1 .8 1 .6 .05 .02 1 . 1<br />
Mean 1 .6 5 .1 2 8<br />
4 .3 5 14 .0 44 24 .2 22 .5 1 .7 6 .5 5 .1 4 .9 25 12 .6<br />
4 12 .7 30 19 .3 18 .1 1 .8 4 .2 4 .3 3 .0 24 10 .6<br />
3 11 .7 25 17 .4 15 .8 1 .9 3 .2 5 .3 2 .6 27 10 . 8<br />
2 10 .7 18 10 .7 9 .7 2 .2 2 .5 4 .8 2 .6 20 15 .5<br />
1 8 .9 15 9 .0 8.6 2 .3 2 .0 7 .5 2 .4 26 17 . 1<br />
Mean 5 .4 24<br />
Includes bole, living and dead branches, cones, and needles .<br />
2 Stem wood plus stem bark .<br />
3s refers to total shoot less dead branches .<br />
Table 6 suggests that organic production<br />
and turnover in the three stands is approximately<br />
steady (Kira and Shidei 1967) . The<br />
only meaningful net annual accumulation is<br />
the stem wood component (and the unmeasured<br />
root wood). Of course, my branch mortality<br />
model assumed a steady state condition<br />
for these stands, but the assumption is not<br />
disturbed in table 6 where new growth and<br />
branch mortality are balanced by the observed<br />
contribution of branches and needle s<br />
to the litter fall .<br />
The inherent photosynthetic capacity o f<br />
stand LH2 is high by virtue of the great lea f<br />
biomass and surface display of current-year<br />
foliage (Moir and Francis 1972) . The tw o<br />
stands of the drier habitat have considerably<br />
less foliage. Stand 4.3 has only half the increment<br />
of current-year foliage as stand 1 . 1<br />
(table 6). Since current-year foliage has<br />
greater photosynthetic capacity than older<br />
pine foliage (e .g., Larson and Gordon 1969) ,<br />
this difference may account for the reduce d<br />
amount of net stem wood production in stand<br />
194
Table 5 .Pinus contorta stand biomass, 1970, from harvest s<br />
on the east slopes of the Colorado Front Rang e<br />
Compartment<br />
Stan d<br />
4 .3 1 .1 LH 2<br />
kg/m 2 96 kg/m 2 kg/m 2 96<br />
Live pine crop :<br />
Bole' 3 .24 46 9 .44 57 21 .68 5 8<br />
Live branches .75 11 .83 5 2 .11 6<br />
Roots 1 .782 25 2 4 .28 26 9 .68 2 6<br />
Green needles .50 7 .84 5 1 .74 5<br />
Cones .35 5 .57 3 .24 1<br />
Dead branches .39 6 .57 4 1 .69 4<br />
Total 7 .01 100 16 .53 100 37 .14 10 0<br />
Standing dead timber 3 0 1 .06 .1 5<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> floor humus4 2 .85 3 .16 3 .8 6<br />
Ground flora s .01 0 .005<br />
Total 9 .87 20 .75 41 .18<br />
' Stem wood plus bark .<br />
2 Biomass of roots with diameters over about 5 mm were computed on the basis of nine excavated roo t<br />
systems . Percentages and totals in stands 1 .1 and LH2 assume root biomass to be about 25 percent of the liv e<br />
pine crop (Rodin and Bazilevich 1967) .<br />
3 Above ground parts only (bole plus branches) .<br />
4 After Moir and Grier 1969 .<br />
5 Shoot parts only, from harvests in August 1967 .<br />
4.3 despite both stands having identical leaf<br />
area indices of 4 .5 m 2 /m 2 (Moir and Francis<br />
1972) .<br />
Conclusions<br />
Pine stands in the Lodgepole Pine Zone of<br />
Colorado (Moir 1969) are not very productive<br />
per unit of current-year leaf biomass . It is instructive<br />
to compare the net primary productivity<br />
of stand LH2 (the most productive in<br />
this study) with pine stands having simila r<br />
steady state quantities of annual foliage production.<br />
Unfortunately, there are very few<br />
published studies of net primary productivit y<br />
for older natural stands of Pinus (Art and<br />
Marks 1971, Kira and Shidei 1967) . However ,<br />
several studies within young plantations o r<br />
natural stands do permit comparison, as give n<br />
in table 7 . It is clear that annual stem an d<br />
branch production in the P. contorta stand i s<br />
well below that of the three younger pine<br />
types. Numerous studies within developin g<br />
pine plantations have led workers to conclude<br />
that within a few years after canop y<br />
closure gross productivity levels off and i n<br />
following years net production declines a s<br />
stand respiration continues to increase. Forrest<br />
(1969) concluded that the weight of<br />
foliage in developing P. radiata plantation s<br />
(the oldest of his series of stands is given in<br />
table 7) is probably constant after about 1 2<br />
years. However, I am not convinced on th e<br />
19 5
Table 6.-Annual turnover from certain shoot component s<br />
of Pinus contorta stands in Colorado '<br />
Component<br />
Stand<br />
4 .3 I 1 .1 LH 2<br />
------------------ kg/m2<br />
Bol e<br />
New growth 0 .06 0 .15 0.3 9<br />
Stem mortality 0 - .02 0<br />
Net .06 .13 .3 9<br />
Branches<br />
New growth .04 .04 .0 8<br />
Branch mortality -.03 - .01 - .0 3<br />
Litter fall - .01 - .04 - .0 5<br />
Net 0 - .01 0<br />
Needles<br />
New growth .12 .24 .3 7<br />
Litter fall - .32 - .29 - .3 8<br />
Net - .20 - .05 - .01<br />
' Litter fall is determined by the equation :<br />
Li = fiL, where L is the 3- or 4-year mean (table 2) and fi is the fractional<br />
component of needles or branches from table 3 .<br />
Table 7.-Some comparisons of annual increments in shoo t<br />
components of contrasting pine stand s<br />
Stand Age Density<br />
Annual production<br />
Foliage Stem Branches<br />
References<br />
yr sterns/ha metric tons/ha<br />
P. contorta 77 3,800 3 .7 3.9 0 .8 This study<br />
P. radiata 12 1,560 3 .1-3 .3 10 .8 2 .9 Forrest 196 9<br />
P. virginiana 17 5,750 4 .3 5 .8 3 .6 Madgwick 196 8<br />
P. densiflora 33 2,340 3 .4 8.7 2 .1 Hatiya et al . 196 5<br />
196
asis of the structure of the different pin e<br />
crops (tables 1 and 5 and comparable descriptions<br />
from references in table 7) that the<br />
three lodgepole pine stands of this study carry<br />
appreciably greater burdens of respiratory<br />
biomass (Yoda et al. 1965). The major limitation<br />
of pine productivity in the Central and<br />
Northern Rocky Mountains may be the generally<br />
infertile soils and inimical continental<br />
climates. Under these environmental conditions<br />
not even the thinning treatment (stand<br />
4.3) and subsequent surge of productivity i n<br />
surviving stems gave increased yield on an are a<br />
basis (table 6) .<br />
Management decisions in the Colorad o<br />
Lodgepole Pine Zone must recognize th e<br />
inherent low productivity of P. contorta .<br />
Where wood production must continue t o<br />
have management priority, efficiency o f<br />
utilization can be increased at least 10 percent<br />
if live branches can be economically include d<br />
in the harvest (table 5) (Young 1968) . Management<br />
can also be directed toward uneven -<br />
aged stands for purposes of esthetics, enhanced<br />
groundcover production, or better<br />
game utilization. Small, irregularly shaped<br />
clearcut areas are also an attractive management<br />
possibility for long-term planning in this<br />
low productivity region . This study suggests<br />
strongly that because of its very low productivity,<br />
especially when compared against th e<br />
productivity of intensively managed pin e<br />
plantations, lodgepole pine stands in environments<br />
of site index of 90 or less should b e<br />
regarded as only minor resources of woo d<br />
harvest. A greater percentage of such land i n<br />
the lodgepole pine region of North Americ a<br />
might be devoted to recreational usage .<br />
A much neglected management tool in<br />
lodgepole pine forests is prescribed burning .<br />
Periodic fires were an important feature of<br />
lodgepole forests (Moir 1969) . This study and<br />
others (Kiil 1968) reveal that high quantities<br />
of slowly decomposable materials build up<br />
within natural stands . Fairly high quantities<br />
of nutrients become locked up in the forest<br />
floor humus (Moir and Grier 1969) ; this<br />
humus together with the shaded condition of<br />
the forest floor in closed stands has adverse<br />
effect upon the ground flora (Basile and<br />
Jensen 1971, Moir 1966). Controlled fire has<br />
at least four possible beneficial effects in<br />
lodgepole pine forests : (1) The reduction of<br />
fuel and wildfire probability, (2) stimulatio n<br />
of ground vegetation, (3) a nutrient "pulse"<br />
effect stimulating tree production, (4) tree<br />
thinning and conversion to uneven-age d<br />
stands. The possible use of controlled surfac e<br />
fires in P. contorta should be given<br />
considerably more attention .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
Work reported in this paper was supporte d<br />
by the National Science Foundation, Grant No .<br />
B020357 in cooperation with the Coniferou s<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Biome, U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems ,<br />
International Biological Program . This is Contribution<br />
No. 35 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong><br />
Biome .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Art, H. W., and P. L. Marks. 1971. A summary<br />
table of biomass and net annual primary<br />
production in forest ecosystems o f<br />
the world . In <strong>Forest</strong> biomass studies, 15th<br />
IUFRO Congr., p. 3-32 . Orono : Univ.<br />
Maine Press .<br />
Basile, J. V., and C. E. Jensen . 1971 . Grazing<br />
potential on lodgepole pine clearcuts i n<br />
Montana. USDA <strong>Forest</strong> Serv . Res. Pap.<br />
INT-98, 11 p . Intermountain <strong>Forest</strong> &<br />
Range Exp . Stn ., Ogden, Utah .<br />
Forrest, W. G. 1969. Variations in the accumulation,<br />
distribution and movement of<br />
mineral materials in radiata pine plantations.<br />
276 p. Ph .D. thesis on file at<br />
Australian Nat . Univ., Canberra .<br />
Hatiya, K., K. Doi, and R. Kobayashi. 1965 .<br />
Analysis of the growth in Japanese red pin e<br />
(Pinus densiflora) stands. A report on th e<br />
matured plantation in Iwate Prefecture .<br />
Govt. For. Exp. Stn. Bull. (Tokyo) 176 :<br />
75-88 .<br />
Johnstone, W . D. 1971 . Total standing cro p<br />
and tree component distributions in thre e<br />
stands of 100-year-old lodgepole pine . In<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> biomass studies, 15th IUFR O<br />
Congr., p. 81-89 . Orono : Univ. Maine Press .<br />
197
Kiil, A. D. 1968. Weight of the fuel complex<br />
in 70-year-old lodgepole pine stands of different<br />
densities . Can. Dep. For. & Rural<br />
Dev., For. Br. Dep . Publ . 1228, 9 p .<br />
Kira, T., and T. Shidei . 1967 . Primary production<br />
and turnover of organic matter in different<br />
forest ecosystems of the wester n<br />
Pacific . Jap . J. Ecol . 17: 70-87 .<br />
Larson, P. R., and J . C. Gordon . 1969 . Photo -<br />
synthesis and wood yield . Agric. Sci. Rev .<br />
7 : 7-14 .<br />
Lotan, J . E., and C. E. Jensen . 1970. Estimating<br />
seed stored in serotinous cones of<br />
lodgepole pine. USDA <strong>Forest</strong> Serv . Res .<br />
Pap. INT-83, 10 p . Intermountain <strong>Forest</strong> &<br />
Range Exp . Stn ., Ogden, Utah .<br />
Madgwick, H. A. I. 1968. Seasonal changes in<br />
biomass and annual production of an old -<br />
field Pinus virginiana stand. Ecology 49 :<br />
149-152 .<br />
Moir, W . H . 1966. Influence of ponderosa<br />
pine on herbaceous vegetation . Ecology 47 :<br />
1045-1048 .<br />
. 1969. The lodgepole pine zon e<br />
in Colorado. Am. Midland Nat. 81 : 87-98 .<br />
and R . Francis . 1972. Foliage<br />
biomass and surface area in three Pinus<br />
contorta plots in Colorado . <strong>Forest</strong> Sci. 18 :<br />
41-45, illus .<br />
and H. Grier . 1969. Weight an d<br />
nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and cal -<br />
cium content of forest floor humus o f<br />
lodgepole pine stands in Colorado . Soil .<br />
Sci. Soc. Am. Proc . 33 : 137-140 .<br />
Myers, C. A. 1967. Yield tables for manage d<br />
stands of lodgepole pine in Colorado an d<br />
Wyoming. USDA <strong>Forest</strong> Serv . Res. Pap .<br />
RM-26, 20 p . Rocky Mountain <strong>Forest</strong> &<br />
Range Exp . Stn ., Fort Collins, Colo .<br />
Ovington, J. D., W . G . Forrest, and J . S. Armstrong.<br />
1967 . Tree biomass estimation . In<br />
Primary productivity and mineral cycling i n<br />
natural ecosystems-symp . Am. Assoc .<br />
Advan. Sci. 13th Annu . Meet . & Ecol . Soc .<br />
Am. (New York) Proc., p. 4-31 . Orono :<br />
Univ . Maine Press .<br />
Rodin, L . E., and N . I. Bazilevich . 1967 . [Production<br />
and mineral cycling in terrestrial<br />
vegetation.] 288 p. London : Oliver &<br />
Boyd . (English translation .)<br />
Whittaker, R . H ., and G. M. Woodwell . 1968 .<br />
Dimension and production relations of<br />
trees and shrubs in the Brookhaven <strong>Forest</strong> ,<br />
New York. J . Ecol . 56: 1-25 .<br />
Y o d a, K., K. Shinozaki, H. Ogawa, K .<br />
Hozumi, and T . Kira . 1965. Estimation of<br />
the total amount of respiration in wood y<br />
organs of trees and forest communities . J .<br />
Biol . (Osaka) 16 : 15-26 .<br />
Young, H. E. 1968 . Challenge of complete<br />
tree utilization . <strong>Forest</strong> Prod. J. 18 : 83-86 .<br />
198
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Small mammal and bird populations<br />
on Thompson site, Cedar River :<br />
parameters for modeling<br />
Sterling Miller, Curtis W . Erickson,<br />
Richard D . Taber, and Carl H . Nellis<br />
College of <strong>Forest</strong> Resource s<br />
University of Washingto n<br />
Seattle, Washingto n<br />
Abstract<br />
Preliminary estimates of small mammal and bird populations on the Thompson site in the Cedar Rive r<br />
watershed were made from 1969 to 1971 . Mammal populations were estimated through a kill-trap grid, and bird<br />
populations through systematic direct observations . The small mammal fauna, notably rich in insectivorou s<br />
forms, has as its most abundant members Trowbridge shrew (Sorex trowbridgei), vagrant shrew (Sorex vagrans) ,<br />
shrew-mole (Neurotrichus gibbsi), Oregon vole (Microtus oregoni), and deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) .<br />
Bird populations differed between summer and winter. In the summer the most abundant species wer e<br />
Swainson's thrush (Hylocichla ustulata), winter wren (Troglodytes troglodytes), Oregon junco (Junco oreganus) ,<br />
black-throated gray warbler (Dendroica nigrescens), chestnut-backed chickadee (Parus rufescens), brown-heade d<br />
cowbird (Molothrus ater), and MacGillivray's warbler (Oporornis tolmiei) . In winter only two birds were<br />
common: winter wren and golden-crowned kinglet (Regulus satrapa). For these species estimates were obtaine d<br />
for abundance, biomass and, for the mammals, energy flow .<br />
Introduction<br />
This paper represents a first step in providin g<br />
the information on terrestrial vertebrate s<br />
which will be needed in the development o f<br />
ecosystem models for the Western Coniferou s<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Biome . It covers the initial investigations<br />
on small mammal and bird populations ,<br />
which have centered on the Thompson site of<br />
the Cedar River watershed, King County, Wash -<br />
ington . Consideration is given to methodology ,<br />
results in terms of species populations, ecological<br />
role, biomass and energy, and the desirable<br />
directions for further investigations .<br />
The Thompson site consists of a second -<br />
growth Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii)<br />
forest about 60-70 years old, on Barnesto n<br />
soils formed from glacial outwashes . Elevations<br />
vary from 210-310 meters . There are<br />
small variations in ecological conditions with -<br />
in the forest, as indicated by differences i n<br />
the understory vegetation .<br />
Every biotic community is composed o f<br />
individual species, and these must be identified<br />
and studied individually in building u p<br />
knowledge concerning the whole . Schwarz<br />
(1967, p. 225-226) outlines our task and it s<br />
difficulties as follows :<br />
In order to determine the role of the species<br />
in the energy metabolism of the ecosystem,<br />
we must, first of all, determin e<br />
with the necessary reliability the following<br />
parameters of the population : th e<br />
absolute numbers of animals ; their biomass;<br />
the structure of the populatio n<br />
(because the intensity of the matter an d<br />
energy metabolism of animals of different<br />
weight, sex, age, physiologica l<br />
199
condition differ) ; the turnover rate o f<br />
the population, and the intensity o f<br />
metabolism of different groups of animals<br />
. . . Whilst it is not difficult to estimate<br />
the intensity of metabolism of certain<br />
species in a calorimetric chamber, i t<br />
is practically impossible to estimate the<br />
loss of energy by a bat, a mole, or a<br />
dolphin in the process of their natura l<br />
life activity .<br />
In the light of these considerations we wil l<br />
examine our preliminary data and, through a<br />
comparison of actual and needful information,<br />
delineate the work still to be done .<br />
Small Mammal Studies<br />
Since small mammals are generally inconspicuous,<br />
and do not make readily detectable<br />
signs, the determination of species presence<br />
and especially population density is widely<br />
recognized as a difficult problem .<br />
The most commonly used method fo r<br />
estimating population densities in smal l<br />
mammals is to capture, mark, and release a<br />
sample, and then capture a second sampl e<br />
containing both marked and unmarked individuals<br />
. Several underlying assumption s<br />
(Leslie 1952) are : all individuals have equa l<br />
probabilities of capture, released individual s<br />
disperse randomly into the populations, an d<br />
there is no mortality, natality, or significan t<br />
ingress or egress during the experimenta l<br />
period .<br />
Since these assumptions were not war -<br />
ranted in our case, and since we needed to<br />
collect specimens for data on weight, foo d<br />
habits, and reproduction, we considered intensive<br />
removal methods . Grodzinski et al .<br />
(1966) proposed such a method for IBP smal l<br />
mammal studies. They suggested intensive<br />
kill-trapping following a prebaiting period on<br />
a defined grid of locations . This provided data<br />
for an estimation procedure in which a regression<br />
line, plotted for the number of animals<br />
caught each day (on the ordinate axis) against<br />
the cumulative number previously caught ,<br />
would provide an estimate of populatio n<br />
density (the point where the regression line<br />
intersected the abscissa) . Earlier work on this<br />
approach was that of DeLury (1947), Hayn e<br />
(1949), and Zippin (1958) .<br />
The major flaw in the method of Grodzinski<br />
et al. (1966) is that it gives no accurat e<br />
estimate of the area sampled by the grid, be -<br />
cause the small mammals move some unknown<br />
distance to the trapping point . Sinc e<br />
the area sampled is not defined, populatio n<br />
densities cannot be determined .<br />
Adamczyk and Ryszkowski (1968) suggested<br />
that the sample grid be surrounded o n<br />
each side by an external belt of trapping locations<br />
to catch animals moving toward th e<br />
inner grid before they could reach it, thereb y<br />
controlling the "periphery effect ."<br />
The data provided by the external trappin g<br />
belt cannot be used, because the distance<br />
travelled by each animal before being caught<br />
is highly variable (Miller 1970) .<br />
Adamczyk and Ryszkowski (1968) recommend<br />
a 5-day prebaiting period to accusto m<br />
the mammals to the trap locations, followe d<br />
by a 5-day period of removal trapping . Their<br />
basic assumptions are : (1) all residents of the<br />
inner grid are captured, (2) prebaiting does<br />
not increase the resident density, and (3) individuals<br />
not resident on the inner grid are no t<br />
captured on the inner grid ; immigrants and<br />
individuals resident in the outer grid will b e<br />
captured, if at all, in the outer grid .<br />
Of these three assumptions, we could tes t<br />
only the second . Adopting a 5-day prebaiting<br />
period, we ran pairs of trap-lines-one pre -<br />
baited and one control-in each case . Total<br />
catches over 5 days were not different,<br />
though prebaited lines took a higher proportion<br />
of the catch on the first day (Mille r<br />
1970) . This finding corroborates that o f<br />
Babinska and Bock (1969), who showed tha t<br />
prebaiting did not significantly increase th e<br />
density of resident small mammals .<br />
Our trapping procedure was as follows : a<br />
5 .94-ha (12 .4-acre) sample area was divide d<br />
into 256 stations, 16 rows by 16 lines, wit h<br />
15 .2-meter spacing . Anchored at each statio n<br />
was a paper plate which was baited with oatmeal,<br />
millet, sunflower seeds, oats, and wheat<br />
for 5 days . Then the remaining bait was removed<br />
and two mouse traps were placed on<br />
each plate, one trap baited with a peanut<br />
butter-bacon grease mixture, and the other<br />
200
with a birdseed-Crisco mixture . Traps were<br />
run for 5 full days .<br />
Two such grids were established to sampl e<br />
the range of variability within the Thompso n<br />
site, and each was trapped twice, once in summer<br />
and once in winter, as follows : Grid I :<br />
July 22 to 27, 1969, and March 22 to 27 ,<br />
1970 ; Grid II : September 6 to 11, 1969, and<br />
February 18 to 23, 1970 . The results (table 1 )<br />
show several patterns . There is a difference<br />
between summer and winter populations i n<br />
almost all cases as well as a number of differences<br />
between plots . From other work on<br />
small mammal populations we would predict<br />
that there would also be variations from year<br />
to year .<br />
Since this method assumes that all th e<br />
mammals on the inner grid are caught, it i s<br />
important that trapping be highly efficient .<br />
Study of the trapping data (Miller 1970) suggests<br />
that winter populations may not be as<br />
trappable as summer populations, so winte r<br />
estimates in table 1 may be low . We have<br />
planned further work to increase trapping<br />
efficiency and so improve the accuracy of<br />
these estimates .<br />
Meanwhile, it is possible with our presen t<br />
data to obtain at least preliminary values for<br />
small mammal biomass (table 2) . Note that<br />
the differences between the two plots in tota l<br />
biomass are rather small, and that the dro p<br />
from summer to winter, in total biomass, is<br />
Table 1 .-Small mammal density estimates from grid-trapping (number per hectare )<br />
Species<br />
Grid I Gri I I<br />
July March September February<br />
Sorex trowbridgei 16 .8 3.0 8.2 3 .0<br />
S. vagrans 4 .3 2.6 1 .3 . 4<br />
Neurotrichus gibbsi 3 .5 .9 3.6 1 . 3<br />
Microtus oregoni 1 .3 .9 1 .7 1 . 7<br />
Peromyscus maniculatus 1 .7 1.3 2.2 1 . 3<br />
Total 27.6 8.7 17 .0 7 .7<br />
Table 2.-Small mammal biomass (grams per hectare)<br />
Species<br />
Grid I<br />
Gri d If<br />
July March September February<br />
Sorex trowbridgei 82 .3 18.5 41 .0 16 . 5<br />
S. vagrans 27 .4 17 .8 6.7 2 . 7<br />
Neurotrichus gibbsi 27 .9 7.7 51 .4 11 . 1<br />
Microtus oregoni 19 .8 14 .1 28.6 27 . 9<br />
Peromyscus maniculatus 27.7 22.0 36.6 22 . 2<br />
Total 185 .1 80 .1 164 .3 80.4<br />
20 1
proportionally about the same for each plot .<br />
Future studies will tell us what fractions of<br />
this biomass are attributable to variou s<br />
nutrient substances ; that is, what the chemical<br />
constitution of these small mammal bodies is .<br />
We can already make preliminary estimate s<br />
of energy flow through these small mamma l<br />
populations. The initial energy source for ecosystems<br />
is sunlight. It is fixed by green plants<br />
and may be passed to populations of plant -<br />
eating animals. Within animal population s<br />
energy is used in respiration and tissue production<br />
and may also be passed on to othe r<br />
(predatory) animal populations . Much less<br />
energy is expended in tissue production tha n<br />
respiration .<br />
We can combine published data on the<br />
caloric value of animal tissue and on smal l<br />
mammal metabolic rates with our estimates o f<br />
biomass and information on populatio n<br />
dynamics to estimate the energy consumed i n<br />
tissue production and respiration for ou r<br />
small mammal populations .<br />
The energy incorporated in tissue production,<br />
for small mammals, has been estimate d<br />
to average 1 .5 kcal/gm (Gorecki 1965) . Th e<br />
energy expended by the animal in its dail y<br />
activity-the metabolic rate-varies by species .<br />
The values used in our calculations are given<br />
in table 3 .<br />
We do not as yet have a detailed knowledg e<br />
of the dynamics of these small mammal populations.<br />
However, we now know enough t o<br />
establish upper and lower limits of energ y<br />
Table 3 .-Metabolic rates used in calculating the energy<br />
expended in respiration by small mammal s<br />
Species Cal/gm/day Authority<br />
Sorex trowbridgei 806 Pearson (1948 )<br />
S. vagrans 920 Pearson (1948), Gebczyski (1965 )<br />
Neurotrichus gibbsi 800 Authors' estimate<br />
Microtus oregoni 500 Estimate based on value fo r<br />
red-backed vole (Pearson 1947)<br />
Peromyscus maniculatus 440 McNab (1963)<br />
Table 4.-Estimated energy flow (respiration + tissue production )<br />
through small mammal population s<br />
(kcal per hectare per year )<br />
Species Minimum Maximu m<br />
Sorex trowbridgei 5,250 15,75 0<br />
S_ vagrans 3,470 7,42 0<br />
Neurotrichus gibbsi 2,760 6,81 0<br />
Microtus oregoni 4,300 6,43 0<br />
Peromyscus maniculatus 4,450 6,86 0<br />
Total 20,230 43,27 0<br />
202
flow for these species by using data on reproduction,<br />
seasonal population density and<br />
growth of young (Miller 1970) . These estimates<br />
are given in table 4 . If necessary, we<br />
can strive for more accuracy in future estimates<br />
through a more detailed knowledge -o f<br />
the dynamics of these populations .<br />
The role and foraging stratum of mammal s<br />
in the forest ecosystem can be roughly categorized<br />
as shown in table 5. Secondary consumers<br />
are relatively numerous in the small<br />
mammal populations pointing to the abundance<br />
of their invertebrate foods in the litter<br />
and soil of the forest .<br />
In categorizing such roles, we must recognize<br />
that the primary consumers do on occasion<br />
eat other animals, and that the secondar y<br />
consumers do eat plants . It remains for us t o<br />
delineate in more detail the nature of th e<br />
seasonal diet for each species, as well as the<br />
rates of consumption, and the amounts an d<br />
composition of the excretory products .<br />
Table 5 .-Names, foraging strata, and consumer roles of mammals o f<br />
the Thompson site, Cedar River watershed, Washington<br />
Scientific name<br />
Common name<br />
Foraging<br />
stratum<br />
Consumer<br />
role'<br />
Canis latrans Coyote G II °<br />
Cervus canadensis Elk (wapiti) G,S I °<br />
Chiroptera Bats C II°<br />
Eutamias townsendi Townsend's chipmunk G,S I°<br />
Lepus americanus Snowshoe hare G,S I°<br />
Lynx rufus Bobcat G II°<br />
Microtus oregoni Oregon vole G I°<br />
Mustela erminea Shorttail weasel G II °<br />
Mustela frenata Longtail weasel G II °<br />
Neotoma cinerea Bushytail woodrat G,S I °<br />
Neurotrichus gibbsi Shrew-mole B,L II °<br />
Odocoileus hemionus Black-tailed deer G,S I °<br />
Peromyscus maniculatus Deer mouse L,G I °<br />
Sorex trowbridgei Trowbridge shrew L II°<br />
Sorex vagrans Vagrant shrew L II°<br />
Tamiasciurus douglasi Chickaree G,S,C I°<br />
Ursus americanus Black bear L,G,S I°<br />
Zapus trinotatus Jumping mouse G I°<br />
1 B = soil layer ; L = litter layer ; G = ground layer, under 1 foot ; S = shrub layer, 1 to 6 feet ; C = crown layer ,<br />
area occupied by living crowns of forest overstory .<br />
21° = primary consumer, eats mostly plant material ; II° = secondary consumer, eats mostly animal matter .<br />
20 3
Bird Studies<br />
The forest birds were sampled both summer<br />
and winter on a 6 .0-ha plot chosen t o<br />
represent the Thompson site . This plot was<br />
divided into fifteen 0 .4-ha sample units on a<br />
map of the whole plot . A series of transect s<br />
was made through the whole plot on each<br />
sample day by Erickson who noted each bird<br />
observation by location and species . Durin g<br />
the summer sample period (May and June) ,<br />
many breeding males were singing, whic h<br />
facilitated their detection . During the winter<br />
observation period (December), there had t o<br />
be more dependence on sight than sound .<br />
Five days of observation were spent at eac h<br />
season, and all observations took place during<br />
mornings when there was no heavy rain. Th e<br />
results for the two seasons are given in table<br />
6 .<br />
Some less common, but in some case s<br />
rather large birds, are also found on th e<br />
Thompson site . During the coming year we<br />
will be able to make population estimates of<br />
these species, adding substantially to our total<br />
estimate of bird biomass .<br />
The contrast between summer and winte r<br />
populations is much sharper for birds than fo r<br />
small mammals . This has implications for ecosystem<br />
modeling, since some birds reproduc e<br />
on the Thompson site but winter elsewhere ,<br />
presumably suffering some mortality, an d<br />
thus constituting a one-way movement o f<br />
energy and nutrients out of the Thompso n<br />
site . From a knowledge of body weights w e<br />
have calculated the biomass of common bird s<br />
on the Thompson site by season (table 6) .<br />
Energy-flow estimates for these bird populations<br />
cannot yet be made because neithe r<br />
population estimates of the larger birds no r<br />
annual cycles of abundance of each bird species<br />
are yet available for the Thompson site .<br />
This must be one of our next topics of study .<br />
The role and foraging stratum of birds is<br />
roughly categorized in table 7. As in the case<br />
of small mammals, some of these birds shif t<br />
seasonally in their consumer-roles . A diet of<br />
invertebrates is essential for the young of al l<br />
species. Also, shifts in the relative abundanc e<br />
of available food will presumably be reflecte d<br />
in food habits . These are also topics on which<br />
more work must be done .<br />
Table 6.-Abundance (number per 100 hectares) and biomass (grams per hectare)<br />
of the most common birds by species and seaso n<br />
Species<br />
Abundance<br />
Biom as s<br />
Summer Winter Summer Winter<br />
Molothrus ater 26 0 11 .4 0<br />
Junco oreganus 43 0 9.9 0<br />
Troglodytes troglodytes 36 33 3.5 3 . 1<br />
Hylocichla ustulata 16 0 5.8 0<br />
Dendroica nigrescens 43 0 4.5 0<br />
Parus rufescens 23 0 2.3 0<br />
Regulus satrapa 0 33 0 2 . 0<br />
Oporornis tolmiei 26 0 1 .6 0<br />
Total 213 66 39.0 5 .1<br />
204
Table 7.-Names, foraging strata, and consumer roles of birds of th e<br />
Thompson site, Cedar River watershed, Washingto n<br />
Scientific name<br />
Common name<br />
Foraging Consumer<br />
stratum' role 2<br />
Bombycilla cedrorum Cedar waxwing C I°<br />
Bonasa umbellus Ruffed grouse L,G,S,C I°<br />
Bubo virginianus Great homed owl G II°<br />
Colaptes cater Red-shafted flicker G,C II°<br />
Columba fasciata Band-tailed pigeon L,S,C I°<br />
Corvus brachyrhynchos Common crow G II°<br />
Corvus corax Common raven G II °<br />
Dendragopus obscurus Blue grouse L,G,S,C I°<br />
Dendrocopos villosus Hairy woodpecker S,C II°<br />
Dendroica nigrescens Black-throated gray warbler S,C II°<br />
Empidonax spp . Empidonax flycatchers S,C II°<br />
Hylocichla ustulata Swainson's thrush L,G II°<br />
Ixereus naevius Varied thrush L,G II°<br />
Junco oreganus Oregon junco L,G I °<br />
Loxia curvirostra Red crossbill C I°<br />
Molothrus ater Brown-headed cowbird G I°<br />
Oporornis tolmiei MacGillivray's warbler S,C II°<br />
Parus rufescens Chestnut-backed chickadee S,C II°<br />
Passerella iliaca Fox sparrow G I°<br />
Perisoreus canadensis Gray jay G,C II °<br />
Pipilo erythrophthalmus Rufous-sided towhee G I °<br />
Piranga ludoviciana Western tanager S,C I °<br />
Regulus calendula Ruby-crowned kinglet C II °<br />
Regulus satrapa Golden-crowned kinglet C II °<br />
Selasphorus rufus Rufous hummingbird G,S I °<br />
Sitta canadensis Red-breasted nuthatch S,C II °<br />
Sphyrapicus varius Yellow-bellied sapsucker S,C I °<br />
Spinus pinus Pine siskin C I °<br />
Troglodytes troglodytes Winter wren G,S II °<br />
Turdus migratorius Robin L,G II °<br />
Vermivora celata Orange-crowned warbler S,C II °<br />
Vireo gilvus Warbling vireo S,C II°<br />
B = soil layer ; L = litter layer ; G = ground layer, under 1 foot ; S = shrub layer, 1 to 6 feet ; C = crown layer ,<br />
area occupied by living crowns of forest overstory .<br />
2 1° = primary consumer, eats mostly plant material ; II° = secondary consumer, eats mostly animal matter .<br />
20 5
Further Studies<br />
The data provided for small mammal populations<br />
will be more useful if we are able t o<br />
make more accurate population density estimates<br />
and if we determine the yearly, seasonal,<br />
and geographical fluctuations in<br />
density. Further, a more detailed understanding<br />
of population dynamics will permit a<br />
more accurate estimate of energy flow, and<br />
set the stage for studies of uptake, storage ,<br />
and loss of chemical materials by smal l<br />
mammal populations .<br />
Of course, the same sort of informatio n<br />
must be obtained for the large mammals ,<br />
which include several important primary consumers.<br />
For large mammals the role of movement<br />
must be studied, since seasonal movements<br />
entail a translocation of materials, an d<br />
patterns of mortality provide loci of nutrien t<br />
release .<br />
For birds the study of movements will also<br />
be important, since long-distance annua l<br />
migrations provide a potential mechanism for<br />
the annual loss of materials from the ecosystem<br />
.<br />
A prime consideration in all such studie s<br />
will be the establishment of confidence limits<br />
for the data, and estimates of additiona l<br />
sampling necessary for results of a stipulate d<br />
level of accuracy . Then we will be in a position<br />
to respond to the needs of modeling in a<br />
realistic way with regard to the actual field o r<br />
laboratory work which provision of any particular<br />
piece of information will require .<br />
In addition to these inventories of vertebrate<br />
animals in the forest ecosystem, we will<br />
seek an understanding of the effects that<br />
animal populations may have on the populations<br />
of plants which constitute their food ,<br />
i.e ., the control function exerted by animal s<br />
over plant populations. A knowledge of suc h<br />
relations, properly quantified, will help pro -<br />
vide the basis for models of the dynamics o f<br />
plant populations .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
This study was supported by the Department<br />
of Game, State of Washington ; Institute<br />
of <strong>Forest</strong> Products, University of Washington ;<br />
Ecology Training Grant from the Nationa l<br />
Science Foundation to the Zoology Department,<br />
University of Washington ; and by<br />
National Science Foundation Grant No .<br />
GB-20963 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome ,<br />
U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems, Internationa l<br />
Biological Program . This is Contribution No .<br />
36 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome, IBP . We<br />
also wish to thank the personnel of the Cedar<br />
River watershed and the Seattle Water Department<br />
for their assistance and cooperatio n<br />
throughout the study .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Adamczyk, K ., and L . Ryszkowski. 1968 .<br />
Estimation of the density of a rodent popu -<br />
lation using stained bait. Acta Ther .<br />
13(17) : 295-311 .<br />
Babinska, J ., and E . Bock. 1969 . The effect of<br />
prebaiting on capture of rodents . Act a<br />
Ther. 14(19) : 267-270 .<br />
De Lury, D . B . 1947 . On the estimation o f<br />
biological populations. Biometrics 3 :<br />
145-167 .<br />
Gebczynski, M . 1965 . Seasonal and age<br />
changes in the metabolism and activity o f<br />
Sorex araneus L . Acta Ther. 10(22) :<br />
303-331 .<br />
Gorecki, A. 1965 . Energy values of body in<br />
small mammals . Acta Ther . 10(23) :<br />
333-352 .<br />
Grodzinski, W ., Z. Pucek, and L . Ryszkowski .<br />
1966. Estimation of rodent numbers b y<br />
means of prebaiting and intensive removal .<br />
Acta Ther . 11(10) : 297-314 .<br />
Hayne, D . W. 1949 . Two methods for estimating<br />
population from trapping records . J .<br />
Mammalogy 30(4) : 399-411 .<br />
Leslie, P. H. 1952. The estimation of population<br />
parameters from data obtained by<br />
means of the capture-recapture method. II .<br />
The estimation of total numbers . Biometrika<br />
39(3&4): 363-388 .<br />
McNab, B . K. 1963 . A model of the energy<br />
budget of a wild mouse . Ecology 44(3) :<br />
521-532 .<br />
206
Miller, S. 1970. Small mammal populations i n<br />
a Douglas-fir forest : Cedar River, Washington.<br />
102 p. M .S. thesis on file at Univer .<br />
Wash ., Seattle .<br />
Pearson, O . 1947 . The rate of metabolism o f<br />
some small mammals. Ecology 28(7) :<br />
127-145 .<br />
1948 . Metabolism of small mammals<br />
with remarks on the lower limit of<br />
mammalian size . Science 108(2794) : 44 .<br />
Schwarz, S. S. 1967 . Indirect methods of estimating<br />
field metabolism of mammals . In K .<br />
Petrusewicz (ed.), Secondary productivity<br />
of terrestrial ecosystems, p. 225-239 .<br />
Warsaw, Poland : Panstwowe Wydawnictwo<br />
Naukowe .<br />
Zippin, C. 1958. The removal method of<br />
population estimation . J. Wildlife Manage .<br />
22(1) : 82-90 .<br />
207
Terrestrial Process Studies<br />
209
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Terrestrial process studies i n<br />
conifers: a review<br />
Abstract<br />
R . B . Walker, Department of Botan y<br />
D . R . M . Scott, College of <strong>Forest</strong> Resource s<br />
D . J. Salo, Department of Botan y<br />
aqd<br />
K . L . Reed, College of <strong>Forest</strong> Resources<br />
University of Washingto n<br />
Seattle, Washingto n<br />
A few studies on the physiological processes of conifers go back as much as a century, but most informatio n<br />
has been accumulated during the past 40 years . These efforts have involved most of the widely distribute d<br />
species to some extent, but limited information is available even on those species most studied, and very little<br />
on the remainder. With Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), the most studied species of our region, considerable<br />
information is available, but insufficient for process modeling . Of other species of the Western United State s<br />
much less is known . Thus intensive studies ofphysiological processes will be necessary in the Coniferous Biom e<br />
effort on each of the species of principal importance . In this paper, the current status of information on th e<br />
following topics is reviewed: CO 2 assimilation and respiration; transpiration, water conduction and wate r<br />
deficits; translocation of photosynthates; and mineral nutrition . Stomatal behavior and leaf resistance are<br />
considered with respect to the various gas exchanges . Energy budgets, nutrient cycling, growth, and modeling o f<br />
processes are closely related to the foregoing topics, but are covered elsewhere in this symposium.<br />
Introduction<br />
Central in the goals of the IBP is the measurement<br />
of productivity and production, and<br />
particularly the understanding and predictio n<br />
of these for vegetation and ecosystems . It<br />
follows that a basic knowledge of the physiological<br />
and related processes involved is<br />
essential to reaching these goals . In the Coniferous<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Biome our concern is naturally<br />
centered around the conifers, although associated<br />
deciduous and herbaceous species are<br />
also important. However, this review concentrates<br />
on the conifers as the species demanding<br />
our principal efforts .<br />
Experimentation with conifers, which began<br />
about a century ago and was taken up by<br />
various workers periodically, has been included<br />
in several general reviews in the Encyclopedia<br />
of Plant Physiology (Leyton 1958,<br />
Huber 1956, Stalfelt 1956, Pisek 1960), an d<br />
discussed in detail by Kramer and Kozlowski<br />
(1960) . Since then, a number of reviews concerning<br />
woody plants have covered various<br />
aspects: viz. food relations (Kozlowski an d<br />
Keller 1966), mineral nutrition (Baule an d<br />
Fricker 1967), and translocation (Zimmermann<br />
and Brown 1971) . Of course, the results<br />
of many experiments with broadleafed wood y<br />
plants are pertinent to conifers . Further, general<br />
principles established with herbaceou s<br />
plants may be applicable to conifers, although<br />
this carryover is more tenuous and in each<br />
case usually demands experimental verification .<br />
This review will concentrate on findings o f<br />
the past decade which, together with the<br />
work discussed in the reviews mentione d<br />
above, serves as the background on which th e<br />
studies of the Coniferous Biome are based .<br />
Included is considerable unpublished material<br />
211
from theses. The principal processes an d<br />
subjects which will be covered in sequence are<br />
(A) assimilation of CO 2 and respiration ,<br />
(B) transpiration, water conduction, an d<br />
water deficits, (C) translocation of photosynthates,<br />
and (D) mineral nutrition . Stomatal<br />
status and leaf resistance are considere d<br />
in relation to various aspects of gas exchange .<br />
Energy budgets, nutrient cycling, growth, and<br />
modeling of processes are considered b y<br />
other authors in this symposium, so are no t<br />
emphasized in this paper .<br />
Assimilation of CO 2<br />
and Respiration<br />
The principal emphasis in the IBP on assessment<br />
and understanding of dry matter<br />
production naturally focuses attention o n<br />
photosynthesis and the conditions and factors<br />
which influence its rate . Likewise the magnitude<br />
of respiratory losses is of complementary<br />
interest. Both short-term and long-term influences<br />
on the rates of these processes are o f<br />
importance in estimating seasonal and annual<br />
totals . Further, both inter- and intra-specifi c<br />
variability must be taken into account . Regardless<br />
of the factor under study, methods of<br />
individual measurement assume marked<br />
importance, and carrying over these measurements<br />
commonly made on portions of the<br />
plant to the entire forest stand is even mor e<br />
important. The latter aspect is considered i n<br />
the papers of this symposium on terrestrial<br />
modeling.<br />
Measuremen t<br />
The appearance in late 1971 of the detailed<br />
and authoritative book, Plant Photosyntheti c<br />
Production, Manual of Methods (Sestak,<br />
6atsky, and Jarvis, eds .), makes a detailed<br />
consideration of principles and techniques o f<br />
measurement unnecessary here . Thus a general<br />
consideration of methods and their applicability<br />
in the Coniferous Biome wil l<br />
suffice .<br />
Many useful studies have been performe d<br />
under controlled-environmental conditions ,<br />
using assimilation chambers of various types<br />
(Jarvis et al . 1971) . Such studies may be criticized<br />
on the basis that plants grown or hel d<br />
for study in controlled-environment rooms or<br />
boxes may behave differently from materia l<br />
growing under natural conditions . Thus a<br />
number of studies have been devoted to ga s<br />
exchange of conifers in the field (e .g., Botkin ,<br />
Woodwell, and Tempel 1970 ; Gentle 1963 ;<br />
Helms 1965, 1970 ; Hodges 1967 ; Hodges and<br />
Scott 1968; Kunstle 1971; Ungerson and<br />
Scherdin 1965; and Woodman 1971) . Also<br />
the extensive unpublished studies on Picea<br />
abies (L.) Karst of W . Koch' and of O . L .<br />
Lange and E . -0. Schulze 2 should be mentioned.<br />
To eliminate the influence of greenhouse<br />
or controlled-environment on the<br />
plants, several workers have used seedlings o r<br />
saplings brought in from the field or garden ,<br />
or made measurements on excised branches<br />
from field growing trees (Brix and Ebell 1969 ;<br />
Keller 1971 ; Parker 1963; Pisek, Larcher ,<br />
Moser, and Pack 1969 ; Pisek and Kemnitzer<br />
1968 ; and Poskuta 1968) .<br />
All of the measurements in the studies<br />
cited in the previous paragraph were made using<br />
assimilation chambers of various kinds .<br />
Difficulties and potential errors associate d<br />
with use of such enclosures are well covere d<br />
by Larcher (1969a) and Jarvis et al . (1971) .<br />
The major concerns pertain to excessive<br />
boundary layer resistances if stirring is inadequate,<br />
to significant departures of irradiatio n<br />
and energy balances from those of unenclose d<br />
foliage, and to errors inherent in the measuring<br />
itself .<br />
Techniques other than those using assimilation<br />
chambers are available (Larcher 1969a ,<br />
Denmead and Mcllroy 1971) . Harvest techniques<br />
give direct measurements of dry matte r<br />
accumulation, but must pertain with conifer s<br />
to time intervals of several weeks or months .<br />
Thus they cannot give information on responses<br />
to various controlling factors, nor d o<br />
they give information on respiratory losses .<br />
However, apart from their intrinsic value ,<br />
they may serve as an independent check on<br />
I <strong>Forest</strong> Botanical Institute, University of Munich ,<br />
Germany .<br />
2 Botanical Institute II, University of Wiirzburg ,<br />
Germany .<br />
212
the validity of extrapolating from assimilatio n<br />
chamber measurements to forest stands . Thus<br />
Botkin, Woodwell, and Tempel (1970) noted<br />
that values of production calculated fro m<br />
assimilation chamber data were about 30 per -<br />
cent above harvest values for the Brookhave n<br />
oak-pine forest . Meteorological techniques<br />
have been applied to conifer stands in a few<br />
cases (Baumgartner 1969, Denmead 1969 ,<br />
Kinerson 1971) . These can give values for en -<br />
tire stands without the influence of enclosures,<br />
but require large even stands, level<br />
topography, and uniform atmospheric conditions,<br />
thus measurement of either short or<br />
long term influences of factors affecting<br />
assimilation is very difficult. The use of<br />
meteorological data in combination wit h<br />
physiological information has potential fo r<br />
mathematical modeling and prediction of<br />
CO 2 assimilation (Reed and Webb 1972) .<br />
Difficulties arise in defining and measurin g<br />
the surfaces active in reception of light and i n<br />
CO 2 exchange. The general problems an d<br />
techniques for these assessments, particularl y<br />
in relation to broad-leafed plants and grasses ,<br />
are covered in the review of Kvet and Marshal l<br />
(1971) . The needle leaves of conifers usuall y<br />
have longitudinal rows of stomata on th e<br />
lower surface or on the interior surfaces i n<br />
fascicled species . Thus it is common to consider<br />
the "one-side" area as accounting fo r<br />
most of the gas exchange . Areas can be attained<br />
by tedious linear measuring and counting<br />
methods (Kvet and Marshall 1971 ,<br />
Madgwick 1964), but often dry weights o f<br />
foliage only have been reported to avoid thi s<br />
time-consuming effort. The introduction of<br />
the glass-bead technique (Thompson an d<br />
Leyton 1971) should encourage the determination<br />
of surface areas as well as dr y<br />
weights so that data can be compared between<br />
species . Further, because of the mathematical<br />
relations of gas diffusion and leaf<br />
resistances, most models of photosynthesi s<br />
