09.02.2013 Views

Untitled - Gradina Botanica Iasi

Untitled - Gradina Botanica Iasi

Untitled - Gradina Botanica Iasi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CUPRINS<br />

IFRIM CAMELIA – Aspecte privind morfologia şi particularităţile germinaţiei seminţelor la<br />

câţiva taxoni ai genului Silene L. ......................................................................................... 5<br />

SEDCENCO MARIA, CIORCHINĂ NINA, CLAPA DOINA, FIRA ALEXANDRU –<br />

Conservarea speciei Bellevalia sarmatica (Georgi) Woronov prin metoda cultivării in<br />

vitro ...................................................................................................................................... 11<br />

CIORCHINĂ NINA, ONICA ELISAVETA, ROŞCA ION, DUMITRAŞ ADELINA, CLAPA<br />

DOINA, FIRA AL. –Biologia propagării speciei Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill. ....... 17<br />

MARDARI CONSTANTIN, TĂNASE CĂTĂLIN, DRAGHIA LUCIA, BÎRSAN CIPRIAN –<br />

Unele aspecte referitoare la cultivarea speciei cu valoare decorativă Aconitum degenii<br />

Gáyer .................................................................................................................................... 27<br />

LACZI ENIKŐ, APAHIDEAN ALEXANDRU SILVIU – Cercetări privind introducerea în<br />

cultură a unei specii legumicole puţin cunoscute, în zona Podişului Transilvaniei;<br />

posibilitatea cultivării verzei chinezeşti primăvara devreme în câmp .................................. 33<br />

ANDRO ANCA-RALUCA, BOZ IRINA, PĂDURARIU CLAUDIA, ATOFANI DOINA, COISIN<br />

MAGDA, ZAMFIRACHE MARIA-MAGDALENA – Cercetări biochimice şi fiziologice<br />

comparative la taxoni ai genului Mentha L. ............................................................................. 41<br />

ADUMITRESEI LIDIA, ZAMFIRACHE MARIA MAGDALENA, OLTEANU ZENOVIA,<br />

BOZ IRINA – Observaţii privind pigmenţii asimilatori foliari la trandafiri spontani şi<br />

cultivaţi ................................................................................................................................ 47<br />

BALAEŞ TIBERIUS, TĂNASE CĂTĂLIN – Interrelaţii între sistemele micorizante şi<br />

organismele din sol .............................................................................................................. 55<br />

SHARDA W. KHADE – Caracteristici noi pentru morfotaxonomia speciilor de Gigaspora<br />

aparţinând ciupercilor micorizante arbusculare .................................................................... 71<br />

MANOLIU ALEXANDRU, IRIMIA ROMEO, MIRCEA CORNELIA, ŞPAC ADRIAN –<br />

Compoziţia de uleiuri volatile extrase din frunze de Abies alba Miller parazitate de<br />

Melampsorella caryophyllacearum (DC.) J. Schröt. ............................................................ 81<br />

ŞENILĂ MARIN, ŞENILĂ LĂCRIMIOARA, ROMAN CECILIA – Evaluarea parametrilor de<br />

performanţă pentru analiza elementelor în urme din plante perene utilizând tehnica ICP-<br />

OES ...................................................................................................................................... 87<br />

RADU MIHAI-IULIAN, ŞESAN TATIANA-EUGENIA – Contribuţii la studiul biodiversităţii<br />

macromicetelor din pădurea Bolintin Deal – Giurgiu, România .......................................... 95<br />

CIOCÂRLAN VASILE – Galium ruthenicum Willd. în flora României ......................................... 103<br />

CIOCÂRLAN VASILE – Variabilitatea speciei Cephalaria uralensis (Murray) Roem. et Schult. .... 105<br />

IONIŢA OLGA – Genul Pilosella Hill. în flora Basarabiei ............................................................. 109<br />

CANTEMIR VALENTINA, NEGRU ANDREI, STEPHYRTSA ANA – Poziţia taxonomică şi<br />

distribuţia speciei Buschia lateriflora (DC.) Ovcz. (Ranunculaceae Juss.) în Basarabia ..... 117<br />

SÎRBU CULIŢĂ, OPREA ADRIAN, ELIÁŠ PAVOL jun., FERUS PETER – O nouă contribuţie<br />

la studiul florei adventive din România ................................................................................ 121<br />

PRASAD P. RAMA CHANDRA – Analiza ecologică a familiei Dipterocarpaceae în<br />

ecosistemele forestiere din Andaman, India ......................................................................... 135<br />

DEREVENKO TATIANA – Conservarea ex situ a speciei Saussurea porcii Degen. în Grădina<br />

Botanică a Universităţii Naţionale Y. Fedkovych ................................................................ 151


POONAM BISHT, PRATTI PRASAD, BHAGWATI PRASAD NAUTIYAL – Polygonatum<br />

verticillatum (Linn.) All. şi Polygonatum cirrhifolium (Wall.) Royle: două specii din<br />

Asthaverga ameninţate în Garhwal Himalaya, India ............................................................ 159<br />

POP (BOANCĂ) PĂUNIŢA IULIANA, DUMITRAŞ ADELINA, SINGUREANU VALENTIN,<br />

CLAPA DOINA, MAZĂRE GEORGEL – Rolul ecologic şi estetic al florei spontane în<br />

dezvoltarea peisajelor sustenabile urbane ................................................................................. 169<br />

AABID RASOOL ZARGAR, MEHRAJ A. SHEIKH, MUNESH KUMAR – Încălzirea globală:<br />

implicaţii şi măsuri de adaptare preventive .......................................................................... 179<br />

Aniversalia ........................................................................................................................................ 191<br />

Recenzii ............................................................................................................................................ 193<br />

Ghid către autori ............................................................................................................................... 195


CONTENTS<br />

IFRIM CAMELIA – Aspects regarding seeds morfology and germination peculiarities at some<br />

taxa from Silene L. genera .................................................................................................... 5<br />

SEDCENCO MARIA, CIORCHINĂ NINA, CLAPA DOINA, FIRA ALEXANDRU – The<br />

conservation of species Bellevalia sarmatica (Georgi) Woronov by the vitroculture<br />

method .................................................................................................................................. 11<br />

CIORCHINĂ NINA, ONICA ELISAVETA, ROŞCA ION, DUMITRAŞ ADELINA, CLAPA<br />

DOINA, FIRA AL. – The biology of the propagation of species Schisandra chinensis<br />

(Turcz.) Baill. ....................................................................................................................... 17<br />

MARDARI CONSTANTIN, TĂNASE CĂTĂLIN, DRAGHIA LUCIA, BÎRSAN CIPRIAN –<br />

Some aspects regarding the cultivation of species with decorative value Aconitum degenii<br />

Gáyer .................................................................................................................................... 27<br />

LACZI ENIKŐ, APAHIDEAN ALEXANDRU SILVIU – Research regarding the introduction of<br />

a least known vegetable species in culture, in transylvanian tableland area; The possibility<br />

of cultivating chinese cabbage in early spring in open field ................................................. 33<br />

ANDRO ANCA-RALUCA, BOZ IRINA, PĂDURARIU CLAUDIA, ATOFANI DOINA, COISIN<br />

MAGDA, ZAMFIRACHE MARIA-MAGDALENA – Comparative biochemical and<br />

physiological research on taxa of Mentha L. genus ................................................................... 41<br />

ADUMITRESEI LIDIA, ZAMFIRACHE MARIA MAGDALENA, OLTEANU ZENOVIA,<br />

BOZ IRINA – Observations on the foliar assimilating pigments content for wild and<br />

garden roses .......................................................................................................................... 47<br />

BALAEŞ TIBERIUS, TĂNASE CĂTĂLIN – Interrelations between the mycorrhizal systems and<br />

soil organisms ...................................................................................................................... 55<br />

SHARDA W. KHADE – New characteristics for morphotaxonomy of Gigaspora species<br />

belonging to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi ........................................................................... 71<br />

MANOLIU ALEXANDRU, IRIMIA ROMEO, MIRCEA CORNELIA, ŞPAC ADRIAN –<br />

Composition of the volatile oil extracted from Abies alba Miller leaves parasitized by<br />

Melampsorella caryophyllacearum (DC.) J. Schröt. ............................................................ 81<br />

ŞENILĂ MARIN, ŞENILĂ LĂCRIMIOARA, ROMAN CECILIA – Evaluation of performance<br />

parameters for trace elements analysis in perennial plants using ICP-OES technique ......... 87<br />

RADU MIHAI-IULIAN, ŞESAN TATIANA-EUGENIA – Contribution to the macromycetes<br />

biodiversity from Bolintin Deal forest – Giurgiu, Romania ................................................. 95<br />

CIOCÂRLAN VASILE – Galium ruthenicum Willd. in flora of Romania ...................................... 103<br />

CIOCÂRLAN VASILE – The variability of Cephalaria uralensis (Murray) Roem. et Schult. ....... 105<br />

IONIŢA OLGA – Pilosella Hill genus in the Bessarabia`s flora ...................................................... 109<br />

CANTEMIR VALENTINA, NEGRU ANDREI, STEPHYRTSA ANA – Taxonomical position<br />

and distribution of Buschia lateriflora (DC.) Ovcz. (Ranunculaceae Juss.) species in the<br />

Bessarabia ............................................................................................................................ 117<br />

SÎRBU CULIŢĂ, OPREA ADRIAN, ELIÁŠ PAVOL jun., FERUS PETER – New contribution<br />

to the study of alien flora in Romania .................................................................................. 121<br />

PRASAD P. RAMA CHANDRA – Ecological analysis of Dipterocarpaceae of North Andaman<br />

forest, India ................................................................................................................................. 135<br />

DEREVENKO TATIANA – Ex situ conservation of Saussurea porcii Degen. in Y. Fedkovych<br />

National University Botanic Garden .................................................................................... 151


POONAM BISHT, PRATTI PRASAD, BHAGWATI PRASAD NAUTIYAL – Polygonatum<br />

verticillatum (Linn.) All. and Polygonatum cirrhifolium (Wall.) Royle: two threatened<br />

vital healers from asthaverga nurtured by Garhwal Himalaya, India ................................... 159<br />

POP (BOANCĂ) PĂUNIŢA IULIANA, DUMITRAŞ ADELINA, SINGUREANU VALENTIN,<br />

CLAPA DOINA, MAZĂRE GEORGEL – Ecological and aesthetic role of spontaneous<br />

flora in urban sustainable landscapes development ................................................................... 169<br />

AABID RASOOL ZARGAR, MEHRAJ A. SHEIKH, MUNESH KUMAR – Global warming:<br />

implications and anticipatory adaptive measures ................................................................. 179<br />

Aniversalia ........................................................................................................................................ 191<br />

Book reviews .................................................................................................................................... 193<br />

Guide to authors ............................................................................................................................... 195


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 5-10<br />

5<br />

IFRIM CAMELIA<br />

ASPECTS REGARDING SEEDS MORFOLOGY AND<br />

GERMINATION PECULIARITIES AT SOME TAXA FROM<br />

SILENE L. GENERA<br />

IFRIM CAMELIA 1<br />

Abstract: Genus Silene L. is represented in the Romanian flora by 37 taxa that have different uses or an<br />

endemic species status. Highlighting morphological features of the seeds using light microscope<br />

provides very useful information in clarifying some taxonomic issues, but also in setting up a useful<br />

database for germplasm preservation. Regarding the germination, of interest were germination<br />

percentage and germination speed, plantlets development, the occurrence of the first pair of leaves,<br />

etc. The monitoring this process shows that differences between taxa occur in the early stages of<br />

development.<br />

Key words: Silene, seeds morphology, germination<br />

Introduction<br />

Genus Silene L. is represented in Romanian flora by 37 herbaceous perennial<br />

species; some of them have of medicinal importance (eg. S. vulgaris (Moench) Garcke),<br />

others have decorative uses (eg. S. acaulis (L.) Jacq.), and S. dinarica Sprengel has the<br />

status of endemic species to southern Carpathians [CIOCÂRLAN, 2000]. Information on<br />

seed morphology in the description of the Romanian flora species is in some cases<br />

incomplete (S. viscosa) or missing altogether (S. latifolia subsp. alba, S. nutans subsp.<br />

dubia) [PRODAN, 1953]; for species such as S. latifolia, S. nutans, S. vulgaris more details<br />

are provided in the synthesis works [ДОБРОХОТОВ, 1961]. Thorough knowledge of<br />

structural features is very useful in clarifying taxonomic issues (especially for a botanical<br />

fragmentary material), in preparation for seed storage in germplasm banks or to identify<br />

seeds found in archaeological sites [BAŞLI & al. 2009, GÜNER & al. 2009].<br />

The study of seed germination provides information on germination rate and speed<br />

which is useful for cultivating medicinal and decorative taxa or for monitoring invasive<br />

plant [BLAIR, 2004]. Differences in plantlet morphology arose interest from a theoretical<br />

point of view [CSAPODY, 1968; ВАСИЉЧЕНКО, 1965], but they also have practical use<br />

in agriculture [CIOCÂRLAN, 1975].<br />

Material and methods<br />

The material used in this paper consists of the seeds from seven taxa of the genus<br />

Silene, collected in 2009. The spontaneous taxa come from different locations in Romania,<br />

as follows: Făgăraş Mountains, Sibiu County (Silene acaulis (L.) Jacq. subsp. acaulis,<br />

Silene dinarica Sprengel); Iaşi, Iaşi County (Silene latifolia Poir. subsp. alba (Miller)<br />

Greuter & Burdet, Silene viscosa (L.) Pers., Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke subsp.<br />

1<br />

“Anastasie Fătu” Botanic Garden, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iaşi, Dumbrava Roşie, no. 7-9, Iaşi –<br />

Romania, e-mail: camicris@yahoo.com


ASPECTS REGARDING SEEDS MORFOLOGY AND GERMINATION PECULIARITIES AT SOME …<br />

vulgaris); Rarău Mountains, Suceava County (Silene nutans L. subsp. dubia (Herbich)<br />

Zapal); Broşteni, Suceava County (Silene nutans L. subsp. nutans).<br />

For germination study 100 seeds were selected from each taxon and were placed in<br />

Petri dishes on filter paper moistened with water and maintained under controlled<br />

conditions (21 °C) in the climate chamber in the dark for 35 days (May 27, 2011 - June 29,<br />

2011). All stages of germination were observed, the cracking of the seedcoat, the<br />

emergence of root, the cotyledons, and the first three pairs of leaves. Relevant images<br />

observed with binocular magnifier were photographed using Canon A540 camera.<br />

The study was conducted in the Laboratory of micropropagation and germplasm<br />

preservation of the <strong>Botanica</strong>l Garden, University “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” Iaşi.<br />

Results and discussions<br />

Most of the seeds of species of the genus Silene are of reniform type, but<br />

observation of macro-and micromorphology characteristics of the testa show differences<br />

from one taxon to another. Seed features description was made by well established<br />

parameters used in the literature [FAWZI & al. 2010]. Macromorphological issues pursued<br />

were: shape, color, lateral surface and dorsal surface of the seed. Micromorphological<br />

features of the testa cells in a frontal view were the outline and shape of the anticline and<br />

lateral walls (Fig. 2 A-G). A summary of the light microscope observations is shown in<br />

Tab. 1.<br />

Taxa<br />

Silene acaulis<br />

(L.) Jacq.<br />

subsp. acaulis<br />

Silene latifolia<br />

Poir. subsp.<br />

alba (Miller)<br />

Greuter &<br />

Burdet<br />

Silene dinarica<br />

Sprengel<br />

Silene nutans<br />

L. subsp. dubia<br />

(Herbich) Zapal<br />

Silene nutans<br />

L. subsp.<br />

nutans<br />

Silene viscosa<br />

(L.) Pers.<br />

Silene vulgaris<br />

(Moench)<br />

Garcke subsp.<br />

vulgaris<br />

Tab. 1. Macro- and micromorphological features for 7 taxa of genus Silene<br />

Seed<br />

shape<br />

Seed<br />

colour<br />

Lateral<br />

surface<br />

Dorsal<br />

surface<br />

reniform brown concave convex<br />

6<br />

Testa cell<br />

outline<br />

elongated<br />

polygonal<br />

Anticlinali<br />

walls<br />

reniform brown convex convex polygonal V-undulated<br />

reniform brown flat convex<br />

elongated<br />

polygonal<br />

Periclinal walls<br />

S-undulated flat, smooth<br />

convex, with<br />

tubercle in the<br />

central area<br />

S-undulated convex<br />

reniform brown flat convex polygonal V-undulated<br />

reniform brown flat convex polygonal V-undulated<br />

reniform brown flat<br />

reniform<br />

-circular<br />

brown<br />

flatconcav <br />

flatconvex <br />

flatconvex<br />

polygonal V-undulated<br />

polygonal V-undulated<br />

convex, with<br />

tubercle in the<br />

central area<br />

convex, with<br />

tubercle in the<br />

central area<br />

convex, with<br />

tubercle in the<br />

central area<br />

convex, with<br />

tubercle in the<br />

central area


A B C<br />

IFRIM CAMELIA<br />

D E F<br />

G<br />

Fig. 1. Seed macromorphology for 7 taxa of genus Silene.<br />

A – S. acaulis, B – S. latifolia subsp. alba, C – S. dinarica,<br />

D – S. nutans subsp. dubia, E – S. nutans subsp. nutans,<br />

F – S. viscosa, G – S. vulgaris<br />

Observation of the general appearance of the seeds highlights the species Silene<br />

acaulis for which the impression of smoothness is due to the fact that the grooves next to<br />

the anticline wall are shallow and lacking the tubercles on the anticline walls of the testa<br />

cells. The arrangement of cells on the surface of the testa shows an ordering in concentric<br />

and parallel rows for S. acaulis, S. dinarica, S. nutans subsp. dubia, S. nutans subsp. nutans<br />

and S. vulgaris (Fig. 1 A, C, D, E, G), concentric, but not parallel in S. latifolia subsp. alba<br />

(Fig. 1 B) and unordered in S. viscosa (Fig. 1 G).<br />

Testa cell are approximately the same size across the seed’s surface for S. latifolia<br />

subsp. alba and S. viscosa, while for the other taxa it changes from outside towards the<br />

hilum by tangential elongation. The hilum is embedded in S. acaulis and S. dinarica, while<br />

for the remaining taxa hilum is prominent.<br />

The structure of the seed’s testa is of practical “strategic” relevance being closely<br />

related to the functions it must fulfil: protection, dissemination and water absorption. The<br />

detailed morphological study highlights the theoretical importance of the seeds, as their<br />

characteristics can serve as diagnosis tools for taxonomic problems.<br />

7


ASPECTS REGARDING SEEDS MORFOLOGY AND GERMINATION PECULIARITIES AT SOME …<br />

A<br />

A B B<br />

D E<br />

F<br />

G Fig. 2. Seed micromorphology for 7 taxa of genus Silene.<br />

A – S. acaulis, B – S. dinarica, C – S. latifolia subsp. alba,<br />

D – S. nutans subsp. dubia, E – S. nutans subsp. nutans,<br />

F – S. viscosa, G – S. vulgaris<br />

Ongoing monitoring of the germinating seeds shows differences in the germination<br />

rate and speed of the seeds [INDREA, 2007]. Since the seeds were collected during 2009, a<br />

low germination rate was expected, but the results show that it varied widely, from 82% in<br />

Silene vulgaris, to 52% for S. acaulis and 8% for S. nutans subsp dubia. Germination speed<br />

showed very large variations, being high (5 days) in S. vulgaris and S. acaulis, but reduced<br />

(10 days) in S. nutans subsp. dubia (Fig. 3).<br />

The occurrence of the first pair of leaves was observed after 18 days in S. acaulis<br />

and S. latifolia subsp. alba, but only after 25 days in S. nutans subsp. dubia. The daily<br />

observations of the evolution process of germination showed a uniform germination in S.<br />

viscosa and uneven for S. acaulis. This latter taxon had individuals at very different stages<br />

of germination towards the end of the experiment (Fig. 4).<br />

Comparison of morphological characteristics of the first pair of leaves reveals<br />

notable differences from one taxon to another. Thus, the leaf shape is linear-lanceolate in S.<br />

8<br />

E<br />

C


IFRIM CAMELIA<br />

acaulis, ovate la S. latifolia subsp. alba and S. vulgaris, obovate in S. viscosa; the tip of the<br />

leaf is acuminate in S. acaulis and rounded in most taxa. The most significant differences<br />

concern the distribution, number, shape and size of trichomes (Fig. 5) on the leaf surface.<br />

Number of germinated seeds<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Graphical representation of the speed of germination<br />

31.05.2011<br />

01.06.2011<br />

02.06.2011<br />

03.06.2011<br />

04.06.2011<br />

05.06.2011<br />

06.06.2011<br />

07.06.2011<br />

08.06.2011<br />

09.06.2011<br />

10.06.2011<br />

Date of germination<br />

Silene acaulis (L.) Jacq.<br />

subsp. acaulis<br />

Silene latifolia Poir. subsp.<br />

alba (Miller) greuter & Burdet<br />

Silene dinarica Sprengel<br />

Silene nutans L. subsp.<br />

dubia (Herbich) Zapal<br />

Silene nutans L. subsp.<br />

nutans<br />

Silene viscosa (L.) Pers.<br />

Silene vulgaris (Moench)<br />

Garcke subsp. vulgaris<br />

Fig. 3. Graphical representation of the speed of germination for seven taxa of genus Silene<br />

A B<br />

C D<br />

Fig. 4. Silene acaulis, June 29, different stages of germination. A – root appearance, B – cotyledons<br />

appearance, C – appearance of first pair of leaves, D – plantlet with three pairs of leaves<br />

9


ASPECTS REGARDING SEEDS MORFOLOGY AND GERMINATION PECULIARITIES AT SOME …<br />

E<br />

F<br />

Fig. 5. Morphological characteristics of the first pair of leaves for:<br />

E – Silene acaulis, F – S. latifolia subsp. alba, G – S. viscosa, H – S. vulgaris<br />

Conclusions<br />

Macro- and micromorphological study of the seeds of 7 taxa of the genus Silene may<br />

provide diagnostic characteristics information useful in solving taxonomy problems.<br />

The evolution of germination process varies from one taxa to another and observed<br />

features can be used for obtaining biological material for medicinal, ornamental or<br />

ecological restoration use.<br />

Morphology of seedlings (especially the leaves) highlights the differences between taxa<br />

from the early stages of development, which is useful in the case of invasive plants or weeds.<br />

References<br />

1. BLAIR A. C. & WOLFE L. M. 2004. The evolution of an invasive plant: An experimental study with Silene<br />

latifolia. Ecology, 85(11): 3035-3042.<br />

2. BAŞLI G. A., GYULAI G., TÓTH Z., GÜNER A., SZABÓ Z., MURENYETZ L., YASHINA S. G.,<br />

STAKHOV V. I., HESZKY L. & GUBIN S. V. 2009. Light and scanning electron microscopic analysis of<br />

Silene stenophylla seeds excavated from Pleistocene-Age (Kolyma). Anadolu Univ. J. Sci. Technol., 10(1):<br />

161-167.<br />

3. CIOCÂRLAN V. 2000. Flora ilustrată a României, Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta. Bucureşti: Edit. Ceres, 1138 pp.<br />

4. CIOCÂRLAN V., CHIRILĂ C. & BADEA I. 1975. Determinator de buruieni. Bucureşti: Edit. Ceres, 147 pp.<br />

5. CSAPODY V. 1968. Keimlings-bestimmungsbuch der Dikotyledonen. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.<br />

6. ДОБРОХОТОВ В. Н. 1961. Семена сорных растений. Издат. Сельхозиздат, Москва.<br />

7. FAWZI N. M., FAWZI A. M. & MOHAMED A. A. 2010. Seed morphological studies on some species of Silene<br />

L. (Caryophyllaceae). Int. J. Bot., 6(3): 287-292.<br />

8. GÜNER A., GYULAI G., TÓTH Z., BAŞLI G. A., SZABÓ Z., GYULAI F., BITTSÁNSZKY A., WATERS L.<br />

JR & HESZKY L. 2009. Grape (Vitis vinifera) seeds from antiquity and the Middle Ages excavated in<br />

Hungary-LM and SEM analysis. Anadolu Univ. J. Sci. Technol., 10(1): 205-213.<br />

9. INDREA D. (coord.). 2007. Cultura legumelor. Bucureşti: Edit. Ceres, 607 pp.<br />

10. PRODAN I. 1953. Caryophylaceae. În Flora R.P.R., vol. II. Bucureşti: Edit. Acad. R.P.R.<br />

11. ВАСИЉЧЕНКО И. Т. 1965. Определитељ всходов сорњх растений. Издат. Колос, Ленинград.<br />

10<br />

G<br />

H


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 11-15<br />

SEDCENCO MARIA, CIORCHINĂ NINA, CLAPA DOINA, FIRA ALEXANDRU<br />

THE CONSERVATION OF SPECIES BELLEVALIA SARMATICA<br />

(GEORGI) WORONOV BY THE VITROCULTURE METHOD<br />

SEDCENCO MARIA 1 , CIORCHINĂ NINA 1 , CLAPA DOINA 2 , FIRA ALEXANDRU 2<br />

Abstract: In vitro bulbification is a method by which bulb formation is stimulated and speeded up in the species<br />

that are propagated by bulbs and which need, in the conditions of a classicel culture, a longer period<br />

for the formation of flower-bearing bulbs. In this article, the results of research is presented,<br />

regarding the conservation, multiplication and maintenance of this vulnerable species included in the<br />

Red Book of the Republic of Moldova. This study was carried out in order to re-introduce this<br />

species into its native habitats. Optimal media were elaborated for the initiation, multiplication,<br />

rhyzogenesis and the maintenance of this species in in vitro conditions.<br />

Keywords: conservation, in vitro, multiplication, auxins, cytokinins<br />

Introduction<br />

One of the present problems of contemporary botany is the elaboration of<br />

strategies for the conservation of the diversity of plant species that are in danger of<br />

extinction.<br />

The most successful strategy for long-term protection of biodiversity is the<br />

protection and conservation of the phytocenoses and the populations of the spontaneous<br />

flora – in situ maintenance. But many rare species have reached a certain limit and in situ<br />

conservation alone does not solve the problems of protection against the more and more<br />

frequent anthropogenic factors. In such circumstances the most successful method for the<br />

prevention of the extinction of the species is the maintenance and multiplication of the<br />

respective taxon in artificial conditions that are similar to the natural conditions.<br />

The introduction of the rare and endangered species into culture ensures<br />

conservation, facilitates the study of their biology and development, their ecology, methods<br />

for propagation and, at the same time, ensures the obtention, conservation and cultivation of<br />

planting material and seeds. These methods are of elementary importance for the<br />

repatriation (reintroduction) of these species into their natural ecological niches. The<br />

conservation of intact plant populations and phytocenoses and genetic biodiversity of the<br />

species in botanical gardens offers a multitude of means for the increase of the number of<br />

taxa.<br />

The main and stringent problem related to the conservation of some species is the<br />

elaboration of the strategy that should stop the diminishing of the populations of the<br />

endangered taxons. More and more scientists have the opinion that the biotechnological<br />

methods are extremely efficient for the improvement of the situation, as compared to the<br />

traditional methods of regeneration. Many rare species from the spontaneous flora of the<br />

1<br />

The <strong>Botanica</strong>l Garden (Institute) of the Academy of Sciences of Moldova, Chişinău – Republic of Moldova,<br />

e-mail: m.s.84@mail.ru<br />

2<br />

The Fruit Research Station Cluj, Cluj-Napoca – Romania<br />

11


THE CONSERVATION OF SPECIES BELLEVALIA SARMATICA (GEORGI) WORONOV BY ...<br />

Republic of Moldova are continuously diminishing because of human activities that lead to<br />

the destruction of plant populations and the expansion of invasive species. Bellevalia<br />

sarmatica (Georgi) Woronov is a bulbous decorative species from the steppe included into<br />

the Red Book of the R. of Moldova, protected by the State [NEGRU, 2002]. Until recently,<br />

the steppe areas occupied 2/3 of the entire territory of Moldova. Presently, the natural<br />

steppe populations are maintained as some small territories as areas protected by the State<br />

[TELEUŢĂ, 2002].<br />

The use of in vitro cultures is in itself a conservation method, representing a viable<br />

and efficient alternative for the protection and maintenance of the genetic fund of rare and<br />

endangered species. In bulbous species the increased concentrations of sucrose lead to the<br />

more rapid growth of the explants, such reducing the time necessary for the obtention of<br />

bulbs and the period until the flowering phase [TAKUO & KOJI, 2004].<br />

The aim of the present study was the testing of the reaction in in vitro culture of<br />

the explants prelevated from a mature Bellevalia sarmatica plant in order to initiate tissue<br />

cultures for the medium-term conservation of this species and the induction of the<br />

regeneration process for the obtention of viable plants.<br />

Material and methods<br />

The material used for in vitro culture consisted of flower-bearing bulb explants<br />

taken from mature Bellevalia sarmatica plants that were collected in the Budjac<br />

Reservation in June 2010.<br />

One of the main conditions for successful microcloning is the sterilization of the<br />

explant [CAVALLINI & al. 1987]. The explants prelevated from the donor material (bulb,<br />

bulb fragments) were washed under running tap water for 15 minutes. The pre-sterilization<br />

was carried aut in a solution of KMnO4 (0.05%) + Tween-20 for 10 minutes. Sterilization<br />

was done with diacid (0.01%) solution for 6-7 minutes, followed by 3 rinses with sterile<br />

distilled water. After the disinfection of plant material, the explants were inoculated on the<br />

culture media, in large or small flasks depending on the size of the prelevated fragments, so<br />

as the newly formed bulbs should have enough space for development.<br />

For the study of the reactivity of this species in in vitro culture, several variants of<br />

culture media were tested, all of them with the macro- and microelements according to the<br />

MS [MURASHIGE & SCOOG, 1962] formula, presented in Tab. 1.<br />

The introduction into in vitro culture was done in nutritive media with various<br />

concentrations of plant hormones. For the initiation of in vitro cultures, media with low<br />

concentrations of auxins and cytokinins were tested (variants B-1, B-2, B-3). For rapid bulb<br />

development and root formation two variants of media were tested (B-6, B-9). As carbon<br />

source, sucrose was used. All the culture media were gelled with 6 g/l agar. The pH of the<br />

media was adjusted to 5.8 before autoclavation.<br />

Results and discussions<br />

The first evident observations were done after 4 weeks, when it was found that a<br />

large number of explants generated small protuberances, similar to 0.5 mm bulbils.<br />

The testing of the three variants of media for culture initiation (Tab. 1)<br />

evidentiated the fact that the optimal medium for this phase was the one that contained MS<br />

(1962) macro- and microelements as basal medium and 1.0 mg/l–6-benzylamilopurine<br />

12


SEDCENCO MARIA, CIORCHINĂ NINA, CLAPA DOINA, FIRA ALEXANDRU<br />

(BAP) and 0.25 mg/l - α-naphtylacetic acid (NAA) and 30 g/l sucrose (B-1). After 6 weeks<br />

of culture, 10-12 bulbs/explant were obtained, with a diameter of about 3.0 mm (Fig. 1, a).<br />

On the B-2 medium, with a lower BAP concentration (0.5 mg/l) feweer bulbs fewer bulbs<br />

were formed (7-9 bulbs/explant). Regeneration also took place on the medium with Kinetin<br />

(B-3), but in a lower percentage (4-6 bulbils/explant). The first de novo regenerated bulbils<br />

on this medium were noticed after 8 weeks in culture. This fact demonstrates that the<br />

presence of BAP leads to a better growth of isolated tissues and better organogenesis as<br />

compared to the variants with Kinetin [VOINOV & al. 2009]<br />

The bulbs obtained were transferred onto culture media with higher concentrations<br />

of plant hormones and sucrose. On the media with increased concentration of sucrose a<br />

more rapid growth of bulbils was observed and there the bulbs had the largest diameters, of<br />

14-17 mm. After two weeks of culture on B-6, B-9 media the bulbs formed roots and<br />

leaves. Between the two variants of media, B-6 and B-9 there were no significant<br />

differences regarding growth and organogenesis, so that for this stage the B-6 medium with<br />

60 g/l sucrose can be recommended (Fig. 1, b).<br />

The bulbs that were regenerated in vitro were acclimated ex vitro and successfully<br />

transferred to ex vitro conditions. Acclimatization was carried aut in conditions of<br />

controlled climate regarding humidity and temperature, in peat and perlite mixture, for 14<br />

days. The survival rate was of 100% and plant growth and development continued.<br />

The results obtained in this species are promising, so the method of vitrocultures<br />

will be extended for other important and endangered taxons from the spontaneous flora,<br />

which is constantly diminishing and necessitates protection.<br />

Conclusions<br />

On the basis of our research we can conclude that:<br />

For the sterilization of plant material (bulbs) for the initiation of in vitro culture of<br />

species Bellevalia sarmatica (Georgi) Woronow it is recommended to use disinfection with<br />

KMnO4 (0.05%) + Tween-20 for 10 minutes and diacid (0.01%) solution for 6-7 minutes.<br />

On the basal MS medium supplemented with BАP and NAA at the concentrations<br />

of 1.0 mg/l and respectively 0.25 mg/l the best results were obtained regarding the<br />

efficiency of microcloning and morphogenic potential.<br />

The optimal medium for rhyzogenesis and rapid growth was MS basal medium<br />

supplemented with BАP (1.0 mg/l), NAA (1.0 mg/l) and sucrose at the concentration of 60 g/l.<br />

For the acclimation of bulbs the optimal conditions were found and the time for<br />

flower-bearing bulb formation was reduced with 1-2 years.<br />

The protocol for micropropagation and medium-term maintenance in in vitro culture<br />

can be successfully used for the conservation of the endangered species Bellevalia sarmatica<br />

(Georgi) Woronow. Applying this method ensures the possibility of obtaining homogenous<br />

planting material in large amounts in a short period of time and in limited space.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

This work was supported by ANCS Romania, project number 425/2010, Bilateral<br />

Cooperations.<br />

13


THE CONSERVATION OF SPECIES BELLEVALIA SARMATICA (GEORGI) WORONOV BY ...<br />

References<br />

1. NEGRU A., ŞABANOV G. & al. 2002. Plantele rare din flora spontana a Republicii Moldova. CE USM,<br />

Chişinău.<br />

2. TELEUŢĂ A. 2002. Strategia Naţională şi planul de acţiune în domeniul conservării diversităţii biologice,<br />

Republica Moldova Chişinău.<br />

3. TAKUO F. & KOJI N. 2004. Rapid Production of Lilium auratum Bulbs from Zygotic Embryos. Asia Pacific<br />

Journal of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, 12: 39-42.<br />

4. Н. А. ВОЙНОВ, Т. Г. ВОЛОВА и др. 2009. Современные проблемы и методы биотехнологии.<br />

Красноярск ИПК СФУ, Стр. 415 pp.<br />

5. CAVALLINI A., LUPI M. C., CREMONINI R. & BENNICI A. 1987. In vitro culture of Bellevalia romana<br />

(L.) Rchb. Protoplasma: 66-70.<br />

6. MURASHIGE T. & SCOOG. F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue<br />

culture. Physiol. Plant, 15: 473-497.<br />

14


SEDCENCO MARIA, CIORCHINĂ NINA, CLAPA DOINA, FIRA ALEXANDRU<br />

Tab. 1. The composition of the nutritive media for the microclonal propagation of species<br />

Bellevalia sarmatica<br />

Media for culture<br />

initiation<br />

Media for rapid<br />

development<br />

Variants Basal medium Supplementary additives<br />

B-1 МS-100%<br />

B-2 МS-100%<br />

B-3 МS-100%<br />

B-6 МS-100%<br />

B-9 МS-100%<br />

15<br />

1.0 mg/l BAP<br />

0.25mg/l NAA<br />

30 g/l sucrose<br />

0.5 mg/l BAP<br />

0.25 mg/l NAA<br />

30 g/l sucrose<br />

0.5 mg/l kinetin<br />

0.25 mg/l IAA<br />

30 g/l sucrose<br />

1.0 mg/l BAP<br />

1.0 mg/l NAA<br />

60 g/l sucrose<br />

1.0 mg/l BAP<br />

1.0 mg/l NAA<br />

90 g/l sucrose<br />

Fig. 1. The in vitro culture of species Bellevalia sarmatica on B-1 medium (a) and B-6 medium (b)


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 17-26<br />

17<br />

CIORCHINĂ NINA & al.<br />

THE BIOLOGY OF THE PROPAGATION OF SPECIES<br />

SCHISANDRA CHINENSIS (TURCZ.) BAILL.<br />

CIORCHINĂ NINA 1 , ONICA ELISAVETA 1 , ROŞCA ION 1 , DUMITRAŞ ADELINA 2 ,<br />

CLAPA DOINA 3 , FIRA ALEXANDRU 3<br />

Abstract: The paper presents aspects regarding the possibilities for the propagation of species Schisandra<br />

chinensis (Turz.) Baill, as well as its reaction in the pedo-climatic conditions of the Republic of<br />

Moldova. Situated in the Lianarium of the <strong>Botanica</strong>l Garden (Institute) AŞM since 1975, Schisandra<br />

chinensis (Turcz.) Baill. grows, develops and fructifies abundantly every year. It is propagated<br />

vegetatively and generatively with some difficulty. In the case of generative propagation, in order to<br />

obtain a high germination percentage, the seeds are stratified in three phases, at different<br />

temperatures and are sown in spring. Germination percentages of 80-90% were obtained. Schisandra<br />

chinensis is also propagated by greenwood cuttings, semi-hardwood or hardwood cuttings, by<br />

layering or by division. The best results were obtained by using semi-hardwood and hardwood<br />

cuttings taken in summer, in June-July, from younger plants. The potential for in vitro propagation of<br />

this species was also tested. The explants consisting of apical meristems inoculated on MS medium +<br />

0.5 mg/l BAP evolved the best.<br />

Key words: propagation, cutting, climber, medicinal plant, Schisandraceae<br />

Introduction<br />

The pedoclimatic conditions of the Republic of Moldova are relatively favourable<br />

for non-traditional fruit shrubs which, as they easily adapt to the environment they can be<br />

successfully introduced into culture. Also, on the market in the republic of Moldova there is<br />

an increasing interest for the introduction into culture of some new plant species from the<br />

spontaneous flora. One of these species is the Magnolia vine – Schisandra chinensis (Turz.)<br />

Baill., a perennial climber from Family Schisandraceae.<br />

Utilization. This species is utilized as an ornamental and medicinal plant. As an<br />

ornamental plant it is a decorative climber used for decorating balconies, terraces and<br />

buildings.<br />

The majority of vegetative and generative organs contain many biologically active<br />

substances, but the most important one is schizandrine and its derivatives. In the leaves and<br />

fruits there are, in a higher amount, the vitamins C and B (580 mg/%), catequins, organic<br />

acids, ketones (18%); tannic substances; sugars (15%). The seeds contain 33% oils. The<br />

fruits, leaves, bark and seeds are used. The infusion obtained from leaves, shoots and fruits<br />

is used for stimulating the vitality of the body as a whole, for stimulating the activity of the<br />

heart, for calming the nervous system. The extract, decoction, tincture prepared from fruits<br />

and seeds is used for treating tuberculosis, bronchytic asthma, gastritis, hepatitis, kidneys,<br />

dysenteria in children and other diseases that cause the weakening of the organism. The<br />

juice, the fresh fruits as well as the tincture from the leaves, fruits and shoots is used as an<br />

1 The <strong>Botanica</strong>l Garden (Institute) AŞM, Chişinău – Republic of Moldova, e-mail: ninaciorchina@mail.ru<br />

2 University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca – România<br />

3 Fruit Research Station Cluj, Cluj-Napoca – România


THE BIOLOGY OF THE PROPAGATION OF SPECIES SCHISANDRA CHINENSIS (TURCZ.) BAILL.<br />

immunomodulator of the body, for increasing intellectual as well as physical working<br />

capacity, for eyesight and for strengthening the body. The tea from leaves and shoots has a<br />

pleasant flavour similar to that of lemon and it has a slightly sour taste.<br />

The essential oils extracted from this plant are used for decreasing the glucide content of<br />

the blood. The use of Schisandra chinensis fruits in small amounts is recommended for<br />

people that suffer from insomnia, who have psychical problems or high arterial blood<br />

pressure and dysfunctions of heart activity.<br />

The fruits are also used in the cosmetic industry and food industry (confectionery,<br />

marmelades, chocolates), in the production of soap and detergents.<br />

Spread. The Magnolia vine can be found mostly in mixed forests in the Far East,<br />

mostly on the river banks in China, Japan, Sachalin Islands, and in the Republic of<br />

Moldova in Soroca, Chişinău. It is cultured by some amateurs and it can be found in<br />

several botanical gardens worldwide.<br />

Ecological requirements. It withstands low temperatures and shaded places. It<br />

grows fast. It can be cultured on sandy soils. On soils rich in humus it develops better. It<br />

does not withstand acidic, dense, compact soils.<br />

Morpho-biological peculiarities. Schisandra chinensis is a climber that can reach<br />

heights of 14-15 m and 1.5-2 cm in thickness. The roots are branched, situated close to soil<br />

surface. The shoots, the roots and the fruits are smelling. The stem of this climber is dark<br />

brown in colour and can reach 2 cm in thickness and winds around the trellis in clockwise<br />

direction. The leaves are altern, ovate, 5-10 cm in length, the petiole is reddish. The flowers<br />

are white, aromatic, they have a pinkish nuance towards the end of flowering. The fruits are<br />

of an intense red colour, juicy, sour, spherical, 5-10 mm in length, usually with one seed.<br />

The buds are mixed, oval in shape, a little lengthened and pointed. Flowering and fruiting<br />

takes place on the annual shoots (Fig.1).<br />

Propagation. The Magnolia vine is propagated vegetatively and generatively with<br />

great difficulty. It is propagated by cuttings, layering, division and by seeds [GLUKHOV &<br />

al. 2000; KHROMOVA, 1980; TITLYANOV, 1969]. The seeds are sown quickly in the<br />

autumn after harvest or in spring after stratification.<br />

There are few scientific papers regarding the micropropagation of Schisandra<br />

sinesnsis. Micropropagation has been done by using nodal explants [STANIENĖ &<br />

STANYS, 2007], cotiledonary nodes from seeds germinated in vitro [HONG & al. 2004],<br />

somatic embryogenesis starting from zygotic embryos [CHEN & al. 2010, SMÍŠKOVÁ &<br />

al. 2005] and embryogenesis starting from unopened flower buds [YANG & al. 2011].<br />

Material and methods<br />

The plant material used in the experiments was in the Lianarium of the <strong>Botanica</strong>l<br />

Garden (Institute) AŞM, where Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill. grows, develops and<br />

fruits abundantly every year, after its introduction into the collections in 1975 and also from<br />

the experimental field of the Laboratory of Embriology and Biotechnology.<br />

Experiments were carried out regarding the possibility for the propagation of this<br />

species by seeds, by cuttings and by micropropagation.<br />

Observations were done regarding the growth and development of the species in<br />

the conditions of the Republic of Moldova as well as experiments regarding the<br />

possibilities for the propagation of this species.<br />

18


19<br />

CIORCHINĂ NINA & al.<br />

For propagation by seeds, before sowing the seeds were stratified in 3 phases: the<br />

first phase for 30 days at t = 18-20 °C, then 30 days at t = 3-5 °C and the third phase, for<br />

two months at t = 8 - 10 °C.<br />

For vegetative propagation the collecting and making of cuttings was carried out in<br />

summer, at the end of June and a the beginning of July when the shoots of the mother plant<br />

start to lignify. Lignified as well as semi-hardwood cuttings were made using well<br />

sharpened instruments, and the time for harvesting the shoots was in the morning. The<br />

cuttings had 12-15 cm in length, with 2-3 nodes.<br />

For propagation by hardwood cuttings the cuttings were made in February and<br />

March before the beginning of the vegetation period. The cuttings were kept in sand and<br />

sawdust until the danger of frost at ground level passed and then they were planted into<br />

cold frames.<br />

The cuttings were subjected to treatment with a weak (pink in colour) solution of<br />

KMnO4 and with growth regulators, with IBA at 0.005% for a period of 16 hours or with<br />

IAA at 0.01% for a period of 5 hours [HROMOVA, 1980]. They were planted into cold<br />

frames into two substrates: sand or sand + peat in a ratio of 1:1 and minimum 24% artificial<br />

mist. After one year the cuttings were planted into containers or in the open field.<br />

Having in view that by generative propagation some qualities specific to the<br />

mother plant appear or disappear and vegetative propagation presents some difficulty, the<br />

initiation of in vitro cultures was tested for this species.<br />

The plant material consisted in various explant types: apical meristems, lateral<br />

meristems of the 2 nd , 3 rd , 4 th , 5 th and 6 th degree, fragments of juvenile leaves, shoot<br />

fragments from the apical part, shoot fragments with lateral meristem, Fragments of young<br />

leaves with veins, ovules, ovary with a fragment from the stem, stem fragment with the<br />

apical meristem. For culture initiation nine experimental variants were tested, with MS<br />

(1962) basal medium and various concentrations of plant hormones (Tab. 1).<br />

The operations were carried out according to the standard laboratory procedures.<br />

Results and discussions<br />

.<br />

The research and observations carried out in a period of several years in various<br />

ecological conditions show that Schisandra chinensis develops differently according to the<br />

zone. It was found that Schisandra prefers rich, humid, loose soil and zones of shadow. In<br />

the sunny places in the Republic of moldova growth is inhibited. It does not withstand<br />

drought and high air temperatures in the period of vegetation. It is resistant to frost. It<br />

withstands temperatures even as low as -45 o C. In the drought-stricken years, irrigation and<br />

soil loosening is necessary. Fertilization or the addition of chernozem to the roots of the<br />

plants is recommended. Growth per decade is about 20 cm.<br />

The root system is superficial and can reach to depths of 25 cm. The young shoots<br />

are greenish-grey and, as they mature, they become reddish-brown. The plant is<br />

monoecious, the flowers are monosexuate. In the conditions of the Republic of Moldova it<br />

flowers in May-June. Since the beginning of bud development until their sprouting there is<br />

a period of 11-17 days. The flowering period is of 15-19 days. The fruits fully mature in<br />

14-21 days. The flowers that have strong flavour are small, up to 1.5 cm, grouped 3-5 at the<br />

axils of the leaves, on flexible, thin peduncles 1-4 cm in length. The flowers are white, with<br />

pink nuances and they develop on the annual shoots. The flower formula is ♂*P3+3+3A∞[4],


THE BIOLOGY OF THE PROPAGATION OF SPECIES SCHISANDRA CHINENSIS (TURCZ.) BAILL.<br />

or ♀♂ *P Co 6-9 A(3-7) G 30-40 [5] . The Magnolia vine sets fruit starting from the age of 4-5<br />

years.<br />

Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill. is characterized by rapid shoot growth in<br />

june-July and towards the end of August growth diminishes. Its leaves fall down right<br />

from the beginning of September. In the meteorological conditions of the Republic of<br />

Moldova the species has a period of profound dormancy, which confers resistance to low<br />

temperatures during winter and and to late frosts in spring. In late spring the plant enters<br />

the vegetation period, which has a duration of 175-190 days depending upon the<br />

meteorological conditions of the year (sum of temperatures and amount of precipitations).<br />

Another factor that favourizes the development of this species is the presence of phreatic<br />

water at shallow depths.<br />

Propagation by seeds. 1000 seeds weigh 25 g. Seed stratification in the three<br />

phases at different temperatures ensures a germination percentage of 80-90%. The plants<br />

obtained in this way have well developed roots and will set fruit at the age of 4-5 years<br />

(Fig. 2). 2-3 year old seedlings need protection during winter. But in Schisandra chinensis<br />

(Turcz.) Baill. as well as in other fruit shrubs obtained by generative propagation some<br />

specific qualities of the mother plant may appear or disappear.<br />

In order to keep the characteristics and qualities of the cultivar, vegetative<br />

propagation by cuttings is recommended (Fig. 3). The advantage of propagation by cuttings<br />

is that the cuttings are selected from healthy, vigorous and productive plants and plant<br />

material with the same characteristics is obtained.<br />

The rooting capacity of the cuttings also depends on the biological features of each<br />

species, soil conditions and the special interventions for stimulating the cuttings. Such, in<br />

the process of root formation, some hormones like auxin stimulate growth, which can also<br />

be achieved artificially by treating the cuttings with stimulating substances, for example<br />

heteroauxin. The success of the culture of cuttings depends upon the amount of nutritive<br />

substances that they contain and the conditions offereed to them when planting – a well<br />

prepared, loosened, fertile, well aerated soil and sufficient humidity.<br />

The roots of the cuttings result from the root rudiments, which are groups of<br />

meristematic cells localized in the contact point of the medullary rays with the cambium.<br />

The root rudiments are formed long the axis of the shoot, with higher densities at the base<br />

of the shoot, close to the axillary buds.<br />

As a result of the cut made by making the cutting from the harvested shoot, a<br />

primary parenchimatic tissue named callus is formed, which has the role of cicatrizing the<br />

wound and which, later, forms a cambium with adventitious buds from which the roots<br />

develop. Until the formation of roots, the cuttings consumes the nutritive substances from<br />

its own reserves.<br />

The cuttings are made from the sunny part of the plant, from the lower and midle<br />

part of the vine. The leaf lamina is shortened with 1/3-1/2 in order to decrease transpiration.<br />

A higher percentage (with 10-12%, as compared to the untreated ones) of rooting was<br />

obtained in the cuttings treated for 24 hours with 0.01% heteroauxin and stuck into the<br />

substrate to a depth of 2-3 cm. In the first 3-4 weeks the cuttings should be watered 2-3<br />

times a day, and then once a day, then 1-2 times a week. The rooting percentage of the<br />

cuttings was of 40-50%. It was found that the rooting percentage of the cuttings taken from<br />

young plants was of 57-60 %, whereas from older plants 45-50%.<br />

Propagation by hardwood cuttings (winter cuttings) in cold frames needs a well<br />

processed substrate, loosened to the depth of 40 cm, with rich aeration and humidity. The<br />

20


21<br />

CIORCHINĂ NINA & al.<br />

cuttings were harvested in February and March before the beginning of the vegetation<br />

period. The cuttings were kept in sand and sawdust until the danger of frost at ground level<br />

passed, then they were planted in cold frames. During the insertion of the cuttings into the<br />

substrate, the cutting has to adhere well to the particles of the substrate and for this purpose<br />

the substrate has to be well prepared and loosened so as to prevent the bruising and<br />

wounding of the cutting.<br />

Burying the cuttings into the substrate is done vertically, with the buds upwards<br />

and at 1-2 cm below substrate level, so as to prevent the drying out of the tips of the<br />

cuttings. Harvesting the shoots for making the cuttings is done from special cultures of<br />

mother plants. One year old shoots are harvested, from which the cuttings are made with a<br />

well-sharpened knife. The cuttings should be straight, well formed, they should have at<br />

least 2 buds, without mechanical lesions. The length of the cuttings was of minimum 15-20<br />

cm and the thickness 8-20 mm at the upper end. For making the cuttings, the upper part of<br />

the shoots, which is not sufficiently lignified, should not be used. The cuts should be<br />

smooth, perpendicular on the axis of the shoot, without cracks and bark exfoliations. The<br />

cut at the upper end should be at 1-2 cm above the bud.<br />

After being cut, the cuttings should be put into KMnO4 solution and then<br />

immediately fixed into sand in vertical or slightly bent position, leaving the upper end at 1<br />

cm above the sand, placed into the greenhouse or cold frame, where humid air should be<br />

provided to them, as well as the free access of oxygen to their basal end and an optimal<br />

regime of heat and light. These conditions can be ensured by the correct construction of the<br />

cold frame, by inserting the cuttings at 0.5-1.0 cm into the sand, by moderate and gradual<br />

watering of the sand and by providing a constant temperature of 20-26 °C.<br />

For constructing the cold frame, one should take care that between the surface of<br />

the sand and the window of the cold frame there should be 12-15 cm of space. Before<br />

inserting the cuttings the sand should be watered abundantly with boiling water and with<br />

KMnO4 solution. The cuttings should be put at distances of 6-10 cm between the rows and<br />

4-5 cm in the row. Immediately after inserting the cuttings, fine spraying is applied and the<br />

frame is covered completely.<br />

The cold frames should be shaded in such a way that only diffuse light should<br />

enter (sparsely knitted mats or staves are used, which should cover 1/3 of the surface of the<br />

frame). The cuttings should be sprayed 3-5 times in the sunny days and 1-2 times in the<br />

cloudy days and in the evening the weeds and the blackened cuttings should be pulled out.<br />

After rooting, the frames should be opened gradually, so that the plantlets get<br />

accustomed to the outer environment and then kept open permanently and watering should<br />

be done until October. The cuttings which have grown good roots until October should be<br />

taken out and transferred into the nursery or into containers and they should be watered and<br />

shaded during warm days. If they do not have well developed roots in October, the cuttings<br />

should be kept in the cold frame, covered with sawdust, until spring.<br />

The root system of the cuttings is relatively poorly developed and one should keep<br />

in mind that the roots reach to a depth of just 15-20 cm under ground level.<br />

The length of the first-order root system in the plants obtained from semihardwood<br />

cuttings reach to 2-5 cm in length from summer till next spring.<br />

In the conditions of the <strong>Botanica</strong>l Gardens, propagation by softwood cuttings did<br />

not give good results, only 1% of the softwood cuttings rooted. In the case of propagation<br />

by root cuttings, the resulting plants are poorly developed.


THE BIOLOGY OF THE PROPAGATION OF SPECIES SCHISANDRA CHINENSIS (TURCZ.) BAILL.<br />

In vitro propagation. In Tab. 1 the nine variants of nutritive media are presented,<br />

all of them with 100% MS as basal medium [MURASHIGE & SKOOG, 1962].<br />

In Tab. 2 are presented the results of testing various explants under the influence<br />

of auxins and cytokinins present in the nutritive media. The explants consisting of apical<br />

meristems had the best reaction on the variants MS -100% with 0.5 mg/l BAP, resulting<br />

44.40% viable plantlets and MS-100% + 0.5 mg/l BAP, 0.1 mg/l NAA, resulting 36.30%<br />

viable plantlets (Fig. 4).<br />

The following explant types also reacted positively: shoot fragment from the<br />

apical part, shoot fragment with apical meristem. The reaction of all the explant types on<br />

the nine variants of media is presented in Tab. 2.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill. is a species that has adapted to the<br />

pedoclimatic conditions in the republic of Moldova.<br />

It can be propagated generatively or vegetatively.<br />

In the case of propagation by seed it is recommended to stratify the seeds in three<br />

phases: I - for 30 days at t = 18-20 °C, II- 30 days at t = 3-5 °C and III- 60 days at t = 8-<br />

10°C and then the seeds should be sown, such ensuring 80-90% germination.<br />

As a result of the process of propagation by hardwood and semi-hardwood<br />

cuttings, uniform genetic material is obtained, healthy, vigorous plantlets that posess the<br />

features and qualities of the mother plant. The rooting of the cuttings depends on several<br />

factors: the quality of the cuttings and of the substrate, The conditions for the growth and<br />

development of the mother plants, respecting the optimal timeframes for propagation by<br />

cuttings and correctly applying the technology of propagation by cuttings, the density of<br />

the cuttings in the cold frame etc. For obtaining a higher rooting percentage of Schisandra<br />

chinensis (Turcz.) Baill. It is necessary to select the shoots from young plants, which were<br />

also obtained by vegetative propagation, in the 20 th of June-10 th of July, which coincides<br />

with the end of flowering and the beginning of fruit set.<br />

The optimal substrate for the vegetative propagation of Schisandra chinensis<br />

(Turcz.) Baill. is made up of sand + peat 1:1.<br />

Among the rhyzogenesis stimulators used for rooting the semi-hardwood<br />

Schizandara chinensis (Turcz.) Baill. cuttings, it was established that the stimulators IBA<br />

and IAA-0,01% plus sucrose at 10 g/l concentration stimulate rooting.<br />

The plants obtained from cuttings as well as the ones obtained from seeds are very<br />

sensitive to low temperatures in the spring in the first years, hence the plants must be<br />

protected by leaves.<br />

Among the 10 types of explants tested for in vitro culture initiation in Schisandra<br />

chinensis (Turcz.) Baill, the apical meristems reacted the best, especially on the variant<br />

with MS medium + 0.5mg/l BAP (44.44% viable plantlets obtained). The explants<br />

consisting of shoot fragments from the apical part and shoot fragments with apical<br />

meristem also had positive reaction.<br />

Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill. can be recommended in the range of species<br />

used for setting up green areas, as it is a robust climber, with decorative value during the<br />

whole year and also used as a medicinal plant with multiple active and stimulating<br />

substances, with a wide range of applicability.<br />

22


23<br />

CIORCHINĂ NINA & al.<br />

Acknowledgements. This work was supported by ANCS Romania, project<br />

number 425/2010 Bilateral Cooperations.<br />

References<br />

1. CHEN A. H., YANG J. L., NIU Y. D., YANG C. P., LIU G. F., YU C. Y. & LI C. H. 2010. High-frequency<br />

somatic embryogenesis from germinated zygotic embryos of Schisandra chinensis and evaluation of<br />

the effects of medium strength, sucrose, GA3, and BA on somatic embryo development. Plant Cell Tiss<br />

Organ Cult., 102: 357–364, doi 10.1007/s11240-010-9740-6.<br />

2. GLUKHOV A. Z., KOSTYRKO D. R. & KRAVCHENKO N. M. 2000. Non-traditional ornamental plants<br />

in anthropogenically transformed environment, NASU, Donetsk Bot. Sad, Donetsk. C. 128.<br />

3. HONG M. H., KIM O. T., PARK I. I. & HWANG B. 2004. Micropropagation of Schizandra chinensis<br />

Baillon using glucose from cotyledonary nodes. Journal of Plant Biology, 47(3): 270-274.<br />

4. MURASHIGE T. & SKOOG F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue<br />

culture. Physiol. Plant, 15: 473-497.<br />

5. SMÍŠKOVÁ A., VLAŠÍNOVÁ H. & HAVEL L. 2005. Somatic embryogenesis from zygotic embryos of<br />

Schisandra chinensis. Biologia Plantarum, 49(3): 451-454.<br />

6. STANIENĖ G. & STANYS V. 2007. Micropropagation of Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill, Sodininkyste<br />

ir Darzininkyste, ISSN: 0236-4212, 26(3): 282-288.<br />

7. TITLYANOV A. A. 1969. Actinidia and Magnolia vine. Vladivostok.175 pp.<br />

8. KHROMOVA T. V. 1980. Guidelines for the reproduction of introduced woody plants by cuttings. M. 45S.<br />

9. YANG J. L., NIU Y. D., YANG C. P., LIU G. F. & LI C. H. 2011. Induction of somatic embryogenesis from<br />

female flower buds of elite Schisandra chinensis. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult, 106: 391–399. doi<br />

10.1007/s11240-011-9935-5.


THE BIOLOGY OF THE PROPAGATION OF SPECIES SCHISANDRA CHINENSIS (TURCZ.) BAILL.<br />

a b<br />

Fig. 1. Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill. a) The flowering phase; b) The fruiting phase<br />

Fig. 2. Propagation by seeds<br />

24<br />

Fig. 3. Propagation by cuttings


45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

16,67 15,38<br />

10<br />

0<br />

36,36<br />

25<br />

5,6<br />

7,14<br />

CIORCHINĂ NINA & al.<br />

15,38<br />

B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 B-5 B-6 B-7 B-8 B-9<br />

Fig. 4. The reaction of the apical meristems on the nine variants of media (%)<br />

44,44<br />

Tab. 1. The composition of the nutritive media for the microclonal propagation of species<br />

Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill.<br />

Variants Basal medium Supplementary additives<br />

B-1 МS-100%<br />

B-2 МS-100%<br />

B-3 МS-100%<br />

B-4 МS-100%<br />

B-5 МS-100%<br />

B-6 МS-100%<br />

B-7 МS-100%<br />

B-8 МS-100%<br />

Kin - 0.5 mg/l<br />

NAA- 0.1mg<br />

Kin -1.0 mg/l<br />

IAA – 0.5 mg/l<br />

Kin – 0.5 mg/l<br />

IAA – 0.1 mg/l<br />

Kin – 2.0 mg/l<br />

IAA– 0.5 mg/l<br />

BAP – 0.5 mg/l<br />

NAA -0.1 mg/l<br />

BAP – 0.5 mg/l<br />

GA³ – 0.5 mg/l<br />

BAP – 0.5 mg/l<br />

IAA – 0.1 mg/l<br />

BAP – 0.5 mg/l<br />

IAA – 0.5 mg/l<br />

B-9 МS-100% BAP – 0.5 mg/l


THE BIOLOGY OF THE PROPAGATION OF SPECIES SCHISANDRA CHINENSIS (TURCZ.) BAILL.<br />

Tab. 2. The initiation and in vitro reaction of various types of explants in Schisandra chinensis<br />

Lateral<br />

Explant<br />

meristems<br />

Apical<br />

of the 2<br />

meristem<br />

Medium<br />

nd ,<br />

3 rd , and 4 th<br />

Lateral<br />

meristems<br />

of the 5<br />

degree<br />

th<br />

and 6 th<br />

Shoot<br />

Ovary Stem<br />

Shoot<br />

Fragments<br />

Fragments<br />

fragments<br />

with a fragment<br />

fragments<br />

of young<br />

of juvenile<br />

with<br />

Ovules fragment with the<br />

from the<br />

leaves with<br />

leaves<br />

lateral<br />

from the apical<br />

apical part<br />

veins<br />

degree<br />

meristem<br />

stem meristem<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11<br />

B-1 + ~ ~ ~<br />

B-2 + ~ ~ ~ + + + ~<br />

B-3 + ~ ~ ~ - + ~<br />

B-4 - - - + +<br />

B-5 + ~ ~ + + ~ +<br />

B-6 +<br />

B-7 + ~ + + ~ ~<br />

B-8 + ~ ~ + + ~ + + +<br />

B-9 + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~<br />

+ progress; - necroses; ~ without changes<br />

26


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 27-32<br />

MARDARI CONSTANTIN, TĂNASE CĂTĂLIN, DRAGHIA LUCIA, BÎRSAN CIPRIAN<br />

SOME ASPECTS REGARDING THE CULTIVATION OF SPECIES<br />

WITH DECORATIVE VALUE ACONITUM DEGENII Gáyer<br />

MARDARI CONSTANTIN 1 , TĂNASE CĂTĂLIN 2 , DRAGHIA LUCIA 3 ,<br />

BÎRSAN CIPRIAN 1<br />

Abstract: Ex situ conservation is the most important way through a Botanic Garden contributes to biodiversity<br />

conservation. One of the multiple directions of ex situ conservation is the diversification of the<br />

collections with spontaneous cormophytes presenting decorative value. Aconitum degenii Gáyer is<br />

an herbaceous, perennial and toxic species with the areal in Alps and Carpathian Mountains,<br />

sporadically met at forest’s margins. This species has been studied in 2009-2011 period in order to<br />

observe its behavior in the environmental conditions characteristic to the Botanic Garden of <strong>Iasi</strong>. To<br />

accomplish this aim seeds, rhizomes and individuals have been collected from the wild and<br />

introduced in experimental fields. Comparisons between flowering periods, qualitative (color of the<br />

flowers) and quantitative (number of the flowers, leaves and ramifications, plants height, rhizomes<br />

length) decorative characters of both cultivated and spontaneous individuals have been realized. It<br />

was observed that Aconitum degenii Gáyer individuals are keeping (almost the same quantitative<br />

characteristics) and even improve (longer flowering period) their decorative characteristics without<br />

being deteriorated or diminished. From the morpho – anatomical perspective none significant<br />

differences have been observed.<br />

Key words: decorative species, conventional cultivation<br />

Introduction<br />

The Aconitum genus includes approximately 300 species distributed mainly in the<br />

Northern Hemisphere [LUO & al. 2005]. In Romania, there were identified 10 species with<br />

5 atypical subspecies [CIOCÂRLAN, 2000] and it seems that the richest areas in Aconitum<br />

species are represented by the Northern half of the Oriental Carpathians and the Eastern<br />

part of the Southern Carpathians; in the Apuseni Mountains, Aconitum species appears less<br />

frequently [MIHOK & al. 2005]. These are herbaceous perennial plants, mainly cultivated<br />

for their tubers, used in medicinal and pharmaceutical purposes. Various active constituents<br />

produced from the roots of various species of Aconitum are used to cure a wide range if<br />

diseases [NIDHI & al. 2010]. Some species are also cultivated in ornamental purposes.<br />

Aconitum degenii Gáyer (syn. Aconitum paniculatum Lam. nom. illeg.) is a species<br />

presenting a cylindrical, branched rhizome and tall stems (60-150 cm). The leaves are<br />

alternately arranged, palmate divided and the flowers are blue-purple colored, with long<br />

pedicels and arranged in wide, thinned and richly branched inflorescences. It grows at the<br />

mountain forests edges. It is an herbaceous, perennial species (hemicryptophyte), with areal<br />

in Alps and Carpathians Mountains. It prefers full light, cool mountain areas, relative<br />

humid, neutral and rich in nitrogen soils (L6T2C4U6R7N7) [ELLENBERG, 1992]. It can be<br />

found in 6430 – Hydrophilous tall-herb fringe communities of plains and of the montane to<br />

1 “Anastasie Fătu” Botanic Garden, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iaşi, Dumbrava Roşie, no. 7-9, Iaşi –<br />

Romania, e-mail: mardariconstantin@yahoo.com<br />

2 “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University, Carol I, no. 20A, 700505, Iaşi – Romania<br />

3 “Ion Ionescu de la Brad” University, M. Sadoveanu, no. 3, 700490, Iaşi – Romania<br />

27


SOME ASPECTS REGARDING THE CULTIVATION OF SPECIES WITH DECORATIVE VALUE …<br />

alpine levels habitat type [GAFTA & MOUNTFORD, 2008], growing on fertile soils<br />

(Betulo – Adenostyletea) [CHIFU & al. 2006]. It is a diplo-polyploid species, spread<br />

sporadically in Romania (beech – fir vegetation levels) [CIOCÂRLAN, 2000].<br />

The species is known and used for medicinal purposes since antiquity. It is a toxic<br />

species that can be grown either alone or in groups in parks and gardens, being decorative<br />

by flowers.<br />

Material and methods<br />

In order to set up the experimental fields and to favor the growth, flowering and<br />

fructification of Aconitum degenii individuals, a flat, sunny and protected from strong<br />

currents of air land located between the greenhouses of the <strong>Botanica</strong>l Garden of <strong>Iasi</strong> has<br />

been chosen. Soil preparation was done in the preceding autumn of planting and consisted<br />

of weed removal and destruction of their roots [CIREAŞĂ, 1993]. Before planting, in the<br />

spring, the land was worked with a cultivator. Fertilizers were not applied in advance.<br />

Multiplication has been realized by seeds (Fig. 1) presenting good germination,<br />

about 80%, of which seedlings are produced (autumn sowing in pots, in November, because<br />

seeds lose germination capacity) and rhizomes (vegetative). Seedlings were obtained in<br />

pots using a mixture of earth, organic natural fertilizer, neutral peat and sand (1 : 2 : 1 : 1).<br />

The planting was done in spring, at the end of April. The plants were subjected to the<br />

process of mud and planted at 70 cm between rows and 50 cm distance from each other.<br />

The vegetative propagation by rhizomes has been tried. To do this, only the young and<br />

healthy rhizomes were used. Rhizomes were planted with the buds facing up, at the same<br />

distance intervals as the seedlings. The seeds collection has been realized after the fruit<br />

maturation (the second half of September). The harvesting of rhizomes has been made both<br />

during flowering period (June-August) and after the flowering period (September). Only<br />

young rhizomes have been collected. Waterings were applied each day (the first month<br />

after planting) to maintain soil moisture continuously. Weeds removal had a very important<br />

role because weeds absorbed the moisture and food of Aconitum plants and, in the early<br />

stages of development overshadowed the seedlings, with negative effects on their<br />

development. In culture conditions, Aconitum degenii plants grow well, vigorous, but do<br />

not tolerate the presence of weeds.<br />

Results and discussions<br />

Natural populations from Eastern Carpathians (Stânişoarei, Ceahlău, Bistriţei,<br />

Călimani and Nemira Mountains) of Aconitum degenii have been studied in areas with<br />

altitudes varying between 750 and 900m, characterized by a relative cold climate (2-4 ºC<br />

yearly average), abundant precipitations (750-1000 mm/m 2 /year), increased relative<br />

humidity of atmosphere (≈ 80-85%) and neutral-weak acid soils (pH 6-7). From the natural<br />

habitats (Vaccinio – Piceetea forests edges) seeds and individuals have been collected in<br />

order to cultivate them in the Botanic Garden from <strong>Iasi</strong> (characterized by a temperate<br />

continental climate with annual precipitations average of approximate 518 mm, annual<br />

temperatures average by 9,6 °C, relative humidity of the atmosphere ≈ 70% and neutral<br />

soils – pH ≈ 7).<br />

The seeds have initiated the germination process after 3 weeks. The cultivated plants<br />

produced flowers and viable seed in the first year of growth. Cultivated plants, grown from<br />

seeds and tubers in Botanic Garden from <strong>Iasi</strong>, generally produced one to two daughter tubers<br />

28


MARDARI CONSTANTIN, TĂNASE CĂTĂLIN, DRAGHIA LUCIA, BÎRSAN CIPRIAN<br />

by the end of the growing season. The transplanted seedlings collected from the wild and<br />

grown at low altitude presented a decrease of the plants characteristics (Fig. 3).<br />

a<br />

Fig. 1. a) Seeds of Aconitum degenii – germination capacity determination<br />

b) seed – detail<br />

In culture conditions the Aconitum degenii individuals present cylindrical,<br />

branched rhizomes, with an average length of 8.21 cm, less with approximate 2 cm on<br />

average comparing with the specimens studied in natural habitats. Individuals average<br />

height is 77.28 cm, lower than the height of the individuals from spontaneous flora (average<br />