require that values of photosynthesis b e<br />
expressed on a unit leaf area basis (Reed and<br />
Webb 1972) . The foliar distribution in crown s<br />
and stands must be obtained for extrapolation<br />
of gas exchange data, and several description s<br />
of such methods are available (Stephens 1969 ,<br />
Kinerson 1971) .<br />
Factors Affecting CO 2 Assimilation<br />
and Respiration<br />
In general, the principle of limiting factor s<br />
will apply to the relative importance of th e<br />
environmental and endogenous variables<br />
which control photosynthetic and respirator y<br />
rates. Thus in consideration of an individua l<br />
variable or factor, its effect may be masked at<br />
particular times by the limiting influence o f<br />
another factor. In the discussions of any individual<br />
factor which follows, it is implicit that<br />
the influences described are those of the<br />
factor when it is believed to be limiting the<br />
metabolic process (Stalfelt 1960) .<br />
Light Intensity<br />
Numerous studies in controlled-environmental<br />
systems and using excised branche s<br />
have shown that conifers exhibit typical<br />
limiting-factor response to light, with saturation<br />
dependent on the species and growing<br />
conditions (Pisek 1960) . For those species of<br />
principal interest in the Coniferous Biome a<br />
number of values for saturating light intensity<br />
have been reported (table 1) . These values are<br />
in general agreement with the range of<br />
1,850-3,200 ft-c stated by Polster (1967b) t o<br />
give maximal net photosynthesis in bot h<br />
broadleafed and coniferous trees, except for<br />
the value quoted by Kiinstle (1971) . Further<br />
verification of light responses under field conditions<br />
are needed for adequate modeling<br />
even of Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii<br />
(Mirb.) Franco. Western hemlock, Tsuga<br />
he te rophylla (Rafinesque) Sargent, Pin us<br />
ponderosa Laws., and the Abies species are<br />
much in need of further study with respect t o<br />
light .<br />
Recent studies on photorespiration and its<br />
enhancement with increasing light intensity i n<br />
spruce species (Poskuta 1968, Ludlow an d<br />
Jarvis 1971b) indicate the need to understand<br />
the variations of this process in the species o f<br />
special interest in the Coniferous Biome . This<br />
information will not be necessary for our<br />
earlier empirical models, but will become<br />
essential for more theoretically based model s<br />
in the future as well as being necessary for<br />
estimates of gross productivity .<br />
213
Table 1 .-Saturating light intensities for net photosynthesis in various species of conifers<br />
Description of plan t<br />
material<br />
Saturating ligh t<br />
intensity<br />
Author<br />
- - - foot-candle'-- -<br />
Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb .) Franco) :<br />
65-day-old seedlings grown with 1,100 ft-c 3,000 Krueger and Ferrell ,<br />
long day ; temp 19°C day, 9°C night 196 5<br />
100-day-old seedlings grown at 18°C and 1,000 ft-c 2,500 Brix, 196 7<br />
1-year-old seedlings-outdoor grown ca . 2,300 Krueger and Ruth, 196 9<br />
4-year-old seedlings grown in cans in the garden 2,000-3,000 Fry, 196 5<br />
2-year-old seedlings-nursery grown 1,600 Hodges, 196 5<br />
Current year foliage from 10-year-old ca. 4,600 Kunstle, 197 1<br />
trees (upper crown July-Aug . )<br />
Western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla (Rafinesque) Sargent) :<br />
2-year-old seedlings-nursery grown 1,400 Hodges, 1965<br />
1-year-old seedlings-outdoor grown Krueger and Ruth, 196 9<br />
in light shade 2,30 0<br />
in heavy shade 1,25 0<br />
Noble fir (Abies procera Rehd .) :<br />
2-year-old seedlings-nursery grown 2,000 Hodges, 196 5<br />
Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong .) Carr .) :<br />
1-year-old seedlings-outdoor grown Krueger and Ruth, 196 9<br />
in light shade 2,30 0<br />
in heavy shade 1,25 0<br />
2-year-old seedlings-nursery grown 1,400 Hodges, 196 5<br />
3- to 4-year-old seedlings and branches 1,450-1,930 Ludlow and Jarvis,<br />
from 10-year-old forest trees<br />
1971b<br />
1 1 foot-candle (ft-c) = 10 .8 lux ; 6,750 ft-c = 1 cal cm-2 min-e ; 1 Wm-2 = 1 .43 x 10-3 cal cm-2 min-l .<br />
Temperature<br />
The concomitant responses of respiratio n<br />
and gross photosynthesis to temperature ,<br />
modification by light and moisture regime s<br />
and adaptation, as well as special influences o f<br />
low and high temperatures, all make it difficult<br />
to clearly indicate the influence of<br />
temperature alone on these processes (Krame r<br />
and Kozlowski 1960, Kozlowski and Kelle r<br />
1966, Larcher 1969b, Polster 1967b) . Thu s<br />
Pisek and his collaborators (1969) quote d<br />
rather considerable ranges of optimal temperatures<br />
at 10,000 Lux for a list of Europea n<br />
species. The total ranges for the conifers i n<br />
this list extended from 9° to 22°C, with the<br />
means showing a much narrower range of 12°<br />
to 15°C . Larcher (1969b) assembled data o n<br />
summer temperature optima for some 1 8<br />
conifers . These varied from the low range of<br />
12°-16°C for Pinus cembra L. to the hig h<br />
range of 20°-22°C for Abies balsamea (Mill.) .<br />
Data for species of our special interest i n<br />
the Coniferous Biome are not abundant . For<br />
Douglas-fir seedlings values of 20°-25°C a t<br />
saturating light (Krueger and Ferrell 1965) ,<br />
and 18°-20°C at 1,000 ft-c (Brix 1967) hav e<br />
been reported . For 10-year-old saplings of thi s<br />
species growing in the garden we noted a<br />
somewhat lower range of 12°-17°C . 3 This<br />
3 R . B . Walker and D . J . Salo . Unpublished data .<br />
214
may be explained by the observation of Brix<br />
and Ebell (1969) that dry matter production<br />
of Douglas-fir shoots in bud dormancy had a<br />
broad optimal range of 12° to 24°C, with<br />
maximum increase in stem diameter and i n<br />
total plant dry weight at 18°C .<br />
Respiration is believed to follow the van't<br />
Hoff Q 1 0 relationship up to about 60°C ,<br />
where enzyme inactivation ensues . This is supported<br />
by measurements of dark respiration ,<br />
and by the fall off in net photosynthesi s<br />
above 20°-25°C (Pisek 1960, Larcher 1969b) .<br />
Studying current-year needles of 10-year-ol d<br />
Douglas-fir, Kiinstle (1971) found the Q1 0 of<br />
respiration of fully expanded needles to be<br />
about 2.2, but to be about 4 .0 in buds in late<br />
spring. Also Brix and Ebell (1969) noted a<br />
steady decline in dark respiration of Douglas -<br />
fir needles with years of age. However, more<br />
intensive study of respiration not only o f<br />
needles but of non-green parts will be neede d<br />
in our Biome effort for modeling production .<br />
This is even more pertinent for the specie s<br />
other than Douglas-fir .<br />
Since the evergreens may function through -<br />
out the year, special interest has long existe d<br />
in their responses to low temperatures (Pise k<br />
1960) . The low-temperature compensatio n<br />
points for conifers in the winter are in th e<br />
range of -5° to -8°C, which is also the expected<br />
range of freezing of the needle s<br />
(Larcher 1969b) . Again considering species of<br />
special interest in the Coniferous Biome, th e<br />
low-temperature compensation point fo r<br />
Sitka spruce proved to be -5°C (Ludlow an d<br />
Jarvis 1971b) . Respiration is very low a t<br />
temperatures below 5°C, and in our climat e<br />
such temperatures usually predominate onl y<br />
when light intensities are very low . Thus with<br />
light often limiting, temperature influences o n<br />
photosynthesis are small, and net assimilatio n<br />
in Douglas-fir was near the maximum fo r<br />
short times even at 0°C if illumination wa s<br />
less than 500 ft-c (see footnote 3) . However ,<br />
the assimilation rate declined if a temperatur e<br />
under 2°C was maintained for an hour or<br />
more .<br />
Wintertime depressions in photosyntheti c<br />
capacity have been studied frequently in th e<br />
past (Pisek 1960) . These declines have bee n<br />
attributed to a combination of stomatal<br />
closure and a probable biochemical facto r<br />
(Parker 1963), to stomatal closure in Picea<br />
abies, Pinus sylvestris L., and Juniperus cornmunis<br />
L. in northern Sweden (Ungerson an d<br />
Scherdin 1965), to a breakdown of the photo -<br />
synthetic apparatus in Pinus taeda L. (Perry<br />
and Baldwin 1966), to a reversible effect<br />
associated with freezing of the needles an d<br />
presumed dehydration in Abies alba Mill .<br />
(Pisek and Kemnitzer 1968), to adverse needle<br />
water relations (Zelawski and Kucharska<br />
1967), and to a typical seasonal behavior in<br />
pines (McGregor and Kramer 1963) . Seasonal<br />
variations will be considered in more detail i n<br />
a subsequent section .<br />
There is some information on high temperature<br />
compensation points of photosynthesis ,<br />
although nothing pertaining particularly to<br />
species of Western United States . The si x<br />
European conifers studied at Innsbruck (Pisek<br />
et al . 1968) varied from 46° to 50°C in heat<br />
resistance, and from 37° to 41°C in the maximum<br />
temperature for net photosynthesis . If<br />
our species fall into similar ranges, as seem s<br />
likely, there is little reason to be concerned<br />
with this aspect because only very occasionally<br />
would air temperatures reach the<br />
compensation value for photosynthesis in our<br />
region. Only if leaf temperatures should<br />
greatly exceed air temperatures on hot day s<br />
would this be a matter of interest.<br />
Carbon Dioxide<br />
Under favorable conditions of light intensity,<br />
temperature and moisture, carbo n<br />
dioxide concentration may sharply limi t<br />
photosynthesis . Thus Koch (1969) reported<br />
some threefold increase in yield of severa l<br />
conifers from raising CO 2 concentration to<br />
5X the normal atmospheric level in controlle d<br />
environment experiments. Also Fry (1965 )<br />
recorded a measurable increase in net assimila -<br />
tion of Douglas-fir saplings when he increase d<br />
CO 2 from ambient (0 .035 percent) to 0 .0 5<br />
percent if light intensity was above 1,600 ft-c .<br />
Likewise Ludlow and Jarvis (1971b) foun d<br />
that net photosynthesis of Sitka spruce seedlings<br />
increased almost linearly with CO 2 concentration<br />
as it was varied from 0 to 0 .0 4<br />
percent, then continued to rise less steeply t o<br />
215
at least 0 .06 percent CO 2 . However, in th e<br />
forest it is not feasible to increase CO 2 concentration<br />
except for the natural contributions<br />
from the soil and litter . It is important<br />
to make periodic checks in the field using in -<br />
creased CO 2 in assimilation chambers to<br />
detect if the ambient CO 2 concentration is<br />
limiting, and to minimize the "draw down" of<br />
CO 2 in enclosures to avoid excessive deviations<br />
from assimilation rates of the unenclosed<br />
foliage. Also the atmospheric CO 2 concentration<br />
is known to be variable, and this<br />
should be monitored for taking into account<br />
any limiting effect on photosynthesis .<br />
Water Defici t<br />
A substantial literature documents the reductions<br />
in CO2 assimilation in various species<br />
caused by even moderate water deficits<br />
(Kozlowski and Keller 1966) . Some reductio n<br />
may occur in the afternoon with high transpirational<br />
rates even on well-watered soils ,<br />
but lowered soil moisture is the principal<br />
cause of severe reductions . Using 4-yearold<br />
Douglas-fir saplings in containers, Fry<br />
(1965) found that depletion of bulk soil<br />
water to a potential of -5 bars reduced ne t<br />
photosynthesis to zero (compensation point )<br />
and reduced respiration to about 10 percen t<br />
of normal. Since needle water potential<br />
dropped to about -30 bars, soil water potential<br />
at the root surfaces was probably considerably<br />
below -5 bars. Hodges (1965, 1967) ,<br />
studying 2-year-old Douglas-fir seedlings in<br />
the field, found net assimilation closely correlated<br />
with leaf water potential . Using 7- to<br />
9-year-old saplings of about 0 .5-0.75-m height ,<br />
Hinckley (1971) found net assimilation in<br />
Abies amabilis (Dougl.) Forbes and Abie s<br />
procera Rehd. to drop sharply with reduced<br />
water potential (pressure chamber method) o f<br />
the needles, reaching 10 percent of maximu m<br />
assimilation at about -10 bars needle water<br />
potential in the A . procera, and at about -1 3<br />
bars in the A. amabilis .<br />
Such declines in net assimilation caused b y<br />
reduced soil moisture and lowered leaf wate r<br />
potential are well recognized to be caused b y<br />
increases in stomatal and other leaf resistance s<br />
(Fry 1965, Slatyer 1967, Slavik 1971, Jarvis<br />
1971) . Considerable information has bee n<br />
accumulated on stomatal behavior in Douglas -<br />
fir (Fry 1965, Reed 1968, Phillips 1967) ,<br />
ponderosa pine4 (Lopushinsky 1969), an d<br />
true firs (Lopushinsky 1969, Hinckley an d<br />
Ritchie 1970). However, meager informatio n<br />
is available on actual values for stomatal an d<br />
other leaf resistances in species of specia l<br />
interest in the Coniferous Biome . Fry (1965 )<br />
calculated stomatal resistance in Douglas-fi r<br />
saplings from stomatal infiltration pressures .<br />
From these pressures ranging from 0 .25 to<br />
1.65 atm he calculated stomatal resistances o f<br />
2.3 to 32 sec cm-1 for CO 2 , and additional<br />
leaf resistances of 3 .7 to 83 sec cm-1 . Ree d<br />
(1972) found general agreement with thes e<br />
values. Ludlow and Jarvis (1971b) reported<br />
stomatal resistances in Sitka spruce seedling s<br />
in excess of 20 sec cm-1 at very low irradiance<br />
or at very low temperatures, with normal<br />
values of about 4 sec c m ' . Their data showed<br />
mesophyll resistances of 20 to 30 sec cm-1 or<br />
more at very low irradiances and at very lo w<br />
temperatures, with normal values of about 6<br />
to 8 sec cm- ' . Leaf resistance is such an<br />
important factor that understanding stomatal<br />
and other components of resistance in all species<br />
of special interest in the Biome is necessary<br />
for the development of reasonable<br />
models of photosynthesis and transpiration .<br />
Mineral Nutrition<br />
A number of experiments have established<br />
that mineral deficiency may limit photosynthesis<br />
(Kozlowski and Keller 1966, Baule and<br />
Fricker 1967) . In the Pacific Northwest,<br />
nitrogen deficiency is common in forests, thu s<br />
making determination of the influences o f<br />
this element very important in the Coniferou s<br />
Biome program. The stands at the Cedar Rive r<br />
Watershed show incipient N deficiency, s o<br />
care will be taken to assess the influence o f<br />
this element. Keller (1971) recently reporte d<br />
a 50 percent increase in CO2 assimilation i n<br />
needles of Picea abies seedlings with increas e<br />
in N content from 0 .41 to 1 .11 percent . Also<br />
Brix (1971) recently measured increases i n<br />
4 A . P . Drew, L. G . Drew, and H . C . Fritts . Unpublished<br />
data .<br />
216
net assimilation in excised branches fro m<br />
24-year-old Douglas-fir trees which had been<br />
fertilized with N . However, the increases wer e<br />
noted only at light intensities of 2,000 ft- c<br />
and above .<br />
Diurnal and Seasonal Pattern s<br />
(including adaptation )<br />
Diurnal cycles or fluctuations in light, temperature,<br />
water vapor pressure gradients, an d<br />
other external factors are interactive with<br />
internal factors such as endogenous rhythm o f<br />
stomatal behavior, recovery from water deficit ,<br />
and translocation. Therefore the response of a<br />
tree day by day is very complex .<br />
Gentle (1963) and Helms (1965) studie d<br />
diurnal responses of 38-year-old Douglas-fir i n<br />
detail over a 4-year period . Superimposed o n<br />
the daily responses to light and darkness were<br />
short-term and longer term fluctuations attributable<br />
to varying temperature, radiation and<br />
cloud cover, relative humidity, water deficit,<br />
and undetermined influences . Midday depressions<br />
were common in the summer but also<br />
occurred in cool autumn weather . Similar detailed<br />
studies of diurnal behavior of the other<br />
species important in the Biome are lacking .<br />
The diurnal endogenous changes in stomatal<br />
aperture have been studied in several<br />
species. Fry (1965) noted that saplings grow n<br />
from seed gathered at Pack Demonstratio n<br />
<strong>Forest</strong>, La Grande, Washington, did no t<br />
exhibit any closing of the stomata during th e<br />
day or night if water status was favorable .<br />
This was largely confirmed by Reed (1968) ,<br />
although he observed a slight closing tendenc y<br />
at night. Phillips (1967) studied 38-year-old<br />
Douglas-fir trees at Pack Demonstration <strong>Forest</strong><br />
and found that the stomata of leaves i n<br />
the lower crown closed at night. A geographic<br />
or provenance difference in stomatal response<br />
of Douglas-fir was demonstrated in the field<br />
in southern Oregon, where stomata were open<br />
at night in the spring and early summer, but<br />
closed at night from July through September<br />
(Reed 1972). Drew, Drew, and Fritts (see<br />
footnote 4) and Lopushinsky (1969) independently<br />
observed that the stomata of Pinus<br />
ponderosa are closed at night . Abies amabilis<br />
growing in the field was observed to hav e<br />
more open stomata in early morning than did<br />
Abies procera, indicating that the stomata of<br />
A. amabilis were probably more open durin g<br />
the night (Hinckley 1971). The stomatal<br />
behavior of western hemlock is unknown an d<br />
needs attention .<br />
The influence of season of the year ha s<br />
already been touched on in connection with<br />
winter depression of assimilation . In a more<br />
general context, seasonal patterns of CO 2<br />
assimilation were studied by Gentle (1963)<br />
and by Helms (1964, 1965) in the 38-year-ol d<br />
Douglas-fir stand mentioned above . As would<br />
be expected, winter assimilation was low and<br />
quite variable, depending on the light an d<br />
temperature prevailing. Spring and autum n<br />
performances were good, although somewha t<br />
below the summer . Higher temperatures presumably<br />
made respiration a good deal highe r<br />
in the summer than in spring and autumn and .<br />
particularly than in the winter . Also Wood -<br />
man (1968, 1.971) studied net assimilation in<br />
one of the trees of this lame stand during th e<br />
growing season of 1967. A somewhat different<br />
pattern can be expected in conifers<br />
growing in regions with very dry summers ,<br />
with much Of the yearly total of photosynthesis<br />
occurring during the winter and spring .<br />
Such studies of seasonal patterns are imperative<br />
for adequate models of production in<br />
forest stands . This is particularly true becaus e<br />
a considerable number of variables in addition<br />
to those of the physical environment have<br />
marked influences (Kozlowski and, Kelle r<br />
1966). These include morphological variatio n<br />
(sun and shade foliage, stomatal distribution ,<br />
cuticular thickness, and others), adaptatio n<br />
with respect to light intensity and temperature<br />
in par icular, interspecific and intraspecific<br />
variations, shading, dormancy, age of<br />
foliage, position in the crown, and the natur e<br />
of past seasons . Some information on these<br />
features is available for Douglas-fir. However<br />
very limited knowledge, gained mostly fro m<br />
studies with seedlings, is available in this connection<br />
for the other species of special concern<br />
in the Coniferous Biome programwestern<br />
hemlock, ponderosa pine, and one of<br />
the true firs l Hodges and Scott 1968, Kruege r<br />
and Ruth 1969, Ludlow and Jarvis 1971b t<br />
217
Pharis et al. 1967). Again Helms (1970) ha s<br />
studied CO 2 assimilation in ponderosa pine<br />
during the summer in the natural environment,<br />
and envisions extending this study t o<br />
all seasons of the year. Intensive work on CO 2<br />
assimilation of all of the other species named<br />
above from the standpoints of environmenta l<br />
factors and the other influences on their behavior<br />
will be needed for realistic modeling o f<br />
their photosynthetic production .<br />
Water Relationships<br />
Although water deficit was taken up in th e<br />
previous section as a potential limiting facto r<br />
in CO 2 assimilation and respiration, the general<br />
subject of water relationships is of concern<br />
in water balance, nutrient cycling, an d<br />
other soil-plant-atmosphere relations, as wel l<br />
as in its effects on plant metabolism . Also th e<br />
balance between water absorption and transpiration<br />
determines any water deficit in th e<br />
plant. Water relationships of woody plants<br />
were thoroughly reviewed by Polster (1967a) .<br />
Water Absorptio n<br />
The factors affecting water uptake in<br />
woody plants were discussed in detail i n<br />
Kramer and Kozlowski (1960) . In the usuall y<br />
well-drained and well-aerated soils of the<br />
western forests, temperature of the soil an d<br />
roots and the level of soil moisture are th e<br />
principal factors affecting water uptake in th e<br />
root zone. These factors are being regularl y<br />
monitored at the intensive study sites of th e<br />
Biome . Their influence will be of most concern<br />
in the magnitude of water deficits . Sinc e<br />
water uptake is wholly passive during times o f<br />
high water use, increased resistance to uptake<br />
in the root zone can be expected to enhanc e<br />
water deficits . Further, rate of water uptake<br />
and conduction may exert some effect o n<br />
mineral uptake (Slatyer 1967) . Investigation s<br />
of water uptake will probably not be a part o f<br />
the Biome studies, because of the difficultie s<br />
of measuring this quantity in large soil-roote d<br />
plants, and the near equivalence of absorptio n<br />
rates to transpiration rates .<br />
Water Conduction<br />
For woody plants, this aspect has bee n<br />
thoroughly reviewed, including special features<br />
of conifers, by several authors (Hube r<br />
1956, Kramer and Kozlowski 1960, Zimmermann<br />
and Brown 1971) . With reference to th e<br />
objectives of the Coniferous Biome, interes t<br />
in conduction pertains to the magnitude o f<br />
negative sap pressures (as a measure of water<br />
deficit), to its use as an indicator of transpirational<br />
fluctuations where actual transpirational<br />
measurements can not be made readily ,<br />
to intra-tree water adjustments includin g<br />
potential storage in stems and branches, an d<br />
to its influence on rate of translocation of<br />
mineral nutrients . Nonetheless, rates of conduction<br />
will be inferred of necessity for ou r<br />
models from transpirational rates . However ,<br />
some indication of the nature of potential<br />
storage of water in stems or branches may b e<br />
attained from measurements using sap velocity<br />
flow meters and by study of intra-crown<br />
variation in the sap pressure (Scholander technique)<br />
(Waring and Cleary 1967) of stems an d<br />
needles (Hinckley 1971, Ritchie 1971) .<br />
Transpiratio n<br />
The predominant interest in water relation -<br />
ships is with transpiration both from a hydro -<br />
logic viewpoint concerned with total plan t<br />
use, and from its influence on water deficit s<br />
and on resistance to water vapor and CO 2<br />
transfer. This major interest has resulted i n<br />
substantial work on the transpiration of conifers,<br />
and considerable attention to species o f<br />
interest in the Coniferous Biome . Thes e<br />
studies will be considered below under th e<br />
headings of measurement, influence of environmental<br />
factors, effects of leaf temperature<br />
and resistances, and the significance of<br />
water deficits .<br />
Measuremen t<br />
Although there are various methods fo r<br />
measurement of transpiration, in the fiel d<br />
with large plants the air-flow method using<br />
leaf enclosures, lysimeter systems, meteorological<br />
techniques, and tritiated water<br />
methods are most feasible. The air-flo w<br />
218
method, using psychrometers or infra-red ga s<br />
analyzers as the detecting instruments, is commonly<br />
applied to plant material enclosed i n<br />
assimilation chambers . The possible artifact s<br />
of the systems pointed out for CO 2 assimilation<br />
measurements (Jarvis et al . 1971) are<br />
even more critical in the case of transpirational<br />
assessments . This is true because of th e<br />
role of energy balance and resulting lea f<br />
temperature in determining the vapor pressur e<br />
gradient from leaf to atmosphere . Also<br />
adsorption and condensation problems ofte n<br />
make measurements difficult and less accurat e<br />
during cool moist periods either diurnal or seasonal,<br />
although rates are characteristically low<br />
under such conditions . The lysimeter technique<br />
is suited to diurnal and seasonal studie s<br />
without the artificiality of enclosing th e<br />
foliage (Fritschen 1972) . Root disturbance<br />
occurs in installation, but this should hav e<br />
little effect on transpiration and passive up -<br />
take of water . Meteorological methods, whic h<br />
measure evapotranspiration, also maintai n<br />
natural conditions around the foliage, bu t<br />
necessitate sizable stands of homogenous<br />
vegetation and uniform air conditions for bes t<br />
measurements. The tritiated water metho d<br />
(Kline et al . 1972) yields information on transpirational<br />
activity only over periods of hour s<br />
and days, but its advantage over the other<br />
methods lies in its applicability to very larg e<br />
trees, such as the 75-m-tall old-growt h<br />
Douglas-firs in the H . J. <strong>Andrews</strong> <strong>Experimental</strong><br />
<strong>Forest</strong>. During certain periods o f<br />
1972, all four of these methods of transpirational<br />
measurement will be compared at th e<br />
Thompson Research Center (Cedar River) .<br />
The lysimeter study will be continuou s<br />
throughout the 1972 spring through autum n<br />
season, and the simultaneous measurement o f<br />
transpired water in the gas stream from the<br />
assimilation cuvettes will permit estimation of<br />
leaf resistance as well as giving data on transpirational<br />
rates .<br />
Influence of Environmental Factors<br />
General discussions of these factors an d<br />
their influences have been given by Stalfelt<br />
(1956), Kramer and Kozlowski (1960), an d<br />
Kozlowski and Keller (1966) . Emphasis here<br />
will be on more recent studies with conifers<br />
and especially with species of special concern<br />
in the Coniferous Biome .<br />
The dominant influence of the vapor pressure<br />
gradient from leaf to air on transpirational<br />
rate when stomata are open has long<br />
been recognized. This was verified by Ritchie<br />
(1971) in a study with Abies amabilis and A .<br />
procera of about 14-m height, using vapor<br />
pressure gradient and also saturation deficit of<br />
the atmosphere . On a statistical basis, th e<br />
latter value accounted for 56 percent of th e<br />
variation in transpirational rate on a seasona l<br />
basis .<br />
Depletion of soil moisture has also lon g<br />
been recognized as a major factor in the control<br />
of transpiration . This was verified by<br />
Mullerstael (1968) using three species of pine ,<br />
as well as other evergreens, and he als o<br />
showed marked species differences . Hinckley<br />
(1971) showed great reduction in transpiration<br />
(sap velocity) in Abies amabilis and A .<br />
procera with soil water depletion. Reed<br />
(1972) developed a computer simulation o f<br />
transpiration in the field . He showed that lo w<br />
vapor pressure gradients limited transpiratio n<br />
in the spring, but increased stomatal resistance<br />
resulting from depleted soil moisture an d<br />
water deficits limited transpiration during th e<br />
summer. He also showed that the availabl e<br />
soil moisture can vary greatly from year t o<br />
year, which can cause considerable seasonal<br />
and annual differences in total transpiration .<br />
Although moderate air movement is commonly<br />
recognized as a factor which increase s<br />
transpiration because boundary layers are reduced,<br />
few studies have been conducted with<br />
high air velocities. Tranquillini (1969) varied<br />
wind velocity from 0 .5 to 20 m sec-1 , and<br />
observed that net assimilation of Pinu s<br />
cembra increased somewhat up to about 4 m<br />
sec-t , then declined . In Picea abies the decline<br />
started at 1 .5 m sec-t . Caldwell (1970), working<br />
with the same Pinus cembra plants ,<br />
showed that stomatal aperture and transpiration<br />
rate were only slightly reduced by hig h<br />
wind speeds, but photosynthesis was reduce d<br />
considerably because of changes in needle display<br />
to the light. High wind would be expected<br />
to be of importance in the Coniferou s<br />
Biome only in extreme habitats .<br />
219
Effects of Leaf Temperature an d<br />
Leaf Resistances<br />
Leaf temperature establishes the vapo r<br />
pressure of water in the intercellular spaces o f<br />
the leaf, thus it is imperative to have goo d<br />
measurements of this value to accompan y<br />
transpirational (and net assimilation) estimations<br />
. Methods for determination of lea f<br />
temperature have been recently described i n<br />
detail (Perrier 1971) .<br />
Although transpirational rates may approach<br />
potential evaporation with favorabl e<br />
soil and leaf water status, commonly leaf<br />
resistances markedly impede water loss . This<br />
was well demonstrated by Waggoner an d<br />
Turner (1971) in a study of transpiration in<br />
Pinus resinosa Ait. with both natural and<br />
artificially induced stomatal closure markedly<br />
reducing transpiration . The separation of stomatal<br />
and other leaf resistance is very desirable<br />
when feasible (Jarvis 1971) . The influence<br />
of wax in the stomatal pores in reducin g<br />
transpiration in Sitka spruce was noted by<br />
Jeffree et al . (1971) . Similar wax accumulations<br />
increasing with age of needles i n<br />
Douglas-fir have recently been observed o n<br />
material collected from the 35-year-old tree s<br />
at the Thompson Research Center (Cedar<br />
River) . 5 In the Coniferous Biome studies ,<br />
more information is needed on these resistances<br />
in all species for successful productio n<br />
models .<br />
Significance of Water Deficit s<br />
Conifer species differ in their ability to<br />
maintain photosynthetic production in th e<br />
presence of water deficits, and in their abilit y<br />
to control water loss under similar environmental<br />
conditions (Hodges and Scott 1968) .<br />
The status of woody plants can be assesse d<br />
over the season by periodic tests of the pre -<br />
dawn pressure chamber value (Waring an d<br />
Cleary 1967), and this used in establishin g<br />
moisture gradients and ecological tolerance s<br />
and distributions. In the Coniferous Biom e<br />
such assessments are needed throughout th e<br />
growing season over wide geographic areas<br />
5 P. Machno and K . L. Reed. Unpublished data<br />
with all species of primary interest, and this<br />
program is already well under way (Waring et<br />
al. 1972) .<br />
Translocation<br />
of Photosynthates<br />
and Relations to Growth<br />
The translocation of photosynthate in<br />
woody plants was thoroughly reviewed b y<br />
Kozlowski and Keller (1966), and very recently<br />
discussed in detail by Zimmerman n<br />
and Brown (1971) .<br />
Among the conifers the pines, especiall y<br />
Pinus resinosa, have received the greatest attention<br />
(Rangnekar et al . 1969, Dickman n<br />
and Kozlowski 1970) . The former group ,<br />
working with 15-year-old trees in a plantation,<br />
found that each branch appeared to b e<br />
self-supporting, contributing more liberally t o<br />
its own growth than to the tree leader, whic h<br />
probably expands in part from reserve carbohydrates<br />
. Further, they suggested that th e<br />
products of cambial growth are largely de -<br />
rived from current photosynthate . The results<br />
of Dickmann and Kozlowski (1970), wh o<br />
labeled the 1-year-old needles of second-orde r<br />
branches of 20-year-old trees, are in general<br />
agreement with this, as they found that recovery<br />
from the various sinks was high and i n<br />
the order : 2d-year cones > terminal needles ><br />
lateral needles > terminal internode > latera l<br />
internodes > 1-year-old wood .<br />
Ross (1972) labeled different-aged branc h<br />
segments of 9-year-old Douglas-fir trees o f<br />
about 6-m height . He likewise was able t o<br />
discern source-sink relationships. The proportion<br />
of 14 CO 2 exported from needles was a<br />
function of their age, of the attractive "pull"<br />
of external sinks, and inversely of water<br />
stress . One-year-old needles exported a large r<br />
proportion of their photosynthate than di d<br />
current-year needles even late in the growin g<br />
season . The attractive "pull" of the sink s<br />
decreased in the order: elongating ne w<br />
1st-order internodes and needles, elongatin g<br />
new 2d-order internodes and needles, an d<br />
stem . The fact that 1-year-old needles mainly<br />
supplied adjacent new shoots and thus ex -<br />
220
ported little photosynthate basipetally in contrast<br />
with the preferential translocation of<br />
photosynthate toward the stem by 2-year-ol d<br />
needles may be explained by the ability of a<br />
sink such as the stem to mobilize photosynthate<br />
falling off with distance in a n<br />
approximately logarithmic manner .<br />
These studies give clues to the relationships<br />
between CO 2 assimilation in the leaves an d<br />
the formation and differentiation of new cells<br />
in apical and cambial growth . These relationships<br />
are not simple, and care must be take n<br />
to avoid oversimplified connections . For<br />
example, net assimilation rates can give an<br />
index of amounts of photosynthate availabl e<br />
for growth only if position and age of th e<br />
foliage studied are taken into account (Ros s<br />
1972). With caution, however, net assimilation<br />
rates taken in different parts of th e<br />
crown can be used to estimate daily mean<br />
assimilation and the total photosynthate production,<br />
on the basis of the whorls o f<br />
branches of different heights (Woodman<br />
1968, 1971) .<br />
In the Coniferous Biome studies, effort s<br />
must be made to bring together net assimilation,<br />
translocation, and terminal and lateral<br />
growth into a workable model . It may be<br />
necessary in such efforts to take into accoun t<br />
growth inhibitors and promoters in such a<br />
model, since Lavender and Hermann (1970 )<br />
have pointed out the importance of thes e<br />
substances in their studies of light and photo -<br />
period effects in Douglas-fir . Although there<br />
is information to build on with respect to re d<br />
pine and Douglas-fir (see above), further wor k<br />
will be necessary with Douglas-fir to utiliz e<br />
the information effectively . Clearly, specifi c<br />
studies of translocation and growth in wester n<br />
hemlock, ponderosa pine, and a true fir ar e<br />
needed .<br />
Mineral Nutrition<br />
A number of books cover the general field<br />
of mineral nutrition and specifically that of<br />
forest tree species (Baule and Fricker 1967 ,<br />
Bengtson 1968, Epstein 1972) . The aspects of<br />
particular concern in the Coniferous Biom e<br />
are mineral uptake and cycling, and the role<br />
of mineral elements in metabolic processes .<br />
Mineral cycling studies in second-growt h<br />
Douglas-fir forests have been carried out for<br />
over a decade (Grier and Cole 1972) . Mineral<br />
cycling is important in the nutrition of th e<br />
trees since limited nutrient capital is available .<br />
These studies need to be extended to th e<br />
other species of special importance in th e<br />
Coniferous Biome program .<br />
The importance of nitrogen in chlorophyll<br />
production and the close correlation between<br />
chlorophyll contents and CO 2 uptake were<br />
pointed out by Keller and Wehrmann (1967 )<br />
with reference to Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris<br />
. The widespread occurrence of nitrogen<br />
deficiency in Douglas-fir in western Washington<br />
and Oregon (Gessel et at . 1965) give s<br />
reason for careful attention to this element i n<br />
studies of coastal Douglas-fir in the Coniferous<br />
Biome . Also it will be wise to make a<br />
sufficiently broad spectrum of mineral analyses<br />
to detect low levels of other element s<br />
which might be limiting photosynthesis or<br />
growth .<br />
The foregoing indicates that a large back -<br />
ground of information on terrestrial production<br />
processes in woody plants is already<br />
available. With respect to Douglas-fir, the<br />
species currently receiving most emphasis i n<br />
the Coniferous Biome, the background i s<br />
appreciable and useful, but often lacking i n<br />
specific data needed for the construction of<br />
mathematical models . These deficiencies must<br />
be made up for adequate modeling of processes<br />
in this species. With other species of<br />
special concern in the Biome-western hemlock,<br />
ponderosa pine, and true firs-muc h<br />
more background information as well as<br />
specific data is needed in order to develo p<br />
effective production models .<br />
A cknowledgments<br />
The work reported in this paper was sup -<br />
ported in part by the University of Washingto n<br />
and in part by National Science Foundatio n<br />
Grant No. GB-20963 to the Coniferous Fores t<br />
Biome, U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems, Inter -<br />
national Biological Program . This is Contribution<br />
No . 37 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome .<br />
221
Literature Cited<br />
Baule, H., and C. Fricker. 1967 . The fertilizer<br />
treatment of forest trees . (Transl . from<br />
German .) 259 p. Munich : BLV Verlagsges .<br />
Baumgartner, A. 1969. Meteorological approach<br />
to the exchange of CO 2 betwee n<br />
the atmosphere and vegetation, particularl y<br />
forest stands . Photosynthetica 3(2) :<br />
127-249 .<br />
Bengtson, G . W . (ed .) . 1968 . <strong>Forest</strong> fertilization<br />
: theory and practice . 306 p . Muscl e<br />
Shoals, Ala . : Tenn. Valley Authority .<br />
Botkin, D., G. M . Woodwell, and Neal<br />
Tempel. 1970. <strong>Forest</strong> productivity estimated<br />
from carbon dioxide uptake .<br />
Ecology 51 : 1057-1060 .<br />
Brix, H . 1967 . An analysis of dry matter production<br />
of Douglas-fir seedlings in relatio n<br />
to temperature and light intensity . Can . J .<br />
Bot. 45 : 2063-2072 .<br />
1971 . Effects of nitrogen fertilization<br />
on photosynthesis and respiration in<br />
Douglas-fir. <strong>Forest</strong> Sci . 17 : 407-414 .<br />
and L . F. Ebell . 1969 . Effects of<br />
nitrogen fertilization on growth, leaf area ,<br />
and photosynthesis rate in Douglas-fir . <strong>Forest</strong><br />
Sci. 15 : 189-195 .<br />
Caldwell, M. M . 1970. Plant gas exchange a t<br />
high wind speeds . Plant Physiol. 46(4) :<br />
535-537 .<br />
Denmead, O . T. 1969. Comparative micrometeorology<br />
of a wheat field and a forest<br />
of Pin us radiata . Agric. Meteorol. 6 :<br />
357-371 .<br />
and I. C. Mcllroy. 1971. Measurement<br />
of carbon dioxide exchange in th e<br />
field . In Z . Sestak, J . 6atsky, and P . G .<br />
Jarvis (eds.), Plant photosynthetic production,<br />
manual of methods, p . 467-516 . Th e<br />
Hague : Dr . W . Junk N .V . Publishers .<br />
Dickmann, D . I ., and T. T. Kozlowski. 1970 .<br />
Mobilization and incorporation of photo -<br />
assimilated 14 C by growing vegetation an d<br />
reproductive tissues of adult Pinus resinosa<br />
trees. Plant Physiol . 45 : 284-288 .<br />
Epstein, E . 1972. Mineral nutrition of plants :<br />
principles and perspectives, 412 p . New<br />
York: John Wiley and Sons .<br />
Fritschen, L . J. 1972. The lysimeter installation<br />
on the Cedar River watershed . In<br />
Proceedings-research on coniferous forest<br />
ecosystems-a symposium, p . 255-260, illus.<br />
Pac. Northwest <strong>Forest</strong> & Range Exp . Stn . ,<br />
Portland, Oreg .<br />
Fry, K . E. 1965. A study of transpiration an d<br />
photosynthesis in relation to the stomatal<br />
resistance and internal water potential i n<br />
Douglas-fir. 192 p. Ph.D. thesis on file ,<br />
Univ . Wash ., Seattle .<br />
Gentle, S . W. 1963 . The effect of local weather<br />
conditions on the assimilation of carbo n<br />
dioxide by Douglas-fir in western Washing -<br />
ton. 122 p . Ph .D. thesis on file, Univ .<br />
Wash., Seattle .<br />
Gessel, S . P., T. N . Stoate, and K . J. Turnbull ,<br />
1965 . The growth behavior of Douglas-fi r<br />
with nitrogenous fertilizer in western Washington<br />
. Res . Bull. No. 1, 204 p . Coll. For . ,<br />
Univ . Wash., Seattle .<br />
Grier, Charles C ., and Dale W . Cole. 1972 .<br />
Elemental transport changes occurring during<br />
development of a second-growth Douglas-fir<br />
ecosystem . In Proceedings-research<br />
on coniferous forest ecosystems-a symposium,<br />
p . 103-113, illus . Pac. Northwest<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> & Range Exp . Stn., Portland, Oreg .<br />
Helms, J. A. 1964. Apparent photosynthesi s<br />
of Douglas fir in relation to silvicultural<br />
treatment . <strong>Forest</strong> Sci . 10: 432-442 .<br />
1965. Diurnal and seasonal patterns<br />
of net assimilation in Douglas-fir, a s<br />
influenced by environment . Ecology 46 :<br />
698-708 .<br />
1970. Summer net photo -<br />
synthesis of ponderosa pine in its natura l<br />
habitat. Photosynthetica 4(3) : 243-253 .<br />
Hinckley, T . M. 1971 . Plant water stress an d<br />
its effect on ecological patterns of behavior<br />
in several Pacific Northwest conifer species ,<br />
177 p . Ph .D . thesis on file, Univ . Wash . ,<br />
Seattle .<br />
and G . A. Ritchie . 1970 . Within -<br />
crown patterns of transpiration, wate r<br />
stress, and stomatal activity in Abies<br />
amabilis . <strong>Forest</strong> Sci . 16: 490-492 .<br />
222
Hodges, J . D. 1965. Photosynthesis in forest<br />
tree seedlings of the Pacific Northwest<br />
under natural environmental conditions .<br />
177 p. Ph.D. thesis on file, Univ . Wash . ,<br />
Seattle .<br />
1967. Patterns of photosynthesis<br />
under natural conditions . Ecology<br />
48: 234-242 .<br />
and D. R. M. Scott. 1968 .<br />
Photosynthesis in seedlings of six conifer<br />
species under natural environmental conditions.<br />
Ecology 49 : 973-980 .<br />
Huber, B . 1956. Die Gefassleitung. In W .<br />
Ruhland (ed .), Handb . Pflanzenphysiol . III :<br />
541-582 .<br />
Jarvis, P. G. 1971 . The estimation of resistances<br />
to carbon dioxide transfer . In Z .<br />
Sestak, J. Jatsky, and P . G. Jarvis (eds .) ,<br />
Plant photosynthetic production, manua l<br />
of methods, p. 566-631 . The Hague : Dr. W .<br />
Junk N .V. Publishers .<br />
J. Catsky, F. E. Eckardt, W .<br />
Koch, and D. Koller. 1971 . General principles<br />
of gasometric methods and the mai n<br />
aspects of installation design . In Z . Sestak ,<br />
J. Catsky, and P . G. Jarvis (eds.), Plant<br />
photosynthetic production, manual of<br />
methods, p . 49-110 . The Hague : Dr. W .<br />
Junk N .V . Publishers .<br />
Jeffree, C. E ., R. P. C. Johnson, and P . G .<br />
Jarvis. 1971 . Epicuticular wax in the stomatal<br />
antechamber of Sitka spruce and its<br />
effects on the diffusion of water vapour<br />
and carbon dioxide. Planta 98 : 1-10 .<br />
Keller, Theo. 1971. Der Einfluss der Stickstoffernahrung<br />
auf den Gaswechsel der<br />
Fichte. Allg. Forst- u . Jagdzt. 142(4) :<br />
89-93 .<br />
and J. Wehrmann . 1963 . C02<br />
assimilation, Wurzelatmung and Ertrag vo n<br />
Fichten and Kiefersamlingen bei unterschiedlichen<br />
Mineralstoffernahrung. Mitt .<br />
Schweiz . Anst. Forstl. Versuchsw . 39(4) :<br />
217-242 .<br />
Kinerson, R .,Jr. 1971 . Selected aspects of gas<br />
and energy exchange in a young, matur e<br />
Douglas-fir stand . 91 p. Ph.D. thesis on file ,<br />
Univ . Wash ., Seattle .<br />
Kline, J . R ., M . L. Stewart, and C . F. Jordan .<br />
1972 . Estimation of biomass and transpiration<br />
in coniferous forests using tritiated<br />
water . In Proceedings-research on coniferous<br />
forest ecosystems-a symposium, p .<br />
159-166, illus. Pac. Northwest <strong>Forest</strong> &<br />
Range Exp. Stn ., Portland, Oreg .<br />
Koch, W. 1969 . Untersuchungen caber di e<br />
Wirkung von CO 2 auf die Photosynthese<br />
einiger Holzgewachse unter Laboratoriumsbedingungen.<br />
Flora 158 : 402-428 .<br />
Kozlowski, T., and Theo. Keller . 1966. Food<br />
relations of woody plants . Bot. Rev . 32(4) :<br />
293-382 .<br />
Kramer, P . J., and T . Kozlowski . 1960 . Physiology<br />
of trees. 642 p . New York : McGraw-<br />
Hill Co .<br />
Krueger, K . W., and W . K. Ferrell . 1965 . Comparative<br />
photosynthetic and respiratory<br />
responses to temperature and light by Pseudotsuga<br />
menziesii var. menziesii and var .<br />
glauca seedlings . Ecology 46 : 794-801 .<br />
and R . H. Ruth. 1969 . Comparative<br />
photosynthesis of red alder, Douglas -<br />
fir, Sitka spruce, and western hemloc k<br />
seedlings . Can . J. Bot . 47: 519-528 .<br />
Kunstle, E . 1971. Der Jahresgang de s<br />
CO 2 -Gaswechsel von einj ihrigen Douglasien-trieben<br />
in einem 20 ja"hrige m<br />
Bestand. Allg. Forst- u. Jagdzt. 142(4) :<br />
105-108 .<br />
Kvet, J ., and J. K. Marshall. 1971 . Assessment<br />
of leaf area and other assimilating surfaces .<br />
In Z . Sestak, J. Catsky, and P. G . Jarvis<br />
(eds.), Plant photosynthetic production ,<br />
manual of methods, p . 517-555 . The<br />
Hague : Dr . W. Junk N .V. Publishers .<br />
Larcher, W. 1969a. Physiological approache s<br />
to the measurement of photosynthesis i n<br />
relation to dry matter production by trees .<br />
Photosynthetica 3(2) : 150-166 .<br />
1969b . The effect of environmental<br />
and physiological variables on the<br />
carbon dioxide gas exchange of trees .<br />
Photosynthetica 3(2) : 167-198 .<br />
Lavender, D. P., and R. K. Hermann. 1970 .<br />
Regulation of the growth potential of<br />
Douglas-fir seedlings during dormancy .<br />
New Phytol . 69 : 675-694 .<br />
Leyton, L. 1958 . The mineral requirements of<br />
forest plants . In W . Ruhland (ed .), Handb .<br />
Pflanzenphysiol . IV : 1026-1039 .<br />
223
Lopushinsky, W . 1969. Stomatal closure i n<br />
conifer seedlings in response to leaf moisture<br />
stress . Bot . Gaz . 130 : 258-263 .<br />
Ludlow, M . M ., and P . J. Jarvis. 1971a . Methods<br />
for measuring photorespiration i n<br />
leaves . In Z . Sestak, J. Catsky, and P . G .<br />
Jarvis (eds .), Plant photosynthetic production,<br />
manual of methods, p . 294-315 . Th e<br />
Hague : Dr. W . Junk N .V . Publishers .<br />
and P . J. Jarvis. 1971b . Photo -<br />
synthesis in Sitka spruce . 1 . General characteristics<br />
. J . Appl . Ecol . 8(3) : 925-953 .<br />
McGregor, W . H. D ., and P . J. Kramer . 1963 .<br />
Seasonal trends in rates of photosynthesi s<br />
and respiration of loblolly pine and whit e<br />
pine seedlings . Am . J. Bot. 50(8) : 760-765 .<br />
Madgwick, H . A. 1964 . Estimation of surface<br />
area of pine needles with special reference<br />
to Pinus resinosa . J. For . 62 : 636 .<br />
Miillerstael, H . 1968 . Untersuchungen uber<br />
den Gaswechsel zweijahriger Holzpflanze n<br />
bei fortschreitender Bodenaustrocknung .<br />