86.46 cm).<br />

The leaves of Aconitum degenii are palmate divided (Fig. 2b), are alternately<br />

arranged and are less in the cultivated plants comparing to the specimens studied in natural<br />

habitats (an average of 19.83 leaves on a stem compared to 27.9) which is correlated with<br />

height decrease under culture conditions (Tab. 1).<br />

The flowers are numerous and are arranged in branched rich inflorescences<br />

(average 12.32 branches / plant). The flowers (Fig. 2a) are light blue - purple (size, color<br />

and intensity are kept) and presents long pedicels. Regarding the flowering period it was<br />

observed that the most of the cultivated individuals bloom at the same time as in natural<br />

habitats (July - September).<br />

a b<br />

Fig. 2. The main ornamental characteristics of Aconitum degenii Gáyer<br />

a – flowers<br />

b – leaf<br />

29<br />

b


SOME ASPECTS REGARDING THE CULTIVATION OF SPECIES WITH DECORATIVE VALUE …<br />

Tab. 1. Comparison of the morphometric characteristics of Aconitum degenii in natural habitats and culture conditions<br />

MORPHOMETRIC<br />

CHARACTERS<br />

(2009-2011)<br />

Plant height: 77,28<br />

cm.<br />

Rhizomes length:<br />

8,21 cm.<br />

Leaves number/plant:<br />

19,83.<br />

Ramifications<br />

number: 12,32.<br />

Flowers<br />

number/plant: 35,55.<br />

TRANSPLANTATION<br />

PLACE / ECOLOGIC<br />

CONDITIONS<br />

Iaşi <strong>Botanica</strong>l Garden<br />

Altitude: 150 m.<br />

pH soil: ≈ 7.<br />

Annual precipitations<br />

average: 518 mm.<br />

Annual temperatures<br />

average: 9,6 °C.<br />

Relative humidity of the<br />

atmosphere: ≈ 70%.<br />

NATURAL<br />

HABITATS<br />

AVERAGE<br />

Plant height: 86,46<br />

cm.<br />

Rhizomes length:<br />

10,12 cm.<br />

Leaves number/plant:<br />

27,9.<br />

Ramifications<br />

number: 12,375.<br />

Flowers<br />

number/plant: 30,25.<br />

MORPHOMETRIC<br />

CHARACTERS<br />

COENOTIC<br />

AMBIANCE<br />

POPULATION ECOLOGIC<br />

CONDITIONS<br />

Plant height: 90,1 cm.<br />

Rhizomes length: ≈ 10,3 cm.<br />

Ramifications number: 10,6.<br />

Leaves number/plant: 26,4.<br />

Flowers number/plant: 38,6.<br />

Leucanthemo<br />

waldsteinii-Piceetum:<br />

Leucanthemum<br />

waldsteinii, Picea abies,<br />

Hypericum maculatum,<br />

Digitalis grandiflora,<br />

Veronica urticifolia etc.<br />

Altitude: 750 m.<br />

pH soil: ≈ 6,5.<br />

Annual precipitations<br />

average: 800 mm.<br />

Annual temperatures<br />

average: 4 °C.<br />

Relative humidity of the<br />

atmosphere: ≈ 85%.<br />

Altitude: 810 m.<br />

pH soil: ≈ 7.<br />

Annual precipitations<br />

average: 900 mm.<br />

Annual temperatures<br />

average: 4 °C.<br />

Relative humidity of the<br />

atmosphere: ≈ 85%.<br />

Altitude: 900 m.<br />

pH soil: ≈ 6.<br />

Annual precipitations<br />

average: 1000 mm.<br />

Annual temperatures<br />

average: 2 °C.<br />

Relative humidity of the<br />

atmosphere: ≈ 80%.<br />

Altitude: 780 m.<br />

pH soil: ≈ 7.<br />

Annual precipitations<br />

average: 750 mm.<br />

Annual temperatures<br />

average: 4 °C.<br />

Relative humidity of the<br />

atmosphere: ≈ 85%.<br />

Stânişoarei<br />

Mountains<br />

Plant height: 84,94 cm.<br />

Rhizomes length: 9,6 cm.<br />

Leaves number/plant: 26,48.<br />

Ramifications number: 14,1.<br />

Flowers number/plant: 31,2.<br />

Hieracio transsilvanici-<br />

Piceetum: Picea abies,<br />

Luzula luzuloides,<br />

Brachypodium<br />

sylvaticum, Sanicula<br />

europaea, Epipactis<br />

helleborine etc.<br />

Bistriţei<br />

Mountains<br />

Plant height: 90,50 cm.<br />

Rhizomes length: 11,22 cm.<br />

Leaves number/plant: 30,2.<br />

Ramifications number: 10,8.<br />

Flowers number/plant: 24,4.<br />

Hieracio transsilvanici-<br />

Piceetum: Picea abies,<br />

Oxalis acetosella, Lilium<br />

martagon, Streptopus<br />

amplexifolius,<br />

Dryopteris filix-mas etc.<br />

Călimani<br />

Mountains<br />

Plant height: 80,3 cm.<br />

Rhizomes length: 9,36 cm.<br />

Leaves number/plant: 28,54.<br />

Ramifications number: 14.<br />

Flowers number/plant: 26,8.<br />

Hieracio transsilvanici-<br />

Abietetum: Abies alba,<br />

Picea abies, Lonicera<br />

xylosteum, Viola<br />

reicenbachiana,<br />

Geranium robertianum<br />

etc.<br />

Nemira<br />

Mountains<br />

30


100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

MARDARI CONSTANTIN, TĂNASE CĂTĂLIN, DRAGHIA LUCIA, BÎRSAN CIPRIAN<br />

Plants height (cm) Rhizomes length<br />

(cm)<br />

Stems<br />

ramifications<br />

In the ecological conditions of the Botanic Garden of <strong>Iasi</strong> the plants have developed<br />

well both in partially shaded areas and full sunned areas as long as the soil was kept moist. The<br />

vegetation period of the Aconitum degenii individuals is about 160 days per year. The growth<br />

and the development of the plants in the first year of culture is slower but in the next years (the<br />

second and third) is more intense.<br />

This species does not raise special issues of growth in the ecological conditions from<br />

Iaşi. It can be easy replicated by seedlings (from seeds) and rhizomes. Also, there have been not<br />

recorded any diseases or other pests during those three years of cultivation.<br />

The Aconitum degenii inflorescences can be used as cut flowers (with caution because<br />

the species is toxic) or they can add a blue color to a shaded garden. These plants grow well in<br />

damp, rich soils and the beautiful blue or blooms is very attractive from the early to late<br />

summer in the garden. To determine the plant to form another round of flowers in the late<br />

summer or early autumn, the first inflorescences must be cut in order to not allow the plant to<br />

make seeds. Also, the flowers of Aconitum degenii resist a relative long time as cut flowers<br />

(about 10 days) during which the flowers continue to open.<br />

The species could be planted under trees, in near wild gardens, among shrubs and in<br />

borders. It can fill vacant spaces in the garden when the earlier flowering plants have past. The<br />

Aconitum degenii individuals should be planted in masses (spots with numerous individuals).<br />

All species of Aconitum are very toxic (they contain aconitine, other alkaloids etc.), and,<br />

31<br />

Leaves<br />

number/plant<br />

Flow ers<br />

number/plant<br />

Natural habitats<br />

Culture conditions<br />

Fig. 3. Comparison between of some morphometric characters of Aconitum degenii<br />

individuals in natural habitats and under culture conditions


SOME ASPECTS REGARDING THE CULTIVATION OF SPECIES WITH DECORATIVE VALUE …<br />

consequently, they should never be planted in or too close to the vegetable gardens or the<br />

playing places of the children.<br />

Conclusions<br />

In the studied species (Aconitum degenii) the main decorative element is the flower.<br />

Secondly, the plant height, the number of stem’s branches, the size, the shape and the<br />

arrangement of leaves and number of flowers (or inflorescences) are other characters that<br />

justifies the introduction of this species in culture.<br />

Comparisons between the flowering periods, between a series of qualitative characters<br />

(such as flower color) and quantitative (number of flowers, leaves and stems branches, plant<br />

height, length of rhizomes) both in individuals obtained in culture or from the natural habitats<br />

showed that, under culture conditions, plants remains (approximately the same quantitative<br />

characters) and even improve (a longer period of flowering) decorative characters without to be<br />

deteriorated or diminished.<br />

We consider that Aconitum degenii is well suited to the purpose of introducing in the<br />

culture because it proves to be adapted quite well (even acclimatized, because they produced<br />

flowers and fruits) in the environmental conditions from the <strong>Botanica</strong>l Garden of Iaşi.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

The paper has been realized with the financial support provided by the Romanain<br />

Ministry of Education and Research via PNCDI project 52174/2008 “The refinement of the<br />

biodiversity of spontaneous flora from Romania in order to enrich the range of ornamental<br />

plants” – BIODIVDECOR.<br />

References<br />

1. CHIFU T., MÂNZU C. & ZAMFIRESCU O. 2006. Flora & Vegetaţia Moldovei (România). Iaşi: Edit.<br />

Universităţii „Alexandru Ioan Cuza”, 2, 698 pp.<br />

2. CIOCÂRLAN V. 2000. Flora ilustrată a României. Bucureşti: Edit. Ceres, 1138 pp.<br />

3. CIREAŞĂ E. 1993. Floricultură specială. Universitatea Agronomică „Ion Ionescu de la Brad” Iaşi, 355 pp.<br />

4. ELLENBERG H. 1992. Indicator values of vascular plants in Central Europe. Scripta Geobotanica. 18: 78.<br />

5. GAFTA D. & MOUNTFORD O. (eds.). 2008. Manual de interpretare a habitatelor Natura 2000 din România.<br />

Cluj-Napoca: Edit. Risoprint, 101 pp.<br />

6. LUO Y., ZHANG F. & YANG Q. 2005. Phylogeny of Aconitum subgenus Aconitum (Ranunculaceae) inferred<br />

from ITS sequences. Plant Syst. Evol., 252: 11-25.<br />

7. MIHOK C., ANTAL D. S. & CSEDÖ C. 2005. The repartition of Aconitum species throughout the Romanian<br />

Carpathians. Gyepgazdálkodási Közlemények, 3: 26-28.<br />

8. NIDHI S., VIKAS S., BARKHA K., DOBRIYAL A. K. & VIKASH S. J. 2010. Advancement in Research on<br />

Aconitum sp. (Ranunculaceae) under Different Area: A Review. Biotechnology, 9: 411-427.<br />

32


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 33-40<br />

LACZI ENIKŐ, APAHIDEAN ALEXANDRU SILVIU<br />

RESEARCH REGARDING THE INTRODUCTION OF A LEAST<br />

KNOWN VEGETABLE SPECIES IN CULTURE,<br />

IN TRANSYLVANIAN TABLELAND AREA;<br />

THE POSSIBILITY OF CULTIVATING CHINESE CABBAGE IN<br />

EARLY SPRING IN OPEN FIELD<br />

LACZI ENIKŐ 1 , APAHIDEAN ALEXANDRU SILVIU 1<br />

Abstract: The research concerning the possibility of cultivating Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris var.<br />

pekinensis) took place in the spring of 2011, in the experimental field which belongs to the<br />

Vegetable Growing Department from the University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary<br />

Medicine from Cluj-Napoca. A collection of varieties and hybrids belonging to this species was<br />

established, within which a variety (Granat) and four hybrids (Michihli, Kingdom 80, Nepa F1 and<br />

Vitimo F1) were used.<br />

During the vegetation period measurements were made regarding the growing and the development<br />

of these plants in Transylvanian Tableland specific conditions. The processing of data recorded at<br />

harvest shows that the obtained yield varied between 41.00 and 63.15 t/ha, the Vitimo F1 hybrid<br />

reaching the highest yield.<br />

The obtained yields are satisfying, considering that the culture was an ecological one, no chemical<br />

products such as fertilisers or substances for prevention and control of pests and diseases were used.<br />

Keywords: Chinese cabbage, organic culture, Chinese cabbage varieties<br />

Introduction<br />

Chinese cabbage, Brassica campestris var. pekinensis (syn. Brassica rapa var.<br />

pekinensis) is a less known vegetable in our country and it is cultivated mostly by amateur<br />

gardeners. Unfortunately, in this moment, it isn’t defined a well-established culture<br />

technology in our specialty literature.<br />

The development of this species in China was parallel with the European cabbages in<br />

Europe. Both belong to the same genus, Brassica, both evolved by cultivation from wild<br />

ancestors, both have been important foods since the remote past, and both now exist in<br />

numerous varieties which can be bought almost all year round [DAVIDSON & TOM, 2006].<br />

Chinese cabbage has a short vegetation period, and it belongs to that group of<br />

plants which are the fastest growing of all leafy vegetables, in good conditions heads can be<br />

cut ten weeks after sowing; loose-headed types two to three weeks sooner, while seedlings<br />

four to five weeks after sowing.<br />

The headed types of Chinese cabbage form a barrel-shaped, rounded or tall<br />

cylindrical head of closely folded leaves, usually creamy to light green in color, with a<br />

crinkled texture, prominent white veining and white midribs broadening out at the base<br />

[LARCOM, 2003].<br />

1 University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Horticulture, 3-5 Mănăştur Street,<br />

400372, Cluj-Napoca – România, e-mail: eniko.laczi@yahoo.com<br />

33


RESEARCH REGARDING THE INTRODUCTION OF A LEAST KNOWN VEGETABLE SPECIES …<br />

Material and method<br />

The research took place in the experimental field belonging to the Vegetable<br />

Growing Department of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-<br />

Napoca, in the spring of 2011.<br />

The main purpose of this experiment was the establishment of a culture technology,<br />

which allows the cultivation of this new species in the Transylvanian Tableland specific<br />

conditions. There were tested five varieties of Chinese cabbage in early spring ecological<br />

cultures.<br />

To achieve the objectives of this experiment a collection of varieties was<br />

organized, which involved the following varieties:<br />

• Michihli<br />

• Kingdom 80<br />

• Granat<br />

• Nepa F1<br />

• Vitimo F1<br />

Each variety was placed into three repetitions.<br />

The seeding started in 25 th February, the seeds being sown, one by one, in small<br />

nutrient pots and were transplanted in bigger pots in stage of 3-4 true leaves, in 26 th of<br />

March. Planting was realized in 4 th of April, in the experimental field.<br />

During the vegetation period there weren’t made any treatments or fertilizations.<br />

Harvest was realized in 1 st of June at Granat variety and Nepa F1 and Michihli hybrids, and<br />

in 10 th of June at Kingdom 80 and Vitimo F1 hybrids.<br />

During growing season observations were made regarding plants growth and<br />

development (these were made at planting, at one month after planting and at harvesting),<br />

and on obtained production to.<br />

Results and discussions<br />

Plants height evolution from planting to harvest. At planting, the highest<br />

seedlings (15.33 cm) were those from Granat variety, while at harvest those from Nepa<br />

hybrid, with an average height of 52.50 cm.<br />

It can be observed that at four of the five variants the plants height is increasing<br />

constantly, but at the last one, represented by Vitimo hybrid, plants average height is<br />

decreasing in the last few weeks of the vegetation period, from 31.37 cm to 29.33. This fact<br />

can be explained by the head formation, where every leaf has a very important role.<br />

At the remaining variants the height increasing, from planting to a month after<br />

planting, varied between 7.83 cm (at Kingdom 80 hybrid) and 26.83 cm (at Michihli<br />

hybrid), while until harvest the average height has grown with 3.17 cm (at Kingdom 80<br />

hybrid) and 16.17 cm (at Nepa F1 hybrid) (Fig. 1).<br />

Plants diameter evolution from planting to harvest. The seedlings diameter<br />

varied between 13.33 cm (at Vitimo hybrid) and 19.00 cm (at Kingdom 80 hybrid), while at<br />

harvest the measured diameters had values between 47.33 cm (at Vitimo hybrid) and 66.50<br />

cm (at Nepa hybrid).<br />

Unlike the plants height, their diameter was increasing constantly at all variants<br />

from planting to harvest. So, in one month from planting the plants diameter increasing<br />

34


LACZI ENIKŐ, APAHIDEAN ALEXANDRU SILVIU<br />

varied between 24.67 cm (at hybrid Michihli) and 33.33 cm (at Kingdom 80 hybrid), while<br />

until harvest the increasing had much lower values, varying between 1.17 cm (at Kingdom<br />

80 hybrid) and 17.83 cm (at Nepa hybrid) (Fig. 2).<br />

Leaf number evolution from planting to harvest. In Fig. 3 it can be observed<br />

that the highest number of leaves was registered at Kingdom 80 hybrid, not only in seedling<br />

stage (when it had an average of 7.67 leaves), but at the measurements made at one month<br />

after planting (with 19.83 leaves) and at harvest to (when plants were formed in average<br />

from 35.67 leaves). This hybrid was closely followed by Vitimo F1, which had an average<br />

of 34.67 leaves.<br />

The lowest increasing of leaves number from planting to harvest was registered at<br />

Michihli hybrid, which formed only 14.50 leaves in the vegetation period.<br />

Correlation between total number of leaves and total weight. The correlation<br />

coefficient between total number of leaves and total weight had a value of 0.73, which is<br />

lower than the value of p (5%)=0,88, for the five cases studied, so between these characters<br />

there is no statistically supported correlation (Fig. 4).<br />

Cabbage head development at maturity. Data from Table 1 shows that the<br />

longest heads (with an average length of 46.83 cm) and largest diameter (with an average<br />

diameter of 41.00 cm) were registered at Michihli hybrid. The highest weight of plants<br />

(0.73 kg) was noticed at Vitimo hybrid, while the plants belonging to Kingdom 80 hybrid<br />

had the highest number of leaves.<br />

Comparison between total plant and head weight. Total head weight varied<br />

between 0.56 and 0.88 kg, while the head weight between 0.47 and 0.73 kg. The lowest<br />

difference between the two characters was registered at Michihli hybrid (a difference of<br />

only 80 g), and the highest one at hybrid Vitimo, where the heads were easiest with 150 g<br />

than the plants (Fig. 5).<br />

Correlation between total and head weight. Fig. 6 presents the correlation<br />

between total and head weight, the coefficient of correlation between this two characters,<br />

being 0.97, which is higher than the theoretically value for p (1%) = 0.96, for the five<br />

studied cases, so between total and head weight exists a distinct significant positive<br />

correlation.<br />

Leaf layout. The leaf layout is a very important characteristic of Chinese cabbage,<br />

because the leaves from rosette are in most cases removed, and only the cabbage head is<br />

used. The rosettes were formed, in average, from 5.67 leaves (at Michihli hybrid) and 8.17<br />

leaves (at Kingdom 80 hybrid), while the number of leaves from the heads varied between<br />

14.83 leaves, at Granat variety and 27.50 leaves at Kingdom 80 hybrid, followed closely by<br />

Vitimo hybrid, with 27.17 leaves (Fig. 7).<br />

Results regarding the bolting percentage. The measurements made at one month<br />

after planting shows that at Michihli hybrid, the bolting percentage was 8.33%, at Granat<br />

and Nepa was 12.5%, while at the last two hybrids (Kingdom 80 and Vitimo) no plants had<br />

been bolted until this moment, the average bolting percentage being 6.67%.<br />

Until harvest, the average bolting percentage increased, reaching the value of<br />

18.33%, the lowest bolting percentage (8.33%) was registered at Vitimo hybrid, while the<br />

highest (29.17%) at Granat variety (Fig. 8).<br />

The influence of variety upon the yield of Chinese cabbage. The data from<br />

Table 2 shows that the yields varied between 41.00 and 63.15 t/ha. The lowest yield was<br />

registered when Granat variety was used, while the highest one was observed when Vitimo<br />

hybrid was cultivated. If Granat variety was took as control variant, a distinct significant<br />

35


RESEARCH REGARDING THE INTRODUCTION OF A LEAST KNOWN VEGETABLE SPECIES …<br />

difference was observed at Kingdom 80 hybrid, which has a yield of 49.07 t/ha, with<br />

14.80% more than at Granat variety. In addition to this difference two more very significant<br />

differences were observed at Nepa and Vitimo hybrids, where the yields were higher than at<br />

the witness variant with 28.48% and 54.02%, their yields being 52.67 and 63.15 t/ha.<br />

If the average yield of the five varieties was considered the control variant, there<br />

was registered a distinct significant difference at Granat variety, where the yield was lower<br />

with 8.66 t/ha than the average one. Beside this, a significant negative difference was<br />

registered at Michihli hybrid (with a lower yield of 7.26 t/ha), and a very significant<br />

positive one, at Vitimo hybrid, which had an increased yield with 13.49 t/ha compared with<br />

the control variant.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The highest plants with largest diameter, at harvest, were those from Nepa hybrid,<br />

which had an average height of 52.50 cm and an average diameter of 66.50 cm.<br />

The plants belonging to Kingdom 80 hybrid, had the highest number of leaves,<br />

35.67, which were followed closely by the plants from Vitimo hybrid, with 34.67 leaves.<br />

Even if between total leaf number and total weight there was no statistically<br />

supported relationship, between head and total weight exists a distinct significant positive<br />

correlation.<br />

The bolting percentage had an average value of 18.33%, at harvest, with a<br />

minimum number of bolted plants at Vitimo hybrid.<br />

The yields varied between 41.00 t/ha (at Granat hybrid) and 63.15 t/ha (at<br />

Vitimo hybrid).<br />

The most suitable hybrid, for cultivation in Transylvanian Tableland area is<br />

Vitimo F1 (due to its high production and low bolting percentage), followed by Nepa F1<br />

(due to its high yield and good plant development).<br />

In conclusion it can be said that Chinese cabbage can be cultivated in<br />

Transylvanian Tableland area, even in early spring ecological cultures, in open field,<br />

without using special measures, adding fertilizers or making treatments with synthetic<br />

products.<br />

References<br />

1. DAVIDSON A. & TOM J. 2006. The Oxford Companion to Food. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 175 pp.<br />

2. LARCOM J. 2003. The Organic Salad Garden. Frances Lincoln Limited, London, 31-33 pp.<br />

36


No.<br />

Variant<br />

Variety /<br />

Hybrid<br />

LACZI ENIKŐ, APAHIDEAN ALEXANDRU SILVIU<br />

Tab. 1. Cabbage head development at maturity<br />

Cabbage head<br />

Lenght<br />

(cm)<br />

Diameter<br />

37<br />

(cm)<br />

Weight<br />

(kg)<br />

Number of<br />

leaves<br />

1 Michihli 46,83 41,00 0,48 16,17<br />

2 Kingdom 80 35,00 34,50 0,59 27,50<br />

3 Granat 44,33 27,50 0,47 14,83<br />

4 Nepa F1 42,00 38,67 0,66 19,83<br />

5 Vitimo F1 28,67 37,17 0,73 27,17<br />

Variant<br />

Hybrid<br />

Average 39,37 35,77 0,59 21,10<br />

Tab. 2. The influence of variety upon the yield of Chinese cabbage<br />

Average<br />

yield<br />

(t/ha)<br />

Relative<br />

yield<br />

(%)<br />

Difference<br />

(t/ha)<br />

Significance<br />

Relative<br />

yield<br />

(%)<br />

Difference<br />

(t/ha)<br />

Significance<br />

Granat 41.00 100,0 0,00 Mt. 82.56 -8.66 oo<br />

Kingdom<br />

80<br />

49,07 114.80 8.07 ** 94.78 -0.59 -<br />

Michihli 42.40 103.41 1.40 - 85.38 -7.26 o<br />

Nepa F1 52,67 128.48 11.67 *** 106.06 3.01 -<br />

Vitimo F1 63.15 154.02 22.15 *** 127.16 13.49 ***<br />

Average 49.66 - - - 100,0 0,00 Mt.<br />

LSD (p 5%) 6,09<br />

LSD (p 1%) 8.05<br />

LSD (p 0,1%) 11.25


RESEARCH REGARDING THE INTRODUCTION OF A LEAST KNOWN VEGETABLE SPECIES …<br />

60,00<br />

50,00<br />

40,00<br />

30,00<br />

Plants height (cm)<br />

20,00<br />

10,00<br />

0,00<br />

FIGURE CAPTIONS<br />

At planting 15,00 13,67 15,33 13,33 11,00<br />

One month after planting 41,83 21,50 38,67 36,33 31,17<br />

At harvest 46,50 24,67 47,83 52,50 29,33<br />

80,00<br />

60,00<br />

40,00<br />

Plants diameter (cm)<br />

20,00<br />

0,00<br />

Michihli Kingdom 80 Granat Nepa F1 Vitimo F1<br />

38<br />

Variant<br />

Fig. 1. Plants height evolution from planting to harvest<br />

Michihli Kingdom 80 Granat Nepa F1 Vitimo F1<br />

At planting 18,33 19,00 15,00 15,33 13,33<br />

One month after planting 43,00 51,67 43,50 48,67 42,83<br />

At harvest 55,83 52,83 55,17 66,50 47,33<br />

Variant<br />

Fig. 2. Plants diameter evolution from planting to harvest


40,00<br />

35,00<br />

30,00<br />

25,00<br />

20,00<br />

Number of leaves 15,00<br />

Total leaf number<br />

10,00<br />

5,00<br />

0,00<br />

LACZI ENIKŐ, APAHIDEAN ALEXANDRU SILVIU<br />

Michihli Kingdom 80 Granat Nepa F1 Vitimo F1<br />

At planting 7,33 7,67 6,33 6,67 7,00<br />

One mont after planting 16,83 19,83 15,67 14,00 16,50<br />

At harvest 21,83 35,67 21,67 25,83 34,67<br />

40,00<br />

30,00<br />

39<br />

Variant<br />

20,00<br />

10,00<br />

0,00<br />

y = 40,407x - 0,392<br />

r = 0,73<br />

0,50 0,55 0,60 0,65 0,70 0,75 0,80 0,85 0,90<br />

Weight (kg)<br />

1,00<br />

0,80<br />

0,60<br />

0,40<br />

0,20<br />

0,00<br />

Fig. 3. Leaf number evolution from planting to harvest<br />

Total weigth (kg)<br />

Total leaf number<br />

Fig. 4. Correlation between total number of leaves and total weight<br />

n=5, p(5%)=0.88, p(1%)=0.96<br />

Michihli Kingdom 80 Granat Nepa F1 Vitimo F1<br />

Total 0,56 0,70 0,62 0,75 0,88<br />

Head 0,48 0,59 0,47 0,66 0,73<br />

Variant<br />

Fig. 5. Comparison between total plant and head weight


RESEARCH REGARDING THE INTRODUCTION OF A LEAST KNOWN VEGETABLE SPECIES …<br />

Number of leaves<br />

Bolting percentage (%)<br />

Head weight (kg)<br />

40,00<br />

30,00<br />

20,00<br />

10,00<br />

0,00<br />

0,80<br />

0,70<br />

0,60<br />

0,50<br />

0,40<br />

0,30<br />

0,20<br />

0,10<br />

40<br />

y = 0,8909x - 0,0392<br />

r = 0,97<br />

0,00<br />

0,50 0,55 0,60 0,65 0,70 0,75 0,80 0,85 0,90<br />

Total weight (kg)<br />

Head weight<br />

Michihli Kingdom 80 Granat Nepa F1 Vitimo F1<br />

Rosette 5,67 8,17 6,83 6,00 7,50<br />

Head 16,17 27,50 14,83 19,83 27,17<br />

Total 21,83 35,67 21,67 25,83 34,67<br />

35,00<br />

30,00<br />

25,00<br />

20,00<br />

15,00<br />

10,00<br />

5,00<br />

0,00<br />

20,83<br />

8,33<br />

Fig. 6. Correlation between total and head weight<br />

n=5, p(5%)=0.88, p(1%)=0.96<br />

12,50<br />

0,00<br />

29,17<br />

12,50<br />

Variant<br />

Fig. 7. Leaf layout<br />

Michihli Kingdom 80 Granat Nepa F1 Vitimo F1 Average<br />

Variant<br />

20,83<br />

12,50<br />

One month after planting At harvest<br />

Fig. 8. Bolting percentage<br />

8,33<br />

0,00<br />

18,33<br />

6,67


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 41-45<br />

41<br />

ANDRO ANCA-RALUCA & al.<br />

COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

RESEARCH ON TAXA OF MENTHA L. GENUS<br />

ANDRO ANCA-RALUCA 1 , BOZ IRINA 1 , PĂDURARIU CLAUDIA 1 ,<br />

ATOFANI DOINA 1 , COISIN MAGDA 1 , ZAMFIRACHE MARIA-MAGDALENA 1<br />

Abstract: The Mentha L. genus has many aromatic and medicinal taxa with a large area in our country. These<br />

taxa prefer flooded, swampy areas and wetlands, but they can also grow in moderate dry areas.<br />

Biochemical characteristics were obtained for 7 taxa from Mentha L. genus, wild or cultivated<br />

plants. The studies concerning the assimilative pigments, the hydric content, and the dry matter were<br />

determined for each vegetation stage. We used the gravimetric method for the hydric content and dry<br />

matter and the spectrophotometric method for estimation of the assimilative pigments. The results of<br />

the experiments are not the same for each taxon because of different harvesting periods and the<br />

ecological conditions of each taxon area.<br />

Key words: Mentha, assimilative pigments, dry matter, water<br />

Introduction<br />

Mentha genus includes herbaceous plants, perennial, aromatic, with a pungent<br />

odor characteristic, due to the volatile oil they contain. The Genus Mentha L. has a complex<br />

taxonomy, which makes it difficult to identify the species because of its phenotypic<br />

plasticity, genetic variability and because most species are able to produce hybrids by<br />

crossing. For example, the delimitation of the species Mentha spicata L. is problematic due<br />

to hybridization and doubling the number of chromosomes, especially when introgressive<br />

hybridization appears between some species in certain areas [HARLEY, 1972].<br />

Due to their properties, these plants are used in pharmaceutical cosmetic and<br />

food industries. Photosynthetic pigments are known for their physiological role of<br />

protection against physical agents, such as blue and ultraviolet radiation, but also against<br />

biological agents [HOPKINS, 1985].<br />

Water provides an environment for vital biochemical reactions. In metabolic<br />

processes it makes the enzyme activity and is involved in both biosynthesis and anabolic<br />

processes to catabolic processes of degradation [TOMA & JITĂREANU, 2000].<br />

Materials and methods<br />

The material used in this paper is represented by seven taxa of the genus Mentha,<br />

cultivated or from spontaneous vegetation, collected in three phenophases: vegetative,<br />

flowering and senescence, during the vegetation period of 2010. The culticated taxa are:<br />

Mentha spicata L., Mentha piperita var. black Mitcham. and Mentha x piperita var.<br />

columna L. The spontaneous taxa were collected from the following locations: Caraorman,<br />

1 Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Biology, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University, 20A Carol I Boulevard,<br />

700505, Iaşi – Romania, tel. 40(0)232201072, e-mail: anca_andro@yahoo.com


COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ON TAXA OF MENTHA L…<br />

Tulcea County (Mentha aquatica L. and Mentha pulegium L.), Negreşti and Cioatele,<br />

Vaslui County (Mentha longifolia (L.) Huds.).<br />

For determination of foliar assimilatory pigments we used the spectrophotometric<br />

method and for determining the content water and dry matter the gravimetric method was<br />

used [BOLDOR & al. 1983].<br />

Research has been conducted in the Laboratory of Plant Physiology of the Faculty<br />

of Biology, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza”, Iaşi.<br />

Results and discussions<br />

The research conducted on the biosynthesis and accumulation of assimilatory<br />

pigments in the studied taxa, reveals the following results (Tab. 1):<br />

Tab. 1. Assimilatory pigment content in species of the genus Mentha during vegetative<br />

stage in 2010<br />

Taxon<br />

Vegetative<br />

stage<br />

Chlorophyll a<br />

(mg/g<br />

fresh matter)<br />

Chlorophyll b<br />

(mg/g<br />

fresh matter)<br />

Carotenoidic<br />

pigments<br />

(mg/g<br />

fresh matter)<br />

Chlorophyll a<br />

/ Chlorophyll<br />

b<br />

Mentha<br />

Vegetative 1.130 0.404 0.0003 2.797<br />

longifolia (L.)<br />

Huds.<br />

(Negreşti)<br />

Flowering<br />

Senescence<br />

1.353<br />

1.012<br />

0.451<br />

0.283<br />

0.0004<br />

0.0003<br />

3.000<br />

3.575<br />

Mentha<br />

Vegetative 0.961 0.311 0.0002 3.090<br />

longifolia (L.)<br />

Huds.<br />

(Cioatele)<br />

Flowering<br />

Senescence<br />

0.909<br />

1.252<br />

0.339<br />

0.360<br />

0.0002<br />

0.0003<br />

2.681<br />

3.477<br />

Mentha<br />

aquatica<br />

L.(Caraorman)<br />

Vegetative 0.455 0.198 0.0001 2.297<br />

Mentha<br />

pulegium L.<br />

(Caraorman)<br />

Mentha x<br />

piperita var.<br />

columna<br />

L.(Vaslui)<br />

Mentha<br />

piperita var.<br />

black<br />

Mitcham.<br />

(Piatra Neamţ)<br />

Mentha spicata<br />

L.<br />

(Piatra Neamţ)<br />

Flowering 0.495 0.178 0.0001 2.780<br />

Senescence 0.641 0.315 0.0002 2.034<br />

Vegetative 0.779 0.237 0.0001 3.286<br />

Flowering 0.905 0.365 0.0002 2.479<br />

Senescence 1.127 0.401 0.0003 2.810<br />

Vegetative 1.841 0.590 0.0005 3.120<br />

Flowering 1.532 0.450 0.0004 3.404<br />

Senescence 1.340 0.452 0.0004 2.964<br />

Vegetative 1.510 0.558 0.0004 2.706<br />

Flowering 2.081 0.739 0.0001 2.815<br />

Senescence 1.898 0.675 0.0002 2.811<br />

Vegetative 1.101 0.387 0.0003 2.844<br />

Flowering 2.294 0.755 0.0006 3.038<br />

Senescence 2.178 0.643 0.0003 3.387<br />

42


43<br />

ANDRO ANCA-RALUCA & al.<br />

On the taxa taken into study one may note an upward trend of assimilatory<br />

pigments in plant during the growing season. From the quantitative point of view there are<br />

significant differences throughout the growing season: the content of assimilatory pigments<br />

in cultivated taxa (M. x piperita var. columna, M. x piperita var. black, M. spicata is<br />

obviously higher than that of spontaneous taxa (M. longifolia, M. aquatica, M. pulegium).<br />

These taxa were collected in the same phenophase, so the process of photosynthesis is<br />

greater in the leaves of cultivated taxa, compared with those collected from spontaneous<br />

taxa.<br />

It was recorded a significant quantitative increase of chlorophyll a from the<br />

vegetative phenophase to senescence in the case of M. aquatica and M. pulegium taxa. At<br />

three of the taxa studied (M. longifolia, (Negreşti), M. x piperita var. black, M. spicata the<br />

maximum amount of chlorophyll a was recorded at flowering and at the other two (M.<br />

longifolia (Cioatele), M. x piperita var. columna the maximum amount of chlorophyll a<br />

was recorded in vegetative phenophase.<br />

In the case of chlorophyll b was found a similar dynamic, the values recorded<br />

being obvious lower. The variations recorded for chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b change<br />

the relationship between the two fractions of chlorophyll, the highest value being reached<br />

during the flowering period of the plant (3.404 mg/g fresh matter) at the M. x piperita var.<br />

columna taxon.<br />

In all three vegetative phenophases is observed that the ratio of chlorophyll a and<br />

chlorophyll b varies from 2.034 to 3.404; the lowest value was registered at senescence,<br />

while the lowest value was reached in the flowering phenophase. We see therefore that the<br />

ratio of 3/1 expressed in specialty literature for many species is not recorded constantly<br />

throughout the period analyzed [BURZO & al. 1999; TOMA & JITĂREANU, 2000;<br />

ZAMFIRACHE, 2005].<br />

Carotenoid pigments are found in small quantities, 0.0001 to 0.0006 mg/g fresh<br />

matter, compared with chlorophylls a and b. The maximum value, 0.0006 mg/g fresh matter<br />

for carotenoid pigments was recorded during the flowering period for M. spicata taxon.<br />

The intensity of photosynthesis varies throughout the year. With the increase in<br />

leaf size the number of chloroplasts and the amount of chlorophyll also increases, the<br />

photosynthesis process becoming more intense [BĂDULESCU, 2009]. If we analyze the<br />

foliar tissue indicators at the studied taxa, it appears that the process of photosynthesis<br />

records significant increases throughout the growing season in proportion to the chlorophyll<br />

content. The intensity of this process stays constant thereafter.<br />

Tab. 2. Dry foliar matter and water content at species of the genus Mentha L. during the<br />

growing season in 2010<br />

Taxon Vegetative stage S.U. (g%) H2O (g%)<br />

Mentha longifolia (L.) Huds. Vegetative 27.21 72.79<br />

(Negreşti)<br />

Flowering 28.36 71.64<br />

Senescence 32.81 67.19<br />

Mentha longifolia (L.) Huds. Vegetative 29.87 70.13<br />

(Cioatele)<br />

Flowering 28.02 71.98<br />

Senescence 39.11 60.89<br />

Mentha aquatica L.<br />

Vegetative 19.35 80.85<br />

(Caraorman)<br />

Flowering 27.12 72.88<br />

Senescence 27.75 72.25


COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ON TAXA OF MENTHA L…<br />

Mentha pulegium L.<br />

Vegetative 19.18 80.82<br />

(Caraorman)<br />

Flowering 22.59 77.41<br />

Senescence 28.20 71.80<br />

Mentha x piperita<br />

Vegetative 20.51 79.49<br />

var. columna L.<br />

Flowering 21.68 78.32<br />

(Vaslui) Senescence 23.28 76.72<br />

Mentha x piperita<br />

Vegetative 16.61 83.39<br />

var. black Mitcham.<br />

Flowering 30.11 69.89<br />

(Piatra Neamţ) Senescence 31.78 68.22<br />

Mentha spicata L.<br />

Vegetative 15.73 84.25<br />

(Piatra Neamţ)<br />

Flowering 29.35 70.65<br />

Senescence 35.60 64.40<br />

Water content: from research conducted at the studied taxa we noticed that in the<br />

vegetation period it was recorded the highest water content, which decreased gradually<br />

towards fructification (Tab. 2). The highest value was registered in the vegetative<br />

phenophase - 84.25 g% in M. spicata species, and the lowest value of 60.89 g% was<br />

obtained from the species M. longifolia collected from Cioatele area, Vaslui County; we<br />

consider this water content to be sufficient for the physiological processes in normal<br />

parameters at the plants investigated. The observed values for water content of taxa<br />

analyzed, range from 70.13 to 84.25 g% for vegetative phenophase 69.89 to 78.32 g% for<br />

flowering and from 60.89 to 76.72 g% senescence.<br />

Dry matter accumulates during the development of the plant, its highest value<br />

occurring in senescence 39.11 g% of the species M. longifolia collected from the area<br />

Cioatele. The values obtained in the vegetative phenophase range from 15.73 to 29.87 g%<br />

at flowering from 21.68 to 29.35 and from 23.28 to 39.11 g% at senescence.<br />

At the studied taxa a similar trend is observed concerning the water content and<br />

dry foliar matter throughout the whole vegetation season; as an exception we report the<br />

situation of M. longifolia taxon collected from the area Cioatele, which has the lowest<br />

content of dry foliar matter at flowering phenophase (28.02 g%).<br />

Therefore it is observed a quantitative increase in dry matter content throughout<br />

the vegetation period inversely proportional to the decrease of water content. This was also<br />

observed by other authors as ZAMFIRACHE & al. (1997, 2005), BURZO & al. (1999),<br />

STRATU (2002) etc., at many other species. All these results indicate that the investigated<br />

plants have a higher metabolic rhythm in the phenophase of vegetation, and afterwards it<br />

decreases gradually towards fruition.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The taxa taken into account, according to the foliar investigated indicators, show<br />

that the intensity of photosynthesis varies throughout the whole vegetation season, this<br />

process increasing proportionally with the quantity of assimilative pigments.<br />

The content of foliar water and dry matter of the analyzed taxa suggests that the<br />

physiological processes take place at an alert pace during phenophase and decrease<br />

progressively towards senescence.<br />

44


45<br />

ANDRO ANCA-RALUCA & al.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

This article was made possible with financial support within the<br />

POSDRU/88/1.5/S/47646 project, co-funded from the Social European Fund, via Human<br />

Resources Development Operational Programme 2007-2013 and by program “Developing<br />

the innovation capacity and improving the impact of research through post-doctoral<br />

programmes” POSDRU/89/1.5/S/4994.<br />

References<br />

1. BĂDULESCU L. 2009. Botanică şi fiziologia plantelor. Bucureşti: Edit. Elisa Varos: 127-149.<br />

2. BOLDOR O., RAIANU O. & TRIFU M. 1983. Fiziologia plantelor, (lucrări practice). Bucureşti: Edit.<br />

Didactică şi Pedagogică: 145-160.<br />

3. BURZO I., TOMA S., CRĂCIUN C., VOICAN V., DOBRESCU A. & DELIAN E. 1999. Fiziologia<br />

plantelor de cultură, Vol. 1. Chişinău: Edit. „Întreprinderea Editorial - Poligrafică Ştiinţa”, 48-78, 199-<br />

234, 378-429.<br />

4. HARLEY R. M. 1972. Mentha. În Flora Europaea, Vol. III, Edit. Cambridge University Press: 183 – 186.<br />

5. HOPKINS W. G. 1985. Introduction to plant physiology. John Wiley and sons. Inc; New York – Chichester –<br />

Brisbane – Toronto – Singapore.<br />

6. STRATU A. 2002. Cercetări fiziologice şi biochimice la specii din familia Umbeliferae (Apiaceae). Teză de<br />

doctorat. Universitatea “Al. I. Cuza” din Iaşi: 41-61, 190-289.<br />

7. TOMA L. D. & JITĂREANU C. D.,2000. Fiziologia plantelor. Iaşi: Edit. Ion Ionescu de la Brad: 15-44.<br />

8. ZAMFIRACHE M.-M., BOGHIU A. & AIFTIMIE A. 1997. Aspecte ale regimului hidric la specii de origine<br />

mediteraneană cultivate în scop ornamental în condiţii protejate, Lucr. Şt. Univ. St. Agr. Med. Vet. ”Ion<br />

Ionescu de la Brad” Iaşi, ser. Horticultură, 40: 326-328.<br />

9. ZAMFIRACHE M.-M. 2005. Fiziologie vegetală, 1, Iaşi: Edit. Azimuth: 72-89.


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 47-54<br />

47<br />

ADUMITRESEI LIDIA & al.<br />

OBSERVATIONS ON THE FOLIAR ASSIMILATING PIGMENTS<br />

CONTENT FOR WILD AND GARDEN ROSES<br />

ADUMITRESEI LIDIA 1 , ZAMFIRACHE MARIA MAGDALENA 2 ,<br />

OLTEANU ZENOVIA 2 , BOZ IRINA 2<br />

Abstract: The study of foliar assimilating pigments (chlorophyll a and b, carotenoid pigments) during the<br />

ontogenetic development for the wild and the cultivar species of roses indicate from interesting<br />

aspects on the ratio chlorophyll a and b, which is more than a unit in the case of species and in most<br />

cases, less than a unit for the cultivars. The ratio chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments, reaches<br />

thousands in the case of species and units (tenths) for cultivars.<br />

We mention here that the cultivars are the result of multiple and introgressive hybridizations<br />

conducted for hundreds of years [ADUMITRESEI & STĂNESCU, 2009; KRÜSMAN, 1986].<br />

Key words: wild and cultivated roses, chlorophyll, carotenoids from the leaf<br />

Introduction<br />

The Rosa genus represents, through the spontaneous species spread in the holarctic<br />

region, a botanical entity of wide scientific, fundamental and applied interest; despite all<br />

this, information about the fundamental research on its biology is still scarce [BURZO & al.<br />

2005; JITĂREANU, 2007; SIHNA, 2004; ZAMFIRACHE, 2005, 2006].<br />

As far as its behaviour towards sunlight is concerned, the speciality literature<br />

mentions that the species of the Rosa genus are mostly heliosciophyte having a transition<br />

character between the sun and the shade species [KRÜSSMAN, 1986].<br />

From a physiological point of view, for the representatives of the Rosa genus the<br />

more intensely studied under a functional aspect are the two distinct photo systems and less<br />

other characteristics of photo assimilating pigments [TAIZ, 2002].<br />

Material and methods<br />

The study of assimilating pigments content from 9 spontaneous species of the<br />

Rosa genus, 5 aboriginal ones (R. canina L., R. gallica L., R. glauca Pourr., R.<br />

pimpinellifolia L., R. rubiginosa L.) and 4 alochtonous ones (R. damascena Mill., R.<br />

multibracteata Hemsl. et Wills., R. multiflora Thunb. and R. rugosa Thunb.) was conducted<br />

during vegetation period, observing chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments content at<br />

vegetative status, blooming fructification and fruit ripening. In order to emphasize the same<br />

compounds 8 types of garden roses (‘Cocktail’, ‘Laminuette’, ‘Luchian’, ‘M-me A.<br />

Meilland’, ‘Perla d’Alcanada’, ‘Président Briand’, ‘Pristine’ and ‘Rose Gaujard’) were<br />

observed.<br />

1 “Anastasie Fătu” Botanic Garden, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iaşi, Dumbrava Roşie, no. 7-9, 700487,<br />

Iaşi – Romania, e-mail: lidia.adumitresei@yahoo.com<br />

2 “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iaşi, Bd. Carol I, no. 11, 700 506, Iaşi – Romania


OBSERVATIONS ON THE FOLIAR ASSIMILATING PIGMENTS CONTENT FOR WILD AND…<br />

The fresh material of foliar assimilating pigments determinations was done in the<br />

Vegetal Physiology Laboratory of the Biology Faculty, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University<br />

of Iaşi by spectrophotometric method.<br />

Results and discussions<br />

In the case of species, during the vegetative stage, there can be observed a higher<br />

chlorophyll a content compared to chlorophyll b, of a ratio ranging around the value of 3/1<br />

in all the cases.<br />

Slightly higher values of chlorophyll were registered for the species R. damascena<br />

(1.897 mg), R. glauca (1.576 mg) and R. pimpinellifolia (1.448 mg), with a minimum value<br />

for the R. multibracteata (1.016 mg) species (Fig. 1).<br />

High values of chlorophyll b are present in the species R. damascena (0.617 mg),<br />

followed by R. glauca (0.538 mg) and R. canina (0.516 mg), while the lowest quantities are<br />

to be found in R. rubiginosa (0.319 mg) and R. multibracteata (0.306 mg).<br />

The minimum values of the chlorophyll a : chlorophyll b ratio are observed in R.<br />

pimpinellifolia (2.998/1), R. glauca (2.929/1), while R. rubiginosa and R. multibracteata<br />

have ratios that are superior to the values 3.3/1.<br />

mg/100 g<br />

2<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

R. canina<br />

R. gallica<br />

R. glauca<br />

R. pimpinellifolia<br />

R. rubiginosa<br />

Fig. 1. The assimilating pigments content variation for the investigated species of Rosa,<br />

vegetative stage<br />

Carotenoid pigments have comparable values for all the taxons, varying between<br />

0.0004 mg (R. multibracteata and R. gallica) and 0.0006 mg (R. damascena).<br />

48<br />

R. damascena<br />

R. multibracteata<br />

R. multiflora<br />

R. rugosa<br />

Clorofila Chlorophyll a a Clorofila Chlorophyll b b Pigmenţi Carotenoid carotenoidici pigments


49<br />

ADUMITRESEI LIDIA & al.<br />

One must notice that the relatively high content of chrolophyll pigments in the R.<br />

glauca species, which are macroscopically shielded by antocianic pigments, giving it the<br />

colour naming the species.<br />

The carotenoid pigments content is extermely low in all the species, and the ratio<br />

of chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments varies between 3305/1 in the case of the<br />

R. multibracteata species and 4266 for the R. canina species.<br />

It is possible, that the usual role of protective screen of the carotenoid pigments<br />

may be taken over by the antocianic pigments present in large quantities in the leaves as<br />

well as in the young Rosa shoots<br />

The already mentioned observations for the vegetative development fenophase are<br />

generally true for the blooming fenophase, with the sole observation that there is a<br />

decreasing tendency of the chlorophyll content (a and b) for the majority of species, except<br />

for R. pimpinellifolia, where chlorophyll a content (2.215 mg compared to 1.448 mg in the<br />

previous stage), as well as chlorophyll b (0.772 mg compared to 0.483 mg) is going up,<br />

while for the exotic species R. multibtracteata and R. multiflora there is only a significant<br />

increase in chlorophyll a content (2.361 mg compared to 1.016 mg and 2.083 mg<br />

respectively, compared to 1.328 mg).<br />

In this fenophase, the ratio of these two types of chlorophyll slightly modifies its<br />

values, slightly superior to the 4/1 level in R. gallica among all the other aboriginal species<br />

and R. damascena among the alochtonous species. Most the species have a ratio between 3<br />

and 4/1. R. rubiginosa clearly distinguishes itself with a 1/0.141 ratio of chlorophyll a and b,<br />

where we can also notice on the one side a reduction in the total content of assimilating<br />

pigments (0.525 mg compared to 1.396 mg in the previous stage). On the other side, there is<br />

also a reverse in the ratio of the two types of chlorophyll in favour of chlorophyll b (Fig. 2).<br />

mg/100 g<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

R. canina<br />

R. gallica<br />

R. glauca<br />

R. pimpinellifolia<br />

R. rubiginosa<br />

R. damascena<br />

R. multibracteata<br />

R. multiflora<br />

Clorofila Chlorophyll a a Clorofila Chlorophyll b b Pigmenţi Carotenoid carotenoidici pigments<br />

Fig. 2. The assimilating pigments content variation for the investigated species of Rosa at the<br />

blooming fenophase stage


OBSERVATIONS ON THE FOLIAR ASSIMILATING PIGMENTS CONTENT FOR WILD AND…<br />

We must mention that during this fenophase the volatile substances content in the<br />

R. rubiginosa leaf is at its peak.<br />

At the start of the fructification one can notice an increase in the assimilating<br />

pigments content for the majority of the species combined with a decrease of the clorophyll<br />

a and b ratio under the 3/1 value. The value remains superior to this level only for R. canina<br />

(3.043/1). The content of carotenoid pigments slightly increases, reaching values between<br />

0.0006 and 0.0007 mg for the species R. pimpinellifolia, R. rubiginosa, R. glauca and R.<br />

rugosa (Fig. 3).<br />

mg/100 g<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

R. canina<br />

R. glauca<br />

R. pimpinellifolia<br />

Fig. 3. The assimilating pigments content variation for the investigated species of Rosa at the start of<br />

the fructification stage<br />

The ratio of assimilating and carotenoid pigments also displays extremely high<br />

values ranging from 3873/1 for R. rubiginosa and 6913/1 for R. canina.<br />

At the ripening of the fruits we notice a decrease in the content of assimilating<br />

pigments, with a ratio of assimilating pigments varying between 1.612/1 for R.<br />

multibracteata and 2.820/1 for R. rubiginosa. The ratio of assimilating pigments and<br />

carotenoid ones register high values between 3644/1 for R. gallica and 4411/1 for R.<br />

multibracteata (Fig. 4).<br />

The analysis of foliar assimilating pigments for cultivars at vegetative and<br />

generative stage (blooming) reveals a series of significant differences compared to the<br />

spontaneous species.<br />

First of all, there is a much higher chlorophyll b content than chlorophyll a at the<br />

majority of the taxons, at both harvestings. Secondly, the cultivars display larger quantities<br />

of carotenoid pigments compared to other species.<br />

50<br />

R. rubiginosa<br />

R. multibracteata<br />

R. rugosa<br />

Clorofila Chlorophyll a a Clorofila Chlorophyll b b Pigmenţi Carotenoid carotenoidici pigments


51<br />

ADUMITRESEI LIDIA & al.<br />

The chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b ratio, as well as the one for assimilating and<br />

carotenoid pigments presents itself as having totally different limits.<br />

mg/100 g<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

R. canina<br />

R. gallica<br />

R. glauca<br />

R. pimpinellifolia<br />

R. rubiginosa<br />

R. multibracteata<br />

Clorofila Chlorophyll a a Clorofila Chlorophyll b b Pigmenţi Carotenoid carotenoidici pigments<br />

R. rugosa<br />

Fig. 4. The assimilating pigments content variation for the investigated species of Rosa<br />

at the ripening stage<br />

For the cultivars at vegetative stage there is a low content in chlorophyll a<br />

varying between 0.048 mg for the cultivar ‘Cocktail’ and ‘M-me A. Meilland’ as well as<br />

‘President Briand’ (0.076 mg), with values closer to 0.1 mg for cultivars ‘Laminuette’,<br />

‘Rose Gaujard’ and ‘Pristine’, raising over 0.2 and 0.3 mg respectively for cultivars ‘Perla<br />

d’Alcanada’ (0.202 mg) and ‘Luchian’ (0.0308 mg). As far the chlorophyll b content is<br />

concerned, small quantities in absolute values (in these cases lower than in chlorophyll a)<br />

can be observed in the cultivars ‘Perla d’Alcanada’ (cu 0.016 mg), ‘Rose Gaujard’ (0.054<br />

mg) and ‘Luchian’ (0.225 mg). The other cultivars contain between 1.265 mg in the case of<br />

the cultivar ‘M-me A. Meilland’ and 1.691 mg in the case of cultivar ‘Pristine’ (Fig. 5).<br />

The chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b ratio diplays less than a unit values in the case<br />

of most cultivars, ranging from 0.038/1 for the cultivars ‘M-me A. Meilland’ and ‘Cocktail’<br />

and 0.071/1 for the cultivars ‘Laminuette’ and ‘Pristine’. Ratios over the unit can be seen in<br />

the cultivars ‘Luchian’ (1.369/1), ‘Rose Gaujard’ (2/1) and a much higher value for ‘Perla<br />

d’Alcanada’ (12.625/1).


OBSERVATIONS ON THE FOLIAR ASSIMILATING PIGMENTS CONTENT FOR WILD AND…<br />

mg/100 g<br />

1.800<br />

1.600<br />

1.400<br />

1.200<br />

1.000<br />

0.800<br />

0.600<br />

0.400<br />

0.200<br />

0.000<br />

Cocktail<br />

Laminuette<br />

Luchian<br />

M-me A. Meilland<br />

Perla d'Alcanada<br />

52<br />

Président Briand<br />

Pristine<br />

Rose Gaujard<br />

Clorofila Chlorophyll a a Clorofila Chlorophyll b b Pigmenţi Carotenoid carotenoidici pigments<br />

Fig. 5. The assimilating pigments content variation for the investigated species of Rosa at the<br />

vegetative stage<br />

The ratio of assimilating and carotenoid pigments comes in the case of cultivars<br />

close to the values mentioned by classic physiology, varying between (0.866/1) for the<br />

‘Rose Gaujard’ cultivar and 10.836/1 for the ‘Président Briand’ cultivar, while the other<br />

cultivars are aiming at one of these two poles: ‘Luchian’ (2.098/1) and ‘Perla d’Alcanada’<br />

(2.247/1) and between 8 and 9/1 respectively, in the case of the cultivars ‘Pristine’, ‘M-me<br />

A. Meilland’, ‘Laminuette’ and ‘Cocktail’.<br />

At the blooming fenophase there is, first of all, a high clorophyll b content, which<br />

varies between 1.297 mg for the ’Perla d’Alcanada’ cultivar and 2.264 mg for the ‘Rose<br />

Gaujard’ cultivar.<br />

Secondly, there is a low chlorophyll a content in all the examined cultivars,<br />

between the limits: 0.050 mg for ‘Perla d’Alcanada’, 0.075 mg for the ‘Pristine’ cultivar<br />

and 0.272 mg for the ‘Cocktail’ cultivar.<br />

Finally, there is a remarkable carotenoid pigments content, which in most cases<br />

overpasses the chlorophyll a content with two exceptions, the ‘Cocktail’ (with 0.272 mg<br />

chlorophyll a compared to 1.1 mg of carotenoid pigments) and ‘Rose Gaujard’ cultivars<br />

(chlorophyll a 0.216 mg, and carotenoid pigments 0,196 mg), but even in these cases the<br />

differences are small [TĂMAŞ & NEAMŢU, 1986].<br />

As a consequence, the chlorophyll a and b ratio is places less than a unit with<br />

extremely low values (between 0.039 for the ‘Perla d’Alcanada’ cultivar and 0.198 for the<br />

‘Cocktail’ cultivar).<br />

As it in vegetative stage, the ratio of chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments has<br />

values close to those mentioned in classic physiology textbooks (between 9.258 for the


53<br />

ADUMITRESEI LIDIA & al.<br />

‘Cocktail’ and ‘Laminuette’ cultivars and 12.713 mg for the ‘M-me A. Meilland’ cultivar)<br />

(Fig. 6).<br />

mg/100 g<br />

2.500<br />

2.000<br />

1.500<br />

1.000<br />

0.500<br />

0.000<br />

Cocktail<br />

Laminuette<br />

Luchian<br />

M-me A. Meilland<br />

Perla d'Alcanada<br />

Président Briand<br />

Pristine<br />

Rose Gaujard<br />

Clorofila Chlorophyll a a Clorofila Chlorophyll b b Pigmenţi Carotenoid carotenoidici pigments<br />

Fig. 6. The assimilating pigments content variation for the investigated cultivars of Rosa at the<br />

blooming fenophase stage<br />

The higher content of chlorophyll b compared to chlorophyll a is, according to<br />

concepts of the classic physiology, something particular of the shade plants, but the roses<br />

planted vegetated really well in full sunlight. It is possible that the cultivated roses need a<br />

much consistent protection screen since they bloomed better there than in the shade<br />

[ARGATU, 1989; WAGNER, 1978; KRÜSSMAN, 1986].<br />

According to the modern physiology concepts the chlorophyll and carotenoid<br />

pigments selectively absorb the radiations of light. Chlorophyll a presents a maximum<br />

absorption of the radiations with a wavelength of 700 and 435 nm respectively. Chlorophyll<br />

b has a maximum absorption of the radiations with the wavelength of 644 and 453 nm<br />

respectively, while the carotenoid pigments have a maximum absorption of the radiations<br />

within the wavelengths 400-480 nm. With this reality as a starting point, one may observe<br />

that the current roses cultivars have a more intense absorption of blue radiation<br />

[JITĂREANU, 2007 according to AUDERIRK & AUDERIRK, 1993].<br />

Conclusions<br />

In the case of spontaneous species chlorophyll a is predominant, the chlorophyll a<br />

and b ratio varying between 1.6-4/1, similar to the one described by classic physiology as<br />

being specific to plants that love sunlight.<br />

For the hybrid origin cultivars, chlorophyll b is predominant with an a/b ratio<br />

varying between 0.37-2/1, which would suggest that, according to classic physiology, these<br />

cultivars love shade. However, the field observations contradict it. According to the modern<br />

physiology concepts [JITĂREANU, 2007 according to AUDERIRK & AUDERIRK, 1993]


OBSERVATIONS ON THE FOLIAR ASSIMILATING PIGMENTS CONTENT FOR WILD AND…<br />

the chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments selectively absorb the light radiations. This is how<br />

the garden roses display a more intense absorbtion of blue radiations.<br />

The carotenoid pigments content is extremely low for spontaneous species (under<br />

ppm per mg/100 g fresh material), while for the cultivars it ranges within normal limits,<br />

with the values of 0.1-0.2 mg/100 g per fresh material.<br />

Most probably, together with the carotenoid pigments acting as protectors of the<br />

chlorophylls, there are other anthocyanic pigments present in large quantities in species and<br />

cultivars as well in all of the ontogenesis stages.<br />

References<br />

1. ADUMITRESEI L., STĂNESCU I. 2009. Theoretical considerations upon the origin and nomenclature of<br />

the present rose cultivars. J. Plant Develop., 16: 103-109.<br />

2. ARGATU C. 1989. Cercetări privind comportarea unor soiuri de trandafiri în condiţiile de la Vidra. Analele<br />

ICLF Vidra, XIV: 257-268.<br />

3. BOLDOR O., RAIANU O., TRIFU M. 1983. Fiziologia plantelor – lucrări practice. Bucureşti: Edit.<br />

Didactică şi Pedagogică, 290 pp.<br />

4. BURZO I., AMĂRIUŢEI A., VÂSCĂ Z. D. 2005. Fiziologia plantelor de cultură. Vol. VI. Fiziologia<br />

plantelor floricole. Bucureşti: Edit. Elisavaros, 293 pp.<br />

5. JITĂREANU C. D. 2007. Fiziologia plantelor. Iaşi: Edit. “Ion Ionescu de la Brad”, 500 pp.<br />

6. KRÜSSMANN G. 1986. Rosen, Rosen, Rosen: unser Wissen über die Rose. (2.Aufl.). Paul Parey Verlag,<br />

Berlin und Hamburg, 448 pp.<br />

7. MURARIU A. 2007. Fiziologie vegetală. Iaşi: Edit. Universităţii “Alexandru Ioan Cuza”, II: 292 pp.<br />

8. SINHA R. K. 2004. Modern plant physiology. Alpha Science International Ltd., UK: 256-275.<br />

9. TAIZ L., ZEIGER E. 2002. Plant physiology (4 th ed.). Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers Sunderland,<br />

Massachusetts, 620 pp.<br />

10. TAIZ L., ZEIGER E. 2006. Plant physiology (4 th ed.). Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers Sunderland,<br />

Massachusetts, 623 pp.<br />

11. TĂMAŞ V., NEAMŢU G. 1986. Pigmenţi carotenoidici şi metaboliţi. I, 245 pp.<br />

12. WAGNER Ş. 1978. Comportarea în câmp a unor soiuri de trandafir în condiţiile de la Cluj-Napoca. Analele<br />

ICLF Vidra. IV: 211-219.<br />

13. ZAMFIRACHE M-M. 2005. Fiziologie vegetală. Iaşi: Edit. Azimuth, I: 195 pp.<br />

14. ZAMFIRACHE M-M., TOMA C., BURZO I., ADUMITRESEI L., TOMA I., OLTEANU Z., MIHĂESCU<br />

D., TĂNĂSESCU V., APETREI R. I., SURDU Ş. 2006. Morphological, anatomical, biochemical and<br />

physiological researches upon taxa of Rosa genus cultivated in Iaşi <strong>Botanica</strong>l Garden (note II). The 4 th<br />

Conference on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants of South-East European Countries: 291-297.<br />

54


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 55-69<br />

55<br />

BALAEŞ TIBERIUS, TĂNASE CĂTĂLIN<br />

INTERRELATIONS BETWEEN THE MYCORRHIZAL SYSTEMS<br />

AND SOIL ORGANISMS<br />

BALAEŞ TIBERIUS 1 , TĂNASE CĂTĂLIN 1<br />

Abstract: The mycorrhizae are largely spread in natural ecosystems, and the proportion of plants that realise<br />

mycorrhizas is overwhelming, this relation involving advantages for both partners. The presence or<br />

absence of mycorrhizae, the rate and intensity of mycorrhiza formation are aspects with ecological<br />

importance, but also present importance in modern agriculture. The research results published on<br />

international literature which views the principal relations between mycorrhizae and soil microbiota,<br />

the way in which these relations affect the intensity of mycorrhizae formation and also the efficiency<br />

of mycorrhizae under the influence of soil organisms are synthesized and commented in this paper.<br />

The relations between mycorrhizae and different categories of bacteria, protozoa or microfungi, as<br />

well the influence of invertebrates through interactions of them with microorganisms are also being<br />

analyzed.<br />

Key words: mycorrhizae, interrelations, rhizosphere<br />

Introduction<br />

The presence of mycorrhizae makes possible the coexistence of symbiotic<br />

organisms in hostile environment or in places where the competition is very strong. In this<br />

way, the mycorrhizal partners present advantages and benefits that allow them to develop<br />

or reproduce in underoptimal conditions or to become competitive, being able to survive.<br />

These are natural constant mutualistic associations between the roots of plants and soil<br />

fungi. The purpose of these relations is to obtain anorganic nutrients by the plants and<br />

organic nutrients by the fungi in an easily and efficiently way. Fungal species that form<br />

mycorrhizae are taking up to 25% from photosynthesis products of plants and they can<br />

contribute with P and N up to 80% of plant necessary [MEYER & al. 2010].<br />

Mycorrhizae are morphological and physiological different, and the interactions<br />

between mycorrhizal species are also different. The mycorrhizae types and the distribution of<br />

them in terrestrial bioms are being influenced by the climatic factors, soil composition and<br />

participant species, as well by the composition of soil organisms communities. The influence<br />

of mycorrhizae over the distribution in ecosystems of plant species is major, playing an active<br />

role in qualitatively and quantitatively modelling the ecosystems structure. In nature, the<br />

mycorrhizal species establish extremely complex relations with soil organisms, the formation<br />

of mycorrhizae often leads to qualitative and quantitative modifications of soil biota, the<br />

process being reciprocal, so soil organisms may play a decisive role on the way and intensity<br />

of mycorrhiza formation. As plants are a valuable source of nutrients for many categories of<br />

1 “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iaşi, Bd. Carol I, no. 11, 700 506, Iaşi – Romania<br />

e-mail: tiberius_balaes@yahoo.com, tanase@uaic.ro


INTERRELATIONS BETWEEN THE MYCORRHIZAL SYSTEMS AND SOIL ORGANISMS<br />

soil organisms, they represent the centre of different types of interrelations, competition or<br />

cooperation, in order to gain access to these nutrients.<br />

The fungal symbiont occupies a special position in these relations, its presence in<br />

rhizosphere leading to profound modifications of microrhizosphere community structure.<br />

According to the effects of soil microorganisms on mycorrhiza formation and functioning,<br />

they can be beneficial, neutral or they can negatively affect the functionality of<br />

mycorrhizae.<br />

There is a possibility of using some microorganisms that can significantly reduce<br />

negative effects of the pathogens or microorganisms that directly or indirectly stimulate<br />

plants growth and development (through stimulation of mycorrhiza formation). In order to<br />

use it, it is necessary to elucidate the complex mechanisms established between mycorrhizal<br />

species and other categories of microorganisms on a hand, and on the other hand to<br />

elaborate the efficient schemes and methods of utilisation such beneficial microorganisms<br />

in agriculture, forestry, ecological reconstruction etc.<br />

The researches of Roumanian specialists concerning mycorrhizae were initiated half<br />

century ago [ŞESAN & al. 2010]. These researches approached the symbiosis in general and<br />

mechanisms determinated by mycorrhizae (ALDEA, ZARNEA, ZAMFIRACHE, TOMA,<br />

MAXIMILIAN, CARASAN etc.). Some authors (CHIRA, IORDACHE, NEAGOE etc.)<br />

were highlighting particular aspects of ecto- or endomycorrhizae. ALDEA, CHIRA,<br />

BRĂILOIU etc. had studied the mycorrhizal impact to the economical important plants.<br />

The concerns of researchers regarding the interactions between mycorrhizal<br />

species and soil microorganisms had generally targeted the plants protection and the<br />

reduction of frequency and severity of the phytopathogens attack [IACOMI & al. 2010]. It<br />

has been discovered that some microorganisms are frequently associated with mycorrhizae,<br />

their action being positive in relation with fungal symbiont, protecting the plant against the<br />

pathogens. In the last decades, the interest concerning elucidation of the mechanisms<br />

involved in establishing the complex interactions of the mycorrhizosphere and their role in<br />

protecting and stimulating plant development had increased.<br />

The mycorrhizal systems – clarification<br />

The mycorrhizae are symbiotic association, during which specific fungi are<br />

colonizing plants rootlets. In this type of relation, pathogenity and lesion of root structures<br />

are normally missing and the fungal invasion is blocked by the plant. Mycorrhizal plants<br />

are better developed than non-mycorrhizal plants. In this relation, plants are providing<br />

organic compounds for the fungal symbiont, and receive, in exchange, anorganic nutrients<br />

absorbed by hyphae. Due to the small size of hyphae, the absorptive surface and the<br />

explored volume of soil are very large, and the formation of root hairs is no longer<br />

necessary. Thus, the functions of mycelium become complementary to the root function.<br />

The mycorrhization represents a common phenomenon in ecosystems and it is<br />

characteristic for very different taxa, from the bryophytes to angiosperm. It is estimated that<br />

over 90% of terrestrial plants realise vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae [ENE & al. 2010],<br />

adding to them the plants that realise other types of mycorrhizae. A few groups of vascular<br />

plants do not realise mycorrhizae at all, these usually living in wet habitats. The fungal<br />

invasion is limited by the plant, being located to the cortex level, in intercellular position (at<br />

ectomycorrhizae) and with intracellular ramification (at endomycorrhizae).<br />

The hyphae are not colonizing tannins or calcium oxalate containing cells neither<br />

the organs apices. In the case of endomycorrhizae, arbusculs, vesicles and even hyphae are<br />

frequently lysed, their content being spilled in the cells of the host [ZAMFIRACHE &<br />

56


BALAEŞ TIBERIUS, TĂNASE CĂTĂLIN<br />

TOMA, 2000]. Some mycorrhizal species are considered common and spread in different<br />

habitats, and other species considered rare are forming mycorrhizae only with some host<br />

plants [FODOR & al. 2010].<br />

Interspecific signals in the mycorrhizal systems<br />

The functions of the root can be influenced by mycorrhizae, in response to the<br />

rhizosphere action and soil fertility. These factors control the root architecture, reducing the<br />

ramification level and growing the dependency of plant for the symbiotic fungi<br />

[ZAMFIRACHE & TOMA, 2000].<br />

The mycosymbiont becomes associated to the plant root and avoids the defence<br />

mechanisms. These processes are being initiated by the exchange of specific signals<br />

between both partners. The signalling is a process remarkably complex, involving different<br />

molecular mechanisms. In the early stages of the mycorrhiza formation, H2O2 plays a<br />

signalling role, and in a similar manner, the efflux of Cl<br />

57<br />

- and K + and the influx of Ca 2+ and<br />

extracellular alkalization [HEBE & al. 1999]. The higher concentrations of<br />

monosaccharides at the root-soil interface are leading to the activation of some<br />

physiological modifications in the fungal metabolism which play a signalling role. On the<br />

other hand, the presence of nitrogen compounds with fungal origins induces some<br />

modifications in the radicular metabolism [HAMPP & al. 1999]. The degradation rate of<br />

the organic compound with N is controlled by the plants through the C resources given to<br />

fungi for extracellular enzymes synthesis [TALBOT & TRESEDER, 2009].<br />

After these preparatory mechanisms of metabolic activation, is following a<br />

specific recognition phase mediated by phytohormones secreted by both the plants and the<br />

fungi, the process being bidirectional. Transport inhibitors of auxine and the compounds<br />

that release ethylene are activating the root ramification, a process that can be stopped by<br />

the ethylene synthesis inhibitors. In the mycorrhizal formation processes morphological<br />

modifications of root cells are interfering, modifications which are controlled through gene<br />

activity regulation by fungal or plant phytohormones (auxines, ethylene, abscisic acid). The<br />

root exudates secreted during fungal inoculation, induce defense mechanisms against the<br />

pathogens [DUCHESNE, 1989].<br />

REQUENA & al. (2007) proved that some flavonoidic compounds from the root<br />

exudates are increasing the spores germination and the hyphal growth and development.<br />

Also, during the formation of the mycorrhiza, the fungi are influencing the expression of<br />

genes involved in phenylpropanoids, flavonoids and isoflavonoids radicular metabolism.<br />

The rutin induces hyphal growth, and hypaphorine, an auxine analogous indolic<br />

compound, inhibits the root hairs elongation [NEHLS & al. 1998].<br />

In the infective phase, proteosynthesis modifications take place, at least 50% from<br />

the both symbiotic partners proteins being synthesised in concentrations that differ from the<br />

concentration in which they are synthesised in a separate development of symbionts<br />

[DUCHESNE, 1989]. Some polyamines produced by fungal mycelium, have roles in the<br />

plants germination processes [NEHLS, 1998].<br />

The hyphal adhesion is influenced by some hyphal wall compounds, as<br />

hydrophobines, cysteine-reached proteins, α-tubulin and actin [TIMONEN & al. 1996].<br />

During the penetration of the root by the hyphae, low defensive responses are<br />

activated in plant organism, such as peroxidases production and proteins phosphorylation<br />

modifications. During a root infection made by a pathogenic fungal species, the plant<br />

reaction is strong and invariable, by contrary, the root infection made by a mycorrhizal


INTERRELATIONS BETWEEN THE MYCORRHIZAL SYSTEMS AND SOIL ORGANISMS<br />

species is permitted by the plant. In physiological stress conditions, the production of such<br />

compounds increases, the fungal or plant metabolism being modified by them, with the<br />

purpose to adapt to the new conditions. The indol acetic acid of fungal origins controls the<br />

root morphological changes [GAY & al. 1994].<br />

The types of mycorrhizae<br />

The morphology of mycorrhizae can deeply vary along with the type of relations<br />

between plant-host and the fungal species and with the environmental condition. The<br />

endomycorrhizae do not have a varied external morphology, but the ectomycorrhizae have<br />

different colours, shapes, sizes, which are characteristic to the participating species. A<br />

particular type is represented by peritrophic mycorrhizae, this being a stable relation<br />

between partners, in which the fungi develop around the root and form a mycelial network<br />

without having a direct contact with them.<br />

The ectomycorrhizae are symbiotic associations in which the fungal mycelium<br />

develops in strong contact with the roots, forming a mantle that covers the apice of the root.<br />

They are characteristic for many trees. There has been proposed different ectomycorrhizae<br />

classification systems based on morphological characteristics: colour (yellow, orange, red,<br />

brown, violet, black etc.) sizes, ramification types (non-ramificated, dichotomic branched,<br />

coralloids etc.) the sizes and shapes of rhizomorphs etc. A recent proposed criteria is based<br />

on the exploring type of substrate by the extramatrical mycelium, this having ecological<br />

importance [AGERER, 2001].<br />

The ectoendomycorrhizae represent intermediate forms between ectomycorrhizae<br />

and endomycorrhizae, some authors placing them in the latter group.<br />

The endomycorrhizae are formed on the young rootlets, presenting only<br />

intercellular hyphae, which have well developed haustoria in root cortical cells. The<br />

haustoria can be twisted or divided, being named arbuscules. In some cases, mycelial<br />

hyphae can get through the entire organism of a plant.<br />

There are different categories of endotrophic mycorrhizae, some of them being<br />

characteristic for specific groups of plant: monotropoid mycorrhizae are present at<br />

Monotropa hypopitis, ericoid mycorrhizae found at species from Ericaceae and<br />

Epacridaceae, arbutoid mycorrhizae characteristic for species from Pyrolaceae and some<br />

species from Ericaceae, orchidean mycorrhizae present at Orchidaceae species. The<br />

vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae are being formed by the most of the plants, the involved<br />

fungal species having a siphonal structure.<br />

The influence of the mycorrhizae on soil organisms<br />

The modification process of soil properties and of soil microbiota is bidirectional,<br />

based on “first to come” rule. The inhibition mechanisms are represented by the<br />

competition for the C and energy sources, and also by the production of antibiotics or other<br />

inhibitory compounds. If the mycorrhizal species do not find in the environment, in preinfective<br />

phases, beneficial microorganisms, the chances of survival and colonizing a host<br />

decrease.<br />

According to ALBERTSEN & al. (2006), associated bacteria play an important<br />

role in vesicular-arbuscular fungi development in the organic matter. The process is<br />

bidirectional, because the teluric microorganisms respond to the mycorrhizal species<br />

extramatrical mycelium growth.<br />

58


BALAEŞ TIBERIUS, TĂNASE CĂTĂLIN<br />

According to RAIESI & GHOLLARATA (2006), the glomaline released by this<br />

fungi has negative effects on microbial respiration, this leading to the decrease of organic<br />

matter degradation rate from soil.<br />

By secreting mixtures of selective substances, plants will create selective conditions<br />

for developing the rhizosphere organisms. The plants are exudating a variety of chemical<br />

compounds and anorganic ions, mucilages, also antimicrobial compounds with role in<br />

defending the host. Also, the mycorrhizal species mycelium releases some exudates that<br />

contain organic compounds that stimulate the development of a hyphospheric microbiota, but<br />

in a lower quantity than that produced by the plants [ANDRADE & al. 1997].<br />

In this manner, the host plant and its symbiotic partner mycelium are “selecting”<br />

bacteria that are beneficial for their relation [TARKKA & al. 2009].<br />

After this selections, microbial communities will be dominated by some bacterial<br />

groups [HRŠELOVÁ & al. 1999; WELSH & al. 2010]. These bacteria stimulate the<br />

mycorrhizae development, but are also complementary to the functions of mycorrhizae, as<br />

nutrients absorption and biological control of the host plant [FREY-KLETT & al. 2007;<br />

cited by TARKKA & al. 2009]. The bacterial diversity in hyphosphere seems to be lower<br />

compared to the free soil [GRYNDLER & al. 2000], the gram negative bacteria prevailing<br />

[VOSÁTKA, 1996; cited by BAREA & al. 2002].<br />

However, BIANCIOTTO & BONFANTE (2002) observed that there is a big<br />

specific diversity in the rhizosphere of mycorrhizal plants compared to the rhizosphere of<br />

non-mycorrhizal plants. The mycosphere participates to P recycling process from organic<br />

or anorganic compounds [BAREA & al. 2002]. The mycorrhizal associated<br />

microorganisms modify, also, the composition of mycorrhizosphere microbiota. In this<br />

way, Streptomyces AcH505, which colonizes the mycelium of ectomycorrhizal species<br />

Amanita muscaria, produces auxofuran, an antibiotic that modifies hyphospheric<br />

microbiota [RIEDLINGER & al. 2006, cited by HARTMANN & al. 2009].<br />

The Bulkholderia cepacia species is frequently present as free in<br />

mycorrhizosphere, but it has not been isolated from free soil or from the non-mycorrhizal<br />

plants rhizosphere.<br />

Interrelations between the mycorrhizal systems and the soil microbiota<br />

Between soil microbiota, the mycorrhizal species and plants are establishing<br />

extremely complex relations, with positive effects [AZCÓN-AGUILAR & BAREA, 1985]<br />

or negative effects [LARSEN & al. 2009] over the mycorrhization rate and over these<br />

processes efficiency. The root exudates are a valuable nutritive resource for rhizospheric<br />

microorganisms, qualitative and quantitative properties of these root exudates are<br />

influencing those interrelations established between organisms from this level.<br />

Many soil microorganisms can be considered as being neutral, because they do not<br />

bring a benefit nor a loss for the plant host or the mycorrhizal species. However, these<br />

organisms influence the soil activity and properties, contributing to organic matter<br />

mineralization or can be involved in different physico-chemical processes. Although these<br />

organisms do not directly interact with the plants, the processes in which they are involved<br />

might have influence over the plant development. The rhizospheric bacteria are bacteria<br />

already present in the soil and, as a result of the soil conditions modification (roots<br />

development) they find favourable niches to abundantly develop. The rhizospheric<br />

microorganisms can have different activities: pathogenic activity, plant protection,<br />

antibiotics productions etc.<br />

59


INTERRELATIONS BETWEEN THE MYCORRHIZAL SYSTEMS AND SOIL ORGANISMS<br />

Many categories of rhizospheric bacteria have the capacity of stimulating the plant<br />

development beyond the presence of the mycorrhizal species. For these species, it was used<br />

the acronym PGPR (Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria) by LINDERMAN [1992,<br />

cited by AZCÓN-AGUILAR & BAREA, 1997], including both free and nodulating<br />

nitrogen fixing bacteria, soil phosphate solubilising bacteria, as well the bacteria that<br />

produce plant growth stimulators or pathogens inhibitors. But when they are both present,<br />

the mycorrhizal species and PGPR present complementary functions.<br />

The mechanisms by which some microorganisms can inhibit mycorrhizal<br />

development are diverse: they can compete for nutrients [MIRANSARI, 2009] both with<br />

mycorrhizal species in preinfective phase, sometimes even in postinfective phase, and with<br />

favourable microorganisms. On the other hand, non-favourable microorganisms can<br />

directly inhibit the fungi by releasing the antifungal toxins, or indirectly by releasing the<br />

phytotoxines, bactericidal or bacteriostatic substances and by modifying the soil properties<br />

(pH modification or ratio between different substances in the soil) or they can be<br />

pathogenic for fungi and for plants. Other microorganisms are attached to the fungal spores<br />

or to the hyphae surfaces [MIRANSARI, 2011], using them as vectors for colonizing the<br />

root plants (BIANCIOTTO & al. 2000; cited by BAREA & al. 2002].<br />

Bulkholderia, Ralstonia and Pandora are endobacteria of some vesiculararbuscular<br />

fungi. It has been discovered that these bacteria are constantly present at<br />

Gigasporaceae [RUIZ-LOZANO & BONFANTE, 2001; BIANCIOTTO & BONFANTE,<br />

2002] and that fungal species without endosymbiont develop abnormally.<br />

Although there have been made many studies regarding the composition of<br />

microbial community from rhizosphere, up to 90% of rhizospheric microorganisms remain<br />

unstudied [GOODMAN & al. 1998; cited by BUÉE & al. 2009], as a result of the<br />

unrecovery on artificial media. By means of modern techniques, recently developed, this<br />

number has been reduced.<br />

FULTHORPE & al. [2008; cited by BUÉE & al. 2009] have analyzed soil<br />

samples, by sequencing some nucleic acid molecules, soil samples that have been collected<br />

from different biogeographical regions, proving that there are other dominant taxonomical<br />

groups of bacteria than previously proposed (through isolation on artificial media). The<br />

bacterial communities from rhizosphere fluctuate with root growth, and by that, the densest<br />

communities will be found in root hairs regions [BUÉE & al. 2009].<br />

Interrelations between the mycorrhizal systems and the nodulating nitrogen<br />

fixing bacteria<br />

Many studies have been focused over the double inoculation of plant with<br />

mycorrhizal species and nodulating nitrogen fixing bacteria [AZCÓN-AGUILAR &<br />

BAREA, 1997; SIVIERO & al. 2008; GUTIÉRREZ-MICELI & al. 2008; BAREA & al.<br />

2002], because of its applicability in agriculture. These bacteria colonize the roots of some<br />

nodules forming plants, and at their level, in different biochemical processes, nitrogenous is<br />

synthesized in compounds available by plants using molecular nitrogen. For the plants, this<br />

colonization is beneficial, but this involves the reduction of saccharides available for fungi,<br />

the effect being the reduction of mycorrhization rate. Nevertheless, a good development of<br />

the plants implies an increase of the exudation rate by root plants which lead to a better<br />

fungal development. This hypothesis was confirmed by double inoculation, with<br />

mycorrhizal species and Rhizobium strains [TOBAR & al. 1996; SIVIERO & al. 2008], the<br />

authors reported an increase of mycorrhizal units number. TIAN & al. (2003) found a better<br />

60


BALAEŞ TIBERIUS, TĂNASE CĂTĂLIN<br />

development of Robinia pseudacacia plantlets by triple inoculation: with endomycorrhizal<br />

species, ectomycorrhizal species and Rhizobium strains, compared to the double inoculation<br />

or simple inoculation.<br />

Interrelations between the mycorrhizal systems and free nitrogen fixing<br />

bacteria<br />

The free nitrogen fixing bacteria have positive effects on plants development. One<br />

might say that their activity could negatively influence mycorrhiza formation by increasing<br />

nitrogenous compounds available for plants meaning the reduction of plant dependency for<br />

mycorrhizae, but experimental results obtained by GUTIÉRREZ-MICELI & al. (2008)<br />

infirmed this assumption, being noticed positive effects on the mycorrhization rate. The coinoculation<br />

of Azospirillum and Glomus mosseae made the two species act synergistically,<br />

offering nutrients to plants, nutrients which contain same quantity of N and P as by<br />

administration of artificial fertilizers. Some strains of Azospirillum and Paenibacillus have<br />

stimulated the vesicular-arbuscular mycelium growth and the mycorrhiza formation<br />

[BAREA & al. 2002; BIACIOTTO & BONFANTE, 2002]. However, contradictory results<br />

obtained by ZUBEK and colabs. (2009) proved that these processes depend on involved<br />

organisms genome.<br />

The Burkholderia species are bacteria capable of fixing molecular nitrogen, often<br />

isolated from mycorrhizosphere. These bacteria are able to stimulate plant growth and<br />

contribute to mineral resources bioavailability [KOELE & al. 2009]. The mycorrhizal<br />

species and some bacteria cooperate in soil transformation. These mechanisms imply the<br />

roots presence which improve nutrient content in rhizospheric microhabitat and sustain the<br />

bacterial inoculum stability [SIVIERO & al. 2008].<br />

The mycorrhizal species increase the surviving rate of these bacteria in<br />

rhizosphere, thus Azotobacter paspali develops better in Paspalum notatum rhizosphere<br />

when plants are mycorrhizated [BAREA & al. 1983]. Similarly, nitrogen fixing bacteria<br />

isolated from Drossera villosa rhizosphere stimulated the rice roots and stalks growth when<br />

they were co-inoculated with Glomus claroideum [GUTIÉRREZ-MICELI & al. 2008].<br />

Interrelations between the mycorrhizal systems and the mycorrhiza<br />

promoting bacteria<br />

Some of bacteria can directly stimulate the mycorrhiza formation by releasing<br />

some stimulatory compounds as auxines, gibberellines and citokinins, substances that<br />

influence the root morphology and physiology and contribute to the qualitative and<br />

quantitative modification of the root exudates, with direct effects on fungi. These bacteria<br />

also produce vitamins and organic acids that stimulate spores germination. Helper bacteria<br />

produce hypaphorine type phenolic compounds that increase fungal agressivity<br />

[GARBAYE, 1994, cited by DUPONNOIS & PLENCHETTE, 2003]. However, the effect<br />

depends on the inoculum size, if the dose is suboptimal there are not any beneficial effects,<br />

if the dose exceeds the optimal values there are negatively effects, possible due to antibiosis<br />

effect or resources consumption [FREY-KLETT & al. 1999]. Some fungal species colonize<br />

the roots only in extreme habitats by reason of microorganisms competition lack [BOWEN<br />

& THEODORU, 1978].<br />

Some authors [VIVAS & al. 2003; MARULANDA & al. 2006] reported positive<br />

effects of Bacillus thuringiensis inoculation over the mycorrhizal species extra- and<br />

61


INTERRELATIONS BETWEEN THE MYCORRHIZAL SYSTEMS AND SOIL ORGANISMS<br />

interradicular development, increasing the mycorrhizal intensity and the extramatrical<br />

mycelium growing rate. For these bacteria it is used the acronym: MHB – mycorrhizal<br />

helper bacteria. Similarly, co-inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense or Bacillus<br />

amyloliquefaciens [OANCEA & al. 2010] as well as coinoculation of Enterobacter<br />

agglomerans with Glomus etunicatum [KIM & al. 1998] leaded to a better mycorrhizal<br />

species development.<br />

In savannas, the mycorrhization rate was high when microclimatic conditions were<br />

favorable for rhizospheric bacteria development [LÓPEZ-GUTIÉRREZ & al. 2004]. The<br />

inoculation with ectomycorrhizal species success depends on fungal surviving in soil during<br />

preinfective phase, and this may be correlated to the helper bacteria presence.<br />

Many studies confirmed the efficacy in stimulating and potentiationing of<br />

mycorrhization effects of helper bacteria from Pseudomonas, Ralstonia and Bacillus<br />

genera: Pseudomonas fluorescens [DUNSTAN & al. 1998; BRULÉ & al., 2001;<br />

GAMALERO & al. 2004, cited by HAMEEDA & al. 2007], Pseudomonas putida<br />

[KOZDRÓJ & al. 2007], Pseudomonas aeruginosa [KOTHAMASI & al. 2006],<br />

Pseudomonas monteillii [REDDELL & WARREN, 1986, cited by DUPONNOIS &<br />

PLENCHETTE, 2003], Bacillus subtilis [DUNSTAN & al. 1998; BRULÉ & al. 2001],<br />

Ralstonia sp. [KATAOKA & FUTAI, 2009; HRYNKIEWICZ & al. 2010].<br />

Similar effects have been reported in the case of actinomycetes. These organisms<br />

stimulated Amanita muscaria mycorrhization concomitantly with the inhibition of the<br />

pathogen: Armillaria obscura and Heterobasidion annosum [MAIER & al. 2004], or<br />

hyphal growth induction realised by Streptomyces strains [SCHREY & al. 2007]. Also,<br />

some oxalobacteriaceae stimulated Glomus mosseae in vitro growth [MIRANSARI, 2011].<br />

There are some spores associated to the bacteria as Stenotrophomonas and<br />

Arthrobacter, with favourable effects on the spores germination [BHARADWAJ & al. 2008].<br />

Some saprotrophic fungi, as Trichoderma hartzianum [IACOMI & al. 2010] can<br />

stimulate helper bacteria effects, showing in this manner a multilevel synergistical effect.<br />

There is a strong correlation between rhizospheric microbial species and<br />

mycorrhizal ones [DUNSTAN & al. 1998], the helper bacteria beneficial effects over the<br />

mycorrhizae being fungi-specific. In the studies realised by PIVATO & al. (2009),<br />

Pseudomonas fluorescens differently stimulated the development of some Glomus species.<br />

Different studies [FRANCO-CORREA & al. 2010; CALVARUSO al. 2007]<br />

revealed the fact that many actinomycetes species isolated from mycorrhizosphere had the<br />

capacity to solubilise Phosphorus from organic and anorganic soil sources, as well the<br />

capacity to produce siderophores or to fix Nitrogen. These bacteria have a more abundantly<br />

development in mycorrhizosphere comparing with their development in non-mycorrhizal<br />

plants rhizosphere.<br />

ASPARY & al. (2006) showed a high level of dependency between the helper<br />

bacteria strains and different mycorrhizal species. These results have been confirmed by<br />

other researchers [AZCÓN, 1989]. Some Bacillus subtilis strains stimulate Suillus<br />

granulatus development, but inhibit the development of Rhizopogon [KATAOKA & al.<br />

2009]. Also, in a research realised by XIAO & al. (2008), Bacillus subtilis significantly<br />

decreased Zea mays roots colonization frequency by the mycorrhizal species (from 75% at<br />

55.6%), inhibiting spores germination and hyphal growth, contrary to VIVAS & al. (2003)<br />

observations.<br />

62


63<br />

BALAEŞ TIBERIUS, TĂNASE CĂTĂLIN<br />

Interrelations between the mycorrhizal systems and phytopathogens<br />

The mycorrhizal species directly protect the host plant by releasing some<br />

compounds toxic to pathogens [ZARNEA, 1994], mechanical protection of the root<br />

[ZAMFIRACHE & TOMA, 2000] or by activating host plant defence mechanisms through<br />

modulating the salicic acid and jasmonate metabolism [MIRANSARI, 2011] or flavonoids<br />

metabolism [NEHLS & al. 1998], or indirectly by alterationing the microbial community<br />

structure due to the induction of the qualitative and quantitative changes of root exudates<br />

and also due to the stimulation of some favourable antagonistic microorganisms.<br />

Negative correlations between vesicular-arbuscular fungi and the rhizospheric<br />

pathogens have been observed [WEHNER & al. 2010]. There are some variations of soil<br />

pathogens inhibiting capacity depending on fungal species.<br />

Some mycorrhizal species [BOWEN & THEODORU, 1978] or the associated<br />

helper bacteria [LI & al. 2007; SIASON & al. 2009, cited by WEHNER, 2010] produce<br />

antibiotics against phytopathogens like: Phytophthora cinnamomi, Pythium<br />

aphanidermatum or Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. Pseudomonas putida is<br />

antagonistic to Cylindrocarpon destructans, Pythium ultimum & Rhizoctonia solani [GU &<br />

MAZZOLA, 2003, cited by BUÉE & al. 2009].<br />

According to AZCÓN-AGUILAR & BAREA (1997) the bacteria from<br />

Rhizobacterium genera can be used as biocontroling agents. Similarly, Bacillus subtilis and<br />

Pseudomonas fluorescens strains have antagonistic reactions against pathogens, being<br />

stimulated by the presence of mycorrhizae [SCHELKLE & PETERSON, 1996; AZCÓN-<br />

AGUILAR & BAREA, 1997; NEERAJ & SINGH, 2010].<br />

Some Streptomyces strains that colonize Norway Spruce ectomycorrhizae, protect<br />

the plant against the attack of Heterbasidion annosum [LEHR & al. 2007; cited by<br />

HARTMANN & al. 2009]. The bacteria often have the capacity of degrading the toxins<br />

produced by phytopathogenic fungi or viral factors of them [COMPANT & al. 2005].<br />

Interrelations between the mycorrhizal systems and saprotrophic fungi<br />

The competition for nutritive resources is the most frequent relation established<br />

between mycorrhizal species and soil saprotrophic fungi. In McALLISTER & al. (1994)<br />

experiments, the inoculation of Lactuca sativa rhizosphere with Trichoderma koningii or<br />

Fusarium solani strains before inoculation with Glomus mosseae lead to development<br />

inhibition of the last. These effects have not been observed in the case of initial inoculation<br />

with Glomus mosseae. As mycorrhizal species are colonizing the hosts roots, the relations<br />

with saprotrophic fungi are changing, acting often synergistically for making bioavailable<br />

some minerals needed by plants. Many telluric species of fungi have strong reactions<br />

against phytopathogenic fungi.<br />

AZCÓN-AGUILAR & BAREA (1997) reported synergistical relations between<br />

Glomus and Trichoderma species concerning inhibiting Fusarium attacks at tomatoes or<br />

Pythium attacks al potatoes. By influencing soil microbiota, mycorrhizal species influence,<br />

also, the saprotrophic fungal activity, through inhibition processes [TIUNOV & SCHEU,<br />

2005] or through direct or indirect stimulation.


INTERRELATIONS BETWEEN THE MYCORRHIZAL SYSTEMS AND SOIL ORGANISMS<br />

Interrelations between the mycorrhizal systems and protozoans<br />

In the rhizosphere, the protozoans are able to release nutrients with the<br />

consumption of the microorganisms. By consuming preferentially some bacteria, the<br />

protozoans change the bacterial community structure which leads to modifications in<br />

protozoans community, therefore a fast feed-back [RØNN & al. 2002].<br />

The presence of the mycorrhizae can negatively influence protozoans community,<br />

indirectly by alteration the soil bacterial community in an unfavourable way for the<br />

protozoans or directly by production of some inhibitory compounds [RØNN & al. 2002].<br />

The presence of protozoans has opposite effects to mycorrhizal species,<br />

stimulating the root ramification [BONKOWSKI & al. 2001].<br />

Both microbial systems are beneficial and complementary for the plants, because<br />

the ectomycorrhizal species increase bioavailability of Phosphorus, and protozoans increase<br />

bioavailability of Nitrogen. However, the presence of both categories of organisms leads to<br />

an increasing competition for the plant secreted carbohydrats and their numerical reduction<br />

[TIMONEN & al. 2004; cited by HERDLER & al. 2008]. Different studies [HERDLER &<br />

al. 2008; OLSSON & al. 1996, cited by BONKOWSKI & al. 2001] revealed the fact that<br />

double inoculation, with protozoans and with fungi, strongly stimulated the biomass<br />

production of plants, concomitantly with the population significantly reduction of both<br />

categories of organisms.<br />

Interrelations between the mycorrhizal systems and invertebrates<br />

Although, the direct interactions between mycorrhizal species and the soil fauna<br />

are limited, they do exist. Among the soil animals that interact with mycorrhizal species<br />

and their host plant, there are different categories of invertebrates such as: insects,<br />

nematodes, annelids, mites etc. Many insect species (often larval stages) as well as<br />

nematodes, consume or attack both plant roots and mycelium (colemboles), affecting in this<br />

way the mycorrhizal symbiosis.<br />

A particularly interesting relation is represented by earthworms. The colonization<br />

rate has been better when plants were inoculated with mycorrhizal species in the presence<br />

of earthworms from Pheretina [ZAREA & al. 2009], their action being beneficial for<br />

mycorrhizae through several mechanisms: earthworms can produce phytohormons, and<br />

their excrement may contain ten times more propagules than the soil [GANGE, 1993, cited<br />

by ZAREA & al. 2009]. Adding earthworms lead to increase the harvest of Trifolium by<br />

improving the soil chemical properties and by producing the plant regulatory compounds<br />

due to microbial activity stimulations by earthworms [QUAGGIOTTI & al. 2004, cited by<br />

ZAREA & al. 2009]. The earthworms increase the number of free nitrogen fixing bacteria<br />

by qualitative modifications of the soil (modification of porosity and aggregation) and by<br />

improving plant water and oxygen uptake. The earthworms, also, stimulate the production<br />

of exudates and create microhabitats [ZAREA & al. 2009].<br />

Many species of colenbolas feed with mycorrhizal species, although they prefer<br />

saprotrophic fungi [GANGE, 2001; cited by TIUNOV & SCHEU, 2005]. Colembolas feed<br />

with mycorrhizal species only when insects population reach high density levels. By<br />

feeding with saprotrophic fungal species, colembolas destabilize the soil fungal community,<br />

making them more susceptible to be influenced by the mycorrhizal species [TIUNOV &<br />

SCHEU, 2005].<br />

64


Conclusions<br />

65<br />

BALAEŞ TIBERIUS, TĂNASE CĂTĂLIN<br />

Mycorrhiza forming species strongly modify the structure and dimension of<br />

rhizospheric microorganisms, either by direct interactions, or indirectly by influencing the<br />

release of the root exudates in rhizosphere.<br />

The mycorrhizae exercise, generally, a strong selective pressure on rhizospheric<br />

habitats, stimulating the development of mutualistic or comensal microbiota.<br />

The mycorrhizae influence all the relations established between different<br />

categories of organisms in rhizospheric microhabitats under late succesional stages, and in<br />

young rhizospaheric microhabitats the myrorrhizations success depends on the microbial<br />

community already established.<br />

The plant benefits from all of mutualistic relations established between<br />

mycorrhizal species and the soil organisms, while the fungal partner often competes with<br />

different soil organisms for the plant carbohydrates.<br />

The elucidation of the intimate mechanisms that underline the structure of<br />

microbial community and the processes that influence the mycorrhizal intensity and rate are<br />

premises in the elaboration of the efficient ecological reconstruction strategies or for the<br />

sustainable agriculture development.<br />

There are needed some extensive researches concerning signal phase prior to<br />

tripartite mutualistic relations development and the involved factors, in order to use and<br />

optimize them in the purpose of integrated pest management strategies development.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

This work was supported by the the European Social Fund in Romania, under the<br />

responsibility of the Managing Authority for the Sectoral Operational Programme for<br />

Human Resources Development 2007-2013 [grant POSDRU/107/1.5/S/78342]. The first<br />

author is also grateful to Prof. univ. dr. Cătălin Tănase for all the advices that he offered.<br />

References<br />

1. AGERER R. 2001. Exploration types of ectomycorrhizae. Mycorrhiza, 11: 107-114.<br />

2. ALBERTSEN A., RAVNSKOV S., GREEN H., JENSEN D. F. & LARSEN J. 2006. Interactions between the<br />

external mycelium of the mycorrhizal fungul glomus intraradices and other soil microorganism as<br />

affected by organic matter. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 38: 1008-1014.<br />

3. ANDRADE G., MIHARA K. L., LINDERMAN R. G. & BETHLENFALVAY G. J. 1997. Bacteria from<br />

rhizosphere and hyphosphere soils of different arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi. Plant and Soil, 192: 71-<br />

79.<br />

4. ASPRAY T. J., FREY-KLETT P., JONES J. E., WHIPPS J. M., GARBAYE J. & BENDING G. D. 2006.<br />

Mycorrhization helper bacteria: A case of specificity for altering ectomycorrhiza architecture but not<br />

ectomycorrhiza formation. Mycorrhiza, 16: 533-541.<br />

5. AZCÓN R. 1989. Selective interaction between free-living rhizosphere bacteria and vesicular-arbuscular<br />

mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 21(5): 639-644.<br />

6. AZCÓN-AGUILAR C. & BAREA J. M. 1985. Effect of soil micro-organisms on formation of vesiculararbuscular<br />

mycorrhizae. Trans Br. Mycol. Soc., 84: 536-537.<br />

7. AZCÓN-AGUILAR C. & BAREA J. M. 1997. Applying mycorrhiza biotechnology to horticulture: significance<br />

and potentials. Scientia Horticulturae, 68: 1-24.<br />

8. BAREA J. M, BONIS A. F. & OLIVARES J. 1983. Interactions between Azospirillum and VA mycorrhiza and<br />

their effects on growth and nutrition of maize and ryegrass. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 15(6): 700-<br />

709.


INTERRELATIONS BETWEEN THE MYCORRHIZAL SYSTEMS AND SOIL ORGANISMS<br />

9. BAREA J. M., AZCÓN R. & AZCÓN-AGUILAR C. 2002. Mycorrhizosphere interactions to improve plant<br />

fitness and soil quality. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 81: 343-351.<br />

10. BHARADWAJ D. P., LUNDQUIST P. O. & ALSTRÖM S. 2008. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal spora<br />

associated bacteria affect mycorrhizal colonization, plant growth and potato pathogens. Soil Biology &<br />

Biochemistry, 40: 2494-2501.<br />

11. BIANCIOTTO V. & BONFANTE P. 2002. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: a specialised niche for rhizospheric<br />

and endocellular bacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 81: 365-371.<br />

12. BONKOWSKI M., JENTSCHKE G. & SCHEU S. 2001. Constrasting effects of microbial partners in the<br />

rhizosphere interactions between Norway Spruce seedlings (Picea abies Karst.), mycorrhiza (Paxillus<br />

involutus (Batsch) Fr.) and naked amoebae (protozoa). Applied Soil Ecology, 18: 193-204.<br />

13. BOWEN GD. & THEODOROU C. 1978. Interactions between bacteria and ectomycorrhizal fungi. Soil<br />

Biology and Biochemistry, 11: 119-126.<br />

14. BRULÉ C., FREY-KLETT P., PIERRAT J. C., COURRIER S., GÉRARD F., LEMOINE M. C.,<br />

ROUSSELET J. L., SOMMER G. & GARBAYE J. 2001. Survival in the soil of the ectomycorrizal<br />

fungus Laccaria bicolor and the effects of a mycorrhiza helper Pseudomonas fluorescens. Soil Biology<br />

& Biochemistry, 33: 1683-1694.<br />

15. BUÉE M., DE BOERW., MARTIN F., OVERBEEK L. & JURKEVITCH E. 2009. The rhizosphere zoo: An<br />

overview of plant-associated communities of microorganisms, including phages, bacteria, archaea, and<br />

fungi, and of some of their structuring factors. Plant Soil, 321: 189-212.<br />

16. CALVARUSO C., TURPAULT M. P., LECLERC E. & FREY-KLETT P. 2007. Impact of<br />

Ectomycorrhizosphere on the functional diversity of soil bacterial and fungal communities from a forest<br />

stand in relation to nutrient mobilization processes. Microbial Ecology, 54: 567-577.<br />

17. COMPANT S., DUFFY B., NOWAK J., CLÉMENT C. & BARKA E. A. 2005. Use of plant growthpromoting<br />

bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future<br />

prospects. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71(9): 4951-4959.<br />

18. DUCHESNE L. 1989. Protein synthesis in Pinus resinosa and the ectomycorrhizal fungus Paxillus involutus<br />

prior to ectomycorrhiza formation. Trees, 3: 73-77.<br />

19. DUNSTAN W. A., MALAJCZUK M. & DELL B. 1998. Effects of bacteria on mycorrhizal development and<br />

growth of container grown Eucaliptus diversicolor F. Muell seedlings. Plant and Soil, 201: 241-249.<br />

20. DUPONNOIS R. & PLENCHETTE C. 2003. A mycorrhiza helper bacterium enhances ectomycorrhizal and<br />

endomycorrhizal symbiosis of Australian Acacia species. Mycorrhiza, 13: 85-91.<br />

21. ENE M., ALEXANDRU M., ŞESAN T. E. 2010. Microscopy and detection by PCR (Polymerase chain<br />

reaction): two methods for confirmatory assay on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi infection, în Romanian<br />

approaches in the frame of European research, coordonator Tatiana Eugenia ŞESAN. Edit.<br />

Universităţii din Bucureşti, 83-93.<br />

22. FODOR E. 2010. Includerea ectomicorizelor în reţeaua systemului silvic, în Romanian approaches in the<br />

frame of European research, coordonator Tatiana Eugenia ŞESAN. Edit. Universităţii din Bucureşti,<br />

37-50.<br />

23. FRANCO-CORREA M., QUINTANA A., DUQUE C., SUAREZ C., RODRÍGUEZ M. X. & BAREA J. M.<br />

2010. Evaluation of actinomycete strains for key traits related with plant growth promotion and<br />

mycorrhiza helping activities. Applied Soil Ecology, 45: 209-217.<br />

24. FREY-KLETT P., CHURIN J. L, PIERRAT J. C. & GARBAYE J. 1999. Dose effect in the dual inoculation of<br />

an ectomycorrhizal funguson a mzcorrhiya helper bacterium in two forest nurseries. Soil Biology &<br />

Biochemistry, 31: 1555-1562.<br />

25. GAY G., NORMAND L., MARMEISSE R., SOTTA B. & DEBAUD J. C. 1994. Auxin overproducer mutants<br />

of Hebeloma cylindrosporum have increased mycorrhizal activity. New Phytology, 128: 645-657.<br />

26. GRYNDLER M., HRŠELOV H. & STŘÍTESKÁ D. 2000. Effect of soil bacteria on hyphal growth of the<br />

arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus claroideus. Folia Microbiol., 45(6): 545-551.<br />

27. GUTIÉRREZ-MICELI F.A., MOGUEL-ZAMUDIO B., ABUD-ARCHILA M., GUTIÉREZ-OLIVA V. F. &<br />

DENDOOVEN L. 2008. Sheep manure vermicompost diazotrophic bacteria and mycorrhizae for maize<br />

cultivation. Bioresouces Technology, 99: 7020-7026.<br />

28. HAMEEDA B., SRIJANA M., RUPELA O. P. & REDDY G. 2007 Effect of bacteria isolated from composts<br />

and macrofauna on sorghum growth and mycorrhizal colonization. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 23:<br />

883-887.<br />

29. HAMPP R., WIESE J., MIKOLAJEWSKI S. & NEHLS U. 1999. Biochemical and molecular aspects of C/N<br />

interaction in ectomycorrhizal plants: an update. Plant and Soil, 215: 103-113.<br />

30. HARTMANN A., SCHMID M., TUINEN D. & BERG G. 2009. Plant-driven selection of microbes. Plant<br />

Soil, 321: 235-257.<br />

66


67<br />

BALAEŞ TIBERIUS, TĂNASE CĂTĂLIN<br />

31. HEBE G., HAGER A. & SALZER P. 1999. Initial signalling processes induced by elicitors of ectomycorrhizaforming<br />

fungi in spruce cells can also be triggered by G-protein activating mastoparan and protein<br />

phosphatase-inhibiting cantharidin. Planta, 207: 418-425.<br />

32. HERDLER S., KREUZER K., SCHEU S. & BONKOWSKI M. 2008. Interactions between arbuscular<br />

mycorrhizal fungi (Glomus intraradices, Glomeromycota) and amoebe (Acanthamoeba castellanii,<br />

Protozoa) in the rhizosphere of rice (Oryza sativa). Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 40: 660-668.<br />

33. HRŠELOVÁ H., CHVÁTALOVÁ I., VOSÁTKA M., KLÍR J. & GRYNDLER M. 1999. Correlation of<br />

abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, bacteria and saprophytic microfungi with soil carbon,<br />

nitrogen and phosphorus. Folia Microbiol., 44(6): 683-687.<br />

34. HRYNKIEWICZ K., CIESIELSKA A., HAUG I. & BAUM C. 2010. Ectomycorrhiza formation and willow<br />

growth promotion as affected by associated bacteria: rol of microbial metabolites and use of C sources.<br />

Biol fertil Soils, 46: 139-150.<br />

35. IACOMI B., GEAMĂNU I., COŞOVEANU A. 2010. Micorizele arbusculare – diversitate şi beneficii în<br />

ecosystemele horticole, in ŞESAN T. E. (coord.). Romanian approaches in the frame of European<br />

research. Edit. Universităţii din Bucureşti: 73-82.<br />

36. KATAOKA R. & FUTAI K. 2009. A new mycorrhizal helper bacterium, Ralstonia species, in the<br />

ectomycorrhhizal symbiosis between Pinus thunbergii and Suillus granulatus. Biol fertil Soils, 45: 315-<br />

320.<br />

37. KATAOKA R., TANIGUCHI T. & FUTAI K. 2009. Fungal selectivity of two mycorrhiza helper bacteria on<br />

five mycorrhizal fungi associated with Pinus thunbergii. World Journal of Microbiology on<br />

Biotechnology, 25: 1815-1819.<br />

38. KIM K. Y., JORDAN D. & McDONALD G. A. 1998. Effect of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and vesiculararbuscular<br />

mycorrhizae on tomato growth and soil microbial activity. Biol Fertil Soils, 26: 79-87.<br />

39. KOELE N., TURPAULT M. P., HILDEBRAND E. E., UROZ S. & FREY-KLETT P. 2009. Interactions<br />

between mycorrhizal fungi and mycorrhizosphere bacteria during mineral weathering: Budget analysis<br />

and bacterial quantification. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 41: 1935-1942.<br />

40. KOTHAMASI D., KOTHAMASI S., BHATTACHARYYA A., KUAHD R. C. & BABU C. R. 2006<br />

Arbuscular mycorrhizae and phosphate solubilising bacteria of the rhizosphere of the mangrove<br />

ecosystem of Great Nicobar island, India. Biol Fertil Soils, 42: 358-361.<br />

41. KOZDRÓJ J., PIOTROWSKA-SEGET Z. & KRUPA P. 2007. Mycorrhizal fungi and ectomycorrhiza<br />

associated bacteria isolated from an industrial desert soil protect pine seedlings against Cd(II) impact.<br />

Ecotoxicology, 16: 449-456.<br />

42. LARSEN J., CORNEJO P. & BAREA J. M. 2009. Interactions between yhe arbiscular mycorrhizal fungus<br />

Glomus intraradices on the plant growth promoting rhizobacteria Paenibacillus polymyxa and P.<br />

macerans in the mycorrhizosphere of Cucumis sativus. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 41: 286-292.<br />

43. LI B., RAVNSKOV S., XIE G. & LARSEN J. 2007. Biocontrol of Pythium damping-off in cuccumber by<br />

arbuscular mycorrhiza-associated bacteria from the genus Paenibacillus. BioControl, 52: 863-875.<br />

44. LÓPEZ-GUTIÉRREZ J. C., TORO M. & LÓPEZ-HERNÁNDEZ D. 2004. Arbuscular mycorrhiza and<br />

enzimatic activities in the rhizosphere of Trachypogon plumosus Ness. in three acid savana soils.<br />

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 103: 405-411.<br />

45. MAIER A., RIEDLINGER J., FIEDLER H. P. & HAMPP R. 2004 Actinomycetales bacteria from a spruce<br />

stand: characterization and effects on growth of root symbiotic and plant parasitic soil fungi in dual<br />

culture. Mycological Progress, 3(2): 129-136.<br />

46. MARULANDA A., BAREA J. M. & AZCÓN R. 2006. An indigenous drought-tolerant strain of Glomus<br />

intraradices associated with a native bacterium improves water transport and root development in<br />

Retama sphaerocarpa. Microbial Ecology, 52: 670-678.<br />

47. MCALLISTER C. B., GARCÍA-RORNERA I., GODEA A. & OCAMPO J. A. 1994 Interactions between<br />

Trichoderma koningii, Fusarium solani and Glomus mosseae: effects on plant growth, arbuscular<br />

mycorrhizae and the saprophyte inoculants. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 26(10): 1363-1367.<br />

48. MEYER A., GROTE R., POLLE A. & BUTTERBECH-BAHL K. 2010. Simulating mycorrhizal contribution<br />

to forest C- and N cycling – the MYCOFON model. Plant and Soil, 327: 493-517.<br />

49. MIRANSARI M. 2011. Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soil bacteria. Applied<br />

Microbial Biotechnology, 89: 917-930.<br />

50. MIRANSARI M., BAHRAMI H. A., REJALI F. & MALAKONTI M. J. 2009. Effects of soil compaction and<br />

arbuscular mycorrhiza on corn (Zea mays L.) nutrient uptake. Soil & Tillage Research, 103: 282-290.


INTERRELATIONS BETWEEN THE MYCORRHIZAL SYSTEMS AND SOIL ORGANISMS<br />

51. NEERAJ & SINGH K. 2010. Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhiza and<br />

Pseudomonas fluorescens and treated with mustard oil cake overcome Macrophomina root-rot losses.<br />

Biol Fertil Soils, 46: 237-245.<br />

52. NEHLS U., BÉGUIRISTAIN T., DITENGOU F., LAPEYRIE F. & MARTIN F. 1998. The expression of a<br />

symbiosis-regulated gene in eucalypt roots is regulated by auxins an hypaphorine, the triptotaphan<br />

betaine of ectomycorrhizal basidiomycete Pisolithus tinctorius. Planta, 207: 296-302.<br />

53. OANCEA F., CONSTANTINESCU F., ŞESAN T. E., DINU S., SICUIA O. 2010. Efectele systemului de<br />

agricultură conservativă cu mulci bioactiv asupra agregatelor stabile în apă, a propagulelor micoriziale<br />

şi a glomalinei dintr-un cernoziom cambic, în volumul Romanian approaches in the frame of European<br />

research, coordonator Tatiana Eugenia ŞESAN. Edit. Universităţii din Bucureşti: 94-106.<br />

54. PIVATO B., OFFRE P., MARCHELLI S., BARBOBAGLIA B., MUOGEL C., LEMANCEAU P. & BERTA<br />

G. 2009. Bacterial effects on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and mycorrhiza development as influenced<br />

by the bacteria, fungi, and host plant. Mycorrhiza, 19: 81-90.<br />

55. RAIESI F. & GHOLLARATA M. 2006. Interactions between phosphorus availability and an AM fungus<br />

(Glomus intraradices) and their effects on soil microbial respirations, biomass and enzyme activities in<br />

a calcareous soil. Pedobiologia, 50: 413-425.<br />

56. REQUENA N., SERRANO E., OCÓN A. & BREUNINGER M. 2007. Plant signal and fungal perception<br />

during arbuscular mycorrhiza establishment. Phytochemistry, 68: 33-40.<br />

57. RØNN R., GAVITO M., LARSEN J., JAKOBSEN I., FREDERIKSEN H. & CHRISTENSEN S. 2002.<br />

Response of free-living soil protozoa and microorganisms to elevated atmospheric CO2 and presesnce<br />

of mycorrhiza. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 34: 923-932.<br />

58. RUIZ-LOZANO J. M. & BONFANTE P. 2001. Intracellular Burkholderia strain has no negative effect on the<br />

symbiotic efficiency of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Gigaspora margarita. Plant Growth<br />

Regulation, 34: 347-352.<br />

59. SCHELKLE M. & PETERSON R. L. 1996. Supression of comon root pathogens by helper bacteria and<br />

ectomycorrhizal fungi in vitro. Mycorrhiza, 6: 481-485.<br />

60. SCHREY S. D., SALO V., RAUDASKOSKI M., HAMPP R., NEHLS U. & TARKKA M. T. 2007.<br />

Interactions with mycorrhiza helper bacterium Streptomyces sp. AcH505 modifies organisation of actin<br />

cytoskeleton in the ectomycorrhizal fungus Amanita muscaria (fly agaric). Current genetics, 52: 77-85.<br />

61. ŞESAN T. E., OANCEA F., TOMA C., MATEI G. M., MATEI S., CHIRA F., FODOR E., MOCAN C., ENE<br />

M. & ALEXANDRU M. 2010. Approaches to the study of mycorrhizae in Romania. Symbiosis, 52(2-<br />

3): 75-85.<br />

62. SIVIERO M. A., MOTTA A. M., SANTOS LIMA D., BIROLLI R. R., HUH S. Y., SANTIONI I. A.,<br />

MURATE L. S., AANTONIA DE CASTRO C. M., MIYOUCHI M. Y. H., ZABGARO W.,<br />

NOGEUIRA M. A. & ANDRADE G. 2008. Interaction among N-fixing bacteria and AM fungi in<br />

Amazonian legume tree (Schyzolobium amazonicum). Applied Soil Ecology, 39: 144-152.<br />

63. TALBOT J. M. & TRESEDER K. K. 2009. Control over mycorrhizal uptake of organic nitrogen. Plant and<br />

Soil, 303: 87-89.<br />

64. TARKKA M. T., SARNIGUET A. & FREY-KLETT P. 2009. Inter-kingdom encounters: recent advances in<br />

molecular bacterium–fungus interactions. Curr Genet, 55: 233-243.<br />

65. TIAN C., HE X., ZHONG Y. & CHEN J. 2003. Effect of inoculation with ecto- and arbuscular mycorrhizae<br />

and Rhizobium on the growth and nitrogen fixation by black locust, Robinia pseudoacacia. New<br />

Forests, 25: 125-131.<br />

66. TIMONEN S., SÖDERSTRÖM B. & RAUDASKOSKI M. 1996. Dynamics of cytoskeletal proteins in<br />

developing pine ectomycorrhiza. Mycorrhiza, 6: 423-429.<br />

67. TIUNOV A. V. & SCHEU S. 2005. Arbuscular mycorrhiza and Collembola interact in affecting community<br />

composition of saprotrophic microfungi. Oecologia, 142: 636-642.<br />

68. TOBAR R. M., AZCÓN-AGUILAR C., SANJUÁN J. & BAREA J. M. 1996. Impact of a genetically<br />

modified Rhizobium strain with improved nodulation competitiveness on the early stages of arbuscular<br />

mycorrhiza formation. Applied Soil Ecology, 4: 15-21.<br />

69. VIVAS A., MARULANDA A., GÓMEZ M., BAREA J. M. & AZCÓN R. 2003. Physiological characteristics<br />

(SDH and ALP activities) of arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization as affected by Bacillus thuringiensis<br />

inoculation under two phosphorus levels. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 35: 987-996.<br />

70. WEHNER J., ANTUNES P. M., POWELL J. R., MAZUKATOW J. & RILLIG M. C. 2010. Plant pathogen<br />

protection by arbuscular mycorrhizae: A role for fungal diversity?. Pedobiologia, 53: 197-201.<br />

71. WELSH A. K., BURKE D. J., HAMERLYNCK E. P. & HAHN D. 2010. Seasonal analyses of arbuscular<br />

mycorrhizae, nitrogen-fixing bacteria and growth performance of the salt marsh grass Spartina patens.<br />

Plant Soil, 330: 251-266.<br />

68


69<br />

BALAEŞ TIBERIUS, TĂNASE CĂTĂLIN<br />

72. XIAO X., CHEN H., CHEN H., WANG J., REN C. & WU L. 2008. Impact of Bacillus subtilis JA, a<br />

biocontrol strain of fungal plant pathogens, on arbuscular mycorrhiza formation in Zea mays. World J<br />

Microbiol Biotechnol, 24: 1133-1137.<br />

73. ZAMFIRACHE M.-M. & TOMA C. 2000. Simbioza în lumea vie. Iaşi: Edit. Univ. ”Alexandru Ioan Cuza”,<br />

186-239.<br />

74. ZAREA M. J., GHALAVAND A., GOLTAPEH E.M., REJALI F. & ZAMANIYAD M. 2009. Effect of mixed<br />

cropping, earthworms (Phereina sp.), and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomus mosseae) on plant<br />

yield, mycorrhizal colonozation rate, soil microbial biomass, and nitrogenase. Pedobiology, 52: 223-<br />

235.<br />

75. ZARNEA G. 1994. Tratat de microbiologie generală. Bucureşti: Edit. Academiei Române, 5: 367-391.<br />

76. ZUBEK S., TURNAU K., TSIMILLI-MICHAEL M. & STRASSER R. J. 2009. Response of endangered plant<br />

species to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soil bacteria. Mycorrhiza, 19: 113-123.


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 71-80<br />

71<br />

SHARDA W. KHADE<br />

NEW CHARACTERISTICS FOR MORPHOTAXONOMY OF<br />

GIGASPORA SPECIES BELONGING TO ARBUSCULAR<br />

MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI<br />

SHARDA W. KHADE 1<br />

Abstract: New characteristics for morpho-taxonomy were devised to support the species concept in genus<br />

Gigaspora belonging to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Three species viz. G. margarita, G. decipiens<br />

and unidentified Gigaspora sp. were studied for various characters viz. bulbous suspensor,<br />

sporophore, germ tube, presence of septum and presence or absence connecticle. The term<br />

“Connecticle” is newly introduced and is a region present between the base of bulbous suspensor and<br />

septum overlying the sporophore. The term “Germ pore” is also newly introduced. The present study<br />

reported that germ tube in Gigaspora is always attached to the spore through a pore which is now<br />

named as germ pore. In all, eight types of subtending hypha were recorded during the present study<br />

with variations in shape of bulbous suspensor and sporophore along with presence or absence<br />

connecticle. Presence of germ pore, septum and germ tube was common feature in Gigaspora species<br />

undertaken for the study. The location of septum was another new character devised for taxonomy in<br />

the present study. Thus the present study upholds the species concept in Gigaspora based on morphotaxonomy.<br />

Key words: arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, bulbous suspensor, connecticle, germ pore, germ tube, G. margarita,<br />

G. decipiens, morpho-taxonomy, septum, sporophore, unidentified Gigaspora sp.<br />

Introduction<br />

Traditionally, Glomeromycotan taxonomy of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal<br />

group has been based on the morphology of the spores. The way the spore is formed on the<br />

hypha (“mode of spore formation”) has been important to circumscribe genera and families,<br />

and the layered structure of the spore wall is used to distinguish species [WALKER, 1983;<br />

MORTON, 1988]. Glomeromycotan taxonomy is relatively young. Among the<br />

glomeromycotan fungi, the Gigasporaceae (Scutellospora and Gigaspora) members are<br />

distinguished by the formation of their spores on a “bulbous suspensor” and are well<br />

supported by molecular data. Recently, OEHL & al. (2008) revised family Gigasporaceae<br />

on the basis of morphological spore characters and 18S and 25S rRNA gene sequences. In<br />

the family Gigasporaceae, 36 Scutellospora species were reorganized in three new families<br />

including five new genera: Scutellosporaceae (Scutellospora), Racocetraceae (Racocetra,<br />

Cetraspora) and Dentiscutataceae (Dentiscutata, Fuscutata, Quatunica). The family<br />

Gigasporaceae now remains with a single genus Gigaspora.<br />

The group Gigaspora is the smallest group since member species were transferred<br />

into erected Scutellospora Walkers & Sanders primarily on the basis of presence of subcellular<br />

structures associated with germination [WALKERS & SANDERS, 1986]. With<br />

this, species level differences in Gigaspora rested upon seemingly small morphological<br />

differences in spore colour, size and wall thickness [BENTIVENGA & MORTON, 1995].<br />

1 Goa University, Department of Botany, Taleigao Plateau, GOA-403206, India.<br />

e-mail: shardakhade12@rediffmail.com


NEW CHARACTERISTICS FOR MORPHOTAXONOMY OF GIGASPORA SPECIES BELONGING …<br />

Gigaspora posses a problem since spore of all species differentiate only a spore wall and<br />

diverge in characteristics of that spore wall [BENTIVENGA & MORTON, 1995]. Research<br />

workers questioned the fact that, do small morphological differences within the genus<br />

constitute adequate criteria for delimitation of species? Advanced studies in taxonomy viz.<br />

ontogeny define relationships between the characters while a phylogenetic study provides<br />

information on relationship between Gigaspora and other fungi in Glomeromycota<br />

[BENTIVENGA & MORTON, 1995]. Thus the validity and importance of morphological<br />

characters in establishing taxonomic species are of considerable importance to construct<br />

workable system of identification. In view of the above, the present paper throws light on<br />

new characteristics to be incorporated to boost the traditional morpho-taxonomy in<br />

Gigaspora species.<br />

Material and methods<br />

Extraction of AM fungal spores. Spores of AM fungi associated with Carica<br />

papaya L. plants from Goa, India were isolated directly from rhizosphere soil samples by<br />

wet sieving and decanting method [GERDEMANN & NICOLSON, 1963]. All the<br />

available healthy turgid spores were isolated from the rhizosphere soil. Repeated sampling<br />

were carried out in monsoons (rainy season) when the spores sporulated newly in the soil.<br />

The host plant was same for all the samplings. This plant was grown in monoculture and<br />

mulching practices carried out in the field and because of this there were no weeds.<br />

Therefore the samplings were carried out under same environmental conditions and from<br />

the rhizosphere soil of the replicates of single host plant viz. papaya.<br />

Identification of AM fungi. Diagnostic slides containing intact and crushed spores<br />

of AM fungi were prepared in polyvinyl alcohol lactoglycerol [KOSKE & TESSIER,<br />

1983]. Spore morphology and wall characteristics were considered for the identification of<br />

AM fungi and these characteristics were ascertained using compound microscope, Leica<br />

WILD MP 3 and Nikon E 800. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi were identified to species<br />

level using bibliographies provided by SCHENCK & PEREZ (1990), SCHÜßLER & al.<br />

(2001) and OEHL & al. (2008).<br />

Results<br />

The genus Gigaspora consists of azygospore with subtending hyphae. This hypha<br />

is attached to spore through a pore (Fig. 1). The subtending hypha consists of terminal<br />

swollen sporogenous cell called bulbous suspensor and sporogenous hypha called<br />

sporophore (Fig. 1). A septum is present at the base of the swollen portion separating the<br />

bulbous suspensor from the sporophore (Fig. 1). In some cases, the subtending hypha at the<br />

base of the bulbous suspensor metamorphoses to produce various shaped structure. This<br />

part of the subtending hypha connecting the bulbous suspensor to the sporophore which is<br />

overlined by the presence septum is called a connecticle (Fig. 1). In the present study, the<br />

type of bulbous suspensor, sporophore and connecticle varied in Gigaspora species.<br />

In all, eight types of subtending hypha were recorded during the present study<br />

(Table 1); (Fig. 2). 1) thin walled clavate bulbous suspensor with funnel shaped sporophore<br />

(Fig. 2a), 2) thin walled clavate bulbous suspensor with straight sporophore (Fig. 2b), 3)<br />

thick walled clavate bulbous suspensor with recurved sporophore (Fig. 2c), 4) thin walled<br />

clavate bulbous suspensor with recurved sporophore (Fig. 2d), 5) subglobose bulbous<br />

72


73<br />

SHARDA W. KHADE<br />

suspensor with funnel shaped sporophore (Fig. 2e), 6) globose bulbous suspensor with<br />

funnel shaped connecticle and curved sporophore (Fig. 2f), 7) globose bulbous suspensor<br />

with vase shaped connecticle and curved sporophore (Fig. 2g), 8) globose bulbous<br />

suspensor with elongated connecticle and curved sporophore (Fig. 2h).<br />

Fig. 1. Diagrammatic representation of characteristics of subtending hypha in Gigaspora species.<br />

Fig. 2. Diagrammatic representation of variations in subtending hyphae of Gigaspora species.<br />

a) Thin walled clavate bulbous suspensor with funnel shaped sporophore.<br />

b) Thin walled clavate bulbous suspensor with straight sporophore.<br />

c) Thick walled clavate bulbous suspensor with recurved sporophore.<br />

d) Thin walled clavate bulbous suspensor with recurved sporophore.<br />

e) Sub-globose bulbous suspensor with funnel shaped sporophore.<br />

f) Globose bulbous suspensor with funnel shaped connecticle and curved sporophore.<br />

g) Globose bulbous suspensor with vase shaped connecticle and curved sporophore.<br />

h) Globose bulbous suspensor with elongated connecticle and curved sporophore.


NEW CHARACTERISTICS FOR MORPHOTAXONOMY OF GIGASPORA SPECIES BELONGING …<br />

Tab. 1. Characteristics of subtending hypha in Gigaspora species<br />

Location<br />

of septum<br />

Pore<br />

Sporophore<br />

(Sp)<br />

30µm wide at the base of<br />

Bs; 15–20µm wide, away<br />

from the base of Bs<br />

30–40µm wide at the base<br />

of Bs; 15–20µm wide, away<br />

from the base of Bs<br />

30–60µm wide at the base<br />

of Bs; 20–30µm wide, away<br />

from the base of Bs<br />

30–50µm wide at the base<br />

of Bs; 20–30µm wide, away<br />

from the base of Bs<br />

Connecticle<br />

Bulbous suspensor<br />

(Bs)<br />

40–70 µm wide; 50–320<br />

µm long; 2–10µm thick<br />

wall<br />

80–200 µm wide; 170–<br />

350 µm long; 2–10µm<br />

thick wall<br />

200–350 µm wide; 270–<br />

400 µm long; 20–65µm<br />

thick wall<br />

Occurrence<br />

in<br />

Present At the base of Bs<br />

Absent<br />

G. margarita<br />

*Type of subtending<br />

hypha<br />

Thin walled clavate Bs with<br />

funnel shaped Sp (Fig. 2a,<br />

Fig. 3)<br />

Present At the base of Bs<br />

Absent<br />

G. decipiens<br />

Thin walled clavate Bs with<br />

straight Sp (Fig. 2b, Fig. 8)<br />

Present At the base of Bs<br />

Absent<br />

G. decipiens<br />

Thick walled clavate Bs<br />

with recurved Sp<br />

Present At the base of Bs<br />

Absent<br />

150–250 µm wide; 180–<br />

300 µm long; 2–10µm<br />

thick wall<br />

Unidentified<br />

Gigaspora<br />

species<br />

(Fig. 2c, Fig. 9)<br />

Thin walled clavate Bs with<br />

recurved Sp<br />

(Fig. 2d, Fig. 10)<br />

Present At the base of Bs<br />

100–50 µm wide at the base<br />

of Bs; 20–40 µm wide,<br />

away from the base of Bs<br />

Absent<br />

60–150 µm wide; 80–300<br />

µm long; 20–50µm long<br />

lateral hypha; 2–10µm<br />

thick wall<br />

G. margarita<br />

Subglobose Bs with funnel<br />

shaped Sp<br />

(Fig. 2e, Fig. 4)<br />

At the end of<br />

connecticle<br />

20–30µm wide Present<br />

40–60 µm wide at the base of Bs;<br />

20–30µm near septum 250–320 µm<br />

60–140 µm diam. 2–10µm<br />

thick wall<br />

G. margarita<br />

Globose Bs with funnel<br />

shaped connecticle and<br />

At the end of<br />

connecticle<br />

Present<br />

20–30µm wide<br />

long<br />

30–40 µm wide at the base of Bs,<br />

inflated at the centre, 40–60 µm<br />

wide, narrow near septum, 20–30<br />

µm wide; 200–350 µm long<br />

Constricted at the base, 30–40 µm<br />

wide, swollen below, 50–80µm<br />

wide, below the swollen portion<br />

straight 40–60 µm wide; 350–500<br />

µm long<br />

60–130 µm diam. 2–10µm<br />

thick wall<br />

G. margarita<br />

curved Sp (Fig. 2f, Fig. 5)<br />

Globose Bs with vase<br />

shaped connecticle and<br />

curved Sp (Fig. 2g, Fig. 6)<br />

At the end of<br />

connecticle<br />

Present<br />

30–40µm wide<br />

60–250 µm diam. 2–10µm<br />

thick wall<br />

G. margarita<br />

Globose Bs with elongated<br />

connecticle and curved Sp<br />

(Fig. 2h, Fig.7)<br />

*Bs = Bulbous suspensor; *Sp = Sporophore<br />

74


75<br />

SHARDA W. KHADE<br />

Three species of Gigaspora with eight types of subtending hypha were recorded<br />

during the present study (Tab. 1); (Fig. 3 – Fig. 10). In G. margarita Becker & Hall, five<br />

types of subtending hypha were observed viz. thin walled clavate bulbous suspensor with<br />

funnel shaped sporophore (Fig. 3), subglobose bulbous suspensor with funnel shaped<br />

sporophore (Fig. 4), globose bulbous suspensor with funnel shaped connecticle and curved<br />

sporophore (Fig. 5), globose bulbous suspensor with vase shaped connecticle and curved<br />

sporophore (Fig. 6) and globose bulbous suspensor with elongated connecticle and curved<br />

sporophore (Fig. 7). In G. decipiens Hall & Abbott, two types of subtending hyphae were<br />

observed viz. thin walled clavate bulbous suspensor with straight sporophore (Fig. 8) and<br />

thick walled clavate bulbous suspensor with recurved sporophore (Fig. 9). In unidentified<br />

Gigaspora species, one type of subtending hypha was observed viz. thin walled clavate<br />

bulbous suspensor with recurved sporophore (Fig. 10).<br />

Types of subtending hypha in Gigaspora margarita<br />

Fig. 3. Thin walled clavate bulbous<br />

suspensor with funnel shaped sporophore<br />

(Bar = 30μm).<br />

Fig. 4. Sub-globose bulbous suspensor<br />

with funnel shaped sporophore<br />

(Bar = 20μm).


NEW CHARACTERISTICS FOR MORPHOTAXONOMY OF GIGASPORA SPECIES BELONGING …<br />

Fig. 5. Globose bulbous<br />

suspensor with funnel shaped<br />

connecticle and curved<br />

sporophore (Bar = 100μm).<br />

Types of subtending hypha in Gigaspora margarita<br />

Fig. 6. Globose bulbous<br />

suspensor with vase shaped<br />

connecticle and curved<br />

sporophore (Bar = 100μm).<br />

[* Note the presence of pore (arrow) in Fig. 5-7]<br />

Fig. 8. Thin walled clavate<br />

bulbous suspensor with<br />

straight sporophore in<br />

Gigaspora decipiens<br />

(Bar = 20μm).<br />

Types of subtending hypha in Gigaspora species<br />

Fig. 9. Thick walled<br />

clavate bulbous suspensor<br />

with recurved sporophore<br />

in Gigaspora decipiens<br />

(Bar = 100μm).<br />

76<br />

Fig. 7. Globose bulbous<br />

suspensor with elongated<br />

connecticle and curved<br />

sporophore (Bar = 50 μm).<br />

Fig. 10. Thin walled clavate<br />

bulbous suspensor with<br />

recurved sporophore in<br />

unidentified Gigaspora sp.<br />

(Bar = 100μm).


77<br />

SHARDA W. KHADE<br />

In Gigaspora the innermost wall known as the germinal wall in the close<br />

proximity of bulbous suspensor, produces germ tube at the time of spore germination. This<br />

germ tube is attached to the spore through germ pore (Fig. 11-14). No variation was<br />

observed in the type of germ pore. However, in the present study the type of germ tube<br />

varied in different Gigaspora species. In G. margarita, numerous “warts” or “papillae”<br />

were present on the inner surface of germinal layer and they were especially concentrated<br />

in regions where germ tube originated (in close proximity to the suspensor cell) (Fig. 7, Fig.<br />

11). In this species, the germ tube was curved and germ pore was present at the point of<br />

attachment to the spore wall (Fig. 11). In G. decipiens, the warts were absent on the<br />

germinal wall in the vicinity of bulbous suspensor and here the germ tube was straight and<br />

attached to the spore through germ pore (Fig. 12). In unidentified Gigaspora sp., the<br />

germinal wall produced several centimeters long coiled germ tube with presence of germ<br />

pore at the point of attachment to the spore wall (Fig. 13, Fig. 14).<br />

Fig. 11. Curved germ tube in<br />

Gigaspora margarita (Bar = 25μm)<br />

Germ tubes in Gigaspora species<br />

Fig. 12. Straight germ tube in<br />

Gigaspora decipiens (Bar = 25μm)


NEW CHARACTERISTICS FOR MORPHOTAXONOMY OF GIGASPORA SPECIES BELONGING …<br />

Fig. 13. Coiled germ tube in unidentified<br />

Gigaspora sp. (Bar = 100μm).<br />

[* Note the presence of Germ pore (arrow) in Fig. 11-14]<br />

Discussions<br />

Now, the phylum Glomeromycota comprises about 200 described morpho-species<br />

that traditionally have been distinguished by features of the spore wall. WALKER (1983)<br />

established the concept of “murographs” to describe and compare the layered structure of<br />

the spore walls more easily. MORTON (1995) and STÜRMER & MORTON (1997) and<br />

STÜRMER & MORTON (1999) included considerations of the spore development to<br />

group these wall components hierarchically<br />

78<br />

Fig. 14. Coiled germ tube in unidentified<br />

Gigaspora sp. (Bar = 50μm)<br />

into complexes linked by ontogeny<br />

[REDECKER & RAAB, 2006]. Therefore in the present study various characteristics of<br />

spore especially the spore attachment of Gigaspora viz. bulbous suspensor and sporophore<br />

was studied in detail to support the species concept.<br />

Till date, eight species exists under genus Gigaspora of the family Gigasporaceae.<br />

They are as follows: G. albida Schenck & Smith, G. alboaurantiaca Chou, G. candida<br />

Bhattacharjee, Mukerji, Tewarii & Skoropad, G. decipiens Hall & Abbott, G. gigantea<br />

(Nicol. & Gerd.) Gerd. & Trappe, G. margarita Becker & Hall, G. ramisporophora Spain,<br />

Sieverding & Schenck, G. rosea Nicol. & Schenck [OEHL & al. 2008]. The synonymy of<br />

G. ramisporophora with G. margarita [BENTIVENGA & MORTON, 1995] is not<br />

accepted based on molecular [DE SOUZA & al. 2004] and morphological [SPAIN & al.<br />

1989] differences. Gigaspora rosea and G. candida are also treated as separate species.<br />

Gigaspora tuberculata Neeraj, Mukerji, Sharma & Varma earlier reported under genus<br />

Gigaspora [SCHENCK & PEREZ, 1990] was later reported as synonym of Scutellospora<br />

persica (Koske & Walker) Walker & Sanders [BENTIVENGA & MORTON, 1995].<br />

It is reported that spore size and colour are stable distinct characters to support<br />

species concept in Gigaspora [BENTIVENGA & MORTON, 1995]. In contrast to this,


79<br />

SHARDA W. KHADE<br />

development of spore with two permanent layers is shared with all Gigasporaceae<br />

members. Also the variation of spores in Gigaspora is more limited than Scutellospora that<br />

exhibit wide range in colour and are often ornamented. This is due to strong genetic and<br />

developmental constraints which appear to limit the expression of variation in Gigaspora<br />

[BENTIVENGA & MORTON, 1995]. However, in the present study large variation was<br />

seen in the subtending hypha of Gigaspora species. Five different types of subtending<br />

hypha were recorded in G. margarita. The species recorded three different types of bulbous<br />

suspensor viz. clavate, subglobose and globose. The connecticle were of three types viz.<br />

funnel shaped, vase shaped and elongated while the sporophores were also of three types<br />

viz. straight, funnel shaped and curved. Lateral hyphal projection was present in subglobose<br />

bulbous suspensor. In G. decipiens, the bulbous suspensor was clavate and of two types,<br />

thin walled and thick walled. Here the sporophores were also of two types, straight and<br />

recurved. In unidentified species of Gigaspora, the bulbous suspensor was clavate with<br />

recurved sporophore.<br />

Another keen observation recorded in the present study was that septum delimiting<br />

the bulbous suspensor from the sporophore was present immediately at the base of all clavate<br />

bulbous suspensors and even at the base of subglobose bulbous suspensor of Gigaspora<br />

species. However, at the base of all globose bulbous suspensors, connecticles were present<br />

followed by septum delimiting the sporophore from it. These connecticles varied in shape and<br />

size and were associated only with globose bulbous suspensors of G. margarita.<br />

In Gigaspora species, a vital life history function is germination of spore. This<br />

germination of spore is always associated with the spore wall [BENTIVENGA & MORTON,<br />

1995]. The present study upholds the view of several workers [MAIA & al. 1993; SWARD,<br />

1978; SWARD, 1981] who reported that germination takes place through the formation of<br />

germ tube which always arises from inner papillate layer and pushes through the spore wall.<br />

However, the present study brought out the fact that its development is like that of bulbous<br />

suspensor which is attached to the spore through a pore and in case of germ tube the pore is<br />

designated as germ pore. No feature of this germ pore, described in the present study,<br />

distinguishes any of the Gigaspora species compared in this study. However, through the<br />

present study, it is confirmed the germ tube is always associated with germ pore. Further, in<br />

the present study, the type of germ tube varied within the species of Gigaspora. It was curved<br />

in G. margarita, straight in G. decipiens and coiled in unidentified Gigaspora species.<br />

Presence of germ pore was recorded in all the three species.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Glomeromycotan fungi are of great interest to ecologists because of its potential<br />

influence on ecosystem processes, its role in determining plant diversity in natural<br />

communities and the ability of the fungi to induce a wide variety of growth responses in<br />

coexisting plant species. Difficulties in identification, the inability to grow the fungi in pure<br />

culture, problems of taxonomic classification and a lack of basic information on the life<br />

histories of AM fungi hinder studies of the ecological significance of diversity of AM<br />

fungi. Nucleic acid based techniques have the potential to fill this gap in our knowledge by<br />

offering better means of identification and the opportunity to study links between the<br />

genetic diversity of AM fungi and functional and morphological diversity. The application<br />

of genus specific molecular markers has shown that different genera of AM fungi coexist in<br />

plant roots and that this is a common occurrence [SANDERS & al. 1996]. However the<br />

speciation concept still rests on the morpho-taxonomy of the spore. In Gigaspora, where<br />

there are relatively few species with small number of taxonomic characters, the present<br />

paper gives additional information on characters of taxonomic relevance.