Beitr. Biol. Pflanz. 44(3) : 319-341 .<br />
Parker, J. 1963. Causes of the winter decline<br />
in transpiration and photosynthesis in some<br />
evergreens. <strong>Forest</strong> Sci . 9 : 148-166 .<br />
Perrier, A. 1971 Leaf temperature measurement<br />
. In Z . Sestak, J . Catsky, and P . G .<br />
Jarvis (eds.), Plant photosynthetic production,<br />
manual of methods, p . 632-671 . The<br />
Hague : Dr . W. Junk N .V. Publishers .<br />
Perry, T. O., and G . W . Baldwin. 1966 . Winter<br />
breakdown of the photosynthetic apparatus<br />
of evergreen species . <strong>Forest</strong> Sci. 12 :<br />
298-300 .<br />
Pharis, R. P., H. Hellmers, and E . Schuurmans.<br />
1967. Kinetics of the daily rate of<br />
photosynthesis at low temperature for two<br />
conifers. Plant Physiol. 42(4) : 525-531 .<br />
Phillips, R. A. 1967. Stomatal characteristic s<br />
throughout a tree crown . 67 p . M .S . thesis<br />
on file, Univ . Wash., Seattle .<br />
P i s e k, A . 1960. Die photosynthetische n<br />
Leistungen von Pflanzen besonder e<br />
Standorte : immergrune Pflanzen . In W .<br />
Ruhland (ed.), Handb . Pflanzenphysiol .<br />
V 2 : 415-459 .<br />
and R. Kemnitzer . 1968 . Der<br />
Einfluss von Frost auf die Photosynthes e<br />
der Weisstanne (Abies alba) . Flora 157 B :<br />
314-326 .<br />
, W . Larcher, W . Moser, and I .<br />
Pack . 1969 . Temperaturabhangigkeit an d<br />
optimaler Temperaturbereich der Netto -<br />
Photosynthese . Flora 158 B: 608-630 .<br />
, W . Larcher, I . Pack, and R .<br />
Unterholzner . 1968 . Temperaturmaximu m<br />
der Netto-Photosynthese and Hitzeresistenz<br />
der Blatter. Flora 158 B: 110-128 .<br />
Polster, H . 1967a . Wasserhaushalt . In H. Lyr ,<br />
H. Polster, and H . -J . Fiedler, Geholzphysiologie,<br />
p . 147-196 . Jena : G . Fischer Verlag .<br />
1967b. Photosynthese, Atmung ,<br />
and Stoffproduktion . In H . Lyr, H . Polster ,<br />
and H. -J . Fiedler, Geholzphysiologie, p .<br />
197-246 . Jena : G . Fischer Verlag .<br />
Poskuta, J . 1968 . Photosynthesis, photorespiration<br />
and respiration of detached<br />
spruce twigs as influenced by oxygen concentration<br />
and light intensity . Physiol .<br />
Plant . 21 : 1129-1136 .<br />
Rangnekar, P . V ., D . F . Forward, and N . J .<br />
Nolan. 1969 . Foliar nutrition and wood<br />
growth in red pine : the distribution of<br />
radiocarbon photoassimilated by individual<br />
branches of young trees . Can . J. Bot. 47 :<br />
1701-1711 .<br />
Reed, K. L. 1968 . The effects of sub-zero<br />
temperatures on the stomata of Douglas-fir .<br />
79 p . M .S. thesis on file, Univ . Wash . ,<br />
Seattle .<br />
1972 . A computer simulation<br />
model of seasonal transpiration in Douglas -<br />
fir based on a model of stomatal resistance .<br />
133 p. Ph.D. thesis on file, Oreg . State<br />
Univ ., Corvallis .<br />
Reed, Kenneth L ., and Warren L. Webb .<br />
1972 . Criteria for selecting an optima l<br />
model : terrestrial photosynthesis . In<br />
Proceedings-research on coniferous forest<br />
ecosystems-a symposium, p . 227-236 ,<br />
illus. Pac . Northwest <strong>Forest</strong> & Range Exp .<br />
Stn., Portland, Oreg .<br />
Ritchie, G. A. 1971 . Transpiration, water<br />
potential and stomatal activity in relatio n<br />
to microclimate in Abies amabilis an d<br />
Abies procera in a natural environment .<br />
226 p. Ph.D. thesis on file, Univ . Wash . ,<br />
Seattle .<br />
Ross, Stephen D . 1972. The seasonal an d<br />
diurnal source-sink relationships for photo -<br />
assimilated 14 CO 2 in the Douglas-fi r<br />
224
anch. 170 p . Ph .D . thesis on file, Univ .<br />
Wash., Seattle .<br />
Sestak, Z ., J . Catsky, and P . G . Jarvis (eds .) .<br />
1971 . Plant photosynthetic production ,<br />
manual of methods . 818 p . The Hague : Dr .<br />
W. Junk N .V . Publishers .<br />
Slatyer, R . O . 1967 . Plant-water relationships .<br />
366 p . London : Acad . Press .<br />
Slavik, B . 1971. Determination of stomatal<br />
aperture . In Z . Sestak, J . Catsky, and P . G .<br />
Jarvis (eds .), Plant photosynthetic production,<br />
manual of methods, p . 556-565 . The<br />
Hague : Dr . W . Junk N .V . Publishers .<br />
Stalfelt, M . G . 1956 . Die stomatare Transpiration<br />
and die Physiologie der Spaltoffnungen<br />
. In W . Ruhland (ed .), Handb . Pflanzenphysiol.<br />
III : 351-426 .<br />
1960 . Die Frage der begrenzenden<br />
Faktoren . In W . Ruhland (ed .), Handb .<br />
Pflanzenphysiol . V 2 : 213-254 .<br />
Stephens, G . R . 1969 . Productivity of red<br />
pine. 1 . Foliage distribution in tree crowns<br />
and stand canopy . Agric . Meteorol . 6 :<br />
275-282 .<br />
Thompson, R . B., and L . Leyton . 1971 . Method<br />
for measuring the leaf surface area of<br />
complex shoots . Nature 229 : 572 .<br />
Tranquillini, W. 1969 . Photosynthese and<br />
Transpiration einiger Holzarten bei verschieden<br />
starkem Wind . Centralbl. fur da s<br />
Gesamte Forstw . (Wien) 86(1) : 35-48 .<br />
Ungerson, J ., and G . Scherdin . 1965 . Untersuchungen<br />
uber Photosynthese and<br />
Atmung unter nattirlichen Bedingungen<br />
wa`hrend des Winterhalbjahres bei Pin u s<br />
silvestris, Picea excelsa, and Juniperus cornmunis<br />
. Planta 67 : 136-167 .<br />
Waggoner, P . E ., and N . C . Turner . 1971 .<br />
Transpiration and its control by stomata i n<br />
a pine forest . Bull . Conn . Agric. Exp. Stn .<br />
726, 87 p .<br />
Waring, R . H ., and B . D . Cleary . 1967 . Plant<br />
moisture stress : evaluation by pressur e<br />
bomb . Science 155(3767) : 1248-1254 .<br />
, K. L . Reed, and W. H. Emmingham<br />
. 1972 . An environmental grid fo r<br />
classifying coniferous forest ecosystems . In<br />
Proceedings-research on coniferous fores t<br />
ecosystems-a symposium, p . 79-91, illus .<br />
Pac . Northwest <strong>Forest</strong> & Range Exp . Stn . ,<br />
Portland, Oreg .<br />
Woodman, James N . 1968 . The relationshi p<br />
of net photosynthesis to environment with -<br />
in the crown of a large Douglas-fir tree . 18 8<br />
p . Ph .D . thesis on file, Univ . Wash ., Seattle .<br />
1971 . Variation of net photo -<br />
synthesis within the crown of a large forest -<br />
grown conifer . Photosynthetica 5(1) :<br />
50-54 .<br />
Zelawski, W ., and J . Kucharska . 1967 . Winter<br />
depression of photosynthetic activity i n<br />
seedlings of Scots pine (Pinus silvestris, L .) .<br />
Photosynthetica 1(3-4) : 207-213 .<br />
Zimmermann, M . H ., and C . L. Brown . 1971 .<br />
Trees : structure and function . 336 p . New<br />
York : Springer-Verlag Inc .<br />
225
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium.<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Criteria for selecting an optimal model:<br />
terrestrial photosynthesis<br />
Kenneth L . Ree d<br />
College of <strong>Forest</strong> Resources<br />
University of Washingto n<br />
Seattle, Washington 98196<br />
an d<br />
Warren L . Web b<br />
School of <strong>Forest</strong>r y<br />
Oregon State University<br />
Corvallis, Oregon 9733 1<br />
A bs tract<br />
In theory, there exists an infinite number of models of a given system. These models differ in resolution,<br />
scope, descriptive and predictive power. Because the models described in the literature generally reflect th e<br />
personal perspectives and goals of the researchers who developed the models, it is helpful to be able to evaluat e<br />
the potential of a given model to provide the information needed in another research problem . Several criteria<br />
for selection of models or modeling approach are suggested in this paper. The use of the criteria is illustrated by<br />
discussion of several mathematical models of photosynthesis taken from the literature . The models discussed<br />
include a linear regression model, an energy budget model, and models based on theory of enzyme kinetics and<br />
gas exchange .<br />
Introduction<br />
A great many models are available that de -<br />
scribe photosynthesis, some of which will be<br />
discussed below . Because of the many models<br />
now available, we had hoped that we woul d<br />
not have to develop a new model-that w e<br />
need only choose or modify an existing model .<br />
Thus it was necessary to consider certain criteria<br />
by which to judge the applicability of a<br />
given model to the purposes of the IBP .<br />
Several of the criteria will be discussed be -<br />
low. This list is probably not complete, but i s<br />
suggested as a guide to model selection, modeling<br />
approach, or both . Because most scientists<br />
are modelers in a broad sense, this discussion<br />
is intended primarily for those scientists<br />
who are least familiar with formal aspects<br />
of modeling .<br />
Criteria for Model Selectio n<br />
Because plant growth and presumably community<br />
composition are greatly influenced b y<br />
photosynthetic capacity, that phenomeno n<br />
has been the object of a great deal of study .<br />
Photosynthesis is only one component of the<br />
biochemical system resulting in plant growth .<br />
Failure to consider other factors in growth, a s<br />
well as the fact that photosynthesis can be<br />
uncoupled from growth, results in the general<br />
failure of attempts to predict growth from<br />
photosynthesis. However, a model of photosynthesis<br />
is an important component of a<br />
growth model and because the process o f<br />
photosynthesis is a physical-chemical system ,<br />
attempts to model photosynthesis should b e<br />
consistent with some basic tenets of systems<br />
theory as well as physical reality .<br />
227
Systems<br />
A system, as defined by Klir (1969), is imposed<br />
upon an object-a segment of nature<br />
(the earth, a community, a tree, an automobile,<br />
a computer)-by the observer from a distinct<br />
point of view. Everything that does not<br />
belong to the object is the environment . The<br />
boundary between the object and its environment<br />
cannot be clearly defined ; thus th e<br />
delimitation of the object is somewhat arbitrary<br />
and reflects the personal perspectives o f<br />
the modeler . Because we usually cannot stud y<br />
an object in its entirety (because of its complexity),<br />
we observe or measure values of certain<br />
quantities . The choice of quantities to<br />
measure depends on what we consider to b e<br />
of interest or important to the given purpos e<br />
(Klir 1969) .<br />
Most scientists are familiar with the concept<br />
of a system, especially as it is applied i n<br />
thermodynamics. For example, the laws of<br />
thermodynamics were derived by studyin g<br />
idealized closed systems in equilibrium . In<br />
dealing with such closed systems it is possible<br />
to study independent state variables such as<br />
pressure, temperature, and volume, which de -<br />
fine the state of the system. A closed thermodynamic<br />
system can exchange heat and work<br />
but not matter with its environment (Daniels<br />
and Alberty 1967) .<br />
As Ludvig von Bertalanffy (1969) pointe d<br />
out, biological systems are open system s<br />
whose structure is maintained by energy, in -<br />
formation, and matter flow through the systems.<br />
The behavior of the system is the resul t<br />
of the interactions of the elements of th e<br />
system and the flow through the system . Because<br />
the thermodynamic system is closed<br />
and idealized, and because the state variable s<br />
are independent (i .e., one can be varied with -<br />
out affecting another), it is convenient and<br />
correct to describe the system in terms o f<br />
total differentials; for example, the relation<br />
of internal free energy, E, of a system to<br />
temperature and volume, T and V, can be expressed<br />
(Daniels and Alberty 1967) :<br />
E = f(T, V)<br />
dE _<br />
(3T<br />
) V dT + () T dv (1)<br />
Equation 1 implies that the variables E, T,<br />
and V are independent ; one can be varied<br />
while the others are held constant, but mor e<br />
importantly, equation 1 implies summativity<br />
in the system where the behavior of a summa -<br />
tive system is the physical sum of the behavior<br />
of the parts . Because this approach is useful<br />
in thermodynamics and other special<br />
areas, biologists often attempt to explai n<br />
observed phenomena by assuming that the<br />
elements of all systems are independent (vo n<br />
Bertalanffy 1969) . We in plant physiology<br />
have accepted as a standard procedure th e<br />
isolation of a plant in a growth chamber, an d<br />
the study of the response of the plant to on e<br />
factor while holding the others constant . This<br />
approach is epitomized by Cleary (1970) who<br />
derived the following model of photosynthesis :<br />
the n<br />
P = f(M,T,L,N,Pr)<br />
dP= (3P) dM y {('r,) dT<br />
am T,L,N P dT M .L.N.P<br />
+ .<br />
. + dpr~ dP r<br />
1, 7'. L,N<br />
(2 )<br />
where P = photosynthesis, M,T,L,N, and Pr<br />
are moisture, temperature, light, nutrition an d<br />
preconditioning effect, respectively . This<br />
model assumes a summative system analogou s<br />
to a closed thermodynamic system .<br />
This assumption is not totally valid in a<br />
biological system like photosynthesis . Light ,<br />
for example, has an effect not only on the<br />
photochemical reactions within the leaf, but<br />
also is converted to heat, which influences<br />
leaf temperature. Likewise, leaf temperature<br />
is affected by transpiration rates, which is in<br />
turn affected by temperature, moisture status<br />
of the leaf and air, and so on, but equation 2<br />
does not account for these interactions. While<br />
this model is inadequate in that respect ,<br />
Cleary (1970) does recognize that photo -<br />
synthesis is not a simple light-and-temperatur e<br />
related phenomenon but represents a complex<br />
interaction of diverse factors, all of whic h<br />
should be taken into account in order to full y<br />
understand the process . Some of the factor s<br />
listed by Cleary (1970) probably are independent,<br />
namely, Pr and N.<br />
228
Von Bertalanffy (1969) calls nonsummative<br />
systems Gestalten ; for example, the nonadditivity<br />
of mixing equal volumes of concentrated<br />
sulfuric acid and water. Von Bertalanffy<br />
provides another simple example where he<br />
points out that the voltage of three isolated<br />
conductors would be different from that i f<br />
they were interconnected . Biological quantities<br />
often act very much like the charge i n<br />
von Bertalanffy's example in that their values<br />
in concert are different from their isolated<br />
values . Thus, it is essential for a biological re -<br />
searcher to understand the distinction between<br />
summative systems and Gestalten . It is<br />
advisable to consider a biological system to b e<br />
a Gestalt unless it can be proved otherwise .<br />
We do not believe that the concepts of systems<br />
can be overemphasized . It is not necessary<br />
for each researcher to be adept at formulating<br />
systems models, but he should be awar e<br />
that few things in a biological system operat e<br />
independently, and that it is difficult if no t<br />
impossible to understand biological phenomena<br />
if we simply take the one factor-on e<br />
response approach. As a result, in modelin g<br />
biological systems, the single most importan t<br />
concept is that the model must be a syste m<br />
model, consistent with the concepts of<br />
systems theory .<br />
Theoretical Validit y<br />
We view a model as a tool to aid in under -<br />
standing and prediction . Because there are, i n<br />
theory at least, an infinite number of model s<br />
that can apply to a given system, we must<br />
select that model which provides the greatest<br />
understanding and predictive power withi n<br />
certain limitations . If our system of interest<br />
can best be explained by physical principles ,<br />
then the model should have physical validity ,<br />
but there are systems which are not explain -<br />
able from the physical paradigm, for example ,<br />
animal behavior . In other cases, the physica l<br />
theory is inadequate and the approach may b e<br />
fruitless .<br />
Given a physical-chemical system, like<br />
photosynthesis, a physically valid model is usu -<br />
ally a good choice . As an almost trivial example,<br />
photosynthesis, P, has been expressed b y<br />
Chartier (1966) as a function of light :<br />
P 1 bL (3 )<br />
where a/b is P at light saturation, and a is the<br />
slope of the curve (fig . 1) at zero light since<br />
a = dP/dL(1 + bL) . Lommen and coworkers<br />
(1971) express the same phenomenon as :<br />
PmL<br />
P m<br />
(L) = 1 + K L /L<br />
where PmL is photosynthesis at light and C O 2<br />
saturation and KL is that light intensity at<br />
which Pm(L) = 1/2 PmL (fig. 2) .<br />
a/s<br />
P<br />
Figure 1 . Photosynthesis as a function of light . From<br />
Chartier (1966) A = slope of line O,X . Descriptio n<br />
in text .<br />
PM (L)<br />
PML<br />
------------------ -<br />
K<br />
(4)<br />
Figure 2 . Photosynthesis as a function of light . Fro m<br />
Lommen et al.(1971) . Description in text .<br />
L<br />
L<br />
229
It is obvious that in essence equation 4 i s<br />
identical to equation 3, where PmL = a/b an d<br />
K = 1/b . Both models describe the light dependence<br />
of photosynthesis equally well ; on e<br />
model is not more complex than the other .<br />
Yet, we would choose equation 4 because th e<br />
parameters have more physical meaning . Th e<br />
curve could also be described by :<br />
P=00 + a 1L+ 32 L 2 + 03 L3 . . . (5)<br />
which has even less appeal because it is nearl y<br />
impossible to determine the physical meanin g<br />
of the parameters ((3 i).<br />
It could be argued that equation 4 is littl e<br />
more valid than equation 3. Equation 4 is<br />
derived from the Michaelis-Menton equatio n<br />
that describes the rate of a single enzymati c<br />
reaction as a function of a substrate concentration<br />
. Photosynthesis is not a true Michaelis-<br />
Menton case because it is an integration o f<br />
photochemistry and a chain of enzymati c<br />
reactions . The reductionist might argue that<br />
we should model photosynthesis as a functio n<br />
of the photochemical and the enzymatic reaction<br />
rates . Further, it is obvious that temperature,<br />
substrate availability, and several othe r<br />
factors are important in photosynthesis. Also ,<br />
since equation 4 considers only light an d<br />
(indirectly) CO 2 effects, it falls short of ou r<br />
first criterion, that the model be a system<br />
model insofar as possible. These points brin g<br />
up our third criterion : resolution level .<br />
Resolution<br />
According to Klir (1969) every quantity w e<br />
observe must be determined in space . That is ,<br />
CO 2 concentration, incident radiant energy ,<br />
and temperature may be specified at som e<br />
point in space . This specification may be irrelevent<br />
for some studies (e .g., the location of<br />
a laboratory may be trivial with respect to th e<br />
study) but when concerned with a weathe r<br />
forecast, it would be important to identif y<br />
the spot on earth where temperature is measured.<br />
We may also specify the interval and<br />
accuracy of our measurements, giving the<br />
space-time resolution level (Klir 1969) .<br />
It may be convenient to think of the spatial<br />
resolution level as the hierarchical level of<br />
resolution (von Bertalanffy 1969) . Biological<br />
systems can be placed in hierarchies corresponding<br />
with levels of organization (table 1) .<br />
0 . ?mo<br />
Table 1 .-Levels of organization<br />
1. Subatomi c<br />
2. Atomi c<br />
3. Molecular<br />
4. Subcellular<br />
5. Cellular<br />
6. Organ or tissue<br />
Thus a system can be thought of as a component<br />
in a larger system, and composed of sub -<br />
systems (von Bertalanffy 1969) . Each level of<br />
organization seems to have certain properties<br />
unique to that level, making prediction o f<br />
system behavior from the viewpoint of th e<br />
lower systems somewhat hazardous . This concept<br />
is implicit in the idea of nonsummativit y<br />
of systems. The reductionist might argu e<br />
against this view, but the limits of reductionism<br />
are obvious . It is impossible to predict<br />
all the behavior of a tree from the molecular<br />
level . If we hope to discover general ecosystem<br />
principles comparable to the fundamental<br />
principles of physics, probably we wil l<br />
have to emphasize study from the ecosyste m<br />
level. The ideal gas law, for example, was<br />
derived from observations of the behavior o f<br />
10 23 particles acting in concert. In ecosyste m<br />
study, we are among the particles; a holistic<br />
view is needed .<br />
There are three levels of resolution under<br />
consideration for the photosynthesis model :<br />
the leaf, tree, and stand levels . Each level will<br />
require a different model and approach ; we<br />
cannot extrapolate the leaf level model to a<br />
tree by multiplying the results by the numbe r<br />
of leaves in the crown . The temporal resolution<br />
of the models will be somewhat flexibl e<br />
at the leaf level, but will probably be on a<br />
daily basis for the stand model .<br />
Practical Considerations<br />
7. Organism<br />
8. Community<br />
9. Global<br />
10. Solar Syste m<br />
11. Galactic<br />
12. Universe<br />
13. ? o<br />
There are several practical consideration s<br />
230
which may be of importance in model selection<br />
or approach . Some nonlinear systems of<br />
differential equations are extremely difficult<br />
to solve and their solution may consume a<br />
great deal of computer time . Parameter estimation<br />
is often a significant problem in man y<br />
models. Some models require highly precis e<br />
measurement of input variables, reducin g<br />
their practical applications, but their theoretical<br />
contributions may be important . On the<br />
other hand, we sometimes settle for use of a<br />
linear regression model when the system is<br />
poorly understood and it is much easier t o<br />
measure the variables than to determine their<br />
exact interrelations . Such models are useful in<br />
science, but have some built-in dangers, e .g . ,<br />
the hazard of extrapolation of linear regression<br />
models .<br />
One danger of reliance upon regressio n<br />
models is that the confidence in the model i s<br />
greatest at the mean and diminishes at th e<br />
extremes. In fact, it is possible to fit a curvilinear<br />
function to data of a given range, only<br />
to have the model become totally inadequate<br />
at the extremes .<br />
For example, net photosynthesis as a function<br />
of temperature can be described as a<br />
symmetrical quadratic (Pisek and Winkle r<br />
1958, Webb 1972) (fig. 3) .<br />
values. Thus equation 6 is valid only in th e<br />
range of temperature within which the<br />
parameters were estimated .<br />
The failure of a model to predict syste m<br />
behavior at extremes is not necessarily fatal ;<br />
such models are common in physics, e .g., the<br />
ideal gas law and Newtonian physics . It i s<br />
necessary to understand the limitations of<br />
one 's models to know when the system deviates<br />
from the model .<br />
In choosing a model, it is important t o<br />
understand the assumptions and limitations of<br />
the model . For example, it is questionable to<br />
describe a biological system with a model tha t<br />
assumes a closed reversible system . Th e<br />
assumptions implicit in the model should be<br />
compatible with present knowledge of th e<br />
system of interest .<br />
This is not to say that models of different<br />
systems cannot be used to model another<br />
system. The idea of isomorphism of system s<br />
models is central to general systems theory<br />
(von Bertalanffy 1969) . Thus thermodynami c<br />
models, for example, may be of great utility<br />
in certain biological systems models . It re -<br />
mains for the researcher to be sure that the<br />
systems are isomorphic so that such model s<br />
are applicable .<br />
Pn = X30 + R1 T - 32 T2 ( 6)<br />
But extrapolation of the curve in either direction<br />
will lead to progressively more negativ e<br />
G(T)<br />
Examination of<br />
Some Models<br />
of Photosynthesis<br />
The discussion above dealt with criteria fo r<br />
selection of models . It would be useful to discuss<br />
some models described in the literature .<br />
Leaf Environment Mode l<br />
a<br />
Figure 3 . Net photosynthesis, G(T), as a quadrati c<br />
function of temperature .<br />
T<br />
Botkin (1969) simulated photosynthesis in<br />
an open oak-pine forest near Brookhave n<br />
National Laboratory . He developed a linea r<br />
model of net photosynthesis :<br />
Pn=c 0 + 01 T+ (3 2 ln S<br />
+ Q3 (ln s) 2 + Q4 T2 + (3 5 T 1n S (7)<br />
231
where T = leaf temperature, ° K<br />
S = solar radiation, gcal cm-2 min<br />
Pn = net photosynthesis rate ,<br />
mg CO 2 (g dry wt)-1 hr 1<br />
(3i = parameters to be estimate d<br />
Equation 7 was derived from equation 8 and<br />
equation 9 :<br />
P(L)=a+b 1nS (8)<br />
which had been used to fit photosynthesis dat a<br />
from several herbaceous species (Blackman an d<br />
Rutter 1946, Blackman and Wilson 1951) .<br />
Equation 8 was coupled with equation 9 suggested<br />
by data of Pisek and Winkler (1958) ,<br />
Krueger and Ferrell (1965), and others :<br />
G(T) = a + bT + cT2 (9 )<br />
Data from two species of oak were obtained<br />
from infrared gas analysis and wer e<br />
used to estimate the parameters of equation 7<br />
by stepwise multiple regression analysis . Som e<br />
of the terms of equation 7 were nonsignificant,<br />
and were thus discarded . The final<br />
model was :<br />
Pn =Qo +(3 1 T+(3 2 In S+(3 5 T In S (10 )<br />
Having estimated the parameters of equation<br />
10, the model was used to predict photo -<br />
synthesis of oak in the field . Their model gav e<br />
fair to good agreement with subsequentl y<br />
measured net photosynthesis .<br />
In terms of the criteria discussed above ,<br />
equation 10 is generally inadequate . It doe s<br />
allow for interaction between two variables but<br />
fails to take into consideration other factor s<br />
that affect photosynthetic rate (stomatal behavior,<br />
micrometeorological conditions, plan t<br />
nutrition) . The model does satisfy the requirement<br />
that the Pn model be solved as a functio n<br />
of systems variables, that is, Pn = f [S, T] .<br />
In terms of the other criteria, the model fall s<br />
short of having a great deal of theoretica l<br />
validity in that the function is one of convenience<br />
rather than having general physicalchemical<br />
meaning . It is unnecessary to discuss<br />
in detail Botkin's model with respect to the<br />
other criteria . Like most photosynthesis models,<br />
it is specified at the leaf level, where th e<br />
inputs to the leaf are measured, and the<br />
relations between the leaf subsystems are<br />
inferred .<br />
While his model has many failings, it doe s<br />
have one virtue. If one were interested in<br />
comparing Pn = f[T,L] in two species under<br />
identical conditions, this model may be adequate,<br />
given that some other factor, e .g . ,<br />
stomatal resistance, is not limiting . The fact<br />
that the parameters of the model were estimated<br />
by least-squares allows the use o f<br />
statistical tests useful in comparing such data .<br />
Energy Budget Mode l<br />
Idso and Baker (1968) based their model of<br />
photosynthesis and their earlier model (Ids o<br />
and Baker 1967) on that of Gates (1965 )<br />
which is an energy budget model where precis e<br />
measurement of incoming radiant energy is<br />
equated with outgoing energy . Thus, at equilibrium,<br />
the amount of energy leaving a leaf i s<br />
equal to that coming in . Gates ' (1965) leaf<br />
energy budget model is :<br />
where<br />
(1 +r) (S + s) (<strong>Rg</strong>' +R a)<br />
as 2 +a t 2 (11 )<br />
-e taTZ ± C±LE= 0<br />
a s = mean total absorbance of plant to<br />
sunlight and skyligh t<br />
r = reflectance of underlying ground<br />
or plane surface to sunlight and<br />
skylight, S and s<br />
at = absorbance of plant to thermal<br />
radiation, <strong>Rg</strong> and Ra<br />
e t = emissivity of plant to thermal<br />
radiatio n<br />
Tl = leaf temperature ° K<br />
C = energy gained or lost by convection<br />
cal cm-2 min- 1<br />
L = latent heat of evaporation ca l<br />
cm-2 miri- l<br />
E = transpiration rate of leaf gm cal - 2<br />
min- 1<br />
S, s, <strong>Rg</strong>, Ra = various short and lon g<br />
wave radiation inputs ca l<br />
cm-2 min 1<br />
232
The first three terms of equation 11 represent<br />
the radiant energy available to the plant .<br />
By elaborating equation 11 and solving for Tl ,<br />
Gates was able to predict leaf temperature as<br />
a function of the incoming energy less th e<br />
outgoing energy . From data of other worker s<br />
he developed a family of curves for photo -<br />
synthesis with respect to temperature and radiant<br />
energy . Given these curves and by calculating<br />
Tl, Gates predicted photosynthesis of<br />
several species .<br />
Idso and Baker (1967) constructed a similar<br />
family of curves for sorghum. In a subsequent<br />
paper (Idso and Baker 1968), they used<br />
these curves to predict Pn on four different<br />
types of days based on input from their<br />
energy budget calculations . They did not<br />
measure Pn directly, so there was no direct<br />
verification of the models .<br />
In terms of our suggested criteria fo r<br />
analysis of models, it is obvious that th e<br />
energy budget model is consistent with th e<br />
systems approach . However, the relation of Tl<br />
and absorbed energy to Pn is empirical an d<br />
incomplete, and constitutes the weak point o f<br />
this model . Thus, from a standpoint o f<br />
theoretical validity, the Pn model suggeste d<br />
by Idso and Baker (1967, 1968) suffers fro m<br />
drawbacks identical to those of Botki n<br />
(1969). Should a more satisfactory model o f<br />
Pn as a function of light and temperatur e<br />
become available, however, it can be incorporated<br />
into the leaf energy budget model . The<br />
energy budget model itself is sound and has<br />
great promise . It is probably sufficiently<br />
general to apply to any plant, and the variou s<br />
terms can be refined where more specifi c<br />
component models are needed .<br />
Unfortunately, from a practical standpoint ,<br />
the input data necessary for such a model ar e<br />
very difficult to obtain, requiring a great deal<br />
of sensitive instrumentation. This limitatio n<br />
would preclude the applicability of the mode l<br />
to study of some ecosystems where suc h<br />
measurements would be most difficult o r<br />
impossible . Further, the resolution of th e<br />
model is great, and such variables as inciden t<br />
solar angle and leaf geometry are important .<br />
Extrapolation of this model to a tree or to a<br />
stand would require prodigious volumes o f<br />
input data and highly sophisticated subsystem<br />
models .<br />
In summary, the high-resolution energ y<br />
budget approach, while having considerabl e<br />
appeal from the systems and theoretica l<br />
standpoint, is probably limited in its utility t o<br />
theoretical studies and studies of simple r<br />
systems . The basic approach could be modified<br />
by altering the resolution level of the<br />
components and by perhaps adding som e<br />
stochastic models . In this way, the energy<br />
budget approach could be used in modeling a t<br />
a lower level of resolution . Such a model ,<br />
being simpler, could then be used at the tre e<br />
and stand levels of organization .<br />
While the work of Gates (1965) and hi s<br />
colleagues has contributed greatly to th e<br />
understanding of the energetics of the leaf, it<br />
still remained to develop a model of the<br />
process of photosynthesis itself that could<br />
satisfy our second criterion, that of theoretical<br />
validity . This problem was attacked by<br />
Brown (1969) .<br />
Process Models<br />
Brown assumed that if Pn is a first-orde r<br />
reaction, then equation 12 would hold :<br />
where P = rate of CO 2<br />
leaf area<br />
P = KI[CO 2 ]g (12 )<br />
exchange per uni t<br />
K = capacity of acceptor site in th e<br />
leaf to fix CO 2 at the site of<br />
photosynthesis<br />
I = incident radiatio n<br />
[C0 2]g = concentration of CO 2 at the fixation<br />
site<br />
Brown also assumed that I follows Beer' s<br />
law within the leaf ,<br />
x = Ie" ax (13 )<br />
where I is incident radiation at the leaf<br />
surface, a is the extinction coefficient, x is<br />
distance from the leaf surface, and Ix is<br />
radiation at x . Brown incorporated equation<br />
12 into Gaastra's (1959) derivation from<br />
Fick 's law of diffusion representing steadystate<br />
diffusion of CO 2 from the air to the<br />
leaf :<br />
233
where<br />
giving<br />
P = C a Cc<br />
Er<br />
(14 )<br />
Ca = concentration of atmospheri c<br />
CO 2 g cm- 3<br />
Cc = concentration of CO 2 at the<br />
chloroplast g cm 3<br />
Er = resistance to gas diffusion<br />
sec cm- 1<br />
D[CO 2] a<br />
P= 1 + D/KI<br />
where D is the integral exchange coefficien t<br />
D= 1 = 1<br />
ra +rs +rm E r<br />
where ra is boundary layer resistance, rs is<br />
stomatal resistance, and rm is mesophyll<br />
resistance to CO 2 diffusion in sec cm-2 .<br />
Equation 15 is gross photosynthesis, not Pn ,<br />
and thus equation 15 should be corrected for<br />
respiration :<br />
Pn = K[CO 2 /al - R<br />
(16)<br />
I + K1/D<br />
where R is respiration .<br />
These models assume that resistance t o<br />
transfer of CO 2 from respiration site to the<br />
photosynthesis site is negligible . The variable<br />
nature of rs must also be considered, requirin g<br />
an additional model of stomatal behavior .<br />
Brown (1969) notes that the complexity of<br />
equation 16 becomes great when other components<br />
are added, and states that it is<br />
necessary to solve equation 16 by arriving at<br />
the functional relationships of the components<br />
by independent means and substituting<br />
them into the general model .<br />
If the components are truly independent ,<br />
such a tactic is valid . If not, error is introduced<br />
by failing to consider changes in th e<br />
values of the parameters due to interaction, a<br />
violation of our systems criterion .<br />
Lommen and coworkers (1971) took an<br />
approach similar to that of Brown (1969) .<br />
They began with Gaastra 's (1959) derivatio n<br />
from Fick's law of diffusion now familiar to<br />
us. The biochemical relations are described b y<br />
a Michaelis-Menton type equation that de -<br />
scribes the rate of a single enzymatic reaction .<br />
Their model for photosynthesis as a function<br />
(15)<br />
of chloroplast concentration of CO 2 is :<br />
Pm<br />
P 1 + K/Cc<br />
where P = photosynthesis g cm-2 sec- 1<br />
Pm = photosynthesis at saturating CO 2<br />
g cm-2 sec- s<br />
K = concentration of CO 2 at the<br />
chloroplast when P = 1/*Pm<br />
Cc = concentration of CO 2 at the<br />
chloroplast g cm- 3<br />
Equation 14 is solved for Cc and substitute d<br />
into equation 17 giving photosynthesis as a<br />
function of atmospheric CO 2 concentratio n<br />
and stomatal resistance :<br />
(Ca + K + E rPm)<br />
P=<br />
2Er<br />
(18)<br />
- [(Ca + K + ErPm)2 - 4CaErPm] lie<br />
21 r<br />
They also derived a similar though mor e<br />
complex model giving photosynthesis as a<br />
function of Ca, K, Pm, W, and two series of<br />
resistances, S 1 , S 2 ; W is respiration .<br />
They also derived submodels of photosynthesis<br />
as a function of light and temperature ,<br />
Pm(L,T) =<br />
PmLT G(T)<br />
1 + KL/L<br />
(17 )<br />
(19 )<br />
similar to equation 4 but incorporating a term<br />
G(T) representing the temperature dependence<br />
of photosynthesis . The authors implie d<br />
that equation 19 could be incorporated int o<br />
equation 18 and their other model, but the y<br />
did not do so, and dimensional analysis o f<br />
equation 18 with PmLT and KL substituted<br />
for Pm and K, shows that such a substitutio n<br />
is physically unrealistic. Hence the model o f<br />
Lomrnen et al . (1971) is inadequate for<br />
predicting photosynthesis as a function o f<br />
light and temperature as well as CO 2 concentration<br />
and stomatal resistance .<br />
Chartier (1966, 1969, 1970) also developed<br />
a complex model of net assimilation derive d<br />
along the lines of that by Lommen et al .<br />
(1971) . Beginning with the fundamental for m<br />
(Chartier 1970) :<br />
234
P = F+ R<br />
where F = net assimilation rate<br />
per unit leaf area<br />
R = respiration rate<br />
and by analogy to Gaastra's (1959) Fick's la w<br />
function, he derived :<br />
C-F(ra +rs +rm)-nRrm<br />
F + R = 1<br />
aE C-F(rQ +rs +rm)-nRrm +rx<br />
(20)<br />
The only terms unfamiliar to us are rx, n, aE,<br />
and R . Here R is respiration in light, and n is<br />
the fraction of respiratory flux that is mixe d<br />
in the intercellular spaces (n < 1) . The term<br />
aE represents conversion of light to photosynthate<br />
where E is incident light energy, an d<br />
a is the efficiency of light energy conversion .<br />
The term rx represents resistance to carboxyla -<br />
tion, a parameter which includes biochemical<br />
restraints caused by mineral nutrition, age o f<br />
the leaf, etc .<br />
Chartier's (1970) model differs from tha t<br />
of Lommen et al. (1971) in that the effect of<br />
light is incorporated into the model . Th e<br />
effect of temperature must be included, perhaps<br />
by a multiplicative term (Lommen et al .<br />
1971, Webb 1972) . Chartier's model gives a<br />
quadratic solution for F, as in Lommen et al ,<br />
but many of the terms in both models ar e<br />
difficult if not impossible to measure in a<br />
field study . Further, respiration is represente d<br />
by a single term ; an oversimplification requiring<br />
further work .<br />
Conclusions<br />
In order to be consistent with the systems<br />
viewpoint, photosynthesis must be treated as<br />
a Gestalt, or nonsummative system. The<br />
models described above violate this criterion<br />
to some extent, most often by failing to<br />
incorporate an important factor in the model .<br />
We had hoped to be able to use one of the<br />
models by Lommen et al. (1971) or by<br />
Chartier (1970) as a tool in our field research ,<br />
but two considerations prohibit this : (1) both<br />
models have unmeasurable (in the field )<br />
terms, (2) neither model is complete, i .e . ,<br />
neither expresses photosynthesis as a function<br />
of all the known important factors .<br />
Consequently, it will be necessary to develop<br />
a model of photosynthesis as a function<br />
of light, temperature, leaf resistance and<br />
ambient CO 2 concentration with some simplifications<br />
from the above models which will<br />
increase the utility of the models. The<br />
parameters in this model will be estimate d<br />
from data after the manner of Webb (1972 )<br />
by nonlinear least-squares . The final model<br />
will have much the same utility as a regressio n<br />
model, but will not be linear and th e<br />
parameters where possible will have physical<br />
meaning. Thus, the models will be develope d<br />
with certain specific goals in mind, necessitating<br />
development of different models for th e<br />
tree and stand levels of resolution .<br />
A cknowledgments<br />
The work reported in this paper was<br />
supported by National Science Foundatio n<br />
Grant No. GB-20963 to the Coniferous Fores t<br />
Biome, U .S . Analysis of Ecosystems, International<br />
Biological Program . This is Contributio n<br />
No. 38 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome, IBP .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Blackman, G . E ., and A. J. Rutter. 1946 .<br />
Physiological and ecological studies in th e<br />
analysis of plant environment . I. The light<br />
factor and the distribution of the bluebel l<br />
(Scilla non-scripta) in woodland communities.<br />
Ann. Bot., N.S. 10: 361-390 .<br />
and G . L. Wilson . 1951. Physiological<br />
and ecological studies in the analysi s<br />
of plant environment . VI. The constancy<br />
for different species of a logarithmic relationship<br />
between the net assimilation rat e<br />
and light intensity and its ecological significance.<br />
Ann . Bot., N.S. 15: 63-94 .<br />
Botkin, D . R. 1969 . Prediction of net photo -<br />
synthesis of trees from light intensity and<br />
temperature. Ecology 50: 854-858 .<br />
Brown, K . W. 1969 . A model of the photosyn -<br />
thesizing leaf . Physiol . Plant 22 : 620-637 .<br />
Chartier, P. 1966. Etude theorique de 1 'assimi -<br />
lation brute de la feuille . Ann . Physiol. veg .<br />
8: 167-196 .<br />
235
1969. Assimilation nette d'un e<br />
culture couvrante_ II. La reponse de l'unite<br />
de surface de feuille . Ann. Physiol. Veg.<br />
11 : 221-263 .<br />
1970. A model of CO 2 assimilation<br />
in the leaf . In Prediction and measurement<br />
of photosynthetic productivity, 63 2<br />
p . Wageningen, The Netherlands : Centre<br />
for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation<br />
.<br />
Cleary, B . D. 1970. The effect of plant<br />
moisture stress on physiology and establishment<br />
of planted Douglas-fir ponderosa pin e<br />
seedlings. 85 p. Ph .D. thesis on file, Oreg.<br />
State Univ., Corvallis .<br />
Daniels, F ., and R . A. Alberty . 1967 . Physical<br />
chemistry . Ed . 3, 767 p. New York : Wiley .<br />
Gaastra, P. 1959. Photosynthesis of cro p<br />
plants as influenced by light, C0 2 , temperature,<br />
and stomatal diffusion resistance .<br />
Med. Landb . Hogesch . Wageningen, Th e<br />
Netherlands 59 : 1-68 .<br />
Gates, D. M . 1965. Energy, plants, an d<br />
ecology . Ecology 46 : 1-13 .<br />
Idso, S . B ., and D. G. Baker . 1967. Metho d<br />
for calculating the photosynthetic respons e<br />
of a crop to light intensity and lea f<br />
temperature by an energy flow analysis o f<br />
the meteorological parameters . Agron. J .<br />
59 : 13-21 .<br />
and D . G . Baker. 1968. The<br />
naturally varying energy environment and<br />
its effects on photosynthesis . Ecology 49 :<br />
311-316 .<br />
Klir, G. J. 1969. An approach to general<br />
systems theory . 323 p . New York: Van<br />
Nostrand-Reinhold Co .<br />
Krueger, K. W., and W . K . Ferrell. 1965 .<br />
Comparative photosynthetic and respiratory<br />
responses to temperature and light by<br />
Pseudotsuga menziesii var . menziesii and<br />
var . glauca seedlings . Ecology 46 : 794-801 .<br />
Lommen, P. W ., C. R . Schwintzer, C. S .<br />
Yocum, and D . M. Gates . 1971 . A model<br />
describing photosynthesis in terms of gas<br />
diffusion and enzyme kinetics. Planta 98 :<br />
195-220 .<br />
Pisek, A., and E . Winkler . 1958 . Assimilationsvermogen<br />
and Respiration der Ficht e<br />
(Picea excelsa Link) in verschiedene r<br />
Hohenlage and der Zirbe (Pinus cembra L .)<br />
and der alpinen Waltlgranze. Planta 51 :<br />
518-543 .<br />
von Bertalanffy, L . 1969 . General syste m<br />
theory . 289 p. New York: Geo. Braziller .<br />
Webb, W. L. 1972. A model of light and temperature<br />
controlled net photosyntheti c<br />
rates for terrestrial plants . In Jerry F .<br />
Franklin, L. J. Dempster, and Richard H.<br />
Waring (eds.), Proceedings-research o n<br />
coniferous forest ecosystems-a symposium,<br />
p. 237-242, illus. Pac. Northwest<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> & Range Exp . Stn ., Portland, Oreg.<br />
236
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, WashingtonMarch 23-24, 197 2<br />
A model of light and temperature<br />
controlled net photosynthetic rates<br />
for terrestrial plants<br />
Warren L . Web b<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Research Laboratory<br />
School of <strong>Forest</strong>r y<br />
Oregon State University<br />
Corvallis, Orego n<br />
Abstract<br />
Steady-state relative net CO2 exchange was modeled in terms of a temperature-dependent respiration function<br />
and light- and temperature-dependent photosynthesis function. The parameters of the model were<br />
evaluated using the laboratory CO 2 exchange data of a group of 40 red alder seedlings (Alnus rubra Bong.). Th e<br />
model is continuous and well-behaved in the temperature region of 0-50°C for light energy between 0 .0 and 1 . 0<br />
ly/min total short-wave radiation.<br />
Introduction<br />
Consumer populations depend upon the<br />
chemical energy that is converted from sola r<br />
energy by plants in the ecosystem . The rate of<br />
conversion, or net photosynthesis, is in tur n<br />
dependent upon the genetic information avail -<br />
able to each plant and its immediate environment.<br />
Many factors influence net photosynthesis<br />
but, as Schulze (1970) found from hi s<br />
work in a beech stand, when water stress is<br />
not appreciable, the radiation and temperature<br />
regimes of the plant largely regulate net<br />
photosynthesis . This paper presents an empirical<br />
model of steady-state net CO 2 exchange i n<br />
terms of a light (L) and temperature (T) con -<br />
trolled gross photosynthesis function (Ps) an d<br />
a temperature-controlled dark respiration (Rs )<br />
function .<br />
Net CO 2 flux entering the leaf, or ne t<br />
photosynthesis (Psn), is conceptualized as th e<br />
difference between carbon fixed in the photo -<br />
synthetic process and that lost during respiration,<br />
Psn = Ps - Rs (Larcher 1969) . The two<br />
terms, net photosynthesis and net CO2 exchange,<br />
are used synonymously in this paper .<br />
Although the former is less general in that it<br />
usually applies only to CO 2 exchanges occurring<br />
in the light, it is more mechanically<br />
viable .<br />
Fluxes of CO 2 are easily measured and<br />
many investigators have reported on the ne t<br />
photosynthetic response of plants to temperature<br />
and light (Heath 1969, Rabinowitc h<br />
1969, Milner and Hiesey 1969) . Figure 1 illustrates<br />
the net photosynthetic response of<br />
small plants or individual leaves to increasin g<br />
temperature or light . The linear portion of the<br />
light curve represents the rate of the photo -<br />
chemical reaction at the chloroplast and is<br />
largely invariant among species (Rabinowitc h<br />
1969) . This linear slope can be extrapolated<br />
through zero CO2 flux, called the light compensation<br />
point, and the negative absciss a<br />
intercept interpreted as dark respiration<br />
(Chartier 1969) . At high light levels, photo -<br />
synthesis becomes saturated and its rate i s<br />
dependent upon factors such as temperatur e<br />
237
Figure 2. Effect of temperature on dark respiration .<br />
Figure 1 . Leaf CO2 exchange as related to light an d<br />
temperature .<br />
and water potential that influence the carbon -<br />
fixing enzymatic reactions .<br />
Net photosynthetic response to temperature,<br />
also shown in figure 1, is generally a<br />
symmetrical form (Pisek et al . 1969, Moone y<br />
and Harrison 1969). Pisek's data have show n<br />
that the slope of the curve and the point of<br />
maximum shifts depending upon species an d<br />
season but the response remains symmetrical .<br />
The responses to light and temperatur e<br />
seem well-defined. A model using light an d<br />
temperature as independent variables shoul d<br />
conserve the known responses to each as wel l<br />
as include any interaction . To be useful, th e<br />
model should also predict CO 2 losses that<br />
occur below the light-compensation point a s<br />
well as respiration losses occurring durin g<br />
darkness . This requires that a respiratio n<br />
response be explicitly introduced into th e<br />
model.<br />
Figure 2 represents a generalized dark respiration<br />
response to temperature for steady -<br />
state conditions. The response at low an d<br />
intermediate temperatures is exponential i n<br />
keeping with the van 't Hoff Q 1 o rule for<br />