NEW CHARACTERISTICS FOR MORPHOTAXONOMY OF GIGASPORA SPECIES BELONGING …<br />

New characters viz. bulbous suspensor, sporophore, germ tube, presence of<br />

septum and presence or absence connecticle are incorporated to differentiate Gigaspora<br />

members to species level. Even presence or absence of septum at the base of bulbous<br />

suspensor or the distance at which it is present from the base of bulbous suspensor is<br />

another distinguishing character. Further, the presence or absence of connecticle in<br />

Gigaspora species is newly introduced to carry out taxonomic studies. Additionally, the<br />

term germ pore used to designate the point of attachment of germ tube to the spore is also<br />

introduced for taxonomy of Gigaspora species. Further, my study contradicts the earlier<br />

reports that variations in Gigaspora are limited. My study brings out the facts that even the<br />

isolates of same species which was earlier distinguished on the basis of spore size and<br />

colour show large variations in the morphology of its subtending hypha and this aspect is<br />

newly studied in detail and documented in the present study.<br />

References<br />

1. BENTIVENGA S. P. & MORTON J. B. 1995. A monograph of the genus Gigaspora incorporating<br />

developmental patterns of morphological characters. Mycologia, 87(5): 719-731.<br />

2. DE SOUZA F. A., KOWALCHUK G. A., LEEFLANG P., VAN VEEN J. A. & SMIT E. 2004. PCG<br />

denaturating gradient gel electrophoresis profiling of the inter and intraspecific 18S rRNA gene<br />

sequence heterogeneity is an accurate and sensitive method to assess species diversity of arbuscular<br />

mycorrhizal fungi of the genus Gigaspora. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 70: 1413-1414.<br />

3. GERDEMANN J. W. & NICOLSON T. H. 1963. Spores of mycorrhizal Endogone species extracted from soil<br />

wet sieving and decanting. Transactions of British Mycological Society, 46: 235-244.<br />

4. KOSKE R. E. & TESSIER B. 1983. A convenient permanent slide mounting medium. Mycological Society<br />

American Newsletter, 34: 59.<br />

5. MAIA L., KIMBROUGH J. W. & BENNY G. 1993. Ultrastructural studies of the spore wall of Gigaspora<br />

albida (Glomales). Mycologia, 85: 883-889.<br />

6. MORTON J. B. 1988. Taxonomy of VA mycorrhizal fungi: Classification, nomenclature, and identification.<br />

Mycotaxon, 32: 267-324.<br />

7. MORTON J. B. 1995. Taxonomic and phylogenetic divergence among five Scutellospora species based on<br />

comparative developmental sequences. Mycologia, 87: 127-137.<br />

8. OEHL F., DE SOUZA F. A. & SIEVERDING E. 2008. Revision of Scutellospora and description of five new<br />

genera and three new families in the arbuscular mycorrhiza-forming Glomeromycetes. Mycotaxon, 106:<br />

311-360.<br />

9. REDECKER D. & RAAB P. 2006. Phylogeny of the Glomeromycota (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi): Recent<br />

developments and new gene markers. Mycologia, 98(6): 885-895.<br />

10. SANDERS I. R., CLAPP J. P. & WIEMKEN A. 1996. The genetic diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi<br />

in natural ecosystems: a key to understanding the ecology and functioning of the mycorrhizal<br />

symbiosis. New Phytologist, 133(1): 123-134.<br />

11. SCHENCK N. C. & PEREZ Y. (eds.) 1990. Manual for identification of VA Mycorrhizal fungi. University of<br />

Florida, Gainesville. USA, 214 pp.<br />

12. SCHÜßLER A., SCHWARZOTT D. & WALKER C. 2001. A new fungal phylum, the Glomeromycota:<br />

phylogeny and evolution. Mycological Research, 105: 1413-1421.<br />

13. SPAIN J. L., SIEVERDING E. & SCHENCK N. C. 1989. Gigaspora ramisporophora: a new species with<br />

novel sporophores from Brazil. Mycotaxon, 34: 667-677.<br />

14. STÜRMER S. L. & MORTON J. B. 1997. Developmental patterns defining morphological characters in<br />

spores of four species in Glomus. Mycologia, 89: 72-81.<br />

15. STÜRMER S. L. & MORTON J. B. 1999. Taxonomic reinterpretation of morphological characters in<br />

Acaulosporaceae based on developmental patterns. Mycologia, 91: 849-857.<br />

16. SWARD R. J. 1978. Infection of Australian heath land plants by Gigaspora margarita (a vesicular arbuscular<br />

mycorrhizal fungus). Australian Journal of Botany, 26: 253-264.<br />

17. SWARD R. J. 1981. The structure of the spores of Gigaspora margarita. III. Germ tube emergence and<br />

growth. New Phytologist, 88: 667-674.<br />

18. WALKER C. 1983. Taxonomic concepts in the Endogonaceae: spore wall characteristics in species<br />

descriptions. Mycotaxon, 18: 443-455.<br />

19. WALKER C. & SANDERS F. E. 1986. Taxonomic concepts in the Endogonaceae: III. The separation of<br />

Scutellospora gen. nov. from Gigaspora Gerd. & Trappe. Mycotaxon, 27: 169-182.<br />

80


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 81-86<br />

MANOLIU ALEXANDRU, IRIMIA ROMEO, MIRCEA CORNELIA, ŞPAC ADRIAN<br />

COMPOSITION OF THE VOLATILE OIL EXTRACTED FROM<br />

ABIES ALBA MILLER LEAVES PARASITIZED BY<br />

MELAMPSORELLA CARYOPHYLLACEARUM (DC.) J. SCHRÖT.<br />

MANOLIU ALEXANDRU 1 , IRIMIA ROMEO 1 ,<br />

MIRCEA CORNELIA 2 , ŞPAC ADRIAN 2<br />

Abstract: Researches results highlights both qualitative and quantitative influences exercised by the parasitic<br />

species Melampsorella caryophyllacearum on the composition of the volatile oil extracted from<br />

Abies alba leaves, prelevated in 2010 from Oituz river basin (Bacău county). The isolation of<br />

volatile oils has been realized by hydrodistillation in Neo-Clavenger installation, followed by gaschromatography<br />

coupled with mass spectrometry analysis. The increase of the monoterpenes<br />

concentration in the parasitized sample could be explained by the degradative action of the enzymes<br />

produced by the pathogenic species Melampsorella caryophyllacearum or by the incapacity of<br />

syntheses from these monoterpenes of some compounds presenting a more complex structure in the<br />

parasitized plant case.<br />

Keywords: volatile oil, monoterpenes, sescviterpenes, Abies alba, Melampsorella caryophyllacearum<br />

Introduction<br />

The decline of Abies alba Mill. has been the subject of great concern in Central<br />

Europe and North America since the early 1970s [SKELLY & INNES, 1994]. Among the<br />

main proposed causes of fir decline were air pollutants, climatic and biotic factors. The use<br />

of dendro-ecological techniques has enabled researchers to date with annual resolution, and<br />

to quantify precisely the effects of fungal pathogens on radial growth [CHERUBINI & al.<br />

2002].<br />

The fungus Melampsorella caryophyllacearum (DC.) J. Schröt. (Fungi,<br />

Basidiomycota) also called fir broom rust, has been reported to cause serious damage on<br />

Abies species [NICOLOTTI & al. 1995; MANOLIU & al. 2009]. The fungus causes the<br />

production by the tree of witches’ brooms, and hypertrophied ring growths on the trunk or<br />

branches resulting in spherical swellings [SOLLA & al. 2006]. Of greater concern, M.<br />

caryophyllacearum may contribute to a tree’s death by weakening it such that wind breaks<br />

the tree at the site of the swelling.<br />

The disease is common wherever firs grow, being present in North America<br />

[MERRILL Z & al. 1993], Europe [FRIGIMELICA & al. 2001], and Asia [ALEKSEEV &<br />

al. 1999].<br />

1 “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University, Biology of Faculty, bd. Carol I, 20A, 700505, Iaşi - Romania<br />

2 “Gr. T. Popa” Medecine and Pharmacy University, Pharmacy Faculty, st. University, 16, 700115, Iaşi - Romania<br />

81


COMPOSITION OF THE VOLATILE OIL EXTRACTED FROM ABIES ALBA MILLER LEAVES...<br />

Material and methods<br />

Identification and quantification of volatile oil [ŞTEFĂNESCU, 1988] have been<br />

realized using healthy and parasitized leaves samples from Abies alba (fir). Because the<br />

pathogenic fungus Melampsorella caryophyllacearum can not be cultivated on nutritive<br />

media in laboratory, the analyzed samples have been collected from trees growing in Oituz<br />

river basin (46°08,091' N; 26°30,985' E, 651 m alt.) and transported in freezers in the<br />

laboratory. The vegetal material vegetal has been dried and crumbled. The two samples<br />

have been encoded in this way: Fr.S. – healthy leaves sample and Fr.B. – parasitized leaves<br />

sample. Separated volatile oil has been analyzed by gas-chromatography coupled with mass<br />

spectrometry, using a Neo-Clavenger installation, (GC) Agilent Technologies gas<br />

chromatograph - type 6890N.<br />

Method: 50 g of dry vegetal material crumbled in II sieve (Farmacopeea Română,<br />

X th edition) have been treated with 500 ml distilled water and 30 ml glycerin. The glycerin<br />

added on the vegetal product has the role to favor hydratation and volatile oil extraction.<br />

After the introduction of the water in graduated tube of the device and in the separator, the<br />

samples have been distilled for 3 hours. After distillation, the separation of the volatile oil<br />

has been favored by adding of 1 ml xylene; this quantity will be dropped from the final<br />

volume of the volatile oil. The separated volatile oil has been inserted in a graduated tube<br />

where its volume has been identified and reported to 100 g vegetal product.<br />

ml volatile oil (%) = 100 V/a<br />

where:<br />

V – extracted volume of volatile oil, expressed in ml;<br />

a – the mass of the used dry vegetal material, expressed in g.<br />

Results and discussions<br />

The achieved extraction capacity, expressed in ml volatile oil in 100g vegetal<br />

material, highlights a content of 2.76 in this type of compounds for Fr.S. sample and 0.37<br />

for Fr.B. sample, where a content by approximate 7.5 times smaller is observed. The<br />

analyzed volatile oil is predominantly constituted by monoterpenes and sescviterpenes<br />

(Table 2, Fig. 1 and 2).<br />

Tab. 1.The main compounds identified in volatile oil samples<br />

tR (min.) Compound<br />

Aria %<br />

Fr.S. Fr.B.<br />

4.788 santene 3.74 1.94<br />

5.429 tricyclene 1.64 0.78<br />

5.602 α−pinene 6.46 13.97<br />

5.887 camphene 6.94 5.62<br />

6.329 β−pinene 10.18 15.51<br />

6.407 myrcene 0.69 0.84<br />

6.718 α−phellandrene 0.12 0.11<br />

6.891 α−terpinene 0.08 0.06<br />

7.013 p-cymene 0.07 0.10<br />

7.116 limonene 9.48 10.06<br />

7.160 sabinene 2.18 4.29<br />

7.532 γ-terpinene 0.09 0.08<br />

82


MANOLIU ALEXANDRU, IRIMIA ROMEO, MIRCEA CORNELIA, ŞPAC ADRIAN<br />

7.965 α-terpinolene 1.50 0.57<br />

8.034 p-cymenil 0.04 0.08<br />

8.138 L-linalool 0.40 -<br />

8.198 t-allocymene 0.26 -<br />

8.389 mentha-1,4,8-triene 0.02 -<br />

8.519 fenchol 0.09 0.05<br />

8.623 α-campholenic aldehyde 0.42 0.26<br />

8.978 camphor 0.08 0.11<br />

9.107 exo-methyl-camphenilol 0.14 0.06<br />

9.194 pinocarvone 0.02 0.14<br />

9.229 isoborneol 0.03 -<br />

9.298 α-phellandrene-8-ol - 0.04<br />

9.358 endoborneol 1.66 -<br />

9.419 isopinocamphone 0.05 0.05<br />

9.454 terpinen-4-ol 0.12 0.07<br />

9.557 cis-m-menth-8-ene 0.08<br />

9.670 α-terpineol 1.37 0.80<br />

10.371 t-β-ocymene 0.20 -<br />

10.544 piperitone 0.01 -<br />

10.596 (E)-2-decenal 0.02 0.14<br />

10.873 lavandulyl acetate 0.05 -<br />

10.916 felandral 0.03 0.09<br />

11.003 (-)-bornyl acetate 12.14 7.68<br />

11.419 t.t-2,4-decadienal - 0.06<br />

11.548 1,3,5-tris(methylene)cycloheptane 0.08 -<br />

11.812 (+-)-m-mentha-1,8-diene - 0.15<br />

11.825 α-cubebene 0.14 0.08<br />

11.981 α-longipinene 1.87 0.92<br />

12.301 α-copaene 0.20 0.14<br />

12.206 δ-3-carene 0.80 -<br />

12.345 longicyclene - 0.19<br />

12.466 β-elemene 0.27 0.33<br />

12.552 sativene 0.06 -<br />

12.596 α-ylangene 0.03 0.24<br />

12.691 (-)-isoledene 0.49 -<br />

12.700 aromadendrene - 0.17<br />

12.838 isolongipholen 1.21 -<br />

12.959 (−)-β-caryophyllene 6.05 8.35<br />

13.003 α-cedrene 2.43 1.03<br />

13.063 (-)-sinularene - 0.08<br />

13.106 α-guaiene 0.04 -<br />

13.202 cis-β-bisabolen 0.03 -<br />

13.271 t-β-farrnesene 0.37 0.33<br />

13.375 α-himachalene 0.64 0.25<br />

13.444 α-humulene 2.69 4.59<br />

13.609 cis-cariophyllene 1.31 0.50<br />

13.660 γ-muurolene - 0.31<br />

83


COMPOSITION OF THE VOLATILE OIL EXTRACTED FROM ABIES ALBA MILLER LEAVES...<br />

13.756 γ-himachalene 0.65 -<br />

13.816 widdrene 1.34 -<br />

13.877 β-selinene 3.13 -<br />

13.989 α-selinene - 1.12<br />

14.050 β-himachalene 1.91 1.16<br />

14.206 α-amorphene 1.24 0.69<br />

14.266 δ−cadinene 2.54 1.81<br />

14.396 allo-aromadendrene - 0.18<br />

14.509 aromadendrene VI - 0.24<br />

15.063 valencene 0.03 -<br />

15.184 cariophyillen oxide 0.29 1.22<br />

15.513 longiborneol 0.54 -<br />

15.833 α-gurjunene 2.10 3.64<br />

15.842 (-)-longipholene - 2.22<br />

15.963 β-paciulen 0.55 -<br />

15.980 δ-cadinene - 0.37<br />

16.127 α-cadinol 0.85 -<br />

16.327 t-muurolol - 1.32<br />

20.507 β-bisabolene 0.14 -<br />

Fig. 1. Gas-chromatogram of the volatile oil – healthy leaves sample<br />

84


MANOLIU ALEXANDRU, IRIMIA ROMEO, MIRCEA CORNELIA, ŞPAC ADRIAN<br />

Fig. 2. Gas-chromatogram of the volatile oil – parasitized leaves sample<br />

By comparison with Fr.S. sample, the Fr.B. sample is characterized by an<br />

increased level of monoterpenes (61.39% Fr.S., 56.61% Fr.B.). The major monoterpenic<br />

structures are hydrocarbons, the concentration of the oxygenated derivates being increased<br />

in Fr.S. sample (16.61%) comparative with Fr.B. sample (9.35%), so the increasing of the<br />

monoterpenes content is realized through a increasing of the concentration in hydrocarbons<br />

structures. The sescviterpenes concentration is the same in both two samples, a slightly<br />

increased value being registered yet in Fr.S. sample (33.94% comparative to 31.48%).<br />

Instead, the oxygenated sescviterpenes presents an increased concentration in the<br />

parasitized sample (2.54% in Fr.B. sample comparing to 1.68% in Fr.S. sample). The<br />

reduction of the concentration in oxygenated compounds will determine a reduction of the<br />

therapeutic properties of the fir volatile oil de brad or the limitation of its use in<br />

aromatherapy.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The increase of the monoterpenes concentration in the parasitized sample could be<br />

explained by the degradative action of the enzymes produced by the pathogenic species<br />

Melampsorella caryophyllacearum or by the incapacity of syntheses from these<br />

monoterpenes of some compounds presenting a more complex structure in the parasitized<br />

plant case.<br />

The major compounds characteristic and common in both samples are the next<br />

monoterpenes: santene, α- and β-pinene, camfene, limonene, sabinene, bornilacetate, and<br />

85


COMPOSITION OF THE VOLATILE OIL EXTRACTED FROM ABIES ALBA MILLER LEAVES...<br />

also some sescviterpenic derivates: β-cariophyllene, α-cedrene, α-humulene, βhimachalene,<br />

Δ-cadinene and α-gurjunene.<br />

Modification of the content in volatile oil and of the quality of the volatile oil<br />

samples represents the consequence of the pathogenic process, which determines the<br />

impossibility of parasitized vegetal material use in order to obtain the volatile oil necessary<br />

in pharmacy, perfumes industry and aromatherapy.<br />

References<br />

1. ALEKSEEV V. A., ASTAPENKO V. V., BASOVA G., BONDAREV A. I., LUZANOV V. G.,<br />

OTNYUKOVA T. N. & YANOVSKII V. M. 1999. The condition of the Kuznetsk-Alatau fir forests.<br />

Lesnoe Khozyaistvo, 4: 51-52.<br />

2. CHERUBINI P., FONTANA G., RIGLING D., DOBBERTIN M., BRANG P. & INNES J. L. 2002. Treelife<br />

history prior to death: two fungal root pathogens affect tree-ring growth differently. J. Ecol., 90:<br />

839-850.<br />

3. FRIGIMELICA A., CARPANELLI F., STERGULC M., KNIZEK B. & GRODZKI W. 2001. Monitoring of<br />

widespread forest diseases in Friuli-Venezia Giulia (north-eastern Italy). J. For. Sci., 47: 81-84.<br />

4. MANOLIU A., IRIMIA R., GRĂDINARIU P. & UNGUREANU E. 2009. The influence of the attack of the<br />

fungus Melampsorella caryophyllacearum (DC.) J. Schrot. (“witch brooms” on fir) on the peroxidase<br />

and catalase activity in host plant. Anale Şt. Univ. Iaşi a. Genetică şi biol. molec., 10(3): 25-28.<br />

5. MERRILL W., WENNER N. G. & PEPLINSKI J. D. 1993. New host distribution records from<br />

Pennsylvania conifers. Plant Dis., 77: 430-432.<br />

6. NICOLOTTI G., CELLERINO G. P. & ANSELMI N. 1995. Distribution and damage caused by<br />

Melampsorella cariophyllacearum in Italy. Shoot and Foliage Diseases in Forest Trees, pp. 289-29.<br />

7. SKELLY J. M. & INNES J. L. 1994. Waldsterben in the forests of Central Europe and Eastern North<br />

America: Fantasy or reality?. Plant Dis., 78: 1021-1032.<br />

8. SOLLA A., SÁNCHEZ-MIRANDA Á. & CAMARERO J. J. 2006. Radial-growth and wood anatomical<br />

changes in Abies alba infected by Melampsorella caryophyllacearum: a dendroecological assessment<br />

of fungal damage. Ann. For. Sci., 63: 293-300.<br />

9. ŞTEFĂNESCU E. 1988. Uleiuri eterice din cetina principalelor specii de răşinoase din România. Revista<br />

Pădurilor. Bucureşti, 3.<br />

86


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 87-93<br />

ŞENILĂ MARIN, ŞENILĂ LĂCRIMIOARA, ROMAN CECILIA<br />

EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS FOR TRACE<br />

ELEMENTS ANALYSIS IN PERENNIAL PLANTS<br />

USING ICP-OES TECHNIQUE<br />

ŞENILĂ MARIN 1 , ŞENILĂ LĂCRIMIOARA 1 , ROMAN CECILIA 1<br />

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to present the validation of inductively coupled plasma optical emission<br />

spectrometry (ICP-OES) method used for metals determination from several perennial plant<br />

samples. The suitability of two digestion procedures using wet digestion with mineral acids mixture<br />

on hot plate and microwave digestion was investigated to determine As, Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Pb and Zn<br />

in plants samples. The LOD of the seven analysed elements in solid samples varied between 0.20µg<br />

g -1 for Mn and 0.55µg g -1 for Pb. The found values for metals determined by ICP-OES in a vegetable<br />

certified reference material digested using the two procedures were compared with the certified<br />

values and good agreements between these values were obtained. The proposed method indicated<br />

satisfactory recovery, detection limits and standard deviations for trace metal determination in<br />

perennial plants samples.<br />

Key words: ICP-OES, plant analysis, method validation, multielemental analysis<br />

Introduction<br />

For most of the analytical determinations from solid samples the sample digestion<br />

is required. The heavy metals like cadmium, copper, iron, manganese, lead and zinc in<br />

plants are determined after different digestion procedures including various mixtures of<br />

concentrated acids such as hydrofluoric acid (HF), hydrochloric acid (HCl), nitric acid<br />

(HNO3), perchloric acid (HClO4) and sulphuric acid (H2SO4). Different digestion<br />

equipment can be used: open beakers heated on hot plates, block digesters and digestion<br />

units placed in microwave ovens [MARGUI & al. 2005; GOMEZ & al. 2007].<br />

The analytical techniques that can be used for metals determination from aqueous<br />

solutions obtained through plants digestion are mainly based on atomic spectrometry with<br />

mono-elemental detection, such as flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS)<br />

[MENDIL, 2006], graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GF-AAS) [AYAR &<br />

al. 2009]. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) and<br />

inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) have the advantages of high<br />

samples throughput due to the multi-elemental determination and also, these methods have<br />

a wide working range [TORMEN & al. 2011].<br />

Due to its advantages, ICP-OES has become one of the most used techniques for<br />

elemental determination, many studies being conducted to validate this method for metals<br />

analysis in a large variety of sample types. AYDIN (2008) has compared dry, wet and<br />

microwave digestion procedures for the determination of chemical elements in wool samples<br />

using ICP-OES technique, obtaining satisfactory recovery, detection limits and standard<br />

1<br />

INCDO-INOE Research Institute for Analytical Instrumentation, 67 Donath, 400293, Cluj-Napoca – Romania,<br />

e-mail: icia@icia.ro<br />

87


EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS FOR TRACE ELEMENTS ANALYSIS IN…<br />

deviation for trace metal determination. BAKIRCIOGLU and co-workers [BAKIRCIOGLU<br />

& al. 2011] used ICP-OES technique for determination of some trace metals in cheese<br />

samples, packaged in plastic and tin containers, by ICP-OES after dry, wet and microwave<br />

digestion. ICP-OES and ICP-MS techniques were used for metals determination in vegetable<br />

seeds used in the production of biodiesel [CHAVES & al. 2010].<br />

Dantas and co-workers [DANTAS & al. 2010] have measured the metals content<br />

in gum samples obtained from the deposits of internal combustion engines, using ICP-OES<br />

after microwave digestion. The heavy metal and trace element accumulation in edible<br />

tissues of farmed and wild rainbow trout was also studied by ICP-OES [FALLAH & al.<br />

2011]. The ICP-OES technique was validated for the determination of trace elements in<br />

basil powder [GHANJAOUI & al. 2011] and for the quality control of herbal medicines<br />

[GOMEZ & al. 2007]. MARGUI & al. (2005) has made a comparative study between<br />

EDXRF and ICP-OES after microwave digestion for element determination in some plant<br />

specimens. ICP-OES was also used for metals determination in biological samples: animal<br />

tissues [MATOS & al. 2009], nuts and seeds [NAOZUKA & al. 2011] or in different food<br />

samples [NARDI & al. 2009]. This method was successfully applied for the measurement<br />

of metals in environment (water, soil and sediment samples) used in the assessment of<br />

environmental quality [FRENTIU & al. 2007; LEVEI & al. 2010; ZOBRIST & al. 2009;<br />

SENILA & al. 2011; SIMA & al. 2011].<br />

For multivariate optimization of ICP-OES technique used for the determination of<br />

microelements in fruit juice, Santos Froes and co-workers [SANTOS FROES & al. 2009]<br />

have been used the exploratory analysis (Hierarchical Cluster Analysis, HCA, and Principal<br />

Component Analysis, PCA), which evaluated the plasma conditions (nebulization gas flow<br />

rate, applied power, and sample flow rate). In other study, fractional factorial design was<br />

used for the optimization of the digestion procedures followed using ICP-OES technique<br />

for multi-elemental determination in nuts [MOMEN & al. 2007].<br />

The aim of this work is the development of an analytical method for the<br />

determination of elements (As, Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Pb and Zn) in perennial plants grown in<br />

mining polluted areas by dual view inductively coupled plasma optical emission<br />

spectrometry (ICP-OES) using two types of wet digestion methods.<br />

Material and methods<br />

A multi-elemental standard solution of 1000 mgL -1 containing all analysed<br />

elements (As, Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Pb and Zn) supplied by Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) was<br />

used for calibration. HNO3 65% and H2O2 30% from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany)<br />

analytical grade were used for samples digestion. Ultrapure water obtained by a Milli Q<br />

system (Millipore, France) was used for dilutions. A vegetable certified reference materials<br />

IAEA-359 Cabbage (Vienna, Austria) was used for the quality control of metals<br />

determination.<br />

Determinations were carried out using a Perkin Elmer Model Optima 5300 DV<br />

spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, USA) ICP-OES equipped with a Ultrasonic Nebulizer CETAC<br />

U-6000AT+ (CETAC, USA) and an auto sampler AS 93-plus. Argon (purity higher than<br />

99.995%) supplied by Linde Gas SRL (Cluj-Napoca, Romania) was used to sustain plasma<br />

and, as carrier gas. A closed-vessel microwave system Berghof MWS-3+ with temperature<br />

control mode, (Berghof, Germany) was used for wet digestion. All Teflon digestion vessels<br />

88


ŞENILĂ MARIN, ŞENILĂ LĂCRIMIOARA, ROMAN CECILIA<br />

were previously cleaned in a bath of 10% (v/v) nitric solution for 48 h to avoid crosscontamination.<br />

Four specimens of perennial plants samples (Agrostis, Agropyrum repens,<br />

Trifolium repens, Urtica dioica), collected from a mining affected area of Baia Mare<br />

(Romania), were analysed in this study. Samples were dried in an oven at 40˚C till constant<br />

weight was achieved. The dried samples were then grounded with a Mixer Grinder and<br />

sieved through a 100 microns mesh. All the samples were originally stored in closed<br />

plastics bags until analysis. The certified reference material were analysed in the same<br />

experimental conditions used for sample analyses in order to evaluate the accuracy of the<br />

method.<br />

Wet digestion on hot plate<br />

For the wet digestion a mixture of HNO3/H2O2 was used in this study. For this<br />

procedure, the temperature was maintained at 120˚C for 2 h during digestion of 1.0 g of<br />

plant sample with 16 mL of 6:2 HNO3/H2O2 mixtures on the hot plate. After cooling, 10<br />

mL of distilled water was added on the sample and mixed. The residue was filtered through<br />

filter paper and then the sample was diluted to 50 mL with distilled water. Metal contents of<br />

final solution were determined by ICP-OES.<br />

Microwave digestion<br />

Approximately 1.0 g of sample was digested with 6 mL of HNO3 and 2 mL of<br />

H2O2 in microwave digestion system, according to the digestion program presented in Tab.<br />

1. The resulting solutions were cooled and diluted to 50 mL with distilled water. The<br />

resulted solutions were analysed by ICP-OES.<br />

ICP-OES determination<br />

The operating conditions employed for ICP-OES determination were 1300W RF<br />

power, 15 L min -1 plasma flow, 2.0 L min -1 auxiliary flow, 0.8 L min -1 nebulizer flow, 1.5<br />

mL min -1 sample uptake rate. Axial view was used for metals determination, while 2-point<br />

background correction and 3 replicates were used to measure the analytical signal. The<br />

emission intensities were obtained for the most sensitive lines free of spectral interference.<br />

The calibration standards were prepared by diluting the stock multi-elemental<br />

standard solution (1000 mg L -1 ) in 0.5% (v/v) nitric acid. The calibration curves for all the<br />

studied elements were in the range of 0.01 to 1.0 mg L -1 .<br />

Results and discussion<br />

Figures of merit<br />

Method validation is an important requirement in the practice of chemical analysis<br />

and it is the process of defining an analytical requirement, and confirming that the method<br />

under consideration has performance capabilities consistent with what the application<br />

requires. The estimation of the uncertainty associated to the analytical methods is necessary<br />

in order to establish the comparability of results, and it is an important parameter in<br />

reporting of analytical results.<br />

89


EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS FOR TRACE ELEMENTS ANALYSIS IN…<br />

The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) of the method and<br />

also the main analytical characteristics of the calibration curves (slope and correlation<br />

coefficients) for the developed ICP-OES procedure are indicated in Tab 2. The instrumental<br />

detection and quantification limits were estimated by analysing ten blank solutions. The<br />

LOD is defined as three times the standard deviation of the ten measurements, while the<br />

LOQ are defined as ten times the standard deviation of the ten measurements. The LODs<br />

and LOQs were calculated for the original solid samples (µg g -1 ) by taking into account the<br />

amount of sample digested and the final volume obtained by dilution. The LOD of the<br />

seven elements studied varied between 0.20 µg g -1 for Mn and 0.55 µg g -1 for Pb. These<br />

values are appropriate for the measurement with a good accuracy of maximum admitted<br />

limits of 1 µg g -1 for Cd, 2 µg g -1 for As and 10 µg g -1 for Pb, established by the European<br />

Directive 2002/32/EC on undesirable substances in animal feed. Recovery percentage<br />

values found for the analysis of spiked plants samples varied between 89% and 113%.<br />

As no certified reference materials for perennial plants were available, the<br />

accuracy of the proposed method was evaluated by analysing a vegetable certified reference<br />

material IAEA-359 Cabbage (Vienna, Austria). The use of this material is appropriate,<br />

because the CRM was digested and diluted in the same way as the perennial plants. The<br />

results are shown in Tab 3. The obtained results by both digestion methods show good<br />

agreement for all analysed elements between found and certified values, according to the ttest<br />

for a 95% confidence level, and the method is thus considered accurate.<br />

Repeatability was established from the average relative standard deviation (RSD)<br />

of three independent analyses at the real samples. Standard addition curves obtained from a<br />

plant sample spiked at different concentration levels from 50 to 500 µg L -1 were compared<br />

with external calibration lines established from multi-elemental standards in order to<br />

evaluate the matrix effect. The recovery values ranged between 86 and 119% of the spiked<br />

values. No matrix effect has been observed and therefore aqueous standards have been used<br />

for calibration.<br />

Analytical results<br />

Shoots of the four different perennial plants samples were digested using the wet<br />

digestion on hot plate and the microwave digestion. After digestion, 7 elements were<br />

determined by ICP OES: As, Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Pb and Zn, using external calibration with<br />

aqueous standard solutions. The obtained results are shown in Tab. 4, reported with 95 %<br />

confidence limit (n = 3).<br />

According to a Student's t-test, there was no difference between the concentrations<br />

of all elements for wet digestion on hot plate and microwave digestion at a 95% confidence<br />

level. Generally, lower standard deviations were obtained using the microwave digestion<br />

method. The results obtained reveal that the proposed digestion methods and measurement<br />

technique (ICP-OES) can be successfully applied to different kind of plants analysis. The<br />

measured values for As, Cd and Pb were generally below the maximum admitted limits<br />

established by the European Directive 2002/32/EC on undesirable substances in animal<br />

feed, while for the others analysed elements there are not established maximum admitted<br />

limits.<br />

90


ŞENILĂ MARIN, ŞENILĂ LĂCRIMIOARA, ROMAN CECILIA<br />

Conclusions<br />

The principal figures of merit for the determination of trace elements by ICP-OES<br />

from perennial plants were evaluated. Two methods of sample digestion: wet digestion on<br />

hot plate and microwave digestion were compared and no significant differences between<br />

the results obtained were observed. The obtained results using the two digestion methods<br />

show good agreement with the certified values of one analysed vegetable CRM, for all<br />

analysed elements. Standard addition curves obtained from a plant sample spiked at<br />

different concentration levels were compared with external calibration lines established<br />

from multi-elemental standards and no significant matrix effect has been observed. The<br />

results show that the proposed technique (ICP-OES) and also the two digestion methods are<br />

suitable for metals determination in perennial plants.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

The financial support provided by the Romanian Ministry of Education and<br />

Research, PNCDI II Project RESOLMET no. 32161/2008 is greatly appreciated.<br />

Tab. 1. Operating conditions for the microwave digestion system<br />

Stage<br />

1 2 3 4<br />

Temperature / ˚C 160 120 100 100<br />

Ramp time / min 5 1 1 1<br />

Hold time / min 25 5 1 1<br />

Power / %* 60 20 10 10<br />

* 100 % power corresponds to 1400 W<br />

Tab. 2. Analytical parameters for metals determination using ICP-OES<br />

Element Wavelength LOD<br />

(nm) µg g -1<br />

LOQ<br />

µg g -1<br />

Slope Correlation<br />

coefficient<br />

As 188.979 0.30 0.90 13496 0.9996<br />

Cd 228.802 0.25 0.75 108844 0.9998<br />

Cu 327.393 0.30 0.90 245987 0.9995<br />

Fe 238.204 0.35 1.05 203903 0.9991<br />

Mn 257.610 0.20 0.60 1094626 0.9999<br />

Pb 220.345 0.55 1.65 23734 0.9997<br />

Zn 213.856 0.30 0.90 259230 0.9995<br />

91


EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS FOR TRACE ELEMENTS ANALYSIS IN…<br />

Tab. 3. Analytical determination of metals in reference material. Values are expressed in<br />

µg g -1 and reported as average±ts; n=3; 95% confidence level<br />

Element Certified content Found content<br />

Hot plate digestion Microwave digestion<br />

As 0.096 - 0.104 0.094±0.012 0.103±0.011<br />

Cd 0.115 - 0.125 0.120±0.018 0.119±0.012<br />

Cu 5.49 - 5.85 5.39±0.48 5.28±0.51<br />

Fe 144.1 - 151.9 146±5.32 143±4.45<br />

Mn 31.3 - 32.5 31.7±2.48 32.5±2.23<br />

Zn 37.9 - 39.3 39.5±3.07 38.8±2.19<br />

Tab. 4. Concentrations (average±ts; n=3; 95% confidence level) for perennial plants<br />

obtained by ICP OES (dry weight), expressed in µg g -1<br />

Sample/ Digestion Agrostis Agropyrum Trifolium Urtica dioica<br />

element procedure<br />

repens repens<br />

As HP* 0.55±0.06 0.46±0.08 0.35±0.06 0.47±0.07<br />

MW** 0.51±0.05 0.44±0.06 0.37±0.05 0.43±0.06<br />

Cd HP 0.89±0.09 0.69±0.07 0.55±0.06 0.96±0.12<br />

MW 0.93±0.08 0.66±0.06 0.54±0.07 0.93±0.10<br />

Cu HP 4.51±0.45 3.25±0.39 2.23±0.25 4.62±0.30<br />

MW 4.22±0.36 3.53±0.39 2.11±0.20 4.72±0.41<br />

Fe HP 79.2±4.6 65.1±4.8 41.4±3.5 72.9±5.5<br />

MW 75.5±3.8 64.2±2.2 42.9±2.1 70.1±4.0<br />

Mn HP 5.65±0.48 4.34±0.59 3.05±0.38 5.11±0.52<br />

MW 5.44±0.25 4.55±0.28 3.55±0.39 4.96±0.23<br />

Pb HP 3.51±0.22 2.08±0.33 5.18±0.42 6.41±0.58<br />

MW 3.09±0.25 2.21±0.24 4.96±0.34 6.77±0.36<br />

Zn HP 47.7±2.5 66.9±5.3 44.8±3.7 84.4±6.3<br />

MW 44.8±2.4 67.5±3.1 46.1±1.9 84.0±3.3<br />

* Hot plate; **Microwave<br />

References<br />

1. AYAR A., SERT D. & AKIN N. 2009. The trace metal levels in milk and dairy products consumed in<br />

middle Anatolia – Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assessment, 152: 1-12.<br />

2. AYDIN I. 2008. Comparison of dry, wet and microwave digestion procedures for the determination of<br />

chemical elements in wool samples in Turkey using ICP-OES technique, Microchem. J., 90: 82-87.<br />

3. BAKIRCIOGLU D., BAKIRCIOGLU KURTULUS Y. & UCAR G. 2011. Determination of some traces<br />

metal levels in cheese samples packaged in plastic and tin containers by ICP-OES after dry, wet and<br />

microwave digestion, Food Chem. Toxicol., 49: 202-207.<br />

4. CHAVES E. S., SANTOS E. J., ARAUJO R. G. O., OLIVEIRA J. V., FRESCURA V. L. A. & CURTIUS<br />

A. J. 2010. Metals and phosphorus determination in vegetable seeds used in the production of biodiesel<br />

by ICP OES and ICP-MS, Microchem. J., 96: 71-76.<br />

5. DANTAS A. N. S, COSTA R. S., GOUVEIA S. T. & LOPES G. S. 2010. Development of a microwaveassisted<br />

digestion method using ICP-OES to measure metals in gum deposits of internal combustion<br />

engines, Fuel Process. Technol., 9: 1422-1427.<br />

92


ŞENILĂ MARIN, ŞENILĂ LĂCRIMIOARA, ROMAN CECILIA<br />

6. FALLAH A. A., SAEI-DEHKORDI S. S., NEMATOLLAHI A. & JAFARI T. 2011. Comparative study of<br />

heavy metal and trace element accumulation in edible tissues of farmed and wild rainbow trout<br />

(Oncorhynchus mykiss) using ICP-OES technique, Microchem. J., 98: 275-279.<br />

7. FRENTIU T., PONTA M., LEVEI E., ŞENILĂ M., URSU M. & CORDOS E. 2007. Interlaboratory study<br />

on Cu, Pb and Zn determination in soil by ICP-OES using the Bland and Altman test, J. Optoelectron.<br />

Adv. M., 9: 3505-3513.<br />

8. GHANJAOUI M. E., CERVERA M. L., EL RHAZI M. & GUARDIA M. 2011. Validated fast procedure for<br />

trace element determination in basil powder, Food Chem., 125:1309-1313.<br />

9. GOMEZ M. R., CERUTTI S., SOMBRA L. L., SILVA M. F. & MARTINEZ L. D. 2007. Determination of<br />

heavy metals for the quality control in argentinian herbal medicines by ETAAS and ICP-OES, Food<br />

Chem. Toxicol., 45: 1060-1064.<br />

10. LEVEI E., MICLEAN M., SENILA M., CADAR O., ROMAN C. & MICLE V. 2010. Assessment of Pb,<br />

Cd, Cu and Zn availability for plants in Baia Mare Mining Region, J. Plant Develop., 17: 139-144.<br />

11. MARGUI E., QUERALT I., CARVALHO M.L. & HIDALGO M. 2005. Comparison of EDXRF and ICP-<br />

OES after microwave digestion for element determination in plant specimens from an abandoned<br />

mining area, Anal. Chim. Acta, 549: 197-204.<br />

12. MATOS W. O., MENEZES E. A., GONZALEZ M. H., COSTA L. M., LILIAN C., TREVIZAN L. C. &<br />

NOGUEIRA A. R. A. 2009. Partial microwave-assisted wet digestion of animal tissue using a babybottle<br />

sterilizer for analyte determination by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry,<br />

Spectrochim. Acta B, 64: 615-618.<br />

13. MENDIL D. 2006. Mineral and trace metal levels in some cheese collected from Turkey, Food Chem., 96:<br />

532-537.<br />

14. MOMEN A. A., ZACHARIADIS G. A., ANTHEMIDIS A. N. & STRATIS J. A. 2007. Use of fractional<br />

factorial design for optimization of digestion procedures followed by multi-element determination of<br />

essential and non-essential elements in nuts using ICP-OES technique, Talanta, 71: 443-451.<br />

15. NAOZUKA J., VIEIRA E. C., NASCIMENTO A. N. & OLIVEIRA P. V. 2011. Elemental analysis of nuts<br />

and seeds by axially viewed ICP OES, Food Chem., 124: 1667-1672.<br />

16. NARDI E. P., EVANGELISTA F. S., TORMEN L., SAINT PIERRE T. D., CURTIUS A. J., SOUZA S. S.<br />

& BARBOSA F. 2009. The use of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for the<br />

determination of toxic and essential elements in different types of food samples, Food Chem., 112: 727-<br />

732.<br />

17. SANTOS FROES R. E., BORGES NETO W., COUTO E SILVA N. O., PEREIRA NAVEIRA R. L.,<br />

NASCENTES C. C. & BORBA DA SILVA J. B. 2009. Multivariate optimization by exploratory<br />

analysis applied to the determination of microelements in fruit juice by inductively coupled plasma<br />

optical emission spectrometry, Spectrochim. Acta B, 64: 619-622.<br />

18. ŞENILĂ M., LEVEI E., MICLEAN M., ŞENILĂ L., ŞTEFĂNESCU L., MĂRGINEAN S., OZUNU A. &<br />

ROMAN C. 2011. Influence of pollution level on heavy metals mobility in soil from NW Romania,<br />

Environ. Eng. Manag. J., 10: 59-64.<br />

19. SIMA M., DOLD B., FREI L, ŞENILĂ M., BALTEANU D. & ZOBRIST J. 2011. Sulfide oxidation and<br />

acid mine drainage formation within two active tailings impoundments in the Golden Quadrangle of the<br />

Apuseni Mountains, Romania, J. Hazard. Mater., 189: 624-639.<br />

20. TORMEN L., PLACIDO TORRES D., MARIA DITTERT I., ARAUJO R. G. O & FRESCURA V. L. A.<br />

2011. Jose Curtius, A., Rapid assessment of metal contamination in commercial fruit juices by<br />

inductively coupled mass spectrometry after a simple dilution, J Food Compos. Anal., 24: 96-102.<br />

21. ZOBRIST J., SIMA M., DOGARU D., ŞENILĂ M., YANG H., POPESCU C., ROMAN C., BELA A.,<br />

FREI L., DOLD B. & BALTEANU D. 2009. Environmental and socioeconomic assessment of impacts<br />

by mining activities – a case study in the Certej River catchment, Western Carpathians, Romania,<br />

Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., 16: 14-26.<br />

93


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 95-102<br />

RADU MIHAI-IULIAN, ŞESAN TATIANA-EUGENIA<br />

CONTRIBUTION TO THE MACROMYCETES BIODIVERSITY<br />

FROM BOLINTIN DEAL FOREST – GIURGIU, ROMANIA<br />

RADU MIHAI-IULIAN 1 , ŞESAN TATIANA-EUGENIA 1<br />

Abstract: The paper contains the results of macromycetes investigations within the Bolintin Deal Forest<br />

near the city of Bucharest. The research objective was to inventory the species for this area,<br />

establishing the present status of biodiversity of fungi. There were identified 59 species of<br />

macromycetes. All the identified species represent a new contribution due to the lack of<br />

mycological research in the given area. The study is part of a larger research regarding the<br />

diversity and distribution of macromycetes in Bucharest and its surroundings, Romania.<br />

Keywords: fungal distribution and diversity, macromycetes, taxonomy, Bolintin Deal Forest, Giurgiu,<br />

Romania<br />

Introduction<br />

The Bolintin-Deal Forest, also known as Berceni Forest or Cotroceanca Forest is<br />

located in west of the Bucharest city, in-between the meadows of the rivers Ciorogârla (on<br />

the east side) and Sabar (on the west side). The forest should not be confused with Bolintin<br />

Forest or the Large Forest of Bolintin which is located more to the west and which is a SCI<br />

site according to the European Commission Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC). The<br />

geographic limits coordinates are East – Lat. 44°44'77'' / Lon. 25°83'13'', West – Lat.<br />

44°44'33'' / Lon. 25°86'49'', North – Lat. 44°45'00'' / Lon. 25°83'56'' and South – Lat.<br />

44°43'27'' / Lon. 25°84'66'' according to the WGS84 standard and is located in MK-02<br />

according to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) geographic coordinate system. The<br />

altitude is 102–117 meters.<br />

From a geographical point of view the area is part of the Vlăsia Plain, which is a<br />

climatic and hydro-geographically interference area belonging to the Valachian platform.<br />

The link-up of the atmospheric masses from the NE and W-SW reflects a characteristic<br />

vegetation and soil structure [POSEA & ŞTEFĂNESCU, 1983].<br />

The clime is temperate with some slight immoderate changes. The excessive<br />

humidity area which would characterize the general location between two river meadows is<br />

slightly attenuated, as the forest is also neighbored on west by the village Bolintin Deal and<br />

on the east the village Ciorogârla. Overall the forest has, in spite of its location, slight<br />

xerophile characteristics, most of the small herbs found during early and mid summer<br />

having small vegetation period. The soils are typical brown and brown-auburn forest soils.<br />

Vegetation is typical to the forest-stepic area and consists of trees (mainly Quercus<br />

genus) and small herbs (mainly from the Poaceae family).<br />

The native flora consists especially of trees and bushes belonging to the following<br />

species: Quercus pedunculiflora L., Quercus cerris L., Tilia platyphyllos Scop., Tilia<br />

1 Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, 1-3 Portocalelor St., district 5, Bucharest – Romania, e-mail:<br />

radu_mihai_iulian@hotmail.com, tatianasesan@yahoo.com<br />

95


CONTRIBUTION TO THE MACROMYCETES BIODIVERSITY FROM BOLINTIN DEAL FOREST…<br />

tomentosa Moench., Ulmus sp., Carpinus betulus L., Cornus mas L., Crataegus monogyna<br />

Jacq. On the southern side, there is a swampy area with Salix sp. and Populus alba. Also on<br />

each edge of the forest there are species of Sambucus nigra L. şi Prunus cerasifera Ehrh.<br />

var. cerasifera (cultivated). The herbs consists of early species, which blossom before the<br />

trees can develop their crowns such as: Corydalis cava (L.) Schweigg. et Koerte, Ficaria<br />

verna Hudson, Anemone ranunculoides L., Anemone nemorosa L., Scilla bifolia L., Viola<br />

hirta L. etc. Also species of Arum maculatum L. and Pulmonaria officinalis L. are frequent.<br />

Material and method<br />

The mycological material was gathered during many field trips to the specified<br />

area in different seasons of the years 2009, 2010 and 2011. Some of the easiest<br />

identifications were made in the field and noted. Also in situ photographs have been taken<br />

using a Canon S3 IS camera. The material collected was brought to analysis in the<br />

laboratory. The examinations included macroscopic as well as microscopic aspects. The<br />

macroscopic consisted in the analysis of the color (cap, gills, spore-print, stalk),<br />

consistency, morphology, taste, odor, presence and characteristics of the latex and so on.<br />

For macroscopic analysis an Optika trinocular stereozoom microscope model SZM-GEM-<br />

2, eyepieces 10x and zoom head magnification 0.7x – 4.5x, equipped with an USB digital<br />

camera model Optikam Pro5, 5Mp have been used.<br />

The microscopic features that were pursued are referring to the morphology of the<br />

spores and other structures (cystidia, cap cuticle etc.). The observations made were noted<br />

and used in the process of identification the species. Most of the material was dried and is<br />

in the author’s possession.<br />

During determination, on some taxons we have also analyzed chemical<br />

characteristics using ferrous sulphate (FeSO4) – aqueous solution 10% and sulphovanilin<br />

(for Russula species), Melzer’s reagent (aqueous solution of chloral hydrate, potassium<br />

iodide and iodine) – to test spores on white spored mushrooms – and potassium hydroxide<br />

– aqueous solution 10%.<br />

For microscopic staining techniques several other chemicals were also used such<br />

as Congo red, aniline blue (Cotton blue 4B), Phloxine and Cresyl blue.<br />

The mycological nomenclature used is taken after SĂLĂGEANU &<br />

SĂLĂGEANU (1985), ŞESAN & TĂNASE (2006), TĂNASE & ŞESAN (2006),<br />

TĂNASE et al. (2009) as well as some macromycetes books and monographs such as<br />

ROMAGNESI (1967, 1981), BON (1988a, b), BREITENBACH & KRÄNZLIN (1984,<br />

1986, 1991), COURTECUISSE & DUHEM (1994), BORGARINO & HURTADO (2001),<br />

ROUX (2006) and others. The international herbaria names are taken after HOLMGREN &<br />

al. (1990), the name of the authors, after KIRK & ANSELL (1992) and Systematics of the<br />

Fungi regnum after KIRK & al. (2001, 2008) and CANNON & KIRK (2007). The<br />

scientific names (current names) have been updated according to the Index Fungorum<br />

[KIRK, 2011]. The Tracheophytes nomenclature is taken after Flora of Romania<br />

[SĂVULESCU, 1952-1976].<br />

96


RADU MIHAI-IULIAN, ŞESAN TATIANA-EUGENIA<br />

Results and discussions<br />

There were identified 59 species of macromycetes (49 genera) belonging to 3<br />

classes of the regnum Fungi: 2 Myxomycetes (3%), 6 Ascomycetes (10%) and 51<br />

Basidiomycetes (87%) (Fig. 1). All the taxons represent an absolute novelty for the studied<br />

area [ELIADE, 1965; BONTEA, 1985-1986; TĂNASE & POP, 2005].<br />

Out of the taxons identified, from ecological point of view, there were identified<br />

31 species (53%) of wood fungi and 28 species (47%) of soil fungi (Fig. 2); a number of 7<br />

species (12%) form ectomycorrhizas, 9 (15%) are parasitic and 43 species (73%) are<br />

saprotrophs (Fig. 3).<br />

87%<br />

10%<br />

Myxomycetes Ascomycetes Basidiomycetes<br />

Fig. 1. Classes of macromycetes identified in the Bolintin Deal Forest<br />

53%<br />

97<br />

3%<br />

47%<br />

Wood fungi Soil fungi<br />

Fig. 2. Wood and soil fungi identified in the Bolintin Deal Forest<br />

73%<br />

15%<br />

12%<br />

Mycorrhizant Parasitic Saprotrophs<br />

Fig. 3. Proportion of the fungi, after their nutritional characteristics, identified in<br />

the Bolintin Deal Forest


CONTRIBUTION TO THE MACROMYCETES BIODIVERSITY FROM BOLINTIN DEAL FOREST…<br />

List of species is presented in alphabetical order, with indication of location and<br />

date of first occurence.<br />

Myxogastrea<br />

Arcyria denudata (L.) Wettst., ad solum - 21.05.2011, in Carpino-Quercetum, alt. 107 m.<br />

Lycogala epidendrum (J. C. Buxb. ex L.) Fr., in ligno ramulos deciduos - 30.08.2009, in<br />

Carpino-Quercetum, alt. 107 m.<br />

Ascomycota<br />

Arachnopeziza aurelia (Pers.) Fuckel, ad ramulos deciduos - 20.06.2009, in Tilio-<br />

Quercetum, alt. 110 m.<br />

Humaria hemisphaerica (F. H. Wigg.) Fuckel, ad solum - 30.08.2009, in Quercetum, alt.<br />

110 m.<br />

Hypoxylon fragiforme (Pers.) J. Kickx, ad truncus amputatus decorticatus- 30.08.2009, in<br />

Carpino- Quercetum, alt. 107 m.<br />

Peziza vesiculosa Bull., ad solum - 21.05.2011, ad marginem Quercetum, alt. 115 m.<br />

(Fig. 4).<br />

Tarzetta catinus (Holmsk.) Korf & J. K. Rogers, ad solum - 21.05.2011, in Tilio-<br />

Quercetum, alt. 110 m (Fig. 5).<br />

Xylaria polymorpha (Pers.) Grev., in ligno trunci amputati - 30.08.2009, in Quercetum<br />

alt. 110 m.<br />

Basidiomycota<br />

Amanita rubescens Pers. var. rubescens, ad solum - 21.05.2011, in Tilio-Quercetum, alt.<br />

110 m (Fig. 7).<br />

Armillaria mellea (Vahl) P. Kumm. s.l., ad cortex truncus amputatus - 30.08.2009, in<br />

Carpino-Quercetum, alt. 107 m.<br />

Auricularia auricula-judae (Bull.) Quél., ad cortex ramulos deciduos sambuci -<br />

21.05.2011, ad marginem silvarum, alt. 115 m.<br />

Auricularia mesenterica (Dicks.) Pers., ad trunco amputato decorticato - 30.08.2009, in<br />

Tilio-Quercetum, alt. 110 m.<br />

Bjerkandera adusta (Willd.) P. Karst., ad cortex truncus amputatus - 20.06.2009, in<br />

Quercetum, alt. 117m.<br />

Bolbitius titubans (Bull.) Fr. var. titubans, ad cortex putrido in solum - 21.05.2011, in<br />

Tilio-Quercetum, alt. 110 m.<br />

Boletus badius (Fr.) Fr. ?, ad solum - 20.06.2009, in Carpino-Quercetum, alt. 107 m.<br />

Calocera cornea (Batsch) Fr., ad ramulos deciduos - 21.05.2011, in Quercetum, alt. 115<br />

m (Fig. 9).<br />

Coprinopsis picacea (Bull.) Redhead, Vilgalys & Moncalvo, ad solum - 30.08.2009, in<br />

Carpino-Quercetum, alt. 107 m.<br />

Coprinellus disseminatus (Pers.) J. E. Lange [‘disseminata’], ad cortex putrido truncus<br />

amputatus - 30.08.2009, in Quercetum, alt. 110 m.<br />

Cyathus striatus (Huds.) Willd, ad radices crataegi parti in solum - 13.08.2011, ad<br />

marginem silvarum, alt. 117 m.<br />

Dacrymyces stillatus Nees, ad ramulos deciduos decorticatae - 30.08.2009, in Tilio-<br />

Quercetum, alt. 110 m.<br />

Daedalea quercina (L.) Pers., ad cortex truncus amputatus - 20.06.2009, in Quercetum,<br />

alt. 117 m.<br />

98


RADU MIHAI-IULIAN, ŞESAN TATIANA-EUGENIA<br />

Daedaleopsis confragosa (Bolton) J. Schröt., ad ramulos deciduos - 13.08.2011, in Tilio-<br />

Quercetum, alt. 110 m.<br />

Fistulina hepatica (Schaeff.) With., ad cortex quercinum - 13.08.2011, in Quercetum, alt.<br />

117 m.<br />

Fomes fomentarius (L.) J. J. Kickx, ad cortex tili - 30.08.2009, in Tilio-Quercetum, alt.<br />

110 m.<br />

Galerina paludosa (Fr.) Kühner, ad muscum super trunco amputato - 21.05.2011, in<br />

Tilio-Quercetum, alt. 110 m.<br />

Ganoderma applanatum (Pers.) Pat., in ligno truncus amputatus - 20.06.2009, in<br />

Carpino-Quercetum, alt. 107 m.<br />

Ganoderma lucidum (Curtis) P. Karst., in ligno truncus amputatus - 20.06.2009, in<br />

Quercetum, alt. 117 m.<br />

Gymnopus dryophilus (Bull.) Murrill, ad solum - 20.06.2009, in Carpino-Quercetum,<br />

alt. 107 m.<br />

Gymnopus fusipes (Bull.) Gray, ad solum - 30.08.2009, in Quercetum, alt. 115 m.<br />

Hymenochaete rubiginosa (Dicks.) Lév., ad trunco amputato - 20.06.2009, in Tilio-<br />

Quercetum, alt. 110 m.<br />

Hyphodontia quercina (Pers.) J. Erikss., ad ramulos deciduos - 20.06.2009, in Carpino-<br />

Quercetum, alt. 107 m.<br />

Hypholoma fasciculare (Huds.) P. Kumm. var. fasciculare, ad cortex putrido -<br />

20.06.2009, in Quercetum, alt. 110 m.<br />

Kuehneromyces lignicola (Peck) Redhead, ad cortex truncus amputatus - 30.08.2009, in<br />

Tilio-Quercetum, alt. 110 m.<br />

Lactarius acerrimus Britzelm., ad solum - 13.08.2011, in Carpino-Quercetum, alt . 107<br />

m.<br />

Lenzites betulina (L.) Fr., ad ramulos deciduos - 13.08.2011, in Carpino-Quercetum, alt.<br />

107 m.<br />

Lepista nuda (Bull.) Cooke, ad solum - 21.05.2011, in Quercetum, alt. 110 m.<br />

Leucopaxillus giganteus (Sowerby) Singer, ad solum - 20.06.2009, ad marginem<br />

Quercetum, alt. 117 m.<br />

Lycoperdon pyriforme Schaeff., ad solum - 20.06.2009, in Tilio-Quercetum, alt. 110 m.<br />

Macrolepiota procera (Scop.) Singer var. Procera, ad solum - 30.08.2009, in Quercetum,<br />

alt. 117 m.<br />

Marasmius oreades (Bolton) Fr., ad solum - 30.08.2009, ad marginem silvarum, alt. 117<br />

m.<br />

Marasmius rotula (Scop.) Fr., ad cortex putrido - 20.06.2009, in Tilio-Quercetum, alt.<br />

110 m.<br />

Oudemansiella mucida (Schrad.) Höhn., ad cortex truncus amputatus - 20.06.2009, in<br />

Tilio-Quercetum, alt. 110 m.<br />

Parasola plicatilis (Curtis) Redhead, Vilgalys & Hopple, ad solum - 21.05.2011, ad<br />

marginem callis intram Quercetum, alt. 117 m.<br />

Phallus impudicus L. var. impudicus, ad solum - 13.08.2011, in Carpino-Quercetum,<br />

alt. 107 m (Fig. 6).<br />

Phylloporia ribis (Schumach.) Ryvarden, ad cortex crataegi - 20.06.2009, in Tilio-<br />

Quercetum, alt. 110 m.<br />

Pluteus cervinus (Schaeff.) P. Kumm., ad cortex truncus amputatus - 30.08.2009, in<br />

Tilio-Quercetum, alt. 110 m.<br />

99


CONTRIBUTION TO THE MACROMYCETES BIODIVERSITY FROM BOLINTIN DEAL FOREST…<br />

Russula cyanoxantha (Schaeff.) Fr., ad solum - 20.06.2009, in Tilio-Quercetum, alt. 110<br />

m.<br />

Russula foetens (Pers.) Pers., ad solum - 20.06.2009, in Quercetum, alt. 115 m.<br />

Russula heterophylla (Fr.) Fr., ad solum - 13.08.2011, in Tilio-Quercetum, alt. 110 m.<br />

Russula persicina Krombh., ad solum - 13.08.2011, in Quercetum, alt. 115 m (Fig. 8).<br />

Russula virescens (Schaeff.) Fr., ad solum - 13.08.2011, in Quercetum, alt. 115 m.<br />

Schizophyllum commune Fr., ad ramulos deciduos - 20.06.2009, in Quercetum, alt. 117<br />

m.<br />

Scleroderma citrinum Pers. var. citrinum, ad solum - 30.08.2009, in Tilio-Quercetum alt.<br />

110 m.<br />

Scleroderma verrucosum (Bull.) Pers., ad solum - 13.08.2011, in Quercetum, alt. 115 m.<br />

Stereum hirsutum (Willd.) Pers., ad cortex truncus amputatus - 20.06.2009, in Tilio-<br />

Quercetum, alt. 110 m.<br />

Trametes hirsutum (Wulfen) Lloyd, ad cortex truncus amputatus - 30.08.2009, in Tilio-<br />

Quercetum, alt. 110 m.<br />

Trametes versicolor (L.) Lloyd, ad cortex truncus amputatus - 20.06.2009, in Tilio-<br />

Quercetum, alt. 110 m.<br />

Volvariella bombycina (Schaeff.) Singer, ad cortex truncus amputatus - 20.06.2009, in<br />

Carpino-Quercetum, alt. 107 m.<br />

Xerula radicata (Relhan) Dörfelt, ad trunco amputato putrido - 20.06.2009, in Carpino-<br />

Quercetum, alt. 107 m.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The study of macromycetes biodiversity in Bolintin-Deal Forest is the first one of<br />

this kind in this area, and since there are no bibliographic references, the whole study brings<br />

new mycological data regarding the surrounding forests of Bucharest that have been once<br />

part of the Vlăsia Plain.<br />

Determination of 59 different taxa during 2009-2011 indicated a large biodiversity<br />

in an area that is virtually unknown.<br />

Importance of the study resides in the new information of an area far too little<br />

investigated, keeping open a perspective of a more larger study of the forests near<br />

Bucharest with the purpose to know, protect and conserve their biodiversity.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

The authors would like to thank for all the support to Mr. Gavril Negrean, who<br />

provided some of the bibliography consulted and for all the good advices. For all the help<br />

given in the field we would like to thank to Mr. Daniel Kazimir Kurzeluk.<br />

This contribution has been presented at the XVI th Congress of European<br />

Mycologists, in Halkidiki, Porto Carras, Greece (19-23 September 2011), in the Section of<br />

Fungal distribution and diversity under the moderation of Paul M. KIRK (UK).<br />

100


RADU MIHAI-IULIAN, ŞESAN TATIANA-EUGENIA<br />

References<br />

1. BON M. 1988a. Clé monographique des russules d’Europe. Documents mycologiques, Lille, 18(70-71): 120 pp.<br />

2. BON M. 1988b. Champignons de France et de l'Europe Occidentale. Paris: Arthaud Edit., 368 pp.<br />

3. BORGARINO D. & HURTADO C. 2001. Champignons de Provence, Haute-Provence et Midi<br />

Méditerranéen, Édisud, Aix-en-Provence, 440 pp.<br />

4. BONTEA V. 1985, 1986. Ciuperci parazite şi saprofite din R.P.R., vol. 1, 2. Bucureşti: Ed. Academiei<br />

Române, Bucureşti, 586 pp. (vol. I), 469 pp. (vol. II).<br />

5. BREITENBACH J. & KRÄNZLIN F. 1984. Champignons de Suisse. T. l. Ascomycetes. Lucerne: Ed.<br />

Mykologia, Suisse, 310 pp., 390 photos; 1986, T. 2. Heterobasidiomycetes, Aphyllophorales,<br />

Gasteromycetes. Lucerne: Ed. Mykologia, Suisse, 412 pp., 528 photos; 1991, T. 3. Bolets et<br />

champignons à lames. Lucerne: Ed. Mykologia, Suisse, 359 pp., 450 photos.<br />

6. CANNON P. F. & KIRK P. M. 2007. Fungal families of the world. Wallingford: Edit. CABI, UK, 456 pp.,<br />

col plates, illus.<br />

7. COURTECUISSE R. & DUHEM B. 1994. Guide des Champignons de France et d’Europe. Lausanne: Edit.<br />

Delachaux & Niestlé, 480 pp., col plates.<br />

8. ELIADE E. 1965. Conspectul Macromicetelor din România. Acta Bot. Horti bucurest. Lucr. Grăd. Bot.<br />

Bucureşti, 1964-1965: 185-324.<br />

9. HOLMGREN PATRICIA K., HOLMGREN N. H. & BARNETT L. C. 1990. Index Herbariorum, Part I: The<br />

herbaria of the world. 8 th Ed. Regnum Veg., 120: 704 pp.<br />

10. KIRK P. M. & ANSELL A. E. 1992. Authors of fungal names - a list of scientific names of fungi, with<br />

recommended standard forms of their names, including abbreviations. Index of Fungi Supplement.<br />

Wallington, CAB International, ISBN 0 85198 833 4, 95 pp.<br />

11. KIRK P. M., CANNON P. F., DAVID J. C. & STALPERS J. 2001. Ainsworth and Bisby’s Dictionary of the<br />

Fungi. 9 th edition. Wallingford: Ed. CAB International, UK, 655 pp.<br />

12. KIRK P. M., CANNON P. F., MINTER D. W. & STALPERS J. A. 2008. Dictionary of the Fungi, 10 th<br />

edition, CABI International, UK, 771 pp.<br />

13. POSEA G. & ŞTEFĂNESCU I. 1983. Judeţele patriei: Municipiul Bucureşti cu sectorul agricol Ilfov.<br />

Bucureşti: Edit. Academiei R.P.R., 291 pp.<br />

14. ROMAGNESI H. 1967. Les Russules d'Europe et d'Afrique du Nord. Paris: Éd. Bordas, France, 998 pp.,<br />

1129 text figs., 1 plate.<br />

15. ROMAGNESI H. 1981. Petit guide des champignons, Bordas Paris, 237 pp.<br />

16. ROUX P. 2006. Mille et un champignons ('A Thousand and One Mushrooms'). Sainte Sigolène: Éd. Roux –<br />

France, 1224 pp.<br />

17. SĂLĂGEANU G. & SĂLĂGEANU A. 1985. Determinator pentru recunoaşterea ciupercilor comestibile şi<br />

otrăvitoare din România. Bucureşti: Edit. Ceres, 330 pp., 145 fig., 28 pl. color.<br />

18. SĂVULESCU T. (Ed.). 1952-1976. Flora R.P.R – R.S.R., Vol. 1-13. Bucureşti: Edit. Academiei Române.<br />

19. ŞESAN TATIANA EUGENIA & TĂNASE C. 2006. MYCOBIOTA. Sisteme de clasificare, Edit. Univ.<br />

„Alexandru Ioan Cuza” Iaşi, 251 pp.<br />

20. TĂNASE C. & ŞESAN TATIANA EUGENIA. 2006. Concepte actuale în taxonomia ciupercilor, Edit.<br />

Univ. „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” Iaşi, 510 pp.<br />

21. TĂNASE C. & POP ADRIANA 2005. Red List of Romanian Macrofungi species. Bioplatform- Romanian<br />

National Platform for Biodiversity. Bucureşti: Edit. Academiei Române, pp. 101-107.<br />

22. TĂNASE C., BÎRSAN C., CHINAN V. & COJOCARIU A. 2009. Macromicete din România, Edit. Univ.<br />

„Alexandru Ioan Cuza” Iaşi, 563 pp.<br />

23. * * http://www. indexfungorum.org/Index.htm.<br />

24. * * European Commission Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC).<br />

101


CONTRIBUTION TO THE MACROMYCETES BIODIVERSITY FROM BOLINTIN DEAL FOREST…<br />

Fig. 4. Peziza vesiculosa Bull.<br />

Fig. 6. Phallus impudicus L. var. impudicus<br />

Fig. 8. Russula persicina Krombh.<br />

102<br />

Fig. 5. Tarzetta catinus (Holmsk.) Korf & J.K.<br />

Rogers<br />

Fig. 7. Amanita rubescens Pers. var. rubescens<br />

Fig. 9. Calocera cornea (Batsch) Fr.


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 103-104<br />

103<br />

CIOCÂRLAN VASILE<br />

GALIUM RUTHENICUM WILLD. IN FLORA OF ROMANIA<br />

CIOCÂRLAN VASILE 1<br />

Abstract: A newly identified species in the vascular flora of Romania, namely Galium ruthenicum Willd. is<br />

published now. This taxa has been identified in Tulcea county, Dobrudja province. It is grown on<br />

sunny, rocky places.<br />

It is also mentioned the differences against Galium verum L., a morphologically close taxa in flora<br />

of Romania.<br />

Keywords: Galium ruthenicum, features, ecology, distribution, Romania’s flora<br />

Introduction<br />

The genus Galium L. has 145 species in Flora Europaea [EHRENDORFER &<br />

KRENDL, 1976]. In Romania, the same genus Galium L. include 27 species [PAUCĂ &<br />

NYÁRÁDY, 1961]. Later on, there has been added other 9 species [CIOCÂRLAN, 2009].<br />

Thus, in Romania’s flora there are 38 species in the genus of Galium L.<br />

There is added an other species in this Galium L. genus in this paper.<br />

Galium ruthenicum Willd., Sp. Pl. 1: 597 (1798) (G. verum L. subsp. ruthenicum<br />

(Willd.) P. Fourn.) is a morphologically close to a common species in flora of Romania,<br />

namely de G. verum L. These two species, Galium ruthenicum Willd. and G. verum L., are<br />

distinguished by several features presented further on, but especially by their ecology and<br />

distribution area.<br />

Characteristics<br />

The detailed description of Galium ruthenicum Willd. is made in Flora of the<br />

USSR, vol. XXIII [POBEDIMOVA, 1958]. The own characteristics of this species are like<br />

the next:<br />

– leaves linear-filiforms, 7-8 in whorls (at G. verum the leaves are disposed as 8-12 in<br />

whorls), 25-30 mm long and 0.5 mm wide (at G. verum the leaves are of 0.5-1.5 (–2) mm<br />

wide);<br />

– pedicels and especially the fruits have densely, harsh hairs (at G. verum the fruits are<br />

glabrous) (Fig. 1).<br />

Distribution and ecology<br />

From distribution and ecology points of view, these two taxa are fundamentally<br />

different. Galium verum is a species with a wide area of distribution, as it is distributed in<br />

the whole area of Eurasia. It is grown from the sea level to ca 1200 m.<br />

Galium ruthenicum is a pontic species, growing in steppic areas, often in rocky<br />

places.<br />

1 University of Agronomical Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 59 Mărăşti Av., 011464, Bucharest – Romania


GALIUM RUTHENICUM WILLD. IN FLORA OF ROMANIA<br />

In Europe, Galium ruthenicum is distributed in Russia of SE, Ukraine, R. of<br />

Moldova [STANKOV & TALIEV, 1949; MAIEVSKII, 1954; POBEDIMOVA, 1958;<br />

GEIDEMAN, 1954; ZEROV, 1965].<br />

In România, Galium ruthenicum has been identified in Dobrudja, Tulcea county,<br />

on a stony hill, ca 2 Km North of Făgăraşul Nou village.<br />

Accompanying species:<br />

Achillea leptophilla,<br />

Allium guttatum,<br />

Cleistogenes bulgarica,<br />

Hieracium echioides subsp. procerum,<br />

Moehringia grisebachii (on rocks, only)<br />

Onobrychis arenaria,<br />

Seseli pallassii,<br />

Stachys angustifolia,<br />

Veronica spicata subsp. barrielieri.<br />

Voucher specimens were deposited in the Herbarium BUAG, sheet no. 23947.<br />

References<br />

1. CIOCÂRLAN V. 2009. Flora ilustrată a României. Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta (ed. III). Bucureşti: Edit.<br />

Ceres, 1138 pp.<br />

2. EHRENDORFER F. & KRENDL F. 1976. Genus Galium L., In Flora Europaea, 4. Cambridge: Cambridge<br />

University Press.<br />

3. GEIDEMAN T. 1954. Opredelitel’ Rastenii Moldavskoi SSR. Moskva - Leningrad.<br />

4. MAIEVSKII. 1954. Flora Srednei Polosâ Evropeiskoi Časti SSSR. Leningrad.<br />

5. PAUCĂ A. & E. I. NYÁRÁDY. 1961. Genul Galium L., în Flora R. P. Române.<br />

6. POBEDIMOVA E. 1958. Genus Galium L., In Flora U. S. S. R., XXIII. Moskva - Leningrad.<br />

7. STANKOV S. & TALIEV V. 1949. Opredelitel’ vâsşih Rastenii Evropeiskoi Časti SSSR. Moskva.<br />

8. ZEROV D. et al. (ed.). 1965. Viznacinik Roslin Ukraini, Ed. 2. Kiev.<br />

Fig. 1. Galium ruthenicum Willd. (original)<br />

104


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 105-108<br />

THE VARIABILITY OF CEPHALARIA URALENSIS<br />

(MURRAY) ROEM. ET SCHULT.<br />

CIOCÂRLAN VASILE 1<br />

105<br />

CIOCÂRLAN VASILE<br />

Abstract: The variability of Cephalaria uralensis (Murray) Roem. et Schult., incl. subsp. dobrogensis<br />

Ciocârlan, subsp. nova, and an identification key, are presented in this paper.<br />

Keywords: Cephalaria uralensis, variability, features, ecology, distribution, Romania’s flora<br />

Introduction<br />

Cephalaria uralensis (Murray) Roem. et Schult. is a Pontic–Balkanic species,<br />

distributed in Russia (C, W, E, Crimea), Bulgaria, Romania, Serbia, and, probable, in<br />

Greece [FERGUSON, 1976].<br />

This species is distributed in Transylvania, Banat, Oltenia, Muntenia, Moldavia,<br />

Bucovina, and Dobrudja [OPREA, 2005].<br />

As ecology, it is a xerophyllous species, growing on dry and sunny places, but also<br />

on rocky substrates.<br />

Material and methods<br />

Data on the variability of Cephalaria uralensis (Murray) Roem. et Schult. exist in<br />

flora of Serbie, only [DIKLIĆ, 1973], where are given two varieties, as: var. uralensis and<br />

var. puberula (Adamović) Diklić.<br />

In Flora of R. P. Române, vol. VIII [PRODAN, 1961] it is given a form, namely f.<br />

obtusilaciniata Răv.<br />

In Conspectus Florae Romaniae [BORZA, 1949] there is given an other forms,<br />

namely: f. dentata Schur, f. intermedia Schur, and f. tenuisecta Schur.<br />

In Flora of R. S. România, vol. XIII [BELDIE & VACZY, 1976] there is given a<br />

subspecies, namely subsp. multifida (Roman) Roman et Beldie.<br />

This last taxa, Cephalaria uralensis (Murray) Roem. et Schult. subsp. multifida<br />

(Roman) Roman et Beldie is worth to be noted, being an endemite in Romania’s flora<br />

(neoendemite), registered in Flora of R. S. România, vol. XIII [BELDIE & VACZY, 1976].<br />

Also, this taxa is included onto the Romanian Red List [OLTEAN & al. 1994].<br />

Unfortunately, this taxa is missing in the Romanian Red Book [DIHORU &<br />

NEGREAN, 2009].<br />

1 University of Agronomical Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 59 Mărăşti Av., 011464, Bucharest – Romania


THE VARIABILITY OF CEPHALARIA URALENSIS (MURRAY) ROEM. ET SCHULT.<br />

Results and discusions<br />

The author of this paper discovered a new taxa in the flora of Dobrudja (South–<br />

East Romania) is presented further on.<br />

Cephalaria uralensis (Murray) Roem. et Schult. subsp. dobrogensis Ciocârlan,<br />

subsp. nova [BARANOV, 1971].<br />

Perennial plant, with a stem of 30-60 cm in height; leaves opposed, penatelysectate,<br />

with 5-8 pairs of lanceolate segments, entirely, small, 0.8-1.2 cm long, decurrents;<br />

head of flowers of 0.8-1 cm in diameter; the outer calyx has pretty smalland uniform teeth;<br />

the achenes are tetragonal, of 4.5-5 mm long, hairy (Fig. 2 – habitus and fruits).<br />

The habitat: this subspecies is growing on dry, rocky places, between 100 and<br />

400 m. s. l.<br />

Spread: Alah-Bair hill (near Băltăgeşti village, Constanţa county) and on the<br />

Pietrosul hill (near Agighiol village, Tulcea county).<br />

Holotypus: in herbarium BUAG – University of Agricultural Sciences, Bucharest,<br />

conservatur also in herbarium I (University “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” of Iaşi, Romania) as<br />

isotypus.<br />

The differential characteristics of this new taxa (subsp. dobrogensis Ciocârlan,<br />

subsp. nova) against the type subspecies (subsp. uralensis) and subsp. multifida (Roman)<br />

Roman et Beldie [ROMAN, 1971], are given in the next dichotomic key of identification:<br />

1a Basal leaves with 2-4 (-5) pairs of entire segments, the terminal one being larger. The<br />

outer calyx has 4 long teeth and other 4 intermediately and very short teeth. ................<br />

....................................................................subsp. uralensis (Fig. 1 - habitus and fruits)<br />

1b Basal leaves with more than 5 pairs of segments. The outer calyx with uniform and<br />

very small teeth ............................................................................................................2<br />

2a Stem of 30-60 cm height; basal leaves with 5-8 pairs of entire segments, smll, 0.8-1<br />

cm long; achenes of 4.5-5 mm long. ....subsp. dobrogensis (Fig. 2 - habitus and fruits)<br />

2b Stem of 50-150 cm height; leaves with 8-12 (-14) pairs of linear segments, lobulately;<br />

achenes to 10 mm long ..........................................................................subsp. multifida<br />

Obs.: Cephalaria uralensis subsp. dobrogensis and C. uralensis subsp. multifida<br />

are morphologically similar to C. media Litv., an endemic species distributed in Caucasus<br />

region [BOBROV, 1957].<br />

References<br />

1. BARANOV A. 1971. Basic latin for plant taxonomists. Cambridge, Mass., USA.<br />

2. BELDIE AL. & VACZY C. 1976. Taxoni noi pentru flora României, In Flora of R. S. România, Cap. 3,<br />

XIII, Bucureşti: Edit. Acad. Române: 35-53.<br />

3. BOBROV E.1957. Fam. Dipsacaceae, In Flora of U. S. S. R. XXIV. Moskva - Leningrad.<br />

4. BORZA AL. 1949. Conspectus Florae Romaniae, f. II, Cluj: Tipografia „Cartea Românească”, 360 pp.<br />

5. DIHORU G. & NEGREAN G. Cartea roşie a plantelor vasculare din România, Edit. Acad. Române,<br />

Bucureşti, 2009, 630 pp.<br />

6. DIKLIĆ N. 1973. Fam. Dipsacaceae in Flore de la Republique Socialiste de Serbie. V. Beograd.<br />

7. FERGUSON I. 1976. Genul Cephalaria, in Flora Europaea, 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />

106


CIOCÂRLAN VASILE<br />

8. OLTEAN M., NEGREAN G., POPESCU A., ROMAN N., DIHORU G., SANDA V., MIHĂILESCU S.<br />

1994. Lista roşie a plantelor superioare din România. Studii, Sinteze, Documentaţii de Ecologie, Acad.<br />

Română – Inst. de Biol., Bucureşti, I, 52 pp.<br />

9. OPREA A. 2005. Lista critică a plantelor vasculare din România. Edit. Univ. “Al. Ioan Cuza” Iaşi, 668 pp.<br />

10. PRODAN I. 1961. Fam. Dipsacaceae, In Flora Republicii Populare Române, VIII. Bucureşti, Edit. Acad.<br />

Române.<br />

11. ROMAN N. 1971. Elemente noi pentru caracterizarea fitogeografică a Porţilor de Fier. Stud. Cerc. Biol., Ser.<br />

Bot., 23(6): 478-484.<br />

107


THE VARIABILITY OF CEPHALARIA URALENSIS (MURRAY) ROEM. ET SCHULT.<br />

Fig. 1. Cephalaria uralensis subsp.<br />

uralensis – plant habitus and fruits<br />

(original)<br />

108<br />

Fig. 2. Cephalaria uralensis subsp.<br />

dobrogensis – plant habitus and fruits<br />

(original)


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 109-116<br />

109<br />

IONIŢA OLGA<br />

PILOSELLA HILL GENUS IN THE BESSARABIA`S FLORA<br />

IONIŢA OLGA 1<br />

Abstract: As a result of floristic and taxonomic investigations of the Pilosella genus within the flora of the<br />

Bessarabia have been established 11 species: P. officinarum F. Schultz et Sch. Bip, P. aurantiaca F.<br />

Schultz et Sch. Bip., P. praealta (Vill ex Gochn.) F. Schultz et Sch. Bip., P. piloselloides (Vill.)<br />

Sojak, P. glaucescens (Bess.) Sojak, P. echioides (Lumn.) F. Schultz et Sch. Bip., P. caespitosa<br />

(Dumort.) P. D. Sell et C. West, P. cymosa (L.) F. Schultz et Sch. Bip, P. lactucela (Wallr.) P. D.<br />

Sell et C. West, P. rojowskii (Rehm.) Schljak. & P. flagellare (Willd.) Arv.-Touv., the last three are<br />

new taxa recently detected for the flora in the study. After chorological analysis, has been concluded<br />

that 6 species are rare. Ecological and biomorfological characteristics of taxa have been established,<br />

the determination key of the Pilosella`s species has been drawn.<br />

Key words: genus Pilosella Hill, Bessarabia´s flora, taxonomy, bioecology, chorology<br />

Introduction<br />

Hieracium L. s. l. being one of the most polymorphic, complicated and bulky<br />

genera of magnoliophyta from the Holarctic flora, is considered nowadays by a large<br />

number of the authors as two separated genera Hieracium L. s. str. and Pilosella Hill<br />

(Asteraceae Dumort. family, Hieraciinae Dumort. subtribe, Cichorieae Lam et DC. tribe).<br />

A number of common morphological features are characteristic for both genera, which<br />

determine the exceptional diversity of the forms and complicate the determination of the<br />

taxa, different modes of reproduction - apomixes (required and optional), amphimixis etc.<br />

are inherent for them. Auto incompatibility is not compulsory and it is possible to form<br />

offspring from cleistogamy [TUPICINA, 2004].<br />

Pilosella genus described by HILL (1756) soon after publication of the Hieracium<br />

genus (Linnaeus, 1753), has not been accepted as an independent generic taxonomic unit<br />

for a long time, but considered as a taxonomic unit with a status of subgenus - Pilosella<br />

[GRAY, 1821] or section – Piloselloidea [KOCH, 1837] within the Hieracium genus<br />

[TUPICINA, 2004]. Among the botanists from the 18-19 century only SCHULTZ &<br />

SCHULTZ-BIPONTINUS (1862) and ARVET-TOUVET (1880) have acknowledged the<br />

existence of Pilosella genus, as separate taxonomic units. The final delimitation of the<br />

Hieracium s. str. and Pilosella Hill. genera was done barely in the second half of the 20th<br />

century as a result of researches and the appearance of works of a number of the botanists<br />

as: SOJÁK (1971), SELL & WEST (1976), DOSTÁL (1984), ŠLẬKOV (1989) and others<br />

[ТIHOMIROV, 2001].<br />

The delimitative criteria are related to the structural features of the generative<br />

organs, in this case of the morphology of the fruit components, which usually manifest<br />

conservative properties more advanced unlike the vegetative organs and is practiced safer<br />

in separating activities of the taxonomic categories [IONIŢA & NEGRU, 2010].<br />

1<br />

<strong>Botanica</strong>l Garden (Institute) of the Academy of Sciences of Moldova, Chişinău – Republic of Moldova,<br />

e-mail: o_ionita@mail.ru


PILOSELLA HILL GENUS IN THE BESSARABIA`S FLORA<br />

The most important characters that separate the Pilosella from the Hieracium<br />

genus are related to the achen structure, are essentially distinctive, that determine us to<br />

accept the separation of species previously assigned to the Hieracium genus from<br />

Bessarabia`s flora.<br />

The Hieracium L. s. str. genus has achenes from 2.5 to 5 mm lengh; ring shaped,<br />

apical with bristles in two series, but the Pilosella Hill genus - 1-2 (2.5) mm lengh, costate;<br />

apical, crenated coronule with bristles in one row.<br />

Material and methods<br />

During floristic investigations as a study material has served both Hieracium L.<br />

collections from <strong>Botanica</strong>l Garden herbarium of ASM and that of the Department of Botany<br />

of the State University of Moldova and our own collections, made during the last years. The<br />

critical analysis of Pilosella species was performed by the classical comparativemorphological<br />

method [KOROVINA, 1996]. The material collected in the field was<br />

hebarized then determined in office conditions, using contemporary floristic literature<br />

[NYARADY, 1965; SELL & WEST, 1976; NEGRU, 2007; GHEIDEMAN, 1986;<br />

ŠLẬKOV, 1989; DOBROCEAEVA & al. 1999] and some basic guidance on the<br />

nomenclature and bioecology of infragenerical taxa [SELL & WEST, 1976;<br />

CEREPANOV, 1995; POPESCU & SANDA, 1998; CIOCÂRLAN, 2009]. General Map of<br />

Bessarabia was taken from: Derev´ja i kustarniki Moldavii [ANDREEV, 1957].<br />

Results and discussions<br />

After the deep consulting of the literature and thorough analysis of the herborized<br />

plants`collections of Pilosella the taxonomic composition, the biomorfological, ecological<br />

and corological features of the species, synonymy and detailed morphological description<br />

have been determined.<br />

Genus PILOSELLA Hill<br />

1756, Brit. Herb.: 441; P. D. Sell a. C. West, 1967, Watsonia, 6, 5: 313. – Hieracium<br />

subgen. Pilosella Tausch, 1828, Flora (Regensb.), 11, 1, Erg.-Bl.: 50. – Hieracium sect.<br />

Piloselloidea Koch, 1844, Syn. Fl. Germ., ed. 2, 2: 509<br />

L e c t o t y p e: P. officinarum F. Schultz et Sch. Bip.<br />

There are thousands of species widespread in the extratropical regions of the<br />

Eurasia (excluding East Asia) and the North Africa [ŠLẬKOV, 1989].<br />

The key to determining species<br />

1a Flowering stem, scapiform (basal rosette leaves only) with an anthodium. Leaves with<br />

dense stellate hairs on the underside .................. P. officinarum F. Schultz et Sch. Bip.<br />

1b Flowering stem (without basal rosette leaves), with 1-4 cauline leaves and 1-3 bracts.<br />

Anthodiums - 2 or more. Leaves without or with few stellate hairs on the underside ...2<br />

2a Ligules deep-orange, turning purplish when dry ...P. aurantiaca F. Schultz et Sch. Bip.<br />

2b Ligules yellow ................................................................................................................3<br />

3a Anthodiums not more than 2-6 (8) .................................................................................4<br />

3b Anthodiums numerous, more than 10 ............................................................................5<br />

110


111<br />

IONIŢA OLGA<br />

4a Basal rosette glaucous, glabrous or with few eglandular hairs on the margin and<br />

median rib. Involucral bracts 5-9 mm ..........P. lactucella (Wallr.) P. D. Sell et C. West<br />

4b Basal rosette with simple eglandular hairs on both surfaces and with stellate hairs on<br />

underside. Involucral bracts 9-12 mm ......................... P. flagellare (Willd.) Arv.-Touv.<br />

5a Stems and leaves glabrous or with rare simple eglandular hairs ....................................6<br />

5b Stems and leaves with numerous simple eglandular hairs or glandular .........................9<br />

6a Stolons get out not only from basal rossete but also from the axils of the lower cauline<br />

leaves ................................................................................. P. rojowskii (Rehm.) Schljak<br />

6b Stolons get out only from basal rossete ..........................................................................7<br />

7a Peduncles with dense stellate hairs P. praealta (Vill ex Gochn.) F. Schultz et Sch. Bip.<br />

7b Peduncles without or with few stellate hairs ..................................................................8<br />

8a Involucral bracts and peduncles without or with few glandular hairs, simple hairs<br />

dispersed ............................................................................ P. piloselloides (Vill.) Sojak<br />

8b Involucral bracts and peduncles with glandular hairs, from dispersed till dense, without<br />

or with occasional simple hairs ..........................................P. glaucescens (Bess.) Sojak<br />

9a Plants with dense, simple rigid hairs, the cauline hairs appressed-ascendent ..................<br />

................................................................... P. echioides (Lumn.) F. Schultz et Sch. Bip.<br />

9b Plants with rigid hairs, very rare, the cauline patent ....................................................10<br />

10a Stolons long .............................................P. caespitosa (Dumort.) P. D. Sell et C. West<br />

10b Stolons absent or short .................................................................................................11<br />

11a Cauline leaves or bracteant ..................................P. cymosa (L.) F. Schultz et Sch. Bip.<br />

11b Cauline leaves or bracteant 5-20 ............... P. echioides (Lumn.) F. Schultz et Sch. Bip.<br />

S e c t i o n 1. Echinina (Naeg. et Peter) Schljak. comb. nova. – Hieracium sect.<br />

Piloselloidea subsect. Echinina Naeg. et Peter, 1885, Hier. Mitt.-Eur. 1: 117.<br />

Steams and leaves hard-bristled, few or numerous cauline leaves. Basal leaves<br />

during flowering usually dry, rarely partially preserved. Ground stolons decumbent absent.<br />

Involucral bracts light green, abundant stellate hairy.<br />

1. P. echioides (Lumn.) F. Schultz et Sch. Bip. 1862, Flora (Regensb.), 45: 431;<br />

Шляков, 1989, Фл. евр. части СССР, 8: 329. – Hieracium echioides Lumn. 1791, Fl.<br />

Poson. 1: 348; Юксип, 1960, Фл. СССР, 30: 418; Гейдеман, 1986, Опред. высш. раст.<br />

МССР: 582; Доброч., Котов, Прокуд., 1999, Опред. высш. раст. Укр.: 380; Negru,<br />

2007, Det. pl. fl. R. Mold.: 270; Ciocârlan, 2009, Fl. Ilus. Rom.: 870. – H. echioides subsp.<br />

echioides; Zahn, 1923, in Engl. Pflanzenreich, 82: 1368; P. D. Sell a C. West, 1976, Fl.<br />

Europ. 4: 375, s. restr.<br />

Hemicryptophyte, grows on dry herbaceous places, sunny hills, rocky coasts,<br />

sands, steppes. Eurasian element; xeromesophyllous, mesothermal, low acid-neutrophilous.<br />

Sporadically in Chilia, South Bugeac, North Bugeac, Gârneţ, Codrii, Rezina, Râşcani and<br />

Briceni geobotanical districts. The species areal includes the Central Europe (the Est), the<br />

Est Europe (excluding the North), the Caucasus, Mediterranean region, Asia, Mongolia,<br />

Iran.<br />

S e c t i o n 2. Praealtina (Gremli) Schljak. comb. nova. – Hieracium subgen.<br />

Pilosella grex Praealtina Gremli, 1878, Excurs.-Fl. Schweiz, ed. 5: 330 (sine dignitate). –<br />

Hieracium subgen. Piloselloidea sect. Praealtina (Gremli) G. Schneid. 1891, in Sagor. u.<br />

G. Schneid. Fl. Centralkarp. 2: 295; Zahn, 1923, in Engl. Pflanzenreich, 82: 1391.<br />

Compact steam, without cavities, with solitary or rare setaceous hairs, till<br />

dispersed, the upper part slightly stellate-tomentose. Leaves blue-green, rough, usually,


PILOSELLA HILL GENUS IN THE BESSARABIA`S FLORA<br />

glabrous, only few thorny thirst on the margins, sometimes with stellate hairs along the<br />

midrib. Inflorescence corymbose, rarely umbellate, consisting of small anthodium.<br />

Involucral bracts lax adherent. Ligules yellow, without red stripes on outer part. Stigmas<br />

yellow.<br />

2. P. praealta (Vill. ex Gochn.) F. Schultz et Sch. Bip. 1862, Flora (Regensb.), 45:<br />

429; Шляков, 1989, Фл. евр. части СССР, 8: 332. – Hieracium praealtum Vill. ex Gochn.<br />

1808, Tent. Pl. Cichor.: 17; Юксип, 1960, Фл. СССР, 30: 441. – H. florentinum All. subsp.<br />

praealtum (Vill. ex Gochn.) Zahn, 1923, in Engl. Pflanzenreich, 82: 1402. – H. praealtum<br />

subsp. praealtum; P. D. Sell a C. West, 1976, Fl. Europ. 4: 371, s. restr.<br />

Hemicryptophyte identified on sunny meadows, glades and forest edges, steppe<br />

slopes (dry), field margins. European element (Mediterranean); xeromesophyllous,<br />

mesothermal, low acid-neutrophilous. Sporadically in the North Bugeac, Gârneţ, Codrii,<br />

Bălţi, Rezina, Râşcani, Briceni and Hotin geobotanical districts. The species areal includes<br />

the East and Central Europe, the Mediterranean region.<br />

3. P. piloselloides (Vill.) Sojak, 1971, Preslia (Praha), 43, 2: 185. – P. aggr.<br />

piloselloides (Vill.) Sojak, Шляков, 1989, Фл. евр. части СССР, 8: 334. – H.<br />

piloselloides Vill. 1779, Prosp. Hist. Pl. Dauph.: 34; Гейдеман, 1986, Опред. высш. раст.<br />

МССР: 584; Доброч., Котов, Прокуд., 1999, Опред. высш. раст. Укр.: 380; Negru,<br />

2007, Det. pl. fl. R. Mold.: 271; Ciocârlan, 2009, Fl. Ilus. Rom.: 870. – H. florentinum All.<br />

grex florentinum Naeg. et Peter, 1885, Hier. Mitt.-Eur. 1: 554, s. l.; Zahn, 1923, in Engl.<br />

Pflanzenreich, 82: 1409. – H. piloselloides subsp. piloselloides; P. D. Sell a C. West, 1976,<br />

Fl. Europ. 4: 371.<br />

Hemicryptophyte, in herbaceous and rocky places met. European element<br />

(Mediterranean); xeromesophyllous, mesothermal, low acid-neutrophilous. Sporadically in<br />

Gârnet, Codrii, Rezina, Bălti and Briceni geobotanical districts. The species areal includes<br />

the East, South and Central Europe, the Caucasus.<br />

4. P. rojowskii (Rehm.) Schljak. comb. nova; Шляков, 1989, Фл. евр. части<br />

СССР, 8: 334. – Hieracium magyaricum Naeg. et Peter subsp. rojowskii Rehm. 1897,<br />

Verh. Zool. Bot. Ges. Wien, 47: 288. – H. bauhinii Bess. subsp. rojowskii (Rehm.) Zahn,<br />

1923, in Engl. Pflanzenreich, 82:1417. – H. praealtum Vill. ex Gochnat subsp. bauhinii<br />

(Bess.) Petunnikov, Sell & West, 1976, Fl. Europ. v. 4, p. 372. – H. rojowskii (Rehm.)<br />

Юксип, 1960, Фл. СССР, 30: 452, s. restr. (sine auct. comb.). – H. rojowskii Rehm.<br />

Доброч., Котов, Прокуд., 1999, Опред. высш. раст. Укр.: 381.<br />

Hemicryptophyte, grows on dry and herbaceous slopes, in rural areas, on wayside.<br />

Continental Eurasian element; xerophyllous, mesothermal, acid-neutrophilous. Rare taxa,<br />

collected from Codrii and Gârnet geobotanical districts (Fig. 1). The species areal includes<br />

the Caucasus, the East and Central Europe, the Mediterranean region.<br />

5. P. glaucescens (Bess.) Sojak, 1971, Preslia (Praha), 43, 2: 185, s. restr.;<br />

Шляков, 1989, Фл. евр. части СССР, 8: 341. – Hieracium glaucescens Bess. 1809, Prim.<br />

Fl. Galic. 2: 149; Юксип, 1960, Фл. СССР, 30: 462; Гейдеман, 1986, Опред. высш. раст.<br />

МССР : 584; Доброч., Котов, Прокуд., 1999, Опред. высш. раст. Укр.: 381; Negru,<br />

2007, Det. pl. fl. R. Mold.: 271. – H. magyaricum subsp. magyaricum; Naeg. et Peter,<br />

1885, Hier. Mitt.-Eur. 1: 576. H. bauhinii Bess. subsp. magyaricum (Naeg. et Peter) Zahn,<br />

1923, in Engl. Pflanzenreich, 82:1421. – H. praealtum Vill. ex Gochnat subsp. thaumasium<br />

(Peter) P. D. Sell, 1976, Fl. Europ. 4: 372.<br />

Hemicriptophyte identified on meadows, dry slopes, forest edge, the edge of fields<br />

and roads. European (mediterranean) element; xerophyllous, mesothermal, acid-<br />

112


113<br />

IONIŢA OLGA<br />

neutrophilous. Rare spread in the Codrii district. Colected only from two localities of the<br />

Hânceşti district: Sărata Galbenă and Bozieni villages (Fig. 1). The species areal includes<br />

the East and the Central Europe, the Mediterranean region (East), the Minor Asia.<br />

S e c t i o n 3. Cymosina (Naeg. et Peter) Schljak. comb. nova. – Hieracium sect.<br />

Piloselloidea subsect. Cymosina Naeg. et Peter, 1885, Hier. Mitt.-Eur. 1: 116, 398. -<br />

Hieracium subgen. Piloselloidea sect. Cymosina G. Schneid. 1891, in Sagor. u. G. Schneid.<br />

Fl. Centralkarp. 2: 292; Zahn, 1923, in Engl. Pflanzenreich, 82: 1149, 1305 (cum auct.<br />

Naeg. et Peter, 1885).<br />

Stem with numerous bristles, on lower part often upward, abundantly stellate<br />

pubescent. Leaves with simple hairs on both surfaces, with stellate hairs on both parts or<br />

only beneath. Cauline leaves 2-4 (7), with glandular hairs often covered on the top.<br />

Inflorescences umbellate or corymbose. Anthodiums numerous; outer involucral bracts<br />

appressed, with simple hairs and often with glandular hairs. Yellow flowers. Stigmas<br />

yellow. Supraterraneous stolons slender.<br />

6. P. cymosa (L.) F. Schultz et Sch. Bip. 1862, Flora (Regensb.), 45: 429;<br />

Шляков, 1989, Фл. евр. части СССР, 8: 344. – Hieracium cymosum L. 1763, Sp. Pl., ed.<br />

2: 1126, p. p.; Юксип, 1960, Фл. СССР, 30: 549, p. p.; Гейдеман, 1986, Опред. высш.<br />

раст. МССР: 584; Доброч., Котов, Прокуд., 1999, Опред. высш. раст. Укр.: 384; Negru,<br />

2007, Det. pl. fl. R. Mold.: 270; Ciocârlan, 2009, Fl. Ilus. Rom.: 870. – H. cymosum subsp.<br />

cymosum Naeg. et Peter, 1885, Hier. Mitt.-Eur. 1: 401; Zahn, 1923, in Engl. Pflanzenreich,<br />

82: 1309; P. D. Sell a C. West, 1976, Fl. Europ. 4: 372, s. restr.<br />

Hemicryptophyte, vegetates on meadows, steppes slopes. Eurasian element;<br />

xeromesophyllous, mesothermal, low acid-neutrophilous. Found sporadically in the North<br />

Bugeac, Gârnet, Codrii, Bălţi, Rezina, Râşcani, Briceni and Hotin districts. The species<br />

areal includes Scandinavia (South), the East and the Central Europe, the Mediterranean<br />

region (East).<br />

S e c t i o n 4. Pratensina (Aschers. et Graebn.) Zahn, 1923, in Engl.<br />

Pflanzenreich, 82: 1148-1149, 1239 (cum auct. Aschers.). – Hieracium sect. Piloselloidea<br />

subsect. Collinina Naeg. et Peter, 1885, Hier. Mitt.-Eur. 1: 116.<br />

Fistulose steam, (1) 2-3 (4) leaves, with distanced simple hairs, horizontally or<br />

patent, disperse stellate-tomentose. Leaves soft, thin, green or yellowish green, sometimes<br />

glaucescent, upper surface with few or without stellate hairs on the ribs, with simple hairs<br />

on the both surfaces. Peduncles stellate-tomentose. Involucres disperse stellate-tomentose,<br />

(5) 7-9 mm length, outer involucral bracts lax adherent. Stigmas dark, sometimes the same<br />

color as the ligules. Ground and underground stolons present.<br />

7. P. caespitosa (Dumort.) P. D. Sell et C. West, 1967, Watsonia, 6, 5: 314, s.<br />

restr.; Шляков, 1989, Фл. евр. части СССР, 8: 349. – H. caespitosum Dumort. 1827, Fl.<br />

Belg.: 27; P. D. Sell a C. West, 1976, Fl. Europ. 4: 373; Гейдеман, 1986, Опред. высш.<br />

раст. МССР: 584; Negru, 2007, Det. pl. fl. R. Mold.: 270; Ciocârlan, 2009, Fl. Ilus. Rom.:<br />

870. – H. pratense Tausch, Юксип, 1960, Фл. СССР, 30: 596. – H. pratense Tausch subsp.<br />

pratense; Zahn, 1923, in Engl. Pflanzenreich, 82: 1269.<br />

Hemicryptophyte identified on the meadows and forest edges. Eurasian element;<br />

mesophyllous, mesotermal, acid-neutrophilous. Rare species in the Codrii, Bălţi, Briceni<br />

and Hotin geobotanical districts (Fig. 1). The species areal includes West Siberia, New<br />

Zealand, the Caucasus (revealed by V. Nicolaev (1989) after one specimen) [TUPICINA,<br />

2004].


PILOSELLA HILL GENUS IN THE BESSARABIA`S FLORA<br />

8. P. aurantiaca (L.) F. Schultz et Sch. Bip. 1862, Flora (Regensb.), 45: 426;<br />

Шляков, 1989, Фл. евр. части СССР, 8: 351.– Hieracium aurantiacum L. 1753, Sp. Pl.:<br />

801; Юксип, 1960, Фл. СССР, 30: 653, p. max. p.; Гейдеман, 1986, Опред. высш. раст.<br />

МССР: 584; Доброч., Котов, Прокуд., 1999, Опред. высш. раст. Укр.: 385; Negru,<br />

2007, Det. pl. fl. R. Mold.: 270; Ciocârlan, 2009, Fl. Ilus. Rom.: 869. – H. aurantiacum<br />

subsp. aurantiacum; Zahn, 1923, in Engl. Pflanzenreich, 82 :1242; P. D. Sell a C. West,<br />

1976, Fl. Europ. 4: 374, s. restr.<br />

Hemicryptophyte, vegetates in the stand glades of oak with birch and oak with<br />

cherry. Eurasian element; mesophyllous, microthermal, low acid-neutrophilous. Rare taxa,<br />

spread only in the Briceni district (Fig. 1). The species areal includes the North and Central<br />

Europe, Balkans; adventive in North America.<br />

S e c t i o n 5. Auriculina (Fries) Schljak. comb. nova. – Hieracium subgen.<br />

Pilosella II. Auriculina Fries, 1862, Uppsala Univ. Årsskr. (Mat.-Nat. – Epicr. Gen. Hier.):<br />

18. - Hieracium subgen. Piloselloidea sect. Auriculina (Fries) G. Schneid. 1891, in Sagor.<br />

u. G. Schneid. Fl. Centralkarp. 2: 284.<br />

Stem 25 (50) cm, slender, usually with 1 leaf, with slender decumbent, glabrous or<br />

glabrescent stolons at the base, with distanced leaflets. Leaves glaucous, spathulate to<br />

linear-lanceolate, with few or without stellate hairs beneath, on the midrib. Inflorescence<br />

(1) 2-6 (8) anthodiums. Involucres 6-8 (9) cm; involucral bracts green or blackish, usually<br />

whitish marginate. Ligules yellow, without red stripes. Stigmas yellow.<br />

Pilosella lactucela (Wallr.) P. D. Sell et C. West<br />

9. P. lactucela (Wallr.)P. D. Sell et C. West, 1967, Watsonia, 6, 5: 314; Шляков,<br />

1989, Фл. евр. части СССР, 8: 355. – Hieracium lactucella Wallr. 1822, Sched. Crit. 1:<br />

408; P. D. Sell a C. West, 1976, Fl. Europ. 4: 369, s. restr.; Ciocârlan, 2009, Fl. Ilus. Rom.:<br />

869. – H. auricula auct. non. L.: Lam. et DC. 1805, Fl. Fr., ed. 3, 4: 24; Юксип, 1960, Фл.<br />

СССР, 30: 670. – H. auricula subsp. auricula auct.: Naeg. et Peter, 1885, Hier. Mitt.-Eur.<br />

1: 189; Zahn, 1923, in Engl. Pflanzenreich, 82: 1198.<br />

Hemicryptophyte, grows on the meadows. European element; mesophyllous,<br />

amphitolerant, acid-neutrophilous. Rare species, registered in Briceni, Codrii and South<br />

Bugeac geobotanical districts (Fig. 1). The species areal includes Scandinavia (South), the<br />

East and South Europe, Atlantic Europe (East) and Mediterranean region (East).<br />

Pilosella flagellare (Willd) Arv.-Touv.<br />

10. P. flagellare (Willd.) Arv.-Touv. 1873, Monogr. Pilos. Hier. Dauph.: 13. - P.<br />

flagellaris (Willd.) Arv.-Touv., Шляков, 1989, Фл. евр. части СССР, 8: 375. – Hieracium<br />

flagellare Willd., Zahn, 1923, in Engl. Pflanzenreich, 82: 1278, pro sp. coll. (= H. pratensepilosella);<br />

Юксип, 1960, Фл. СССР, 30: 643; P. D. Sell a C. West, 1976, Fl. Europ. 4: 369,<br />

pro sp. coll. propr.; Ciocârlan, 2009, Fl. Ilus. Rom.: 869. – H. flagellare (Willd.) Naeg. et<br />

Peter, Доброч., Котов, Прокуд., 1999, Опред. высш. раст. Укр.: 385. – H. flagellare<br />

subsp. petunnikovii Peter, 1893, Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Götting. 2: 74. – H. petunnikovii (Zahn.)<br />

Юксип, 1960, Фл. СССР, 30: 638 (sine auct. comb.).<br />

Hemicryptophyte, identified on meadows, forest edge and glades, dry slopes,<br />

sands. Europen element; xeromesophyllous, mesothermal, acid-neutrophilous. Rare spread<br />

in Briceni, Codrii and Râşcani districts (Fig. 1). The species areal includes Scandinavia<br />

(Finland), the East and the Central Europe.<br />

S e c t i o n 6. Pilosella. Hieracium subgen. Pilosella I. Pilosellina Fries, 1862,<br />

Uppsala Univ. Årsskr. (Mat.-Nat. – Epicr. Gen. Hier.): 10.<br />

114


115<br />

IONIŢA OLGA<br />

Steam scapiform with an anthodium. All leaves basal, with densely stellate hairs<br />

on the underside, sometimes on the top. Involucres with densely stellate hairs. Ligules<br />

yellow, those marginal with red stripes on outer face.<br />

11. P. officinarum F. Schultz et Sch. Bip. 1862, Flora (Regensb.), 45: 421.;<br />

Шляков, 1989, Фл. евр. части СССР, 8: 358. – Hieracium pilosella L. 1753, Sp. Pl.: 800,<br />

p. p.; Zahn, 1923, in Engl. Pflanzenreich, 82: 1158; Юксип, 1960, Фл. СССР, 30: 692; P.<br />

D. Sell a C. West, 1976, Fl. Europ. 4: 368; Гейдеман, 1986, Опред. высш. раст. МССР:<br />

582; Доброч., Котов, Прокуд., 1999, Опред. высш. раст. Укр.: 379; Negru, 2007, Det.<br />

pl. fl. R. Mold.: 270; Ciocârlan, 2009, Fl. Ilus. Rom.: 867. – Pilosella communis Arv.-Touv.<br />

1873, Monogr. Hier. Pilos.: 13.<br />

Hemicryptophyte, grows on herbaceous and sunny places. European element<br />

(Mediterranean); xeromesophyllous, amphitolerant, euryonic. Commune in Chilia,<br />

sporadically in the North Bugeac, Gârneţ, Codrii, Bălţi, Rezina, Râşcani, Briceni and Hotin<br />

districts. The species areal includes Scandinavia, the central and Atlantic Europe (except<br />

the North), the Mediterranean region, Minor Asia, Caucasus, adventive in the North<br />

America, New Zeeland.<br />

Conclusions<br />

� The spontaneous flora of the Bessarabia includes 11 species of the Pilosella: P.<br />

officinarum F. Schultz et Sch. Bip., P. aurantiaca F. Schultz et Sch. Bip., P. praealta<br />

(Vill ex Gochn.) F. Schultz et Sch. Bip., P. piloselloides (Vill.) Sojak, P. glaucescens<br />

(Bess.) Sojak, P. echioides (Lumn.) F. Schultz et Sch. Bip., P. caespitosa (Dumort.) P.<br />

D. Sell et C. West, P. cymosa (L.) F. Schultz et Sch. Bip, P. lactucela (Wallr.) P. D.<br />

Sell et C. West, P. rojowskii (Rehm.) Schljak. and P. flagellare (Willd.) Arv.-Touv.<br />

� Three new species for the flora in the study have been identified: P. lactucela (Wallr.)<br />

P. D. Sell et C. West, P. rojowskii (Rehm.) Schljak. and P. flagellare (Willd.) Arv.<br />

Touv.<br />

� Of all highlighted taxa, 6 are rare: P. aurantiaca F. Schultz et Sch. Bip., P. glaucescens<br />

(Bess.) Sojak, P. caespitosa (Dumort.) P. D. Sell et C. West, P. lactucela (Wallr.) P. D.<br />

Sell et C. West, P. rojowskii (Rehm.) Schljak. and P. flagellare (Willd.) Arv. Touv.<br />

Numerous investigations and inventory in field are necessary further to make possible<br />

the indication of rare degree and endangered status of the mentioned taxa and to<br />

elaborate special measures for their conservation.<br />

References<br />

1. ANDREEV V. 1957. Derev´ja i kustarniki Moldavii. Moskva: Akad. Nauk SSSR: 7-8.<br />

2. ARVET-TOUVET C. 1880. Essal de classification sur les generes Pilosella & Hieracium principalement<br />

pour les espèces et les formes de la region Sud-Ouest de i'Europe, Bull. Soc. Dauph. Échange Pl. Sér. I.<br />

Bull. 7: 278-292.<br />

3. CEREPANOV S. 1995. Sosudistye rasteniâ Rosii i copredel´nyh gosudarstv. Sankt-Peterburg: Мir i sem´â-<br />

95, 990 pp.<br />

4. CIOCÂRLAN V. 2009. Flora ilustrată a României. Bucureşti: Edit. Ceres: 867-880.<br />

5. DOBROČAEVA. D., KOTOV M., PROKUDIN Û. & al. 1999. Opredelitel´ vysših rastenij Ukrainy. Кiеv:<br />

Naukova Dumka: 378-389.<br />

6. DOSTÁL J. 1984. Notes to the nomenclature of the taxa of the Czechoslovac flora. Folla Mus. Rev. Nat.<br />

Bohem. Occld. Bot., 21: 1-22.


PILOSELLA HILL GENUS IN THE BESSARABIA`S FLORA<br />

7. GHEIDEMAN T. 1986. Opredelitel´ vysših rastenij Moldavskoj SSR. Chisinau: Ştiinta: 580-586.<br />

8. IONIŢA O. & NEGRU A. 2010. Specii noi de Pilosella Hill. (Asteraceae Dumort.) din flora Basarabiei.<br />

Akademos, 4(19): 124-126.<br />

9. КOROVINA О. 1986. Мetodičeskie ukazaniâ k sistematike rastenii. Leningrad: VIR, 210 pp.<br />

10. NEGRU A. 2007. Determinator de plante din flora Republicii Moldova. Chişinău: Universul: 270-271.<br />

11. NYARADY E. 1965. Flora Republicii Populare Române. Bucureşti: Edit. Acad. Republicii Populare<br />

Române, 10: 214-750.<br />

12. POPESCU A. & SANDA V. 1998. Conspectul florei cormofitelor spontane din România. Lucrările Grădinii<br />

Botanice. Bucureşti: Edit. Universităţii din Bucureşti. 336 pp.<br />

13. SCHULTZ F. & SCHULTZ-BIPONTINUS C. 1862. Pilosella ais eigene Gattung aufgestellt. Flora<br />

(Regensburg). 27: 417-432; 28: 433-441.<br />

14. SELL P. & WEST C. 1976. Hieracium L. In: Tutin T. G. et al. Flora Europaea. Cambridge: Cambridge<br />

University Press, 4: 358-410.<br />

15. ŠLẬKOV R. 1978. Rod Pilosella Hill. In: Flora evropejscoj časti SSSR. Leningrad: Nauka, 8: 300-377.<br />

16. SOJÁK J. 1971. Přehled československých druhù rodu Pilosella Hill. Preslia, 43(2): 183-186.<br />

17. SOJÁK J. 1971a. Speclerum generis Pilosella Hill combinations novae. Folia Geobot. Phytotax, 6: 217-219.<br />

18. ТIHOMIROV V. 2001. Rod Pilosella Hill vo flore Belarusi. Avtoreferat dissertacii na soiskanie učёnoi<br />

stepeni kandidata biologiceskih nauk. Minsk. 21 pp.<br />

19. TUPICINA N. 2004. Ậstrebinki Sibiri. Novosibirsk: Nauka. 207 pp.<br />

20. ÛKSIP A. 1960. Rod Hieracium L. In: Flora SSSR. Moskva & Leningrad, 30: 732 pp.<br />

Fig. 1. The spread of rare species of Pilosella Hill on the Bessarabia`s territory<br />

116<br />

THE BESSARABIAN<br />

GEOBOTANICAL DISTRICTS<br />

Chilia (Chl)<br />

Bugeacul de Sud (BgS)<br />

Bugeacul de Nord (BgN)<br />

Gârneţ (Gr)<br />

Codrii (Cd)<br />

Rezina (Rz)<br />

Bălţi (Bl)<br />

Râşcani (Rş)<br />

Briceni (Br)<br />

Hotin (Ht)<br />

▲ – Pilosella lactucella<br />

■ – Pilosella rojowskii<br />

● – Pilosella flagellare<br />

► – Pilosella aurantiaca<br />

▼ – Pilosella glaucescens<br />

◄ – Pilosella caespitosa


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 117-120<br />

CANTEMIR VALENTINA, NEGRU ANDREI, STEPHYRTSA ANA<br />

TAXONOMICAL POSITION AND DISTRIBUTION OF BUSCHIA LATERIFLORA<br />

(DC.) OVCZ. (RANUNCULACEAE JUSS.) SPECIES IN THE BESSARABIA<br />

CANTEMIR VALENTINA 1 , NEGRU ANDREI 1 , STEPHYRTSA ANA 1<br />

Abstract: Having the target of taxonomic concretization the Ranunculus L. and Buschia (DC.) Ovcz. genera<br />

from Bessarabia flora, the Herbarium specimens of <strong>Botanica</strong>l Garden Academy of Sciences, and<br />

Moldova State University were investigated and analyzed. Research results attest the priority<br />

concept of Ranunculus L. genus and the presence of Buschia lateriflora (DC.) Ovcz. species in<br />

native flora. Revealing a new habitat for Buschia lateriflora species complete the species area within<br />

South-East Europe limits. Morphologic distinctive criteria of studied genus are given.<br />

Key words: taxonomical position, distribution, Buschia lateriflora (DC.) Ovcz., Bessarabia<br />

Introduction<br />

It is known that from BERNARD DE JUSSIEU (1789) and up to present the<br />

Ranunculaceae family system is constantly exposed to taxonomic treatments and<br />

modifications. For its classification, this family, possessing pronounced and difficult<br />

heterobatmy, is the subject of a comprehensive study concerning to all methods of modern<br />

taxonomy. However, up to date, a perfect system of classification of this family is absent.<br />

According to A. Takhtajan’s phylogenetic system [TAKHTAJAN, 1987], the<br />

Ranunculaceae family is divided into 6 subfamilies: Coptidoideae (phylogenetically, the<br />

most archaic and primitive), Thalictroideae (including Isopyroideae), Anemonoideae,<br />

Ranunculoideae, Delphinioideae, Hellebroideae. The Ranunculoideae subfamily, where is<br />

includes the Ranunculus genus (including Buschia), numbers 21 genera.<br />

Analyzing the data referring the Ranunculus L. genus for the monograph “Flora of<br />

Bessarabia”, we deviated from the traditional classification system on above-mentioned<br />

genus, following the N. Tsvelev’s opinion [TSVELEV, 2001] in assessing the systematic<br />

value of taxa at the level of genus. We are considering really and more adequate such<br />

treatment of the volume “in sensu stricto” and the delimitation within the Ranunculoideae<br />

subfamily of the Ranunculus L., Ficaria Guett., Batrachium (DC.) S.F. Gray,<br />

Ceratocephala Moench, Buschia Ovcz. genera, earlier and at present recognized by us,<br />

confirmed in the limits of the Bessarabian territory.<br />

Material and methods<br />

As biological material for investigations the Herbarium of <strong>Botanica</strong>l Garden<br />

(Institute) and, Moldova State University exsiccates were served. The basic methodical<br />

recommendations [KOROVINA, 1986] were used, for performing the expedition and<br />

cameral studies. The taxa nomenclature at the level of family, genus and species was taken<br />

1 <strong>Botanica</strong>l Garden of the Moldova Academy of Sciences, Pădurii str., no. 18, 2002, Chişinău – Republic of<br />

Moldova, e-mail: v_cantemir@yahoo.com; andrei.negru1@gmail.com; ana_sterirta39@yahoo.com<br />

117


TAXONOMICAL POSITION AND DISTRIBUTION OF BUSCHIA LATERIFLORA (DC.) OVCZ. …<br />

from the fundamental published works by [CEREPANOV, 1995; TUTIN & al. 1993-2006]<br />

and, the bioecological peculiarities of species are exposed [POPESCU & SANDA, 1998].<br />

Results and discussions<br />

The formal system of Ranunculus L. s. l. genus includes a great biodiversity of<br />

species (over 600) that distinguish themselves both by distinctive morphologic criteria and,<br />

geographic localization. The morphologic non-homogeneity of species of given genus<br />

induced the systematic investigators’ to such attempts of dividing this genus into a number<br />

of generic taxa.<br />

According to Ovczinikov’s [OVCZINIKOV, 1940] opinion, scientist-taxonomist,<br />

Prantl’s introduction (1876) in taxonomic composition of Ranunculus genus the R.<br />

lateriflorus DC. and R. nodiflorus L. species is considered unjustified. These species, based<br />

on comparative analysis of their morpho-structural peculiarities, could not be assigned to<br />

any sections of the genus Ranunculus. The distinctions being rather evident, the author,<br />

analyzing the Ranunculaceae family for the USSR Flora, includes these two taxons in the<br />

Micranthus Ovcz. subgenus (OVCZINIKOV, 1937). Later on, OVCZINIKOV (1940)<br />

combines both species into Buschia Ovcz. new genus.<br />

Tab. 1. Morphological distinctive criteria of the Ranunculus and Buschia genera.<br />

Genus/Criterion Buschia Ranunculus<br />

Calyx structure Perigon (petaloid, deciduous) Perianth (bicalyculate)<br />

Flower position<br />

Sessile, axillary in the<br />

dichotomies stem<br />

Flowers are not axillary,<br />

sessile<br />

Honey-leaves<br />

Reduced, elongated, spoonshaped<br />

Honey-leaves of another type<br />

(sessile)<br />

Stem branched Dichotomous – dichasial<br />

Differentiation of the<br />

inflorescence from the<br />

vegetative part<br />

Lack of differentiation in the<br />

upper part to separate from the<br />

vegetative part of the<br />

inflorescence<br />

Cauline ramification of<br />

another type<br />

Presence of inflorescence and<br />

of vegetative part<br />

From the ecological point of view Buschia genus prefers the humid and swampy<br />

habitats (biotopes), sometimes halophilous; it is also identified in water surfaces forming a<br />

number of ecological modifications. The terrestrial forms are small (4-13 cm), branched<br />

from the base with short internodes; the aquatic forms (Ranunculus lateriflorus form natans<br />

Gluck) are high, achieving to 15-20 cm, subramose, with long internodes and narrow<br />

leaves. Among these forms there are crossing varieties.<br />

The investigation of exsiccates, existent in the Herbarium of the <strong>Botanica</strong>l Garden<br />

Academy of Sciences of Moldova concerning the Ranunculus genus permitted the revealing<br />

of an exsiccate, collected by Zelenetskij N. and identified initially as Ranunculus nodiflorus<br />

L. (the South of Bessarabia, Tatarbunar, on the alkaline soils) [ZELENETSKIJ, 1891].<br />

Later on, V. Lipskij in 1892 reviewing Zelenetskij’s herbarium, collected from the South of<br />

Bessarabia, determined this sample as R. lateriflorus DC. We confirm the correctness of<br />

this species identification. With the purpose of discovering the new places of growth of the<br />

118


CANTEMIR VALENTINA, NEGRU ANDREI, STEPHYRTSA ANA<br />

species Buschia lateriflora (DC) Ovcz. within Bessarabia’s limits, new additional<br />

expedition studies are necessary.<br />

Genus Buschia Ovcz.<br />

1940, Bot. journal. 25, 4-5: 339. - Ranunculus L. subgen. Micranthus Ovcz. 1937, USSR<br />

Flora, 7: 474<br />

Annual herbs, erect or ascending. Stems dichotomous branched. Basal alternatelyleaved,<br />

complete, ovate-oblong, long-petiolate, those superior are opposed, short-petiolate,<br />

oblong-lanceolate, rarely dentate. Very small flowers, achieves to 2,0-3,0 mm in diameter,<br />

those superior are 2-3, sessile, disposed in the axil of the branches, with an opposite<br />

bracteate’s foliole. Perigon petal-shaped; tepals 5(4), yellow, partially bi-symphpetalous,<br />

deciduous. Honey-leaves 3-5, membranous, candicant, spoon-shaped, sometimes very<br />

reduced, nectariferous foveole at the base, covered with a semicircular squama<br />

(rudimentary leaf), free in the superior part. Stamens 4–7, anthers small, orbiculated.<br />

Apocarpous gynoecium, numbers 3–10 uniovulate carpels. Receptacle glabrous. Relative<br />

numerous fruit (6-25) dispose in globulous cephalodium, granular-tuberculated, beak<br />

slightly dilated at the base, a little elongated (B. lateriflora) or short (B. nodiflora).<br />

Typus generis: Buschia lateriflora (DC.) Ovcz. (Ranunculus lateriflorus DC.).<br />

Species type of the genus in the native flora of Bessarabia is identified.<br />

The genus includes 2-4 species, sporadic spread in the South-East Europe, in<br />

Mediterranean region (including, Northern Africa), Caucasus, Crimea, the inferior stream<br />

of Volga river, the Northern part of the Middle Asia.<br />

Buschia lateriflora (DC.) Ovcz. 1940, Бот. журн. 25, 4-5: 339; Доброч. и др.<br />

1999, Опред. высш. раст. Украины: 52; Цвелев, 2001, Фл. Вост. Европы, X: 159. –<br />

Ranunculus lateriflorus DC. 1817, Reg. Veg. Syst. Nat. 1: 251; Овч. 1937, Фл. СССР, 7:<br />

474; Tutin, 1964, Fl. Europ. 1: 236; Tutin et Akeroyd, 1993, Fl. Europ., ed. 2, 1: 284.<br />

Ciocârlan, 2009, Fl. Ilustr. a Rom.: 169. – Fig. 1.<br />

Plants are of 4-15 (25) cm, glabrous. Stems dichotomic ramified. Basal leaves ovate<br />

or oval elliptical, complete or dentate, long-petiolate, lamina of 12-20 (25) x 5-8 (10) mm.<br />

Leaves caulinary elongated-lanceolate, rarely dentate, and short-petiolate. Flowers of 2.4–3.0<br />

mm in diameter, sessile or subsessile, axillary in the dichotomies of the stem, in the superior<br />

part 2–3. Sepals 5, petal-shaped, membranous, elongated-elliptical, yellowish, deciduous.<br />

Honey-leaves 3, rarely 2, reduced, elongated spoon-shaped. Androecium of 4-5 stamens,<br />

anthers suborbicular. Receptacle conic, glabrous. Achenes achieve 2.8–3.3 mm, ovate-pearshaped,<br />

brown, granular-tuberculated on the margins, beak of 1.0–1.3 mm. 2n=16.<br />

Annual terofite, blooming in April-May, vegetates on sandy-place, humid, alkaline<br />

soil, river meadows temporary flooded.<br />

Element eurasiatic (mediterranean), mesophyte (hygrophyte) species, halophilous,<br />

mesotherm, prefers soils with neutral-alkaline reaction. The species area covers continental<br />

Eurasia and North Africa. In the flora of Bessarabia it vegetates in the southern part of the<br />

territory (the steppe by Stipa L. with Festuca L. districts, on the alkaline soils, southern<br />

Budgeac).<br />

119


TAXONOMICAL POSITION AND DISTRIBUTION OF BUSCHIA LATERIFLORA (DC.) OVCZ. …<br />

Fig. 1. Buschia lateriflora (DC) Ovcz. (after P. N. Ovczinikov).<br />

a – general view; b – flower; c – nectary; d – achene; e – apical part of flowering shoots.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The study and the analysis of the herbarized material confirm the presence of the<br />

Buschia lateriflora (DC) Ovcz. species in the Bessarabia’s flora.<br />

The discovery of this habitat Buschia lateriflora completes the species area in the<br />

South-East Europe limits.<br />

Buschia lateriflora represents a native floristic element (not adventive), spread<br />

rarely in the Bessarabia’s limits and requires further research.<br />

References<br />

1. CEREPANOV S. K. 1995. Sosudistye rastenija Rossii i sopredel´nyh gosudarstv. Sanct-Peterburg, 990 pp.<br />

2. КОROVINA О. N. 1986. Metodiceskie ucazania c sistematike rastenii. Leningrad, 210 pp.<br />

3. OVCZINIKOV P. N. 1937. Ljutiki (Ranunculus) flory SSSR. V: V. L. KOMAROV Flora SSSR. Leningrad,<br />

7: 477.<br />

4. OVCZINIKOV P. N. 1940. Buschia - novyj rod semejstva ljuticovyh (Ranunculaceae). V: Botaniceskii<br />

jurnal SSSR. Leningrad. 25(4-5): 334-340.<br />

5. POPESCU A. & SANDA V. 1998. Conspectul florei cormofitelor spontane din Romania. Acta <strong>Botanica</strong><br />

Horti Bucurestiensis. Lucrarile Gradinii Botanice. Edit. Univ. din Bucuresti, 336 pp.<br />

6. TAKHTAJAN A. L. 1987. Sistema Magnoliofitov. Leningrad, 439 pp.<br />

7. TUTIN T. G. & al. (asisted by J. R. AKEROYD & M. E. NEWTON). 1993-2006. Flora Europaea. 1-5, 2 nd<br />

ed., Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.<br />

8. TSVELEV N. N. 2001. Rod Buschia Ovcz. V: N. N. TSVELEV (Pod red.). Flora Vostočnoi Evropy. Sanct-<br />

Peterburg, X: 159-160.<br />

9. ZELENETSKIJ N. 1891. Otčot o botaničeskih issledovanijah Bessarabskoj gubernii (Uezdy Benderskij,<br />

Akkermanskij i Izmail´skij). Odessa, Izd. Bessarabskoj Gubernskoj Upravy, 95 pp.<br />

120


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 121-134<br />

SÎRBU CULIŢĂ, OPREA ADRIAN, ELIÁŠ PAVOL jun., FERUS PETER<br />

NEW CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF ALIEN FLORA IN<br />

ROMANIA<br />

SÎRBU CULIŢĂ 1 , OPREA ADRIAN 2 , ELIÁŠ PAVOL jun. 3 , FERUS PETER 4<br />

Abstract: In this paper, a number of seventeen alien plant species are presented, one of them being now for the<br />

first time reported in Romania (Sedum sarmentosum Bunge). Some species are mentioned for the first<br />

time in the flora of Moldavia (Aster novae-angliae L., Cenchrus incertus M. A. Curtis, Chenopodium<br />

pumilio R. Br., Fraxinus americana L., Lindernia dubia (L.) Pennell, Petunia × atkinsiana D. Don,<br />

Solidago gigantea Aiton, Tagetes erecta L.) or Transylvania (Kochia sieversiana (Pallas) C. A. Mey.),<br />

and some are reported from new localities (seven species). For each species, there are presented<br />

general data on the geographical origin, its distribution in Europe and worldwide, as well as its<br />

invasion history and current distribution in Romania. Some of these species manifest a remarkable<br />

spreading tendency, expanding their invasion area in Romania. Voucher specimens were deposited in<br />

the Herbarium of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Iaşi (IASI).<br />

Keywords: alien plants, flora, new records, Romania<br />

Introduction<br />

According to ANASTASIU & NEGREAN (2005), the alien flora of Romania<br />

includes 435 species, of which 88.3% are neophytes and 11.7% are archaeophytes.<br />

Therefore, species of alien origin currently represent ca 13% of the total flora of the<br />

country, which was estimated by CIOCÂRLAN (2009) to 3335 species. In the last years<br />

there is a continuous enrichment of Romania’s flora with new alien plant species<br />

[ANASTASIU & NEGREAN, 2008; OPREA & SÎRBU, 2010; SÎRBU & OPREA, 2011].<br />

Some of these alien species can become invasive, threatening natural and<br />

agricultural ecosystems, causing damages to the economy and human health [PIMENTEL &<br />

al. 2000; McNEELY, 2001; WITTENBERG & COCK, 2001]. All signatories to the<br />

Convention on Biological Diversity, including Romania, are obliged to prevent the<br />

introduction of, control, or eradicate those alien species which threaten ecosystems, habitats<br />

or species [WITTENBERG, 2005]. Reporting those newly alien species arrived in Romania’s<br />

flora, and monitoring the spreading of those previously reported, can be useful tools in<br />

establishing measures in order to eradicate them before become invasive and harmful.<br />

In the present paper we report a new alien species for the flora of Romania, as well<br />

as other new or rare alien species for the flora of Moldavia and Transylvania, some of<br />

which have an invasive character.<br />

1<br />

University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Iaşi, Faculty of Agriculture, 3, Mihail Sadoveanu<br />

Alley, Iaşi – Romania, e-mail: culita69@yahoo.com<br />

2<br />

“Anastasie Fătu” <strong>Botanica</strong>l Garden, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University, 7-9 Dumbrava Roşie St., 700487, Iaşi –<br />

Romania<br />

3<br />

Slovak Agricultural University, Faculty of Agrifood Resources, Nitra – Slovakia<br />

4<br />

Arboretum Mlynany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Vieska nad Zitavou – Slovakia<br />

121


NEW CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF ALIEN FLORA IN ROMANIA<br />

Materials and methods<br />

All the species in this paper were recorded during our recent field works on alien<br />

plants, in the historical provinces Moldavia and Transylvania (Romania). The geographic<br />

coordinates were recorded using eTrex Legend HCx GPS system. Voucher specimens were<br />

deposited in the Herbarium of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine<br />

Iaşi (IASI). Morphological characters of species were analyzed on the specimens collected<br />

from the field and compared with the data from relevant literature sources [TUTIN & al.<br />

1964-1980, 1993; KUNJUN & OHBA, 2001; CIOCÂRLAN, 2009; OHBA, 2009]. The<br />

taxonomy and nomenclature of species follow Flora Europaea [TUTIN & al. 1964-1980,<br />

1993], except Sedum sarmentosum Bunge [KUNJUN & OHBA, 2001; OHBA, 2009].<br />

Terminology and definitions recommended by RICHARDSON & al. (2000) and PYŠEK &<br />

al. (2004) were used for the status of alien plants.<br />

Results & discussions<br />

During our recent field investigations, focused on alien plants in Moldavia and<br />

Transylvania (2010), we recorded a new alien plant species for the flora of Romania<br />

(Sedum sarmentosum Bunge), several new alien species for the flora of Moldavia (e. g.<br />

Aster novae-angliae L., Cenchrus incertus M. A. Curtis, Chenopodium pumilio R. Br.,<br />

Fraxinus americana L., Lindernia dubia (L.) Pennell, Petunia × atkinsiana D. Don,<br />

Solidago gigantea Aiton, Tagetes erecta L.) or Transylvania (e. g. Kochia sieversiana<br />

(Pallas) C. A. Mey.), and other species identified in new localities, some of them with an<br />

invasive character (e. g. Brachyactis ciliata (Ledeb.) Ledeb., Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.,<br />

Euphorbia dentata Michx., Grindelia squarrosa (Pursh) Dunal., Impatiens parviflora DC.,<br />

Sicyos angulatus L.).<br />

a) New records in the alien flora of Romania<br />

Sedum sarmentosum Bunge<br />

A species native to Eastern Asia (China) [KUNJUN & OHBA, 2001], cultivated<br />

for ornamental purposes and naturalized in Japan [MÜLLER & OKUDA, 1998], North<br />

America [OHBA, 2009], as well as in numerous European countries, such as: Spain<br />

[CASTROVIEJO, 1995], Montenegro [STEŠEVIĆ & al. 2008], Slovenia [JOGAN & al.<br />

1995], Czech Republic [PYŠEK & al. 2002], Switzerland [WITTEMBERG, 2005],<br />

Belgium [VERLOOVE, 2006], Hungary (casual) [BALOGH & al. 2004], Croatia<br />

[ŠEGULJA & REGULA BEVILACQUA, 1994], Austria [FISCHER & al. 2008],<br />

Germany, Italy and Slovakia [MARHOLD, 2011].<br />

In Romania, this species was recently found in Mediaş town (Sibiu county), on a<br />

platform of a concrete channel, along the Henri Coandă street (46º09′59.32′′N;<br />

24º21′37.50′′E; leg. Eliáš P. jun., Oprea A., Sîrbu C., Ferus P., 2011 August 18) (Fig. 1).<br />

On that place, this species grow abundantly, forming mono-specific and compact clumps,<br />

presumably by vegetative reproduction.<br />

We do not know the introduction date of this species into Romania. None of the<br />

floristic papers in Romania, either older [BAUMGARTEN, 1816; SCHUR, 1866; FUSS,<br />

1866; SIMONKAI, 1886; KANITZ, 1879-1881; BRÂNDZĂ, 1879-1883; GRECESCU,<br />

122


SÎRBU CULIŢĂ, OPREA ADRIAN, ELIÁŠ PAVOL jun., FERUS PETER<br />

1898; PRODAN, 1939; BORZA, 1947], or more recent [RĂVĂRUŢ, in SĂVULESCU,<br />

1956; BELDIE, 1977; OPREA, 2005; CIOCÂRLAN, 2009] does not mention it. Its<br />

morphological characters, based on the study of herbarium specimens, in agreement with<br />

the data from relevant literature sources [KUNJUN & OHBA, 2001; OHBA, 2009], are<br />

presented below.<br />

S. sarmentosum is a perennial herb, glabrous, with stems creeping and ascending,<br />

branched, rooting at nodes, 10-25 cm; leaves 3-verticillate, sessile; blade pale yellowish -<br />

green, 10-25 × 4-6 mm, base abruptly narrowed, spurred, apex subacute; cyme<br />

corymbiform, bracts similar to leaves, smaller; flowers ± sessile, 5-merous; sepals<br />

lanceolate to oblong, 3.5-5 mm, green, apex acute to obtuse; petals yellow, lanceolate to<br />

oblong, 5-8 mm, apex long-mucronate; stamens 10, shorter than petals; carpels 5, distinct,<br />

oblong, 5-6 mm. Fruit polyfollicle.<br />

S. sarmentosum is a polyploid species (2n = ca 72) [OHBA, 2009], blooming in<br />

May-June and fruiting in August [KUNJUN & OHBA, 2001; FISCHER & al. 2008]. The<br />

actively clonal reproduction allows it to maintain populations even when no seeds are<br />

formed (Croatia) [ŠEGULJA & REGULA BEVILACQUA, 1994]. Into the natural range,<br />

this species prefers rocky and shaded fields, up to the altitude of 1600 m [KUNJUN &<br />

OHBA, 2001]. In North America it is reported on dry rocks, between 0 and 500 m altitudes<br />

[OHBA, 2009]. In Croatia, it grows on sandy or rocky anthropogenic grounds and on old<br />

walls, where it can form almost pure stands [ŠEGULJA & REGULA BEVILACQUA,<br />

1994]. In addition to its use as an ornamental plant, S. sarmentosum is indicated in folk<br />

medicine, e.g. in chronic viral hepatitis [HE & al. 1998], or as a vegetable [KUNJUN &<br />

OHBA, 2001].<br />

b) New records in the alien flora of Moldavia<br />

Aster novae-angliae L. (Symphyotrichum novae-angliae (L.) G. L. Nesom)<br />

It is a species native to North America [FEHÉR, 2008], introduced in Europe as an<br />

ornamental plant, and naturalized in many regions [TAMAMSCHJAN, 1999/1959; YEO,<br />

in TUTIN & al. 1976]. In Romania, it is also cultivated in gardens [MORARIU &<br />

NYÁRÁDY, in SĂVULESCU, 1964], from where it sometimes escapes and spreads freely:<br />

Banat [ARVAT, 1977] and Muntenia [NEGREAN, 1972]. It was also found in Moldavia,<br />

in Iaşi city, on a vacant land, near the railway, ca 500 m, westward of the railway station<br />

(47º10′13.16′′N; 27º33′36.60′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., 2010 October 12), where it grows into a<br />

phytocoenosis dominated by Elymus repens.<br />

Cenchrus incertus M. A. Curtis<br />

Species native to North and Central America [HITCHCOCK, 1950;<br />

SZIGETVÁRI, 2008], and naturalized in Southern, Central and Eastern Europe<br />

[CLAYTON, in TUTIN & al. 1980; SZIGETVÁRI, 2008; DAISIE, 2011]. In Romania it<br />

was relatively recent reported [CIOCÂRLAN & al. 1991], along the Black Sea littoral, in<br />

Vama Veche and subsequently in other localities from Dobrudja [CIOCÂRLAN, 2000;<br />

CIOCÂRLAN & al. 2004; OPREA, 2005]. In Moldavia, a small population of C. incertus<br />

has been identified at Galaţi railway station (45º26′38.09′′N; 28º03′41.94′′E; leg. Sîrbu C.,<br />

Oprea A., Eliáš P. jun., Ferus P., 2011 August 20). It seems to be now a species on the way<br />

of spreading in Romania.<br />

123


NEW CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF ALIEN FLORA IN ROMANIA<br />

Chenopodium pumilio R. Br.<br />

This is a species originating in tropical regions, unintentionally introduced in<br />

Europe by importing wool from Australia [AELLEN, 1979, cited by CHYTRY, 1993]. In<br />