chemical reactions (Forward 1960). Abov e<br />
some high temperature, a decline resultin g<br />
from enzyme denaturation occurs which<br />
tends to become irreversible as the time o f<br />
exposure to high temperature increases (For -<br />
ward 1960, Longridge 1963) .<br />
Net CO 2 uptake, or net photosynthesis ,<br />
can now be expressed in terms of temperature-controlled<br />
respiration and light- an d<br />
temperature-controlled photosynthesis . For<br />
purposes of this model, net CO 2 fluxes int o<br />
the leaf are assigned a positive value whil e<br />
CO 2 losses are considered negative .<br />
Psn(L,T) = Ps(L,T)-Rs(T) (1)<br />
The functional form of the model can b e<br />
expanded around the following exponential<br />
expression that is representative of the ligh t<br />
curve in figure 1 .<br />
Psn(L,T) = Bo(T) (1 - exp(B 1 L)) - Rs(T) (2 )<br />
Rs(T) is negative and represents dark respiration<br />
. Bo(T) represents the light-saturate d<br />
asymptote as a function of temperature . Th e<br />
exponential coefficient (B 1 ) determine s<br />
response behavior at low light levels and is<br />
characteristically independent of temperature .<br />
Bo (T) can be represented by a quadratic function<br />
of the following form :<br />
Where :<br />
B o (T) = Bo + B i (T-B ) 2 (3 )<br />
Bo : maximum photosynthesi s<br />
B ; : slope coefficient ; negative algebraic sign<br />
B2 : temperature of maximum photosynthesi s<br />
Respiration as a function of temperature<br />
(Rs(T)) can be modeled with the followin g<br />
expression :<br />
Rs(T) = Boexp(BI (T-B.) - exp(BI (T-B . )) )<br />
Bo /exp(1) : maximum respiratio n<br />
B1 : slope coefficient ; positive sign<br />
B 2 : temperature of maximum respiratio n<br />
238
This function is asymptotic to zero respiration<br />
at both low and high temperatures an d<br />
exhibits an exponential increase in respiratio n<br />
followed by a rapid decline at high<br />
temperatures .<br />
The completed functional expression fo r<br />
Psn(L,T) is :<br />
Psn(L,T) = -Boexp[B 1 (T-B2 )-exp(B 1 (T-B2 ))]<br />
+ [ B 2 + B3 ( T -B4 ) 2 ] [1 - exp(B s L ) ]<br />
(4)<br />
The intent of this model is to predict ne t<br />
photosynthesis in light and CO 2 losses in<br />
darkness. The model is not useful for predicting<br />
gross photosynthesis without including<br />
some function for respiration in the light .<br />
Until the experimental techniques for obtaining<br />
such measurements are developed, th e<br />
light respiration term must remain implicit i n<br />
the gross photosynthesis function . This limit s<br />
the use of the model although most C 3 plant s<br />
will respond similarly . A different model may<br />
be required for C 4 plants such as grasses that<br />
require a much higher light level to saturat e<br />
photosynthesis .<br />
Methods and Materials<br />
Values for the six parameters in the model<br />
were determined with a least squares fit of th e<br />
data using an algorithm developed by Marquardt<br />
(1963) . Net photosynthetic data were<br />
taken with a controlled environment syste m<br />
developed by Webb (1971) . The test organis m<br />
for the model was red alder (Alnus rubra<br />
Bong.) .<br />
Forty red alder seedlings, 1- to 2-years-old ,<br />
were removed from the field and propagated<br />
in a nutrient culture before transferring them<br />
to the gas-tight controlled environment chamber.<br />
The root system of the seedlings was en -<br />
closed in a nutrient flow system with temperature<br />
controlled at 11°C ± 1°C . The plants<br />
were maintained in this system for 1 month at<br />
conditions of light and temperature consisten t<br />
with those in the greenhouse .<br />
Carbon dioxide absorption rates were measured<br />
by monitoring the CO 2 depletion in the<br />
gas-tight environment chamber with a Beckman<br />
IR gas analyzer. Atmospheric CO 2 levels<br />
in the chamber were maintained between 32 0<br />
and 335 p .p.m. Light energy was varied from<br />
0.06 to 0 .68 ly/min (total shortwave radiation)<br />
at air temperatures from 5 to 30°C . For<br />
each of five light levels, CO 2 uptake was<br />
measured while temperature was changed a t<br />
the rate of 1° per 5 minutes beginning at<br />
15°C and proceeding upscale to approximately<br />
30°C . Measurements were then made<br />
while decreasing temperature at the same rat e<br />
until near 5°C at which time temperature wa s<br />
increased again up to 16°C . All CO 2 uptak e<br />
measurements were made during 3 successiv e<br />
days. Relative humidity varied between 6 5<br />
percent at low temperatures to 75 percent at<br />
high temperatures .<br />
Results<br />
A portion of the data is plotted in figures 3<br />
and 4 . The photosynthetic response to radiation<br />
in figure 3 is characterized by a linea r<br />
response at low light followed by the usual<br />
light-saturated response at high radiation . Thi s<br />
is consistent with the findings of many other<br />
investigators . The saturation value for ne t<br />
photosynthesis increases with temperature ,<br />
but the increase is not linear .<br />
Figure 4 shows the net photosynthetic<br />
response to temperature for constant radiation<br />
of 0 .19 ly/min . A quadratic function wa s<br />
fit to the data and the parameters with their<br />
respective standard errors are listed in figure<br />
4 . At 0.19 ly/min, net photosynthesis has a<br />
maximum of 20 .5°C. Although these data<br />
represent the temperature range between 5 .5 °<br />
and 27°, the data of Pisek et al . (1969) indicate<br />
a nearly symmetrical response betwee n<br />
5° and 40°C. Extrapolation of the quadratic<br />
beyond this temperature range should b e<br />
done cautiously although Phillips an d<br />
McWilliams (1971) have measured zero CO 2<br />
fluxes at high temperatures . It may be that<br />
high temperatures increase respiration until it<br />
exceeds the photosynthetic capacity .<br />
Figure 5 illustrates the response surface<br />
generated by expression (4) which is the net<br />
239
w 10 0<br />
0<br />
U)<br />
w 80<br />
1-<br />
z<br />
>-<br />
u)<br />
0 60<br />
I--<br />
0<br />
22 °<br />
i6 °<br />
Psn t Rs (TI + Bo (T1 (I - e B2y<br />
°<br />
0<br />
t- 40<br />
w<br />
z<br />
w ><br />
2 0<br />
J<br />
w<br />
cc<br />
0<br />
1<br />
0 .2 0 .4 0.6 0 .8<br />
TOTAL SHORTWAVE RADIATIO N<br />
Figure 3 . Light effects on net photosynthesis of red alder at three temperatures .<br />
0 O<br />
w 4 0<br />
z<br />
w<br />
>_<br />
1- 20<br />
J<br />
w<br />
cc<br />
I<br />
10 20 30 40<br />
TEM<strong>PE</strong>RATURE, ° C<br />
Figure 4 . Net photosynthetic response of red alder to temperature at 0 .19 ly/min total s.w . radiation .<br />
240
The important interaction between light<br />
and temperature can best be shown by numerical<br />
example . Table 1 shows the predicted<br />
temperature of maximum net photosynthesis ,<br />
or optimum temperature, and the peaks of<br />
net photosynthesis for each of five levels of<br />
light. Both the optimum temperature and th e<br />
peaks of net photosynthesis increase with<br />
light. The latter is exemplary of photosynthetic<br />
light saturation .<br />
Table 1. Predicted effect of light on<br />
maximum net photosynthesis<br />
Light Relative Temperature of<br />
ly/min maximum Psn maximum Psn<br />
Figure 5 . Response surface of net CO 2 exchange generated<br />
by Psn(L,T) = -513.3 exp[ .088(T-47.7) -<br />
exp .088(T-47.71] + [187 .3 - .105(T-41 .41 2 1<br />
[1 - exp(-9.59L)] .<br />
photosynthetic response to both light an d<br />
temperature . The functional form of the surface<br />
is included in figure 5 along with th e<br />
values of the 6 parameters obtained from a<br />
least-squares fit of the CO 2 exchange data.<br />
The average deviation of the function fro m<br />
the data was ±9 .1-pct . and the r 2 was 0 .97 .<br />
Note that the light saturation phenomeno n<br />
of photosynthesis is conserved in this model<br />
as well as the symmetrical response to temperature.<br />
Although there are no data below 5 °<br />
and above 30°, the model seems well-behave d<br />
in the regions outside the data. As light decreases<br />
the gross photosynthesis functio n<br />
tends toward 0, and the dark respiration function<br />
begins to dominate . Below the light<br />
compensation point CO 2 fluxes become negative.<br />
At zero light only respiration occurs, an d<br />
because the function goes asymptotically t o<br />
zero at both low and high temperatures, the<br />
model never predicts an uptake of CO 2 in<br />
darkness .<br />
0 .07 27 .8 1 6<br />
.15 65 .5 2 0<br />
.19 76 .2 2 1<br />
.25 90 .8 2 2<br />
.68 100 .0 23<br />
The increased temperature of maximu m<br />
net photosynthesis associated with additiona l<br />
light can be explained as an interaction between<br />
the gross photosynthesis function an d<br />
dark respiration . At low light, photorespiration<br />
is minimal and photosynthesis is largely<br />
independent of the temperature increases that<br />
step-up dark respiration . Therefore, dark<br />
respiratory CO 2 losses from cellular maintenance<br />
are not compensated by photosynthesis<br />
as temperatures rise and maximum net photo -<br />
synthesis (photosnythesis minus respiration )<br />
occurs at a relatively low temperature . As<br />
light increases, photosynthesis and its depend -<br />
ence on temperature increases . This allows<br />
photosynthesis to keep pace with temperature-controlled<br />
dark respiration and maxi -<br />
mum net photosynthesis then shifts to a<br />
higher temperature .<br />
Although the model is empirical, it has<br />
several noteworthy features . The model is<br />
continuous over a wide range of independent<br />
variables and is therefore more mathemati-<br />
24 1
cally tractable than discontinuous or piece -<br />
wise continuous models . This continuous feature<br />
should facilitate linking this model t o<br />
others .<br />
The general net photosynthetic response of<br />
plants to light and to temperature has been<br />
demonstrated with many different specie s<br />
under various preconditioning treatments .<br />
The general responses characterized in figur e<br />
1 predominate with various shifts in the pea k<br />
and magnitude of the response curves . These<br />
shifts can be described mathematically by<br />
determining CO 2 exchange at certain point s<br />
and using these data to define parameters in<br />
the basic model .<br />
In the Biome program, CO 2 exchange<br />
studies are being conducted on several species<br />
and these data will further test the model pro -<br />
posed here. A necessary addition to the model<br />
is an explicit evaluation of light respiratio n<br />
from which techniques for data acquisitio n<br />
are now being contemplated .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
Thanks are due Michael Newton and Duan e<br />
Starr for their contribution to the model an d<br />
to Jack Colby for his programming assistance .<br />
The work reported in this paper was sup -<br />
ported by the PHS grant 2P10-Es00210 i n<br />
cooperation with the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong><br />
Biome, U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems, International<br />
Biological Program . This is Contribution<br />
No . 39 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Chartier, P . 1969. A model of CO 2 assimilation<br />
in the leaf . In Prediction and measurement<br />
of photosynthetic productivity, p .<br />
307-315 . US/IBP Tech. Meet. Proc . ,<br />
Trebon .<br />
Forward, Dorothy F. 1960 . Effect of temperature<br />
on respiration . In W . Ruhlan d<br />
(ed .), Encyclopedia of plant physiology, p .<br />
234-258 . Berlin : Springer-Verlag.<br />
Heath, O .V .S. 1969 . The physiological aspect s<br />
of photosynthesis . 309 p. London : Heinemann<br />
Educ . Books Ltd .<br />
Larcher, W. 1969 . Physiological approaches t o<br />
the measurement of photosynthesis in relation<br />
to dry matter production by trees .<br />
Photosynthetica 3(2) : 150-166 .<br />
Longridge, J. 1963. Biochemical aspects of<br />
temperature response. Annu. Rev. Plant<br />
Physiol. 14 : 441-462 .<br />
Marquardt, Donald W . 1963 . An algorithm for<br />
least-squares estimation of nonlinear<br />
parameters. J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math . 11(2) :<br />
431 .<br />
Milner, Harold W., and William H . Hiesey .<br />
1963. Photosynthesis in climatic races o f<br />
Mimulus . I. Effect of light intensive and<br />
temperature on rate . Plant Physiol . 39(2) :<br />
208-213 .<br />
Mooney, H. A., and A. T. Harrison. 1969 . The<br />
influence of conditioning temperature on<br />
subsequent temperature-related photosynthetic<br />
capacity in higher plants . In Prediction<br />
and measurement of photosynthetic<br />
productivity, p. 411-417 . US/IBP Tech .<br />
Meet. Proc., Trebon .<br />
Phillips, V . R., and J. R. McWilliams . 1971 .<br />
Thermal responses of primary carb o<br />
enzymes from C 3 and C 4 plant adapted to<br />
contrasting temperature environments . In<br />
M . D. Hatch, C . B . Osmund, and R . O .<br />
Slatyer (eds .), Photosynthesis and photorespiration,<br />
p . 97-109. Conf., Canberra,<br />
Australia, Nov. 1970 (Proc .). New York :<br />
Wiley-Interscience .<br />
Pisek, A., W. Larcher, W. Moser, and Ida<br />
Pack. 1969. Kardinale Temperaturbereiche<br />
der Photosynthese and Grenz-temperaturen<br />
des L e b ens der Blatter verschiedener<br />
S permato-phyten. III. Temperaturabhangegkeit<br />
and optimaler Temperaturbereich<br />
der Netto-Photosynthese. Flora 158 :<br />
608-630 .<br />
Rabinowitch, E . 1969 . Photosynthesis . 273 p .<br />
New York : John Wiley & Sons, Inc .<br />
Schulze, Ernst-Detlef. 1970. Der C02 -<br />
Gaswechsel der Buche (Fagus siluatica L . )<br />
in Abhangrgkeit von den Klimafaktoren i m<br />
Freiland. Flora 159 : 177-232 .<br />
Webb, Warren L. 1971 . Photosynthetic response<br />
models for a terrestrial plant community,<br />
79 p. Ph.D. thesis on file, Oreg.<br />
State Univ., Corvallis .<br />
242
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium.<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Energy flux studies in a<br />
coniferous forest ecosystem<br />
Abstract<br />
Lloyd W. Ga y<br />
Associate Professor of <strong>Forest</strong> Climatolog y<br />
Department of <strong>Forest</strong> Engineerin g<br />
Oregon State University<br />
Corvallis, Orego n<br />
The fluxes of thermal energy between the atmosphere and a young Douglas-fir forest were measured durin g<br />
two contrasting summer days, one cloudless and one overcast. The energy budget components were evaluated<br />
by the Bowen ratio method, with ceramic-wick psychrometers at the 26 .16 m, 28.16 m, or 31 .16 m levels. The<br />
maximum height of the tallest trees was 28 m, and the general level at the top of the closed canopy was abou t<br />
22 m. Daily totals of the energy budget components (cal/cm 2 ) under cloudless skies on July 29, 1971, were :<br />
solar radiation, 584; net radiation, 410 ; change in storage, 5 ; convection, -135; and latent energy, -280. The<br />
albedo was 0.09 on both the clear and the overcast day . Analysis of the overcast conditions of July 31, 1971 ,<br />
yielded the following values: solar radiation, 171 ; net radiation, 134 ; change in storage, 6 ; convection, -39; and<br />
latent energy, -102.<br />
Problems of measurement and analysis are discussed. These include the storage term in the biomass, and th e<br />
small gradients of potential temperature and vapor pressure above the canopy . Clear day gradients at noon, for<br />
example, were in the order of -0.03°C m-' and -0.03 mb m-' . Techniques are presented for minimizing measurement<br />
errors.<br />
Introduction<br />
The level of biological activity at the surface<br />
of the earth is closely associated wit h<br />
cycles of energy and mass . The cycles of mas s<br />
and of energy are virtually interchangeabl e<br />
concepts. Indeed, the transpiration an d<br />
photosynthetic components of the mass cycl e<br />
can be studied through examination of th e<br />
cycle of energy, with the energy required t o<br />
change the phase of H2 0 and CO 2 serving as<br />
the connecting link .<br />
The magnitudes and phase relationships of<br />
the mass and energy cycles are affected by th e<br />
characteristics of the surface, and by the stat e<br />
of the atmosphere . The properties of vegetation,<br />
particularly of low, cultivated ecosystems,<br />
have been investigated thoroughly i n<br />
a variety of studies that have clearly demonstrated<br />
many advantages for energy budge t<br />
evaluations of transpiration and photosynthesis<br />
(Baumgartner 1965) . The advantage s<br />
include sensitivity, mobility, and the benefit s<br />
to be gained by use of a nondestructive technique<br />
. The application of these techniques t o<br />
the forest ecosystem appears feasible and useful.<br />
A number of studies have already been<br />
reported, but in general the effects of forest s<br />
upon the cycles are not yet well known<br />
(Baumgartner 1971, Tajchman 1971) . Coniferous<br />
forests, as a class, are good absorbers of<br />
solar radiation. The roughness of coniferou s<br />
crowns also appears to effectively enhanc e<br />
mixing in the atmosphere near the top of th e<br />
canopy. These factors, combined with the<br />
large surface area of canopies, make forests<br />
into very efficient exchange surfaces for water<br />
vapor, carbon dioxide, and energy .<br />
Studies of the fundamental cycles of energ y<br />
and mass have begun at the Cedar River site i n<br />
the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome. A variety of<br />
interrelated studies are planned in coopera -<br />
243
tion with physiologists, soil scientists, hydrologists,<br />
and meteorologists . The wor k<br />
reported here is of preliminary research int o<br />
the exchange of thermal energy between a<br />
young Douglas-fir forest and the atmosphere .<br />
The energy exchange processes have bee n<br />
evaluated during two contrasting conditions :<br />
the first during clear, warm weather characterized<br />
by a large energy input to the forest ,<br />
and the second during cool, overcast conditions<br />
with a relatively small energy input to<br />
the forest. The objectives are to define th e<br />
energy transfer characteristics of the youn g<br />
forest under conditions of both high and lo w<br />
rates of transpiration . Study of these contrasting<br />
conditions will help us to understand the<br />
processes that control the exchange of energy<br />
and water vapor between the forest canop y<br />
and the atmosphere .<br />
<strong>Experimental</strong> Methods<br />
The evaluation of thermal energy exchange<br />
in the forest is simple in concept, requirin g<br />
that appropriate boundaries be defined abou t<br />
the forest site, that the quantities of energ y<br />
crossing the boundaries be identified, and that<br />
appropriate measurements be made at periodic<br />
intervals . The periodic samples can the n<br />
be combined to yield estimates of energy ex -<br />
change for the desired time interval . Th e<br />
selection of an appropriate model is an important<br />
step in evaluating the thermal energy<br />
exchange .<br />
Energy Transfer Models<br />
Several review articles have discussed th e<br />
application of various energy transfer model s<br />
to the problem of evaluating the exchange between<br />
the forest and the atmosphere<br />
(Baumgartner 1965, Federer 1970, Fritsche n<br />
1970) .<br />
The basic problem concerns the transformation<br />
of energy by the forest from radiant<br />
to nonradiant forms . The total energy thus<br />
transformed is called net radiation, Q* ; this<br />
equals the quantity of radiation of all wavelengths<br />
absorbed at the surface, minus th e<br />
radiation lost by reflection and emission . The<br />
net radiation is transformed into either a<br />
change in stored heat in the soil and biomass ,<br />
G; a flow of convective (sensible) energy between<br />
the forest and the air, H; or a flow of<br />
latent heat, AE, that is associated with a flux<br />
of water vapor E . The amount of energy<br />
transformed in photosynthesis, P, is of great<br />
importance in productivity . However, since i t<br />
amounts to only a few percent in terms of the<br />
net radiation flux over the forest (Denmead<br />
1969), P will be neglected in this study .<br />
The rate and direction of energy transfer<br />
depends upon the relative energy states of th e<br />
canopy and the atmosphere and upon th e<br />
availability of radiant energy which is derived<br />
primarily from the sun . The state of energy is<br />
determined by temperature and by vapor concentrations.<br />
Motion of the atmosphere may<br />
also enhance energy transfer . Energy transfer<br />
models thus use measurements of temperature,<br />
vapor concentration, wind, and radian t<br />
energy in order to determine the flow of<br />
energy between the forest and the atmosphere .<br />
The "Bowen ratio" model was selected for<br />
use in this study because of relative simplicity<br />
in analysis and application, and because of its<br />
general acceptance based upon tests over<br />
other types of vegetation . The method was<br />
first derived by Bowen (1926), and has been<br />
adapted for energy transfer studies by a<br />
number of workers (Fritschen 1965, Tanner<br />
1960) .<br />
The Bowen ratio model has been thoroughly<br />
described elsewhere, but a short discussion<br />
here will help to place its applicatio n<br />
into perspective . First, we must sum th e<br />
thermal energy fluxes active in the forest i n<br />
accordance with the principle of conservatio n<br />
of energy, to obtain<br />
Q*+G+H+XE+P=0 . (1)<br />
The polarity convention considers fluxes t o<br />
the surface as positive . After neglectin g<br />
photosynthesis, equation 1 can be solved for<br />
latent energy to yield<br />
XE = - (Q* + G) / (1 + (3) ( 2)<br />
where i3 is the Bowen ratio of convective hea t<br />
to latent heat (H/XE). The Bowen ratio can be<br />
written<br />
244
(3 = H/AE=yo$/De (3 )<br />
where y is the psychrometric constan t<br />
(y ^ 0 .66 mb/°C at sea level) and Da and<br />
De represent the measured differences i n<br />
potential temperature and in vapor pressure at<br />
two levels in the atmosphere above, but near ,<br />
the surface .<br />
The Bowen ratio model thus provides a<br />
rationale for partitioning the measured suppl y<br />
of thermal energy into convection and laten t<br />
heat, based upon measurements of temperature<br />
and vapor concentration at only two<br />
levels above the canopy surface. Wind measurements<br />
are not required for the analysis ,<br />
although they are often useful in interpretation<br />
of the results . The supply of thermal<br />
energy (Q* + G) is measured, so limits ar e<br />
placed on the estimates of convection and<br />
latent heat with this method .<br />
The disadvantages of the model are primarily<br />
associated with instrumentation ;<br />
accurate measurements are required in order<br />
to measure the small gradients in temperatur e<br />
and vapor found near the forest canopy . In<br />
addition, the basic relationship in equation 2<br />
becomes undefined whenever 0=-1 . This<br />
normally occurs infrequently, and ordinarily<br />
only for short periods near dawn or dusk<br />
when the amount of available energy i s<br />
limited. The magnitude of H and XE wil l<br />
normally be small at such times .<br />
Site Conditions<br />
The energy exchange studies were carrie d<br />
out in the broad, flat valley of the Ceda r<br />
River, near Seattle, Washington. The soil and<br />
stand conditions have been described by<br />
Fritschen (1972) . The stand is second-growth<br />
Douglas-fir approximately 35 years old, with<br />
an average of 570 trees per ha . The stand<br />
canopy is relatively level ; the height of the<br />
tips of the tallest trees in the vicinity of th e<br />
experimental site is about 28 m . The site is<br />
adjacent to the lysimeter tree described by<br />
Fritschen (1972) . A series of energy transfer<br />
studies are planned at this site in the future ,<br />
using the lysimeter tree, meteorological<br />
towers, and a variety of models for evaluatin g<br />
energy exchange processes .<br />
Field Measurement s<br />
Net radiation, stored heat, and temperature<br />
and vapor pressure measurements were obtained<br />
with a mobile data acquisition that ha s<br />
been described by Gay . l The truck-mounted<br />
system includes sensors and supports, cabling ,<br />
and a digital data logger with resolution of<br />
0.001 percent (0 .1 microvolt on a 10 millivol t<br />
scale). Ceramic wick, wet-bulb psychrometers<br />
of the basic design of Lourence and Pruit t<br />
(1969), as modified by Gay (n .d.), were used<br />
for the temperature and vapor pressur e<br />
measurements.<br />
The sensors were mounted on a 33 .5 m<br />
(110 ft) tall, triangular TV tower about 0 .3 m<br />
(1 foot) in width. Wind, temperature, and<br />
vapor pressure measurements were made a t<br />
six levels, respectively, 26 .16, 27 .16, 28 .16 ,<br />
29 .16, 30 .16, and 31 .16 m above the fores t<br />
floor. The radiation budget components were<br />
measured from a height of 30 .66 m above th e<br />
floor. The tip of the tallest tree in the vicinity<br />
of the tower extended to 28 m, though th e<br />
bulk of the crowns were below 24 m, and th e<br />
general level of crown closure was about 20 t o<br />
22 m above the floor . Five soil heat flux disks<br />
were installed at the -2 cm level, just beneat h<br />
the surface of mineral soil on the forest floor .<br />
Observations began on July 27 and continued<br />
through August 1. The sensors were<br />
sampled at 5-minute intervals during the day ,<br />
and at 10-minute intervals at night . The observation<br />
period spanned a range of weather conditions<br />
that included one clear and one completely<br />
overcast day. The data acquisitio n<br />
system performed well during this period .<br />
Problems in <strong>Forest</strong> Energy<br />
Budget Analyses<br />
A variety of measurement problems are en -<br />
countered in energy budget studies. In addition,<br />
forests have unique characteristics o f<br />
scale and mass that affect the application o f<br />
I L . W. Gay. An environmental data acquisitio n<br />
system . National Conference on the <strong>Forest</strong>, Weather ,<br />
and Associated Environment, Atlanta, Georgia, May<br />
18-19, 1971 . Mimeo., 8 p . Abstracted : Bull. Am .<br />
Meteor . Soc . 52 : 202-203 .<br />
245
the basic energy budget model given in equation<br />
2 . The gradients of temperature an d<br />
vapor above the rough, porous forest canop y<br />
are very slight, and measurement difficultie s<br />
increase with small gradients . Another major<br />
problem is related to the difficulty of measuring<br />
changes in stored energy in the biomass of<br />
the forest . These problems will be placed int o<br />
perspective at the Cedar River site, for the y<br />
affect the analyses and the subsequent interpretation<br />
of the results .<br />
Evaluation of Gradients<br />
Gradients of temperature, vapor concentration,<br />
and wind are small above fores t<br />
canopies, even though the transfer of energy<br />
and mass may be proceeding at high rates .<br />
The small gradients result from mixing induced<br />
by the mechanical turbulence create d<br />
by the rough canopy surface . In addition, the<br />
exchange surfaces are distributed through a<br />
considerable canopy depth so that the source s<br />
of heat and vapor are diffuse, rather tha n<br />
being concentrated as in the dense canopies of<br />
crops or other low vegetation . The smal l<br />
gradients above the forest require tha t<br />
extreme care be taken in the development o f<br />
suitable instrumentation, and in the experimental<br />
design controlling the deployment o f<br />
sensors .<br />
The Bowen ratio model assumed tha t<br />
steady state conditions prevail, i .e., the value s<br />
of the variables do not change with respect t o<br />
time during the period of analysis . This i s<br />
partially satisfied by averaging the values ove r<br />
the period of an hour before applying the<br />
model . Integration into hourly means als o<br />
reduces the small random component of error<br />
associated with the measurements. It does<br />
not, however, reduce biases that are introduced<br />
by small differences among sensors .<br />
Such biases can be a source of serious error ,<br />
particularly with small gradients that exis t<br />
above the forest . Bias errors must be handle d<br />
by techniques other than averaging .<br />
Two approaches have been used to cope<br />
with the problems involved in the measurement<br />
of small gradients above forests . In the<br />
first approach, the two levels of measuremen t<br />
required for the Bowen ratio are separated by<br />
a relatively large distance (10 m) in order to<br />
increase the differences that are being measured<br />
to a level commensurate with the sensitivity<br />
of the data system (Galoux et al . 1967 ,<br />
Storr et al. 1970) . In the second, reversing<br />
sensors have been used to cancel the effect of<br />
any small biases that may exist between<br />
sensors (Black and McNaughton 1971) .<br />
A large vertical separation of the sensors<br />
introduces questions of the representativenes s<br />
of the measured gradients which should represent<br />
the effect of the underlying surface . It is<br />
quite possible that a sensor placed 10 m abov e<br />
the canopy may be measuring properties o f<br />
the atmosphere that are derived from a surface<br />
other than the one under investigation .<br />
In contrast, a pair of reversing sensors, place d<br />
near the canopy, offers an excellent means fo r<br />
evaluating small gradients . However, the<br />
reversing mechanism introduces new problem s<br />
of design for operation and support in tal l<br />
forests .<br />
A graphical approach was used in this study<br />
to minimize sensor errors in the gradien t<br />
measurements used for the Bowen ratio<br />
analysis . Initially, the mean hourly values o f<br />
potential temperature were plotted agains t<br />
the associated values of vapor pressure t o<br />
yield 24 plots (1 per hour) for each day, with<br />
each plot containing six points (one for eac h<br />
measurement level) . The plots will be straigh t<br />
lines if similarity exists between the gradient s<br />
of potential temperature and vapor concentration,<br />
providing there are no errors of measurement<br />
(Tanner 1963). Since similarity is an<br />
assumption of the Bowen ratio method, thes e<br />
plots were used to separate out the instrument<br />
levels that exhibited small offset s<br />
throughout the day and to identify thos e<br />
levels appropriate for use in the Bowen rati o<br />
analysis .<br />
The similarity plots for July 29 are shown<br />
for levels 1, 4, 6 in figure IA, and for levels 1 ,<br />
2, 3 on July 31 in figure 1B . The potentia l<br />
temperature (e-) scale on the ordinate differ s<br />
between the 2 days. The vapor pressure (e )<br />
scale is shown in the legend . Note that the plo t<br />
for each hour has been normalized by subtracting<br />
the & and e value at the bottom level fro m<br />
the observations at each of the other levels .<br />
Therefore each plot actually shows the incre -<br />
246
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
v 0<br />
0<br />
w<br />
IX -0.2<br />
I-<br />
cr -0.4<br />
w<br />
-0.6<br />
~ 0.04<br />
A ..29<br />
JULY<br />
HOUR (PDT) -->- y y g i<br />
0 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 1I I 1 1! I r 17 .19 202122 23 2 4<br />
9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 o 18<br />
B. 31 JULY<br />
r<br />
a<br />
I<br />
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9<br />
HOUR (PDT)----4 .-<br />
10<br />
I I<br />
2.03.122! J<br />
1213 14 15 16 17 18 19 ° 1 23 24<br />
0- I<br />
u<br />
-0.04 • MB<br />
VAPOR PRESSURE, M B<br />
Figure 1 . Similarity between gradients of potential temperature and vapor pressure . A. Clear weather on Jul y<br />
29, 1971 . Levels 1, 4, and 6 . B . Overcast weather on July 31, 1971 . Levels 1, 2, and 3 .<br />
ment of a and e with respect to the firs t<br />
measurement level near the canopy .<br />
Though several points can be deduced fro m<br />
such similarity plots, the most important conclusion<br />
concerns adequacy of data . The linearity<br />
at the selected levels confirms their<br />
acceptability for the Bowen ratio model ,<br />
although an unexplained offset is evident at<br />
level 2 during the 1000-1200 hours on Jul y<br />
31 .<br />
Once the data is judged acceptable, on e<br />
notes that the slope of the lines is A&/Ae ; this<br />
is directly proportional to 0, the Bowen ratio ,<br />
as shown in equation 3 . Thus the relative<br />
slope of the similarity plots is an index to th e<br />
way that the surface is partitioning the net<br />
energy supply into convection and evaporation.<br />
Further, the quadrant of each hourl y<br />
plot indicates the sign of 0, and the direction<br />
of the H and XE fluxes .<br />
For example, as plotted in figure 1A and<br />
1B, both fluxes will have the same sense in<br />
quadrants I and III where the slope is positiv e<br />
((3>0). In quadrant I, H and XE are both directed<br />
away from the surface and are negative<br />
by the sign convention adopted earlier . In<br />
quadrant III, H and XE are both positive, a s<br />
their sense is toward the surface . The slop e<br />
and the (3 coefficient are negative in quadrant s<br />
II and IV. In quadrant II, H is toward th e<br />
surface (advection) while XE is directed away ,<br />
while the fluxes in quadrant IV have th e<br />
opposite sense . The similarity plots can thu s<br />
provide three things : a ready indication of the<br />
magnitude of the Bowen ratio ; an indicatio n<br />
of the direction of the H and E fluxes ; and an<br />
identification of levels suited for the Bowe n<br />
ratio analysis .<br />
247
Evaluation of Stored Hea t<br />
Application of the Bowen ratio model t o<br />
forest measurements reveals a problem i n<br />
measuring the stored heat term in equation 2<br />
that is a direct consequence of the nature of<br />
the forested surface . The scale of the forest<br />
elements makes the change in heat storage i n<br />
the biomass difficult to measure, and man y<br />
studies (Baumgartner 1956) have treate d<br />
these changes as negligible . This is certainly<br />
true on a daily basis, but an appreciable<br />
amount of energy appears to move into<br />
storage (-G) in the biomass in the early morning,<br />
and out again (+G) in the early evening .<br />
These amounts ordinarily will balance when<br />
totaled over the day, but comparisons amon g<br />
hourly totals may be in error unless the<br />
energy storage changes are estimated for th e<br />
biomass as well as for the soil .<br />
The estimates of biomass storage change<br />
were derived here by an indirect method that<br />
may prove useful in other situations as well .<br />
First, application of the Bowen ratio model to<br />
data collected during the early evening hours<br />
frequently resulted in positive estimates o f<br />
latent energy (condensation) when the vapo r<br />
gradient clearly indicated that evaporatio n<br />
was taking place . This apparent anomaly in<br />
the Bowen ratio estimate of XE could occur<br />
as a consequence of underestimating the<br />
storage term G . In order to obtain the proper<br />
sign on XE under these conditions, the estimate<br />
of G must be increased to a positiv e<br />
value that exceeds the absolute value of th e<br />
negative net radiation .<br />
Estimates of the minimum probable value<br />
of G were obtained in this manner for th e<br />
hours between sunset and the time near mid -<br />
night when the vapor gradient changed direction,<br />
indicating the beginning of condensation<br />
. As a second step, the crossover points<br />
between release (+G) and uptake (-G) o f<br />
stored energy were then estimated from m y<br />
experience and that of others (Grulois 1968 )<br />
as being about 1 hour after sunrise and 3<br />
hours before sunset . The release of store d<br />
heat (+G) is then defined by the two cross -<br />
over points and by the magnitude during th e<br />
early evening hours . The third and final ste p<br />
was to estimate the magnitude of the gain in<br />
storage (-G) during the morning hours so tha t<br />
the daily integral approximately balanced .<br />
The final result is a much better estimate o f<br />
hourly changes in stored energy than could be<br />
obtained by direct measurement of the soil<br />
storage component alone. The magnitude of<br />
the stored energy change will be investigate d<br />
further during future studies .<br />
The major problems in application of th e<br />
Bowen ratio model to the forest appear to b e<br />
associated with adequate precision of th e<br />
measurements. The similarity tests demonstrated<br />
here appear useful in eliminatin g<br />
errors from the data . Further, the changes in<br />
stored energy can be estimated by an indirect<br />
method, based upon gradient measuremen t<br />
and knowledge of the time at which th e<br />
stored heat flux reverses sign .<br />
The <strong>Forest</strong> Energy Budget<br />
Energy budget analyses were developed fo r<br />
2 days that represent quite different amount s<br />
of available energy . The solar energy input to<br />
the forest was large on July 29, 1971, a da y<br />
characterized by clear skies and a warm mea n<br />
temperature (24.4°C). In contrast, July 31 ,<br />
1971, was completely overcast with reduced<br />
levels of incoming solar radiation and a relatively<br />
cool mean temperature (17 .4°C) .<br />
Examination of the energy budgets unde r<br />
such contrasting conditions will improve our<br />
understanding of the basic processes tha t<br />
govern energy transfer between the forest and<br />
the atmosphere .<br />
The diurnal energy budget will first b e<br />
examined with respect to daily totals; a discussion<br />
of the relationships among hourly<br />
values of the energy budget components wil l<br />
then follow .<br />
The Diurnal Energy Budget<br />
The daily energy budget totals are presented<br />
for the separate periods of daylight (1 3<br />
hours) and night (11 hours) and for 24-hou r<br />
totals in table 1 . Dividing the daily totals into<br />
daylight and night portions enhances futur e<br />
comparisons that may be made with dat a<br />
collected under different daylengths at Ceda r<br />
River or elsewhere .<br />
248
Table L-Diurnal energy budget components '<br />
Period<br />
July 29-clear<br />
July 31-overcast<br />
Q* G H XE @* G H X E<br />
cal/cm2<br />
Daylight 454 -43 -143 -263 141 -7 -38 -9 6<br />
Night -44 48 8 -17 -7 13 -1 - 6<br />
Daily total 410 5 -135 -280 134 6 -39 -102<br />
1 Totals are given for the daylight hours, 0630-1930 PDT ; night hours, 1930-0630 PDT; and the full day ,<br />
0000-2400 PDT .<br />
There is a large difference in the radiatio n<br />
supply on the 2 days, as net radiation totale d<br />
410 cal/cm 2 under the clear skies of July 29 ,<br />
and only 134 cal/cm 2 for the overcast conditions<br />
of July 31 . These totals include a stead y<br />
net loss of radiation at night, amounting t o<br />
-44 cal/cm 2 under clear skies, and -7 cal/cm 2<br />
under the overcast conditions .<br />
The net radiation term represents the<br />
energy converted from radiative to nonradiative<br />
forms by the forested surface . The shortwave<br />
radiation from the sun makes up th e<br />
largest component of the net radiation . During<br />
the 13 hours of daylight on the clear day ,<br />
the forest received 584 cal/cm 2 of solar radiation<br />
and reflected 55 cal/cm 2 . Under overcast<br />
skies, the forest received 171, and reflected<br />
16, calories/cm 2 . The albedo was 0 .09 on<br />
both days .<br />
Since the gain and loss of longwave radiation<br />
also enters into the supply of radian t<br />
energy, it is not helpful to calculate a shortwave/net<br />
radiation ratio as an index of efficiency<br />
of conversion . However, the lo w<br />
albedo value (0.09) emphasizes the efficienc y<br />
with which the Douglas-fir canopy absorbs<br />
solar radiation. This low reflectivity is similar<br />
to values reported for other coniferous canopies<br />
(Stewart 1971), and is much lower tha n<br />
the 0 .2-0.25 albedo values that commonl y<br />
prevail over crops and other low vegetatio n<br />
(Monteith and Szeicz 1961) . As noted by<br />
Baumgartner (1971), forests are effectiv e<br />
absorbers of solar radiation .<br />
The changes in stored energy (G) tabulate d<br />
in table 1 for the 24-hour period are nea r<br />
zero, which is in accord with observation s<br />
reported elsewhere . This term represents the<br />
changes in heat storage of both the biomass<br />
and the soil. Most of the storage changes ar e<br />
attributed to the biomass ; the indirect<br />
methods used to estimate the changes in<br />
storage have been described in an earlier section<br />
.<br />
I estimate that -43 cal/cm 2 went into storage<br />
during the daylight hours on the clear da y<br />
and that 48 cal/cm 2 came out of storage during<br />
the night. The storage changes on the<br />
cloudy day proceeded in a similar direction ,<br />
but the magnitudes were much smaller .<br />
The storage term at Cedar River appear s<br />
large because of the large quantity of the biomass<br />
there . The biomass is as yet unmeasured ,<br />
however. Attempts will be made to measure<br />
the storage flux directly in future experiments .<br />
The convective flux for the clear day<br />
totaled -135 cal/cm 2 , directed away from the<br />
forest into the atmosphere . A slightly larger<br />
amount, -143 cal/cm2 , was lost during daylight,<br />
but 8 cal/cm2 was gained by the canopy<br />
at night when the canopy temperature s<br />
dropped below that of the air. Under overcas t<br />
sky conditions, -38 cal/cm 2 were lost over the<br />
full day .<br />
24 9
Latent energy was the largest dissipation<br />
term on each of the days, totaling -28 0<br />
cal/cm 2 for July 29 and -102 cal/cm 2 on July<br />
31 . There was a net loss of latent energy b y<br />
night, as well as by daylight, for both days .<br />
The evaporation equivalent of the laten t<br />
energy total was about 0 .5 cm on July 29 ,<br />
and 0 .18 cm on July 31 .<br />
The Bowen ratio ((3 =H/AE) is a measure of<br />
how the surface partitions the energy suppl y<br />
between sensible and latent heat . The mean<br />
daily value of 13 was 0.48 for the clear day ,<br />
and 0 .38 for the overcast day. The differenc e<br />
in (3 between days is not large, but it suggest s<br />
that the forest partitioned more of the energy<br />
supply into convection on the clear day tha n<br />
on the overcast day . From another viewpoint,<br />
the ratio of XE/Q* was 0 .67 on the sunn y<br />
day, and 0 .76 on the overcast day . This is i n<br />
the direction that one might expect for a<br />
stand of vegetation that receives a large inpu t<br />
of energy .<br />
Hourly Energy Budgets<br />
The phase relationships among the energy<br />
budget components can be examined with the<br />
aid of figure 2 which shows the hourly value s<br />
on July 29, and figure 3 which shows th e<br />
hourly values on July 31 . Each plotted poin t<br />
represents the midpoint of an hourly mean .<br />
The daytime, night and daily totals in table 1<br />
were integrated from the rates shown in thes e<br />
two figures . The 2 days exhibit different characteristics,<br />
so they will be discussed separately .<br />
The symmetry of the bell-shaped net radiation<br />
curve on July 29 confirms that the skie s<br />
were cloudless on that day . The maximu m<br />
intensity occurred during the hour centere d<br />
on 1300 hours PDT, which closely corresponded<br />
with solar noon . The net radiation<br />
values became positive about 1 hour after sun -<br />
rise and remained positive until shortly befor e<br />
sunset, indicating the hours in which there<br />
was a surplus of energy that might be dissipated<br />
through the other energy budget components.<br />
The net radiation was negative<br />
throughout the night, as the surface lost<br />
energy to the atmosphere. The greatest net<br />
radiation loss occurred at 2200, about 1 hou r<br />
after sunset at a time when the forest wes<br />
rapidly losing the absorbed solar radiatio n<br />
that had been stored during the day .<br />
The phase of the fluxes is also of interest ,<br />
4 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24<br />
TIME, HR (PDT )<br />
Figure 2. Energy budget components under clear skies . Symbols: net radiation, Q* ; change in heat storage of<br />
soil and biomass, G ; convection, H ; latent energy, AE .<br />
250
4 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24<br />
TIME, HR (PDT )<br />
Figure 3 . Energy budget components under overcast skies . Symbols : net radiation, Q* ; change in heat storage<br />
of soil and biomass, G ; convection, H ; latent energy, XE .<br />
as G, H, and XE all lag behind Q* . Let us<br />
consider the stored heat flux first . It reache s<br />
its peak flow into the biomass and soil (-G) i n<br />
midmorning, and reverses to flow out of th e<br />
biomass (+G) in the late afternoon and earl y<br />
evening. The change in stored heat appears t o<br />
provide a significant source of energy to th e<br />
surface throughout the night .<br />
The sensible heat flux, H, reaches its maxi -<br />
mum about two hours after G, but still a n<br />
hour before solar noon . Sensible heat i s<br />
directed away from the surface during day -<br />
light (-H), but reverses in direction as convection<br />
begins to provide energy (+H) to th e<br />
surface during the night . During this period ,<br />
the canopy cools below air temperature du e<br />
to longwave emission .<br />
The latent energy flux reached its maxi -<br />
mum about two hours after solar noon .<br />
Evaporation continued well into the night ;<br />
only during the early morning hours did a<br />
rather small amount of condensation tak e<br />
place .<br />
The marked phase shift between sensible<br />
and latent energy is of interest, as many<br />
studies have shown these two fluxes to be i n<br />
phase with net radiation (Baumgartner 1956 ,<br />
Denmead 1969, Rauner 1960) . The Douglas -<br />
fir forest, in contrast, partitioned the energy<br />
available at the surface into sensible and<br />
latent energy on a preferential basis . This<br />
partition was on a 1 :1 basis during the morning,<br />
but latent energy was apparently favored<br />
at the expense of sensible energy during th e<br />
afternoon . A similar pattern is evident i n<br />
measurements over a young Douglas-fir forest<br />
near Vancouver, B .C. (Black and McNaughto n<br />
1971), and over a mixed hardwood forest<br />
(Grulois 1968) .<br />
The phase shift in latent energy into the<br />
afternoon is probably related to a vapor pressure<br />
deficit which has an afternoon maximu m<br />
on clear days . Stewart and Thom 2 have concluded<br />
that the latent energy flux from thei r<br />
pine forest site in England is controlled more<br />
by the vapor pressure deficit than by th e<br />
supply of available energy . This conclusion is<br />
based upon their evaluation of the interplay<br />
between the relatively large internal resistanc e<br />
to transfer and a small external resistance ; the<br />
ratio for the pine site was in the order o f<br />
20 :1 .<br />
Conclusions<br />
The observations reported here are a n<br />
initial contribution toward the problem of<br />
evaluating the flow of energy and mass between<br />
the atmosphere and the young Douglas -<br />
fir forest at the Cedar River site .<br />
2 J . B. Stewart and A . S. Thom . Energy budgets i n<br />
pine forest. Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford ,<br />
Berkshire, U . K . Unpublished manuscript, 1972 .<br />
251
<strong>Forest</strong>ed surfaces are generally considere d<br />