Romania, it was first mentioned by CHYTRY (1993) (leg. 1989) and COSTEA (1994),<br />

from the Danube Delta, on sandy river banks influenced by the human activities. In other<br />

areas it also grows on ruderal grounds, railway stations, and river banks [CHYTRY, 1993].<br />

According to CHYTRY (1993), due to high capacity for dissemination and long viability of<br />

seeds, the species is expected to further spread in South-Eastern Europe. Indeed, we<br />

recently found it in other localities from the Danube Delta (e. g. Crişan, Sulina, Maliuc and<br />

Caraorman), but also in Southern part of Moldavia, on the left bank of the Danube river, in<br />

Galaţi town (between 45º25′06.11′′N; 28º02′07.82′′E and 45º26′11.75′′N; 28º04′43.43′′E;<br />

leg. Sîrbu C., Oprea A.; 2011 August 02), and at Cotul Pisicii (45º25′10.27′′N;<br />

28º11′17.09′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., Oprea A., Eliáš P. jun., Ferus P.; 2011 August 20).<br />

Fraxinus americana L.<br />

This is one of the most common ash species in North America [GRIFFITH, 1991],<br />

introduced in Europe at 1724 [CSISZÁR & BARTHA, 2008], and now occasionally<br />

reported as sub-spontaneous tree in France, Bulgaria, Hungary and Lithuania [DAISIE,<br />

2011]. In Romania it is cultivated as isolated trees in parks, along the streets and in forest<br />

plantations [DUMITRIU-TĂTĂRANU, 1960; MORARIU, in SĂVULESCU, 1961]. As a<br />

sub-spontaneous plant, this ash species was previously reported in Dobrudja, at Mamaia (on<br />

the Tăbăcărie lakesides) [FĂGĂRAŞ & al. 2008]. We also have identified this species, as<br />

sub-spontaneous, in Galaţi county, at Tirighina-Barboşi railway yard (45º24′07.13′′N;<br />

27º58′14.96′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., Oprea A., 2011 August 02), Şendreni (near the road;<br />

45º25′12.26′′N; 27º53′48.45′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., Oprea A., 2011 August 02) and Galaţi (near<br />

the railway station; 45º26′26.68′′N; 28º04′00.85′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., Oprea A., Eliáš P. jun.,<br />

Ferus P., 2011 August 20).<br />

Lindernia dubia (L.) Pennell<br />

Species originating in North and South America, naturalized in a large part of<br />

South-Western Europe [WEBB & PHILCOX, IN TUTIN & al. 1972]. In Romania it was<br />

previously reported by CIOCÂRLAN & COSTEA (1994), on wet alluvia from the Danube<br />

Delta – Sacalin Island, towards the Sfântul Gheorghe distributary channel, and,<br />

subsequently, it was also mentioned from Chilia Veche and Periprava [CIOCÂRLAN,<br />

1994, 2009]. We found this species along the Sulina distributary channel, at Mila 28 (West<br />

of Maliuc) (45º10′19.63′′N; 29º02′56.96′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., Oprea A., 2011 August 03), at<br />

Crişan (45º10′32.71′′N; 29º23′06.52′′E; leg. Oprea A., 2011 September 15), as well as in<br />

the city of Galaţi, on the left bank of Danube river (45º25′33.22′′N; 28º02′55.32′′E; leg.<br />

Sîrbu C., Oprea A., 2011 August 02).<br />

Petunia × atkinsiana D. Don (=P. axillaris (Lam.) Britton, Sterns et Pogg. × P.<br />

integrifolia (Hook.) Schinz & Thell.; P. hybrida Vilm.)<br />

Ornamental plant of hybrid origin, which was obtained from crosses between P.<br />

axillaris and P. integrifolia, in the second half of the nineteenth century [GUYOT, 1961].<br />

Occasionally, it was reported as a refugee from the gardens in some countries from Central,<br />

Western and Southern Europe [DAISIE, 2011]. In Romania, it was introduced, probably,<br />

124


SÎRBU CULIŢĂ, OPREA ADRIAN, ELIÁŠ PAVOL jun., FERUS PETER<br />

towards the end of the nineteen century, now being widely cultivated as an ornamental<br />

plant. It was occasionally reported as a plant escaped from gardens, in several localities<br />

from Transylvania [BORZA, 1959] and Dobrudja [HOREANU, 1975; FĂGĂRAŞ & al.<br />

2008]. We also found it on vacant lands or roadsides, in many localities in Southern<br />

Moldavia (Galaţi county): Fârţăneşti (45º47′06.06′′N; 27º58′54.76′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., Oprea<br />

A., 2011 July 31), Tg. Bujor (45º52′27.05′′N; 27º55′33.23′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., Oprea A., 2011<br />

July 31), Galaţi (45º24′46.41′′N; 28º01′46.88′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., Oprea A., 2011 August 02),<br />

Hanu Conachi (45º34′54.15′′N; 28º35′42.14′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., Oprea A., 2011 August 02),<br />

Costache Negri (45º42′02.03′′N; 27º43′00.15′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., Oprea A., 2011 August 02),<br />

Cudalbi (45º46′16.16′′N; 27º41′11.46′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., Oprea A., 2011 August 02), Pechea<br />

(45º37′20.24′′N; 27º48′00.82′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., Oprea A., 2011 August 02).<br />

Solidago gigantea Aiton (S. serotina Aiton; S. gigantea subsp. serotina (Kuntze)<br />

McNeill)<br />

Species native to North America (United States and Canada) [BRITTON &<br />

BROWN, 1970], from where it was introduced in Europe, as an ornamental plant, in 1758<br />

(London) [JAKOBS & al. 2004; WITTENBERG, 2005; WEBER & JAKOBS, 2005].<br />

Although the first naturalized populations in Europe were recorded shortly after its<br />

introduction, the plant has been spread throughout the continent mainly after the year of<br />

1850 [WEBER & JAKOBS, 2005]. Nowadays, it is widespread in almost all european<br />

countries, between 42ºN and 63°N [MCNEILL, in TUTIN & al. 1976; WEBER &<br />

JAKOBS, 2005]. In Romania, according to MORARIU & NYÁRÁDY, in SĂVULESCU<br />

(1964), S. gigantea was firstly published by SCHUR (1866), on the river meadows between<br />

Avrig and Bradu (Transylvania). This is, however, an erroneous information, because the<br />

species indicated by SCHUR (1866) is S. canadensis, and not S. gigantea. Therefore,<br />

probably, the first indication of this species in Romania remains that made by BORBAS<br />

(1886), cited by MORARIU & NYÁRÁDY, in SĂVULESCU (1964), which mentioned S.<br />

gigantea from Lipova (Arad county). In the last century the species has also been<br />

mentioned on the Danube river meadows and Danube Delta [PRODAN, 1935-1939, 1939],<br />

as well as from Transylvania, Maramureş, Banat and Oltenia [BORZA, 1947; MORARIU<br />

& NYÁRÁDY, in SĂVULESCU, 1964; ŞTEFUREAC & al. 1971; ROMAN, 1974;<br />

DIHORU & al. 1968-1970]. In Moldavia, it has been previously known only from gardens.<br />

As a sub-spontaneous plant, it was recently found in the following localities: Fundu<br />

Moldovei (on the left bank of the Moldova river; leg. Sîrbu C., 2006 July 25), between<br />

Pojorâta and Sadova (the left bank of the Moldavia river; 47º32′01.79′′N; 25º29′32.36′′E;<br />

leg. Sîrbu C., 2011 September 01) (Suceava county), as well as in Răducăneni (the left bank<br />

of the Bohotin river; 46º57′37.32′′N; 27º56′34.69′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., Oprea A., 2011<br />

September 11) (Iaşi county). Currently, we can state that in Romania, this species is quite<br />

common (invasive) on the river meadows in Transylvania, Crişana, Maramureş, and Banat,<br />

but it is still rather rare in the other provinces of the country.<br />

Tagetes erecta L.<br />

Species native to Central America (Mexico), from where it was introduced into<br />

Central Europe, in the 1573 [NYÁRÁDY, in SĂVULESCU, 1964; GUYOT, 1961], for<br />

ornamental use. Today, it is reported as a casual alien plant from many european countries<br />

[GUYOT, 1961; ESSL & RABITSCH, 2002; MOSYAKIN & YAVORSKA, 2002;<br />

125


NEW CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF ALIEN FLORA IN ROMANIA<br />

PYŠEK & al. 2002; BALOGH & al. 2004; VERLOOVE, 2006; DAISIE, 2011]. In<br />

Romania, it was listed as a garden plant, starting from the 19 th century [SZABO, 1841;<br />

PORCIUS, 1885; BRÂNDZĂ, 1879-1883; SIMONKAI, 1886; GRECESCU, 1898].<br />

According to DIACONESCU (1961) and ANASTASIU (1994), it is naturalized in<br />

Bucharest (in the <strong>Botanica</strong>l Garden). We have found it as a sub-spontaneous plant (escaped<br />

from gardens) in Horleşti-Rediu, on a ruderal place (leg. Sîrbu C., 2006 September 03) (Iaşi<br />

county), Fundu Moldovei (on the left bank of the Moldova river; leg. Sîrbu C., 2006 July<br />

25) (Suceava county), as well as at Crişan (Danube Delta) (45º10′25.41′′N; 29º23′33.67′′E;<br />

leg. Oprea A., 2011 September 15).<br />

c) New record in the alien flora of Transylvania<br />

Kochia sieversiana (Pallas) C. A. Mey. (Bassia sieversiana (Pallas) W. A. Weber;<br />

K. scoparia var. sieversiana Graebn.; K. densiflora Turkz. in DC.; K. scoparia var.<br />

densiflora Moq. in DC.).<br />

A species originating in Central Asia and Siberia [ILJIN, 1970/1936], first time<br />

reported in Romania, from Muntenia, by CIOCÂRLAN (1991). Subsequently, it was<br />

identified in Dobrudja [MITITELU & al. 1992; CIOCÂRLAN, 1994], and Moldavia<br />

[OPREA, 1997a, 1998; OPREA & al. 1997; SÎRBU & OPREA, 1998; COROI & COROI<br />

A.M., 1999; COROI, 2001; COROI A.M., 2001; OPREA, 2005], but its area of invasion in<br />

Romania is certainly wider and in a continuous expansion. It is quite similar to K. scoparia<br />

(of which it is distinguished by the numerous whitish hairs, located under flowers), reason<br />

why, in many cases, it may have been erroneously identified, as K. scoparia. Recently it<br />

was also found in Transylvania, in Sibiu city, on a ruderal ground, near the railway station<br />

(45º47′32.25′′N; 24º10′18.90′′E; leg. Eliáš P. jun., Ferus P., Oprea A., Sîrbu C., 2011<br />

August 19).<br />

d) Alien species found in new localities<br />

Brachyactis ciliata (Ledeb.) Ledeb. (Erigeron ciliatus Ledeb.; Symphyotrichum<br />

ciliatum (Ledeb.) G. L. Nesom)<br />

It is an Asian species [BOTSCHANTZEV, 1999/1959], known as alien plant in<br />

Poland [BRÓŚ & PODGÓRSKA, 2005], R. of Moldova [DAISIE, 2011] and Romania. It<br />

was found in Eastern Romania (Moldavia), in the year 1967 [VIŢĂLARIU, 1971; POP &<br />

VIŢĂLARIU, 1971]. Subsequently, it has spread fairly quickly in this province, as well as<br />

in Muntenia and Dobrudja (including the Danube Delta) [OPREA, 2005]. In Transylvania,<br />

this plant was previously reported only from Cluj-Napoca [FILIPAŞ & CRISTEA, 2006].<br />

We also found it at Gheorgheni (Harghita county) (on a ruderal ground, near the railway<br />

station; 46º43′10.68′′N; 25º34′21.71′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., Eliáš P. jun., Ferus P., Oprea A., 2011<br />

August 18), as well as in Sibiu (Sibiu county), near the railway station (45º47′14.51′′N;<br />

24º10′46.95′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., Oprea A., Eliáš P. jun., Ferus P., 2011 August 19).<br />

Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.<br />

Species originating in tropical and subtropical Asia [CIOCÂRLAN, 2009] or<br />

Africa [HILDEBRAND, 2008], now widespread throughout the world, mainly in regions<br />

with warmer climates [HITCHCOCK, 1950; BRITTON & BROWN, 1970; JÜRGENS,<br />

126


SÎRBU CULIŢĂ, OPREA ADRIAN, ELIÁŠ PAVOL jun., FERUS PETER<br />

1977; SALIMATH & al. 1995; CLAYTON & al. 2006]. It is reported as a naturalized alien<br />

plant in Southern Europe [HANSEN, in TUTIN & al. 1980] and as casual in the central and<br />

western regions [LE CLERCH, 1973; HANSEN, in TUTIN & al. 1980]. The first report of<br />

this species in Romania (as a sub-spontaneous plant) was from Iaşi, where it seems to have<br />

arrived accidentally (in 1957) with seeds of Lolium perenne bought from the market, and<br />

used for lawns in the surroundings of the Agronomical Institute [RĂVĂRUŢ &<br />

MITITELU, 1960]. Subsequently, E. indica has not been confirmed as a sub-spontaneous<br />

species in Iaşi. Instead, it was reported from Crişana (North-Western Romania)<br />

[NEGREAN & KARÁCSONYI, 1984], Dobrudja [COSTEA, 1996], as well as from<br />

Muntenia [NEGREAN & CONSTANTIN, 1999; OPREA & al. 2004]. Recently it has been<br />

found in Galaţi railway station (45º26′41.69′′N; 28º03′40.48′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., 2011 July<br />

20), in the second locality in Moldavia. E. indica is seen in general as a common and<br />

harmful weed of crops in warmer regions of the world [HITCHCOCK, 1950; JÜRGENS,<br />

1977]. In Romania, although it was mentioned only in a few localities so far, the fact that<br />

his presence was noted in so distant regions (Maramureş, Moldavia, Dobrudja, Muntenia)<br />

may be an alarm signal on its invasive capacity, particularly in that regions with high<br />

temperature and light resources.<br />

Euphorbia dentata Michx.<br />

Species of North American origin, naturalized in Ukraine [MOSYAKIN &<br />

YAVORSKA, 2002], R. of Moldova [MÎRZA & ŞABANOVA, 1992], Belgium, Italy<br />

[DAISIE, 2011], as well as in Eastern Asia [MA & LIU, 2003; LEE & al. 2009]. In<br />

Romania, it was previously known from Socola-Iaşi (including var. cuphosperma Engelm.)<br />

[OPREA, 1997b] and from Buzău railway stations [SÎRBU, 2005]. To these, we add now<br />

two other localities in Southern Moldavia: Tecuci – Southern railway station<br />

(45º25′04.23′′N; 27º25′23.42′′E; leg. Sîrbu & Oprea 2011, 2011 August 01) and Movileni -<br />

railway yard (45º24′17.50′′N; 27º57′26.80′′E; leg. Sîrbu & Oprea, 2011 August 02).<br />

Grindelia squarrosa (Pursh) Dunal. (Donia squarrosa Pursh)<br />

Species native to North America [BRITTON & BROWN, 1970], accidentally<br />

introduced to Europe in the first half of last century (Ukraine) [TAMAMSCHJAN,<br />

1999/1959; PROTOPOPOVA & al. 2006]. It is now known as an invasive plant in Ukraine<br />

and R. of Moldova [MÎRZA & al. 1987; MOSYAKIN & YAVORSKA, 2002;<br />

PROTOPOPOVA & al. 2006], naturalized in Central and Eastern Russia<br />

[TAMAMSCHJAN, 1999/1959; HANSEN, in TUTIN & al. 1976], with a casual status in<br />

other european countries [GUDZINSKAS, 1997; KUKK, 1999; PYŠEK & al. 2002;<br />

REYNOLDS, 2002; GREUTER, 2006-2009]. In Romania, it was previously mentioned<br />

from Iaşi at Socola railway station [SÎRBU & OPREA, 1998] and Galaţi [SÎRBU &<br />

OPREA, 2008]. Recently, it was also found at Movileni railway yard (between<br />

45º24′19.33′′N; 27º57′13.27′′E and 45º24′26.89′′N; 27º56′36.58; leg. Sîrbu & Oprea, 2011<br />

August 02), as well as at Tirighina-Barboşi railway yard (45º24′20.50′′N; 27º59′31.95; leg.<br />

Sîrbu & Oprea, 2011 August 02) (Galaţi county).<br />

Impatiens parviflora DC.<br />

Species originating in the mountainous regions of central Asia [POBEDIMOVA,<br />

1974/1949], invasive in Europe, except the Mediterranean region [MOORE, in TUTIN & al.<br />

127


NEW CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF ALIEN FLORA IN ROMANIA<br />

1968; WITTENBERG, 2005]. In Romania, it was mentioned initially by PRODAN (1939), as<br />

an ornamental plant, sometimes escaped from gardens (without location). It is now quite<br />

widespread in Transylvania [DRĂGULESCU, 2003; CIOCÂRLAN, 2006], Crişana [POP &<br />

al. 1968; RESMERIŢĂ, 1970], Maramureş [RESMERIŢĂ & al. 1975-1987, cited by<br />

OPREA, 2005; OPREA & SÎRBU, 2006], Banat [GOGA, 1980; PĂTROESCU & al. 2007],<br />

and Moldavia [OPREA & al. 1997; SÎRBU & OPREA, 1998; DARABAN, 2007]. In this<br />

paper, we mention it from the following new localities: Borşa (Maramureş county) (leg.<br />

Sîrbu, 2006 August 23), the chalet Bâlea-Râu (leg. Sîrbu C., Oprea A., 2009 August 17),<br />

Cârţişoara at Glăjărie (leg. Sîrbu C., Oprea A., 2009 August 19) (Sibiu county), Braşov<br />

(45º40′27.10′′N; 25º38′33.82′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., Oprea A., Eliáš P. jun., Ferus P., 2011 August<br />

19), Sibiu - railway station (Sibiu county) (45º47′41.41′′N; 24º10′09.82′′; leg. Sîrbu C. Oprea<br />

A., Eliáš P. jun., Ferus P., 2011 August 18), Bogăţii Forest (Braşov county) (leg. Sîrbu C.,<br />

Oprea A., 2009 August 19), Gheorgheni (46º42′59.89′′N; 25º34′29.15′′E; leg. Sîrbu C. Oprea<br />

A., Eliáš P. jun., Ferus P., 2011 August 18) (Harghita county), Burdujeni-Suceava (railway<br />

station) (47º40′12.79′′N; 26º15′50.45′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., 2011 June 15), between Câmpulung<br />

Moldovenesc and Pojorâta (47º32′04.64′′N; 27º29′45.86′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., 2011 September 01)<br />

(Suceava county).<br />

Juncus dudleyi Wiegand (J. tenuis Willdenow var. dudleyi (Wiegand) F. J.<br />

Hermann; J. tenuis var. uniflorus Farwell)<br />

Species native to North America [BRITTON & BROWN, 1970], reported as an<br />

alien plant in some countries of Western and Central Europe [SNOGERUP, in TUTIN & al.<br />

1980; DAISIE, 2011], previously mentioned in Romania from the Făgăraş Mountains, in<br />

Brezcioara valley (Braşov county) [NEGREAN, 1987; CIOCÂRLAN, 2009]. It was also<br />

found at Borzont (46º40′52.26′′N; 25º23′35.69′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., Oprea A., Eliáš P. jun.,<br />

Ferus P., 2011 August 18) (Harghita county).<br />

Sicyos angulatus L.<br />

Species native to North America [BRITTON & BROWN, 1970], and naturalized in<br />

a large part of Europe [VASILCHENKO, 1972/1957; TUTIN, in TUTIN & al. 1968;<br />

PYŠEK & al. 2002; ESSL & RABITSCH, 2002; STEŠEVIĆ & al. 2008; VIVANT, 1983;<br />

SANZ ELORZA & al. 2001]. In Romania, it is known as an alien plant (sporadically) in all<br />

provinces of the country [BAUMGARTEN, 1816; HEUFFEL, 1858; COMAN, 1946;<br />

BORZA, 1947; PRODAN & NYÁRÁDY, in SĂVULESCU, 1964; CIOCÂRLAN, 2009;<br />

ANASTASIU, 2010]. In Moldavia (Eastern Romania) it was previously reported from<br />

Suceava county only (Northern Moldavia) [MITITELU & al. 1989]. We have also found it<br />

in Galaţi city (Southern Moldavia), on the banks of a stream that flows into the Danube<br />

river (45º24′55.86′′N; 28º01′53.35′′E; leg. Sîrbu C., Oprea A., Eliáš P. jun., Ferus P., 2011<br />

August 20).<br />

Conclusions<br />

In this paper, a number of seventeen alien plant species are presented, one of them<br />

being mentioned for the first time in Romania’s flora, eight species are new in Moldavia<br />

and one species is new in Transylvania. Other seven species are reported now from new<br />

localities.<br />

128


SÎRBU CULIŢĂ, OPREA ADRIAN, ELIÁŠ PAVOL jun., FERUS PETER<br />

Some of these species (e.g. Brachyactis ciliata, Chenopodium pumilio, Eleusine<br />

indica, Euphorbia dentata, Grindelia squarrosa, Impatiens parviflora, Kochia sieversiana,<br />

Solidago gigantea, Sicyos angulatus) have a remarkable spreading tendency, expanding<br />

their area of invasion in Romania. Others are still quite rare, but the capacity of all these<br />

alien species to reproduce without human help must be taken into account in order to<br />

prevent their further invasion.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

This work was supported by ANCS Romania, PN II CAPACITĂŢI, project SK-RO<br />

0013-10, contract number 474/07.03.2011, and CNCSIS-UEFISCDI Romania, project<br />

number PNII - IDEI_1227.<br />

References<br />

1. ANASTASIU P. 1994. Plante naturalizate în municipiul Bucureşti. Acta Horti Bot. Bucurest., /1993-1994/:<br />

135-137.<br />

2. ANASTASIU P. 2010. Contributions to chorological data on Romanian flora. Acta Horti Bot. Bucurest., 37:<br />

45-50.<br />

3. ANASTASIU P. & NEGREAN G. 2005. Alien plants in Romania (I). Analele Şti. Univ. “Alexandru Ioan<br />

Cuza” Iaşi, ser. II, a. Biol. veg., 51: 87-96.<br />

4. ANASTASIU P. & NEGREAN G. 2008. Plante străine noi în România. Analele Univ. Craiova. Ser.<br />

Agricult., Montanologie, Cadastru, 38: 1-10.<br />

5. ARVAT N. 1977. Flora şi vegetaţia dintre râurile Timiş, Pogoniş şi Bârzava. Teză doctorat, Iaşi: Inst.<br />

Agron.<br />

6. BALOGH L., DANCZA I. & KIRÁLY G. 2004. Actual list of neophytes in Hungary and their classification<br />

according to their success, pp. 61-92. In: MIHÁLY B. & BOTTA-DUKÁT Z. (eds). Biological<br />

invasions in Hungary - Invasive plants. Budapest: Természet Búvár Alapítvány Kiadó.<br />

7. BAUMGARTEN J. C. G. 1816. Enumeratio Stirpium Magno Transsilvaniae Principatui, I-III, Vindobonae.<br />

8. BELDIE AL. 1977-1979. Flora României. Determinator ilustrat al plantelor vasculare. I-II. Bucureşti: Edit.<br />

Academiei R. S. România, 412 pp., 406 pp.<br />

9. BORZA AL. 1947. Conspectus Florae Romaniae, Regionumque affinum. Cluj-Napoca: Edit. Cartea<br />

Românească, 360 pp.<br />

10. BORZA AL. 1959. Flora şi vegetaţia Văii Sebeşului. Bucureşti: Edit. Academiei R. P. Române, 327 pp.<br />

11. BOTSCHANTZEV V. P. 1999/1959. Genus Brachyactis Ldb., pp. 178-180. In: SCHISCHKIN B.K. (ed).<br />

Flora of the USSR, vol. 25, Washington: Smithsonian Institution Libraries (Translated from Russian:<br />

Flora SSSR, 25, 1959, Moskow-Leningrad: Akademia Nauk).<br />

12. BRÂNDZĂ D. 1879-1883. Prodromul Florei Române. Bucureşti: Tipogr. Academiei Române, 568 pp.<br />

13. BRITTON N. & BROWN A. 1970. An illustrated flora of the Northern United States and Canada, I-III.<br />

New York: Dover Publ. Inc.<br />

14. BRÓŚ E. & PODGÓRSKA M. 2005. Symphyotrichum ciliatum (Brachyactis ciliata) (Asteraceae) w Polsce.<br />

Fragm. Flor. Geobot. Polonica, 12(2): 291-299.<br />

15. CASTROVIEJO S. 1995. Notulae taxinomicae, chorologicae, nomenclaturales, bibliographicae aut<br />

philologicae in opus “Flora Iberica” intendentes. Anales Jardin Bot. Madrid, 53(2): 271-279.<br />

16. CHYTRY M. 1993. Chenopodium pumilio R. Br., a new adventive species for Romania. Linzer Biol. Beitr.,<br />

25(1): 151-152.<br />

17. CIOCÂRLAN V. 1991. Kochia sieversiana (Pall.) C. A. M. în flora României. Stud. Cerc. Biol., ser. Biol.<br />

veg., 43(1-2): 3-4.<br />

18. CIOCÂRLAN V. 1991. Cenchrus incertus M. A. Curtis în flora României, Stud. Cerc. Biol., ser. Biol. veg.,<br />

43(1-2): 7-8.<br />

19. CIOCÂRLAN V. 1994. Flora Deltei Dunării. Bucureşti: Edit. Ceres, 175 pp.<br />

20. CIOCÂRLAN V. 2009. Flora ilustrată a României. Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta (ed. III). Bucureşti: Edit.<br />

Ceres, 1138 pp.<br />

129


NEW CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF ALIEN FLORA IN ROMANIA<br />

21. CIOCÂRLAN V. 2006. Contributions to the knowledge of some rare plant species in the flora of Romania.<br />

Bul. Grăd. Bot. Iaşi, 13: 81-84.<br />

22. CIOCÂRLAN V. & COSTEA M. 1994. Lindernia dubia (L.) Pennell, specie nouă în flora României.<br />

Analele Şti. Inst. Delta Dunării, Tulcea: 7-8.<br />

23. CIOCÂRLAN V., BERCA M., CHIRILĂ C., COSTE I. & POPESCU GH. 2004. Flora segetală a României.<br />

Bucureşti: Edit. Ceres, 351 pp.<br />

24. CLAYTON W. D., HARMAN K. T & WILLIAMSON H. 2006. GrassBase - The Online World Grass Flora.<br />

http://www.kew.org/data/grasses-db.html [accessed: 2008, June 07].<br />

25. COMAN A. 1946. Enumerarea plantelor vasculare din Maramureşul românesc, din herbarul “A. Coman”, I-<br />

II, Bul. Grăd. Bot. Muz. Bot. Cluj, 46(1-2): 57-89; 46(3-4): 110-130.<br />

26. COROI M. & COROI A. M. 1999. Contribuţii la cunoaşterea cormoflorei judeţului Vrancea. Lucr. Şti. Univ.<br />

Agr. Iaşi, ser. Horticult., 42: 400-402.<br />

27. COROI A. M. 2001. Flora şi vegetaţia din bazinul râului Milcov. Iaşi: Edit. Tehnopress, 411 pp.<br />

28. COROI M. 2001. Flora şi vegetaţia din bazinul râului Şuşiţa. Iaşi: Edit. Tehnopress, 398 pp.<br />

29. COSTEA M. 1994. Chenopodium pumilio R. Br., o nouă specie adventivă în flora României. Stud. Cerc.<br />

Biol., ser. Biol. veg., 46(2): 117-119.<br />

30. COSTEA M. 1996. The recording of some new adventive taxa for Romania in the harbor of Constanţa. Rev.<br />

Roum. Biol., ser. Biol. vég., 41(2): 91-96.<br />

31. CSISZÁR Á. & BARTHA D. 2008. Green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh.), pp. 161-166. In: ZOLTAN-<br />

BOTTA D. & BALOGH L. (eds) 2008. The most important invasive plants in Hungary, Vácrátót:<br />

Institute of Ecology and Botany, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.<br />

32. DAISIE 2011. Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe. http://www.europe-aliens.org/<br />

[accessed: 2011 Oct. 07].<br />

33. DARABAN M. 2007. Cercetări floristice şi fitocenologice în parcul natural Vânători-Neamţ. Iaşi: Teză<br />

doctorat, Univ. “Alexandru Ioan Cuza”.<br />

34. DIACONESCU V. 1961. Sectorul “Plante ornamentale” al Grădinii Botanice din Bucureşti. Acta Horti Bot.<br />

Bucurest., /1960/: 71-118.<br />

35. DIHORU GH., ANDREI M. & CRISTUREAN I. 1968/1970. Date preliminare despre flora şi vegetaţia<br />

ierboasă dintre Valea Mraconiei şi Cazanele Mari ale Dunării. Acta Horti Bot. Bucurest.: 207-214.<br />

36. DRĂGULESCU C. 2003. Cormoflora judeţului Sibiu. Braşov: Edit. Pelecanus, 533 pp.<br />

37. DUMITRIU-TĂTĂRANU I. 1960. Arbori, arbuşti forestieri şi ornamentali cultivaţi în R.P.R., Bucureşti:<br />

Edit. Agro-Silvică, 810 pp.<br />

38. ESSL F. & RABITSCH W. (eds) 2002. Neobiota in Österreich. Wien: Umweltbundesamt GmbH, 432 pp.<br />

39. FĂGĂRAŞ M., SKOLKA M., ANASTASIU P., COGĂLNICEANU P., NEGREAN G., BĂNICĂ G.,<br />

TUDOR M. & SAMOILĂ C. 2008. Biodiversitatea zonei costiere a Dobrogei dintre Capul Midia şi<br />

Capul Kaliacra. Constanţa: Edit. Ex Ponto, 428 pp.<br />

40. FEHÉR A. 2008. Aster species from North America (Aster novi-belgii agg.), pp. 179-187. In: BOTTA-<br />

DUKÁT Z., BALOGH L. (eds) 2008. The most important invasive plants in Hungary. Vácrátót:<br />

Institute of Ecology and Botany, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.<br />

41. FILIPAŞ L. & CRISTEA V. 2006. De nouveaux „convives” parmi les cormophytes du municipe Cluj-<br />

Napoca. Contrib. Bot. Cluj-Napoca, 41(2): 17-21.<br />

42. FISCHER M. A., OSWALD K. & ADLER W. 2008. Excursionsflora für Österreich, Liechtenstein, und<br />

Südtirol. 3 Auflage Biologiezentrum der Oberösterreichischen Landesmuseen, 1392 pp.<br />

43. FUSS M. 1866. Flora Transsilvaniae excursoria. Cibinii, 864 pp.<br />

44. GOGA I. D. 1980. Contribuţii la flora municipiului Reşiţa şi a împrejurimilor sale (II). Ocrot. Nat., Jud.<br />

Caraş-Severin.<br />

45. GRECESCU C. 1898. Conspectul florei României. Bucureşti: Tipogr. Dreptatea, 836 pp.<br />

46. GREUTER W. 2006-2009. Compositae (pro parte majore). In: GREUTER W & RAAB-STRAUBE E. von<br />

(ed). Compositae. Euro+Med Plantbase - the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant<br />

diversity. http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/ [accessed: 2011, June 07].<br />

47. GRIFFITH R. S. 1991. Fraxinus americana. In: Fire Effects Information System [Online]. U.S. Department<br />

of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).<br />

Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [accessed: 2011, March 17].<br />

48. GUDZINSKAS Z. 1997. Conspectus of alien plant species of Lithuania. 4. Asteraceae. Bot. Lithuanica, 3(4):<br />

335-366.<br />

49. GUYOT L. 1961. Histoire des fleurs. Paris: Presses Univ. de France.<br />

50. HE A., WANG M., HAO H., ZHANG D. & LEE K. H. 1998. Hepatoprotective triterpenes from Sedum<br />

sarmentosum. Phytochemistry, 49(8): 2607-2610.<br />

130


SÎRBU CULIŢĂ, OPREA ADRIAN, ELIÁŠ PAVOL jun., FERUS PETER<br />

51. HEUFFEL J. 1858. Enumeratio Plantarum in Banatu Temesiensi sponte crescentium et frequentius<br />

cultarum, Vindobonae.<br />

52. HILDEBRAND E. A. 2008. Eleusine indica. In: GAYLE F. (ed). Laboratory Guide to Archaeological Plant<br />

Remains from Eastern North America, http://artsci.wustl.edu/~gjfritz/ [accessed: 2011, Aug. 16].<br />

53. HITCHCOCK A. S. 1950. Manual of the grasses of the United States. 2 nd Edition, Revised by Chase A.,<br />

United States Government Printing Office, Washington, 1051 pp.<br />

54. HOREANU CL. 1975. Studiul florei şi vegetaţiei podişului Casimcea. Iaşi: Teză doctorat, Univ. Iaşi.<br />

55. ILJIN M. M., 1970/1936. Fam. Chenopodiaceae Less., pp. 4-271. In: KOMAROV V. L. (ed). Flora of the<br />

USSR, 6, Washington: Smithsonian Institution Libraries, (Translated from Russian: Flora SSSR, 6,<br />

1936, Moskow-Leningrad: Akademia Nauk).<br />

56. JAKOBS G., WEBER E. & EDWARDS P. J. 2004. Introduced plants of the invasive Solidago gigantea<br />

(Asteraceae) are larger and grow denser than conspecifics in the native range. Diversity Distrib., 10:<br />

11-19.<br />

57. JOGAN N., BAČIC T. & VRES B. 1995. Prispevek k poznavanju flore okolice Ormoža (vzhodna lovenija).<br />

Natura Sloveniae, 1(1): 5-28.<br />

58. JÜRGENS G. 1977. Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn., pp. 585-586, In: KRANZ J., SCHMUTTERER H. &<br />

KOCH W. (eds). Diseases, pests and weeds in tropical crops. Berlin & Hamburg: Verlag Paul Parey.<br />

59. KANITZ A. 1979-1881. Plantas Romaniae hucusque cognitas. Claudiopoli, Apud E. Demjén, 268 pp.<br />

60. KUKK T. 1999. Eesti taimestik. Teaduste Akadeemia Kirjastus, Tartu-Tallinn. 464 pp.<br />

http://www.zbi.ee/~tomkukk/nimestik/ [accessed: 2007, Jun. 15].<br />

61. KUNJUN F. & OHBA H. 2001. Crassulaceae, pp. 202-268. In: Flora of China Editorial Committee (eds), 8:<br />

http://www.efloras.org/ [accessed: 2011, Sept. 16].<br />

62. LE CLERCH J. 1973. Introduction d’une nouvelle Graminée en France: Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx.<br />

Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr., 120: 223-226.<br />

63. LEE Y. M., PARK S. H., JUNG S. Y. & YUN S. M. 2009. Two new naturalized species from Korea,<br />

Euphorbia dentata Michx. and Securigera varia (L.) Lassen. Korean J. Plant Taxonomy, 39(2): 114-<br />

119.<br />

64. MA J. & LIU Q. 2003. Flora of Beijing: An overview and suggestions for future research, Urban Habitats,<br />

1(1): 30-44.<br />

65. MARHOLD K. 2011. Crassulaceae. In: Euro+Med Plantbase - the information resource for Euro-<br />

Mediterranean plant diversity. http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/ [accessed: 2011, Sept. 16].<br />

66. McNEELY J. A. 2001. An introduction to human dimensions of invasive alien species, pp 5-20. In:<br />

McNEELY J.A. (ed), The great reshuffling: human dimensions of invasive alien species. Gland, and<br />

Cambridge: IUCN.<br />

67. MÎRZA M., KUHARSKAIA L. & GOCIU D. 1987. Grindelia squarrosa (Pursh) Dunal na teritorii<br />

Moldavii. Ukr. Bot. J., 44(6): 42-44.<br />

68. MÎRZA M. & ŞABANOVA G. A. 1992. New scarce and adventive plants in Moldavian flora. Rezum. Lucr.<br />

Congr. Naţ. Biol. “E. Racoviţă”, Iaşi (I): 36-37.<br />

69. MITITELU D., CHIFU T., PASCAL P., 1989. Flora şi vegetaţia judeţului Suceava. Anuarul Muz. Şti. Nat.<br />

Suceava, 10: 93-120.<br />

70. MITITELU D., COSTICĂ M. & PARINCU M. 1992. La flore et la végétation de la réserve botanique de<br />

dunes littorales d’ Agigea-Constanţa. Analele Şti. Univ. “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” Iaşi, s. II, a. Biol. veg.,<br />

38: 35-40.<br />

71. MOSYAKIN S. L. & YAVORSKA O. G. 2002. The nonnative flora of the Kiev (Kyiv) urban area, Ukraine:<br />

a checklist and brief analysis. Urban Habitats, 1: 45-65.<br />

72. MÜLLER N. & OKUDA S. 1998. Invasion of alien plants in floodplains - a comparison of Europe and<br />

Japan, pp. 321-332, In: STARFINGER U., EDWARDS K., KOWARIK I. & WILLIAMSON M. (eds)<br />

1998. Plant Invasions: Ecological Mechanisms and Human Responses, Leiden: Backhuys Publishers.<br />

73. NEGREAN G. & CONSTANTIN N. 1999. Noi plante adventive în flora Bucureştiului. Acta Horti Bot.<br />

Bucurest. /1998/, 27: 143-146.<br />

74. NEGREAN G. & KARÁCSONYI C. 1984. Panicum dichotomiflorum şi Sida spinosa în flora României.<br />

Contrib. Bot. Cluj-Napoca: 33-35.<br />

75. NEGREAN G. 1972. Câteva plante adventive din flora judeţului Prahova. Com. Ref. Muz. Şti. Nat. Ploieşti:<br />

77-80.<br />

76. NEGREAN G. 1987. Adăugiri la flora României. Stud. Com. Muz. Jud. Satu Mare, 7-8: 447-459.<br />

77. OHBA H. 2009. Sedum L., in Flora of North America Editorial Committee (eds), 8. New York and Oxford,<br />

http://www.efloras.org/ [accessed: 2011, Sept. 16].<br />

78. OPREA A. 1997a. Contribuţii floristice din Câmpia Tecuciului. Bul. Grăd. Bot. Iaşi, 6(2): 441-443.<br />

131


NEW CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF ALIEN FLORA IN ROMANIA<br />

79. OPREA A. 1997b. A new species for the Romanian Flora: Euphorbia dentata Michx. Stud. Cerc. Biol., ser.<br />

Biol. veg., 49(1-2): 97-98.<br />

80. OPREA A. 1998. Completări la flora şi vegetaţia Câmpiei Tecuciului (jud. Galaţi). Bul. Grăd. Bot. Iaşi, 7(2):<br />

119-122.<br />

81. OPREA A. & SÎRBU C. 2006. Researche regarding alien plants from the left bank of the Tisa-river, between<br />

Valea Vişeului and Piatra (Romania). Kanitzia, Szombathely, 14: 45-56.<br />

82. OPREA A. 2005. Lista critică a plantelor vasculare din România. Iaşi: Edit. Univ. “Alexandru Ioan Cuza”,<br />

668 pp.<br />

83. OPREA A. & SÎRBU C. 2010. Sisymbrium volgense (Brassicaceae) in the flora of Romania. Analele Univ.<br />

Oradea - fasc. Biol., 17(2): 296-299.<br />

84. OPREA A., SÎRBU C. & PARASCHIV N. L. 1997. Flora şi vegetaţia de la gara-triaj Socola-Iaşi, I. Flora.<br />

Lucr. Şti. Univ. Agr. Iaşi, ser. Agricult., 40 (supl.): 91-97.<br />

85. OPREA A., SÂRBU A. & PASCALE G. 2004. A new contribution to the knowledge of flora and vegetation<br />

along Danube River, between Zimnicea and Călăraşi towns (Romania). Note I. Acta Horti Bot.<br />

Bucurest., 31: 141-146.<br />

86. PĂTROESCU M., CHINCEA I., ROZYLOWICZ L. & SORESCU C. (eds) 2007. Pădurile de pin negru de<br />

Banat (Pinus nigra subsp. banatica), sit Natura 2000. Timişoara: Edit. Brumar, 353 pp.<br />

87. PIMENTEL D., LACH L., YONIGA R., MORRISON D. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of<br />

nonindigenous species in the United States. BioScience, 50: 53-65<br />

88. POBEDIMOVA E.G. 1974. Genus Impatiens L., pp. 478-485. In: SCHISHKIN B.K. & BOBROV E.G.<br />

(eds). Flora of the USSR, 14, Washington: Smithsonian Institution Libraries, (Translated from Russian:<br />

Flora SSSR, 14, 1949, Moskow-Leningrad: Akademia Nauk).<br />

89. POP I. & VIŢĂLARIU GH. 1971. Erigero canadensis - Brachyactetum ciliatae - o nouă asociaţie ruderală.<br />

Contrib. Bot. Cluj-Napoca: 257-262.<br />

90. POP I., HODIŞAN I. & PETERFI L. Ş. 1968. Aspecte de vegetaţie de pe Valea Galbenă din bazinul carstic<br />

Padeş-Cetăţile Ponorului (Munţii Apuseni). Comunic. Bot. Cluj, 7: 79-94.<br />

91. PORCIUS FL. 1885. Flora din fostul district românesc al Năsăudului. Bucureşti: Analele Acad. Române,<br />

ser. II, VII, Secţ. II. Memorii şi Notiţe, 133 pp.<br />

92. PRODAN I. 1935; 1936; 1939. Conspectul florei Dobrogei, I, II, III, Cluj-Napoca: Tipografia Cartea<br />

Românească.<br />

93. PRODAN I. 1939. Flora pentru determinarea şi descrierea plantelor ce cresc în România, I-II. Ed. 2., Cluj-<br />

Napoca: Tipogr. Cartea Românească, 1278 pp.; 713 pp. + 31 pp.<br />

94. PROTOPOPOVA V. V., SHEVERA M. V. & MOSYAKIN S. L. 2006. Deliberate and unintentional<br />

introduction of invasive weeds: A case study of the alien flora of Ukraine. Euphytica, 148: 17-33.<br />

95. PYŠEK P., RICHARDSON D. M., REJMÁNEK M., WEBSTER G. L., WILLIAMSON M. & KIRSCHNER<br />

J. 2004. Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and<br />

ecologists. Taxon, 51(1): 131-143.<br />

96. PYŠEK P., SÁDLO J. & MANDÁK B. 2002. Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia,<br />

Praha, 74: 97-186.<br />

97. RĂVĂRUŢ M. & MITITELU D. 1960. Două specii noi în flora Republicii Populare Române. Stud. Cerc.<br />

Acad. R. P. Române, fil. Cluj, Biol., 11(1): 7-9.<br />

98. RESMERIŢĂ I. 1970. Flora, vegetaţia şi potenţialul productiv pe Masivul Vlădeasa. Bucureşti: Edit. Acad.<br />

Române, 318 pp.<br />

99. REYNOLDS S. C. P. 2002. A catalogue of alien plants in Ireland. National Botanic Gardens, Glasnevin,<br />

Ireland. Occasional Papers, No. 14, 414 pp.<br />

100. RICHARDSON D. M., PYŠEK P., REJMANEK M., BARBOUR M., PANETTA F. D. & WEST C. J. 2000.<br />

Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distrib., 6: 93-107.<br />

101. ROMAN N. 1974. Flora şi vegetaţia din sudul Podişului Mehedinţi. Bucureşti: Edit. Acad. Române, 222 pp.<br />

102. SALIMATH S. S., HIREMATH S. C. & MURTHY H. N. 1995. Genome differentiation patterns in diploid<br />

(Poaceae) species of Eleusine. Hereditas, 122: 189-195.<br />

103. SANZ ELORZA M., DANA E. & SOBRINO VESPERINAS E. 2001. Aproximación al listado de plantas<br />

alóctonas invasoras reales y potenciales en España. Lazaroa, 22: 121-131.<br />

104. SĂVULESCU TR. (ed) 1956, 1961, 1964. Flora R. P. Române, IV, VIII, IX. Bucureşti: Edit. Acad.<br />

Române.<br />

105. SCHUR J. F. 1866. Enumeratio Plantarum Transsilvaniae, Vindobonae, 984 pp.<br />

106. ŠEGULJA N. & REGULA BEVILACQUA L. J. 1994. Sedum sarmentosum Bunge a newcomer in Croatian<br />

flora. Nat. Croat., 3(1): 91-97.<br />

132


SÎRBU CULIŢĂ, OPREA ADRIAN, ELIÁŠ PAVOL jun., FERUS PETER<br />

107. SIMONKAI L. 1886. Erdély edényes flórájának helyesbített foglalata (Enumeratio florae Transsilvaniae<br />

vesculosae critica). Budapest: Kiadja A Kir. Magyar Természettudományi Társulat.<br />

108. SÎRBU C. 2005. Euphorbia dentata şi alte plante adventive, pe cale de răspândire în estul României. Lucr.<br />

Şti. Univ. Agron. Iaşi, ser. Agron., 48 (CD, sect. 1).<br />

109. SÎRBU C. & OPREA A. 1998. Grindelia squarrosa (Pursh) Dunal en Roumanie. Rev. Roum. Biol., Biol.<br />

vég. 43(2): 91-93.<br />

110. SÎRBU C. & OPREA A. 2011. New records in the alien flora of Romania (Artemisia argyi, A.<br />

lavandulaefolia) and Europe (A. lancea). Turk. J. Bot., 35: 717-728.<br />

111. ŞTEFUREAC T., POPESCU A., ZITTI R. & MIHAI GH. 1971. Analiza florei cormofitelor din sectorul<br />

Şviniţa-Tricule (Clisura Dunării). Com. Bot. Cluj, 12: 111-131.<br />

112. STEŠEVIĆ D., PETROVIĆ D., BUBANJA N., VUKSANOVIĆ S. & BIERDŽIĆ V. 2008. Contribution to<br />

the flora of Montenegro (Supplementum to the material for the vascular flora of Montenegro). Natura<br />

Montenegrina, 7(3): 463-480.<br />

113. SZABO J. 1841. Flora Principatului Moldovei, pentru cunoaşterea plantelor crescătoare în Moldova.<br />

Manuscris, Bibl. Centr. Univ. Iaşi.<br />

114. SZIGETVÁRI C. 2008. Coast sandspur (Cenchrus incertus M. A. Curtis), pp. 9-1. In: BOTTA-DUKÁT Z.,<br />

BALOGH L. (eds) 2008. The most important invasive plants in Hungary. Vácrátót: Institute of Ecology<br />

and Botany, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.<br />

115. TAMAMSCHJAN S. G. 1999/1959. Genus Grindelia Willd., pp. 30-31.; Genus Aster L., pp. 72-104. In<br />

SCHISCHKIN B. K. (ed). Flora of the USSR, 25, Washington: Smithsonian Institution Libraries<br />

(Translated from Russian: Flora SSSR, 25, 1959, Moskow-Leningrad: Akademia Nauk).<br />

116. TUTIN T. G., HEYWOOD V. H., BURGES N. A., MOORE D. M., VALENTINE D. H., WALTERS S. M.<br />

& WEBB D. A. (eds) 1964-1980. Flora Europaea, 1-5. 1 st Ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University<br />

Press, 464, 455, 370, 523, 467 pp.<br />

117. TUTIN T. G., BURGES N. A., CHATER A. O., EDMONSON J. R., HEYWOOD V. H., MOORE D. M.,<br />

VALENTINE D. H., WALTERS S. M. & WEBB D. A. (eds) 1993. Flora Europaea, 1 (Psilotaceae to<br />

Platanaceae). 2 nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 581 pp.<br />

118. VASSILCZENKO I. T. 1972/1957. Fam. Cucurbitaceae Hall., pp. 67-91. In: SCHISCHKIN B. K.,<br />

BOBROV E. G. (eds). Flora of the USSR, 24, Washington: Smithsonian Institution Libraries<br />

(Translated from Russian: Flora SSSR, 24, 1957, Moskow-Leningrad: Akademia Nauk).<br />

119. VERLOOVE F. 2006. Catalogue of neophytes in Belgium (1800-2005). Scripta <strong>Botanica</strong> Belgica, 39: 1-89.<br />

120. VIŢĂLARIU GH. 1971. Noi date floristice din bazinul Crasnei. Analele Şti. Univ. “Alexandru Ioan Cuza”<br />

Iaşi, sect. II, a. Biol., 17(1): 225-228.<br />

121. VIVANT J. 1983. Breves notes sur la flore adventice. Bull. Soc. Bot. France, 130: 81-83.<br />

122. WEBER E. F. & JAKOBS G. 2005. Biological flora of central Europe: Solidago gigantea Aiton. Flora, 200:<br />

109-118.<br />

123. WITTENBERG R. (ed.) 2005. An inventory of alien species and their threat to biodiversity and economy in<br />

Switzerland. CABI Bioscience Switzerland Centre report to the Swiss Agency for Environment, Forests<br />

and Landscape, 416 pp.<br />

124. WITTENBERG R., COCK M. J. W. 2001. Invasive alien species. How to address one of the greatest threats<br />

to biodiversity: A toolkit of best prevention and management practices. Wallingford, Oxon: CAB<br />

International.<br />

133


NEW CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF ALIEN FLORA IN ROMANIA<br />

Fig. 1. Sedum sarmentosum Bunge, at Mediaş, Sibiu county<br />

134


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 135-149<br />

135<br />

PRASAD P. RAMA CHANDRA<br />

ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF DIPTEROCARPACEAE OF<br />

NORTH ANDAMAN FOREST, INDIA<br />

PRASAD P. RAMA CHANDRA 1<br />

Abstract: Dipterocarpaceae is one of the important timber families of Andaman Islands whose members were<br />

largely exploited for their timber in the past. The current study discusses in detail about the family<br />

Dipterocarpaceae of North Andaman forest with reference to its species composition, population<br />

structure and other ecological entities. Data was analyzed using various ecological and statistical<br />

methods. Dipterocarps were encountered in 97 plots, occupying 80% of the sampled area with 68<br />

stems ha -1 and basal area of 8.2 m 2 ha -1 . Dipterocarpaceae ranked 3 rd with reference to stem density<br />

(11%) and 1 st with respect to basal area (18%). The family showed five species viz., Dipterocarpus<br />

alatus, D. costatus, D. gracilis, D. grandiflorus and Hopea odorata compounded from two genera –<br />

Dipterocarpus and Hopea. Keeping in view of the species demographic structure as well as<br />

regeneration status, conservative measures are suggested along with certain research questions which<br />

need immediate attention in the fragile insular ecosystems of Andaman Islands.<br />

Key words: Andaman, dipterocarps, dispersion, endemic, regeneration, South East Asia<br />

Introduction<br />

Dipterocarpaceae is one of the main timber families in the forests of Southeast<br />

Asia that forms a high proportion of the emergent and main canopy strata of the forest<br />

[MANOKARAN, 1996]. The members of this family, besides playing a vital role as<br />

potential timber species that form an important means of economy in the timber market<br />

[APPANAH, 1998; POORE, 1989] also act as source of other non-timber products for the<br />

livelihood of the forest dwellers [PANAYOTOU & ASHTON, 1992]. The species of<br />

Dipterocarps often locally referred as Gurjan, are extensively utilized for the extraction of<br />

resins. From the oleoresins of Dipterocarpus alatus and Dipterocarpus grandiflorus,<br />

Gurjan oil is produced which is used as medicine to treat various skin ailments and ulcers.<br />

The resins also have industrial application as varnish and anti-corrosive coatings. The hard<br />

solid resin, commonly called as rock dammar, derived from Hopea species is used for<br />

making boats and handicrafts [SHIVA & JANTAN, 1998].<br />

With reference to South Asia the family is distributed in India, Andaman &<br />

Nicobar Islands (A&N), Nepal, Bangladesh and Srilanka [ASHTON, 1982]. A detailed<br />

review on systematic distribution and taxonomical classification of Dipterocarpaceae<br />

globally was elucidated by MAURY-LECHON & CURTET (1998) and for Indian subcontinent<br />

by KUNDU (2008). The family Dipterocarpaceae derived its name from one of<br />

its important genera Dipterocarpus and has 17 genera with more than 500 species<br />

[MAURY-LECHON & CURTET, 1998] out of which, 10 genera and 99 species are<br />

exclusively found in South Asia (FAO 1985). Within the Indian forest scenario, the family<br />

is diversified by 31 species with 16 endemic (14 to peninsular India, one in North East and<br />

one in Andaman Islands) from 5 genera [TEWARY & SARKAR, 1987].<br />

1<br />

Lab for spatial Informatics, International Institute of Information Technology, Gachibowli, 500032, Hyderabad –<br />

India, e-mail: rcprasad@iiit.ac.in


ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF DIPTEROCARPACEAE OF NORTH ANDAMAN FOREST, INDIA<br />

In the past and current scenario, forests are exploited beyond their limit, ultimately<br />

threatening the survival of the species. A successful management of recycling process<br />

provides continuous supply of goods and is true even with the plant resources. If the species<br />

are utilized proportionately without disturbing their ecological conditions and are allowed<br />

for regular natural regeneration process, they may sustain themselves to provide the unintermittent<br />

supply of products. But due to lack of this awareness and illicit anthropogenic<br />

activities many species are facing risk of extinction. The same is the case with<br />

Dipterocarpaceae members of A&N which fall under one of the five phytogeographical<br />

regions that show wide distribution of the family [APPANAH, 1998].<br />

The forests of A&N were virgin until the establishment of the penal colonies<br />

around 1857 and then exploitation for timber, predominantly of Padauk (Pterocarpus) and<br />

Gurjan (Dipterocarpus). Forests were logged for timber by adopting either clear felling<br />

system or selective felling system by the forest department depending on the necessity and<br />

suitability of the scheme [DEVRAJ, 2001]. Forests areas which were extracted have been<br />

regenerated naturally or artificially by proposing various forest working plans such as<br />

conversion working circle, protection working circle, minor forest produce circle etc., for<br />

sustainable management [BASU, 1990; DEVRAJ, 2001]. Apart from the logging actions of<br />

forest department, the forests of A&N were also exploited to major extent by the<br />

encroachment activities of Island settlers. The study of PRASAD & al. (2010) detailed<br />

various anthropogenic and natural driving factors that have affected the forest of North<br />

Andaman, threatening phytodiversity. The factors discussed are more or less similar in the<br />

other adjacent Islands of archipelago with profound contribution in the deterioration of<br />

forest ecosystem. Keeping in view of the importance of Dipterocarpaceae of A&N and the<br />

logging activities these Islands faced till recent past it is of prime importance to have a<br />

database with reference to their species composition and demographic structure. This is<br />

essential for setting up priorities for conservation of the species based upon their population<br />

structure and endemicity. However such kind of information for these Islands is scanty and<br />

limited. In this context, adding to the already existing database, the current study attempts<br />

to describe the ecological attributes and spatial distribution of the family Dipterocarpaceae<br />

of A&N archipelago.<br />

Forests of A&N have mixed assemblage of species composition, showing<br />

similarities with the flora of mainland India, Malayasia and Indonesia [SINGH & al. 2002].<br />

Several floristic [BHARGAVA, 1958; THOTHATHRI, 1961, 1962; BALAKRISHNAN &<br />

NAIR, 1977; DAGAR, 1989; REDDY & al. 2008; REDDY & PRASAD, 2008] and few<br />

ecological studies [PADALIA & al. 2004; TRIPATHI & al. 2004; PRASAD & al. 2007a,<br />

2009a; RASINGAM & PARTHASARATHY, 2009; RAJKUMAR &<br />

PARTHASARATHY, 2008] were carried out to detail the structure, biological richness and<br />

diversity patterns of forest of Andaman Islands. However the family level species studies<br />

are new to these Islands and so far such kind of study was carried out by PRASAD & al.<br />

(2008) on Euphorbiaceae of North Andaman. Though Euphorbiaceae is one among the<br />

important species rich families, usually the forest of Southeast Asia are referred as<br />

Dipterocarpus forest, because of their distinct distribution in most of the Southeast Asian<br />

forests [APPANAH, 1998]. The spatial pattern of Dipterocarpaceae within A&N is unique<br />

and the family is represented only in Andaman Islands and absent in Nicobar [MATHEW<br />

& al. 2009].<br />

136


137<br />

PRASAD P. RAMA CHANDRA<br />

Objective of the study<br />

In general, majority of the field inventories focus on deriving the species richness<br />

and diversity at regional or at forest community levels. However, this type of studies<br />

usually specifies the phytodiversity patterns across the study area. A detail understanding<br />

about the species richness, spatial distribution and population structure of a plant family<br />

will help in the generation of quantitative database about the demography of the species<br />

within the family, their current status and threat they face if proper conservative steps are<br />

not initiated. It also helps in assessing the loss of ecological services rendered by the<br />

species for forest ecological dynamics and livelihood of the people, once the species enter<br />

into the phase of extinction. Towards this direction, the current study discusses in detail<br />

about the family Dipterocarpaceae of North Andaman forest of A&N archipelago with<br />

reference to its species composition, population structure and other ecological entities along<br />

with its occurrence, dominance and existence (?) in other adjacent Islands. The study<br />

provides an essential database of Dipterocarpaceae species towards their conservation<br />

efforts and supports further research for the future investigators to work on lesser known<br />

Dipterocarpaceae of Andaman forests.<br />

Study area<br />

The present study was carried out in the North Andaman (NA) forest of A&N<br />

(Fig. 1) which is one among the 14 identified Biosphere Reserves of India [DEVRAJ,<br />

2001]. NA constitutes one of the important major Islands of A&N and lies between 12°95 ”<br />

N and 92°86 ” E covering an area of 1458 km 2 . All the Islands of NA were declared either as<br />

protected areas or as wild life sanctuaries towards conservation measures [HANDBOOK,<br />

1983]. Topography is undulating having hills and narrow valleys with highest elevation of<br />

732 m above mean sea level represented by Saddle Peak, which is the top point in the entire<br />

A&N. Typical tropical rain forest climate exists in these Islands due to continuous showers<br />

from both south-west and north-east monsoons and with least temperature variations. The<br />

soils belong to Serpentine series with top soil having high base status and less nutrient<br />

values supporting dense evergreen forests of Dipterocarpus and its associates [DEVRAJ,<br />

2001].<br />

Fig. 1. Location map of the study area


ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF DIPTEROCARPACEAE OF NORTH ANDAMAN FOREST, INDIA<br />

Though the topographic variations are minor with poor soil conditions these<br />

Islands seize an extraordinary vivid biodiversity and endemism. As per CHAMPION &<br />

SETH (1968) major hinterland vegetation types of study area include Andaman evergreen,<br />

Andaman Semi evergreen and Andaman Moist deciduous.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

The detailed vegetation map prepared using satellite data [PRASAD & al. 2007b]<br />

formed basis for the selection of plots (0.1 ha size) for field inventory in two predominant<br />

forest types viz evergreen (EG) and semi-evergreen (SEG) of the study area. About 120<br />

plots (62 in EG, 58 in SEG) covering entire NA forest were surveyed during field inventory<br />

for phytosociological data collection. The size of each sample plot was 32 x 32 m for trees,<br />

10 x 10 m for saplings (two opposite corners of the main plot) and 1 x 1 m for seedlings (all<br />

the four corners of the main plot). Within each plot all the trees having diameter at breast<br />

height (DBH) > 30 cms were measured, with simultaneous investigation on sapling and<br />

seedling data.<br />

The data was analyzed to extract the structural and ecological aspects of<br />

Dipterocarpaceae using various phytosociological approaches by deriving frequency,<br />

density, basal area to compute Important Value Index [CURTIS & MCINTOSH, 1950].<br />

Calculation of IVI facilitates in identifying the dominant and co-dominant species along<br />

with their association to form community within the study area. Girth class analysis was<br />

performed to view the contribution of stem density and basal area by various girth classes.<br />

Braun-Blanquet system (1932) was used to depict the constancy (presence of occurrence of<br />

species within the sampled plots) classes as; Rare constancy (0-20%), low (21-40%),<br />

intermediate (41-60%), moderately high (61-80%) and high (81-100%). This analysis helps<br />

in assessing the population status of the species.<br />

To analyze the association between the species, the traditional method of chisquared<br />

procedure [WAITE, 2000] was used. Since sample size is


139<br />

PRASAD P. RAMA CHANDRA<br />

m = the species mean<br />

Based on the ID values, distribution of species can be interpreted as random (ID =<br />

1.0) clumped (ID >1.0) and regular (ID 30 (120 plots)<br />

d =<br />

2<br />

2χ - 2( N −1)<br />

−1<br />

2<br />

χ was corrected using the following equation<br />

Where d is the correction factor and used to define the distribution as<br />

d ≤ 1.96 : the null hypothesis accepted (random)<br />

d < -1.96: regular<br />

d > 1.96 : clumped<br />

Results<br />

The survey yielded a total of 7392 individuals from 60 families, 134 genera and<br />

192 species. Out of 120 sampled plots, Dipterocarps were encountered in 97 plots i.e 80%<br />

of the sampled area was occupied by the species. This observation is apt with the<br />

ASHTON’S (1982) remark, who stated that 80% of the abundant, emergent individuals in<br />

lowland forest of Southeast Asia are Dipterocarps. Dipterocarpaceae ranked 3 rd after<br />

Myristicacea and Sterculiaceae with reference to stem density (11%) and 1 st with respect to<br />

basal area (18%). The results are similar to the study of MANOKARAN & al. (1990) in 50<br />

ha plot of Pasoh reserve forest where Dipterocarps dominated the site with 9% stem density<br />

and 24% basal area. Dipterocarpaceae in NA forest with 68 stems ha -1 , covering basal area<br />

of 8.2 m 2 ha -1 showed five species viz., Dipterocarpus alatus, D. costatus, D. gracilis, D.<br />

grandiflorus and Hopea odorata compounded from two genera – Dipterocarpus and<br />

Hopea.<br />

Among the two forest types sampled 76% of the Dipterocarps stem density (616)<br />

was recorded from EG. With reference to D. alatus, 9 out of the 10 individuals were<br />

represented in SEG while for D. grandiflorus 289 out of 295 were encountered in EG<br />

indicating the species ecological amplitude and preferential habitats. Values for stems and<br />

basal area ha -1 were more for D. grandiflorus. Maximum DBH was recorded in D. gracilis<br />

while minimum average DBH was observed in D. grandiflorus. Though D. alatus<br />

represented with a population of 10 individuals it has showed high average DBH. The<br />

Braun-Blanquet constancy classification scaled D. alatus (3.3%) and D. costatus (6.7%)<br />

under rare, D. grandiflorus (27.5%) and Hopea odorata (20.8%) at low and D. gracilis<br />

(46.7%) on intermediate constancy.


ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF DIPTEROCARPACEAE OF NORTH ANDAMAN FOREST, INDIA<br />

Tab. 1. Species parameters of Dipterocarpaceae<br />

Species D. alatus D. costatus D. gracilis D. grandiflorus H. odorata<br />

Number of Plots in<br />

which species occurred<br />

4 8 56 33 25<br />

Stems recorded 10 43 417 295 46<br />

Mean 0.08 0.36 3.48 2.46 0.38<br />

Standard Deviation 0.54 1.86 7.19 5.52 0.90<br />

Variance 0.74 1.36 2.68 2.35 0.95<br />

Index of Dispersion 8.85 3.80 0.77 0.96 2.47<br />

2<br />

χ correction factor 30.49 14.68 -1.85 -0.32 8.87<br />

IVI 0.80 1.86 17.59 11.07 2.68<br />

Stems ha -1 1 4 35 25 4<br />

Basal area ha -1 0.2 0.4 4.4 2.6 0.5<br />

Saplings ha -1 (%) -- -- -- 12.3 --<br />

Seedlings ha -1 (%) -- -- 0.8 14.6 --<br />

Max-DBH 302 301 452 404 300<br />

Average-DBH 160 102 102 95 109<br />

Understanding the distribution and dominance of the species is one of the<br />

important aspects of ecosystem research. Species, in general, tend to undergo intra-species<br />

and inter-species competitions for the deployment of available optimal resources in their<br />

niches. The one which is the successor of the struggle proves itself dominant by showing<br />

wide eco-regional distribution dominating the sites with their stem density, area occupancy,<br />

abundance, etc. So when one species is identified as dominant, it is also interesting to know<br />

about the species which are acting as competitors for the species. In other words, it is to<br />

make out the other co-dominant species that are associated with the dominant species and<br />

forms the distinct community. Based on the derived IVI value, D. gracilis (17.59) was<br />

found to be the dominant species both in Dipterocarpaceae as well as in the entire sampled<br />

area and forms a community with Myristica glaucescens and Pterygota alata. Though the<br />

other four species of Dipterocarpaceae, didn’t dominate the study area they have their<br />

associated or neighbouring species based on IVI as follows: D. grandiflorus with<br />

Artocarpus chaplasha and Celtis wightii; D. costatus along Mitragyna rotundifolia and<br />

Baccaurea sapida; D. alatus with Canarium manii and Antiaris toxicaria; H. odorata under<br />

Artocarpus lakoocha and Dillenia andamanica community.<br />

2<br />

χ value obtained for the species D. gracilis – D. grandiflorus, D. gracilis -<br />

The<br />

H. odorata and D. grandiflorus – H. odorata exceeded the values of<br />

140<br />

2<br />

χ = 3.841(p


PRASAD P. RAMA CHANDRA<br />

other species showed significantly independent nature at 95% confidence interval with few<br />

exceptions (** in Tab. 2).<br />

Tab. 2. Species association and independent distribution analysis<br />

Test Chi-Square test Fisher's Test<br />

Species association Observed Expected chi- P-values<br />

values Values values (95% CI)<br />

D. gracilis – D. grandiflorus 33.0 15.4 49.11 --<br />

D. gracilis – H. odorata 25.0 11.7 33.43 --<br />

D. grandiflorus – H. odorata 25.0 6.9 78.72 --<br />

D. alatus – D. costatus -- -- -- 0.22197*<br />

D. alatus – D. gracilis -- -- -- 0.04471**<br />

D. alatus – D. grandiflorus -- -- -- 0.00498**<br />

D. alatus – H. odorata -- -- -- 0.45826*<br />

D. costatus – D. gracilis -- -- -- 0.00169**<br />

D. costatus – D. grandiflorus -- -- 0.00002**<br />

D. costatus – H. odorata -- -- -- 0.0001**<br />

CI - Confidence Interval, * Not significant, ** statistically significant<br />

The study of population structure provides information about the growth patterns<br />

and regeneration status of the species. The current analysis of girth wise stem and basal<br />

area distribution shows varied results for all the five species. With reference to high stem<br />

density, D. alatus showed equal number in both 60-90 cm and >240 cm class, while H.<br />

odorata showed in 60-90 cm. In the remaining three species more or less a reverse J shaped<br />

pattern was observed with high stem density in lower girth classes and low in higher<br />

implying negative exponential relationship. Except in D. gracilis and D. grandiflorus, the<br />

girth class 210-240 cm was completely absent in other species and in D. alatus even there<br />

was no representation of 120-150 cm girth class. With respect to basal area, an increasing<br />

trend was observed with low girth classes contributing low basal area and high by higher<br />

classes, with some exceptions in girth classes by different species as evident from the Fig.<br />

2. In general an ideal representation of the girth classes in terms of stem density and basal<br />

area was shown by D. gracilis. The analysis of seedling and sapling data showed poor<br />

regeneration trend for all the five species. Overall observation of sampled data showed very<br />

low percent of saplings and seedlings for D. grandiflorus, only seedlings for D. gracilis and<br />

neither for the remaining three species (Tab. 1).<br />

The d correction factor calculated for the five species showed two values viz.,<br />

>1.96 and < -1.96, rejecting the null hypothesis of random distribution (d ≤ 1.96). Out of<br />

the five species, D. alatus, D. costatus and Hopea odorata showed clumped pattern (d ><br />

1.96) following negative binomial distribution, while D. gracilis and D. grandiflorus<br />

followed regular distribution (d


ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF DIPTEROCARPACEAE OF NORTH ANDAMAN FOREST, INDIA<br />

(www.iucnredlist.org). The result of the Braun-Blanquet approach also confirms the rarity<br />

and low density of the species particularly D. alatus (endemic) D. costatus and Hopea<br />

odorata. The low population density coupled with listing under IUCN categories puts these<br />

species at high risk of threat and deserve special ecological importance for protection and<br />

conservation.<br />

Stem Density<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

30-60 60-90 90-<br />

120<br />

Dipterocarpus alatus<br />

120-<br />

150<br />

30-60 60-90 90-120 120-<br />

150<br />

150-<br />

180<br />

180-<br />

210<br />

Dipterocarpus gracilis<br />

15<br />

12.5<br />

10<br />

7.5<br />

5<br />

2.5<br />

0<br />

150-<br />

180<br />

180-<br />

210<br />

30-60 60-90 90-<br />

120<br />

210-<br />

240<br />

210-<br />

240<br />

>240<br />

>240<br />

Hopea odorata<br />

120-<br />

150<br />

150-<br />

180<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

25.00<br />

20.00<br />

15.00<br />

10.00<br />

5.00<br />

0.00<br />

180-<br />

210<br />

142<br />

210-<br />

240<br />

Girth classes<br />

20<br />

16<br />

12<br />

8<br />

4<br />

0<br />

150<br />

120<br />

90<br />

60<br />

30<br />

0<br />

>240<br />

30-60 60-90 90-<br />

120<br />

30-60 60-90 90-<br />

120<br />

2.00<br />

1.50<br />

1.00<br />

0.50<br />

0.00<br />

Dipterocarpus costatus<br />

120-<br />

150<br />

150-<br />

180<br />

180-<br />

210<br />

Dipterocarpus grandiflorus<br />

120-<br />

150<br />

150-<br />

180<br />

180-<br />

210<br />

Basal area<br />

210-<br />

240<br />

210-<br />

240<br />

Stem density<br />

Fig. 2. Stem density and basal area distribution in different girth classes of<br />

Dipterocarpaceae species<br />

>240<br />

>240<br />

1.60<br />

1.20<br />

0.80<br />

0.40<br />

0.00<br />

10.00<br />

8.00<br />

6.00<br />

4.00<br />

2.00<br />

0.00<br />

Basal area


Discussions<br />

143<br />

PRASAD P. RAMA CHANDRA<br />

Dipterocarps are observed mostly on the low altitudinal zones [WHITMORE,<br />

1988] and the number of individuals and species decreases with increasing altitude<br />

[DEVRAJ, 2001]. However in the current study, the altitude of sampled plots ranged<br />

between 10–350 m and doesn’t show significant correlation between the species<br />

distribution and altitudinal levels. This distribution is similar to Peninsular Malaysia where<br />

the altitudinal zones of the family ranged between 0-300 m and the forest are usually<br />

referred as low-undulating Dipterocarp forest [SYMINGTON, 1943; WYATT-SMITH,<br />

1963; APPANAH, 1998].<br />

The constraint of accessibility restricted the researchers to explore these Islands<br />

widely in the past. Inspite of this barrier, some of the workers carried out floristic studies<br />

and contributed fundamental information about the floristic elements of these Islands. In the<br />

recent past, researchers started working on the diversity patterns in different Islands of<br />

A&N archipelago and provided detailed account on the vegetation structure and richness<br />

patterns of various forest types existing in these Islands (Tab. 3). In all these studies<br />

Dipterocarpaceae was observed as one of the dominant families either in terms of stem<br />

density or basal area or any other phytosociological parameter.<br />

To sum up, the study carried out under the project Biodiversity characterization at<br />

landscape level in Andaman and Nicobar Islands by Department of Space and Department<br />

of Science and Technology, India [HANDBOOK, 2003] enumerated nine Dipterocarpaceae<br />

species from the random survey of 539 plots (0.1 ha & 0.04 ha sizes) in all the major<br />

Islands of A&N. However the report [HANDBOOK, 2003] did not provide information<br />

about Island wise distribution of the species. Hence the other possible sources of literature<br />

were surveyed to detail Island wise distribution of Dipterocarps.<br />

PADALIA & al. (2004) worked on Andaman Islands and observed Dipterocarps<br />

dominating the site with 18% (EG) to 15% (SEG) of stem density and D. turbinatus as<br />

second dominant species based on IVI. However the study cited only 3 species of<br />

Dipterocarpaceae (Tab. 3). The study carried out by RASINGAM & PARTHASARATHY<br />

(2009) in the Little Andaman recorded Dipterocarpaceae as 4 th dominant family<br />

contributing 6.77% of the stem density. They have encountered 3 species from the survey<br />

of 8 ha plots laid in four different vegetation types. An interesting comparative observation<br />

of their study with the current one is with reference to D. alatus, an endemic species of the<br />

Island. The current study recorded only 10 individuals (1 stem ha -1 ) in contrast to their<br />

observation of 103 (13 stems ha -1 ). So far there is no detailed information on the<br />

Dipterocarps of South Andaman. A survey conducted by PANDEY & al. (2006) on home<br />

gardens and home forest gardens in South Andaman listed D. grandiflorus as one of the top<br />

storey species.


ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF DIPTEROCARPACEAE OF NORTH ANDAMAN FOREST, INDIA<br />

Tab. 3. Distribution of Dipterocarps in Andaman Islands<br />

South<br />

Andaman<br />

Pandey &<br />

al. (2006)<br />

Little<br />

Andaman<br />

Rasingam<br />

and<br />

Parthasarathy<br />

(2009)<br />

Baratang<br />

Islands<br />

Chauhan<br />

(2004)<br />

Middle<br />

Andaman<br />

Rajkumar and<br />

Parthasarathy<br />

(2008)<br />

North<br />

Andaman<br />

Prasad<br />

(current)<br />

Andaman<br />

Islands<br />

Padalia & al.<br />

(2004)<br />

A&N<br />

Handbook<br />

(2003)<br />

S.No Species<br />

1 Dipterocarpus alatus ψ ψ ψ<br />

2 Dipterocarpus andamanicus ψ<br />

3 Dipterocarpus costatus ψ ψ ψ<br />

4 Dipterocarpus gracilis ψ ψ ψ ψ ψ<br />

5 Dipterocarpus grandiflorus ψ ψ ψ<br />

6 Dipterocarpus griffithii ψ ψ ψ<br />

7 Dipterocarpus incanus ψ ψ<br />

8 Dipterocarpus kerrii ψ<br />

9 Dipterocarpus turbinatus ψ ψ ψ<br />

10 Hopea helferi ψ<br />

11 Hopea odorata ψ ψ ψ<br />

12 Dipterocarpus grandis ψ --?<br />

ψ – Present, ? – Doubtful record<br />

144


145<br />

PRASAD P. RAMA CHANDRA<br />

With respect to Middle Andaman, the study of RAJKUMAR &<br />

PARTHASARATHY (2008) on tree diversity using one ha plot each in two different<br />

locations of Andaman Giant EG forest, recorded a total of five Dipterocarpaceae species<br />

out of which two species viz., D. kerrii and D. andamanicus were not encountered in the<br />

previous and the current studies. They have also observed Dipterocarpaceae as dominant<br />

family in terms of stem density, basal area and biomass and listed D. incanus as abundant<br />

species. The research work of CHAUHAN (2004) in Baratang, a group of scattered Islands<br />

adjacent to Middle Andaman, listed three Dipterocarp species. One of the interesting<br />

observations (Tab. 3) with respect to Baratang and Middle Andaman is recording of D.<br />

griffithii. This species was not reported in other Islands of archipelago (except in<br />

HANDBOOK, 2003). This infers that the species is restricted to a group of Islands and<br />

since both are neighboring Islands, there is a possibility of occurrence of species in both the<br />

Islands. Results of the stratified random survey in EG forest of NA by PRASAD & al.<br />

(2007a) reported Dipterocarpaceae as dominant family based on the Family importance<br />

Value Index which is the sum of relative diversity, relative density and relative dominance.<br />

From the above it is evident that these studies cumulatively provided the list of<br />

Dipterocarpaceae species that can be seen in Andaman Islands and also ranked it as one<br />

among the top families. They also conclude about the tracing of certain species which are<br />

having restricted distribution and require different sampling effort. For example, recording<br />

of D. kerrii and D. andamanicus, which were sampled only in Middle Andaman and none<br />

of the other surveys listed them. These lacunae can be attributed either to the sampling<br />

strategy adopted or site selected for study or can also be to the confined distribution of the<br />

species population.<br />

Added to the above list of species, PADALIA & al. (2004) reported D. grandis in<br />

their work on phytosociological studies of Andaman Islands. But the literature survey on<br />

Dipterocarpaceae across the world did not yield such kind of species. Also the study<br />

[HANDBOOK, 2003] recorded H. odorata from mixed evergreen forest of Nicobar Islands,<br />

which is contradicting with the observations of SINGH & al. (2002) and MATHEW & al.<br />

(2010) who stated the absence of Dipterocarpaceae in Nicobar Islands. Both these<br />

information need to be further quantified and investigated. Apart from the species listed in<br />

the Tab. 3, DEVRAJ (2001) mentioned certain species of Dipterocarpaceae viz., D. baudii,<br />

D. chartaceus, D. crinitus, D. dyeri, D. fagineus, D. hasseeltii, D. obtusifolius, D.<br />

oblongifolius, D. retusus, D. turbinatus, D. tuberculatus, whose presence is doubtful in the<br />

Andaman Islands. However, the existence of some of these species like D. turbinatus<br />

[PADALIA & al. 2004; RAJKUMAR & PARTHASARATHY, 2008], D. tuberculatus<br />

[JHA & SARMA, 2008] D. obtusifolius (biotic.org) D. baudii and D. dyeri (apafri. org)<br />

were confirmed by some studies and elaborated investigations about their population<br />

structure needed to be worked out along with the status of other species from the above list<br />

which are not so far confirmed in A&N.<br />

Hitherto D. alatus is considered to be the only endemic species of<br />

Dipterocarpaceae observed in the study area (Fig. 3) but SHIN & KYI (apafri. org, 2010)<br />

reported that D. baudii and D. dyeri are found only in Andaman and in that case they may<br />

also be considered as endemic too. Now the research question needed to be addressed is<br />

whether these species are really confined to these Islands? If these species are present in the<br />

Islands they should have been encountered in any of the floristic or ecological studies<br />

carried out till now. The possibility of their extinction couldn’t be ruled out as forest of<br />

Andaman Islands are heavily exploited in the last four decades for valuable timber as well


ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF DIPTEROCARPACEAE OF NORTH ANDAMAN FOREST, INDIA<br />

as a vast proportion of forest converted into settlement and agricultural purpose by the<br />

Island settlers [PRASAD & al. 2009b, 2010; Fig. 4]. Species which have narrow ecological<br />

amplitude doest not survive once their habitats are destroyed. It is also possible that these<br />

species may have very limited population in special pockets of Island vegetation in certain<br />

remote inaccessible location which has kept them isolated.<br />

Fig. 3. Dipterocarpus alatus – An<br />

endemic and endangered species<br />

encountered in the study area<br />

Fig. 4. Dipterocarpus species amidst agriculture field near<br />

the foothill of Saddle Peak National Park of North Andaman<br />

One of the significant points from the above observations is with reference to the<br />

number of Dipterocarpaceae species. JACOB (1981) in his work on taxonomical<br />

distribution of Dipterocarpaceae cited presence of eight species of Dipterocarpaceae from<br />

Andaman Islands in contrast to the current study which showed 12 species compounded<br />

from the field studies and literature survey. Also he reported that the Dipterocarpaceae from<br />

Andaman Islands has only one endemic species contributing 12% of the endemicity while<br />

REDDY & al. (2004) enlisted two species D. alatus and D. turbinatus var. andamanica. So<br />

the issue to resolve is whether the increase in the species number as observed in the current<br />

study is real one or ambiguity in assigning the nomenclature to the species by various<br />

researchers. As mentioned by VASUDEVA RAO (2004) sometimes even within the same<br />

publication (local flora), the one and similar species is referred under two different names.<br />

He cited few species of Dipterocarpaceae from Andaman, which were misinterpreted as<br />

two different species eg., D. griffithii – D. grandiflorus; D. turbinatus – D. gracilis.<br />

Considering this statement, it has to be checked whether D. turbinatus var. andamanica and<br />

D. andamanicus are synonyms of single species or distinguishably two separate species?<br />

Conclusions<br />

Analysis of the current research and other relevant studies taken in the study area<br />

substantially supported Dipterocarpaceae as one the chief family contributing a good<br />

proportion of stem density and basal area to the vegetation of Andaman Islands. Depending<br />

146


147<br />

PRASAD P. RAMA CHANDRA<br />

on the different sampling methods adopted, in different location of the Islands one or other<br />

species of Dipterocarpaceae dominated the site. A cumulative number of species belonging<br />

to the family were derived from the available literature, but still existence of certain species<br />

is doubtful, which needs further exploration. Towards this future, investigation should<br />

focus on detailed systematic family level studies, utilizing different sampling strategies in<br />

all the Islands of archipelago, to enumerate complete family species richness, their<br />

demographic status and uncertainty among the species citation. The study also showed poor<br />

regeneration status of the Dipterocarps. This is important to consider, especially for the<br />

endemic species D. alatus, in the NA whose adult population is also very low (Fig. 3). The<br />

low population of the species may be due to delayed flowering, poor / slower germination<br />

rate or unable to compete with the dominant species under closed canopy conditions or<br />

other unfavorable site conditions. The Andaman canopy lifting system developed for<br />

improving the regeneration patterns in Dipterocarps [CHENGAPPA, 1944] should be<br />

reconsidered with high priority to save the population of the species from entering into the<br />

status of threatened or extinct.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

The study utilized data from the project – Biodiversity characterization at<br />

landscape level in Andaman and Nicobar Islands using remote sensing and GIS under Jai<br />

vigyan science and technology mission project. Thanks are due to Dr. C. Sudhakar Reddy<br />

for his field expertise and to Dr. A. N. Sringeswara for his comments on the manuscript.<br />

References<br />

1. APPANAH S.1998. A Review of Dipterocarps: Taxonomy, ecology and silviculture Center for International<br />

Forestry Research Bogor, Indonesia, ISBN 979-8764-20-X.<br />

2. ASHTON P. S.1982. Dipterocarpaceae. Flora Malesiana, Series 1, 9: 237-552.<br />

3. BALAKRISHNAN N. P & NAIR N. G. 1977. New records of plants from Andaman and Nicobar Islands.<br />

Indian Forester, 103: 638-640.<br />

4. BASU S. K. 1990. Working plan for South Andaman Forest Division (Revision of D’Cruz and Sinha’s<br />

working plan), Andaman and Nicobar Administration, Department of Environment and Forest, Port<br />

Blair, India.<br />

5. BHARGAVA O. P. 1958. Tropical evergreen virgin forests of Andaman Islands. Indian Forester, 84(1): 20-<br />

29.<br />

6. BRAUN-BLANQUET J. 1932. Plant Sociology, New York.<br />

7. CHAMPION H. G. & SETH S. K. 1968. A revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. Govt. of India Press.<br />

8. CHAUHAN N. 2004. Mapping, monitoring and modeling of landscape for biodiversity characterization in<br />

Baratang Forest Division, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, University of Pune and Indian Institute of<br />

Remote Sensing (Dept of Space, Govt of India). India Ph.D thesis, unpublished.<br />

9. CHENGAPPA B. S. 1944. The Andaman forests and their regeneration. Indian Forester, 70: 9-12.<br />

10. CURTIS J. T & MCINTOSH R. P. 1950. The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic<br />

phytosociological characters. Ecology, 31: 435-455.<br />

11. DAGAR J. C. 1989. Endemic Plant species of Bay Islands. Journal of Andaman Science Association, 5: 161-<br />

168.<br />

12. DEVRAJ P. 2001. Forests of Andaman Islands, International book publishers, Dehradun.<br />

13. FISHER R. A. 1954. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver and Boyd.<br />

14. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANISATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS (FAO). 1985. Dipterocarps<br />

of South Asia. RAPA Monograph 4/85. FAO Regional Office for Asia and Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand.<br />

321 pp.<br />

15. HANDBOOK. 1983. 100 years of forest trees in Andaman; 1883 – 1993. Forest Department, Andaman and<br />

Nicobar Islands.


ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF DIPTEROCARPACEAE OF NORTH ANDAMAN FOREST, INDIA<br />

16. HANDBOOK. 2003. Biodiversity characterization at Landscape Level in Andaman and Nicobar Islands<br />

using Satellite Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System. Indian Institute of Remote<br />

Sensing, Dehradun.<br />

17. KUNDU S. R. 2008. A synopsis of Dipterocarpaceae in Indian subcontinent: Its distribution and endemism.<br />

Acta <strong>Botanica</strong> Hungarica, 50(1-2): 125-142.<br />

18. JACOBS M. 1981. Dipterocarpaceae, the taxonomic and distributional framework. In: Ng, F.S.P. (ed.)<br />

Proceedings of the Second International Round Table Conference on Dipterocarps. Malaysian Forester,<br />

44: 168-189.<br />

19. JHA LALIT KUMAR & SEN-SARMA P. K. 2008. Forest entomology APH Publishing. Nature, 387 pp.<br />

20. MANOKARAN N., LA FRANKIE JR. J. V, KOCHUMMEN K. M, QUAH E. S, KLAHN J. E, ASHTON<br />

P. S & HUBBELL S. P. 1990. IN: CHAN HT (ed) Methodology for the Fifty Hectare Research Plot at<br />

Pasoh Forest Reserve, pp 1–69. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Research Pamphlet, 104.<br />

21. MANOKARAN N. 1996. Effect, 34 years later, of selective logging in the lowland dipterocarp forest at<br />

Pasoh, Peninsular Malaysia, and implications on present day logging in the hill forests. Lee, S.S., May,<br />

D.Y., Gauld, I.D., Bishop, J. (Eds.), Conservation, Management and Development of Forest Resources.<br />

Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong: 41-60.<br />

22. MATHEW P. S., RADHA R. K, KRISHNAN N. P & SEENI S. 2010. Phytogeography of the Andaman–<br />

Nicobar Islands with special reference to Hornstedtia fenzlii (Kurz) K. Schum. Current Science, 98(7):<br />

905-907.<br />

23. MAURY-LECHON G. & CURTET L. 1998. Biogeography and Evolutionary Systematics of<br />

Dipterocarpaceae. In A Review of Dipterocarps: Taxonomy, ecology and silviculture Center for<br />

International Forestry Research Bogor, Indonesia ISBN 979-8764-20-X.<br />

24. NG F. S. P. 1966. Age at first flowering in Dipterocarps. The Malaysian Forester. 19: 290-295.<br />

25. PADALIA H., CHAUHAN N., PORWAL M. C. & ROY P. S. 2004. Phytosociological observations on tree<br />

species diversity of Andaman Islands, India. Current Science, 87(6): 799-806.<br />

26. PANAYOTOU T. & ASHTON P. S. 1992. Not by timber alone: economics and ecology for sustaining<br />

tropical forests. Island Press, Washington D.C.: 282 pp.<br />

27. PANDEY C. B, KANAK LATA, VENKATESH A. & MEDHI R. P. 2006. Diversity and species structure of<br />

home gardens in South Andaman. Tropical Ecology, 47(2): 251-258.<br />

28. POORE D. 1989. No timber without trees. Sustainability in the tropical forest. Earthscan Publications,<br />

London.<br />

29. PRASAD R. C. P., REDDY C. S. & DUTT C. B. S. 2007a Phytodiversity Assessment of Tropical Rainforest<br />

of North Andaman Islands, India. Research Journal of forestry, 1(1): 27-39.<br />

30. PRASAD R. C. P., REDDY C. S., RAJASEKHAR G. & DUTT C. B. S. 2007b. Mapping and Analyzing<br />

Vegetation Types of North Andaman Islands, India. GIS Development. 3(1). Available from:<br />

http://www.gisdevelopment.net/application/nrm/overview/over004_1.htm.<br />

31. PRASAD R. C. P., RAZA S. H., REDDY C. S. & DUTT C. B. S. 2008. Euphorbiaceae of North Andaman<br />

Forest – An Ecological and Phytosociological perspective. The Journal of Indian <strong>Botanica</strong>l Society,<br />

87(1&2): 1-3.<br />

32. PRASAD R. C. P., SRINGESWARA A. N., REDDY C. S., VIJAYAKUMARI P., VARALAKSHMI R. K.,<br />

RAZA S. H. & DUTT C. B. S. 2009a. Vegetation structure and ecological characteristics of North<br />

Andaman Forest, India. Biological Letters, 46(2): 51–67 doi: 10.2478/v10120-009-0006-0.<br />

33. PRASAD R. C. P., REDDY C. S., RAJAN K. S., RAZA S. H. & DUTT C. B. S. 2009b. Assessment of<br />

tsunami and anthropogenic impacts on the forest of the North Andaman Islands, India. International<br />

Journal of Remote Sensing, 30(5): 1235-1249.<br />

34. PRASAD R. C. P, RAJAN K. S., DUTT C. B. S & ROY P. S. 2010. A conceptual framework to analyse the<br />

Land-use / land-cover changes and its impact on phytodiversity – A case study of North Andaman<br />

Islands, India. Biodiversity and Conservation, doi 10.1007/s10531-010-9880-3. Published online<br />

http://www.springerlink.com/content/h48n576106k09485/fulltext.pdf.<br />

35. RASINGAM L. & PARTHASARATHY N. 2009. Diversity of under storey plants in undisturbed and<br />

disturbed tropical lowland forests of Little Andaman Island, India. Biodiversity Conservation, 18(4):<br />

1045-1065.<br />

36. RAJKUMAR M. & PARTHASARATHY N. 2008. Tree Diversity and Structure of Andaman Giant<br />

Evergreen Forests, India. Taiwania, 53(4): 356-368.<br />

37. REDDY C. S. & PRASAD R. C. P. 2008. Tree flora of Saddle Peak National Park, Andaman, India. Journal<br />

of Plant Sciences, 3(1) 1-17.<br />

38. REDDY C. S., PRASAD R. C. P. & DUTT C. B. S. 2008. Additions to the Flora of Andaman & Nicobar<br />

Islands, India. Journal of Bombay Natural. History Society, 104(3): 379-382.<br />

148


149<br />

PRASAD P. RAMA CHANDRA<br />

39. REDDY C. S., PRASAD R. C. P., MURTHY M. S. R. & DUTT C. B. S. 2004. Census of endemic flowering<br />

plants of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany, 28(3): 712-728.<br />

40. SHIVA M. P. & JANTAN I. 1998. Non-Timber Forest Products from Dipterocarps. In A Review of<br />

Dipterocarps: Taxonomy, ecology and silviculture Center for International Forestry Research Bogor,<br />

Indonesia ISBN 979-8764-20-X.<br />

41. SHIN T. & KYI T. 2010. Some important Myanmar species of genus Dipterocarpus and their potential<br />

towards poverty alleviation. Available from www.apafri.org/8thdip/Session%205/S5_ThantShin.html<br />

accessed on 18th July, 2010.<br />

42. SINGH M. P., SINGH B. S. & DEY S. 2002. Plant Biodiversity and Taxonomy Viii, 260 P, ISBN, New<br />

Delhi.<br />

43. SYMINGTON C. F. 1943. Foresters manual of dipterocarps. Forest Department, Kuala Lumpur. 244 pp.<br />

44. TEWARY P. K. & SARKAR A. K. 1987. The genus Shorea Roxb. ex Gaertn. (Dipterocarpaceae) in India.<br />

Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany, 11: 103-114<br />

45. THOTHATHRI K. 1961.New records of plants from Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Journal of Bombay<br />

Natural. History Society, 58: 310-317.<br />

46. THOTHATHRI K. 1962. Contribution to the flora of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Bulletin of<br />

<strong>Botanica</strong>l Survey of India, 4, 281-296: 1-8.<br />

47. TRIPATHI K. P, TRIPATHI S., SELVEN T., KUMAR K., SINGH K. K, MEHROTRA S.,<br />

PUSHPANGADAN P. 2004. Community structure and species diversity of Saddle Peak forests in<br />

Andaman Island. Tropical Ecology, 45(2): 241-250.<br />

48. TROUP R. S. 1921. Siliviculture of Indian Trees. Revised. Edition 1. Delhi. Controller of Publication, 1975.<br />

49. VASUDEVA RAO M. K. 2004. The importance of botanical nomenclature and synonymy in taxonomy and<br />

biodiversity. Current Science, 87(5): 602-606.<br />

50. WAITE S. 2000. Statistical Ecology in Practice. A Guide to Analysing Environmental and Ecological Field<br />

Data. Pearson Education.<br />

51. WHITMORE T. C. 1988. Forest types and forest zonation. In: Earl of Cranbrook (ed.) Malaysia, 20-30. Key<br />

Environments Series. Pergamon Press, Oxford.<br />

52. WYATT-SMITH J. 1963. Manual of Malayan silviculture for inland forests, Vol. 1. Malayan Forest Record<br />

no. 23. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong.<br />

53. http://www.biotik.org/laos/species/d/dipob/dipob_en.html#Distribution – accessed on 18 th July, 2010.


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 151-157<br />

151<br />

DEREVENKO TATIANA<br />

EX SITU CONSERVATION OF SAUSSUREA PORCII DEGEN IN Y.<br />

FEDKOVYCH NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BOTANIC GARDEN<br />

DEREVENKO TATIANA 1<br />

Abstract: The International Agenda for Botanic Gardens in Conservation emphasizes on conservation of rare<br />

species ex situ as the main task and its aim is the creation of a reserve stock for the possibility of<br />

active recovery in nature. We have introduced in the culture and first have been studied rhythm of<br />

phenological development and flowering, depending on weather conditions, seed production and<br />

added guidelines for breeding the endangered Eastern Carpathians endemic species - Saussurea<br />

porcii Degen, which is listed in the Red Data Book of Ukraine and the European List of Globally<br />

Threatened Animals and Plants. We have created a field bank S. porcii – it is our contribution to the<br />

conservation of plant diversity.<br />

Key words: Saussurea porcii Degen, ex situ conservation, Red Data Book of Ukraine, a field bank, the biology<br />

of developing<br />

Introduction<br />

The Global Strategy for Plant Conservation states that the conservation of living<br />

plants collections of endangered species of regional floras, especially endemics, as the most<br />

vulnerable is very important. [GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR PLANT CONSERVATION,<br />

2002]. From the Carpathian region`s 219 endemic taxons [ТАСЄНКЕВИЧ, 2006] in the<br />

collections of CHNU Botanic Garden today are saved specimens of 11. Saussurea porcii<br />

Degen is the Eastern Carpathians endemic, which has the phylogenetic relationships of<br />

Siberia. In Ukraine it is distributed in: Chornogora mountain range (Polonyna Rogneska,<br />

ur. Primaratik), the upper Chornyi and Bilyi Cheremosh (Mountain Gnetesa, polonyna<br />

Glystuvata, between polonynas Glystuvata and Preluky). In Romanian Carpathians it has<br />

been cited from the Maramureşului Mountains (at Borşa and Lanul Cercănel<br />

[ŞTEFUREAC, 1971], and in Rodna Mountains (on the Mountain of Corongiş, under the<br />

rocks called “Porţii”, as well as on the opposite slope of it [ŞTEFUREAC, 1971;<br />

NYÁRÁDY, 1933]. This species is listed as disappearing into the Red Data Book of<br />

Ukraine [ДІДУХ, 2009], as critically endangered (CR) in Ukraine and as extinct (EX) in<br />

Romania – accordingly to the Red Data Book of Carpathians [ТАСЄНКЕВИЧ, 2002], as<br />

endangered (EN), in the European List of Globally Threatened Animals and Plants (1991).<br />

Today are known only 6 populations of S. porcii in the Carpathian Mountains [БАГЛЕЙ &<br />

ДАНИЛИК, 2009], mostly on wetlands in the crooked green alder in the subalpine zone. It<br />

needs to establish reserves to protect it. Basically, it has a small populations numbering<br />

1<br />

Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University Botanic Garden, Fedkovych 11, 58022, Chernivtsi – Ukraine,<br />

e-mail: tderevenko@ua.fm


EX SITU CONSERVATION OF SAUSSUREA PORCII DEGEN IN Y. FEDKOVYCH NATIONAL …<br />

from 400 to 1000 individuals. The most numerous one has several thousand individuals and<br />

occupying an area of several tens of hectares on the polonyna Glystuvata (the Chyvchyn<br />

Mountains) (Fig. 1). Only this population from all has a high level vitality constituent<br />

individuals (Fig. 2) [БАГЛЕЙ, 2011].<br />

Currently, only CHNU Botanic Gardens living collection present some specimens<br />

of S. porcii, unlike all the botanical gardens of Ukraine [ЛЕБЕДА, 2011].<br />

Material and methods<br />

Saussurea porcii Degen is a hemikryptophyte, herbaceous perennial plant, to 80<br />

cm height, with sessile lanceolate leaves, forming wings along the stem and inflorescence<br />

corymbose. From polonyna Glystuvata locality the planting material has been introduced<br />

CHNU Botanic Gardens, in 2007. In the Botanic Garden a place in partial shade for<br />

planting S. porcii, and a high soil moisture provided by regular watering this populationlocus<br />

was chosed (Fig. 3).<br />

Monitoring the phenological stages was carried out by conventional methods,<br />

recommended by the <strong>Botanica</strong>l Gardens of USSR Council [МЕТОДИКА<br />

ФЕНОЛОГИЧЕСКИХ НАБЛЮДЕНИЙ В БОТАНИЧЕСКИХ САДАХ СССР, 1979],<br />

and mathematical processing of phenological observations were carried out according to the<br />

method of the Central <strong>Botanica</strong>l Garden [КРАТКОЕ ПОСОБИЕ ПО<br />

МАТЕМАТИЧЕСКОЙ ОБРАБОТКЕ ДАННЫХ ФЕНОЛОГИЧЕСКИХ<br />

НАБЛЮДЕНИЙ, 1972]. The study of seed production was carried out according to the<br />

guidelines by Т. О. RABOTNOV [РАБОТНОВ, 1992] and VAYNAGY [ВАЙНАГИЙ,<br />

1974].<br />

Results and discussions<br />

The International Agenda for Botanic Gardens in Conservation emphasizes that<br />

conservation of rare species ex situ is the main task and its aim is the creation of a reserve<br />

stock for the possibility of active recovery in nature [МЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯ<br />

ПРОГРАММА БОТАНИЧЕСКИХ САДОВ ПО ОХРАНЕ РАСТЕНИЙ, 2000]. As for<br />

successful repatriation should be explored more fully the biological characteristics, which is<br />

possible only in ex situ conditions, we are studying the biology of developing and<br />

reproduction of S. porcii and it is a preparatory stage to the restoration in nature.<br />

The results of the study of phenological rhythm of S. porcii in the collection of the<br />

CHNU Botanic Garden during 2007 – 2011 years are presented in Tab. 1. In the spring, S.<br />

porcii begins growing season in CHNU Botanic Garden in early April, when average daily<br />

air temperature did not fall below +5 ºC, the bud of resumption elongates, shoots and leaves<br />

starts to grow. About a week after the stable transition of mean daily air temperatures over<br />

+10 ºC an inflorescences are formed in the generative shoots, on average, this occurs early<br />

in the second decade of May, often coinciding with the transition of daily average<br />

temperatures over +15 ºC. From the beginning of growing season before the flowering<br />

passes near 88 days (Table 2). It comes into flower in the last third of June – mid of July,<br />

until early of August. The earliest onset of phenophases had been observed in 2009 – the<br />

152


153<br />

DEREVENKO TATIANA<br />

first decade of June, when flowering time was 1.5 months, which is obviously connected<br />

with the early spring practically without a rain right up to June and the second wave of<br />

drought lasted from July to early October. The average duration of flowering S. porcii over<br />

the years of observation was 33 days. The shortest flowering period noted in 2010 was of<br />

18 days, due to the fact that the average air temperature during the flowering time was<br />

approximately 3 ºC above normal and reached 23.2 ± 0.7 ºC. Inflorescences of S. porcii<br />

(Fig. 4) have a diameter from 2.5 to 7.5 cm, and a height from 4.5 to 11 cm; on average the<br />

inflorescences are composed of 30 botryoidal florets (from 15 to 60), each predominantly<br />

having 9 disk florets (rarely 7 or 10). In the florescence of disc florets clearly are observed<br />

2 phases, namely: staminale and carpellary one. We determined the duration of each phases<br />

in sunny weather and at average air temperatures about 20 ºC, starting by staminale phase,<br />

which lasts about 24 hours; after drying the stamens begins carpellary phase and lasts about<br />

24 hours, too. Thus, about 20 hours lasts phase of the budding and florescence of disk<br />

florets actually lasts about 2 days.<br />

We have observed there are infected plants by aphids in a phase of active growth<br />

of the inflorescence before flowering, which resulted in shrinkage of the tops of generative<br />

shoots and, accordingly, to a lack of florescence in 50% of generative shoots in the culture.<br />

Seeds of S. porcii begin to ripen from mid August and by the end of it,<br />

dissemination is finish. Seeds are dark brown in color, having an oblong shape, slightly<br />

flattened at the sides, length from 0.72 to 0.62 cm and a diameter from 0.11 to 0.15 cm.<br />

Weight of 1000 seeds is about 1.400 Kg.<br />

As an important indicator of the life of rare plants ex situ is their ability of<br />

generative reproduction. We investigated the seed production (SP) of generative shoots (a<br />

number of mature seed). In situ depending on the vitality of population SP ranges from<br />

153.8 ± 2.01 to 280.2 ± 3.75 [БАГЛЕЙ, 2009]. In the CHNU Botanic Garden this number<br />

is fluctuating between 10 and 135, with an average of 55.4 ± 7.8. Study of ex situ seed<br />

production coefficient (SPC) have found that mature seeds are formed only at 1/3 (32.4%)<br />

from all number of seed germs in each generative shoots of S. porcii. Well known is that<br />

the number of seed germs have a genetically fixed value and therefore varies considerably,<br />

with lower limits than the number mature seeds, which depends on a large number of<br />

different factors of exogenous and endogenous origin. The second level is repeated it again<br />

- the number of flowers in generative shoots (in the inflorescence) varies far less than the<br />

number of mature fruits. Both figures are in varying degrees depending on the specific<br />

conditions of growth of individuals of a particular species. In our case, such difference<br />

between seed productivity in nature (in situ) and in culture (ex situ) can be explained by the<br />

fact that the culture reduce the florescence period (only part of the flowers makes seeds,<br />

and the rest remains in various bud stages). Partly, it is a consequence of not perfect<br />

condition for cultivation of S. porcii, and partly - the result of the impact of weather<br />

conditions, and a certain lack of pollinators. In any case, it's an interesting question, and it<br />

requires additional and parallel studies, both in nature and cultivation.<br />

In June and July at the base of the shoots, virginal and generative individuals are<br />

formed, from 3 to 7 resumptions buds. The growing season lasts an average about 200 days,


EX SITU CONSERVATION OF SAUSSUREA PORCII DEGEN IN Y. FEDKOVYCH NATIONAL …<br />

and finishes with the start of frost in late October – early November. Maximum seed<br />

germination was 83% in the autumn, sowing in boxes with a soil mix of deoxidized peat,<br />

leaf soil and sand. More than 70% of the seedlings in their second year become the<br />

generative phase of development.<br />

Conclusions<br />

We have introduced in the culture the endangered Eastern Carpathians endemic<br />

species of Saussurea porcii Degen. In accordance with our program of restore the nature<br />

populations of endangered plant species, we have created a field bank of S. porcii. To<br />

restore the disturbed populations should only correctly collect seeds and sow it, and through<br />

a growing season will have a representative genetic planting material. And that is important<br />

– without the high financial costs. Implementation of this program in the CHNU Botanic<br />

Garden is our contribution to the conservation of plant diversity and compliance with<br />

international obligations of Ukraine in the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation.<br />

References<br />

1. БАГЛЕЙ О. В. 2011. Демографічні дослідження популяцій видів роду Saussurea DC. в Українських<br />

Карпатах. Матеріали ХІІІ з’їзду Українського ботанічного товариства (19-23 вересня 2011 р.,<br />

м. Львів). Львів, 102 c.<br />

2. БАГЛЕЙ О. & ДАНИЛИК І. 2009. Еколого-біологічні особливості інсуляризованих популяцій<br />

Saussurea porcii Degen (Asteraceae) в Українських Карпатах. Науковий вісник НЛТУ України,<br />

19(4): 67-71.<br />

3. ВАЙНАГИЙ И. 1974. О методике семенной продуктивности растений. Ботан. журн., 59(6): 826-831.<br />

4. ЛЕБЕДA A. (ред). 2011. Каталог раритетних рослин ботанічних садів і дендропарків України:<br />

Довідковий посібник. Київ: Академперіодика, 184 с. ISBN 978-966-360-173-1.<br />

5. NYÁRÁDY E. I. 1933. Adnotaţiuni la flora României. VIII. Bul. Grăd. Bot. Muz. Bot., Univ. Cluj, XIII(1-<br />

4): 67-77.<br />

6. РАБОТНОВ Т. 1992. Фитоценология: Уч. Пособие. Москва: Издательство МГУ, 352 с.<br />

7. ŞTEFUREAC Tr. 1971. Consideraţii generale asupra caracterului florei din ţinutul Maramureşului. Com.<br />

Bot., S.S.B./a VII-a Consf. Naţ. de Geobot. - Satu Mare, Maramureş, 1969: 95-123 + 14 fig.<br />

8. ТАСЕНКЕВИЧ Л. 2002. Червоний список судинних рослин Карпат. Львів., 29 с.<br />

9. ТАСЄНКЕВИЧ Л. 2006. Природна флора судинних рослин Карпат, її особливості та генезис.<br />

Автореф. дис…д-ра біол. наук. Київ, 25 с.<br />

10. ДІДУХ Я. (ред.). 2009. Червона Книга України: Рослинний світ. Київ: Глобалконсалтінг, 900 с. ISBN<br />

978-966-97059-1-4.<br />

11. ***1972. Краткое пособие по математической обработке данных фенологических наблюдений. – М.:<br />

АН СССР, Глав. Ботан. Сад, Совет бот. Садов СССР, 10 с.<br />

12. ***1979. Методика фенологических наблюдений в ботанических садах СССР. Бюлл. Глав. Ботан.<br />

Сада. М.: Наука, Вып. 113: 3-8.<br />

13. ***1991. European List of Globally Threatened Animals and Plants. New York, 153 pp.<br />

14. ***2000. Международная программа ботанических садов по охране растений. Рус. перев. М., 58 с.<br />

15. ***2002. Global strategy for Plant Conservation. Montreal, 19 pp.<br />

154


Tab. 1. Saussurea porcii Degen rhythm of development in the collection of CHNU Botanic Garden<br />

Year/ Beginning Formation of<br />

Beginning of Full ripening End of Duration of<br />

Efflorescence Mass flowering End of flowering<br />

statistics of grows flower stalk<br />

ripening of seeds vegetation vegetation<br />

2007 - 27. V 24. VI 5. VII 13.VIII 9.VIII 21.VIII 3.XII -<br />

2008 11.IV 19.V 30.VI 7. VII 26. VII 10. VIII 27. VIII 22.X 194<br />

2009 1.IV 21.IV 2.VІ 23.VI 15.VII 7.VIII 28.VIII 27.X 209<br />

2010 4.IV 5.V 11.VII 15.VII 28.VII 15.VIII 30. VIII 18.X 197<br />

2011 30.III 21.V 16.VII 19.VII 10. VIII 13. VIII 31. VIII 25.X 209<br />

M±2m 3.IV±5,7 12.V±13,1 27.VI±15,4 6.VII±9,0 31.VII±10,5 11.VIII±2,8 28.VIII±3,7 31.X±16,6 202,3±7,9<br />

V 6.1 11.0 9.6 5.3 5.5 1.4 1.7 6.1 3.9<br />

Tab. 2. Climatic data during the Saussurea porcii Degen flowering in the collection of CHNU Botanic Garden<br />

Number of<br />

Flowering period T ºС of air during the flowering<br />

The number of Σ<br />

Year/<br />

days before<br />

days with precipitation<br />

statistics<br />

Efflorescence End of flowering Duration Max Min M ± m<br />

flowering<br />

precipitation (mm)<br />

2007 - 24.VI 13.VIII 51 36.9 10.0 20.8±0.5 15 86.1<br />

2008 81 30.VI 26.VII 27 32.3 9.9 19.5±0.5 20 185.8<br />

2009 63 2.VI 15.VII 44 31.7 8.2 19.4±0.5 22 103.8<br />

2010 99 11.VII 28.VII 18 32.6 12.9 23.2±0.7 7 53.7<br />

2011 109 16.VII 10. VIII 26 33.1 10.3 20.4±0.5 17 123.6<br />

М±m 88 ± 10.2 33.2 ± 6,1 33.3 ± 0.9 10.3 ± 0.8 20.7 ± 0.7 16.2 ± 2.6 110.6 ± 22.0<br />

М±2m 27.VI ± 15,4 31.VII ± 10.5<br />

DEREVENKO TATIANA<br />

V 23.1 9.6 5.5 41.4 6.2 16.5 7.5 35.8 44.5<br />

155


EX SITU CONSERVATION OF SAUSSUREA PORCII DEGEN IN Y. FEDKOVYCH NATIONAL …<br />

Fig. 1. The population of Saussurea porcii Degen on the polonyna Glystuvata<br />

(foto by Vacyl Budjac)<br />

Fig. 2. Saussurea porcii Degen in situ<br />

(foto by Vacyl Budjac)<br />

156


Fig. 3. Saussurea porcii Degen ex situ (in CHNU Botanic Garden)<br />

Fig. 4. The inflorescens of Saussurea porcii Degen in situ<br />

(foto by Vacyl Budjac)<br />

157<br />

DEREVENKO TATIANA


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 159-167<br />

BISHT POONAM, PRASAD PRATTI, NAUTIYAL BHAGWATI PRASAD<br />

POLYGONATUM VERTICILLATUM (LINN.) ALL. AND<br />

POLYGONATUM CIRRHIFOLIUM (WALL.) ROYLE: TWO<br />

THREATENED VITAL HEALERS FROM ASTHAVERGA<br />

NURTURED BY GARHWAL HIMALAYA, INDIA<br />

BISHT POONAM 1 , PRASAD PRATTI 1 , NAUTIYAL BHAGWATI PRASAD 2<br />

Abstract: The biodiversity of Garhwal Himalaya supports a large number of medicinal plants used in various<br />

ailments as a drug. Polygonatum verticillatum and Polygonatum cirrhifolium, the healers from<br />

'Asthaverga' of 'Ayurveda', are reported from Garhwal Himalaya, but due to overexploitation are<br />

encompassed in threatened category. The present study is a documentation of these plants to facilitate<br />

the conservation of these crude drugs in their natural habitat and to domesticate them. The study also<br />

provides information regarding the resident’s outlook, living in surrounding area of these species,<br />

towards these species.<br />

Key words: conservation, medicinal, Polygonatum verticillatum, Polygonatum cirrhifolium<br />

Introduction<br />

India possesses the world's richest medicinal plant heritage and traditional and<br />

local knowledge and Himalaya is one of the mega biodiversity regions of the world<br />

[HEYWOOD, 2000]. The Indian Himalayan region (IHR) supports over 1748 (32.2% of<br />

India) plant species of known medicinal value [SAMANT, 1998]. The Garhwal Himalaya<br />

has been a centre of spiritual knowledge, religiosity and pilgrimage from ancient times and<br />

it is also rich in biodiversity. Polygonatum verticillatum and Polygonatum cirrhifolium are<br />

the two medicinal enticers from this goblet of biodiversity and key ingredients of<br />

'Ashtaverga' of 'Ayurveda'.<br />

Material and methods<br />

The present manuscript was prepared by extensive literature survey of documented<br />

directories and a field survey was also conducted to verify the documentations.<br />

The study was carried out in two districts of Uttarakhand viz. Pauri and<br />

Rudraprayag. Rudraprayag district covering an area of about 2439 sq. km lies between<br />

latitude 30°19' and 30°49' North and longitude 78°49' and 79°21'13" East. The climate<br />

varies from sub-tropical monsoon type (mild inter, hot summer) to tropical upland type<br />

(mild winter, dry winter, short warm summer). The soils are natural, dynamic,<br />

heterogeneous, non-renewable resource, which support plant and animal life<br />

[ANONYMOUS, 2009]. Pauri encompasses an area of 5230 sq. km and situated between<br />

1 High Altitude Plant Physiology Research Centre (HAPPRC), HNB Garhwal University, Srinagar (Garhwal), 246<br />

174, Uttarakhand – India, e-mail: bishtpoonam81@gmail.com<br />

2 Department of Horticulture, Aromatic and Medicinal Plants (HAMP), School of ES & NRM, Mizoram<br />

University, Aizawl, 796 009, Mizoram – India<br />

159


POLYGONATUM VERTICILLATUM (LINN.) ALL. AND POLYGONATUM CIRRHIFOLIUM (WALL.) …<br />

Latitude 29°45' to 30°15' North and 78°24' to 79°23' Longitude East. The region has a subtemperate<br />

to temperate climate, which remains pleasant throughout the year. The soils are<br />

derived from rocks and terraces present are silt to clayey loam and are very fertile<br />

[ANONYMOUS, 2011].<br />

Local people were interviewed randomly concerning the local uses of the plants<br />

under study. During the interviews local name of the plants, parts used and formulations<br />

were asked (see Appendix). These participants were then divided into three groups<br />

according to the age groups and gender viz. category I (male 25-50 years), category II<br />

(male 51-90 years) and category III (female 25-90 years).<br />

Result and discussion<br />

Privileged Garhwal Himalaya<br />

The hills of Uttarakhand, standing almost centrally in the long sweep of Himalaya,<br />

are also known as the 'Garh-Kum' region [KANDARI & GUSAIN, 2001]. Garhwal<br />

Himalaya lies between 77°33’5” to 80°6’ E longitude and 29°31’9” to 31°26’5” N latitude<br />

[NAND & KUMAR, 1989]. Thus the Garhwal region enjoys a wide range of altitudes<br />

extending from about 325 m in the Bhabar tract to the height of about 7,817 m forming the<br />

Nanda Devi peak of the Greater Himalaya or Himadri [KANDARI & GUSAIN, 2001]. The<br />

Garhwal Himalayas due to its distinct meteorological, geographic, geological and<br />

ecological patterns is rich in bio-resources as well as diverse flora and fauna [GAIROLA &<br />

BISWAS, 2008]. The high altitude regions of Uttarakhand Himalayas can be divided into<br />

three main climatic zones viz. alpine, temperate and sub-tropical [SHAH & JIAN, 1988].<br />

The alpine zone which ranges between 2500 to 4000 m is rich in wild medicinal plants like<br />

Angelica glauca, A. archangelica, Dactylorhiza hatagirea, Carum carvi, Picrorhiza<br />

kurroa, Aconitum heterophyllum, Nardostachys jatamansi, Saussurea lapa, Podophyllum<br />

hexandrum, Rheum emodi, R. moorcroftianum, Aconitum balfourii, Swertia spp. etc. The<br />

temperate zone commencing from 1000 to 2700 m elevation is rich in many orchids of<br />

medicinal importance, Rhododendron arboreum, Corylus jackmontii, Hippophae<br />

rhamnoides, Polygonatum verticillatum, P. cirrhifolium, Hypericum oblongifolium,<br />

Arisaema intermedium, Hedychium spicatum etc. The sub-tropical zone is the region<br />

existing in the valleys of the temperate zone. They are not characterized by as rich a variety<br />

of medicinal plants but they also account for the bio diversity of the state [ANONYMOUS,<br />

2002]. The medicinal plant diversity available in tropical belt mainly incorporates:<br />

Embelica officinalis, Terminalia chebula, T. bellirica, Cinnamomum tamala, Zanthoxylum<br />

alatum, Berberis ssp., Rubus elliptcus, Gloriosa superba, Withania somnifera, Rauvolfia<br />

serpentina, Aloe vera etc. [KANDARI & GUSAIN, 2001].<br />

Verve of “Ayurveda”<br />

The literal meaning of "Ayurveda" is (Ayur = life and veda = knowledge) the way<br />

or science of life. Ayurveda (1000-500 BC) originated from our ancient literature –<br />

“Atherva-veda”, the knowledge of which was documented in 'Charak–Samhita' (1000 BC)<br />

and ‘Sushruta-Samhita’ and are considered to be the authentic books. “Ayurveda” may be<br />

said to be a treasure house of knowledge about medicinal plants. All of the plants which are<br />

used for their medicinal properties have been thoroughly evaluated and classified for<br />

thousand of years. It is an ancient philosophy based on a deep understanding of eternal<br />

truths about the human body, mind and spirit. Unlike orthodox medicine, it is not based on<br />

160


BISHT POONAM, PRASAD PRATTI, NAUTIYAL BHAGWATI PRASAD<br />

the frequently changing findings of specific research projects, but rather on permanent,<br />

wise, eternal principals of living [GODAGAMA & HODGKINSON, 1997].<br />

"Ayurveda" is bestowed with "Asthaverga" a group of eight plants used as tonic<br />

which promotes body heat, dries up serious fluids, carminative and antitussive, and are<br />

useful in vitiated conditions of pitta and vata, agalactia, seminal weakness, internal and<br />

external haemorrhages, cough, bronchitis, burning sensation and general debility. These<br />

eight plants belongs to two families, 'Liliaceae' comprising mahameda (P. verticillatum),<br />

meda (P. cirrhifolium), kakoli (Roscoea alpina/purpurea), ksheerakakoli (Lilium<br />

pollyphyllum), and 'Orchidaceae' comprising jeevak (Malaxis acuminata), rishibhak (M.<br />

muscifera), riddhi (Habenaria edgeworthii), vriddhi (H. intermedia) [VARIER, 1995].<br />

Introduction to the plants<br />

Polygonatum is a genus of erect or decumbent perennial herbs belonging to family<br />

Liliaceae and distributed in the temperate regions of the northern hemisphere. Thick fleshy<br />

creeping sympodial rhizomes characterize the genus. According to MILLER (1754) the<br />

generic name of Polygonatum is derived from the character of the rhizome which resembles<br />

much as yovi, a Knee, because it has many little Knees. LINNAEUS (1753) listed three<br />

species of Polygonatum under the genus Convallaria, namely, C. verticillata, C.<br />

polygonatum and C. multiflora in his book 'Species Plantarum' .These were treated under<br />

the generic name Polygonatum by ALLIONI (1785). In the natural system of classification<br />

of BENTHAM & HOOKER (1862-1883) family liliaceae was classified in the series<br />

Coronarieae.<br />

The systematic position of Polygonatum according to phylogenetic system of<br />

classification of HUTCHINSON (1973) was:<br />

Phylum: Angiospermae<br />

Subphylum: Monocotyledons<br />

Divison: Corolliferae<br />

Order: Liliales<br />

Family: Liliaceae<br />

Genus: Polygonatum<br />

Polygonatum is represented by 57 species in the world concentrated in Himalayas<br />

[OHARA & al. 2007]. Out of the species occurring in IHR two are imperative ingredients<br />

of Asthaverga.<br />

Polygonatum verticillatum (Linn.) All. syn. Convallaria verticillata (Linn.), is<br />

known as whorled Solomon’s seal in English and locally known as mitha dudhia<br />

[NAUTIYAL & NAUTIYAL, 2004] and Kantula [GAUR, 1999]. The species is<br />

recognized as ‘mahameda’ in Ayurveda and in Sanskrit as Tridanti, Devamani and<br />

Vasuchhidra (Fig. 1). It is an erect tall herb, 60-120 cm high. Leaves are whorled, sessile,<br />

10-20 cm long, linear or lanceolate, acute or rarely tip carcinate, glaucous beneath,<br />

occasionally ciliolate on margins and veins. Flowers are white, pinkish white or pale green,<br />

in whorled racemes, rarely lilac. The flowering and fruiting takes place in the month of<br />

June to October. This species is found in the temperate Himalayas at altitudes of 1800-3900<br />

m amsl. From Garhwal Himalaya P. verticillatum was reported from Bhuna, Dunagiri and<br />

Niti by NAITHANI (1984), Binsar by GAUR (1999), Tungnath, Rudranath, Valley of<br />

Flowers and Dayara by VASHISTHA (2006).<br />

Polygonatum cirrhifolium (Wall.) Royle syn. Convallaria cirrhifolia Wall. another<br />

member of Asthaverga recognized as King's Solomon’s seal in English, locally as Khakan<br />

161


POLYGONATUM VERTICILLATUM (LINN.) ALL. AND POLYGONATUM CIRRHIFOLIUM (WALL.) …<br />

[GAUR, 1999], ‘meda’ in Ayurveda, Dhara, Manichhidra and Svalpaparni in Sanskrit (Fig.<br />

2). It is also a tall erect, perennial herb, 60-120 cm high with whorled (3-6) sessile, linear<br />

leaves having tendril like tips. Flowers white, green purplish or pink on short stocks and the<br />

fruit is round blue-black berry found in the temperate Himalayas at the altitudes of 1200-<br />

4200 m. Rhizomes are thick and fleshy. In Garhwal, NAITHANI (1984) reported it from<br />

Gulabkoti, Sitapur and Sutul while Gaur (1999) from Khirsu.<br />

Fig. 1. P. verticillatum: Leaf pattern<br />

Fig. 2. P. cirrhifolium: Leaf pattern<br />

162


BISHT POONAM, PRASAD PRATTI, NAUTIYAL BHAGWATI PRASAD<br />

About 'mahameda' and 'meda' it was documented in "Abhinav niguntu" that 'meda'<br />

initiate from the same place from where 'mahameda' originates, simply implying that both<br />

Polygonatum verticillatum and P. cirrhifolium grows together. The term 'meda' used in both<br />

the species symbolize the 'mucilage' present inside the rhizomes of these plant species.<br />

Several workers explore these two species of 'Asthaverga' either together or individually<br />

[VARIER, 1995; SINGH, 2006; HUSSAIN & HORE, 2008]. SZYBKA-HRYNKIEWICZ<br />

&JANECZKO (2004) studied the effect of plant growth regulators and steroidal hormone on<br />

a quantity of diosgenin in callus tissue of P. verticillatum. In another study they examined the<br />

effect of coconut water (CW), plant growth regulators, and steroidal hormones on callus of P.<br />

verticillatum. Despite underground parts recently above ground aerial parts of P. verticillatum<br />

are also tested for insecticidal and leishmanicidal properties [SAEED & al. 2010].<br />

Polygonatum is a complex genus with a wide range of chromosome counts (2n =<br />

16, 18, 20, 21 22, 24, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 36, 38, 40, 42, 46, 59, 56, 60, 62, 64, 66, 84, 86–<br />

91, 90) [LATOO & al. 2005]. In India, chromosome numbers reported for P. cirrhifolium<br />

are 2n = 38 (Shimla), 26 (North Sikkim), 28 (Northeast Sikkim) and 56 (China hills,<br />

Western Burma) [KUMAR, 1959b, 1959c, 1960, 1964–1965]. LATOO & al. (2005)<br />

established a new chromosome number in P. cirrhifolium i.e. 2n = 32. The most common<br />

chromosome number for P. verticillatum is n = 28. Although, one tetraploid strain with 2n<br />

= 60 chromosomes and two hexaploid strains with 2n = 90 chromosomes have been<br />

encountered [THERMAN, 1953].<br />

Curative assets of the plants<br />

Collectively, meda and mahameda are used as tonic and promotes body heat, dries<br />

up serious fluids, carminative and antitussive. Both species are used against loss of vigor,<br />

pain in the kidney and hips, swelling and fullness in the abdominal region, accumulation of<br />

fluids in bone joints, skin eruptions and cough [NAUTIYAL & NAUTIYAL, 2004].<br />

Individually, Polygonatum verticillatum is eaten raw or cooked, the powder is<br />

given for gastric complaints, and the paste applied to wounds [NAUTIYAL & al. 1998;<br />

GAUR, 1999]. The rhizome is valued as salep, a strength giving food. The plants possess<br />

diuretic properties and the rhizome of this species is eaten as food in the Kurram valley<br />

[ANONYMOUS, 1969]. It contains digitalis glucoside, saponosides A, B, C and D, lysine,<br />

serine, aspartic acid and threonine [ANONYMOUS, 1969]. SOOD & al. (2005) mentioned<br />

rhizomes contain diosgenin.<br />

Similarly, P. cirrhifolium is reported to be used as a tonic and vulnerary. A root<br />

infusion with milk is used as an aphrodisiac and blood purifier for tumors and piles.<br />

According to report of ANONYMOUS (2003), it is useful in burning sensation, skin<br />

diseases wounds, ulcers, tuberculosis, fever, cough, bronchitis and general debility.<br />

Investigations in China have reported hypoglycemic, hypotensive, antibacterial and<br />

antifungal effects of P. cirrhifolium [SINGH, 2006]. Rhizomes contain starch, protein,<br />

pectin and aspargin [NAUTIYAL & NAUTIYAL, 2004]. It was also reported to be used in<br />

major ayurvedic formulations like Asoka Ghrta, Sivagutika, Amrtaprasa Ghrta, Dasam,<br />

ularista, Dhanvantara Taila, Brhatmasa Taila, Mahanarayana Taila, Vasacandanadi Taila.<br />

In the survey it was found that people included in category I were less aware about<br />

the plant and its uses while the category II was a combination of people who recognize the<br />

plant or were familiar about the uses of plants or the parts used for making formulations.<br />

The participants included in category III were least aware about the plant and its uses.<br />

Although, how to prepare formulations was unknown by most of the participants.<br />

163


POLYGONATUM VERTICILLATUM (LINN.) ALL. AND POLYGONATUM CIRRHIFOLIUM (WALL.) …<br />

The vaidyas of both of the districts however recognize the habitat, uses, parts of<br />

plant used and how to prepare various formulations. These vaidyas were the local healers<br />

which cure the people from diseases. In olden times they were the only people to cure the<br />

inhabitants later medicinal facilities were provided by the Government, so now doctors<br />

were there for treatment of the inhabitants. But these vaidyas still heal the residents in far<br />

flung areas. Since earlier only vaidyas were aware about the distribution and methods of<br />

preparation therefore they limit the knowledge to themselves for the sake of their profession<br />

and to protect the plants from overexploitation by the villagers. Only the son or student who<br />

takeover the profession after the existing vaidyas was given the information regarding the<br />

distribution, identification, plant and part used, formulations and doses.<br />

Threat of Extinction<br />

It is accountable that Garhwal Himalaya is enriched by both the Polygonatum<br />

species which are potential future drugs and can be a milestone in the drift from allopathy<br />

to herbal heath care system. P. verticillatum was found vulnerable in Uttarakhand,<br />

Himanchal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir and Arunachal Pradesh while P. cirrhifolium is<br />

endangered in Himanchal Pradesh and vulnerable in Uttarakhand (Fig. 3) [VED & al.<br />

2003]. This status is assigned by IUCN through FRLHT (Foundation for Revitalization of<br />

Local Health Traditions) which utilized the CAMP (Conservation Assessment and<br />

Management Prioritization) process to undertake rapid assessment of prioritized medicinal<br />

plant species of conservation concern in different states/regions of India. Through this<br />

evaluation taxa have been assigned Red List status of “threatened” category i.e. critically<br />

endangered, endangered and vulnerable. The reason behind there threatened status is their<br />

exploitation for their medicinal value. In addition habitat specificity, narrow range of<br />

distribution, land-use disturbances, introduction of non-natives, habitat alteration, climatic<br />

changes, heavy livestock grazing, explosion of human density, fragmentation and<br />

degradation of plant density, population bottleneck and genetic drift [KALA & al. 2006;<br />

KALA, 2007] are the potential causes of rarity in medicinal plant species. The women of<br />

these areas carry all the activities of domestication of cattle. They collect the food and<br />

fodder from the nearby forests and due to lack of identification cut the Polygonatum species<br />

along with the fodder grasses. This is therefore one of the reasons of threatened status of<br />

these plant species.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The present study concludes that the distribution and ethnobotanical uses<br />

documented were correct but the knowledge was limited to only local healers and<br />

inhabitants were unknown towards the identification of plant species studied. This is<br />

although beneficial for protecting the plant from overexploitation and thereby illegal trade<br />

but this unfamiliarity is also posing threat for the existence of these species. Therefore<br />

immediate steps were needed for educating local residents about the plants in vigilance of<br />

Government so that plants can be protected from both overexploitation and negligence.<br />

The study also emphasize that these two plant are suffering from negligence of<br />

people both common man and researchers and to revitalize these two magnificent species.<br />

Conservation initiatives are urgently required. The study also suggests that despite the so<br />

much work done there is still a dearth of research to prove the potential of the natural<br />

Himalayan habitats in terms of medicinal plant production.<br />

164


BISHT POONAM, PRASAD PRATTI, NAUTIYAL BHAGWATI PRASAD<br />

A: Distribution of Polygonatum verticillatum and P. cirrhifolium in India; B: Distribution of<br />

P. verticillatum in India; C: Districts of Uttarakhand where present study was undertaken; D: Hill<br />

areas of Uttarakhand; E: Plain areas of Uttarakhand.<br />

Fig. 3. Map of Uttarakhand showing the study areas in Garhwal Himalaya.<br />

Appendix<br />

Name of the participant<br />

Age of the participant<br />

What is the local name of the plant used?<br />

For which diseases do you use the plant?<br />

Which parts of the plant do you use?<br />

How do you prepare the plant for use?<br />

165<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

E


POLYGONATUM VERTICILLATUM (LINN.) ALL. AND POLYGONATUM CIRRHIFOLIUM (WALL.) …<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

Authors are grateful to Prof. A. R. Nautiyal, Director, High Altitude Plant<br />

Physiology Research Centre, Uttarakhand, India for providing necessary facilities and<br />

encouragement. The corresponding author also likes to thanks Drs. Gunjan Sharma and<br />

Neelam Rawat for their assistance during the survey.<br />

References<br />

1. ALLIONI C. 1785. Flora Pedemontana. Giovanni Michele Briolo, Turin.<br />

2. ANONYMOUS. 1969. The wealth of India: A dictionary of Indian raw material and industrial products, 8,<br />

Publication and Information Directorate CSIR, New Delhi, 192-193 pp.<br />

3. ANONYMOUS. 2002 (unpublished). Action plan for conservation, cultivation and sustainable utilisation of<br />

medicinal and aromatic plants in Uttaranchal, Herbal Research and Development Institute, Gopeshwar<br />

(Chamoli) and Uttaranchal State Forest Department, Dehradun.<br />

4. ANONYMOUS. 2003. Medicinal plants in India, Institute of economic and market research printways New<br />

Delhi.<br />

5. ANONYMOUS. 2009. Groundwater brochure of Rudraprayag District, Uttarakhand.<br />

6. ANONYMOUS. 2011. National Informatics Centre (NIC), Uttarakhand.<br />

7. BENTHAM G. & HOOKER J. D. 1862-1883. Genera Plantarum, 1-3, L. Reeve and Co., London.<br />

8. GAIROLA Y. & BISWAS S. 2008. Bioprospecting in Garhwal Himalayas, Uttarakhand. Current Science,<br />

94(9): 1139-1143.<br />

9. GAUR R. D. 1999. Flora of district Garhwal, North West Himalaya (with ethnobotanical notes).<br />

Transmedia, Srinagar Garhwal.<br />

10. GODAGAMA S. & HODGKINSON L. 1997. The handbook of Ayurveda- India's medical wisdom<br />

explained. Kyle Cathie Limited, London.<br />

11. HEYWOOD V. H. 2000. Global biodiversity assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.<br />

12. HUSSAIN S. & HORE D. K. 2008. Collection and conservation of major medicinal plants of Arunanchal<br />

Pradesh. Indian Forester, 12: 1663-1679.<br />

13. HUTCHINSON J. 1973. The Families of Flowering Plants. Oxford University Press, Oxford.<br />

14. KALA C. P. 2007. Local preferences of ethnobotany in the Indian Himalaya: implications for environmental<br />

conservation. Current Science, 93(12): 1828–1834.<br />

15. KALA C. P., DHYANI P. P. & SAJWAN B. S. 2006. Developing the medicinal plant sector in northern<br />

India: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Ethnobiology & Ethnomedicine, 2: 32.<br />

16. KANDARI O. P. & GUSAIN O. P. 2001. Garhwal Himalaya: Nature, Culture and Society. Transmedia,<br />

Media House, Srinagar Garhwal, Uttarakhand, India.<br />

17. KUMAR V. 1959b. Karyotype in two Himalayan species of Polygonatum. Experientia, 15: 419-420.<br />

18. KUMAR V. 1959c. Proceedings of the 46 th Indian Science Congress, part 3: 19-20.<br />

19. KUMAR V. 1960. Proceedings of the 47 th Indian Science Congress, part 3: 370 pp.<br />

20. KUMAR V. 1964–1965. Proceedings of the 51 st and 52 nd Indian Science Congress, Part 3: 357 pp.<br />

21. LATTOO S. K., DHAR A. K. & JASROTIA A. 2001. Epicotyl seed dormancy and phenology of<br />

germination in Polygonatum cirrhifolium Royle. Current Science, 81(11): 1414-1417.<br />

22. LATTOO S. K., KHAN S. & DHAR A. K. 2005. A new chromosome number in Polygonatum cirrhifolium<br />

Royle: an endangered liliaceous medicinal herb. Current Science, 89(7): 1080-1081.<br />

23. LINNAEUS C. 1753. Species plantarum. Holmiae.<br />

24. MILLER P. 1754. The Gardeners Dictionary, ed. 1. 1731. See Druce, G. Claridge. The abridgement of<br />

Miller's Gardener's Dictionary of 1754. Bot. Exch. Club & Soc. Brit. Isles Rept. 3: 426-436.<br />

25. NAITHANI B. D. 1984. Flora of Chamoli. Vol. 2, <strong>Botanica</strong>l survey of India, Howrah, 654 pp.<br />

26. NAND N. & KUMAR K. 1989. The holy Himalaya: A geographical interpretation of Garhwal. Daya<br />

Publishing House, Delhi.<br />

27. NAUTIYAL B. P., PANDEY N. & BHATT A. B. 1998. Floristics and vegetational composition in an alpine<br />

zone of North West Himalays. In: SHARMA, B. D. & T. KUMARI (eds.) Himalayan natural<br />

resources: ecothreats and restoration study. Indus publishing company, New Delhi: 28-83.<br />

28. NAUTIYAL M. C. & NAUTIYAL B. P. 2004. Agrotechniques for high altitude medicinl and aromatic<br />

plants. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun: 149-155.<br />

166


BISHT POONAM, PRASAD PRATTI, NAUTIYAL BHAGWATI PRASAD<br />

29. OHARA M. M., TAMURA T., HIROSE K. H. & KAWANO S. 2007. Life-history monographs of Japanese<br />

plants. 8: Polygonatum odoratum (Miller) Druce var. pluriflorum (Miq.) Ohwi (Convallariaceae).<br />

Plant Species Biology, 22: 59-64.<br />

30. SAEED M. H., KHAN M. A., KHAN S. U., SIMJEE N. M. & KHAN S. A. 2010. Phytotoxic, insecticidal<br />

and leishmanicidal activities of aerial parts of Polygonatum verticillatum. African Journal of<br />

Biotechnology, 9: 1241-1244.<br />

31. SAMANT S. S. 1998. Diversity, distribution and conservation of fodder resource of west Himalaya, India.<br />

In: MISRI B. (eds.). Proceedings of the third temperate pasture and fodder network (TAPAFON).<br />

Pokhra, Nepal, sponsored by F.A.O., Rome.<br />

32. SHAH N. C. & JAIN S. K. 1988. Ethano-medicoco-botany botany of Kumaun Himalaya, India Social<br />

Pharmaocolgy, 2(4): 359-380.<br />

33. SINGH A. P. 2006. Ashtavarga - rare medicinal plants. Ethnobotanical Leaflets, 10: 104-108.<br />

34. SOOD S. K., RANA S. & LAKHANPAL T. N. 2005. Ethnic aphrodisiac plants, Scientific publishers India,<br />

Jodhpur, 95 pp.<br />

35. SZYBKA-HRYNKIEWICZ P. & JANECZKO Z. 2004. Densytometric analysis of diosgenin in extracts<br />

from callus tissue of Polygonatum verticillatum (L.) All. Biotechnologia, 2: 93-99.<br />

36. THERMAN E. 1953. Chromosomal evolution in the genus Polygonatum. Hereditas, 39(1-2): 277-288.<br />

37. VARIER P. S. 1995. Indian Medicinal Plants. Vol. 4. Orient Longman Hyderabad: 333-338.<br />

38. VASHISTHA R. K. 2006. Ecophysiology and agro-technology of two important Himalayan herbs: Angelica<br />

glauca Edgew. and Angelica archangelica Linn. D. Phil. Thesis submitted to H.N.B. Garhwal<br />

University, Srinagar (Garhwal), Uttarakhand, India.<br />

39. VED D. K., KINHAL G. A., RAVIKUMAR K., PRABHAKARAN V., GHATE U., SANKAR R. V. &<br />

INDRESHA J. H. 2003. CAMP report: Conservation assessment and management prioritisation for the<br />

medicinal plants of Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh and Uttaranchal. FRLHT, Bangalore.<br />

167


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 169-177<br />

169<br />

POP (BOANCĂ) PĂUNIŢA IULIANA & al.<br />

ECOLOGICAL AND AESTHETIC ROLE OF SPONTANEOUS<br />

FLORA IN URBAN SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPES<br />

DEVELOPMENT<br />

POP (BOANCĂ) PĂUNIŢA IULIANA 1 , DUMITRAŞ ADELINA 1 ,<br />

SINGUREANU VALENTIN 1 , CLAPA DOINA 2 , MAZĂRE GEORGEL 1<br />

Abstract: The aim of this scientific paper is to promote sustainable methods with beneficial effects on the<br />

environment, with aesthetic effect on urban and rural landscapes. This paper highlights and<br />

promotes ecological and aesthetic role of spontaneous flora in sustainable landscape planning. This<br />

method in which spontaneous flora is an important environmental factor is minimal valued in terms<br />

of landscape, even less implemented in Romania. By covering current bibliographic references, by<br />

analysing contemporary urban landscape in Cluj-Napoca, Romania, in the present study, are exposed<br />

principles, benefits, constraints and legitimate questions about sustainable landscapes by introducing<br />

spontaneous flora or, more simply, through its conservation, practical examples of successful<br />

integration in the contemporary landscape of ruderal landscapes. Conclusions from this study refer<br />

specifically to the role of spontaneous landscapes in urban ecology, to the management of these<br />

landscapes and exposure of minimum guidelines so that this method has a decent start in Romania.<br />

Key words: spontaneous flora, ruderal, landscaping, ecology, conservation<br />

Introduction<br />

Given the negative changes that occur in the natural environment due, in<br />

particular, to noxious anthropogenic factors, the main purpose of this paper is to highlight<br />

the ecological and aesthetic values of spontaneous vegetation and use/conservation of this<br />

type of vegetation in sustainable landscape.<br />

In this paper is treated particularly the spontaneous flora from urban and ruderal<br />

landscapes that can be successfully valued to greening cities. In most urban areas, a<br />

cosmopolitan range of wild plants provide important ecological services, services which, in<br />

light of the expected impact of climate change could become increasingly important in the<br />

future. Peter Del Tredici asserts that the management of spontaneous vegetation in urban<br />

areas to increase its ecological and social values is a sustainable strategy rather than an<br />

attempt to restore historical ecosystems existing before the establishment of current cities<br />

[DEL TREDICI, 2010].<br />

European ecologists have been analysing the historical development and spatial<br />

distribution of spontaneous urban vegetation over several decades [CHOCHOLOUŠKOVA<br />

& PYŠEK, 2003; PYŠEK & al. 2004; SUKOPP, 2002] and recently began documenting the<br />

coverage in urban ecosystems using GIS technology [HERBST & HERBST, 2006; RINK,<br />

2009]. Peter Del Tredici make a comparison between European and North American<br />

ecologists showing that the last ones have been slow to adopt urban ecology and began to<br />

1<br />

University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca – România, e-mail:<br />

paunita_boanca@yahoo.com<br />

2<br />

Fruit Research Station Cluj, Cluj-Napoca – România


ECOLOGICAL AND AESTHETIC ROLE OF SPONTANEOUS FLORA IN URBAN SUSTAINABLE…<br />

focus seriously on the subject since the 1990's [ALBERTI & al. 2003; GRIMM & al. 2000;<br />

ZIPPERER & al. 1997; DEL TREDICI, 2010].<br />

Applying the comparison, we see that in Romania the interest in the spontaneous<br />

landscape environmental values is recent and is not yet well defined.<br />

This paper supports the idea that spontaneous urban vegetation can effectively<br />

achieve many of the environmental objectives of traditional restoring with minimum<br />

financial investment and a greater chance of long-term success [CHOI, 2004; SAGOFF,<br />

2005]. The information presented urges ecologists, landscape architects, and other<br />

professionals interested, taking into account, without prejudice, all biological resources and<br />

to recognize that cities spontaneous flora has the ability to make significant contributions to<br />

urban ecological functionality.<br />

Material and methods<br />

The paper is based on the study of scientific literature existing in Romania and<br />

internationally, and analysis and identification of Cluj-Napoca spontaneous landscape for<br />

application of sustainable methods in landscape planning.<br />

Using these research methods, the paper highlights the characteristics of the urban<br />

environment, urban spontaneous vegetation, its management, and examples of successful<br />

integration of ruderal urban landscape in Germany and the United States of America, and<br />

presents elements that differentiate new designed landscapes that used spontaneous flora<br />

from spontaneous landscapes preserved and managed for aesthetics and urban greening.<br />

Results and discussions<br />

From a strictly functional perspective, most vegetated urban lands can be<br />

classified into one of the three broad categories: remnant native landscapes, managed<br />

horticultural landscapes, and abandoned ruderal landscapes [KOWARIK, 2005; KÜHN,<br />

2006; WHITNEY, 1985; ZIPPERER & al. 1997]. These landscape types can be<br />

distinguished analysing: 1) their past land-use history; 2) the types of vegetation they<br />

contain; 3) the characteristics of their soils; 4) the levels of maintenance they require in<br />

order to preserve their integrity. All three types of landscapes are found in urban areas of<br />

Cluj-Napoca (Fig. 1).<br />

The least studied of these types is the abandoned ruderal landscape represented by<br />

marginal or degraded urban land that receives little or no maintenance, dominated by<br />

spontaneous vegetation - a mix of species that grow and reproduce without human care or intent.<br />

In Cluj-Napoca this type of landscape, ruderal, is common and we can clearly<br />

associate with the margins of transportation infrastructure, abandoned or vacant residential,<br />

commercial, and industrial property, and the interstitial spaces that separate one land-use<br />

function from another (Fig. 2, 3). While ruderal landscapes are often referred to as<br />

“wastelands” the progress of urban ecology place in a new light this neglected resource.<br />

Perhaps the most obvious aspect of the distinctive urban environments is the ubiquitous<br />

physical disturbance associated with the construction and/or maintenance of their<br />

infrastructure.<br />

Being a city with relatively well developed economy, in Cluj-Napoca, a significant<br />

part of the factories are always in a process of dismantling and reconstruction, which tends<br />

to generate a constantly shifting mosaic composed of opportunistic plant associations<br />

dominated by disturbance-tolerant, early successional species. An edifying example of<br />

170


171<br />

POP (BOANCĂ) PĂUNIŢA IULIANA & al.<br />

tolerance and adaptability to extreme conditions offered by the urban areas is the way that a<br />

fern manages to survive on the wall of a building in Cluj-Napoca (Fig. 4, 5). The images<br />

were captured in 2009 and 2011, demonstrating the resilience and adaptation of this species<br />

in adverse conditions. After analysing the urban landscape of Cluj-Napoca we find that in<br />

neighbourhoods with the highest property value - spontaneous vegetation is found in<br />

relatively small quantities, while in the poorer neighbourhoods and industrial areas this type<br />

of vegetation abounds (Fig. 6). The origin and global dispersal of the spontaneous<br />

vegetation that dominates abandoned urban land is both a cultural and a biological<br />

phenomenon [KOWARIK, 2003; KOWARIK & LANGER, 2005; MACK & ERNEBERG,<br />

2002]. This vegetation is represented by a cosmopolitan range of species, as follows: 1)<br />

native to the area; 2) formerly or currently cultivated for agricultural or horticultural<br />

purposes; 3) unintentionally introduced, disturbance adapted weeds.<br />

An exhaustive literature review of the vegetation of 54 cities in Central Europe<br />

indicates a “remarkable concentration of aliens in urban areas” [PYŠEK, 1998]. In recent<br />

years, a number of European researchers have gone so far as to propose that certain innercity<br />

areas with relatively old patches of spontaneous vegetation be actively conserved<br />

because of the role they play in generating and maintaining urban biodiversity<br />

[KOWARIK, 2005; MURATET & al. 2007; RINK, 2009].<br />

PETER DEL TREDICI (2010) shows that the spontaneous vegetation of North<br />

American cities has not been studied as extensively as that of European cities. CLEMANTS<br />

& MOORE (2003) found that the non-native species richness of urban areas in the U.S. is<br />

probably more influenced by historical and socio-economic factors than by climate or<br />

latitude. Part of the spontaneous flora that dominates American urban landscapes is due to<br />

successive waves of immigrants, which along with their traditional cultures have introduced<br />

associated weeds [MACK, 2000; MACK, 2003; MACK & ERNBERG, 2002]. Also, Del<br />

Tredici notes that in contrast to the large number of European plants introduced in North<br />

America, few species native to this region were able to penetrate and be naturalized in<br />

Europe [WITTIG, 2004; DEL TREDICI, 2010]. The asymmetry of the biological exchange<br />

between the two continents is partly a reflection of the lopsided nature of the cultural<br />

exchange between the two continents and partly a result of the fact that Europe, for reasons<br />

relating to both cultural and evolutionary history, seems to be unusually rich in disturbanceadapted<br />

herbaceous species [WEBER, 1997].<br />

The idea that self-sustaining, historically accurate plant associations can be<br />

restored to urban areas is an idea with little credibility in light of the facts that 1) the density<br />

of the human population and the infrastructure necessary to support it have led to the<br />

removal of the original vegetation; 2) the abiotic growing conditions of urban areas are<br />

completely different from what they were originally; and 3) the large numbers of nonnative<br />

species that have naturalized in cities provide intense competition for the native<br />

species that grew there prior to urbanization. [DEL TREDICI, 2010]. Ecosystem services<br />

provided by the urban spontaneous vegetation include: temperature reduction; food and/or<br />

habitat for wildlife; erosion control on slopes and disturbed ground; stream and river bank<br />

stabilization; excess nutrient absorption in wetlands (mainly nitrogen and phosphorus); soil<br />

building on degraded land; improved air and water quality; sound reduction;<br />

phytoremediation of contaminated soil [POREÇBSKA & OSTROWSKA, 1999]; and<br />

carbon sequestration. At the functional level, spontaneous urban vegetation can be<br />

considered sustainable in the sense that it is performing a wide range of quantifiable<br />

ecosystem services on marginal land with a minimal input of maintenance resources [DEL<br />

TREDICI, 2010; RINK, 2009].