to be effective energy exchange surfaces . Th e<br />
results confirm that this young stand has a<br />
high absorptivity for solar radiation, with a n<br />
albedo of 0 .09 for both clear and overcas t<br />
conditions . This high absorptivity contribute s<br />
to the large net radiation values that wer e<br />
measured under clear skies .<br />
The role of the forest in dissipating the net<br />
radiation is of particular interest. The porous ,<br />
aerodynamically rough canopy is effective i n<br />
transferring sensible and latent energy into<br />
the atmosphere . The large quantity of forest<br />
biomass may also involve an amount of store d<br />
thermal energy that is of significance durin g<br />
short periods, even though the daily totals are<br />
small . Summed over a 24-hour period, evapotranspiration<br />
was about 280 cal/cm 2 min (0 . 5<br />
cm water equivalent) or about two-thirds o f<br />
the net radiation that was transformed unde r<br />
clear skies . Evapotranspiration was relativel y<br />
larger on an overcast day, about three -<br />
quarters of net radiation, although the tota l<br />
amount of latent energy (102 cal/cm2 min, or<br />
0.18 cm water equivalent) was considerably<br />
lower .<br />
These results provide initial estimates o f<br />
the amounts of energy transferred during extreme<br />
conditions under cloudless and unde r<br />
overcast skies . The exchange of energy an d<br />
mass depends not only upon the energy inpu t<br />
to the forest, however, but also upon the<br />
physiological response of the vegetation . No w<br />
that the instrumentation system and the<br />
analysis model have been tested at this site ,<br />
subsequent research will include a range of<br />
environmental conditions . Instrumentation<br />
development and model testing will continue<br />
in cooperation with the lysimeter installatio n<br />
and eddy flux system of cooperating investigators<br />
. Ultimately, analysis and interpretatio n<br />
of the energy transfer studies must include<br />
physiological as well as physical characteristics<br />
of the stand .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The work upon which this publication i s<br />
based was supported in part by funds provided<br />
by the U .S. Department of Interior,<br />
Office of Water Resources Research, as<br />
authorized under the Water Resources Re -<br />
search Act of 1964, and administered by th e<br />
Water Resources Research Institute, Orego n<br />
State University ; and the National Scienc e<br />
Foundation Grant No . GB-20963 to the<br />
Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome, U .S. Analysis o f<br />
Ecosystems, International Biological Program .<br />
This is Contribution No . 40 to the Coniferous<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Biome and Paper 844, <strong>Forest</strong> Researc h<br />
Laboratory, School of <strong>Forest</strong>ry, Oregon State<br />
University .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Baumgartner, A. 1956 . Investigations on th e<br />
heat- and water economy of a young forest.<br />
Translated from Ber . Deut . Wetterdienst 5 :<br />
4-53 . Commonwealth Sci. & Ind. Res .<br />
Organ . Translation 3760, Melbourne ,<br />
Australia, 1958 .<br />
1965. The heat, water and car -<br />
bon dioxide budget of plant cover : methods<br />
and measurements . In F. E . Eckardt<br />
(ed.), Methodology of plant eco-physiology:<br />
Proceedings of the Montpellie r<br />
Symposium, p. 495-512 . Paris: UNESCO .<br />
1971 . Wald als Austauschfakto r<br />
in der Grenzschicht Erde/Atmosphare .<br />
Forstwiss. Cbl. 3: 174-182 .<br />
Black, T. A., and K. G. McNaughton . 1971 .<br />
Psychrometric apparatus for Bowen-ratio<br />
determination over forests . Bound . Laye r<br />
Meteorol . 2 : 246-254 .<br />
Bowen, I. S. 1926 . The ratio of heat losses by<br />
conduction and by evaporation from an y<br />
water surface . Phys. Rev . 27 : 779-787 .<br />
Denmead, O. T. 1969 . Comparative micro -<br />
meteorology of a wheat field and a fores t<br />
of Pinus radiata . Agric. Meteorol. 6 :<br />
357-371 .<br />
Federer, C. A. 1970. Measuring forest evapotranspiration-theory<br />
and problems . USDA<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Serv . Res . Pap . NE-165, 25 p .<br />
Northeast. <strong>Forest</strong> Exp . Stn ., Upper Darby ,<br />
Pa .<br />
Fritschen, L . J. 1965 . Accuracy of evapotranspiration<br />
determinations by the Bowe n<br />
ratio method . Bull. Int. Assoc . Sci. Hydrol .<br />
10: 38-48 .<br />
252
1970. Evapotranspiration an d<br />
meteorological methods of estimation as<br />
applied to forests . In J . M. Powell and C .<br />
F. Nolasco (eds .), Proceedings of the Third<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Microclimate Symposium, p. 8-27 .<br />
Can. For. Serv ., Calgary, Alberta.<br />
1972. The lysimeter installation<br />
on the Cedar River Watershed . In Jerry F .<br />
Franklin, L. J. Dempster, and Richard H .<br />
Waring (eds.), Proceedings-research on<br />
coniferous forest ecosystems-a symposium,<br />
p. 255-260, illus . Pac. Northwes t<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> & Range Exp . Stn ., Portland, Oreg.<br />
Galoux, A., G . Schnock, and J . Grulois . 1967 .<br />
Les installations ecoclimatologiques .<br />
Travaux Stat . Rech . Eaux et Forets ,<br />
Groenendaal-Hoeilaart, S4rie A, 12, 52 p .<br />
Gay, L. W. (n .d.) On the construction and use<br />
of ceramic-wick psychrometers . In R. W .<br />
Brown and B . P. Van Haveren (eds .) ,<br />
Psychrometry in water relations research .<br />
Utah Agric . Exp. Stn. (In press . )<br />
Grulois, J. 1968 . Flux thermiques et evapotranspiration<br />
au tours d 'une journ4e<br />
sereine . Bull. Soc . r. Botanique Belg . 102 :<br />
27-41 .<br />
Lourence, F. J ., and W. O. Pruitt . 1969 . A<br />
psychrometer system for micrometeoro<br />
l o gy profile determination. J. Appl .<br />
Meteorol . 8: 492-498 .<br />
Monteith, J. L., and G. Szeicz. 1961. Th e<br />
radiation balance of bare soil and vegetation.<br />
Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 87 :<br />
159-170 .<br />
Rauner, Yu. L. 1960 . The heat balance of forests.<br />
Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Seriya<br />
Geograficheskaya. 1 : 49-59 . Translated by<br />
Israel Prog. Sci. Transl. No. 1342 . U .S .<br />
Dep. Commerce, Washington, D .C .<br />
Stewart, J . B. 1971. The albedo of a pine forest.<br />
Quart. J. Roy . Meteorol. Soc. 97 :<br />
561-564 .<br />
Storr, D., J . Tomlain, H . F . Cork, and R . E .<br />
Munn. 1970. An energy budget study<br />
above the forest canopy at Marmot Creek ,<br />
Alberta, 1967 . Water Resour . Res. 6 :<br />
705-716 .<br />
Tanner, C . B. 1960. Energy balance approac h<br />
to evapotranspiration from crops . Soil Sci .<br />
Soc . Am . Proc . 24: 1-9 .<br />
1963 . Basic instrumentation an d<br />
measurements for plant environment an d<br />
micrometeorology . Soils Bull . 6, various<br />
pagination . Madison : Univ . Wis .<br />
Tajchman, S . J. 1971 . Evapotranspiration an d<br />
energy balances of forest and field. Water<br />
Resour. Res . 7: 511-523 .<br />
253
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
The lysimeter installation on<br />
the Cedar River Watershed<br />
Leo J . Fritsche n<br />
Associate Professo r<br />
College of <strong>Forest</strong> Resource s<br />
University of Washingto n<br />
Seattle, Washingto n<br />
Abstract<br />
A lysimeter was built around the root ball of a 28 m Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) tree. The container ,<br />
tree, and soil weigh 28,900 kg. The sensitivity of the weighing mechanism is 630g which is equivalent t o<br />
0.06 mm of water. The installation will be used to study evapotranspiration and volume changes in relation t o<br />
soil water potential and atmospheric demand; to test cuvette and meteorological methods ; determine canop y<br />
interception ; and to assess the effects of irrigation and fertilization .<br />
Introduction<br />
Understanding the process and quantifying<br />
the rate of water transfer within a forest ecosystem<br />
has become increasingly more important<br />
in recent years . This concern has originated<br />
from both applied and basic directions .<br />
For example, it has been estimated that by<br />
1980, six major regions will have no wate r<br />
reserve. These regions are Colorado River ,<br />
South Pacific, Great Basin, Upper Ri o<br />
Grande, Pecos River, and Upper Missour i<br />
River (Colorado River Association 1966) .<br />
Furthermore, interbasin transfer is bein g<br />
practiced in at least two areas at the presen t<br />
time .<br />
Increasing need for water conservation, th e<br />
possibility of interbasin water transfer, and<br />
the treatment of watersheds to increase yiel d<br />
or change quality has demonstrated the nee d<br />
for additional research on water use by various<br />
types of vegetative cover. For example ,<br />
clearcutting a north-facing Coweeta watershe d<br />
resulted in a 1st year increase streamflow o f<br />
40.2 cm and a stabilized increase of 23 .8 cm .<br />
Although the 1st year 's increase from a south -<br />
facing watershed was only 15 cm which de -<br />
creased to insignificance by the 3d year<br />
(Swift, unpublished data), it is believed that<br />
the different microclimatic influences upon<br />
the vegetation and resulting evapotranspiration<br />
will account for the discrepancy in wate r<br />
yield. To understand fully the processes involved<br />
and to predict results from futur e<br />
cuttings require detailed investigations relating<br />
water use to its availability and to atmospheric<br />
conditions .<br />
Short-period (1 hour or less) determinations<br />
of evapotranspiration are necessary t o<br />
study the complex soil-plant-atmospheric relations.<br />
Many methods or combination o f<br />
methods have been employed to determin e<br />
evapotranspiration. The major ones includ e<br />
watershed runoff ; measurement of soi l<br />
moisture depletion by either gravimetri c<br />
sampling, with resistance blocks, or with neutron<br />
soil moisture meters ; use of weighin g<br />
lysimeters ; and application of meteorologica l<br />
models . Other methods have employe d<br />
percolation tension plates, stemflow measurements,<br />
and enclosures . Of these methods only<br />
weighing lysimeters, enclosures, and meteorological<br />
models are capable of yielding hourl y<br />
results . Enclosures alter the microclimate an d<br />
255
may bias the results . Meteorological method s<br />
must be tested in the areas of anticipated us e<br />
(Slatyer and Mcllroy 1961) . Such testing has<br />
not been accomplished in forested areas .<br />
Thus, weighing lysimetry appears to be th e<br />
only method capable of yielding the neede d<br />
short period accurate rates .<br />
Weighing lysimeters have been used to determine<br />
evapotranspiration of agriculture<br />
crops (McIlroy and Angus 1963, Pruitt and<br />
Angus 1960, Harrold and Dreibelbis 1951, Va n<br />
Bavel and Meyers 1962), but they haven't<br />
been used for natural vegetation, such a s<br />
brush and trees, which have extensive root<br />
systems .<br />
The use of weighing lysimeters to deter -<br />
mine evapotranspiration of trees is feasibl e<br />
only if the trees are uniformly spaced such as<br />
in a plantation . Installation is easier when the<br />
root system is naturally restricted, thereby<br />
reducing the size of the lysimeter and it s<br />
deadweight. Under these conditions, it would<br />
be possible to obtain accurate short period<br />
evapotranspiration rates, thus enabling a<br />
mechanistic examination of evapotranspiration<br />
in relation to the determining meteorological<br />
and soil moisture conditions .<br />
Establishment of evapotranspiration from a<br />
single tree or group of trees in a specific location<br />
is important but does not yield answer s<br />
for other types of vegetation in different<br />
climatic zones . Installation of lysimeters in<br />
many locations is not possible and may not be<br />
feasible because of the cost . However, meteorological<br />
methods if tested can be employed to<br />
establish evapotranspiration rates wher e<br />
lysimeters are not feasible. Results fro m<br />
meteorological methods can be tested against<br />
the results from a properly installed weighing<br />
lysimeter. This has been accomplished for<br />
agriculture crops (Tanner 1967, Pruitt 1963 ,<br />
Fritschen and Van Bavel 1963, Fritsche n<br />
1965) . However, differences in scale factor s<br />
such as canopy height, density, and roughnes s<br />
demand additional testing before these<br />
methods can be used over natural vegetation .<br />
The purpose of this paper is to discuss th e<br />
establishment of the weighing lysimeter in a<br />
Douglas-fir forest for the primary purpose of<br />
studying the complex relation between evapotranspiration<br />
rates and the determining<br />
meteorological and soil moisture conditions .<br />
In later stages the installation will be used t o<br />
evaluate meteorological methods for determining<br />
evapotranspiration to be used i n<br />
other areas .<br />
The Site<br />
The lysimeter installation is located on the<br />
Cedar River Watershed near Seattle, Washing -<br />
ton. The soil is a Barneston, gravelly, loamy<br />
sand originating from glacial outwash laid<br />
down at the end of the Vashon glacial period<br />
(Poulson and Miller 1952) and generally restricts<br />
the root system above the 3-foot depth<br />
(Gessel and Cole 1965) . The lateral extent of<br />
the root system is largely restricted to th e<br />
basic spacing of the trees . The area is relatively<br />
level and has a uniform canopy density<br />
making it desirable for micrometeorological<br />
investigations .<br />
The trees are 35-year-old Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga<br />
menziesii) which regenerated naturally<br />
after logging. The average tree spacing i s<br />
5.8 m, resulting in 231 trees per 4,041 m 2<br />
consisting mostly of Douglas-fir with a fe w<br />
hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) and maple .<br />
Trees in the 5 to 30 cm d.b.h. classes occur<br />
with the greatest frequency . Ground vegetation<br />
consists of bracken fern (Pteridiu m<br />
aquilinum), salal (Gaultheria shallon), red<br />
huckleberry (Vaccinium parvifolium), an d<br />
mosses, mainly (Eurhynchium oregonum) .<br />
The Lysimeter<br />
The lysimeter was constructed around th e<br />
root ball of a 35-year-old, 28 m tall an d<br />
38 cm diameter Douglas-fir tree . The lysimeter<br />
consists of two right cylinder containers,<br />
one located within the other . The inner -<br />
most container in which the tree is located i s<br />
366 cm in diameter and 122 cm deep, havin g<br />
a surface area of 10 .5 m 2 (fig. 1). The container<br />
at "field capacity " with tree and soi l<br />
weighs 28,900 kg (fig . 2) .<br />
The inner container is resting on a hydraulic<br />
transducer located on the bottom of th e<br />
outer container. The hydraulic transduce r<br />
consists of eleven 15 m lengths of 6 .35 c m<br />
256
Figure 1 . Walls of the inner container being fitted together<br />
prior to lowering down around the root ball .<br />
Figure 3. Butyl rubber tubing used for weighing coiled<br />
on the bottom of the outer container .<br />
Figure 2 . Completed inner container with soil and tre e<br />
shown raised 90 cm for installation of the hydrauli c<br />
transducer .<br />
butyl rubber tubing with a valve stem vulcanized<br />
30 cm from one end . The tubing was<br />
filled with air-free water and was coiled o n<br />
the bottom of the outer container starting at<br />
the center (fig . 3). Holes were cut in the bottom<br />
of the outer container to allow the valv e<br />
stems to pass through . Thick-walled tubing<br />
(9.5 mm I .D.) was attached to each valve stem<br />
and extended beneath the bottom of th e<br />
outer container to a shutoff manifold . The<br />
manifold is connected to a vertical standpipe ;<br />
thus, the weight of the tree, soil, and inne r<br />
container is reflected in the height of th e<br />
water column in the stand pipe . A water-fille d<br />
dummy standpipe is located adjacent to the<br />
active standpipe for the purpose of temperature<br />
compensation and counter balance .<br />
Weight changes are detected by a ±6 .9 mb differential<br />
pressure transducer located betwee n<br />
the active and the dummy standpipes . The<br />
signal is recorded on an automatic data logging<br />
system .<br />
To provide for drainage of excess water ,<br />
eight filter candles were installed around th e<br />
periphery of the inner container about 10 c m<br />
from the bottom. The filter candles were<br />
5 cm in diameter by 20 cm ceramic tube s<br />
with a bubbling pressure in excess of 25 0<br />
millibars. The filter candles are connecte d<br />
through a manifold system to an evacuate d<br />
reservoir. The outflow from the drainage<br />
system is measured with a modified typ e<br />
tipping bucket rain gauge .<br />
To prevent the tree from blowing or falling<br />
over during and after construction, it wa s<br />
guyed from a yoke located at 10 m to the<br />
base of adjacent trees. After construction four<br />
climbable (30 cm triangular) towers were<br />
built around the lysimeter and the tree guye d<br />
to the towers with horizontal cables. The<br />
cables were loose enough to allow 15 c m<br />
motion at 10 m .<br />
The sensitivity of the lysimeter is 630 g<br />
which is equivalent to 0 .06 mm of water o r<br />
22 ppm. The lysimeter installation at Tempe ,<br />
Arizona (Van Bavel and Meyers 1962), has a<br />
sensitivity of 20 g or 0 .02 mm of water o r<br />
257
7.4 ppm . The lysimeters at Coshocton, Ohi o<br />
(Harrold and Dreibelbis 1951), have a sensitivity<br />
of 2,268 g or 0 .25 mm of water or<br />
38 ppm and the lysimeter at Davis, Californi a<br />
(Pruitt and Angus 1960), has a sensitivity o f<br />
907 g or 0 .03 mm of water or 20 ppm .<br />
The Weather Station<br />
Located adjacent to the lysimeter tree an d<br />
on a tower 33.5 m in the air are the meteorological<br />
sensors of the weather station . Thes e<br />
consist of a solarimeter, a net radiometer, air<br />
temperature sensor, vapor pressure sensor ,<br />
wind direction and speed sensors, and a<br />
tipping bucket rain gauge . In addition to thes e<br />
parameters, soil temperature is measured a t<br />
four depths inside and outside of the lysimeter.<br />
The signal from these sensors is re -<br />
corded automatically on a digital magneti c<br />
tape data logging system. At the present time ,<br />
five of the signals are being integrated continuously<br />
: solar radiation, net radiation, rain -<br />
fall, windspeed, and the drainage from th e<br />
lysimeter. The integrals of these signals an d<br />
the other parameters are recorded on the<br />
magnetic tape at hourly intervals to conserv e<br />
the magnetic tape's supply . With hourly<br />
records, the tape supply will last for 30 days .<br />
The magnetic tape (6 .4 mm) is converted t o<br />
12.7 mm computer compatible tape and the n<br />
analyzed at the University of Washingto n<br />
Computer Center with the Burroughs 550 0<br />
computer .<br />
The Proposed Uses of the<br />
Lysimeter Facility<br />
Since the lysimeter was installed during th e<br />
summer of 1970 and the completed facility<br />
was not completely checked out unti l<br />
recently, very little data is available for discussion.<br />
However, it may be enlightening to<br />
discuss the proposed uses of the facility .<br />
An Evapotranspirimeter<br />
The lysimeter installation is expected to<br />
yield short period rates of evapotranspiratio n<br />
from the 28 m Douglas-fir tree . The accurac y<br />
of the measured evapotranspiration is withou t<br />
much question . How representative the dat a<br />
are is questionable unless the water potential<br />
of the root mass is kept equal to the wate r<br />
potential of the root mass of adjacent trees .<br />
Since the root mass is restricted in a 366 c m<br />
diameter container, the amount of soil avail -<br />
able for water and nutrient extraction by thi s<br />
tree is slightly less than adjacent trees . Durin g<br />
the summer months, water should be with -<br />
drawn from the lysimeter container at a faster<br />
rate than from the adjacent soil . Therefore ,<br />
water will have to be added to the lysimeter<br />
container to maintain a water supply equal t o<br />
that in the adjacent area. During the winter<br />
months, the opposite will be true . The bottom<br />
of the lysimeter container inhibits dee p<br />
percolation . When rainfall exceeds evapotranspiration,<br />
water will have to be removed fro m<br />
the container in order to prevent a buildup of<br />
water in the bottom of the container .<br />
Evapotranspiration as a Function of Potentia l<br />
In order to study the mechanism of transpiration<br />
from a Douglas-fir tree, the evapotranspiration<br />
rates will be determined in relation<br />
to the soil-water potential and the atmosph<br />
eric evaporative demand . During thes e<br />
studies, soil moisture potential will be deter -<br />
mined with a series of thermocouple psychrometers<br />
installed in the lysimeter container .<br />
The atmospheric evaporative demand will b e<br />
calculated from meteorological parameters .<br />
Tissue Volume Change s<br />
Dendrometer bands will be installed at various<br />
locations on the tree to study the swellin g<br />
and shrinking of the tree in relation to water<br />
potential and evapotranspiration . At the sam e<br />
time, stomata aperture and plant stress will b e<br />
determined using leaf resistance meters an d<br />
thermocouple psychrometers or Scholande r<br />
bombs.<br />
Test Cuvette Technique<br />
While the detailed studies of evapotran -<br />
258
spiration are being conducted, cuvettes will b e<br />
installed at various locations within the crow n<br />
to monitor the spacial variation of transpiration.<br />
In addition, the rates of transpiration ,<br />
determined with the cuvettes, will be compared<br />
with the lysimetric transpiration rate t o<br />
determine how representative the cuvett e<br />
technique is for determining transpiration o f<br />
the tree .<br />
Test Meteorological Methods<br />
Meteorological methods such as energy balance,<br />
aerodynamic, and eddy correlation techniques<br />
have been used to determine evapotranspiration<br />
from agriculture crops. The<br />
methods need further testing in forestry be -<br />
fore they can be utilized on a wide scale . Th e<br />
evapotranspiration rates from the lysimeter<br />
tree, if representative of other trees, can b e<br />
utilized for testing the meteorologica l<br />
methods .<br />
Profiles of meteorological parameters suc h<br />
as radiation, temperature, humidity, carbo n<br />
dioxide, and windspeed will be monitored .<br />
These parameters will be utilized to calculat e<br />
the transfer coefficients (eddy diffusivities) o f<br />
sensible heat, latent heat, momentum, an d<br />
CO 2 . In addition, transpiration and photo -<br />
synthesis by layers will be calculated fro m<br />
these parameters .<br />
Canopy Interception of Precipitatio n<br />
Interception of precipitation either as rain ,<br />
dew, or snow will be represented as a weigh t<br />
increase by the lysimeter . The amount of<br />
precipitation intercepted by the crown of th e<br />
tree can be studied by providing a waterproof<br />
cover for the soil surface to prevent th e<br />
throughfall from being recorded as a weigh t<br />
increase . The throughfall will. be measure d<br />
separately . If stemflow is measured, then th e<br />
rest of the weight increase can be attribute d<br />
to canopy interception . It is obvious that thi s<br />
method can be utilized to determine th e<br />
amount of rainfall and snowfall interceptio n<br />
in relation to intensity, duration, and previou s<br />
wettings .<br />
However, this technique may be more useful<br />
in determining the amount of moisture<br />
extracted from the atmosphere as dewfall-at<br />
present, an unknown quantity. During the<br />
summer months, energy budget calculations<br />
demonstrate that Douglas-fir trees, under the<br />
conditions of the site, would be stresse d<br />
within 2 to 3 weeks after the last rainfall if<br />
they transpired at a potential rate, unless transpiration<br />
is supplemented by evaporation of<br />
dewfall. Dewfall may be a very important<br />
parameter in the survival of these trees .<br />
Fertilization and Irrigation<br />
At the present time considerable interest i s<br />
being expressed in using forested areas for disposal<br />
of sewage sludge . The benefit of irrigation,<br />
sludge, or other fertilizers to tree growth<br />
could be tested with the lysimeter installatio n<br />
by comparing the photosynthesis and transpiration<br />
of the tree being studied with th e<br />
adjacent trees .<br />
Summary<br />
During the summer of 1970, a lysimeter<br />
container (366 cm in diameter and 122 c m<br />
deep) was built around the root mass of a<br />
28 m Douglas-fir tree at the Cedar Rive r<br />
Watershed near Seattle, Washington . This container<br />
was placed on top of the hydraulic<br />
transducer which is capable of weighing th e<br />
tree, soil, and container, a mass of 28,900 kg ,<br />
with a sensitivity of 630 g or 0 .06 mm of<br />
water . A weather station was located on a<br />
33 .5 m tower adjacent to the lysimeter tree .<br />
The proposed uses of this installation are :<br />
(1) as an evapotranspirimeter, (2) as a standard<br />
for testing cuvettes, (3) as a standard for<br />
testing meteorological methods, (4) to stud y<br />
evapotranspiration in relation to soil moisture<br />
potential and atmospheric evaporative demands,<br />
(5) to study the shrinking and swellin g<br />
of the plant tissue in relation to evapotranspiration,<br />
(6) to determine interception of<br />
rainfall, snow, and dewfall by the crown, an d<br />
(7) to study the effects of irrigation and fertilizer<br />
upon the growth of the tree .<br />
259
Acknowledgments<br />
The work reported in this paper was sup -<br />
ported by National Science Foundation Gran t<br />
No . GB-20963 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome ,<br />
U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems, International<br />
Biological Program. This is Contribution No .<br />
41 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Colorado River Association. 1966 . Newsletter .<br />
Colo. River Assoc . Los Angeles, Calif. Sept. ,<br />
p. 4 .<br />
Fritschen, Leo J . 1965 . Accuracy of evapotranspiration<br />
determination by the Bowe n<br />
ratio method. Bull. Int. Assoc. Hydrol .<br />
10(2) : 38-48 .<br />
and C . H . M . Van Bavel. 1963 .<br />
<strong>Experimental</strong> evaluation of models of<br />
latent and sensible heat transport over irrigated<br />
surfaces. Int . Assoc. Sci. Hydrol . Pub .<br />
62 : 159-171 .<br />
Gessel, Stanley P ., and Dale W. Cole. 1965 .<br />
Influence of removal of forest cover on<br />
movement of water and associated elements<br />
through soil . J. Soc. Am. Water<br />
Works Assoc . 57 : 1301-1310 .<br />
Harrold, L . L ., and F . R. Dreibelbis . 1951 .<br />
Agricultural hydrology as evaluated by<br />
monolith lysimeters . U .S. Dep. Agr . Tech .<br />
Bull. 1050 : 135 .<br />
Mcllroy, I . C., and D. E. Angus . 1963. Th e<br />
A s p e n d ale multiple weighed lysimeter<br />
installation . Australian Commonwealth Sci .<br />
& Ind. Res. Organ., Div. Meteorol. Phys .<br />
Tech. Pap. 14, p. 30 .<br />
Poulson, E . N., and J. T. Miller. 1952. Soi l<br />
survey of King County . USDA Soil Ser.<br />
1939, No. 31, p. 106 .<br />
Pruitt, W. O. 1963. Application of several<br />
energy balance and aerodynamic evaporation<br />
equations under a wide range of stability.<br />
Final Rep., USAEPG No . DA-36 -<br />
0390SC-80334, p . 107-124 .<br />
and D. E. Angus . 1960. Large<br />
weighing lysimeter for measuring evapotranspiration.<br />
Trans. Am. Assoc. Agric .<br />
Eng. 3(2) : 13-18 .<br />
Slatyer, R. O., and I . C. Mcllroy . 1961 . Practical<br />
microclimatology . Australian Commonwealth<br />
Sci. & Ind. Res. Organ . Various<br />
pagination .<br />
Tanner, C . B. 1967. Measurement of evapotranspiration<br />
. R. M. Hagan, H. R. Haise ,<br />
and T. W. Edminster (eds .), In Irrigation of<br />
agricultural lands. Am. Soc . Agron .<br />
Monogr. 11 : 534-574 .<br />
Van Bavel, C . H. M., and L . E . Meyers . 1962 .<br />
An automatic weighing lysimeter . Agr . Eng .<br />
43 : 580-583, 586-588 .<br />
260
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Initial steps in decomposition<br />
of Douglasfir needles<br />
under forest conditions<br />
Abstract<br />
P. L . Minyar d<br />
Graduate Student i n<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Pathology<br />
Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) needle decomposition was evaluated after 6 and 12 months exposure t o<br />
forest floor conditions by characterizing solubility changes of saccharides, waxes and oils, and cellulose. Th e<br />
results lead to the hypothesis that primary processes of decomposition are initiated on the outside of the needl e<br />
with the solubilization of waxes and, as the waxes are depleted, the cellular constituents are solubilized.<br />
and<br />
C . H . Drive r<br />
Professor of<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Pathology<br />
College of <strong>Forest</strong> Resources<br />
University of Washingto n<br />
Seattle, Washingto n<br />
Introduction<br />
Approximately 4 percent of the biomass of<br />
the Douglas-fir consists of needles (Dic e<br />
1970) containing a portion of the carbon to<br />
be cycled within the ecosystem . Some genera<br />
of the Moniliales have been reported that are<br />
capable of utilizing cellulose and breakin g<br />
down needle waxes to release carbo n<br />
(Macauley and Thrower 1966 ; Martin and<br />
Juniper 1970) . The decomposition of needl e<br />
litter and the release of carbon in a forest is<br />
important in the nutrient cycling processe s<br />
within a conifer ecosystem . In an effort to<br />
study carbon cycling pathways and the par t<br />
played by the processes of the decompositio n<br />
of Douglas-fir needles the following investigation<br />
was conducted .<br />
Primary decomposition is defined a s<br />
changes in solubility of the needle constituents.<br />
Therefore to study decompositio n<br />
techniques were used to detect changes i n<br />
solubility . Simplistically, needles consist of an<br />
outer layer of cutin and waxes and an inne r<br />
cellular layer made up of cellulose and protoplasmic<br />
contents. Needle constituents wer e<br />
divided into three classes : (1) compound s<br />
extractable with hexane (primarily cuticl e<br />
waxes) (Martin and Juniper 1970), (2) those<br />
extractable with hot water (saccharides)<br />
(Campbell 1952), and (3) cellular components<br />
soluble in 1 percent HaOH (hemicellulose )<br />
(Campbell 1952) .<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Needles used in this study were collected i n<br />
the following manner . Screen traps wer e<br />
attached to a tower at random intervals i n<br />
height from just below the crown of the tree s<br />
to ground level . Needles were collected fro m<br />
the traps aseptically, placed in sterile containers,<br />
and transported to the laboratory for<br />
analysis and further study. In addition needle s<br />
from the traps were placed in nylon mes h<br />
bags on the forest floor and allowed to de -<br />
compose. After exposure for 6 and 12 months<br />
the needle samples were analyzed in th e<br />
following manner .<br />
Samples were oven dried for 24 hr . at<br />
105°C and stored in airtight containers unti l<br />
analyzed .<br />
Three 8-g replications of each treatmen t<br />
sample of needles were extracted with boiling<br />
n-hexane in a Soxhlet extractor for 6 hr . and<br />
oven dried for 24 hr. at 105°C to remove the<br />
hexane and weighed . The amount of material<br />
261
extracted was determined by the weight differences<br />
before and after extraction .<br />
Water soluble materials were determined in<br />
a similar manner using boiling water .<br />
As employed by Cowling (1961), a 1 per -<br />
cent NaOH solubility test was used to determine<br />
rate of cellulose decomposition .<br />
In an effort to isolate fungi involved in the<br />
decomposition processes needles were cultured<br />
in two ways : A portion of each sample<br />
was plated on 2 percent malt extract agar and<br />
onto an antibiotic medium consisting of 2<br />
percent malt extract agar plus 1 :30,000 Rose<br />
Bengal and 50 p .p.m. streptomycin. A second<br />
portion of each sample was washed in sterile<br />
water for 2 minutes and the needles plate d<br />
onto these same agars . The plates were incubated<br />
at 26°C for 7 to 14 days. Isolation s<br />
were made from the resulting fungi .<br />
Results<br />
Table 1.-Frequency of occurrence of<br />
genera of fungi isolated from<br />
needle sample s<br />
Months<br />
Genera<br />
0 Phomopsis sp .<br />
Mucor sp .<br />
Penicillium spp .<br />
Trichoderma spp .<br />
Botrytis sp .<br />
Graphium sp .<br />
6 Phomopsis sp . 2<br />
Mucor sp . 3<br />
Penicillium spp . 4<br />
Trichoderma spp . 4<br />
Aspergillus spp . 3<br />
12 Penicillium 4<br />
Trichoderma spp . 4<br />
Mucor sp . 4<br />
1 1 = Very infrequent<br />
2 = Infrequen t<br />
3 = Frequent<br />
4 = Very frequent<br />
Frequency o f<br />
isolation'<br />
Discussion<br />
Several genera of fungi have been reporte d<br />
to exhibit the capability to utilize waxe s<br />
(Martin and Juniper 1970) . From the data i n<br />
figure 1 it appears that fungal action on th e<br />
needle waxes causes these materials to be -<br />
come more soluble in hexane after a period o f<br />
time. There is a large weight loss in hexan e<br />
extractables after a six month period and a<br />
smaller weight loss after 12 months . I t<br />
appears from this trend that during the first<br />
6-month period, waxes are acted on initiall y<br />
during primary processes of decomposition .<br />
This was followed during the second 6-mont h<br />
period by the processes of increasing solubilization<br />
of cellulose and saccharides .<br />
Dice (1970) reported that annual production<br />
of organic matter for Douglas-fi r<br />
litter is 359 kg/ha . The density data in figure<br />
1 shows that at 12 months there is a 60 per -<br />
cent reduction of organic matter or approximately<br />
213 kg/ha .<br />
The fungi listed in table 1 are being studie d<br />
to determine what role they play in th e<br />
physiochemical processes illustrated in figure<br />
1 .<br />
1 . 6<br />
1 . 5<br />
1 . 4<br />
1 . 3<br />
1 . 2<br />
1 . 1<br />
1 . 0<br />
.9-<br />
.8 /<br />
.7 /<br />
. 6<br />
. 5<br />
.4<br />
.3<br />
. 2<br />
. 1<br />
0<br />
6 1 2<br />
M<strong>ON</strong>THS<br />
- DENSITY<br />
- HEXANE ELTRACTAN.ES<br />
- I3T WATER EXTRACTABLES<br />
1% MOM EXTRACTAHLES<br />
1 . 6<br />
1 . 5<br />
1 . h<br />
1 . 3<br />
1 . 2<br />
1 . 1<br />
1 . o<br />
Figure 1 . Density and weight loss of extractables of<br />
Douglas-fir needles after decomposition .<br />
. 9<br />
. 8<br />
. 7<br />
.6<br />
.5<br />
.4<br />
.3<br />
. 2<br />
.1<br />
0<br />
3<br />
262
These preliminary results suggest the following<br />
hypothesis . Initially the primary<br />
processes of decomposition occur on the surface<br />
of the needle with the decomposition o f<br />
waxes, and as the waxes are depleted, the cell -<br />
ular constituents are acted upon .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The work reported in this paper was sup -<br />
ported in part by National Science Foundation<br />
Grant No . GB-20963 to the Coniferou s<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Biome, U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems ,<br />
International Biological Program . This is Contribution<br />
No . 42 from the Coniferous Fores t<br />
Biome .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Campbell, W. G. 1952 . Wood chemistry . L. E .<br />
Wise and E . C . Jahn (eds), 2 : 1343 p . Ne w<br />
York: Reinhold Publ. Corp .<br />
Cowling, E . B. 1961 . Comparative biochemistry<br />
of the decay of sweetgum sap -<br />
wood by white rot and brown rot fungi .<br />
U .S. Dep. Agric . Tech . Bull. 1258 : 2 .<br />
Dice, Steven F . 1970. The biomass and nutrient<br />
flux in a second growth Douglas-fir ecosystem.<br />
165 p ., illus. Ph .D . thesis, on file at<br />
Univ . Wash ., Seattle .<br />
Macauley, B . J., and L. B. Thrower . 1966 .<br />
Succession of fungi in leaf litter o f<br />
Eucalyptus regans . Brit. Mycol . Soc. Trans .<br />
49 : 509-520 .<br />
Martin, J. T., and B . E . Juniper. 1970. Th e<br />
cuticles of plants . 347 p ., illus. New York :<br />
St. Martin's Press Inc .<br />
263
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Seasonal and diurnal patterns of<br />
water status in Acer circinatum<br />
James P. Lassoie<br />
Research Assistant<br />
and<br />
David R . M. Scott<br />
Professor of <strong>Forest</strong>ry<br />
College of <strong>Forest</strong> Resources<br />
University of Washingto n<br />
Seattle, Washingto n<br />
Abstract<br />
Diurnal patterns of water status were monitored in Acer circinatum on clear days during the summer of<br />
1971 . Sap velocity, branch water potential, and relative leaf resistance to water vapor diffusion were used t o<br />
characterize the water status of a typical tree clump . Within the clump studied, air temperature and relative<br />
humidity were measured and used to calculate atmospheric vapor pressure deficits . Daily potential evaporation<br />
and soil moisture were calculated from U.S. Weather Bureau precipitation and air temperature data using th e<br />
Thornthwaite method. Results suggest that the seasonal course of plant water status is dependent upon changes<br />
in soil moisture levels, possible changes in leaf morphology, and differences in diurnal patterns of water statu s<br />
resulting from differences in atmospheric moisture demand .<br />
Introduction<br />
Vine maple, Acer circinatum Pursh, is a<br />
major subordinate species within the Coniferous<br />
Biome ranging from the southern mainland<br />
coast of British Columbia to the coasta l<br />
section of northern California . It is seldo m<br />
found growing with a single stem ; rather, it<br />
grows in clumps, forming a bushy mass . It is<br />
very shade-tolerant and is usually found unde r<br />
a tree canopy (Lyons 1964, Anderson 1968) .<br />
Despite the prevalence of vine maple in this<br />
area, it seems that little is known of it s<br />
physiological processes .<br />
Numerous authors have illustrated the con -<br />
trolling influence of internal water regimes o n<br />
physiological processes such as photosynthesis,<br />
respiration, translocation, and growt h<br />
of forest trees and herbaceous plants (re -<br />
viewed by Crafts 1968, Gates 1968, and<br />
Zahner 1968) . Also, transpiration, resulting i n<br />
water loss from the soil, influences the total<br />
hydrologic cycle and water balance of forest<br />
stands (Rutter 1968) . Therefore, understanding<br />
the water relations of a major subordinat e<br />
species, such as vine maple, may be quit e<br />
important to the study of productivity an d<br />
water balance of forests within the Coniferou s<br />
Biome. This study investigated diurnal pat -<br />
terns of internal water status in vine maple<br />
during the summer of 1971 . Besides supplying<br />
general information on the water relations of<br />
vine maple, the study also supplied basic data<br />
which will be used in the development of a<br />
plant water status submodel for the Coniferous<br />
Biome . The data presented are also<br />
representative of some of the types of data<br />
presently being collected for conifers within<br />
the Biome (Walker et al . 1972) .<br />
265
Methods<br />
The study was conducted at the Allen E .<br />
Thompson Research Center located about 5 5<br />
km southeast of Seattle at an elevation o f<br />
about 120 m in the foothills of the Washing -<br />
ton Cascades . The Research Center is abou t<br />
24 ha in size and is located on the western<br />
portion of the Cedar River watershed, in a<br />
40-year-old second-growth Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga<br />
menziesii (Mirb.) Franco, plantation .<br />
Dominant trees are about 24 m in height .<br />
Principal subordinate species, besides vin e<br />
maple, are salal, Gaultheria shallon Pursh ,<br />
Oregon grape, Berberis nervosa (Pursh) Nutt ,<br />
sword fern, Polystichum munitum (Kaulf.)<br />
Presl., bracken fern, Pteridium aquilinum (L .)<br />
Kuhn var . pubescens Underw., and variou s<br />
species of moss . The climate is typical of lower<br />
elevations in western Washington . The aver -<br />
age temperature in July is 16°C and in January,<br />
3°C ; the average annual precipitation i s<br />
about 145 cm, with the majority falling during<br />
the winter months . The soil is a gravelly ,<br />
sandy loam derived from Pleistocene glacial<br />
outwash. The vegetation, climate, geology ,<br />
and soils in this area have been more completely<br />
described by Cole and Gessel (1968) .<br />
In the vine maple clump investigated, ther e<br />
were eight live stems, averaging about 3 .7 cm<br />
in diameter at breast height. Since the stems<br />
were quite supple, a spreading crown form resulted<br />
with stem lean in all directions . This<br />
straggly, crooked form is common for vin e<br />
maple growing in the shade (Lyon 1964) . The<br />
tallest erect stem in the clump was about<br />
10 m high. The clump was a moderately<br />
heavy Douglas-fir canopy .<br />
The water status of the clump was characterized<br />
by measurements of sap velocity ,<br />
branch water potential, and leaf diffusio n<br />
resistance . Sap velocity of one major stem in<br />
the clump was estimated using a heat puls e<br />
velocity (HPV) meter and techniques described<br />
by Hinckley (1971) . Numerous investigators<br />
have shown that HPV is a valid<br />
indicator of relative changes in the transpiration<br />
rate of forest trees (Skau and Swanso n<br />
1963, Wendt et al . 1967, Hinckley 1971) .<br />
Readings were taken automatically every half<br />
hour and sap velocities calculated as described<br />
by Marshall (1958) . Branch water potentia l<br />
(>Vb) was estimated using the pressure chamber<br />
apparatus and techniques described b y<br />
Scholander et al. (1965) . Many investigators<br />
have successfully used this technique to estimate<br />
VI) of trees in the field (Waring an d<br />
Cleary 1967, Klepper 1968, Hinckley an d<br />
Scott 1971) . In this study, pressure chambe r<br />
readings of at least three twig samples were<br />
taken and averaged for each observation period<br />
during the day. Samples were obtaine d<br />
from shaded portions of the crowns betwee n<br />
the heights of about 0 .5 and 2.5 meters . Eac h<br />
sample had at least two leaves attached to th e<br />
twig. Leaf resistances (RL) to water vapor diffusion<br />
(transpiration) were measured with a<br />
leaf resistance meter and techniques describe d<br />
by Van Bavel et al . (1965) . Resistances wer e<br />
calculated using the meter sensitivity to temperature<br />
relationship described by Van Bave l<br />
et al. Therefore, though the readings prove d<br />
to be adequate in indicating relative diurna l<br />
differences, their absolute magnitudes may b e<br />
in error by a constant amount . Resistances fo r<br />
two or three intact vine maple leaves (obtained<br />
from similar locations as OD samples)<br />
were measured and their values average d<br />
periodically during the day .<br />
Early morning and evening readings wer e<br />
usually impossible because of the very high<br />
resistances involved causing serious errors in<br />
measurement (Van Bavel et al . 1965). Probably,<br />
these high resistances are primarily due<br />
to nearly complete stomatal closure durin g<br />
these periods . Readings of HPV, 1'b, and R L<br />
were taken between about 0600 and 160 0<br />
Pacific Standard Time (PST) .<br />
Within the clump studied, relative humidity<br />
and air temperature (Ta) were measured i n<br />
the shade with a sling psychrometer approximately<br />
every hour between about 0600 and<br />
1600 PST . These data were used to calculat e<br />
the vapor pressure deficit (VPD) of the atmosphere.<br />
Daily potential evaporation (<strong>PE</strong>) and<br />
daily soil moisture (SM) in the top 90 cm of<br />
soil were calculated for July, August, an d<br />
September from precipitation (P) and air temperature<br />
data by the Thornthwaite metho d<br />
(Thornthwaite and Mather 1957) as modifie d<br />
by Machno (1966) . The data used in these<br />
calculations were taken from the clima -<br />
266
I<br />
- 5<br />
-l o<br />
-1 5<br />
HPV<br />
1<br />
10 . 0<br />
I . 6<br />
E<br />
U<br />
7 . 5<br />
5 . 0<br />
1 . 2<br />
0 . 8<br />
2 . 5<br />
.<br />
0 . 4<br />
3 0<br />
Ta<br />
VPO<br />
I 1 L<br />
3 0<br />
2 0<br />
10<br />
1 0<br />
- I<br />
0800 1200 1600 0800 1200 1600 0800 1200 600<br />
Time of Day (PST )<br />
Figure 1 . Daylight patterns of branch water potential (lib), heat pulse velocity (HPV), leaf resistance (RL), ai r<br />
temperature (Ta), and atmospheric vapor pressure deficit (VPD) for July 21, August 22, and September 22 ,<br />
1971, at the Thompson Research Center, Washington .<br />
tological records of the U .S . Weather Bureau<br />
Station at Landsburg, Washington, located<br />
about 3 km west of the Research Center a t<br />
approximately the same elevation .<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
Water status and environment data examined<br />
in this paper represent typical data collected<br />
on clear days during the summer of<br />
1971 . The days presented as examples are<br />
July 21, August 24, and September 22 (fig .<br />
1) . An expected overall pattern for plant<br />
water status on these days is discernible in the<br />
results. During the early morning "predawn,"<br />
the air was cool and fairly humid ; RL was<br />
high suggesting that stomata were relatively<br />
closed ; 'b was high while HPV was quite low .<br />
As the day progressed, Ta increased, thus in -<br />
creasing VPD and intensifying the evaporative<br />
demand . As stomata began to open, probabl y<br />
in response to increasing light levels, R L<br />
values began to decrease . Since VPD had in -<br />
creased and stomata had begun to open, th e<br />
tree began to transpire causing an increase i n<br />
HPV readings. Continued water loss resulted<br />
in a decrease in t/b until about midday . In th e<br />
afternoon, RL increased because of stomatal<br />
closure probably due to decreasing lib . With<br />
this came a corresponding decrease in HP V<br />
and an increase in branch water potential .<br />
The summer was marked by an abnormall y<br />
wet June, with more than 10 cm of precipitation<br />
having fallen. A rainless period followe d<br />
during most of July and August ; only on 1<br />
day, August 21, did P surpass <strong>PE</strong> (fig . 2). Th e<br />
drought ended with a rainy period during th e<br />
first 2 weeks of September . This was followed<br />
by 2 weeks without rain before another stor m<br />
occurred near the end of September . The dry<br />
period during July and August produced a<br />
26 7
1 5<br />
FIGURE 2<br />
1 0<br />
18 0<br />
FIGURE 3<br />
u<br />
160<br />
ILO<br />
-,<br />
- 0<br />
= 120<br />
I00<br />
SM<br />
- 3 . 0<br />
July 6 July 26<br />
Aug 1 5<br />
Time of year (1971 )<br />
Sept L Sept 2 L<br />
Figure 2 . Precipitation minus potential evaporation (P-<strong>PE</strong>) calculated by the Thornthwaite method for July ,<br />
August, and September 1971 at the Thompson Research Center, Washington .<br />
Figure 3 . Soil moisture (SM) in the top 90 cm of soil calculated by the Thornthwaite method and "predawn "<br />
branch water potential (*1y ) ) for July, August, and September 1971 at the Thompson Research Center ,<br />
Washington .<br />