ECOLOGICAL AND AESTHETIC ROLE OF SPONTANEOUS FLORA IN URBAN SUSTAINABLE…<br />

While it is relatively easy to enumerate the ecological value of spontaneous<br />

vegetation, it is considerably more difficult to quantify its social and aesthetic value<br />

[KÖRNER, 2005]. Many of the people who live in cities tend to interpret the presence of<br />

spontaneous urban vegetation in their neighbourhood as a visible manifestation of<br />

dereliction and neglect, even though they may view the same plants growing in a suburban<br />

or rural context as “wildflowers” (Fig. 7). Unfortunately, the social and aesthetic values of<br />

spontaneous, ecologically functional urban landscapes often leave something to be desired.<br />

This raises the question of whether or not there is a way to harmonize the ecological<br />

functionality of spontaneous urban vegetation with people's desire to live in a safe and<br />

beautiful environment.<br />

Perhaps the most famous example of the successful integration of spontaneous<br />

vegetation into a designed landscape is Peter Latz's Landschaftspark in Duisburg-Nord, in<br />

the Ruhr area of Germany, which transformed the contaminated ruins of an abandoned steel<br />

mill into a dynamic, heavily visited cultural center (Fig. 8). Another worthy of being<br />

followed example, is the High Line Park in New York (Fig. 9). It is noted in recent years,<br />

an encouraging evolution, but not sufficient, of these types of sustainable landscapes, in<br />

which the spontaneous flora is an important factor, being preserved and ruderal and postindustrial<br />

urban landscapes are rehabilitated with minimum interventions in behalf of an<br />

ecological environment.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Environmental education in Romania, both of specialists and the general public,<br />

improves visible and continuously. Given the conditions - economic, political, social - from<br />

Romania we expect that concrete actions are needed for the increased interest on this issue<br />

will not remain at the “trend” scenario, projects, experiences and forecasts level but also to<br />

be applied in order to obtain tangible and extensive results of this type of sustainable<br />

landscape.<br />

We recommend therefore that all those involved to overcome the divisive<br />

arguments on the relative value of native species versus exotic species, and to focus on the<br />

ecological functionality of spontaneous urban vegetation.<br />

The task we face is not how to eliminate these plants, but rather how to manage<br />

them to increase their ecological, social, and aesthetic values. In the short term, after the<br />

scientific literature review and spontaneous landscape of Cluj-Napoca brief analysis,<br />

emerges a clear but not optimistic conclusion: due to simultaneous or separate action of<br />

several factors (economic, perceptual, political, social environmental, climatic, etc.)<br />

spontaneous vegetation is unlikely to play a significant role in future development of urban<br />

ecosystems in our country.<br />

References<br />

1. ALBERTI M., MARZLUFF J. M., SCHULENBERGER E., BRADLEY G., RYAN C. & ZUMBRUNNEN C.<br />

2003. Integrating humans into ecology: Opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems.<br />

Bioscience, 53(12): 1169-1179.<br />

2. CHOCHOLOUŠKOVA Z. & PYŠEK P. 2003. Changes in composition and structure of urban flora over 120<br />

years: a case study of the city of Plzeň. Flora, 198(5): 366-376.<br />

3. CHOI YOUNG D. 2004. Theories for ecological restoration in changing environment: toward ‘Futuristic’<br />

restoration. Ecological Research, 19(1): 75-81.<br />

172


173<br />

POP (BOANCĂ) PĂUNIŢA IULIANA & al.<br />

4. CLEMANTS S. E. & MOORE G. 2003. Patterns of species richness in eight northeastern United States cities.<br />

Urban Habitats, 1(1): 4-16 (on-line journal http://www.urbanhabitats.org/v01n01/speciesdiversity_pdf.pdf).<br />

5. GRIMM NANCY B., MORGAN J. G., PICKETT STEWARD T. A. & REDMAN C. L. 2000. Integrated<br />

approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. BioScience, 50(7): 571-584.<br />

6. HERBST H. & HERBST V. 2006. The development of an evaluation method using a geographic information<br />

system to determine the importance of Wasteland Sites as Urban Wildlife Areas. Landscape and Urban<br />

Planning, 77(1-2): 178-195.<br />

7. KÖRNER S. 2005. Nature conservation, forestry, landscape architecture and historic preservation: perspectives<br />

for a conceptual alliance, pp. 193-220. In: Kowarik I & Körner S. (eds.). Wild Urban Woodlands. Berlin:<br />

Springer.<br />

8. KOWARIK I. 2003. Human agency in biological invasions: secondary releases foster naturalization and<br />

population expansion of alien plant species. Biological Invasions, 5(4): 293-312.<br />

9. KOWARIK I. 2005. Wild urban woodlands: toward a conceptual framework. Pp. 1–32. In: Ingo Kowarik and<br />

Stefan Körner (eds.). Wild Urban Woodlands, Berlin: Springer.<br />

10. KÜHN N. 2006. Intentions for the unintentional spontaneous vegetation as the basis for innovative planting<br />

design in urban areas. Journ. Landscape Archit, 46-53.<br />

11. MACK R. N. 2000. Cultivation fosters plant naturalization by reducing environmental stochasticity. Biological<br />

Invasions, 2: 111-122.<br />

12. MACK R. N. & ERNEBERG M. 2002. The United States naturalized flora: largely the product of deliberate<br />

introductions. Annals Missouri Bot. Gard., 89: 176-189.<br />

13. MACK R. N. 2003. Plant naturalizations and invasions in the eastern United States: 1634-1860. Annals<br />

Missouri Bot. Gard., 90: 77-90.<br />

14. MURATET A., MACHON N., JIGUET F., MORET J. & PORCHER E. 2007. The role of urban structures in<br />

the distribution of wasteland flora in the greater Paris area, France. Ecosystems, 10(4): 661-671.<br />

15. PETER DEL TREDICI. 2010. Spontaneous Urban Vegetation. Reflections of Change in a Globalized World.<br />

Nature and Culture, 5(3): 299-315.<br />

16. POREÇBSKA G. & OSTROWSKA A. 1999. Heavy metal accumulation in wild plants: implications for<br />

phytoremediation. Polish J. Environ. Stud., 8(6): 433-442.<br />

17. PYŠEK P. 1998. Alien and native species in Central European urban floras: a quantitative comparison. Journal<br />

of Biogeography, 25: 155-163.<br />

18. PYŠEK P., CHOCHOLOUŠKOVÁ Z., PYŠEK A., JAROŠÍK V., CHYTRÝ M. & TICHY L. 2004. Trends in<br />

species diversity and composition of urban vegetation over three decades. Journal of Vegetation Science,<br />

15(6): 781-788.<br />

29. RINK D. 2009. Wilderness: The nature of urban shrinkage? The debate on urban restructuring and restoration<br />

in Eastern Germany. Nature and Culture, 4(3): 275-292.<br />

20. SAGOFF M. 2005. Do non-native species threaten the natural environment?, Journal of Agricultural and<br />

Environmental Ethics, 18: 215-236.<br />

21. SUKOPP H. 2002. On the early history of urban ecology in Europe. Preslia, The Journal of the Czech<br />

<strong>Botanica</strong>l Society, 74: 373-39.<br />

22. WEBER E. F. 1997. The alien flora of Europe: a taxonomic and biogeographic review. J. Veg. Sci., 8(4): 565-<br />

572.<br />

23. WHITNEY, GORDON G. 1985. A quantitative analysis of the flora and plant communities of a representative<br />

Midwestern U.S. Town. Urban Ecology, 6: 143-160.<br />

24. WITTIG R. 2004. The origin and development of the urban flora of Central Europe. Urban Ecosystems, 7:<br />

323-339.<br />

25. ZIPPERER WAYNE C., SIGINNI SUSAN M. & POUYAT R. V. 1997. Urban tree cover: an ecological<br />

perspective. Urban Ecosystems, 1: 229-246.<br />

26. *** http://www.landschaftspark.de/architektur-natur, last accessed 22.10.2011.<br />

27. *** http://flolo.blogspot.com/2010/09/life-on-high-line.html, last accessed 22.10.2011.


ECOLOGICAL AND AESTHETIC ROLE OF SPONTANEOUS FLORA IN URBAN SUSTAINABLE…<br />

a b<br />

c<br />

Fig. 1. Remnant native landscape (a), abandoned ruderal landscape (b) and managed horticultural<br />

landscape (c) – also identified in Cluj-Napoca<br />

Fig. 2. Ruderale landscape – margins of transportation infrastructure – Cluj-Napoca<br />

174


175<br />

POP (BOANCĂ) PĂUNIŢA IULIANA & al.<br />

a b<br />

Fig. 3. Ruderale landscape – abandoned industrial property (a), interstitial spaces (b) Cluj-Napoca<br />

Fig. 4. Fern development on the<br />

Cluj-Napoca building wall, May, 2009<br />

a<br />

Fig. 5. Fern development on the<br />

Cluj-Napoca building wall, August, 2011<br />

Fig. 6. Cluj-Napoca – spontaneous vegetation in zone with different values: (a) industrial areas<br />

and (b) in the poorer neighbourhoods, Cluj-Napoca<br />

b


ECOLOGICAL AND AESTHETIC ROLE OF SPONTANEOUS FLORA IN URBAN SUSTAINABLE…<br />

b<br />

Fig. 7. Spontaneous vegetation in rural landscape and in urban landscape – different perceptions -<br />

(a) positive perception in rural landscape; (b) negative perception in urban landscape<br />

176<br />

a


Fig. 8. Landschaftspark-Duisburg<br />

Source: http://www.landschaftspark.de/architektur-natur<br />

177<br />

POP (BOANCĂ) PĂUNIŢA IULIANA & al.<br />

Fig. 9. High Line Park – New York<br />

Source: http://flolo.blogspot.com/2010/09/life-on-high-line.html


J. Plant Develop.<br />

18(2011): 179-189<br />

AABID RASOOL ZARGAR, MEHRAJ A. SHEIKH, MUNESH KUMAR<br />

GLOBAL WARMING: IMPLICATIONS AND ANTICIPATORY<br />

ADAPTIVE MEASURES<br />

AABID RASOOL ZARGAR 1 , MEHRAJ A. SHEIKH 1 , MUNESH KUMAR 2<br />

Abstract: Our earth is warming up. There is no denying to this fact that the gradual heating up of our globe has<br />

a tremendous effect on the climate. It in turn has affected the biotic factors that make up our<br />

biosphere, eventually directing the course of our socio-economic development. Some workers are,<br />

however, optimistic about this natural phenomenon. Various ways have been suggested to mitigate<br />

the effects of global warming, but the damage already done cannot be revoked. Hence, the thing that<br />

we are left with is to go for anticipatory adaptive measures so as to tone down the intensity of future<br />

implications of global warming.<br />

Key words: global warming, anticipatory adaptive measures, climate change, biophysical impacts<br />

Introduction<br />

There is a sudden uproar all-round the world about the increasing global<br />

temperature. Atmospheric CO2 is accelerating upward from decade to decade. In the past<br />

decade, the average annual rate of increase was 1.91 parts per million (ppm). This rate of<br />

increase is more than double what it was during the first decade of CO2 instrument<br />

measurements at the Mauna Loa Observatory. The concentration of CO2 had gone from 350<br />

ppm in 1950 to 385 ppm in 2009 [ESRL, 2009]. Statistically, the scientists all round the<br />

globe agree on appoint that our earth is definitely warming up. The change on earth is<br />

defined as “a change in the climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human<br />

activities that alter the composition of the global atmosphere and which are in addition to<br />

natural climate variability observed over comparable time period” [UNFCCC, 1997]. In this<br />

definition human has been accounted as the sole reason for the changes in the climate,<br />

which is opposable if we take into account the solar activities.<br />

Global warming cannot be simply and wholly attributed to the increase in the<br />

green house gases (GHGs) due to human-activities. Solar activities and related aspects have<br />

to be given due consideration, at the same time. Since the solar activities are by the far,<br />

under-estimated and the activities of the human are more evident, we seem to direct all our<br />

attention and resources towards the “anthropogenic causes” of global warming. In this<br />

paper we have tried to sum up the impacts of the global warming and tried to take a holistic<br />

approach and discussed. The factors contributing largely to global warming have been dealt<br />

with in details to give a fair picture of the global scenario.<br />

1 Biodiversity and Climate Change Division, Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, Dehradun - India<br />

2 Department of Forestry, HNB Garhwal University, Srinagar, Garhwal, 249161, Uttarakhand – India<br />

e-mail: munesh.hnbgu@gmail.com, tel/fax: +911370267529<br />

179


GLOBAL WARMING: IMPLICATIONS AND ANTICIPATORY ADAPTIVE MEASURES<br />

Material and methods<br />

This paper is a compilation of a large number of works done on global warming<br />

both by Indian as well as foreign researchers. The paper has been prepared with a simple,<br />

yet necessary perspective of summing up the effects of climate change due to global<br />

warming on vegetation and other living organisms and the ultimate effect on the socioeconomic<br />

aspect. In due course, it is our belief that certain misconception and underestimation<br />

of certain facts can be overcome. All the factors that appear to be contributing to<br />

global warming have been discussed with examples from different parts of the world to<br />

give a crystal clear picture.<br />

Results and discussion<br />

1. Biophysical Impacts (Tab. 1)<br />

1.1. Climatic and Geological aspects<br />

Temperature has evidently increased all throughout the globe. There has been an<br />

increase in global temperature over the years [IPCC, 2007] report. With the increase in<br />

global temperature, the temperature of the sea water has risen, decreasing the solubility<br />

of carbon-dioxide on its surface which ultimately increases partial pressure of CO2.<br />

Consequently, uptake of CO2 by ocean water has reduced, thereby increasing greenhouse<br />

effect. RAWAT & RAWAT (1998) and NEGI & al. (2003) observed that monsoon rains<br />

have declined over the past seven decades, whereas, the local rains have substantially<br />

increased, while studying rainfall pattern in Doon valley. Also, precipitation is likely to<br />

increase in the mid and the high latitudinally placed regions in the northern hemisphere<br />

[LEGGETT, 1990]. With the increase in the evaporation the amount of water-vapour in<br />

the atmosphere is bound to increase which will consequently increase the humidity,<br />

affecting the overall precipitation regime. Clouds account for the cooling effect in the<br />

Earth’s atmosphere. But if more clouds are formed at the higher altitudes (which are<br />

cooler), they will emit less radiation, supplementing to greenhouse effect and thereby<br />

increasing the temperature [RAMANATHAN & al. 1989]. Also it has been suggested by<br />

CHARLSON & al. [1987] that emission of di-methyl sulphide (DMS) by marine<br />

planktons, which serve as condensation nuclei, might act as global thermostat. This will<br />

increase in cloudiness and lead to cooling of the ocean surface. But this might also affect<br />

the activity of the plankton, thereby closing the loop.<br />

According to the IPCC (2001), the pattern of wind is likely to change. The interdecadal<br />

Pacific Oscillation and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation bring about variability in the<br />

climate of Pacific Basin. Likewise, North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) accounts for the<br />

westerly over the Atlantic and the extra-tropical Eurasia, which are likely to become strong.<br />

A similar Antarctic Oscillation affects the westerly in the southern hemisphere which has<br />

shown an increase in the strength over the past 15 years. There would be a shutdown in the<br />

thermohaline and thermocline circulation.<br />

The increase in the percentage of the atmospheric will cause an increased amount<br />

of CO2 to dissolve in to the ocean. This leads to the formation of carbonic acid that lowers<br />

the pH of the ocean [UNEP, 2002]. In India, the Gangotri glacier has been receding at an<br />

average rate of 19m per year over the last 65 years [SHANKER & SRIVASTAVA, 1999].<br />

Hence, melting of ice-caps and receding of glaciers will lead to increase in the level of the<br />

sea and submerge the low-lying coastal regions, consequently.<br />

180


AABID RASOOL ZARGAR, MEHRAJ A. SHEIKH, MUNESH KUMAR<br />

Climatic models have shown that drought is likely to increase from 5% to 50% by<br />

the year 2050 A.D. The hardest hit regions would be north Africa, south Africa, western<br />

Arabia, south east Asia, Mexico, Central America, south west USA, and the Mediterranean<br />

belt [IPCC, 1990]. The frequency and intensity of drought have been observed to increase<br />

in the recent decades. Also, part of the Amazon rain forest will turn into desert by 2050.<br />

Another concern is the possibility of a positive feedback loop, i.e., global warming can<br />

cause further warming in a vicious circle. Melting ice-caps appears to be causing the release<br />

of large amount of CO2 and methane from decaying vegetation trapped beneath. It also<br />

could lead to increased heat absorption as ice reflects more because of its higher albedo<br />

than land and water.<br />

1. 2. Edaphic factors<br />

The decomposition of the soil depends upon the temperature of the soil, the<br />

presence/population of effective soil micro-flora and fauna, the type of litter (lignin: N<br />

ratio, carbon content etc.), availability of soil moisture in adequate amount, species<br />

composition and structure of plant community. It is an established fact that the colder<br />

biomes are much more sensitive and responsive towards global warming than the warmer<br />

ones. As a whole, litter decomposition in colder biomes is likely to increase, along with a<br />

steady influx of CO2 into the atmosphere. The Q10 value, which is taken to be 2 for<br />

biological processes, is found to be 3-4 in the arctic regions [ROBINSON & al. 1983]. The<br />

decomposition rate has been found to be more in the colder and wetter sites of higher<br />

altitudes than the warmer and drier sites of the lower altitudes [MURPHY & al. 1998].<br />

IPCC (1990) states that it is not possible to predict reliably either the geographical<br />

distribution of changes in soil-water or the net effect of these changes on carbon fluxes and<br />

storage in different ecosystems’: with the increase in the temperature, summer monsoon<br />

rainfall has increased over the Indo-Gangetic plains between 1829 and 1999, whereas, it has<br />

been estimated that the Indian sub-continent is to experience a decline of 5-25% in the<br />

winter rainfall [BHARDWAJ & PANWAR, 2003], which would have a profound effect on<br />

the soil moisture status.<br />

Climate change impact on water quality is the result of precipitation above the<br />

infiltration capacity of the soil or the exceedance of the water holding capacity of the soil<br />

volume causing drainage of water through soil-profile. Increase in precipitation amount or<br />

frequency of storm even with decreased total amounts in each storm can have serious<br />

implications for surface run-off, drainage and water quality [HATFIELD & PRUEGER,<br />

2004]. Nitrogen and Phosphorus cannot be applied in the soil when the probability of<br />

rainfall immediately after application is high [EGHBALL & al. 2002].<br />

1.3. Biological factors<br />

Species diversity will decline. Forests will be rapidly destroyed without their<br />

restoration or replacement. Species will be lost as climate and habitat migrate out from<br />

under them. Also the specific ecotypes- specific combination of genes accumulated for each<br />

locale by selection through many generations – will also be lost. Forests will be substituted<br />

by savannahs, shrub lands and grasslands.<br />

If we study the adaptation pattern in the world of fauna and flora we get to see<br />

the following:<br />

181


GLOBAL WARMING: IMPLICATIONS AND ANTICIPATORY ADAPTIVE MEASURES<br />

Swamp Adaptations in plants<br />

Stilt roots for support in swampy areas, breathing roots or pneumatophores in<br />

mangrove species (either seasonal or permanent) might be seen to fulfill the oxygen<br />

requirement of roots [CHANDRASHEKARA & SREEJITH, 2003]. This is in particular to<br />

the areas where the water table has increased and hence plants and trees exhibit such type<br />

of swamp adaptations.<br />

Phenological Adaptations<br />

Climate change has led to an advance in phenology in many species. Synchrony in<br />

phenology between different species within a food chain may be disrupted if an increase in<br />

temperature affects the phenology of the different species differently, as is the case in the<br />

winter moth egg hatch–oak bud burst system. Operophtera brumata L. (winter moth) egg<br />

hatch date has advanced more than Quercus robur L. (pedunculate oak) bud burst date over<br />

the past two decades. Disrupted synchrony will lead to selection, and a response in<br />

phenology to this selection may lead to species genetically adapting to their changing<br />

environment [MARGRIET & al. 2007]. BROWN (2003) reported the early flowering of<br />

meadow foxtail and coxfoot 7-10 days earlier in 2002 than in 2001.<br />

Seed dispersal<br />

Different palaeo-ecological records predict that a 2.5 °C warming equates to an<br />

altitudinal displacement of more than 400 m and a latitudinal displacement in northern<br />

Europe by more than 300 Km [HUNTLEY, 1991] which allows them to adapt to the long<br />

distance seed-dispersal mechanism.<br />

Other adaptations<br />

According to GRIME (1979), we should expect the competitive species that<br />

dominate many ecosystems to be replaced by more ruderal species which might show<br />

various adaptations, like shortening of life-span, greater commitment of resources to<br />

propagule production and exploiting disturbed situations. The reproductive phenology of<br />

the plants is likely to change like inbreeding depression, ovule abortion, non-viable pollen<br />

production, etc. [KHANDURI & al. 2003] Also the dates of cultivation are likely to change<br />

by + one month in the warmer world. It is observed that if moisture is available, an increase<br />

in the temperature commonly increases rate of respiration by 10-35% or more per 1°C rise<br />

in temperature. In the warmer world, both the temperature and the moisture is higher which<br />

would increase the respiration rates of the living organisms, consequently reducing both net<br />

primary production and net ecosystem production [WOODWELL & WHITTAKER, 1968].<br />

There are two schools of thought regarding the effect of global warming on the<br />

rate of photosynthesis. One says that increased level of CO2 in the atmosphere with<br />

higher precipitation and temperature will increase photosynthetic rates in plants upto a<br />

certain limit. This will increase the net productivity or yield. For example, KELLOMAKI<br />

& al. (1997) reported that a combination of temperature increase of 0.4 °C per decade,<br />

10% increase in annual sum of precipitation and 33 µ mol per decade increase in<br />

atmospheric CO2 will increase timber yield by 30% in one rotation. Another group of<br />

scientists say that the warming in continental centers will increase the arid zones globally<br />

at the expense of currently forested areas which will lower the net production<br />

[WOODWELL & WHITTAKER, 1968].<br />

The polar bear (Ursus maritimus), also known as the Great White Bear, Ice Bear,<br />

and Nanook, is the largest of the world’s bear species. Polar bears live only in the Arctic<br />

and are completely dependent upon the sea ice for survival. Scientists have already<br />

recorded thinner bears, lower female reproductive rates, and reduced juvenile survival in<br />

182


AABID RASOOL ZARGAR, MEHRAJ A. SHEIKH, MUNESH KUMAR<br />

the Western Hudson Bay, polar bear population in Canada, which is at the southern edge of<br />

the species’ range and the first to suffer impacts from global warming. This mighty hunter<br />

now faces likely extinction by the end of this century because its sea ice habitat is literally<br />

melting away due to global warming [Centre for Biological Diversity, 2005]. Atalopedes<br />

campestris (skipper butterfly), a cold-intolerant species, has expanded its territory and now<br />

has a range edge between Yakima and Ellensburg as the winters have become warmer in<br />

the northern California [CROZIER, 2004].<br />

Climate<br />

and<br />

Geological<br />

Edaphic<br />

factors<br />

Biological<br />

factors<br />

Tab. 1. Impacts of global warming on the biophysical aspects<br />

PARAMETERS POSSIBLE CHANGES<br />

Temperature Increase<br />

Precipitation Increase in local rains, decrease in monsoon rains in<br />

the tropics. Increase in the mid and high altitudes of<br />

the northern hemisphere<br />

Humidity Increase<br />

Cloudiness At high altitude it would be more, leading to positive<br />

GHE, in sea-surface it would show negative GHE<br />

Atmospheric and Oceanic<br />

circulation<br />

Wind direction to change, westerly to become<br />

stronger, in both north and south hemisphere, shut<br />

down of thermohaline and thermocline circulation<br />

Ice-cap and Glaciers Melting at steady pace, increase in sea level<br />

Ocean Acidification Acidity will increase<br />

Drought and<br />

5-50% increase by 2050 A.D. in the lower<br />

Desertification<br />

latitudinally placed regions in the north hemisphere<br />

Hurricanes, Storms and Will increase with time<br />

tsunamis<br />

Compounding Effects Further warming in vicious circle<br />

Litter Decomposition rate Likely to increase in the colder biomes; in the<br />

tropical regions, it is likely to increase unto a certain<br />

limit and then decrease<br />

Soil Fertility Decrease with increased run-off and high rate of<br />

erosion<br />

Soil Moisture Content Will increase in higher altitude and decrease in lower<br />

altitude (depending upon soil type)<br />

Species composition Change according to Location, Climatic and Edaphic<br />

conditions: a. extinction<br />

b. change in migratory habits and migration to<br />

suitable sites<br />

c. habitat fragmentation<br />

Adaptations in plant<br />

communities<br />

a. Phenological<br />

Stilt roots<br />

Adaptation<br />

b. Seed Dispersal Plants likely to adapt themselves to long distance<br />

Mechanism<br />

seed-dispersal mechanism.<br />

Other Adaptations Early blooming, fruiting, shortening of life-span, etc.<br />

Respiration Rate Increase<br />

Photosynthesis Rate Increase upto a certain level and then decrease<br />

183


GLOBAL WARMING: IMPLICATIONS AND ANTICIPATORY ADAPTIVE MEASURES<br />

2. Socio-economic Aspects (Tab. 2)<br />

Worldwide, hundreds of millions of people would be displaced by the inundation<br />

of low-lying coastal plains, deltas, and islands in this very century if efforts to reduce the<br />

GHGs are not successful (Tab. 3). The situation will be grave due to spread of aridity and<br />

eventually impoverishment [LEGGETT, 1990].<br />

Taking into account the composite effect of climate, geology and edaphic factors,<br />

the agricultural production is likely to be highly affected. The summers of 1988 A.D. was<br />

recorded to be unusually hot the drought that followed caused a loss of 30% in the grain<br />

production in North America [IPCC, 1990).<br />

In many cases the amount of food available to the population at large may not be<br />

greatly reduced, but certain sectors of the population may be significantly affected in terms<br />

of entitlement to food, either by reduced income or lack of resources by subsistence<br />

agriculture [STRZEPEK & SMITH, 1995]. Cities, Hydro-power projects, irrigated<br />

agriculture, shipping, the various uses of waterways, fish and fisheries, the transport,<br />

dilution and treatment of sewage, and the circulation of coastal and oceanic water are all<br />

dependent upon the flow of fresh water from the land. As water resources go on<br />

diminishing, there is an increased risk of conflicts amongst and within Nations [IPCC,<br />

1990].With the increase in global warming; there will be a simultaneous increase in natural<br />

disasters. This, combined with the inter- and intra-national conflicts will cause extreme<br />

psychological disturbances to the survivors and the people involved in the conflicts<br />

[CHAMBERLIN, 1980].<br />

Financial institutions, including the two largest insurance companies, Munich Re and<br />

Swiss Re warned that ‘the increasing frequency of severe climatic events, coupled with social<br />

trends could cost almost US$150 billion in the coming decades’ [UNEP, 2002]. Production of<br />

non-wood produce from forests will decrease due to insufficient accumulated winter chilling,<br />

thereby affecting the economy of the tribals severely in India [TEWARI, 1994].<br />

During summers the need of the energy will heightened and in winter it is<br />

speculated to go down, affecting production of energy accordingly, if low and mid latitudes<br />

of northern hemisphere would become warmer [ROSENBERG & CROSSON, 1991].<br />

Climate change will directly or indirectly affect the human health in various ways.<br />

The distribution of a range of diseases currently confine largely to the tropics, viz., malaria,<br />

trypanosomiasis, kalaazar, filariasis, and various worm-infestations are correlated to the<br />

temperature and could be affected by climate change as vectors of these pathogens would<br />

have an extended habitat range. Distribution of other non-parasitic communicable diseases<br />

yellow fever, dengue, plague and dysentery is also related to temperature [GILLETT,<br />

1981]. Development and multiplication of various parasites within their hosts depend on the<br />

mean ambient temperature [GARNHAM, 1964].<br />

Tab. 2. Impacts of global warming on the socio-economic status of human beings<br />

PARAMETERS POSSIBLE CHANGE<br />

Human Settlement and Millions of people to become homeless due to inundation of low-<br />

Society<br />

lying coastal regions<br />

Agriculture and Food Production potential of mid and higher latitudes will increase and<br />

Production<br />

that of the lower latitudes will decrease in the northern hemisphere<br />

Food Entitlement Per capita will decrease<br />

Conflicts between Nations Will rise over sharing resources, particularly water<br />

Mental health Will deteriorate with increasing natural disasters and conflicts<br />

184


AABID RASOOL ZARGAR, MEHRAJ A. SHEIKH, MUNESH KUMAR<br />

Tab. 3. Land and population at risk due to 1 meter sea level rise<br />

Country Land at risk Population at risk<br />

Sq. Km % Sq. Km %<br />

Bangladesh 25000 17.5 13 11.0<br />

Egypt 4200-5250 12-15 6.0 10.7<br />

Senegal 6042-6073 3.1 0.1-0.2 1.4-2.3<br />

Malayasia 7000 2.1 NA NA<br />

Nigeria 18398-18803 2.0 3.2 3.6<br />

China 125000 1.3 72.0 6.5<br />

Venezuela 5686-5730 0.6 0.06 0.3<br />

Uruguay 94 3430-3492 >0.1 NA NA<br />

TOTAL 194852-196498 - 94.4-94.5 -<br />

(Source: NICHOLLS & LEATHERMAN, 1995)<br />

Adaptations<br />

There are two types of responses to climate change and its consequences: Mitigation<br />

and Adaptation. Mitigation means retarding or limiting or eradicating the ‘causes’<br />

completely; whereas, adaptation means acclimatization to the ‘effects’, rather than the<br />

causes. Broadly adaptations are of 2 types – ‘Autonomous’ i.e., biophysical adaptation to<br />

climate change by living organisms and ‘Fostered’ i.e., adaptations driven by policies<br />

[PARRY & CARTER, 1998]. Again fostered adaptations are of 2 types- ‘Reactive’<br />

(policies taken as response to the changes) and ‘Anticipatory’ (policies taken in advance to<br />

anticipated climate change) [SMITH & al. 1996].<br />

Amongst the said steps, anticipatory adaptations policies should be given priority<br />

as they give maximum assurance in minimizing potential negative impacts of climate<br />

change advance.<br />

Why should we go for adaptations?<br />

Mitigation and adaptation are complementary responses and both are needed to<br />

offset the effects of climate change on earth. But mitigating measures show many problems<br />

and have less feasibility during implementation, particularly in cases directly effecting<br />

economic development as adaptations deals with the impacts rather than the causes, it is<br />

more realistic. Again, anticipatory adaptations are preferred in case of uncertain and<br />

irreversible impacts, dependent on climate whose rate of change is very rapid, or threaten<br />

human health and safety and which may cause risk if we are to follow short term<br />

approaches depending upon sudden climate extremes (Tab. 4a). Anticipatory policies are to<br />

be examined before and after implementation to assess net benefit, flexibility, urgency,<br />

further research and equity and political feasibility (Tab. 4b).<br />

Anticipatory measures are to be preferred over reactive measures because reactive<br />

measures cannot offset the negative consequences of climate change, once they occur,<br />

thereby affecting both biophysical and socio-economic aspects. Besides these (Tab. 4c),<br />

anticipatory adaptations provide more time to living beings as well as the society to adapt<br />

themselves to the changing climate.<br />

185


GLOBAL WARMING: IMPLICATIONS AND ANTICIPATORY ADAPTIVE MEASURES<br />

Tab. 4a. Issues Involved in Determining the Need for Anticipatory Adaptation<br />

Issues and Concerns Characteristics<br />

Uncertainty Timing magnitude, direction of climatic change, impacts and their<br />

results are uncertain [SMIT, 1993]<br />

Irreversibility Certain impacts cause long term damages that require anticipatory<br />

adaptation<br />

Effective life of policy Long term decisions made today may need to be reduced down or<br />

toned down in future<br />

Importance of climatic trend Recent knowledge of storms or droughts should be taken into<br />

consideration to modify the long term anticipatory steps [GLANZ,<br />

1988]<br />

Rate of climate change Reactive adaptation to a rapidly changing climate will be more<br />

difficult than to a gradually changing climate<br />

Health and safety Anticipatory steps can be said to be effective only if it does not<br />

harm or affect the health and condition of the ecosystem as a<br />

whole and jeopardize the safety of its components<br />

(Source: SMITH & al. 1998)<br />

Tab. 4b. Criteria involved in Designing and Implementing Anticipatory Policies<br />

Criteria Properties/ Structures<br />

Benefit/<br />

Cost Analysis<br />

Discounted benefits of adaptation measures should substantially exceed the<br />

discounted cost to get the highest priority. A newly designed policy may not<br />

be appropriate if it does not take into account the special needs, e.g., threat to<br />

spp. extinction<br />

Urgency If the rate of change of climate is rapid rather than gradual, then the<br />

anticipatory policies should be implemented quickly to draw maximum<br />

benefit from it<br />

Flexibility It should be flexible enough to enable a resource to adapt itself successfully<br />

to a wide range of future climatic pattern, since the direction and the<br />

magnitude of climate change is uncertain<br />

Use of Planning Small adaptation policies with marginal action on pre-determined policies<br />

should be used so as to enhance the reacting ability of a resource system to<br />

climate change, within a low cost range<br />

Mitigation Effect It should be designed in such a way that it has a dual effect, i.e., these should<br />

help to mitigate climate-change impact to some extent, simultaneously with<br />

adaptation to climate change<br />

Research Appropriate research should be incorporated in the designing of the policy,<br />

though in case of urgency, there is little scope as it takes years to develop a<br />

model based on sustained climatic effects on various factors<br />

Equity and Values Every sector of a society should be treated and considered equally during<br />

policy designing, irrespective of their economic status. Policies should<br />

conform to the needs and wants of the human within the limitation of<br />

resources<br />

(Source: STRZEPEK & SMITH, 1995)<br />

186


AABID RASOOL ZARGAR, MEHRAJ A. SHEIKH, MUNESH KUMAR<br />

Tab. 4c. Possible Anticipatory Adaptation Policies in Different Sectors<br />

Sectors Parameters Possible anticipatory adaptation policies<br />

Coastal Zone Wetland Preservation Healthy Wetlands are to be preserved so as to store<br />

Management<br />

the water of excessive precipitation<br />

Integrated Development Identification of land areas to be affected by<br />

climate change and compilation of all data in an<br />

integrated form<br />

Improved Coastal Model New and improved model to be made based on the<br />

prior evaluation of responses<br />

Land Use Planning Perseverance of landscape, plans for shoreline<br />

development<br />

Water Conservation<br />

Drip irrigation, sprinkler irrigation, etc. are to be<br />

Resources<br />

mass introduced by the government in agriculture<br />

Recycling of sewage water<br />

Market Allocation Market based allocation of water<br />

Pollution Control Assurance of quality and safety limits of water<br />

River Basin Planning Sediment sluicing, maintenance of proper height of<br />

dam, length of canal, etc.<br />

International demarcations and compromise on<br />

common water resources<br />

Environmental concerns and socio-economic<br />

factors are to be given due consideration<br />

Drought Contingency Conservation of wetlands, building of reservoirs,<br />

Planning<br />

ensuring efficient water use, prediction of drought<br />

years, etc.<br />

Human health Weather/ Health Watch/ Prediction of possible outbreaks of diseases related<br />

Warning Systems to weather change<br />

Public health<br />

Integrated pest management steps to combat large<br />

Improvement<br />

scale spread of contagious diseases<br />

Improvement of Compilation and computation of future outbreaks<br />

Surveillance System based on previously collected relevant data<br />

Ecosystem Biodiversity<br />

Ecological diversity and balance as well as the<br />

diverse gene pool are to be maintained<br />

Preservation of endangered spp. ex situ,<br />

preservation of their natural habitat, artificial<br />

regeneration<br />

Afforestation, reforestation and plantation (natural<br />

CO2 sink)<br />

Agriculture Protection and<br />

Enhancement of<br />

Migration Corridor<br />

Corridors and buffer-zones around the reserved<br />

areas should be protected<br />

Watershed Protection Reforestation of areas in watershed to prevent bank<br />

erosion, siltation and soil loss<br />

Irrigation Efficiency Improved irrigation methods are to be adopted to<br />

decrease water consumption, after computing cost<br />

benefit analysis<br />

Development of New Development of better heat and drought tolerant<br />

Crop-Types<br />

crops<br />

(Source: SMITH & TRIPAK, 1989)<br />

187


GLOBAL WARMING: IMPLICATIONS AND ANTICIPATORY ADAPTIVE MEASURES<br />

Conclusion<br />

Summing up what we have compiled in this work, we can conclude that it is a fact<br />

that climatic change due to global warming cannot be denied and already substantial losses<br />

have been faced with by the earth and its inhabitants. But again there remains extensive<br />

scope for further research and experimentations into the causes of global warming. Though<br />

certain impacts are positive, most of them that we see and can estimate are negative and<br />

pose to be threat to our very civilization on earth. Hence arises, the need to mitigate the<br />

same and adopt preventive measures. But, once the damage has been done, it becomes<br />

difficult to restore the situation. Therefore, it is advisable to adopt measures that are in<br />

anticipation to the changing climate, based on previous records and data of changes on<br />

earth. Anticipatory adaptive measures provide time and scope for better acclimatization and<br />

are more practical and feasible with respect to implementation.<br />

References<br />

1. BHARDWAJ S. D. & PANWAR P. 2003. Global warming and Climate change- Effects and strategies for its<br />

mitigation. Indian Forester, 129 (6): 741-748.<br />

2. BROWN P. 2003. Climate change extends hay fever season. The Guardian., Feb. 4.<br />

3. Center for Biological Diversity. 2005. Annual Report. www.biological diversity.org<br />

4. CHAMBERLIN B. C. 1980. Mayo Seminars in Psychiatry: the psychological aftermath of disaster. Journal<br />

of Clinical Psychiatry, 41: 238-244.<br />

5. CHANDRASHEKARA U. M. & SREEJITH. K. A. 2003. Possible impact of climate change on the tree<br />

species composition and diversity in lowland evergreen forests of Kerala, Western Ghats. Indian<br />

Forester, 129(6): 770-775.<br />

6. CHARLSON R. J., LOVELOCK J. E., ANDREAE M. O. & WARREN S. G. 1987. Oceanic Phytoplankton,<br />

atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate. Nature, 326: 655-661.<br />

7. CROZIER L. 2004. Warmer winters drive butterfly range expansion by increasing survivorship. Ecology,<br />

85(1): 231-241.<br />

8. Earth Systems Research Laboratory 2009. (ESRL) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration<br />

(NOAA).<br />

9. EGHBALL B., GILLEY J. E., BALTENSPERGER D. D. & BLUMENTHAL. J. M. 2002. Phosphorus and<br />

nitrogen in runoff following long-term and recent manure and fertilizer applications. Trans. ASAE, 45:<br />

687-694.<br />

10. GARNHAM P. C. 1964. Factors Influencing the Development of Protozoa in their Arthropodan Hosts, in<br />

A.E.R. TAYLOR (ed.), Host - Parasite Relationships in Invertebrate Hosts, Blackwell Scientific<br />

Puiblications, Oxford.<br />

11. GILLETT J. D. 1981. Increased atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and the spread of parasitic disease, in<br />

Parasitological Tropics; a presentation volume to P. C. Garnham FRS on his 80 th birthday (Society of<br />

protozoologists, Special publication, vol. 1).<br />

12. GLANTZ M. H. (ed). 1988. Societal Responses to Regional Climate Change: Forecasting by Analogy.<br />

Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA.<br />

13. GRIME J. P. 1979. Plant Strategies and vegetation Processes, Wiley, Chichester.<br />

14. HATFIELD J. L. & Prueger J. H. 2004. Impact of changing precipitation patterns on water quality. Journal<br />

of Soil Science and Water Conservation, 59(1): 51-58.<br />

15. HUNTLEY B. 1991. How plants respond to climate change: migration rates, individualism and the<br />

consequences for plant communities. Annals of Botany, 67(1): 15-22.<br />

16. IPCC. 1990. Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment. J.T. Houghton, G.J. Jenkins and J.J.<br />

Ephraums (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 365 pp.<br />

17. IPCC. 1990. First Assessment Report (FAR) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.<br />

18. IPCC. 2001. Historical overview of climate change science. Third Assessment Report of the<br />

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.<br />

188


AABID RASOOL ZARGAR, MEHRAJ A. SHEIKH, MUNESH KUMAR<br />

19. IPCC. 2007. Historical overview of climate change science. Fourth Assessment Report of the<br />

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: 4-25.<br />

20. KELLOMAKI S., KARJALAINEN T. & VAISANEN H. 1997. More timber from boreal forests under<br />

changing climate? Forest Ecology and Management, 94(1-3): 195-208.<br />

21. KHANDURI V. P., DHAN SINGH, SUMER CHANDRA & SHARMA C. M. 2003 Flowering plants: the<br />

first indicator of climate change. Indian Forester, 129(7): 931-933.<br />

22. LEGGETT J. (ed.). (1990). Global Warming – The Greenpeace Report, Oxford University Press.<br />

23. MARGRIET V., PETER H., VANTIENDEREN W., LEONARD J., HOLLEMAN & MARCELE V. 2007.<br />

Predicting adaptation of phenology in response to climate change, an insect herbivore example. Global<br />

Change Biology, 13: 1596–1604, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01400.x<br />

24. MURPHY A. W., PLATTS-MILLS T. A., LOBO M. & HAYDEN F. 1998. Respiratory nitric oxide levels in<br />

experimental human influenza. Chest, 114: 452-456.<br />

25. NEGI J. D. S, CHAUHAN P. S. & MRIDULA NEGI. 2003. Evidences o climate change and its impact on<br />

structure and function of the forest ecosystems in and around Doon valley’. Indian Forester, 129(6):<br />

757-769.<br />

26. NICHOLLS R. & LEATHERMAN S. 1995. Global Sea Level Rise, in Strzepek, K. and Smith, J. (eds.), As<br />

Climate Changes, International Impacts and Implications. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, p.<br />

92.<br />

27. PARRY M. L. & CARTER T. R. 1998. Climate Impact and Adaptation Assessment: A Guide to the IPCC<br />

Approach. Earthscan, London, 166 pp.<br />

28. RAMANATHAN V., BARKSTROM B. R. & HARRISON E. F. 1989. Climate and the earth’s radiation<br />

budget, Physics Today (May): 22-32.<br />

29. RAWAT L. & RAWAT V. 1998. Rainfall Patterns in Doon valley, India. Indian Forester, 124: 7-9.<br />

30. ROBINSON W. R, PETERS R. H & ZIMMERMANN J. 1983. The effects of body size and temperature on<br />

metabolic rate of organisms. Can. J. Zool, 61: 281–288.<br />

31. ROSENBERG N. J., & CROSSON P. R. 1991. Processes for identifying regional influences of and<br />

responses to increasing atmospheric CO2 and climate change - The MINK Project: An Overview.<br />

Report Prepared for the U. S. dept. of Energy. DOE/RL/01830T-H5.<br />

32. SHANKER R. & SRIVASTAVA D. 1999. Symp. on Snow Ice Glacier: A Himalayan Perspective, 9–11<br />

March: 1-7.<br />

33. SMIT. B.(ed.).1993. Adaptation to climatic variability and change: Report of the Task Force on climate<br />

adaptation. Department of Geography. Occasional paper no. 19. Guelp, Ontario, Canada, University of<br />

Guelp.<br />

34. SMITH J. B., FEENSTRA J. F., BURTON I. & TOL R. S. J. (Eds.). 1998. Handbook on methods for climate<br />

change impact assessment and adaptation strategies. Nairobi and Amsterdam: UNEP and Institute for<br />

Environmental Studies/Vrije Universiteit.<br />

35. SMITH J. B., BHATTI N., MENZHULIN G., BENIOFF R., BUDYKO M. I., CAMPOS M., JALLOW B.,<br />

& RIJSBERMAN F. (eds.). 1996. Adapting to Climate Change: An International Perspective.<br />

Springer- Verlag, New York, USA, 475 pp.<br />

36. SMITH J. B. & TIRPAK D. (ed. 1989) The potential effects of global climate change on the United States,<br />

US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.<br />

37. STRZEPEK, K. M. & SMITH J. B. (ed.). 1995. Adaptation Policy, As Climate Changes; International<br />

Impacts and Implication, Cambridge University Press.<br />

38. TEWARI D. N. 1994. Forests and Climate, Indian Forester, 120: 9-12.<br />

39. UNEP / GRID Adrenal report, 1995, 2001, 2002.<br />

40. UNFCCC. 1997 .Report of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice on the Work of its<br />

Fourth Session, Geneva, Switzerland, 1618 December 1996. FCCC/SBSTA/1996/20, 27 January 1997,<br />

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 16 pp. + annex.<br />

41. WOODWELL G. M. & WHITTAKER R. H. 1968. Primary production in terrestrial ecosystem. American<br />

Zoologist, 8: 19-30.<br />

189


191<br />

ANIVERSALIA<br />

PROFESSOR PhD TOADER CHIFU AT THE 75 TH ANNIVERSARY<br />

Professor PhD Toader CHIFU was born<br />

in Târnăuca, Jud. Dorohoi (nowadays the locality is<br />

in Ukraine Republic), on February 27, 1936.<br />

He started the primary school courses in<br />

1941 in his origin village Crihăneşti - Târnăuca, but<br />

because of the war he finished these studies in 1946<br />

at the Şendriceni Applications School. The<br />

Secondary School has been realized in Pomârla<br />

(exception the 7 th year followed in Bucecea). Also in<br />

Pomârla he followed the courses of the Technical<br />

Agronomical School (graduated in 1954). After the<br />

graduate of the secondary school he worked as<br />

agronomist technician (1954 - 1956).<br />

In 1956 he became a student in the Natural Sciences – Geography Faculty within<br />

“Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University from Iaşi (graduated in 1960).<br />

After he graduated the academic studies, he held the assistant function (1960 -<br />

1965) in the Botany Department of the Biology - Geography - Geology Faculty and since<br />

1965 until 1968 he worked as a botanist in the Botanic Garden from Iaşi. Since 1968 he<br />

worked as a Scientifically Researcher in the Geobotany Laboratory within Iaşi Filial of the<br />

Romanian Academy, and since 1976 worked as a Scientifically Researcher in the<br />

Biological Research Center from Iaşi, where he was the Chief of the Terrestrial Ecology<br />

collective. As recognition of the value of his research he was invited to keep courses of<br />

lectures and research stages in the National Agronomical Institute from Alger (1976-1980)<br />

in Systematic Botany, Phytogeography, Vegetal Ecology, General and applied biocoenotics<br />

domains. In 1981 - 1989 periods he gave lectures of Systematic Botany, Tropical and<br />

Subtropical Flora, Vegetal taxonomy, Photosynthesis and productivity of ecosystems and<br />

Environment Protection Fundaments in the Faculty of Biology. In 1990 - 1992 he hold the<br />

Senior Researcher function in the Biological Research Institute from Iaşi, and in 1992 -<br />

1995 period he hold the Senior Lecturer function within the Vegetal Biology Department of<br />

the Faculty of Biology from “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University Iaşi. Starting with 1995<br />

year he is a Professor at the same institution.<br />

He holds a PhD diploma in Phytosociology - Mycology since 1971 at “Alexandru<br />

Ioan Cuza” University from Iaşi. Currently he is Consulting Professor and a PhD<br />

coordinator within the Faculty of Biology Iaşi.<br />

The research activity of Professor Chifu, as reflected by over than 150 published<br />

papers and 7 books covers five main directions: mycology and mycocoenology, systematic<br />

botany, phytosociology, structure and productivity of ecosystems and nature conservation.<br />

In all of these areas he obtained significant results as:<br />

• identification of 700 macromycetes taxa from Moldova and Dobrogea<br />

(approximately 50% from all taxa known in Romania);


• discovery of 20 new macromycetes taxa for Romania;<br />

• contributions to the chorology of 2.300 cormophytes taxa (1 new for Romania)<br />

and over 300 coenotaxa (47 new for science: Cembreto - Piceetum abietis Chifu et<br />

al. 1984; Medicagini - Festucetum valessiacae anthoxanthetosum Chifu et Ştefan<br />

1978 etc.);<br />

During field and laboratory research activities professor Chifu collected and<br />

identified a rich floristic material and initiated a herbarium including vascular plants at the<br />

Biological Research Institute. Also he contributed to the enrichment of the herbarium<br />

collections from the Biology Faculty Iaşi (approximate 500 mycological herbarium sheets<br />

and 400 vascular plants sheets, inclusive species from Algeria).<br />

He realized documentation trainings in Hungary (1974) and Switzerland (1991).<br />

Also, he participated to numerous international scientific meetings: Excursion International<br />

de Phytosociologie en Suisse, Geneva (1991); International Excursion of Phytosociology in<br />

Apuseni Mountains (1993); Colloque “Végétation et sols de montagnes”, Grenoble - France<br />

(1996); II-ème Congrè de la Fédération Internationale de Phytosociologie, Bailleul - France<br />

(1997); XXVIII-ème Colloque Phytosociologique, Camerino - Italy (1998) etc. He<br />

participated at numerous scientific and didactic excursions in Atlas Mountains (Algeria and<br />

Morocco), Sahara Dessert (Algeria), Swiss Alps and French Alps, French Central Massif,<br />

North Sea Shore (France), Pyrenees Mountains (Andorra and France), Apennines<br />

Mountains (Italy) etc.<br />

He has, also, received multiple grants for research – 50 research grants as<br />

responsible or coordinator. Professor Chifu is a distinguished member of the scientific<br />

board for journals like: Romanian Journal of Biology – Plant Biology (ex Révue Roumaine<br />

de Biologie, série Biologie végétale); Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii “Alexandru Ioan<br />

Cuza” Iaşi, s.II.a Biologie vegetală; Cercetări Agronomice din Moldova.<br />

Professor Chifu is a founder member of the Romanian Phytosociological Society,<br />

Romanian Mycological Society and Gh. Lupascu Foundation for Science and Culture. He is<br />

also member in the Ecology Society from Romania, Amicale Internationale de<br />

Phytosociologie Society (Bailleul – France) and Association pour l'étude de la végétation<br />

(Uppsala - Sweden).<br />

This is the didactic and scientific activity realized in his life by Professor Toader<br />

Chifu. Beyond all these important realizations, Professor Toader Chifu is a man with a high<br />

moral and professional conduit. All his achievements became possible due to his tenacity,<br />

perseverance and passion for botany and also due to his family understanding and support.<br />

The 75 th anniversary represents a jubilee moment both for professor Chifu, for his<br />

family and also for the entire academic community. On the behalf of all the colleagues from<br />

the Botanic Garden “Anastasie Fătu” of Iaşi, we wish Professor Toader Chifu a long life,<br />

good health and all the best for many years to come.<br />

192<br />

Happy Anniversary!<br />

Constantin MARDARI, Cătălin TĂNASE


193<br />

BOOK REVIEW<br />

Tatiana Eugenia Şesan & Cătălin Tănase, Phytopatogenic ascomycetes, 2011, Bucureşti University<br />

Publishing House<br />

Phytopathogenic Ascomycetes volume represents a new contribution to the updating of<br />

knowledge on this group of fungi, important both theoretically, but especially from the practical<br />

perspective, especially targeting those (asco) taxa that are pathogens on crops but also on the<br />

spontaneous species. This paper is addressing to all those who are training and specializing in<br />

Phytopathology and Plants Protection domains.<br />

Thus, the book is a continuation of the author’s project to update the knowledge of plant<br />

pathology, after the publication in 2007 of the book Anamorphic phytopathogenic fungi, published<br />

by the same team in the prestigious Publishing House of University from Bucharest.<br />

Ascomycetes taxonomy, published so far by the same authors [TĂNASE & ŞESAN, 2006;<br />

ŞESAN & TĂNASE, 2006] based on the Dictionary of the Fungi, IX th edition (2001), has been<br />

updated in this volume after the new edition of the Dictionary of the Fungi X th edition [KIRK & al.<br />

2008] and after the book Fungal Families in the world [CANNON & KIRK, 2007], published as an<br />

annex to the first dictionary. We mention that, besides the recognized difficulty of the taxonomy of<br />

fungi, in this area have recently been recorded many new results, modern, on which different authors<br />

have contributed to some changes, clarifications, evaluations and reevaluations that have made<br />

imperative the updating of the knowledge in this field, actualizations of which the authors of this<br />

paper wanted to align. In the future, the authors have also in preparation a volume dedicated to<br />

phytopathogenic basidiomycetes (2012) in order to complete the actualization of the most important<br />

taxonomic groups of fungi that cause damage to plants.<br />

The book is divided into eight chapters, starting with general data, fundamental data on the<br />

macromycetes diversity and on the variability of this group, on the organization and taxonomy of<br />

phytopathogenic ascomycetes. For each phytopathogenic species are presented the relevant symptoms<br />

on the host plants, the life cycle, but also elements necessary to prevent and combat the attack. Given<br />

the applicability of research results in plant protection domain, tables have been prepared with the<br />

synthetic products plant effective in the protection against every disease, especially useful for<br />

practitioners.<br />

Protection measures, prevention measures and control measures have been developed, for<br />

the diseases produced in crops, forestry, vine cultures, insisting on the un-polluting ones and on the<br />

biological control of plant diseases means. The paper includes unconventional elements of biological<br />

control of plant diseases, summarized from the current literature, but especially supported by the<br />

results obtained over a long career and experience of the authors in the field, confirmed by several<br />

works published in Romanian and international journals.<br />

The volume includes 111 figures and 32 tables prepared by the authors and 6 color plates<br />

with original photographs. The figures illustrates very well the scientific content, the wealth of<br />

information contained in the book and allow more accurate and more intuitive understanding of the<br />

knowledge presented.<br />

A glossary of scientific terms completes the book, to better explain the concepts, to<br />

understand, learn and use of these terms in the interpretation and evaluation of the achieved results.<br />

We recommend this book especially to biologists students (from the departments of<br />

Biology, Ecology and Environmental Protection and Biochemistry), but also to those of the Faculty of<br />

Agriculture, Horticulture, Forestry, and amateurs who want to know the main novelty about<br />

phytopathogenic ascomycetes and how diseases in plant crops can be eradicated.<br />

Prof. PhD. eng. Eugen ULEA<br />

“Ion Ionescu de la Brad” USAMV, Iaşi


)<br />

JOURNAL OF PLANT DEVELOPMENT<br />

GUIDE TO AUTHORS<br />

Types of contributions: Original research papers, as well as short communications. Review<br />

articles will be published following invitation or by the suggestion of authors. "Journal of<br />

Plant Development" also publishes book reviews, as well as conference reports.<br />

Submission of a paper implies that it has not been published previously (except in the form<br />

of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under<br />

consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors, and<br />

that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any<br />

other language, without the written consent of the publisher.<br />

Authors are requested to submit their original paper and figures in digital format, to the<br />

Editor-in-Chief. The corresponding author should be indicated with an asterisk.<br />

Manuscripts must be single-spaced, with wide margins. A font as Times New Roman,<br />

normal, is required.<br />

The mirror of the page would be as follows: 13 x 20 cm (top 4.85 cm, bottom 4.85 cm,<br />

right 4 cm, left 4 cm).<br />

The papers will be published only in a foreign language, structured as follows: title (the title<br />

would be also in the romanian language, if it is possible for the authors), authors, affiliation<br />

of the authors (including e-mails), abstract, keywords, introduction, material and method,<br />

results & discussions, conclusions, acknowledgements, references.<br />

Titles would be written with bold, capital letters, 12 points, centered.<br />

Names and Christian names of the authors would be written with capital letters, 10 points,<br />

centered. The names would not be abbreviated; each author name would be accompanied<br />

by a complete address, as a footnote on the first page.<br />

Abstract: A concise and factual abstract is required (about 100-150 words). The abstract<br />

should state briefly the purpose of the research, the principal results and major conclusions.<br />

An abstract is often presented separately from the article, so it must be able to stand alone.<br />

References should therefore be avoided, but if essential, they must be cited in full, without<br />

reference to the reference list. Non-standard or uncommon abbreviations should be avoided<br />

but, if essential, they should be defined at their first mention in the abstract itself.<br />

Key Words: few words, the most important ones, after someone could discover your paper<br />

on the internet engines.<br />

195


Units: The SI system should be used for all scientific and laboratory data. In certain<br />

instances, it might be necessary to quote other units. These should be added in parentheses.<br />

Temperatures should be given in degrees Celsius.<br />

The main text would be written at a single space, on A4 format page, Times New Roman,<br />

of 10 points.<br />

The scientific names of taxa would be italicized.<br />

Tables should be numbered consecutively in accordance with their appearance in the text<br />

and given suitable captions. Be sparing in the use of tables and ensure that the data<br />

presented in tables do not duplicate results described elsewhere in the article.<br />

Illustrations: photographs, charts and diagrams are all to be referred to as “Figure(s)”,<br />

should be numbered consecutively in accordance with their appearance in the text. The<br />

mentions at the drawings, figures, pictures and tables will be placed inside the round<br />

brackets – for instance (Fig. 2); (Tab. 2); all illustrations should be clearly marked with the<br />

figure number and the author’s name.<br />

Obs.: all the schemes, drawings, etc. would be accompanied by a scale; the pictures must<br />

be very clear, being accompanied by the explanations. The diagrams should be made in<br />

Excel; pictures, ink drawings must be saved in JPG, JPEG, or BMP format, having a good<br />

resolution.<br />

Other than the cover page, every page of the manuscript, including the title page,<br />

references, tables etc. should be numbered; however, no reference should be made in the<br />

text to page numbers.<br />

All publications cited in the text should be presented in a list of references following the<br />

text of the manuscript. In the text, references are made using the author (s) name of a<br />

certain paper (e.g.: other authors [GÉHU, 2006] mentioned that…). The full reference<br />

should be given in a numerical list in the end of the paper. References should be given<br />

inside the square brackets.<br />

Obs.: if there are two authors only, there must be written down both names (ex. [BOX &<br />

MANTHEY, 2006]); if there are more authors, there would be written the first author<br />

followed by “& al.” (ex. [AMORFINI & al. 2006]).<br />

References<br />

For scientific papers: the name of the author (s) would be given in capital letters. The<br />

Christian name (s) would be abbreviated. Before the last but one and the last author you<br />

must insert the sign “&”. In the reference list you must mention all the authors of a certain<br />

paper.<br />

The year of a paper publication is put after the author (s).<br />

Title: it should be fully written. The title of a book is written in italics. Between the year<br />

and the title we recommend to be inserted a dot sign. Next to it is the town and the<br />

publishing house of it (for books) or the periodical for papers. For periodicals, the<br />

abbreviations would be according to the international standards (BRIDSON & SMITH,<br />

1991 or BROWN & STRATTON (eds), 1963-1965). Each periodical name is to be written<br />

196


in italics. A certain volume must be given in bolds. After it is placed the number of the<br />

issue, inserted between the round brackets; next to it would be inserted the page numbers of<br />

the paper.<br />

For books, after the title, is placed the name of the town, the publishing house and the<br />

number of pages.<br />

The chapter in books: author (s), year, title, pages, a dot sign, followed by “In”: author (s)<br />

of the book, city, publishing house, number of pages.<br />

Serial papers or chapters in serial papers: like the previous, but with the specification of<br />

the serial volume.<br />

Obs.: it is compulsory that all the papers from the reference list to be cited in the<br />

manuscript. The punctuation signs would not be in bold or italics. The references should be<br />

written in alphabetic order only. If a certain author has more papers with other contributors,<br />

the papers would be given also in alphabetic order (and not after the year of appearance).<br />

The number of a volume, the issue etc. would be given with Arabian numbers.<br />

Examples of papers quotation:<br />

References for papers in periodicals:<br />

CIOCÂRLAN V. 2008. Lathyrus linifolius (Reichard) Bässler in the Romanian flora. J.<br />

Plant Develop., 15: 3-6.<br />

MEHREGAN I. & KADEREIT J. W. 2008. Taxonomic revision of Cousinia sect.<br />

Cynaroideae (Asteraceae, Cardueae). Willdenowia. 38(2): 293-362.<br />

References for books:<br />

BOŞCAIU N. 1971. Flora şi Vegetaţia Munţilor Ţarcu, Godeanu şi Cernei. Bucureşti:<br />

Edit. Acad. Române, 494 pp.<br />

HILLIER J. & COOMBES A. 2004. The Hillier Manual of Trees & Shrubs. Newton<br />

Abbot, Devon, England: David & Charles, 512 pp.<br />

Serials:<br />

JALAS J. SUOMINEN J. LAMPINEN R. & KURTTO A. (eds). 1999. Atlas Florae<br />

Europaeae. Distribution of vascular plants in Europe. Vol. 12. Resedaceae to Platanaceae.<br />

Helsinki: Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe and Societas Biologica Fennica<br />

Vanamo. Maps 2928-3270, 250 pp., ill (maps), ISBN 951-9108.<br />

TUTIN T. G., BURGES N. A., CHATER A. O., EDMONDSON J. R., HEYWOOD V. H.,<br />

MOORE D. M., VALENTINE D. H., WALTERS S. M. & WEBB D. A. (eds, assist. by J.<br />

R. AKEROYD & M. E. NEWTON; appendices ed. by R. R. MILL). 1996. Flora<br />

Europaea. 2nd ed., 1993, reprinted 1996. Vol. 1. Psilotaceae to Platanaceae. Cambridge:<br />

Cambridge University Press, xlvi, 581 pp., illus. ISBN 0-521-41007-X (HB).<br />

Chapters in books:<br />

†TUTIN T. G. 1996. Helleborus L. Pp. 249-251. In: †T. G. TUTIN et al. (eds). Flora<br />

Europaea. 2nd ed., 1993, reprinted 1996. Vol. 1. Psilotaceae to Platanaceae. Cambridge:<br />

Cambridge University Press, xlvi, 581 pp., illus. ISBN 0-521-41007-X (HB).<br />

197


Short Communications: follow the same format as for the full papers, except that<br />

the Results and Discussion section (these should be combined). Manuscripts should not<br />

exceed 2000 words.<br />

Special Issues: Proposals for Special Issues of full research papers that focus on a<br />

specific topic or theme will be considered.<br />

Proofs will be sent to the corresponding author and should be returned within 48<br />

hours of receipt. Corrections should be restricted to typesetting errors. All queries should be<br />

answered.<br />

A review would not exceed an A4 format page.<br />

Manuscripts should be sent to:<br />

E-mail: gbot.is@uaic.ro<br />

or<br />

E-mail: ana.cojocariu@uaic.ro<br />

© Botanic Garden “Anastasie Fatu” <strong>Iasi</strong>, 2010<br />

All rights (including translation into foreign languages) reserved. Except for the<br />

abstracts and keywords, no part of this issue may be reproduced, without the prior written<br />

permission of the publisher.<br />

198

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!