steady drying of the soil from field capacit y<br />
to a water potential well below -1 .0 bar (fig .<br />
3). The rain in early September recharged th e<br />
soil to a point near field capacity . For the top<br />
90 cm of this soil, field capacity is near 17 . 7<br />
cm of water while the -1 .0 bar point is abou t<br />
14.2 cm (Knutsen 1965) .<br />
Since plants obtain water primarily fro m<br />
the soil and lose water to the atmosphere ,<br />
their internal water status will depend greatly<br />
upon the SM supply and the atmospheric demand.<br />
The relationship of plant water status<br />
to SM is illustrated by examining "predawn "<br />
branch water potential (*fib) periodically<br />
throughout the study period . These measurements<br />
were taken just prior to sunrise whe n<br />
'b is usually the highest of the day and<br />
should most accurately reflect soil water po -<br />
tential (Slayter 1967, Klepper 1968, Waring<br />
1969). Therefore, a continuous decrease in<br />
*lPb should have occurred during the rainles s<br />
period in July and August because of the<br />
steadily decreasing SM (i .e ., decreasing soil and<br />
water potential) during this period . Quite the<br />
opposite was observed (fig . 3) . During the<br />
period, "predawn" branch water potential decreased<br />
steadily to a minimum on August 3<br />
and then continually increased through<br />
August . This was surprising as *fib seemed to<br />
respond quickly to any change in SM, as illustrated<br />
by the immediate decrease in I1b during<br />
the temporary rainless period in September.<br />
Also, maximal and minimal points withi n<br />
this general trend proved to be significantl y<br />
different at the 1-percent level (table 1) . The<br />
apparent anomaly is probably explainable i f<br />
268
Table 1 .- Tukey's w Multiple Comparison Test for seasonal "predawn" branc h<br />
water potentials (*fib) showing significant differences at th e<br />
1-percent level. Values underlined are not significantly different.<br />
Date 7/15 9/15 8/24 8/31 8/17 8/22 7/21 7/27 8/ 3<br />
*>!ib 0.8 0.8 1.2 1.0 1 .4 1 .4 1 .4 1 .7 2 . 2<br />
certain plant and environmental changes<br />
which occurred through the summer an d<br />
which decreased daily transpirational wate r<br />
losses are taken into account .<br />
The differences in daily plant water status<br />
which occurred on clear days during the stud y<br />
period would help explain the *0b trend observed<br />
(fig. 1). These differences seemed primarily<br />
due to a general decrease in the atmospheric<br />
demand through the study period (fig .<br />
2) . Generally, higher average Ta's and VPD' s<br />
and higher <strong>PE</strong>'s occurred earlier in the summer,<br />
despite higher SM levels . A higher evaporative<br />
demand produced higher average HPV' s<br />
and greater water loss, thus developing lowe r<br />
branch water potentials . The later part of<br />
August was marked by relatively lower Ta's ,<br />
VPD's and <strong>PE</strong>'s, even though SM had de -<br />
creased. Hence, lower transpirational losse s<br />
occurred and higher 4/b developed . Durin g<br />
this period, a general increase in diffusion resistance<br />
was also evident .<br />
It is also possible that changes in leaf morphology<br />
during the summer could have helpe d<br />
produce a trend of increasing *fib during a<br />
period of continually decreasing SM . Chlorosi s<br />
in leaves, leading to necrosis before abscission ,<br />
has been shown to be induced by drought ,<br />
vascular disease, and normal senescence in<br />
woody and herbaceous plants (Kramer and<br />
Kozlowski 1960, Talboys 1968) . Such manifestations,<br />
characteristic of "drought hardening"<br />
in plants, can produce decreased transpiration<br />
and photosynthesis rates due to persistent<br />
stomatal closure even while leaves are fully<br />
turgid (Talboys 1968, Turner 1969) . By the<br />
middle of August, the leaves of the vine mapl e<br />
clump investigated had developed numerou s<br />
chlorotic spots; necrosis became evident during<br />
September. Therefore, increasing *1Pb during<br />
August could have been influenced by th e<br />
systematic reduction in transpiration in portions<br />
of the leaves .<br />
Conclusion<br />
The diurnal patterns of water status in vin e<br />
maple were examined for clear days during<br />
the summer of 1971 . As expected, the seasonal<br />
pattern of plant water status was de -<br />
pendent upon a combination of certain soil ,<br />
plant, and atmospheric factors which affecte d<br />
water uptake and loss by the plants . Soi l<br />
water potential, which steadily decreased during<br />
the rainless periods, should have progressively<br />
limited water availability and resulte d<br />
in the development of lower "predawn" plan t<br />
water potentials. However, during a continuous<br />
drying cycle, changes in certain plant an d<br />
atmospheric factors seemed to influenc e<br />
water loss greatly . Early in the summer ,<br />
greater water losses occurred due to highe r<br />
evaporative demands, and the plants were<br />
unable to recharge fully during the night eve n<br />
though adequate soil moisture was probably<br />
available . The development of chlorotic spots<br />
suggested that during a prolonged drought, o r<br />
as the leaves approached abscission, the ability<br />
of the entire clump to transpire decreased .<br />
Also, as the atmospheric demand lessened<br />
later in the summer, less water loss occurre d<br />
269
during the day. Therefore, despite low soil<br />
water supply, greater nighttime recharging<br />
was possible because the deficits developed<br />
were less .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The work reported in this paper was sup -<br />
ported by National Science Foundation Gran t<br />
No . GB-20963 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong><br />
Biome, U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems, International<br />
Biological Program . This is Contribution<br />
No . 43 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome ,<br />
IBP .<br />
The authors are also indebted to Mr . Peter<br />
K. McCracken and Mr . Peter S . Machno for<br />
their assistance in various phases of this study .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Anderson, H . C. 1968. Growth from and distribution<br />
of vine maple (Acer circinatum)<br />
on Marys Peak, western Oregon . Ecology<br />
50(1): 127-130 .<br />
Cole, D . W., and S . P. Gessel. 1968. A pro -<br />
gram for studying the pathways, rates an d<br />
processes of elemental cycling in a fores t<br />
ecosystem . Coll. of <strong>Forest</strong> Resour . Contrib .<br />
No. 4, 54 p ., Univ. Wash., Seattle .<br />
Crafts, A . S . 1968. Water deficits and physiological<br />
processes . In T. T . Kozlowski (ed .) ,<br />
Water deficits and plant growth . Vol. 2 .<br />
Plant water consumption and response, p .<br />
85-133 . New York : Academic Press .<br />
Gates, C . T. 1968. Water deficits and growth<br />
of herbaceous plants . In T . T . Kozlowsk i<br />
(ed.), Water deficits and plant growth . Vol .<br />
2 . Plant water consumption and response ,<br />
p. 135-190 . New York : Academic Press .<br />
Hinckley, T. M . 1971 . Estimate of water flo w<br />
in Douglas-fir seedlings . Ecology 52(3) :<br />
525-528 .<br />
and D . R. M. Scott . 1971. Estimates<br />
of water loss and its relation to environmental<br />
parameters in Douglas-fi r<br />
saplings . Ecology 52(3) : 520-524 .<br />
Klepper, B . 1968 . Diurnal patterns of water<br />
potential in woody plants . Plant Physiol .<br />
43: 1931-1934 .<br />
Knutsen, S . K. 1965. Hydrologic processes in<br />
30- to 35-year-old stands of Douglas-fir an d<br />
alder in western Washington . 167 p .,illus .<br />
M .S. thesis, on file at Univ . Wash., Seattle .<br />
Kramer, P. J., and T. T. Kozlowski . 1960 .<br />
Physiology of trees. 642 p., illus. New<br />
York: McGraw-Hill .<br />
Lyons, C . P . 1964. Trees, shrubs, and flower s<br />
to know in Washington . 211 p., illus .<br />
Toronto, Can . : J. M. Dent and Sons .<br />
Machno, P . S. 1966. Water balance and soi l<br />
moisture studies in western Massachusetts .<br />
136 p., illus. M .S. thesis, on file at Univ .<br />
Mass ., Amherst .<br />
Marshall, D . C . 1958. Measurement of sap<br />
flow in conifers by heat transport . Plan t<br />
Physiol . 33 : 385-396 .<br />
Rutter, A. J . 1968. Water consumption b y<br />
forests. In T . T . Kozlowski (ed.), Water<br />
deficits and plant growth . Vol. 2. Plant<br />
water consumption and response, p . 23-84 .<br />
New York : Academic Press .<br />
Scholander, P . F., E . D . Hammel, E . D. Bradstreet,<br />
and E . A. Hemmingsen. 1965. Sa p<br />
pressure in vascular plants . Science 143 :<br />
339-346 .<br />
Skau, C . M., and R . H . Swanson . 1963 . An<br />
improved heat pulse velocity meter as a n<br />
indicator of sap speed and transpiration . J .<br />
Geophys . Res. 68 : 4743-4749 .<br />
Slayter, R . O. 1967 . Plant-water relationships .<br />
366 p ., illus. New York : Academic Press .<br />
Talboys, P . W . 1968 . Water deficits and vascular<br />
disease . In T . T . Kozlowski (ed .), Water<br />
deficits and plant growth . Vol. 2 . Plant<br />
water consumption and response, p .<br />
255-311. New York : Academic Press .<br />
Thornthwaite, C . W ., and J . R. Mather . 1957 .<br />
Instructions and tables for computing potential<br />
evapotranspiration and the wate r<br />
balance . Climatol. Drexel Inst . Technol .<br />
Publ. 10(3) : 1-311 .<br />
Turner, N. C. 1969. Stomatal resistance to<br />
transpiration in three contrasting canopies .<br />
Crop Sci. 9(3) : 303-307 .<br />
Van Bavel, C . H. M ., F. S . Nakayama, and W .<br />
L. Ehrler. 1965 . Measuring transpiration resistance<br />
of leaves. Plant Physiol . 40 :<br />
535-540 .<br />
Walker, R. B., D. R. M . Scott, D . J. Salo and<br />
K . L. Reed. 1972 . Terrestrial process<br />
270
studies in conifers-a review . In Jerry F .<br />
Franklin, L . J . Dempster, and Richard H .<br />
Waring (eds.), Proceedings-Research o n<br />
coniferous forest ecosystems-A symposium,<br />
p. 211-225, illus . Pac. Northwes t<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> & Range Exp . Stn ., Portland, Oreg.<br />
Waring, R. H . 1969. <strong>Forest</strong> plants of the east -<br />
ern Siskiyous: their environmental an d<br />
vegetative distribution . Northwest Sci .<br />
43(1) : 1-17 .<br />
and B. D. Cleary. 1967. Plan t<br />
moisture stress : evaluation by pressure<br />
bomb . Science 155 : 1248-1254 .<br />
Wendt, C. W., J . R. Runkles, and R . H. Haas .<br />
1967. The measurement of water loss by<br />
mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa var . glandulosa<br />
Torr.) using the thermoelectric method<br />
. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 31(2) :<br />
161-164 .<br />
Zahner, R . 1968 . Water deficits and growth o f<br />
trees . In T . T. Kozlowski (ed.), Water deficits<br />
and plant growth . Vol. 2. Plant wate r<br />
consumption and response, p . 191-254 .<br />
New York : Academic Press .<br />
271
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Development and testing of a n<br />
inexpensive thermoelectrically<br />
cooled cuvette<br />
David J . Salo, Department of Botan y<br />
John A . Ringo, Department of Electrical Engineerin g<br />
James H . Nishitani, Department of Botany<br />
an d<br />
Richard B . Walker, Department of Botany<br />
University of Washingto n<br />
Seattle, Washingto n<br />
Abstract<br />
An economical temperature-controlled cuvette system has been developed to monitor CO 2 assimilation an d<br />
dark respiration in the crowns of mature Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) trees at the Cedar River Thompso n<br />
site. Temperatures in the Plexiglas assimilation chambers are controlled with thermoelectric coolers, and CO 2<br />
concentration changes are measured with a differential infrared gas analyzer. Preliminary field data sugges t<br />
cuvette temperatures can be maintained within ±1 °C of ambient even under high insolation conditions .<br />
Introduction<br />
The "cuvette technique" has been used fo r<br />
field assessment of carbon dioxide assimilation<br />
since the 1930's (Bosian 1933), but the<br />
findings of these studies have often bee n<br />
criticized. These criticisms of cuvette methods<br />
have usually resulted from the difficulties of<br />
maintaining a plant-chamber environmen t<br />
closely approximating that outside the en -<br />
closure .<br />
Cuvette Problems<br />
Problems encountered have included th e<br />
development of "deep" boundary layers alon g<br />
leaf surfaces with the concomitant establishment<br />
of abnormal C0 2 , vapor pressure, an d<br />
temperature gradients . Additionally, CO 2<br />
concentrations deviating markedly fro m<br />
ambient levels have frequently occurred an d<br />
water condensation in chambers and in ai r<br />
conducting lines has been of particular con -<br />
cern at night, during cold weather periods ,<br />
and during periods of intense thermoelectri c<br />
cooling of cuvette bases . But probably th e<br />
most difficult problem to overcome has bee n<br />
that of chamber heating during periods o f<br />
high insolation . In efforts to achieve temperature<br />
control under these conditions, a variet y<br />
of chamber designs, fabrication procedure s<br />
and materials, and cooling techniques have<br />
been utilized .<br />
A common practice employed by many investigators<br />
has been the use of various thin<br />
plastic film "skins" to cover cuvette frames .<br />
Bourdeau and Woodwell (1965) used 8 mi l<br />
polyvinyl chloride (PVC), Ritchie (1969) use d<br />
2 mil PVC, and Hodges (1965) used 5 mil<br />
polypropylene . These efforts have met with<br />
varying degrees of success because plastics<br />
differ markedly in CO 2 permeability, as well as<br />
infrared and visible light transmittance . As an<br />
example, though the IR transmissivity o f<br />
polyethylene is relatively good its visible light<br />
transmittance is less than that of either Plexiglas<br />
(methyl methacrylate) or PVC . It is also<br />
273
permeable to both CO 2 and water vapor. On<br />
the other hand, visible transmittance of Plexiglas<br />
and PVC is very good while PVC infrared<br />
transmissivity is better than Plexiglas and glass ,<br />
though not as good as that of polyethylene .<br />
Other methods of reducing temperature<br />
buildups have included the rapid conductio n<br />
(700 - 1,500 1 hr ') of air through assimilation<br />
chambers (Lerch 1965) and the circulation<br />
of water, water-ethanol, or waterethylene<br />
glycol solutions through transparen t<br />
jackets surrounding them .<br />
Lange's (1962) and Ritchie's (1969 )<br />
" Klapp-Kuvettes" were attempts to reduc e<br />
temperature increases by alternately openin g<br />
and closing the chambers during experimenta l<br />
periods. Ritchie observed air temperatur e<br />
buildups of 5° to 7° C and leaf temperatur e<br />
increases of up to 17° C when his cuvette s<br />
were closed. By alternately opening and closing<br />
them, these overtemperatures could b e<br />
reduced by more than 50 percent .<br />
Currently, the most convenient method o f<br />
achieving cuvette temperature control appear s<br />
to be through the incorporation of thermoelectric<br />
coolers into chamber designs . Usin g<br />
the Peltier principle to regulate temperature ,<br />
Siemens Corporation (Erlangen, Germany )<br />
has manufactured a highly reliable and sensitive<br />
temperature and humidity controlle d<br />
system whose utility and flexibility have bee n<br />
demonstrated by Schulze (1970) . However ,<br />
cost per unit prohibits Biome acquisition of a<br />
sufficiently large number for simultaneou s<br />
sampling of CO 2 exchange in different crow n<br />
locations, on different age classes of foliage ,<br />
or on different plants . Therefore, routin e<br />
monitoring must be accomplished with a les s<br />
expensive system, reserving the Siemen s<br />
equipment available for "factors studies ."<br />
Prototype Development<br />
To complete a thorough daily and seasonal<br />
sampling program which will provide sufficient<br />
data to describe assimilation, dar k<br />
respiration, and transpiration in representativ e<br />
individual Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii)<br />
at the Cedar River Thompson site, a syste m<br />
composed of several reasonably priced cooled<br />
cuvettes is considered highly desirable . As the<br />
first step in producing a functional system, a<br />
single prototype "two cuvette-power supply -<br />
temperature controller-fan controller "<br />
package (fig . 1) was fabricated from materials<br />
costing approximately $675 .<br />
Figure 1 . Prototype cuvette, power supply, temperature<br />
controller, fan controller package .<br />
Two 5-liter chambers constructed of<br />
3/8-inch Plexiglas are fitted with 1/8-inc h<br />
aluminum bases, removable tops, and smal l<br />
0-6 volt d .c . fans to mix the air and preven t<br />
boundary layer buildups . The aluminum floor<br />
of each chamber is securely bolted to the col d<br />
plate of an 80 watt Cambion (Cambridge ,<br />
Mass .) Model 7250-1 "Forced Convectio n<br />
Thermoelectric Assembly" (TEA) . The Mode l<br />
7250-1 coolers operate in a range between 0<br />
and 18 volts and 0 to 6 amps (larger TEA' s<br />
are also available) and are powered by d .c .<br />
supplies each of which provides power fo r<br />
two cuvettes, two fans, two temperature<br />
controllers, and two thermoelectric coolers .<br />
Each control circuit has been develope d<br />
around a temperature sensing silicon resisto r<br />
(sensistor) bridge (originally diodes fashione d<br />
from transistors were used as temperature<br />
sensors), the imbalance in which determine s<br />
the current output to the thermoelectri c<br />
device .<br />
274
<strong>Experimental</strong> System<br />
Summer field trials for the cuvette wer e<br />
conducted at the Allen Thompson Researc h<br />
Center during 1971 . The open system (fig . 2)<br />
utilized included an air intake approximately<br />
25 m above the ground on a tower located<br />
3 m from that used as an access to study<br />
trees. Air was drawn to the ground, through a<br />
20-liter "mixing reservoir," to assure uniformity<br />
and prevent "noisy" carbon dioxid e<br />
analyzer output, and then passed through a<br />
manifold for distribution to two Model 506 R<br />
Reciprotor (Copenhagen) pumps . One of<br />
these pumped a comparison airstream to th e<br />
URAS II (Hartmann and Braun, Frankfurt )<br />
infrared gas analyzer housed 46 m away in th e<br />
permanent site building and the other move d<br />
air to the cuvette located at 17 .2 m, back to<br />
the ground, through a flow meter, and then t o<br />
the differential analyzer. The attenuating<br />
reservoir, manifold, pumps, and flow mete r<br />
were located in a shelter at the tower base a s<br />
was the power supply-temperature controllerfan<br />
controller. A Honeywell recorder and the<br />
URAS II, however, were located in the site<br />
building. Two 0 .004-inch copper-constanta n<br />
thermocouples were used for temperature<br />
sensing inside the cuvette and one 22-gage<br />
thermocouple was positioned in a shaded<br />
location outside .<br />
In addition to cuvette data, meteorologica l<br />
data were provided by instruments located o n<br />
the adjacent meteorological tower . Scholander<br />
bomb and pressure infiltrometer (Fry<br />
and Walker 1967) samples were routinel y<br />
taken to provide estimates of water potentia l<br />
and stomatal aperture. These data were correlated<br />
with cuvette and meteorological dat a<br />
collected during each trial . Sampling wa s<br />
carried out at cuvette level and illustrativ e<br />
values reported here represent averages-tw o<br />
to three twigs for Scholander pressures (Ps )<br />
and five to seven needles for stomatal infiltration<br />
pressure (Pstom) .<br />
During preliminary trials, the cuvette temperature<br />
was maintained within at least ±<br />
1 .5° C of ambient under conditions of high<br />
AI R<br />
INTAKE<br />
CUVETTE<br />
-1<br />
PUMPS<br />
MIXING --Lf<br />
RESERVOIR<br />
-r<br />
l~I<br />
_ 1<br />
FLO W<br />
METE R<br />
J 1<br />
1<br />
URASII<br />
FLO W<br />
METER<br />
MANIFOL D<br />
Figure 2 . <strong>Experimental</strong> system used during 1971 field trials .<br />
275
insolation (1 cal cm 2 min-1 ) and generally<br />
control was within ± 1° C . With the recent<br />
installation of aluminum heat sinks on th e<br />
cuvette floor, incorporation of "sensistor "<br />
(Texas Instruments) temperature sensors, an d<br />
additional electronic balancing of the system ,<br />
improvement of this performance is<br />
anticipated .<br />
Representative<br />
<strong>Experimental</strong> Results<br />
Summer data obtained with the prototyp e<br />
system agree with those of other investigators<br />
in suggesting a close relationship betwee n<br />
assimilation, stress, and stomatal behavior. To<br />
illustrate this, results of a single day's run<br />
have been included (fig. 3) .<br />
On August 3 and other clear days sampled ,<br />
light did not appear to limit photosynthesis ;<br />
maximum assimilation rates occurred between<br />
1030 and 1130 hours (PST) ; CO 2 uptake<br />
3<br />
2<br />
EXPT 7I-CR 2<br />
RUN 5 (BRANCH 2 )<br />
8/3/7<br />
37 1<br />
DF<br />
decreased between 1130 and 1230 but wa s<br />
accompanied by continued stress increase an d<br />
only small changes in stomatal aperture ; varying<br />
degrees of afternoon stomatal closure<br />
followed and coincided with further depression<br />
of assimilation and relief of stress .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The work reported in this paper was supported<br />
in part by National Science Foundatio n<br />
Grant No . GB-20963 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong><br />
Biome, U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems, International<br />
Biological Program . This is Contribution<br />
No . 44 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Bosian, G . 1933 . Transpirations-und Assimilationsbestimmungen<br />
an Pflanzen des Zentralkaiserstuhls<br />
. Z. Bot . 26 : 209-294 .<br />
°<br />
° CQ2 ASSIMILATI<strong>ON</strong><br />
(mg CQ2 dry g' hr -' ) °<br />
1 5<br />
10<br />
5<br />
Pstom<br />
`~_~<br />
Ps<br />
erg'°~<br />
[atmospheres)<br />
1 .5<br />
-°~-~ - 1.0<br />
0. 5<br />
0.5<br />
0.0<br />
3 0<br />
\ Re °2<br />
(cal cm miri 1 )<br />
10 _ °-0-0--0-0~<br />
CUVETTE TEM<strong>PE</strong>RATURE ('C )<br />
1 , 1 1 1<br />
06<br />
08 10 12 14 1 6<br />
TIME OF DAY<br />
Figure 3 . Representative data obtained during cuvette field trials .<br />
276
Bourdeau, P. F., and G. M. Woodwell. 1965.<br />
Measurements of plant carbon dioxide<br />
exchange by infrared absorption under con -<br />
trolled conditions in the field. In F. E .<br />
Eckardt (ed .), Methodology of plant<br />
ecophysiology, p . 283-289 . UNESCO .<br />
Fry, K. E., and R . B. Walker . 1967 . A pressure-infiltration<br />
method for estimatin g<br />
stomatal opening in conifers . Ecology 48 :<br />
155-157 .<br />
Hodges, J . D. 1965 . Photosynthesis in forest<br />
tree seedlings of the Pacific Northwest<br />
under natural environmental conditions .<br />
177 p. Ph.D . thesis on file, Univ . Wash . ,<br />
Seattle .<br />
Lange, O . L. 1962 . Eine "Klapp-Kiivette" zur<br />
C0 2 -Gaswechselregistrerung an Blattern<br />
von Freilandpflanzen mit dem URAS . Ber.<br />
Deut. Bot. Ges. 75 : 41-50 .<br />
Lerch, G. 1965 . On the problem of cuvetteclimate<br />
. In Bohdan Slavik (ed .), Water<br />
stress in plants, p. 291-293 . The Hague : Dr .<br />
W. Junk N .V. Publishers .<br />
Ritchie, G. A. 1969. Cuvette temperatures<br />
and transpiration rates . Ecology 50 :<br />
667-670 .<br />
Schulze, E . -13 . 1970 . Der CO2 -Gaswechsel der<br />
Buche (Fagus siluatica L.) in Abhangigkeit<br />
von den Klimafaktoren im Freiland . Flora<br />
159 : 177-232 .<br />
277
Aquatic Process Studies<br />
279
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium.<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Studying streams as a<br />
biological unit<br />
James R. Sedel l<br />
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife<br />
Oregon State University<br />
Abstract<br />
The case for viewing and studying streams from the standpoint of processors of materials and energy instea d<br />
of exporters from the forest is elaborated. The unique opportunity for stream and terrestrial biogeochemica l<br />
investigators to cooperate and be coinvestigators on the same stream systems is explored and specific programs<br />
are identified.<br />
The shift in emphasis from standing crop sampling and instantaneous ingestion and growth information t o<br />
process studies utilizing radioisotope material balance experiments and carbon flux experiments is explained .<br />
Short term experiments using radioisotopes as food markers are described and discussed as to their usefulness in<br />
determining the effect of food quality on ingestion rates and assimilation efficiencies .<br />
11<br />
The Stream as a<br />
Biological Unit<br />
The primary aquatic interface with th e<br />
terrestrial component occurs in small water -<br />
shed streams . There is a general consensu s<br />
that the stream itself probably contribute s<br />
little to the conservation of nutrients (compared<br />
to the total terrestrial system of whic h<br />
they are a part) since relative biomass level s<br />
are low and export is a pervasive feature o f<br />
streams, particularly during freshets . Suc h<br />
ideas, although partially correct, have helpe d<br />
to perpetuate out-moded views advanced by<br />
terrestrial ecologists around the turn of th e<br />
century concerning streams . The opening<br />
paragraph of a paper by Shelford and Edd y<br />
(1929) 1 is sadly appropriate in 1972 :<br />
Modern ecologists . . . have considered<br />
that the development of communitie s<br />
gives the clue to their dynamics and relations<br />
to each other. Most plant ecologists<br />
have usually assumed that there are n o<br />
permanent fresh water communities .<br />
This assumption is based upon negative<br />
evidence . Streams change their locations ,<br />
and it is essentially their abandoned posi-<br />
' V. E. Shelford and S . Eddy. Methods for the<br />
study of stream communities . Ecology 10 : 382-392 ,<br />
1929 .<br />
tions that become ponds and develo p<br />
into land communities . Streams are<br />
permanent as long as the existing climat e<br />
endures, and this is the condition under<br />
which land communities reach a climax .<br />
The state of the art of stream ecology ha s<br />
clearly upheld Shelford and Eddy's hypotheses<br />
that permanent stream communitie s<br />
exist, undergo successional development ,<br />
reach and maintain a relatively stable condition,<br />
and manifest seasonal and annual differences,<br />
i .e., streams are bona fide biological<br />
units. To continue further, streams are highl y<br />
evolved biological units. As Hynes (1970) has<br />
pointed out, almost every taxonomic group of<br />
invertebrates is represented in, on or near th e<br />
substratum of lotic environments . In contrast<br />
to lakes and ponds there are several group s<br />
which occur only in lotic systems and more<br />
which reach their maximum development an d<br />
diversity there . This is quite probably a consequence<br />
of the permanence of streams as compared<br />
with lakes and ponds . Rivers rarel y<br />
disappear so they are not evolutionary trap s<br />
(Hynes 1970) .<br />
The attitudes of terrestrial ecologists<br />
toward streams have not basically change d<br />
since the paper of Shelford and Eddy (se e<br />
footnote 1). A recent symposium at Orego n<br />
State University on forest land uses and<br />
281
stream environments (Krygier and Hall 1971 )<br />
indicates that attitudes toward streams b y<br />
policymakers and foresters may be changing .<br />
However, with the notable exceptions of<br />
Chapman (1966) and Lantz and Hall (personal<br />
communication), the analysis of the<br />
effects of logging on streams seldom consider s<br />
the stream directly from a biological point o f<br />
view .<br />
In perhaps the most complete study on a<br />
watershed to date, the Hubbard Brook <strong>Experimental</strong><br />
<strong>Forest</strong> in New Hampshire (Liken s<br />
et al. 1970, Bormann et al . 1969), the capacity<br />
for streams to alter and process the various<br />
kinds and forms of chemicals was not considered.<br />
The various forms in which nitroge n<br />
enters a stream (organic, both dissolved an d<br />
particulate, and inorganic) and their fate s<br />
have not been carefully explored for eithe r<br />
undisturbed or clearcut watersheds . On e<br />
might expect that more nitrogen is lost to th e<br />
terrestrial portion but retained in the stream<br />
portion of the forest ecosystem than Liken s<br />
and Bormann have shown . Indeed, Fishe r<br />
(1970), working on the same watershed, has<br />
shown that 80 percent or more of the particulate<br />
fraction that enters a small stream is<br />
processed in the stream . Kaushik and Hyne s<br />
(1971) and Triska (1969), in studies on th e<br />
fate and residence times for leaves in streams ,<br />
also indicate that processing and not export is<br />
the dominant process .<br />
Objectives of the Research on<br />
<strong>Andrews</strong> Watershed Streams<br />
The inclusion of streams in the Coniferou s<br />
Biome Study represents a unique opportunity<br />
for stream biologists and terrestrial biogeochemical<br />
investigators to cooperate on an d<br />
investigate the same stream systems, thu s<br />
exploring together long neglected problems .<br />
We have taken advantage of this opportunit y<br />
on the <strong>Andrews</strong> forest streams by emphasizing<br />
major terrestrial-aquatic couplings in our<br />
stream investigations such as : (1) obtainin g<br />
estimates of allochthonous inputs and exports<br />
both particulate and dissolved ; (2) documentation<br />
of successional changes in microflora<br />
and the identification of specific metaboli c<br />
activities carried out during leaf decomposition<br />
; (3) determining the significance of roo t<br />
return of nutrients via riparian vegetatio n<br />
with the aid of radioactive isotopes and mas s<br />
balance experiments; and (4) estimating th e<br />
importance of fish and amphibians as the to p<br />
carnivores in some of the small watershe d<br />
streams .<br />
The long-range objective of the Andrew s<br />
stream program is to elucidate the role of a<br />
stream in the functioning of the watershe d<br />
ecosystem. The inclusion of fish, which ar e<br />
certainly quantitatively significant in some o f<br />
the streams, makes it apparent that the othe r<br />
components and their relationships will b e<br />
defined as well . The determination of how th e<br />
relationships between productivity and structure<br />
at the various trophic levels are altered<br />
by various degrees of land use-in this instance,<br />
logging-will be a prime objective . Because<br />
of the relatively short-term nature of<br />
the research, logged vs . unlogged comparison s<br />
will be based primarily upon simultaneou s<br />
observations over a range of conditions rathe r<br />
than on the conventional before-and-after approach.<br />
The <strong>Andrews</strong> forest provides a wid e<br />
range of conditions from which to sample ; including<br />
virgin watersheds, watersheds wher e<br />
streamsides have been recently logged, and<br />
watersheds where streamside vegetation has<br />
grown after past logging. There are obvious<br />
problems in this comparative approach . We<br />
will have to look at a number of "undisturbed"<br />
streams to establish a sort of natura l<br />
variance in order to distinguish betwee n<br />
natural vs. imposed variation .<br />
The <strong>Andrews</strong> Approach<br />
to Stream Studies<br />
At present the emphasis is focused on th e<br />
role of the biota in the small streams in th e<br />
<strong>Andrews</strong> forest . We are presently determinin g<br />
the structure of the stream, its energy sources ,<br />
and its energy processing components . This<br />
descriptive work is both necessary and tedious<br />
and will continue into year 3 . The method s<br />
and approaches being used are standard for<br />
282
this type of stream work with some modifications<br />
to cover the peculiarities of our specifi c<br />
streams .<br />
A significant problem not being dealt with<br />
in year 2 is the dimension of the dissolved<br />
organic fraction (DOM) and the utilization of<br />
that fraction. The DOM from leaf leachate ,<br />
algal excretion, and soil solution represents a<br />
significant organic pool which turns ove r<br />
quite rapidly, even though a large amount o f<br />
rather refractory matter may be expected . K .<br />
W. Cummins (personal communication), 2<br />
attempting to model woodland streams in a<br />
deciduous forest, estimated that about 50 per -<br />
cent of the total DOM input was reflocculated<br />
into fine particulate organic matter (FPOM) .<br />
This occurred by flocculation around air<br />
bubbles, colloidal settling, and chemical precipitation<br />
. The other half was metabolized by<br />
microbes of which he estimated 50 percen t<br />
passed off as respiratory CO 2 and 50 percent<br />
went into production of microbial FPOM .<br />
The DOM compartment is a vital coupling between<br />
the dynamics of the stream biota an d<br />
such biome investigations as stream hydrolog y<br />
and biogeochemistry .<br />
Little is known concerning the man y<br />
changes in quantity and quality of DOM that<br />
are produced by the biological processes in<br />
and near streams . The functional role of DO M<br />
in stream metabolism is also understoo d<br />
poorly and that information which is availabl e<br />
is essentially circumstantial. Inferences hav e<br />
been drawn from physiological studies o f<br />
bacterial and algal cultures under laboratory<br />
conditions. Technological difficulties hav e<br />
delayed the transition from laboratory t o<br />
field investigations .<br />
The approaches planned, to tackle th e<br />
dynamics of DOM in forest streams, involv e<br />
an investigation of the processes of microbia l<br />
decomposition of allochthonous material ,<br />
measuring the quantity and quality of DO M<br />
involved, and examining the fluxing betwee n<br />
physical and biotic compartments in an d<br />
along the streams .<br />
The variety of stream conditions in th e<br />
2 K. W. Cummins . Narrative for a stream energy<br />
budget model . Unpublished manuscript on file a t<br />
Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University ,<br />
Hickory Corners . 5 p ., 1970 .<br />
<strong>Andrews</strong> watersheds provide excellent situations<br />
in which to measure the types an d<br />
amounts of DOM and hopefully develop a<br />
budget. Integral to the measurements will be a<br />
study of the functional microbial groups involved<br />
in the decomposition of the large<br />
organic material such as leaves, woody pieces ,<br />
and fish carcasses. The expertise of an investigator<br />
with knowledge of the biochemistry of<br />
microbial decomposition will be required .<br />
The necessary techniques for studyin g<br />
stream processes and conceptualizing streams<br />
in general have not as yet been adequately<br />
developed for coniferous systems . However ,<br />
major components with the forest strea m<br />
systems can be identified (fig . 1). Contrary to<br />
the opinion of others in the biome, th e<br />
periphyton and decomposer units can be use -<br />
fully approached as a "black-box ." The complexity<br />
can be used advantageously to measure<br />
disappearance of substrate and release o f<br />
products, and some understanding of ho w<br />
ecosystems work and respond to perturbations<br />
can be gained. Radioactive isotope<br />
experiments will allow us to look at coupled<br />
events and processes in the stream . The<br />
parameters will be determined by the kinetics<br />
of the isotope . We can refine the experiments<br />
to look at what features of the system deter -<br />
mine these parameters and how . Carbon-1 4<br />
and phosphorus-32 will be used in mass<br />
balance techniques developed by Saunder s<br />
(1969) and Saunders and Storch (1971 )<br />
(closed chambers, short-term experiments<br />
with C 14 ) and in situ P 32 techniques developed<br />
by Nelson et al . (1969) and Elwood and<br />
Nelson (personal communication) . 3 Isotopes<br />
of selected elements will be incorporated into<br />
biogenic material such as salmon carcasses an d<br />
the pathways and turnover rates of these elements<br />
following decomposition will be investigated<br />
.<br />
In addition to the decomposition studies<br />
already mentioned, an estimate of the large<br />
woody pieces (greater than 1mm) above, in ,<br />
and near the stream bed will be made . This<br />
will be done in cooperation with terrestrial<br />
biomass investigations on the <strong>Andrews</strong> forest .<br />
3 J. W. Elwood and D. J . Nelson . Measurement o f<br />
periphyton production and grazing rates in a strea m<br />
using a 32 P material balance method . Oikos (in press) .<br />
283
S, - 4ydrolo9i c<br />
S2 = I¢rr¢strIa l<br />
S3 = -A9uattc<br />
- p hysical -Processe s<br />
Figure 1 . Stream system categories and relationships .<br />
284
The primary production and energy source s<br />
estimations will utilize the aforementione d<br />
P32 material balance method . The techniqu e<br />
consists of computing a material balance o f<br />
P3 2 following a 30-60 min pulse release. Total<br />
standing crop and effective stream botto m<br />
area can be calculated by equating the quantities<br />
of P 3 2 per unit area of substrate on th e<br />
stream bottom and per unit weight of periphyton<br />
on these substrates to the total quantities<br />
of P 3 2 retained in the study reach of the<br />
stream .<br />
The retained P3 2 in the stream will be subsequently<br />
lost in both dissolved and particulate<br />
forms through three processes : (1) as P 3 2<br />
is replaced by stable phosphorus throug h<br />
metabolic turnover ; (2) periphyton containing<br />
P 3 2 may be sloughed from substrates and<br />
transported out of the study reach ; and<br />
(3) particulate P 32 released to the stream<br />
from primary and secondary consumers and<br />
drift of consumers .<br />
Rates of change in the various compartments<br />
can be estimated by monitoring th e<br />
P 3 2 in the periphyton and stream water over<br />
time. The production rate of periphyton an d<br />
the grazing rate of periphyton can then be<br />
estimated .<br />
Nutrients could be lost from the stream t o<br />
the riparian portion of the stream study re -<br />
search. The P32 technique allows one to<br />
measure this movement of nutrients from the<br />
aquatic to the terrestrial compartment .<br />
The rationale for carbon flux experiments<br />
are discussed in another paper in this symposium<br />
by Lighthart and Tiegs (1972) . We<br />
will not discuss this approach now, except t o<br />
say that we think the technique can b e<br />
adapted for use in stream research .<br />
An additional study in the year 3 progra m<br />
will be the role of mosses in the stream bed in<br />
fixing energy and cycling nutrients . Their<br />
associated invertebrate fauna make them an<br />
important compartment in the streams<br />
trophic structure .<br />
Studies on the production of benthic in -<br />
vertebrates will be completed . In the analysis<br />
of the data particular attention will have to be<br />
paid to "strategies of survival" used by the<br />
various functional groups of invertebrates .<br />
Population regulation must be expected to<br />
differ quite widely in response to the degre e<br />
of stability of the environment . Freshets in<br />
the <strong>Andrews</strong> forest occur frequently but unpredictably.<br />
Food supplies may disappea r<br />
almost entirely, and animals must be able t o<br />
withstand and recover from very great fluctuations<br />
in numbers . They must be adapted to a<br />
great lack of constancy .<br />
Special attention will be paid to the chironomid<br />
larvae, pupa and adults . This group<br />
which represents the greatest numbers, specie s<br />
and probably biomass of all of the aquati c<br />
insect groups, has been somewhat neglected i n<br />
the first 2 years . Using a foam gathering method<br />
the associated exuvia, pupae, and emergin g<br />
adult midges will be identified and quantified .<br />
W. P. Coffman (University of Pittsburgh) wil l<br />
be consulted on the identity of the midges .<br />
Feeding experiments with the major invertebrate<br />
species will determine ingestion an d<br />
assimilation rates as affected by the qualit y<br />
and quantity of food .<br />
Meaningful data concerning feeding habit s<br />
of selected consumers and the relative nutritional<br />
values of different constituents of th e<br />
periphyton are extremely rare . Gut analysis of<br />
insects are often misleading as to major sourc e<br />
of nutrition due to differential digestion an d<br />
assimilation rates . Sede11 4<br />
has reported a technique<br />
which allows one to determine if th e<br />
type of microflora on the natural substrate s<br />
affect the rates of ingestion of stream invertebrates.<br />
Substrates from the stream are eithe r<br />
differentially sterilized or are surface sterilized<br />
and then reinoculated with an algal ,<br />
bacterial, or fungal community or any combination<br />
of the three treatments . The treate d<br />
substrate is then soaked for 1 to 3 hours in a<br />
stream water solution of Co b 0 . The co" is<br />
adsorbed onto the aufwuchs and the specifi c<br />
activity of the food substance determine d<br />
(mg/cpm) . The Co b ° is a gamma emitter an d<br />
can be easily detected without killing th e<br />
animal. This being the case sensitive experimental<br />
designs can be tried which use th e<br />
individual as a block, thereby eliminatin g<br />
4 J. R. Sedell. Feeding rates and food utilization of<br />
stream caddisfly larvae of the genus Neophylax<br />
Trichoptera : Limnephilidae) using °Co and 4 C. In<br />
~ . J. Nelson (ed.), Symposium on radioecology : Proceedings<br />
of the Third National Symposium at Oak<br />
Ridge, Tenn. May 8-10, 1971 . (In press .)<br />
285
ingestion variation between individuals an d<br />
ingestion variation between periods . By coupling<br />
this method with C 14 labeling of different<br />
compartments of the aufwuchs one can<br />
determine assimilation, and the major source<br />
of nutrition or at least that food which i s<br />
most easily assimilated .<br />
Predator-prey experiments have been de -<br />
signed to examine the roles of macroinvertebrates,<br />
amphibians, and fish in the stream ,<br />
and their influence on the community composition<br />
and numbers of aquatic insects . Th e<br />
higher consumer portion of the study will als o<br />
relate the contribution of allochthonous an d<br />
autochthonous production to the elaboration<br />
of fish flesh and to determine how the relationship<br />
may be altered by logging or other<br />
land management practices .<br />
The role of amphibians in the consume r<br />
dynamics of the stream areas in which the y<br />
are located is being investigated by a member<br />
of the terrestrial consumer group . This effort<br />
will strengthen the aquatic-terrestrial couplin g<br />
studies .<br />
The <strong>Andrews</strong> stream program for years 3<br />
and 4 will be focused on aquatic-terrestria l<br />
couplings . Apart from viewing the stream as<br />
receiving the bulk of its energy from forest<br />
litter, the extent to which the stream delay s<br />
the export of minerals and nutrients or may<br />
return them to the forest is not known .<br />
Stream research during years 3 and 4 will be<br />
geared to provide some of these answers .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The author and stream program are indebted<br />
to J. R . Donaldson who has been a<br />
constant source of personal encouragemen t<br />
and an active proponent of a vigorous strea m<br />
program. Our present stream program is an<br />
expansion of one very ably organized over the<br />
past 2 years by J . D. Hall. Our approach to<br />
studying streams as ecosystems reflects i n<br />
many ways the ideas of K . W . Cummins, wh o<br />
has followed the program and given generously<br />
of his ideas since its inception .<br />
The work reported in this paper was sup -<br />
ported by National Science Foundation Gran t<br />
No. GB-20963 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong><br />
Biome, U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems, International<br />
Biological Program . This is Contribution<br />
No . 45 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Bormann, F . H., G . E. Likens, and J. S .<br />
Eaton . 1969 . Biotic regulation of particulate<br />
and solution losses from a forest ecosystem<br />
. Bioscience 19 : 600-610 .<br />
Chapman, D . W. 1966. The relative contributions<br />
of aquatic and terrestrial primary producers<br />
to the trophic relations of strea m<br />
organisms . In K . W . Cummins, C . A. Tryon ,<br />
Jr., and R . T. Hartmen (eds .), Organismsubstrate<br />
relationships in streams, p .<br />
116-130 . Spec . Publ. No. 4, Pymatuning<br />
Lab. Ecol., Univ. of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh .<br />
Fisher, S . G. 1970 . Annual energy budget of a<br />
small stream ecosystem : Bear Brook, West<br />
Thorton, New Hampshire. 97 p . Ph.D .<br />
thesis on file, Dartmouth Coll., Hanover .<br />
Hynes, H. B. N . 1970. The ecology of running<br />
waters . 555 p. Toronto, Can . : Univ .<br />
Toronto Press .<br />
Kaushik, N . K., and H . B . N . Hynes . 1971 .<br />
The fate of the dead leaves that fall int o<br />
streams. Arch. Hydrobiol . 68 : 465-515 .<br />
Krygier, J. T., and J. D . Hall. 1971 . <strong>Forest</strong><br />
land uses and stream environment, proceedings<br />
of a symposium at Oregon State University,<br />
Oct. 19-21, 1970 . 252 p . Continuing<br />
Education Publication, Corvallis, Oreg .<br />
Lighthart, Bruce, and Paul E . Tiegs. 1972 . Exploring<br />
the aquatic carbon web . In Proceedings-research<br />
on coniferous forest ecosystems-a<br />
symposium, p . 289-300, illus .<br />
Pac. Northwest <strong>Forest</strong> & Range Exp . Stn . ,<br />
Portland, Oreg.<br />
Likens, G . E., F. H. Bormann, N . M . Johnson ,<br />
and others. 1970. Effects of forest cuttin g<br />
and herbicide treatment on nutrient budgets<br />
in the Hubbard Brook watershed ecosystem<br />
. Ecol . Monogr . 40 : 23-47 .<br />
Nelson, D. J., N. R. Kevern, J . L . Wilhm, an d<br />
N. A. Griffith. 1969. Estimates of periphyton<br />
mass and stream bottom area usin g<br />
phosphorus-32 . Water Res . 3 : 367-373 .<br />
286
Saunders, G . W. 1969 . Some aspect of feeding<br />
in zooplankton, p . 556-573 . In Eutrophication<br />
: causes, consequences, correctives .<br />
Natl . Acad . Sci., Washington, D .C .<br />
and T. A. Storch. 1971 . Coupled<br />
oscillatory control mechanism in a plank -<br />
ton system. Nature New Biol . 230 : 58-60 .<br />
Triska, F. J. 1970. Seasonal distribution of<br />
aquatic hyphomycetes in relation to the disappearance<br />
of leaf litter from a woodlan d<br />
stream . 189 p. Ph .D. thesis on file, Univ.<br />
Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh .<br />
287
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Exploring the<br />
aquatic carbon web<br />
Bruce Lighthart and Paul E . Tiegs l<br />
Western Washington State Colleg e<br />
Bellingham, Washington 9822 5<br />
Abstract<br />
An aquatic carbon web containing the six compartments dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), phytoplank ton,<br />
zooplank ton, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), detritus, and chemoorganotrophic bacteria is discussed . Tentativ e<br />
methods are presented for measuring the pool size and kinetics about each compartment at one depth in the epiand<br />
hypo-limnions during the four seasons in Lake Washington, Lake Sammamish, Lake Chester Morse, an d<br />
Lake Findley.<br />
Introduction<br />
It is a primary concern to man to be able t o<br />
prepare predictive mathematical models of<br />
organic forms in aquatic systems if he is going<br />
to understand and ultimately develop the<br />
tools to wisely manage his water resources . To<br />
prepare such models, it is desirable to evaluate<br />
the pool size (standing stock) and flux (kinetics)<br />
of energy (Lindeman 1942) in all the<br />
fractions or compartments of the system .<br />
Models may be based on measurements o f<br />
energy or of several materials, e .g., carbon ,<br />
phosphorous, and nitrogen ; however, both<br />
approaches are fraught with technical difficulties.<br />
Of the materials named, carbon i s<br />
recommended because it is a major component<br />
of all organic matter and is cycle d<br />
through a relatively well known web in th e<br />
biosphere . In addition, it is possible to follo w<br />
its movement with c" and other simpl e<br />
analytical techniques .<br />
In the aquatic realm, the carbon web ma y<br />
be thought to form a cyclical system made u p<br />
of a series of interrelated compartments . I n<br />
this discussion the carbon web will be limite d<br />
to a consideration of carbon in the followin g<br />
compartments (fig . 1): (1) Dissolved inorgani c<br />
carbon (DIC), (2) Phytoplankton, (3) Zoo -<br />
plankton, (4) Detritus, (5) Dissolved organi c<br />
carbon (DOC), and (6) Chemoorganotrophi c<br />
bacteria (Stonier et al . 1963). The cycle is<br />
initiated when dissolved inorganic carbo n<br />
species such as bicarbonate (or other chemical<br />
species in the aquatic carbonate syste m<br />
(Stumm and Morgan 1970)) are fixed durin g<br />
the photosynthetic process into organic<br />
matter by the photosynthetic organism (primarily<br />
phytoplankton and secondarily photo -<br />
synthetic bacteria) . Phytoplankton form the<br />
first link in the carbon food chain and ar e<br />
either eaten by herbivorous zooplankton, die<br />
and become part of the detritus compartment,<br />
or excrete dissolved organic carbo n<br />
(DOC). As much as 80 percent of the algal<br />
photosynthate may be excreted as glycolic<br />
acid and other compounds into the wate r<br />
(Hutchinson 1957, Fogg 1963, 1965, Hoo d<br />
1970). Subsequently, microorganisms may<br />
take up the DOC transported by the turbulen t<br />
water and metabolize it to inorganic carbo n<br />
forms. Saunders (1957, 1971) and Saunder s<br />
and Storch (1971) have found that th e<br />
h eterotrophic bacteria and phytoplankto n<br />
form a coupled oscillating pair in which th e<br />
bacteria increase in activity during the day in<br />
response to the daylight production and re -<br />
lease of the algal photosynthate into the surrounding<br />
waters . The herbivorous zooplankton<br />
(and carnivorous zooplankton) also<br />
1 Bruce Lighthart is Director, Institute for Fresh- ,<br />
water Studies, and Assistant Professor, Department of<br />
Biology . Paul E . Tiegs is with Institute for Freshwater<br />
Studies .<br />
289
ATMOSPHERI C<br />
CARBO N<br />
DIOXIDE<br />
■<br />
DISSOLVED<br />
INORGANI C<br />
PH'TOPLAN KTQN ` (<br />
_ BACTERI A<br />
290
contribute to detrital compartment as a resul t<br />
of their fecal deposits or their death and decomposition.<br />
Ultimately DOC and detrital<br />
carbon are decomposed by bacteria or zoo -<br />
plankton feeding on bacteria/detritus mixtures,<br />
to dissolved inorganic carbon as a result<br />
of respiratory oxidative decompositio n<br />
processes .<br />
In nature the standing stock in each compartment<br />
is the dynamic equilibrium level<br />
attained as a result of input/output rate s<br />
about the compartment . The quality of th e<br />
standing stock will also vary as the input /<br />
output mechanisms change .<br />
With the advent of the carbon-14 tracer<br />
techniques, the transports of carbon to and<br />
from each compartment in an aquatic ecosystem<br />
is possible . For example, Steemann-<br />
Nielsen (1952) initiated such studies with C' 4<br />
bicarbonate to estimate the rate of primar y<br />
production in the ocean . Goldman (1963 )<br />
outlined the use of this method in fres h<br />
water .<br />
Sorokin (1966), Shuskina and Monako v<br />
(1969), and Johannes and Satomi (1967) use d<br />
labeled phytoplankton to determine the rat e<br />
at which zooplankton feed and process thei r<br />
waste . The production of dissolved organic<br />
carbon (DOC) by phytoplankton (Fogg 1965,<br />
Saunders and Storch 1971) and uptake by<br />
zooplankton and bacteria have been success -<br />
fully measured using carbon-14 tracers.<br />
Hobbie and Wright (1965) and Wright an d<br />
Hobbie (1966) refined the enzyme saturatio n<br />
technique of Parson and Strickland (1962) a s<br />
measured by a carbon-14 tracer, to evaluat e<br />
the pool size and potential flux of dissolve d<br />
organics through the bacterial (heterotrophic )<br />
compartment in the aquatic web . With<br />
carbon-14 labeled detritus Sorokin (1966 )<br />
measured assimilation by zooplankton . H e<br />
prepared the detritus by homogenizing radio -<br />
actively labeled algal cultures . Others hav e<br />
used autoclaved, labeled natural and culture d<br />
algal populations 2 (Bell and Ward 1970) .<br />
Labeled detritus may also be prepared, b y<br />
foam separating C-14 labeled dissolve d<br />
organics from the liquid phase (Baylor an d<br />
Sutcliff 1963) . However, there is evidenc e<br />
2 G . W. Saunders, personal communication .<br />
that this method will work only in sea water .<br />
For the first time, Saunders 3 recently combined<br />
the aforementioned methods to measure<br />
simultaneously all of the previously liste d<br />
carbon fractions and their fluxes in a "Compartment<br />
Analysis" scheme (Patten 1968 ,<br />
Atkins 1969). He has made this type of<br />
analysis at one location and one instant in<br />
time at several lakes .<br />
Compartment Analysis, in essence, is performed<br />
by establishing a series of known fractions<br />
or compartments in an experimenta l<br />
confine (e .g., glass carboy or plastic bag) and<br />
following a tracer such as carbon-14 as a func -<br />
tion of time as it proceeds through each compartment<br />
in the confined system . Measurement<br />
of the radioactive carbon as it passe s<br />
through each compartment can be used t o<br />
evaluate the rate of incorporation of carbo n<br />
into each compartment in succession, and b y<br />
isotopic dilution or total carbon conten t<br />
analysis, the pool size estimated . These data<br />
may be used to describe mathematically th e<br />
carbon change in compartments as a functio n<br />
of time, e .g .,<br />
d( q 1) _ - k l q l and<br />
dt<br />
d( q 2 )<br />
dt =k l q 1 -k 2 q 2<br />
where (4 1 and q 2 are the specific activities o f<br />
the first and second compartments and k l<br />
and k2 are the rate constants into each compartment.<br />
The compartments could very wel l<br />
be phytoplankton and zooplankton or DOC ,<br />
bacteria and zooplankton, etc. The specifi c<br />
activities rather than tracer amounts will b e<br />
used in mathematical models .<br />
It must be emphasized that the confinement<br />
of an aliquot of the sampled water during<br />
the compartment analysis will yield value s<br />
prevailing for (1) standing stock at the time o f<br />
sample confinement, and (2) uptake value s<br />
for that particular sample during the incubation<br />
period . Thus, it is very important whe n<br />
and where test water samples are chosen . For<br />
example, if lake water were collected for a<br />
compartment analysis of the carbon fraction s<br />
during maximum expected respiratory and<br />
3 Unpublished data .<br />
291
photosynthetic activity with respect to sea -<br />
son, time of day, and depth, one might expec t<br />
measurements to approach the maximu m<br />
values that these variables would attain in<br />
situ .<br />
Reviews and key papers concerning variou s<br />
aspects of the carbon cycle in the aquati c<br />
realm include the following : zooplankto n<br />
physiology (Corner and Coney 1968), primary<br />
productivity (Ryther 1963, Steemann -<br />
Nielsen 1963, and Strickland 1965), dissolve d<br />
organic carbon (Provisoli 1963, Duursma<br />
1965 ), detritus (Parsons 1963), bacteria<br />
(Wood 1965, Brock 1966, and Lighthart<br />
1969), and food chains (Riley 1963) . Also<br />
some detailed methods are given in IBP Hand -<br />
books 12 and 17, Primary Production i n<br />
Aquatic Environments and Secondary Productivity<br />
in Fresh Waters (Edmondson and<br />
Winberg 1971) .<br />
To this point, the discussion has been wit h<br />
what might be called a primary system, the<br />
components in the carbon web . This system is<br />
controlled by another [or] secondary system ,<br />
the physical and chemical environment . Som e<br />
of the environmental factors operating on th e<br />
primary system are listed in table 1 .<br />
Because factors in the secondary syste m<br />
regulate changes in the primary system, meas -<br />
urements of the primary system may allow u s<br />
to interpret the major controlling variables o f<br />
the water bodies .<br />
Table 1 .-Some environmental factors operating<br />
on the aquatic carbon we b<br />
Temperature<br />
Light intensity, quality, and duration<br />
pH<br />
Trace elements<br />
External inputs of organic matter ,<br />
i.e ., nutrients, antibiotics, and<br />
growth factors<br />
Phosphorou s<br />
Silica<br />
Calciu m<br />
Environmental confine s<br />
Water circulation<br />
Purpose<br />
It is proposed that, when possible, one station<br />
will be occupied on each of four lakes i n<br />
the Cedar River watershed : Lake Washington ,<br />
Lake Sammamish, Lake Chester Morse, an d<br />
Lake Findley, during the four seasons of th e<br />
year. While occupied, the flux and pool size s<br />
of six carbon compartments will be measured<br />
in the epi- and hypo-limnions . The purpose of<br />
this investigation is to determine whether the<br />
four lakes are distinguishable in terms of the<br />
fluxes and pool sizes of the six carbon compartments<br />
with the methods outlined below .<br />
Methods<br />
Carbon pools in each compartment will b e<br />
made by : (1) estimating the protoplasmic<br />
carbon pool from cell volume, and (2) from<br />
infrared spectrophotometric measurement o f<br />
oxidized cellular carbon . Carbon flux between<br />
compartment pools will be estimated by<br />
following the transfer of carbon-14 added to<br />
specific compartments .<br />
Carbon Pool Analysi s<br />
It is necessary to determine the "cold "<br />
carbon pool size, both to evaluate its standin g<br />
stock, and in calculating specific activities .<br />
Inorganic carbon in the lake water will b e<br />
measured either by determining the tota l<br />
alkalinity (American Public Health Association<br />
1971), pH, and temperature, and the n<br />
consulting the appropriate tables (Saunders e t<br />
al. 1962) for total available inorganic carbon ,<br />
or by direct measurement using an infrared<br />
CO 2 analyzer (Menzel and Vaccaro 1964) .<br />
The dissolved organic carbon in the water<br />
samples will be determined on the filtrate of a<br />
O.22µ Millipore filtered sample of the test<br />
water using the method of Menzel and Vaccaro<br />
(1964) . Carbonates will be driven off th e<br />
filtrate prior to analysis by sparging th e<br />
phosphoric-acid-acidified filtrate with nitrogen<br />
gas .<br />
The carbon content of the planktonic algae<br />
will be made either from dry weight estimation<br />
by calculation from cell counts an d<br />
29 2
volume measurement, realizing that the protoplasm<br />
has a specific gravity of 1 .1, and is<br />
80-percent water, the carbon content is 5 0<br />
percent of the dry weight (Lund 1965) ; or by<br />
regression with chlorophyll-a measuremen t<br />
(Steemann-Nielsen and Jorgenson 1968) ; or<br />
by both .<br />
(1)<br />
Algal carbon<br />
(protoplasmic volume) X<br />
(protoplasmic specific gravity )<br />
X (protoplasmic P .C. water<br />
content) X (P.C. dry weight<br />
carbon)<br />
Zooplankton carbon will be measured using<br />
the Menzel and Vaccaro (1964) method of<br />
individually picked or 15012 mesh net filtered<br />
samples .<br />
Bacterial carbon will be estimated as th e<br />
product of cell volume (assumed 0 .5 X 112 )<br />
times cell density (1 .1) times water content<br />
(80 percent) times the dry weight carbon con -<br />
tent (50 percent dry weight) of fluorescence<br />
(Strugger 1948) phase contrast microscope<br />
enumerated cells .<br />
Detritus carbon will be evaluated as the<br />
sum of the bacterial and algal dry weight, an d<br />
seston ash weights, subtracted from the total<br />
seston dry weight . The weight of the total<br />
seston will be determined via combustion o f<br />
quadruplicate 0.812 tared glass fiber filtere d<br />
and dried water samples less zooplankton . It<br />
is assumed that 50 percent of the volatil e<br />
seston is carbon (equation 2) .<br />
(2)<br />
Detritus carbon (seston D.W. - zooplankton) -<br />
(algas D .W. + bacterial D.W. +<br />
seston ash weight) X (P .C .<br />
seston D .W. carbon )<br />
Detritus carbon analysis will be attempted<br />
by infrared analysis of combusted total sesto n<br />
after the zooplankton have been remove d<br />
(equation 3) .<br />
(3 )<br />
Detritus carbon = (total seston carbon -<br />
zooplankton) - (algal carbo n<br />
+ bacterial carbon )<br />
Carbon Flux Analysis<br />
Carbon flux will be measured as the trans -<br />
Table 2.-List of compartment systems isolated for carbon flux measurements<br />
Bottle Added tracer Compartment system<br />
1 NaH 14 CO 3 Dissolved inorganic carbon<br />
Phytoplankto n<br />
Dissolved organic carbo n<br />
2 C-starch (U14 ) Dissolved organic carbo n<br />
with or without<br />
Bacteri a<br />
algal hydraulysate<br />
Dissolved inorganic carbon<br />
3 NaH 14 CO 3 Dissolved inorganic carbo n<br />
Phytoplankto n<br />
Zooplankto n<br />
4 <strong>Experimental</strong>ly Dissolved organic carbo n<br />
generated<br />
Bacteri a<br />
DOC-Cl 4<br />
Zooplankto n<br />
(Dissolved inorganic carbon) ?<br />
5 <strong>Experimental</strong>ly Detritu s<br />
generated<br />
Zooplankto n<br />
Detritus-C 14<br />
(Dissolved inorganic carbon)?<br />
29 3
18L SAMPLE LAKE WATER<br />
LIGH T<br />
ACIDIFIED TO pH 3<br />
WITH H 3 P04 AN D<br />
SPARGE WITH N 2<br />
1<br />
ADD ALIQUOT T O<br />
COCKTAIL AND COUNT<br />
Figure 2. Flow diagram of methods to be used to determine carbon flux from DIC to phytoplankton to DOC ,<br />
and detritus to zooplankton .<br />
294
fer of the indicated carbon-14 tracer labele d<br />
substrate through the isolated systems tabulated<br />
in table 2 . Each of the five systems will<br />
be isolated in either glass carboys, if it is a<br />
light-requiring system, or in blacked plasti c<br />
collapsible bottles, if a dark system. Th e<br />
bottles will be incubated in situ .<br />
The flux of carbon from DIC to DO C<br />
through the phytoplankton will be determined<br />
as the uptake during a daylight perio d<br />
of a carbonate spike added to a glass carboy<br />
of lake water incubated in situ . The zooplankton<br />
will be filtered out of this water with a<br />
0.1 mm mesh Nitex net and used in anothe r<br />
experiment. Samples will be withdraw n<br />
hourly from the submerged bottle through a<br />
tube to the water surface . The Millipore filtered<br />
(0 .22/1 porosity) samples will be used t o<br />
separate the phytoplankton from the filtrate .<br />
The filtrate containing the DOC c", after<br />
acidification and nitrogen sparging, will b e<br />
dried in a scintillation vial and counted afte r<br />
moistening . Algal respiration will also b e<br />
evaluated either as the slope of the phytoplankton<br />
carbon-14 loss immediately afte r<br />
darkening the bottle, or in separate classica l<br />
light/dark bottle measurements (fig. 2) .<br />
Upon completion of the foregoing experiment,<br />
a portion of that carboy of lake wate r<br />
will be used to evaluate the carbon flux fro m<br />
DOC generated by the phytoplankton in it, t o<br />
DIC via bacteria . This water will be cleared of<br />
organism and labeled DIC by first Millipor e<br />
filtration and then nitrogen sparging . Subsequently,<br />
fresh lake water , less its zooplankto n<br />
from the original sample site will be added to<br />
the " clean " hot-DOC containing water<br />
incubated in situ in the dark. Particulate (i .e . ,<br />
bacteria) and DIC containing activity in th e<br />
bottle will be monitored for a further 2 4<br />
hours (fig. 3) .<br />
The zooplankton initially filtered from th e<br />
water for the DIC to algae to DOC experiment<br />
(the first experimental description) wil l<br />
be added to a darkened plastic carboy containing<br />
sterile radioactive detritus so the<br />
carbon flux from the detritus to zooplankton<br />
and possibly to DIC compartments may b e<br />
measured . After 4 and 8 hours, one-half of<br />
the carboy will be filtered and the animal s<br />
counted numerically and radioactively. The<br />
three zooplankton data points so obtained<br />
will be graphed to evaluate the uptake rate<br />
(fig. 2) .<br />
The exact method of sterile detritus production<br />
awaits further experimentation to<br />
evaluate the chemical composition and<br />
optimum zooplankton feeding rate on<br />
detritus produced in several ways .<br />
The flux measurement of carbon fro m<br />
phytoplankton to zooplankton will be evaluated<br />
in a lighted glass carboy like the on e<br />
described for DIC to algae to DOC measurements<br />
except that the zooplankton will no t<br />
be removed from the water . Hourly phytoplankton<br />
samples, and 4- and 8-hour sample s<br />
of one-half the vessel will be filtered for<br />
subsequent numerical and radiological zoo -<br />
plankton counts . The mean specific activity<br />
of the phytoplankton food source for th e<br />
zooplankton may be evaluated as the mea n<br />
specific activity of algal carbon during th e<br />
experiment (fig . 4) .<br />
Finally, the flux of dissolved organic<br />
carbon through bacteria to zooplankton wil l<br />
be determined as the rate of carbon 1 4<br />
labeled DOC (i .e., starch and/or C 14 labeled<br />
algal protein hydraulysate) uptake by th e<br />
bacteria (particles passing through a 0 .1 Nitex net) incubated in situ in a<br />
darkened plastic carboy of lake water.<br />
Samples will be withdrawn hourly for th e<br />
bacterial-uptake and one-half the carboy filter<br />
after 4 and 8 hours for the zooplankto n<br />
measurements. Zooplankton will be filtere d<br />
out onto a 0 .1-mm mesh Nitex net (fig . 5) .<br />
All carbon-14 measurements will be made<br />
on a Packard Tri-Garb Model 3375 scintillation<br />
counter using the channel s ' ratio method .<br />
Schindler's (1966) method for phytoplankton,<br />
and Ward et al .'s (1970) method for zoo -<br />
plankton, detritus, and bacteria will be used .<br />
More details of proposed methods may be<br />
found in Edmondson and Winberg (1971) ,<br />
and Parsons and Strickland (1965) .<br />
The numerical methods that will be used i n<br />
the analysis of the data generated by thi s<br />
study will be presented in future communications,<br />
but are anticipated to include : (a) statistical<br />
evaluation of the differences betwee n<br />
flow and pool sizes of the biome test lakes as<br />
295
1500 m l<br />
LAKE WATER<br />
2 L FRO M<br />
PHYTOPLANKTO N<br />
EX<strong>PE</strong>RIMEN T<br />
Figure 3. Flow diagram of methods to be used to determine carbon flux from DOC to bacteria to DIC .<br />
296
18L LAKE WATER<br />
LIGH T<br />
50m1 HOURLY<br />
DURING DAYLIGHT<br />
1/2 CARBOY AT<br />
4 AND 8 HOUR S<br />
WASH GUTS 1 H R<br />
IN JUST TURBI D<br />
YEAST SUS<strong>PE</strong>NSI<strong>ON</strong><br />
NUMERICA L<br />
(AND/OR SEPARATE S<strong>PE</strong>CIES )<br />
AND RADIOACTIVE COUNT S<br />
ZOOPL AN KTO N<br />
Figure 4. Flow diagram of methods to be used to determine carbon flux from DIC to phytoplankton t o<br />
zooplankton .<br />
297
18L LAKE WATE R<br />
PRESERVE WIT H<br />
FORMALI N<br />
SPARGE WITH N 2<br />
10 MINUTES<br />
DRY ALIQUOT, AD D<br />
COCKTAIL AND COUN T<br />
D .O .C .<br />
NUMERICAL<br />
(AND OR SEPARATE S<strong>PE</strong>CIES )<br />
AND RADIOACTIVE COUNT S<br />
ZOOPLANKTO N<br />
Figure 5 . Flow diagram of methods to be used to determine carbon flux from DOC to bacteria to zooplankton .<br />
298
a function of time and space, (b) carbo n<br />
balances within the web and between the tw o<br />
test depths station, (c) carbon transfer efficiencies<br />
between compartments, (d) synthesis<br />
of our data together with other biome measurements<br />
that have small time and space<br />
resolutions, and (e) carbon flow and pool size<br />
input to mathematical models in preparation .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The authors want to thank Professor Freid a<br />
B. Taub for her active encouragement of this<br />
study, and Dr. G. W. Saunders, Jr., whos e<br />
work generated this scheme of methods out -<br />
lined in this paper .<br />
The work reported in this paper was sup -<br />
ported in part by National Science Foundation<br />
Grant No . GB-20963 to the Coniferous<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Biome, U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems ,<br />
International Biological Program . This is Contribution<br />
No . 46 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong><br />
Biome and Contribution No . 16, Institute for<br />
Freshwater Studies, Western Washington State<br />
College .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
American Public Health Association. 1971 .<br />
Standard methods for the examination o f<br />
water and waste waters . 874 p . Washington ,<br />
D .C .<br />
Atkins, G . L . 1969. Multicompartmen t<br />
models for biological sciences . 153 p .<br />
London: Methulen and Co . Ltd .<br />
Baylor, E . R., and W . H. Sutcliff, Jr . 1963 .<br />
Dissolved organic matter in seawater as a<br />
source of particulate food . Limnol .<br />
Oceanogr. 8(4) : 869-871 .<br />
Bell, R. K., and F . J. Ward, 1970 . Incorporation<br />
and organic carbon by Daphnia pulex .<br />
Limnol. Oceanogr. 15(3) : 713-726 .<br />
Brock, R. D. 1966. Principles of microbia l<br />
ecology. 306 p. Englewood Cliffs, N .J . :<br />
Prentice-Hall .<br />
Corner, E. D. S., and C . B. Coney . 1968 . Biochemical<br />
studies on the production of<br />
marine zooplankton . Biol. Rev. 4(3) :<br />
393-426 .<br />
Duursma, E . D. 1965. The dissolved organic<br />
constituents of sea water . In J. P. Rile y<br />
(ed.), Chemical oceanography, 433 p . Ne w<br />
York: Academic Press .<br />
Edmondson, W . T., and G . G . Winberg (eds .) .<br />
1971 . A manual of methods for the assessment<br />
of secondary productivity in fres h<br />
waters. IBP Handb . No . 17, 386 p . Philadelphia<br />
: F. A. Davis Company .<br />
Fogg, G. E. 1963 . The role of algae in organic<br />
production in aquatic environments. Brit .<br />
Phycol . Bull. 2(4) : 195-204 .<br />
1965. Algal cultures and phytoplankton<br />
ecology . 126 p. Madison : Univ .<br />
Wis . Press .<br />
Goldman, C. R. 1963. Measurement of primary<br />
productivity and limiting factors i n<br />
freshwater with carbon-14 . In M. S. Doty<br />
(ed .), Proc . Conf. on primary productivit y<br />
measurement, marine and freshwater . AE C<br />
Inf. T .I .O . F633, p . 103-113 .<br />
Hobbie, J . E., and R. T . Wright . 1965 . Bio -<br />
assay with bacterial uptake kinetic : glucose<br />
in freshwater. Limnol. Oceanogr. 10(3) :<br />
471-474 .<br />
Hood, D . W. 1970. Symposium on organi c<br />
matter in natural waters . Inst. Mar. Sci . ,<br />
Univ . Alaska Occas . Publ . 1, 625 p .<br />
Hutchinson, G . E . 1957 . A treatise o n<br />
limnology . Vol. I, 1015 p. New York : Joh n<br />
Wiley & Sons, Inc .<br />
Johannes, R . E., and M. Satomi. 1967. Measuring<br />
organic matter retained by aquatic<br />
invertebrates. J. Fish. Res. Board Can .<br />
21(11) : 2467-2471 .<br />
Lighthart, B . 1969. Planktonic and benthic<br />
bacteriovorous protozoa at 11 stations i n<br />
Puget Sound and adjacent Pacific Ocean . J .<br />
Fish. Res . Board Can . 26 : 299-304 .<br />
Lindeman, R . L. 1942. The trophic-dynami c<br />
aspect of ecology . Ecology 23 : 399-418 .<br />
Lund, J. W. G. 1965. The ecology of th e<br />
freshwater phytoplankton. Biol. Rev . 40 :<br />
231-293 .<br />
Menzel, D. W., and R. F. Vaccaro. 1964. The<br />
measurement of dissolved organic and particulate<br />
carbon in water . Limnol . Oceanogr .<br />
9(9): 138-142 .<br />
Parsons, T . R. 1963. Suspended organic mat -<br />
ter in seawater . In M. Seres (ed .), Progres s<br />
299
in oceanography, Vol . 1, p . 205-239. Ne w<br />
York: Pergamon .<br />
and J. D. H. Strickland. 1962 .<br />
On the production of particulate organic<br />
carbon by heterotrophic processes in se a<br />
water. Deep-Sea Res . 8 : 211-222 .<br />
Patton, B . C. 1968. Ecological modeling with<br />
analog and digital computers . Am. Inst .<br />
Biol . Sci., 40 p .<br />
Provasoli, L. 1963. Organic regulation of<br />
phytoplankton fertility . In M . N. Hill (ed .) ,<br />
The seas, p . 165. New York : Interscienc e<br />
Publ .<br />
Riley, G. A. 1963. Theory of food chain relationships<br />
in the ocean . In M. N . Hill (ed .) ,<br />
The seas, p . 438. New York : Interscience<br />
Publ .<br />
Ryther, J . H. 1963. Geographic variations i n<br />
productibility . In M. N. Hill (ed .), The seas,<br />
Nauk. USSR 18(4) : 955-958 .<br />
Sorokin, Y . I. 1966 . Carbon-14 method in the<br />
study of the nutrition of aquatic animals .<br />
Hydrobiology 51(2) : 209-224 .<br />
Stanier, R. Y., M . Doudoroff, and E . A .<br />
Adelberg . 1963. The microbial work . 75 3<br />
p. Englewood Cliffs, N .J . : Prentice Hall .<br />
Steemann-Nielsen, E . 1952. The use of radio -<br />
active carbon for measuring organic production<br />
in the sea. J. Conserv. Intern.<br />
Explor . 18 : 117-140 .<br />
1963. Productivity, definitio n<br />
and measurement . In M. N. Hill (ed.), The<br />
sea, p. 129. New York : Interscience Publ .<br />
and E. G. Jorgensen . 1968. The<br />
adaptation of plankton algae. I. General<br />
part. Physiol. Plant. 21 : 401-413 .<br />
Strickland, J. D. H. 1965. Production o f<br />
organic matter in the primary stages of the<br />
p. 347. New York : Interscience Publ .<br />
marine food chain . In J. P. Riley and G .<br />
Saunders, G . W. 1957 . Interrelations of dissolved<br />
organic matter and phytoplankton .<br />
Skirrow (eds.), Chemical oceanography, p .<br />
712 . New York : Academic Press .<br />
Bot. Rev. 23(6) : 389-410 .<br />
and T. R. Parsons . 1965 . A<br />
1971 . Coupled oscillations in<br />
the metabolism of bacteria in lakes .<br />
(Abstr.) Am. Soc. Microbiol . (Bacteriol .<br />
Proc.), p . 53 .<br />
and Thomas A . Storch . 1971 .<br />
Coupled oscillatory control mechanism in a<br />
planktonic system . Nature New Biol .<br />
230(10) : 58-60 .<br />
, F. B. Trama, and R. W. Bachmann.<br />
1962. Evaluation of a modified<br />
carbon-14 technique for shipboard estimation<br />
of photosynthesis in large lakes . Univ .<br />
Mich., Great Lakes Res. Div . Publ . No . 8, p .<br />
61 .<br />
Schindler, D . W. 1966 . A liquid scintillation<br />
method for measuring carbon-14 uptake i n<br />
photosyntheses. Nature (London )<br />
211(505) : 844-845 .<br />
manual of sea water analysis . Fish . Res . Bd .<br />
Can . Bull. 125, p. 203 .<br />
Strugger, S. 1948 . Fluorescence microscope<br />
examination of bacteria in soil . Can.J. Res .<br />
26 : 188-193 .<br />
Stumm, W ., and James J . Morgan. 1970 .<br />
Aquatic chemistry : an introduction emphasizing<br />
chemical equilibria in natural waters .<br />
583 p. New York : John Wiley & Sons, Inc .<br />
Ward, F . J ., B . Wong, and G . G . C. Robinson .<br />
1970 . A liquid scintillation procedure for<br />
determining the effect of size on self -<br />
adsorption of carbon-14 in Daphnia pulex .<br />
Limnol. Oceanogr. 15(4) : 648-652 .<br />
Wood, E. J. F . 1965 . Marine microbial<br />
ecology . 243 p . New York : Reinholt .<br />
Wright, R . T., and J. E. Hobbie . 1966 . Use of<br />
glucose and acetate by bacteria and algae in<br />
Shuskina, E. A., and A . V . Monakov . 1969 . aquatic ecosystems . Ecology 47(3) :<br />
The use of radiocarbon for the separation<br />
of planktonic animals into trophic levels .<br />
447-464 .<br />
300
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium.<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Dynamics of nutrient supply and<br />
primary production in<br />
Lake Sammamish, Washington<br />
Eugene B . Welc h<br />
an d<br />
Demetrios E . Spyridakis<br />
Department of Civil Engineering<br />
University of Washingto n<br />
Seattle, Washingto n<br />
Abstract<br />
Lake Sammamish, which lies about 12 miles east of Seattle, Washington, with moderate depth (mean 17 .7 m )<br />
and area (19.8 km 2 ), ranks third in productivity of the four Cedar River drainage lakes and can be classified<br />
mesotrophic. While diversion of over one-half the P from nearby Lake Washington during 1963-67 was followe d<br />
by reduction in winter mean P content and a rapid shift from eutrophy to mesotrophy (Edmondson 1970) ,<br />
mean winter P content and measured characteristics of plankton response have not changed in Lake Sammamis h<br />
following a diversion of similar magnitude . Annual nutrient budgets suggest a reduction in sedimented P sinc e<br />
diversion but little change in the quantity of P released from anaerobic sediment . P availability in the water<br />
column (winter mean content) appears to be controlled by Fe precipitation to a greater extent than in Lak e<br />
Washington. Experiments in situ show that N and P are equally limiting to summer phytoplankton productivity ,<br />
but as found in Lake Washington, P may be of more long-term significance.<br />
Introduction<br />
The supply of limiting nutrient is probabl y<br />
the most significant factor that determine s<br />
the trophic status of a lake . This relationshi p<br />
can be affected by several factors, particularl y<br />
those that control nutrient supply such as<br />
morphometric and hydrologic conditions .<br />
Vollenweider (1968) has related supply of N<br />
and P to trophic status of 20 lakes and foun d<br />
that the relationship was dependent on lake<br />
morphometry expressed as mean depth . This<br />
relationship illustrates that reasonably reliable<br />
predictions about the primary production and<br />
trophic status of lakes are possible with in -<br />
formation on the supply of limiting nutrient<br />
and lake morphometry . Such predictability i s<br />
valuable in the management of man's encroachment<br />
on lakes. Of still more value is<br />
knowledge of the response rate of trophi c<br />
status indicators to changes in nutrient<br />
supply .<br />
This paper presents preliminary findings on<br />
a nutrient supply budget for Lake Sammamish<br />
near Seattle, Washington, and ho w<br />
alteration in that supply by sewage diversio n<br />
has affected nutrient limitation and primar y<br />
production . The response in Lake Sammamish<br />
to nutrient diversion is compared to that in<br />
Lake Washington and mechanisms are hypothesized<br />
to explain the delayed recovery in Lak e<br />
Sammamish . Their trophic status is compare d<br />
to that of other study lakes in the Cedar River<br />
drainage, Findley Lake and Chester Mors e<br />
Lake, with the ultimate intent of refining predictive<br />
relationships among trophic status ,<br />
nutrient supply and morphometric factors i n<br />
lakes. Prediction of the rate of response o f<br />
trophic status indicators to change in nutrien t<br />
supply should also be enhanced by detaile d<br />
comparison of manipulated Lakes Sammamish<br />
and Washington .<br />
301
Methods<br />
The water column in Lake Sammamish wa s<br />
sampled at 2-week intervals in spring, summer,<br />
and early fall and monthly in winter during<br />
1970 and 1971 . Phytoplankton biomas s<br />
and productivity and nutrient content wer e<br />
determined in samples collected from severa l<br />
depths. Nutrient supply from surface water s<br />
was estimated by monthly sample collectio n<br />
and flow measurements from two major an d<br />
11 minor streams entering the lake .<br />
Primary productivity was determined i n<br />
situ according to procedures described b y<br />
Goldman (1961) . Water samples inoculate d<br />
with C 14 were incubated at four depths for 4<br />
hours and the results reported as integrate d<br />
productivity in the photic zone extrapolate d<br />
to daily rates assuming a 1 :1 relationship with<br />
incident light. Data are reported from on e<br />
centrally located station in each of the lakes .<br />
Methods of Strickland and Parsons (1968 )<br />
were followed for N, P, and Chlorophyll a<br />
(Chl a) analyses in water . Total and orthophosphate<br />
phosphorus were determined spectrophotometrically<br />
as a phosphomolybdat e<br />
complex. Reactive silicate was also deter -<br />
mined from a silico-molybdate complex .<br />
Nitrate and nitrite were determined spectrophotometrically<br />
following reduction in a<br />
cadmium-copper filled column and are reported<br />
together as NO 3 -N. Chl a was determined<br />
with a Turner Model 110 fluorometer .<br />
Cations were determined by atomic absorption<br />
techniques and anions by routine procedures<br />
(American Public Health Associatio n<br />
1971). All analyses except for total P wer e<br />
performed on filtered (0.451.t poresize) water<br />
samples .<br />
Surface sediments (surface to 10-cm depth )<br />
were collected with a Peterson dredge in the<br />
four lakes . Surface sediments in Lake Sammamish<br />
were sampled more extensively (2 6<br />
samples from 26 different depths) than those<br />
of the other three lakes where only four to si x<br />
samples were collected . Analyses for total C ,<br />
N, and P contents of air-dried sediments wer e<br />
performed with procedures of Baker (1970 )<br />
for C, Bremner (1960, 1965) for N, and<br />
Delfino et al. (1969) for P. The phosphomolybdate-ascorbic<br />
acid method of Strickland<br />
and Parsons (1968) was used for the determination<br />
of extracted P . Results are expresse d<br />
on an ovendried (104°C) basis .<br />
Bioassays to determine the limiting nutrient(s)<br />
were conducted in large (0 .21 m z X5m)<br />
plastic cylinders submerged in the lake for 7<br />
days. Nitrogen, P, C, and Si were added t o<br />
experimental bags separately and in combination<br />
. Phytoplankton response was determine d<br />
by daily measurements of productivity rat e<br />
and Chl a concentration . Significance of<br />
response was judged from results of analysi s<br />
of variance using a factorial design and<br />
Dunnett 's test at the 95-percent level of confidence<br />
(Steel and Torrie 1960) . Data are<br />
graphed as integrated values over time to indicate<br />
total production .<br />
Lake Sammamish<br />
Trophic Status<br />
Lake Sammamish is considered mesotrophic<br />
judging from measurements of phytoplankton<br />
productivity, biomass (Chi a), hypolimnetic<br />
oxygen deficit, and concentration s<br />
and loading of N and P . Guidelines for thes e<br />
characteristics are suggested in table 1 fo r<br />
judging the trophic status of a lake . With on e<br />
exception, values for these characteristics i n<br />
Lake Sammamish fall in between ranges typical<br />
of oligotrophy and those of eutrophy . Th e<br />
exception, mean winter ortho PO 4 -P, i s<br />
greater than the level often considered indicative<br />
of subsequent summer nuisance alga l<br />
blooms (Sawyer 1952). Of probably mor e<br />
significance than winter concentration, how -<br />
ever, is annual supply of P . In this regard ,<br />
Lake Sammamish lies clearly between safe<br />
and danger limits of eutrophication, her e<br />
construed to suggest oligotrophy an d<br />
eutrophy, respectively (Vollenweider 1968) .<br />
These ranges of measured characteristic s<br />
are at best only guidelines for judging the<br />
trophic status in lakes . Eutrophication o f<br />
lakes is a complex process and is affected b y<br />
climate, basin morphology and soil type . Differences<br />
in these factors could lead to considerable<br />
inconsistencies in judging trophi c<br />
status using the limited number of characteristics<br />
in table 1 . On the other hand, the<br />
302
Table 1.-Suggested criteria for judging trophic status of temperate<br />
lakes and respective values for Lake Sammamish<br />
Item Oligotrophic Eutrophic Lake Sammamish<br />
Chlorophyll a ug/l ' (growth season mean) 0-4 10-100 7 . 1<br />
Primary productivity 2 mgC/m 2 • day<br />
(growth season mean) 30-300 1,000-3,000 77 0<br />
Hypolimnetic 02 deficit 3 in mg 02 /cm 2 • day<br />
(mean rate) < .025 >.055 .05 3<br />
Ortho P04 -P in ug/14 (winter mean) >10 12 (total P, 26 )<br />
NO 3 -N in ug/l4 (winter mean) >300 14 2<br />
Total P annual supply s in g/m 2 • yr for<br />
mean depth 17 .7 m .26 .2 0<br />
Total N annual supplys in g/m 2 • yr for<br />
mean depth 17 .7 m 4 .00 3 .8 7<br />
' Based on data from several lakes in Canada and Unite d States .<br />
' Modified from Rhode (1969), including data from Schindler and Nighswander (1970) .<br />
3 After Mortimer (1941, 1942) .<br />
°Modified from Sawyer (1952) .<br />
5 After Vollenweider (1968) .<br />
Table 2.-Comparison of trophic status indicators (May-August means) in<br />
Lake Sammamish surface water with other lakes of the Ceda r<br />
River drainage, Western Coniferous Biome, Washington<br />
Lake Total P P04 -P N0 3 -N Si Chl a Productivity Secch i<br />
ug/l mg C/m 2 • day m<br />
Findley' 4 .9 1 .0 3 .0 76 0.3 370 1 5<br />
Chester Morse 5 .1 1 .0 16 .3 373 1 .6 520 7 . 3<br />
Sammamish 48 .0 7 .0 86 .0 1,100 7 .1 770 3 . 5<br />
Washington 2 18 .7 1 .1 56 .5 9 .5 1,070 2 .3<br />
July and August only because of earlier ice over .<br />
2W. T . Edmondson, personal communication .<br />
30 3
measurements of algal response and the tw o<br />
most commonly limiting nutrients probably<br />
represent a minimum list of variables most<br />
pertinent to the eutrophication process . To<br />
increase the general value of such guidelines ,<br />
the data base should be more extensive in<br />
addition to including sediment constituents .<br />
Cedar River Drainage Lakes<br />
Comparison of nutrient and plankton characteristics<br />
in the four lakes of the study are a<br />
(table 2) shows that Lake Sammamish is inter -<br />
mediate in trophic status. Data from May t o<br />
August show Lake Sammamish to be slightl y<br />
more eutrophic than Lake Washington based<br />
on mean nutrient concentrations, but less<br />
eutrophic based on algal density and productivity<br />
indices. Judging trophic status fro m<br />
nutrient content during the growing seaso n<br />
can be misleading . Lake Washington is actually<br />
more than twice as enriched as Lake Sammamish<br />
based on annual P supply (0 .48 versu s<br />
0.20 g/m2 ), which conforms to the differences<br />
in productivity .<br />
Of more interest in table 2 than the comparison<br />
of Lake Sammamish and Lake Washington<br />
is the striking contrast in the tota l<br />
series. Findley Lake is clearly oligotrophic ,<br />
while Lake Washington near sea level is apparently<br />
transitional between mesotrophy an d<br />
eutrophy . Lake Chester Morse and Lake Sammamish<br />
are intermediate in elevation an d<br />
trophic status, but nearly as widely separate d<br />
as are Findley and Washington (for other<br />
morphometric data, see Taub et al . 1972) .<br />
Data from these four lakes alone should pro -<br />
vide a substantial framework for prediction of<br />
trophic status from lake nutrient supply an d<br />
morphometry information, which is important<br />
to lake management .<br />
The two oligotrophic lakes are also widely<br />
different than the mesotrophic lakes in sediment<br />
characteristics and ionic composition .<br />
Table 3 summarizes data on major chemical<br />
ions for the four lakes . A graded sequence in<br />
water chemical composition from the lakes in<br />
the upper drainage to Lake Washington is<br />
readily apparent. A four- to tenfold increase<br />
in concentration is observed with most<br />
chemical parameters when comparing Findley<br />
and Chester Morse Lakes to Lake Sammamish<br />
and Lake Washington . These radical differences<br />
in chemical quality of the lake waters i n<br />
the Cedar River Drainage are primarily due to<br />
diversified human use and different geologic<br />
formation of the lake basins .<br />
Results of analyses for total C, N, and P i n<br />
samples of surface sediments are presented in<br />
table 4 . The larger C concentrations and the<br />
higher C/N ratios in the sediments of Findley<br />
and Chester Morse Lakes when compared<br />
with those values in the lakes of lower elevation<br />
appear to reflect trophic status and are<br />
most probably due to differences in allochthonous<br />
and autochthonous inputs . In th e<br />
two oligotrophic lakes, most of the organic C<br />
in sediments is derived from allochthonou s<br />
sources which are relatively resistant to mineralization,<br />
partially as a result of low N availa -<br />
Table 3.-Average summer (1971) chemical ion content in surfac e<br />
waters of Cedar River drainage lakes (Barnes 1972 )<br />
Lake HCO 3 S0 4 Cl Ca Mg Na K Specific conductanc e<br />
mg/1 micromhos/cm at 25° C<br />
Findley 9 .8 0 .4 0 .6 1 .1 0 .3 0.8
Table 4.-Average C, N, and P contents of surface sediments from<br />
Cedar River drainage lakes (Bauer 1971, Horton 1972) '<br />
Lake C 2 N P<br />
C/ N<br />
ratio<br />
N/P<br />
ratio<br />
percent mg/1<br />
Findley 8 .98 5 .55 1 .09 16 .18 5 .14<br />
Chester Morse 6 .12 3 .71 1 .56 16.41 2 .3 7<br />
Sammamish 5 .11 4 .82 1 .32 10.60 3 .6 5<br />
Washington 4 .22 3 .71 2 .13 11 .37 1 .74<br />
' Values are in terms of ovendried (104°C) sediment .<br />
2 The sediments from all four lakes contain less than 0 .1 percent CO3 - C on an ovendried basis .<br />
Table 5 .-Comparison of nutrient supply in Lakes Sammamish and Washington<br />
before and after diversion with special reference to Vollenweider' s<br />
(1968) nutrient supply limitations with respect to mean depth '<br />
Item<br />
Lak e<br />
Sammamish<br />
Lak e<br />
Washingto n<br />
Area (km2 ) 19 .8 87 .61 5<br />
Volume (km3 ) .350 2.88 4<br />
Maximum depth (m) 31 64<br />
Mean depth (m) 17 .7 32 . 9<br />
Flushing rate (year) 2 .2 3 . 0<br />
Prediversion annual total P supply (kg) 11,160 92,600<br />
Prediversion annual total P supply per surface area (g/m 2 ) .56 1 .0 6<br />
Percent total P income diverted 65 2 5 5<br />
Postdiversion annual total P supply (kg) 3,906 41,70 0<br />
Postdiversion annual total P supply per surface area (g/m 2 ) .20 .4 8<br />
Vollenweider's danger limit of P supply<br />
for respective mean depth (g/m 2 )<br />
.26 .4 2<br />
Prediversion annual inorg. N supply (kg) 49,100 246,10 0<br />
Prediversion annual total N supply per surface area (g/m 2 ) 3 4 .96 5 .6 3<br />
Percent inorg. N diverted 22 1 2<br />
Postdiversion annual inorg . N (NO3 -N) supply (kg) 38,298 216,56 8<br />
Postdiversion annual total N supply per surface area (g/m2 ) 3 3 .87 4 .3 3<br />
Vollenweider's danger limit of N supply<br />
for respective mean depth (g/m 2 ) 4 .00 6.0 0<br />
1 Emery, Moon, and Welch, unpublished data .<br />
2 Estimated on the basis of population equivalent nutrients diverted and prediversion annual income to the<br />
lake .<br />
3 Total N values are estimated by doubling inorg . N values .<br />
30 5
ility . Autochthonous sources are more significant<br />
in the mesotrophic lakes . The P conten t<br />
of all lake sediments was relatively high, with<br />
the highest occurring in Lake Washington .<br />
The smaller N/P ratios observed in the sediments<br />
of Lake Washington are undoubtedly<br />
due to the higher sediment P concentration .<br />
Nutrient Supply an d<br />
Primary Productio n<br />
The trophic status of a lake is probably<br />
most closely related to the supply of macro -<br />
nutrients N, P and C, which may not be easil y<br />
indicated by concentration . Although growth<br />
rate of phytoplankton is related to the concentration<br />
of a limiting nutrient, productio n<br />
is related to the supply rate of that nutrient<br />
(Dugdale 1967) . The trophic status in 20 well -<br />
known lakes in the world has been related to<br />
annual loading of N and P and mean depth<br />
(Vollenweider 1968) and with continued refinement<br />
such a relationship promises to be<br />
even more useful to management . As indicated<br />
earlier, Lake Washington is more productive<br />
than Lake Sammamish, and this tren d<br />
correlated with P supply or annual loading ,<br />
but not growing-season concentrations . Concentrations<br />
during complete mixing in th e<br />
winter more nearly represent available supply<br />
than do concentrations during the growin g<br />
season. Alteration in the nutrient supply<br />
should change productivity, but the rate o f<br />
that change may depend upon physical characteristics<br />
of the basin .<br />
Effect of Nutrient Diversion<br />
Sewage was diverted from Lake Washington<br />
r<br />
16 (1965 8 1970 )<br />
101- -0-- -0,s<br />
p \<br />
0 V I I } I I I I I I<br />
SEPT OCT NOV DEC IAN FEB MAR APL MAY JUN JUL AU G<br />
Figure 1 . A comparison of surface water total phosphorus for 1964-65 and 1970-71 in Lake Sammamish .<br />
Shaded regions represent differences between means for the period covered by the horizontal lines . Arrows<br />
to the right indicate winter-spring averages of surface water total phosphorus for Lake Washington fo r<br />
prediversion (1963) and postdiversion (1971) conditions (unpublished data-Emery, Moon, and Welch) .<br />
306
during 1963 to 1967 and from Lake Sammamish<br />
in 1968, by the Municipality o f<br />
Metropolitan_ Seattle . The diversion remove d<br />
about 55 percent of the annual external P<br />
supply and 12 percent of the inorganic N<br />
from Lake Washington . Phosphorus and N<br />
external supply into Lake Sammamish was<br />
reduced by about 65 and 22 percent, respectively.<br />
Although the N supply to Lake Washington<br />
is not greatly different than that t o<br />
Lake Sammamish, Lake Washington receive d<br />
about twice the supply of P than Lake Sammamish<br />
(1 .06 vs. 0.56 g/m 2 ) before diversio n<br />
and this difference is still maintained afte r<br />
diversion (0 .48 vs. 0.20 g/m 2 ) (table 5). Th e<br />
diversion brought the P supply to Lake Washington<br />
to near Vollenweider's danger limit fo r<br />
eutrophication and below the danger limit i n<br />
Lake Sammamish (table 5). The prediversio n<br />
N supply did not exceed the danger limi t<br />
nearly as much as did P in either lake so N<br />
diversion may be considered less significan t<br />
than P. According to the alteration in P sup -<br />
ply and if P is most significant in these lake s<br />
as Vollenweider's relationship shows, the n<br />
p h y t o p l ankton productivity and biomas s<br />
should have been reduced in both lakes .<br />
The mean winter (December to April) total<br />
P concentration in the surface waters of Lak e<br />
Washington decreased over 60 percent following<br />
sewage diversion (Edmondson 1970) .<br />
Although diversion was not complete unti l<br />
1967, winter P concentrations began gradually<br />
decreasing soon after the 4-year diversio n<br />
process was initiated in 1963 . In contrast,<br />
little difference can be seen in the 197 1<br />
winter mean P concentrations in Lake Sammamish<br />
3 years after diversion in 1968 (fig .<br />
1) .<br />
Phytoplankton biomass quickly responde d<br />
to the reduction in mean winter P0 4 -P content<br />
in Lake Washington as shown by Edmondson<br />
(1970) (fig. 2) . Chl a decreased in<br />
direct proportion to P0 4 -P, while the other<br />
macronutrients, C and N, varied independent<br />
of Chl a. A significant change in phytoplankton<br />
biomass, production or water clarity ha s<br />
not been observed in Lake Sammamish.' In<br />
I R. M. Emery, C. E. Moon, and E . B. Welch ,<br />
unpublished data .<br />
one respect this is gratifying because winter<br />
mean NO 3 -N and total P concentrations,<br />
which should indicate available supply, also<br />
have not changed . In another respect, the delayed<br />
responses of winter mean P content to<br />
diversion of over one-half the annual suppl y<br />
to the lake suggests that factors controllin g<br />
these winter levels in the two lakes are different<br />
in either kind or magnitude .<br />
Factors controlling winter P concentrations<br />
in Lake Sammamish are not yet understood ,<br />
but comparison of seasonal changes in total P<br />
and morphological characteristics between the<br />
two lakes offers a hypothesis . Winter P content<br />
remained high until the spring diato m<br />
pulse in Lake Washington following which a<br />
moderate decrease was observed (see footnot e<br />
1). In Lake Sammamish, total P content<br />
normally increased to peaks as high as 70 t o<br />
100 pg/1 following turnover in November . Instead<br />
of remaining high until the sprin g<br />
diatom pulse in April, as it does in Lake Washington,<br />
total P decreased during the winter in<br />
Lake Sammamish before the diatom pulse<br />
(fig. 1). The surface water in Lake Sammamish<br />
has been observed to become cloudy<br />
with particulate matter during turnover an d<br />
remain that way for a month or two before<br />
clearing. Phosphorus may be sorbed by this<br />
particulate matter and removed in shallower<br />
Lake Sammamish (mean depth 17 .7 m), while<br />
in deeper Lake Washington (mean dept h<br />
37 m), particulate matter from the bottom is<br />
not so readily mixed to the surface . In support<br />
of this, iron content during and followin g<br />
turnover is higher in Lake Sammamish than i n<br />
Lake Washington particularly in the hypolimnion<br />
. The lower residual P content in late<br />
winter in Lake Sammamish is undoubtedl y<br />
due to P sedimentation through interactio n<br />
with relatively greater amounts of iro n<br />
(Horton 1972, Shapiro et al . 1971) .<br />
Recovery rate in Lake Sammamish may b e<br />
slower than in Lake Washington because th e<br />
former had never attained the enrichment o r<br />
productivity level of the latter . Rate of recovery<br />
might have also been rapid in Lak e<br />
Sammamish if prediversion annual supply had<br />
been as great as that in Lake Washington .<br />
There may exist a control threshold level of P<br />
in the lake, above which alteration by manip -<br />
307
125<br />
•<br />
1933 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969<br />
Figure 2 . (Printed with permission of W. T. Edmondson and Science magazine-Copyright 1970 by th e<br />
American Association for the Advancement of Science .) Mean winter (Jan. to Apr.) values in surface water;<br />
summer (July and Aug .) values of Chl a in surface phytoplankton . The 1963 values, plotted as 100 percent ,<br />
were (in micrograms per liter) : P, 57 ; N, 428 ; and ChI a, 38 . Unconnected points show winter means (Jan .<br />
and Feb .) of bicarbonate alkalinity and free CO 2 in surface water (25 .3 and 3 .2 mg/liter in 1963) .<br />
ulation of external supply would be relativel y<br />
rapid while below that level the respons e<br />
would be very slow .<br />
Response to Short-Term Nutrient Change<br />
To relate external nutrient supply rate to<br />
production and trophic status in the lake, the<br />
nutrient of most significance must be known .<br />
Is phosphorus the most significant nutrient i n<br />
Lake Sammamish as has been the case i n<br />
Washington? This problem was approached i n<br />
two ways: (1) by observing the seasonal<br />
change in N/P ratio compared with productivity<br />
rate and biomass and (2) in situ experimental<br />
addition of macronutrients separately<br />
and in combination to plastic bags . Generally<br />
speaking, if the ratio of N :P by weight is<br />
308
greater than 7 .2:1 (16:1 by atoms) then P<br />
should be limiting further growth and its addition<br />
should increase production with th e<br />
reverse case true for N . If the ratio is aroun d<br />
7 .2 :1, then both nutrients would be require d<br />
to increase production. Of course, this can<br />
only be approximately true because th e<br />
atomic ratio of 16N :1P in algal cells is an<br />
average and interaction among nutrients ma y<br />
occur such that ratios different than thi s<br />
average may stimulate uptake of one or mor e<br />
nutrients .<br />
Lake Sammamish has one major phytoplankton<br />
outburst which occurs in the sprin g<br />
and is dominated by diatoms . In 1970, th e<br />
outburst occurred during May (fig . 3), whic h<br />
for unknown reasons was about 1 month later<br />
than normal. Productivity followed a similar<br />
trend as biomass (Chi a), but carbon assimilation<br />
(productivity) per unit biomass wa s<br />
noticeably greatest prior to the biomass peak .<br />
During this outburst, NO 3 -N decreased by<br />
more than 500 pg/l while ortho P04 -P decreased<br />
by 8 µg/l at most, a removal ratio of<br />
more than 60 :1 (fig. 4) . If this ratio of removal<br />
represents uptake by phytoplankton ,<br />
which it most likely does, then it is weighted<br />
heavily in favor of N relative to the expected<br />
requirements of cells. Inspection of figure 4<br />
suggests that prior to the outburst, P was i n<br />
shortest supply relative to needs, but after -<br />
ward, N actually decreased at the surface to a<br />
level less than P, and N should then have been<br />
limiting. The great change in N relative to P, if<br />
all a result of plankton uptake, suggests tha t<br />
the supply of P0 4 -P was much greater than<br />
indicated by the concentration decrease. This<br />
supply could have come from rapid recyclin g<br />
from the particulate phase and, thus, the relatively<br />
constant P0 4 -P content only represented<br />
the difference between supply and demand<br />
of P .<br />
The change in mean ratio of N :P in the<br />
photic zone is compared to surface productivity<br />
and biomass in figure 3 . Although it is<br />
clear from the ratio that P was in shortes t<br />
supply relative to needs prior to the outburst<br />
and that the uptake was still apparentl y<br />
weighted in favor of N, the mean ratio in th e<br />
photic zone following the outburst remaine d<br />
near the 7 .2 :1 required value . Thus, if th e<br />
average values in the photic zone best reflect<br />
the consequence of nutrient uptake by plank -<br />
ton, then both N and P would appear almos t<br />
1600 - 2 8<br />
I 24<br />
Q 1200<br />
- 80<br />
N E<br />
U<br />
rnE<br />
12<br />
800<br />
8<br />
4<br />
ti<br />
1<br />
- 0<br />
F<br />
M<br />
I I 1 I<br />
A M J J A 5 0 N D<br />
1970<br />
Figure 3 . Primary productivity and chlorophyll a in the surface water and mean N/P ratio in the photic zone o f<br />
Lake Sammamish during 1970 .<br />
309
8 0<br />
600<br />
500<br />
cn 400<br />
z<br />
z 300<br />
0<br />
Z 200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
J I- M A M J J A S<br />
1970<br />
Figure 4 . N0 3 -N and P0 4 -P (ortho) in the surface water of Lake Sammamish during 1970.<br />
0<br />
equally limiting relative to needs during th e<br />
summer .<br />
Nutrient limitation was also determined by<br />
adding N, P, C, and Si singly and in combination<br />
to plastic bags suspended in the lake .<br />
Nitrogen and P additions to bags increased th e<br />
concentrations from a mean of 3 pg/l N and 8<br />
µg/l P to 237 pg/l N and 21 pg/l P, a fina l<br />
ratio of about 11N :1P by weight. Silicon was<br />
added as the third macronutrient in 1970 that<br />
raised concentrations in the bags from a mean<br />
of 0.2 mg/l to 1 .3 mg/l, while C was added i n<br />
1971 that raised the concentration from 7 . 5<br />
mg/l to 16 .9 .<br />
Results of the two experiments are show n<br />
in figure 5 . Response is measured in terms o f<br />
Chl a averaged over 7 days and C 14 productivity<br />
averaged over the first 2 days in 197 0<br />
and the first 4 days in 1971 . In no case did<br />
the single addition of a nutrient significantly<br />
stimulate C 14 uptake or biomass accumulation.<br />
The phytoplankton response was significantly<br />
greater than the control only when N<br />
and P were added together. This suggests that<br />
the ratio of available N :P prior to addition of<br />
N or P must have been near the required rati o<br />
of the plankton cells . This is corroborated by<br />
the mean N:P ratio in the photic zone durin g<br />
summer being very close to the 7 .2:1 mean<br />
considered typical for phytoplankton cells .<br />
Interpretations of limiting nutrients fro m<br />
seasonal data and results of experiments must<br />
be used with caution to predict effects of<br />
nutrient change in a lake . The conclusion that<br />
N and P are equally limiting to phytoplankton<br />
in Lake Sammamish as a result of experimental<br />
additions is based on measure d<br />
changes in biomass . This is largely because the<br />
response is determined over several day s<br />
allowing ample time for biomass accumulation.<br />
Growth rate may or may not change i n<br />
response to nutrient addition or change de -<br />
pending upon where the raised limiting nutrient<br />
level is on the growth rate-nutrient concentration<br />
response curve . However, biomass<br />
will respond usually to an increased suppl y<br />
rate of limiting nutrient if other factors are<br />
not limiting growth. The change in the N : P<br />
ratio is observed after the net result of nutrient<br />
uptake and loss has occurred . This can b e<br />
taken to indicate that an increase or decreas e<br />
in the supply of limiting nutrient will potentially<br />
alter biomass accordingly if othe r<br />
environmental factors are optimum .<br />
310
2 .0<br />
1 .0<br />
0<br />
Si P-N N-Si P-Si P-N-Si Contr .<br />
(A) 1970 BAG EX<strong>PE</strong>RIMENT S<br />
r<br />
9<br />
6<br />
3<br />
0<br />
P N C P-N N-C P-C P-N-C Contr .<br />
(B) 1971<br />
BAG EX<strong>PE</strong>RIMENTS<br />
Figure 5. Response of phytoplankton to added nutrients in in situ experiments in Lak e<br />
Sammamish as measured by C 14 assimilation and Chl a content averaged over time .<br />
Significant differences (95-percent level) from the control are indicated by dotted line s<br />
(unpublished data-Emery, Moon, and Welch) .<br />
311
As the results of Edmondson (1970) sho w<br />
in figure 2, a continual reduction in winte r<br />
mean P04 -P content lead to a proportional<br />
long-term decrease in mean summer algal biomass.<br />
The winter means indicate the supply o f<br />
nutrient available for subsequent productio n<br />
in summer . This may not mean that in short -<br />
term experiments PO 4 -P was always limiting<br />
biomass production. In fact, Edmondson<br />
(1970) showed from the N :P ratio in surface<br />
water that prior to sewage diversion N wa s<br />
more limiting than P and as P began to de -<br />
crease more than N, then P became limiting .<br />
This indicates that relationships betwee n<br />
annual changes in supply of limiting nutrien t<br />
and mean biomass are more predictable than<br />
can be obtained from short-term experiments .<br />
Seasonal alterations in the N :P ratio, as occur<br />
in Lake Sammamish, can result in different<br />
nutrients limiting at different times as a resul t<br />
of interaction between biological uptake an d<br />
chemical factors. The nutrient that limits<br />
most of the time and is, therefore, most influential<br />
on lake production can be best indicated<br />
from annual data. Although N and P<br />
appear equally limiting in Lake Sammamis h<br />
during August, P supply is considered th e<br />
most critical factor controlling long-term production<br />
as has been the case in Lake Washing -<br />
ton. Although plankton biomass in Lake Sam -<br />
mamish has not responded to change i n<br />
external P supply, the springtime concentration,<br />
which also represents supply for summe r<br />
growth, has also not changed in contrast t o<br />
the situation in Lake Washington .<br />
Internal-External Nutrient Supply<br />
The internal supply of nutrients, principally<br />
from sediments, may also partly explai n<br />
the slow recovery in Lake Sammamish fro m<br />
diversion of part of the external supply . Th e<br />
total P budget in a 30 m deep water column<br />
of Lake Sammamish was calculated for the<br />
period of November 15, 1970, to Novembe r<br />
19, 1971, as a function of inflow to and outflow<br />
from the lake, and of seasonal variatio n<br />
in P concentration in the lake water colum n<br />
(table 6). These calculations were made in a<br />
manner similar to those employed by Vollenweider<br />
(1968) for data provided by Bachofe n<br />
(1960) on Lake Baldeggersee . The differences<br />
in the values of P concentration in the lak e<br />
water column at the onset and the end of th e<br />
stratified period, corrected for external P sup -<br />
ply, represent the relative contribution o f<br />
sedimented P in the water column . The onse t<br />
of stratification in Lake Sammamish wa s<br />
designated to coincide not with 0 2 depletio n<br />
in the hypolimnion but rather with the firs t<br />
Table 6.-Exchange of total P between water and deep sediments in Lake Sammamis h<br />
during one aerobic and one anaerobic period '<br />
Relative hypolimnion oxygen<br />
Aerobic period,<br />
Nov . 15, 1970-<br />
Anaerobic period ,<br />
May 21, 1971-<br />
conditions May 21, 1971 Nov. 19, 197 1<br />
(188 days) (182 days)<br />
Change in total P content o f<br />
representative column of water, g/m 2 -0 .870 +1 .07 0<br />
Lake retention from surface loading, g/m 2 + .134 + .26 5<br />
Algebraic difference<br />
= amount released by sediments, g/m 2 + .80 5<br />
or<br />
= amount taken up by sediments, g/m 2 -1 .00 4<br />
Mean daily rates of release or uptake, g/m 2 day - .006 + .004<br />
' From Moon (1972) .<br />
312
detectable increase in concentration of hypolimnetic<br />
total P (25-30 m from the lake water<br />
surface) over that observed in late spring.<br />
Thus, the increase in the hypolimnetic total P<br />
concentration from about 15 pg/1 in Ma y<br />
1971 to 25 pg/1 in June 1971 was taken t o<br />
indicate the onset of lake stratification .<br />
Similarly, the end of lake stratification coincided<br />
with the period at which maximu m<br />
changes in hypolimnetic total P concentration<br />
were observed : from about 80 pg/1 on November<br />
19, 1971, to 15 µg/1 on November 26 .<br />
A net P deposition in the sediments o f<br />
Lake Sammamish is indicated from the data<br />
in table 6 . For the period of May 21, 1971, to<br />
November 19, 1971, P was released by the<br />
sediments at a rate of 0 .004 g/m 2 -day . This is<br />
nearly three times greater than the corresponding<br />
external supply of 0.0015 g/m 2 -day<br />
for the same period . However, only a portion<br />
of the P internal supply from the sediment<br />
will find its way to the trophogenic layer of<br />
the lake. Normally, most of the sediment -<br />
released P will remain locked in the hypolimnion,<br />
and enrichment of the epilimnion by<br />
sediment phosphorus will depend on edd y<br />
diffusion and other mixing mechanisms conditioned<br />
by exposure, morphometric, an d<br />
hydrologic factors; or by the release of gase s<br />
from the sediments .<br />
It is difficult to appreciate the relative importance<br />
of this P internal supply to the<br />
trophic dynamics of the water column . Very<br />
few exact calculations of phosphorus internal<br />
supply have been made that would permi t<br />
accurate comparisons with these results . Internal<br />
P supply from sediments in Lak e<br />
Baldeggersee, a eutrophic lake in Switzerland ,<br />
of 0.009 to 0.01 g/m 2 -day (Vollenweider<br />
1968) is nearly double that observed in Lake<br />
Sammamish . This fact alone, however, canno t<br />
be employed to explain differences observe d<br />
in the trophic status of these two lakes . Sediment<br />
P release rates similar to the ones measured<br />
in the deep water column of Lake Sammamish<br />
would probably have a greater influence<br />
on the trophic status of small lakes or ,<br />
for that matter, the shallow waters of Lak e<br />
Sammamish . However, preliminary calculations<br />
of sediment P released in the shallower<br />
(10 m deep) waters of Lake Sammamish,<br />
where oxidized conditions predominate, indicate<br />
a P internal supply at least one-half that<br />
measured in deep water .<br />
The P uptake by Lake Sammamish sediments<br />
during the mixed period (November<br />
15, 1970, to May 21, 1971) was 0 .00 6<br />
g/m2 -day. Comparison of Lake Sammamish P<br />
budgets before and after sewage diversion<br />
indicates a nearly threefold decrease in P up -<br />
take by sediments in the period of November<br />
to May following autumn lake destratification.<br />
More striking than this observation is the<br />
fact that the rates of sediment P release fo r<br />
the period of May to November for the year s<br />
1964-65 and 1970-71 were identical, 0 .004<br />
g/m 2 -day. This fact will indicate that th e<br />
mechanism that controls the sediment- P release,<br />
primarily the anoxic conditions in the<br />
hypolimnion, has not changed appreciably<br />
following sewage diversion. The prevailing<br />
anoxic conditions in Lake Sammamish durin g<br />
late summer and fall bring about large in -<br />
creases in hypolimnetic Fe concentration s<br />
(Horton 1972), which upon autumn overturn<br />
cause rapid disappearance of P from the water<br />
column. Low total Fe concentrations in th e<br />
hypolimnion of Lake Washington (one-fifth<br />
to one-tenth of that in Lake Sammamish 2 )<br />
likely account for the low removal of P fro m<br />
Lake Washington following autumn overturn<br />
and maintenance of high winter P concentrations.<br />
In the winter months many more than the<br />
monitored 12 small creeks discharge int o<br />
Lake Sammamish ; however, their relative contribution<br />
to the P inflow is small when compared<br />
to the largest stream, Issaquah Creek ,<br />
which contributes more than 75 percent an d<br />
90 percent of the measured surface P inflow<br />
to the lake during the winter and summe r<br />
months, respectively. Contributions from<br />
ground and rainwater, or from direct soi l<br />
surface runoff, are not included in the calculations<br />
presented in table 6 . The only surfac e<br />
outflow from Lake Sammamish is through th e<br />
Sammamish River. Measurements of P out -<br />
flow from the lake were based on P measurements<br />
in that river .<br />
Although the deep water column total P<br />
2W. T. Edmondson, personal communication .<br />
313
udget in Lake Sammamish indicates a significant<br />
release of sediment P to the overlying<br />
waters, the relative contribution of internal P<br />
supply to the trophogenic layer, when compared<br />
to external supply is far from clear .<br />
Additional annual P budgets in Lake Sammamish<br />
and in other lakes of varying nutrient<br />
income, but with similar morphometric an d<br />
hydrological characteristics, will provide a<br />
more accurate delineation of the role of sediments<br />
in supplying P to the water column . In<br />
particular, measurements of P internal suppl y<br />
for Lake Washington, which is a lake that i s<br />
morphometrically a macroscale of Lake Sammamish,<br />
contains relatively smaller amount s<br />
of Fe and P in hypolimnetic waters during th e<br />
summer stagnation periods, and is mor e<br />
eutrophic than Lake Sammamish, will provid e<br />
a unique test case . External P supply that re -<br />
mains in the epilimnic and metalimnic layer s<br />
of Lake Sammamish, at a rate of 0 .001 5<br />
g/m 2 •day during the summer stagnatio n<br />
period, apparently provides a more readil y<br />
available source of P to the trophogenic laye r<br />
of the lake than does hypolimnetic P . A more<br />
accurate evaluation of the relative importance<br />
of internal P supply to Lake Sammamish productivity<br />
must await a better understanding<br />
of the mixing mechanisms .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
Assistance was provided by graduate students<br />
in Civil Engineering working on individual<br />
research projects as part of the IBP program.<br />
In particular, these are R . S. Barnes, D .<br />
H. Bauer, R . M. Emery, G . R. Hendrey, M. A .<br />
Horton, and C . E. Moon .<br />
The work reported in this paper was sup -<br />
ported in part by National Science Foundation<br />
Grant No . GB-20963 to the Coniferous<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Biome, U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems ,<br />
International Biological Program. Support was<br />
also furnished by an Environmental Protection<br />
Agency Research Fellowship, No .<br />
5-Fl-WP-26, a Public Health Service Training<br />
Grant and an Office of Water Resources Re -<br />
search Allotment Grant, No . A-045 Wash .<br />
This is Contribution No . 47 to the Coniferou s<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Biome .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
American Public Health Association. 1971 .<br />
Standard methods for the examination o f<br />
water and wastewater . Ed . 13. New York .<br />
Bachofen, R. 1960. Stoffhaushalt and Sedimentation<br />
in Baldogger-und Hallwilersee . P .<br />
1-118 . Zurich : Juris-Vorlay .<br />
Baker, R. G . 1970. Initial reports of the dee p<br />
sea drilling project . Vol. IV, p . 746-748 .<br />
Washington, D.C . : U .S. Govt . Print. Office .<br />
Barnes, R. S. 1972 . Trace metal survey o f<br />
Lake Washington drainage from alpine<br />
regions to lowland lakes . 150 p . M .S. thesis<br />
on file, Univ . Wash., Seattle .<br />
Bauer, D. H. 1971 . Carbon and nitrogen in<br />
the sediments of selected lakes in the Lak e<br />
Washington drainage . 91 p. M .S. thesis on<br />
file, Univ. Wash., Seattle .<br />
Bremner, J. M. 1960. Determination of N in<br />
soil by the Kjeldahl method . J. Agric . Sci .<br />
55: 11-33 .<br />
. 1965. Total N . In C . A. Blac k<br />
(ed.), Methods of soil analysis, Part 2, p .<br />
1149-1178 . Madison, Wis . : Am. Soc .<br />
Agron .<br />
Delfino, J . J., G. G. Bortleson, and G . F . Lee.<br />
1969. Distribution of Mn, Fe, P, Mg, K, Na ,<br />
and Ca in the surface sediments of Lake<br />
Mendota . Environ . Sci. Technol. 3 :<br />
1189-1192 .<br />
Edmondson, W . T. 1970. Phosphorus, nitrogen<br />
and algae in Lake Washington afte r<br />
sewage diversion . Science 169 : 690-691 .<br />
Goldman, C . R . 1961 . The measurement o f<br />
primary productivity and limiting factors in<br />
freshwater with carbon-14 . In M. S. Doty<br />
(ed.), Proceedings of the conference on<br />
primary productivity measurements, marine<br />
and freshwater, p . 103-112 . U .S. At .<br />
Energy Comm ., Washington, D .C .<br />
Horton, M . A. 1972 . The role of the sediment s<br />
in the phosphorus cycle of Lake Sammamish.<br />
220 p. M .S. thesis on file, Univ .<br />
Wash., Seattle .<br />
Moon, C. E. 1972. The effect of wastewater<br />
diversion on the nutrient budget of Lake<br />
Sammamish . 160 p. M .S. thesis on file ,<br />
Univ . Wash., Seattle .<br />
Mortimer, C . H. 1941. The exchange of dissolved<br />
substances between mud and wate r<br />
314
in lakes . J. Ecol . 29 : 280-329 .<br />
. 1942 . The exchange of dissolved<br />
substances between mud and wate r<br />
in lakes . J. Ecol . 30 : 147-201 .<br />
Rhode, W. 1969. Crystallization of eutrophication<br />
concepts in northern Europe . In<br />
Eutrophication : causes, consequences, and<br />
correctives, p. 50-64 . Natl. Acad. Sci . ,<br />
Washington, D .C.<br />
Sawyer, C. N. 1952 . Some new aspects of<br />
phosphates in relation to lake fertilization .<br />
Sewage & Ind . Wastes 24 : 768-776 .<br />
Schindler, D . W. 1971. Carbon, nitrogen and<br />
phosphorus and the eutrophication of<br />
freshwater lakes . J. Phycol . 7 : 321-329 .<br />
and J. E . Nighswander. 1970 .<br />
Nutrient supply and primary production in<br />
Clear Lake, eastern Ontario . J. Fish . Res .<br />
Board Can . 27 : 2009-2036.<br />
Shapiro, J ., W . T. Edmondson, and D . E .<br />
Allison. 1971. Changes in the chemical<br />
composition of sediments of Lake Washing -<br />
ton, 1958-1970 . Limnol. & Oceanogr. 16 :<br />
437-452 .<br />
Steel, Robert G., and J. H. Torrie . 1960 .<br />
Principles and procedures of statistics. 48 1<br />
p. New York : McGraw-Hill .<br />
Strickland, J . D. H., and T. R. Parsons . 1965 .<br />
A manual of seawater analysis . Ed. 2 . Bull .<br />
Fish. Res . Board Can . No. 125, 203 p .<br />
Taub, F. B., R. L. Burgner, E . B. Welch, an d<br />
D. E. Spyridakis. 1972. A comparative<br />
study of four lakes . In Jerry F. Franklin, L .<br />
J. Dempster, and Richard H . Waring (eds .) ,<br />
Proceedings-research on coniferous forest<br />
ecosystems-a symposium, p. 21-32. Pac .<br />
Northwest <strong>Forest</strong> & Range Exp. Stn ., Portland,<br />
Oreg .<br />
Vollenweider, R . A. 1968. Scientific fundamentals<br />
of the eutrophication of lakes and<br />
flowing waters, with particular reference to<br />
N and P as factors in eutrophication . 182 p .<br />
Organ . Econ . Co-Op . & Dev . Dir. Sci. Aff . ,<br />
Paris .<br />
315
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Hydroacoustic assessment of<br />
limnetic-feeding fishes<br />
Richard E . Thorn e<br />
Fisheries Research Institut e<br />
University of Washingto n<br />
Seattle, Washington 9819 5<br />
Abstract<br />
Hydroacoustic techniques have been applied at the University of Washington to determine the number and<br />
biomass of limnetic fishes in order to evaluate their role in the productivity of lake systems. The lakes are<br />
surveyed with high frequency, high resolution portable echo sounders . The echo signals are recorded o n<br />
magnetic tape and analyzed by a special computer program. Information on size and species composition is<br />
obtained primarily by net sampling, but acoustic determination of size appears feasible in some cases .<br />
Introduction<br />
Determination of the numbers or biomas s<br />
of fishes has been a continual problem in<br />
fishery management . Traditional techniques<br />
based on catch-per-unit-effort and tagging<br />
experiments have many inadequacies. Th e<br />
problem of assessing fish populations in lake<br />
systems is further compounded by the fac t<br />
that fisheries in lake systems are generally<br />
limited, highly selective, or nonexistent, s o<br />
that catch statistics are of little value .<br />
Determination of the numbers and biomas s<br />
of limnetic-feeding fishes in lake systems i s<br />
essential to assess recruitment, growth, mortality<br />
rates, distribution patterns and inter -<br />
actions with other trophic levels . As part of<br />
International Biological Program studies o f<br />
the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome at the Universit y<br />
of Washington, this problem has been<br />
attacked through the application of hydroacoustic<br />
assessment techniques .<br />
History of<br />
Acoustic Assessment<br />
of Fish Populations<br />
Echo sounders have been used since th e<br />
mid-1930's to study the distribution and relative<br />
abundance of fish populations, especiall y<br />
in marine environments . However, prior t o<br />
about 1960, hydroacoustic studies of fis h<br />
populations were essentially dependent on<br />
subjective interpretation of echogram records .<br />
During the last decade, a variety of electroni c<br />
devices for automated signal processing has<br />
been developed. These advances, combined<br />
with improved data acquisition systems an d<br />
increased understanding of acoustic principles,<br />
have resulted in a number of successfu l<br />
applications of acoustic techniques to fish<br />
population estimations both in marine and<br />
fresh waters (Truskanov and Scherbino 1966 ;<br />
Cushing 1968; Thorne 1970 ; Thorne and<br />
317
Woodey 1970 ; Thorne, Reeves, and Millika n<br />
1971 ; Moose, Thorne, and Nelson 1971) .<br />
Acoustic Characteristics<br />
of Fish<br />
An echo sounder produces a pulse of sound<br />
from its transducer in the form of a spherically<br />
spreading cone whose dimensions are<br />
dependent on the type and size of the transducer.<br />
The distribution of sound energy transmitted<br />
in different directions is described b y<br />
the directivity pattern function and is maxi -<br />
mum in the direction perpendicular to th e<br />
transducer surface, termed the acoustic axis .<br />
where Ie is the intensity of the reflecte d<br />
sound measured lm from the target ,<br />
and Ii is the intensity incident on th e<br />
target .<br />
Investigations into the relationship betwee n<br />
target strength and fish size indicate that, in<br />
general, the intensity of the echo from a fis h<br />
is proportional to its weight (Cushing et al .<br />
1963 ; Shishkova 1964) .<br />
Data-Acquisition System<br />
The equipment used on the lake studies a t<br />
the University of Washington includes an ech o<br />
sounder incorporated into a system by whic h<br />
target data is recorded on magnetic tape . A<br />
block diagram of the system is shown in<br />
figure 2 . The receiver-transmitter and the<br />
chart recorder is a Ross 200A Fineline ech o<br />
sounder with a frequency of 105 kHz and a<br />
transmitted pulse power of about 500 w . A<br />
transmitter pulse duration of 0.6 msec is<br />
generally used . The receiver amplifier include s<br />
a time-varied-gain circuit of 20 log R, where R<br />
represents depth . This circuit corrects for on e<br />
way spreading loss of signal intensity wit h<br />
depth .<br />
Figure 1 . Typical transducer directivity pattern .<br />
An example of a directivity pattern of a transducer<br />
is shown in figure 1 . A common way to<br />
describe the width of a sound beam is to us e<br />
the half value angle, that is, the angle at whic h<br />
the sound intensity has dropped to one-hal f<br />
(-3 in decibels) of the value it has on th e<br />
acoustic axis. Since the cross-sectional area of<br />
the cone increases with range or depth, the<br />
intensity of the sound within the cone correspondingly<br />
decreases in proportion to th e<br />
square of the depth .<br />
When sound is reflected by a fish target ,<br />
the intensity of the reflected sound is proportional<br />
to the incident sound intensity and is<br />
dependent on characteristics of the fish target.<br />
A measure of the magnitude of the echo<br />
from a fish is the target strength, TS, which i s<br />
defined as<br />
TS = 10 log (Ie/Ii)<br />
Chart<br />
recorde r<br />
Powe r<br />
supply<br />
interface<br />
amplifie r<br />
Receiver<br />
transmitte r<br />
Transduce r<br />
Top e<br />
recorder<br />
I<br />
Oscilloscop<br />
e<br />
Figure 2 . Block diagram of data-acquisition system .<br />
Two modifications of the echo sounder receiver<br />
were made so that it could be usable in<br />
the data collection system . A transistorized<br />
isolation amplifier, which prevents loading of<br />
the echo sounder receiver circuitry by associated<br />
equipment, was built and installe d<br />
318
within the receiver-transmitter unit . The isolation<br />
amplifier couples echo signal data an d<br />
synchronization pulses to the other components<br />
of the system . The second necessary<br />
modification to the receiver was the installation<br />
of a vernier type control that allows precise<br />
adjustment of the receiver gain .<br />
An interface amplifier is used to connec t<br />
the signal output of the echo sounder to th e<br />
input of the tape recorder. A direct connection<br />
between the two units is not possible be -<br />
cause of bandpass limitations of the tap e<br />
recorder. Target data from the output of th e<br />
echo sounder are of a 105 kHz frequency ,<br />
whereas the maximum frequency response of<br />
the tape recorder at unity gain is about 8 kH z<br />
at a tape speed of 3 3%4 IPS. The interface amplifier<br />
converts the 105 kHz output frequenc y<br />
of the echo sounder to a frequency of 5 kH z<br />
by the use of chopper and filter circuits .<br />
The transducer produces about an 8-degre e<br />
circular beam to the 3dB points . The transducer<br />
is generally mounted on a towin g<br />
vehicle suspended from the side of the boat .<br />
The towing vehicle can be used from smal l<br />
outboard vessels as well as large boats, thu s<br />
allowing complete portability of the system .<br />
Survey Design<br />
Surveys are primarily conducted at night ,<br />
since most limnetic-feeding fishes exhibit pronounced<br />
diel behavior patterns. The fish are<br />
generally dispersed in midwater at night bu t<br />
are either on the bottom or schooled i n<br />
deeper water during the day . The number and<br />
spacing of transects depends on the variability<br />
of the population and the degree of accurac y<br />
required. Studies of optimal survey procedures<br />
have not yet been carried out in detail .<br />
Transect design, especially in initial surveys ,<br />
has been governed primarily by the area to b e<br />
covered and the available time . During surveys<br />
of Iliamna Lake, a large sockeye-producing<br />
lake in Alaska, transects were spaced abou t<br />
six miles apart, while in Quinault Lake, a<br />
small sockeye-producing lake in Washington ,<br />
transects were spaced about 3/4 mile apart. In<br />
Lake Washington, where considerable data<br />
have been collected, survey coverage is about<br />
one transect per mile . The primary consideration<br />
in this design was the number of transects<br />
which could be run in a single night . If<br />
greater precision is required, the same transects<br />
are repeated a second night . During<br />
studies of the hake (Merluccius productus)<br />
population in Port Susan, Washington, w e<br />
found that about 40 transects with an average<br />
length of about 3,500 m over a 45 million m 2<br />
area were required to produce a precision o f<br />
about ±15 %, and an additional 40 transects<br />
reduced it to ±10 % (Thorne et al . 1971) .<br />
Basic Techniques<br />
Data Analysis<br />
Techniques of processing acoustic data fo r<br />
abundance estimation can be broken dow n<br />
into two types : echo counting techniques ,<br />
which count the numbers of individual tar -<br />
gets, and echo integration techniques, whic h<br />
relate fish density to integrated target voltage<br />
(Thorne and Lahore 1969) . An examinatio n<br />
of the theoretical variance associated with th e<br />
two techniques has been conducted by Moos e<br />
and Ehrenberg (1971) . Principles of echo integration<br />
and its application to fish populatio n<br />
estimates are described by Thorne (1970 ,<br />
1971), Thorne and Woodey (1970), an d<br />
Thorne, Reeves, and Millikan (1971) . Echo<br />
counting techniques depend on the ability t o<br />
resolve almost exclusively individual fish tar -<br />
gets, thus are limited to relatively low densities.<br />
However, echo counting techniques hav e<br />
the advantage that they may also provide dat a<br />
on size distribution of targets . Applications of<br />
hydroacoustic techniques to lake systems at<br />
the University of Washington have generally<br />
included a combination of the two techniques.<br />
Basic analysis of data is done by integration,<br />
but the integrators are calibrated an d<br />
size information derived by echo counting .<br />
Echo Countin g<br />
Echo counts are made by observation of<br />
specific depth intervals on an oscilloscope<br />
while the tape recording of a transect i s<br />
played back. The transecting boat speed and<br />
sounder pulse rate are such that nearly all fis h<br />
319
targets are insonified several times . The tru e<br />
number of fish is determined by countin g<br />
only the peak echo amplitudes from eac h<br />
series of returns from a single fish (corresponding<br />
to the location of the fish nearest<br />
the acoustic axis) . Counting errors are directl y<br />
proportional to the concentration of fish .<br />
When several fish are observed within th e<br />
counting stratum simultaneously, it is difficult<br />
to keep track of the various targets .<br />
Under these conditions an alternative counting<br />
technique can be used . Instead of counting<br />
every fish target, the number of targets<br />
within the stratum can be noted for randomly<br />
selected pulses, and a mean number of target s<br />
per pulse determined for the transect . This<br />
number can be directly compared with th e<br />
sampling volume of the cone to determine th e<br />
mean density of fish along the transect .<br />
Determination of the Sampling Volum e<br />
The sampling volume of the sounder con e<br />
can be approximated from the directivity pat -<br />
tern. However, the volume is also dependen t<br />
on the size and depth of the fish targets, th e<br />
transmitter power and receiver gain of th e<br />
sounder and the minimum threshold fo r<br />
counting. The sampling volume can be directly<br />
determined from the number of times a<br />
target remains within the sounder cone as th e<br />
boat passes over the fish at a known speed .<br />
The width of the path of a fish through th e<br />
sound cone is determined from the formula<br />
w =<br />
boat speed (meters/sec) times duration in cone (pulses)<br />
pulse rate of sounder (pulses/sec )<br />
where duration is the average number of time s<br />
an individual target is sounded upon . It can b e<br />
shown mathematically that the average length<br />
of parallel chords through a circle is 7r/4 time s<br />
the diameter. Thus the diameter of th e<br />
sounder cone at the depth of the fish target s<br />
is 4/7r times the average path width . The sampling<br />
volume of the cone on a single pulse i s<br />
then the cross-sectional area of the cone (irr 2 )<br />
at the mean depth times the depth interval .<br />
The volume of water surveyed along a transect<br />
is the diameter of the sampling cone a t<br />
the mean depth, times the depth interva l<br />
times the transect length .<br />
Integration Procedure<br />
Since echo counting from the oscilloscop e<br />
is time consuming and its application limited<br />
to lower density situations, basic data processing<br />
is generally done primarily by echo integration.<br />
Determination of integrated voltages<br />
from the data collected on magnetic tape is<br />
done by use of a special integration system<br />
utilizing a small general-purpose computer .<br />
This system, called the Digital Data Acquisition<br />
and Processing System (DDAPS), integrates<br />
voltages from fish targets within several<br />
depth intervals simultaneously and calculate s<br />
the fish abundance using input calibration an d<br />
target strength data (Moose, Green, an d<br />
Ehrenberg 1971) . A block diagram of the<br />
system is shown in figure 3 . An example of<br />
the DDAPS output is shown in figure 4 .<br />
Tap e<br />
playe r<br />
Teletyp e<br />
printer<br />
Digita l<br />
squarin g<br />
circui t<br />
Figure 3 . Block diagram of digital data acquisitio n<br />
Upper limit of<br />
depth interval<br />
system (DDAPS) .<br />
Integrated<br />
(voltage) 2<br />
Rectifie r<br />
and<br />
filte r<br />
PDP- 8<br />
Computer<br />
Fish density<br />
(N/m 3 )<br />
Numbe r of<br />
digital sample s<br />
6 3485 +0 .344950E-04 818 1<br />
12 6489 +13 .642376E-04 828 2<br />
18 38175 +0 .377970E-03 818 1<br />
24 24162 +0 .239227E-03 715 4<br />
30 3394 +0 .336040E-04 5 0<br />
36 0 +0 .000000E+00 0<br />
42 0 +0 .000000E+00 0<br />
48 0 +0 .000000E+00<br />
54 0 +0 .000000E+00<br />
Figure 4 . Example of DDAPS output .<br />
Analog t o<br />
digita l<br />
converte r<br />
Typically the average target strength is no t<br />
known precisely before processing . The density<br />
outputs of DDAPS are thus relative rathe r<br />
than absolute. Conversion to absolute density<br />
can be made either from measurement of tar -<br />
get strengths or by direct comparison of<br />
320
DDAPS output with determinations of absolute<br />
density by echo counting . An example<br />
regression of fish density from echo counts<br />
and integrated voltage is shown in figure 5 .<br />
3 6 9 12 1 5<br />
Fish targets per 1,000 m3<br />
Figure 5 . Relationship between integrated voltag e<br />
and fish density determined from ech o<br />
counts, Lake Washington, August 1971 .<br />
Sampling for Species and Size Compositio n<br />
The data processing methods described t o<br />
this point result in absolute estimates of the<br />
densities of fish targets within various dept h<br />
intervals along the various transects . These<br />
densities can be extrapolated over the respective<br />
volumes represented by the transects to<br />
obtain a total estimate of fish within the lake .<br />
The species and size composition is not derived<br />
directly from the acoustic data and must<br />
be obtained from net samples . Several types<br />
of nets have been applied at the University of<br />
Washington . In Lake Washington, which is<br />
accessible by large vessels, a program of sampling<br />
with a 10-ft Isaacs-Kidd midwater traw l<br />
has been conducted for several years . Development<br />
of midwater trawls for use from tw o<br />
outboard vessels is being conducted for lakes<br />
not accessible by large vessels . Vertical gil l<br />
nets of variable mesh size are also bein g<br />
applied .<br />
Size Determination from Acoustic Data<br />
As stated earlier, the target strength of a<br />
fish is a function of its size. Thus measurement<br />
of the size of the fish echoes gives an<br />
indication of the fish size . Unfortunately, the<br />
size of the fish echo is also dependent on th e<br />
orientation of the fish relative to the inciden t<br />
sound (its aspect) and upon its location with -<br />
in the sounder cone . The average effect of the<br />
directivity pattern can be sorted out, but ,<br />
even so, the variability associated with the<br />
relationship between echo amplitude and fish<br />
size is quite high, and the precision of size<br />
determination by acoustic methods is uncertain<br />
at this stage . It does seem feasible at least<br />
to determine the number of larger fish .<br />
Dawson 1 was able to estimate the number of<br />
adult sockeye in Lake Washington by counting<br />
the large echo targets . The technique<br />
probably can be used to determine the number<br />
of large fish such as squawfish and pea -<br />
mouth chub in lakes . This ability would be<br />
extremely valuable since the large fish are<br />
likely to be undersampled by the midwater<br />
trawls .<br />
Future Modifications<br />
The basic hydroacoustic techniques for fis h<br />
population assessment have been derived an d<br />
are being applied in several lake systems i n<br />
Washington, British Columbia, and Alaska, including<br />
IBP-funded studies of the Coniferou s<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Biome conducted primarily in Lake<br />
Washington and Lake Sammamish . Future<br />
modifications of the technique will be directed<br />
primarily toward refinement of<br />
methods of size discrimination from acousti c<br />
data, and further automation of data processing.<br />
A program for determination of the distribution<br />
of target strengths is presently unde r<br />
development with funding from Sea Gran t<br />
and the National Marine Fisheries Service .<br />
1 J . J . Dawson . Estimation of the 1971 Lake Washington<br />
sockeye salmon escapement by means of a n<br />
echosounder . Informal Progr . Rep . to Wash . Stat e<br />
Dep . Fish ., Univ . Wash . Fish . Res. Inst ., Seattle, 7 p . ,<br />
1971 .<br />
321
This program will automatically calibrate th e<br />
integration program to absolute density, thu s<br />
eliminating the time-consuming echo countin g<br />
procedure . The data on target strength distribution,<br />
compared with the data from ne t<br />
sampling, will provide information on the precision<br />
and reliability which can be obtaine d<br />
from acoustic determination of size .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
Contributions of Dr . R. L. Burgner, Dr . O .<br />
A. Mathisen, Mr . E. P. Nunnallee, and Mr . J .<br />
Dawson to the preparation of the manuscript<br />
are gratefully acknowledged .<br />
The acoustic assessment techniques de -<br />
scribed in this paper have been developed primarily<br />
by an interdisciplinary group under th e<br />
Sea Grant Marine Acoustics Program and sup -<br />
ported in part by National Science Foundation<br />
Grant No . GB-20963 to the Coniferous<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Biome, U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems ,<br />
International Biological Program . This is Contribution<br />
No. 48 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong><br />
Biome .<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Cushing, D . H. 1968 . Direct estimation of a<br />
fish population acoustically . J . Fish. Res .<br />
Board Can . 25(11) : 2349-2364 .<br />
F. R. H . Jones, R . B. Mitson ,<br />
and others. 1963. Measurements of the tar -<br />
get strength of fish . Radio & Electron. Eng .<br />
25 : 299-303 .<br />
Moose, P . H., and J. E . Ehrenberg . 1971 . Variance<br />
of the abundance estimate obtained<br />
with 4 fish echo integrator. J. Fish. Res .<br />
Board Can . 28(9) : 1293-1301 .<br />
, J. Green, and J . E . Ehrenberg .<br />
1971 . Electronic system and data processing<br />
techniques for estimating fish abundance.<br />
Inst. Elec. & Electron. Eng. Conf.<br />
Eng. Ocean Environ . Proc ., p. 33-36 .<br />
, R. E. Thorne, and M . O .<br />
Nelson . 1971 . Hydroacoustic technique s<br />
for fishery resource assessment . Mar . Tech .<br />
Soc . J. 5(6) : 35-37 .<br />
Shishkova, E . V. 1964. Study of acoustical<br />
characteristics of fish . In Modern fishin g<br />
gear of the world, vol . 2, p. 404-409. London:<br />
Fishing News Books, Ltd .<br />
Thorne, R . E. 1970. Investigations into th e<br />
use of an echo integrator for measuring<br />
pelagic fish abundance. 117 p . Ph .D . thesis<br />
on file, Univ . Wash., Seattle .<br />
. 1971 . Investigations into the re -<br />
lation between integrated echo voltage and<br />
fish density. J. Fish. Res. Board. Can.<br />
28(9) : 1269-1273 .<br />
and H. W. Lahore . 1969 . Acoustic<br />
techniques of fish population estimatio n<br />
with special reference to echo integration .<br />
Univ . Wash. Fish . Res . Inst. Circ. 69-10, 1 2<br />
p. Seattle .<br />
, J. E. Reeves, and A . E . Millikan.<br />
1971. Estimation of the Pacific hak e<br />
(Merluccius productus) population in Port<br />
Susan, Washington, using an echo integrator<br />
. J. Fish . Res . Board Can. 28(9) :<br />
1275-1284 .<br />
and J . C. Woodey. 1970. Stoc k<br />
assessment by echo integration and its<br />
application to juvenile sockeye salmon i n<br />
Lake Washington . Univ. Wash. Fish. Res .<br />
Inst. Circ . 70-2, 31 p . Seattle .<br />
Truskanov, M . D ., and M . N . Scherbino. 1966 .<br />
Determination of density of fish concentrations<br />
by means of hydroacoustics. Ryb .<br />
Khoz. (Fish . Econ .) 8 : 38-42 . (U .S. Dep .<br />
C o m m er., Joint Publ. Res. Serv. TT :<br />
66-34723 .)<br />
322 * GPO-796-161
------------- ------ -
The FOREST SERVICE et ; U :' S D partment of Agriculture<br />
is dedicated to the pti lg oaf: mel# ;ease management of the<br />
Natio'h's forest resoi.Mi-it for srrst it ids of wood, water<br />
forage, wildlife, a ecretq: :7h? gh forestry research ,<br />
cooperation with St s `and• 'pri v forest owners, an d<br />
management of the iortiil or sls'an¢! atonal Grasslands, i t<br />
strives - as directett N provide increasingl y<br />
greater service to a growtthfl